Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of the Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Krill and Fish Oil
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Normalizing Multi-Omics Neural Network for Pan-Cancer Prognostication
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Key Molecular Pathways Underlying Huanglongbing Tolerance and Susceptibility in Six Citrus Cultivars

Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Microbial Signals and Disease Control, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7359; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157359
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 13 July 2025 / Accepted: 28 July 2025 / Published: 30 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Microbe Interaction: Current Status and Future Directions)

Abstract

Huanglongbing (HLB), caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), is the most devastating disease threatening global citrus production. Although no commercial citrus varieties exhibit complete HLB resistance, genotype-specific tolerance variations remain underexplored. This study conducted a comparative transcriptomic profiling of six commercially citrus cultivars in South China, four susceptible cultivars (C. reticulata cv. Tankan, Gongkan, Shatangju, and C. sinensis Osbeck cv. Newhall), and two tolerant cultivars (C. limon cv. Eureka; C. maxima cv Guanxi Yu) to dissect molecular mechanisms underlying HLB responses. Comparative transcriptomic analyses revealed extensive transcriptional reprogramming, with tolerant cultivars exhibiting fewer differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and targeted defense activation compared to susceptible genotypes. The key findings highlighted the genotype-specific regulation of starch metabolism, where β-amylase 3 (BAM3) was uniquely upregulated in tolerant varieties, potentially mitigating starch accumulation. Immune signaling diverged significantly: tolerant cultivars activated pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) via receptor-like kinases (FLS2) and suppressed ROS-associated RBOH genes, while susceptible genotypes showed the hyperactivation of ethylene signaling and oxidative stress pathways. Cell wall remodeling in susceptible cultivars involved upregulated xyloglucan endotransglucosylases (XTH), contrasting with pectin methylesterase induction in tolerant Eureka lemon for structural reinforcement. Phytohormonal dynamics revealed SA-mediated defense and NPR3/4 suppression in Eureka lemon, whereas susceptible cultivars prioritized ethylene/JA pathways. These findings delineate genotype-specific strategies in citrus–CLas interactions, identifying BAM3, FLS2, and cell wall modifiers as critical targets for breeding HLB-resistant cultivars through molecular-assisted selection. This study provides a foundational framework for understanding host–pathogen dynamics and advancing citrus immunity engineering.

1. Introduction

Citrus Huanglongbing (HLB), a devastating global disease threatening citrus production for over a century, systematically infects trees across all developmental stages. Typical HLB symptoms included chlorotic shoots, mottled leaves, fruit deformation, and premature abscission, culminating in rapid tree decline and mortality [1,2]. HLB is caused by the unculturable phloem-limited α-proteobacterium, comprising three species, i.e., Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), Ca. L. africanus (CLaf), and Ca. L. americanus (CLam). CLas has dominated Chinese outbreaks since its initial identification in Guangdong Province [3,4]. Currently, no cure is available for HLB. Although most commercial citrus cultivars exhibited susceptibility to HLB, certain genotypes demonstrated natural tolerance to CLas infection [5]. Notably, HLB tolerance was observed in the species Citrus limon (lemon) and C. maxima (pomelo), whereas C. sinensis (sweet orange) and C. reticulata Blanco (mandarin) exhibited susceptibility to the pathogen [6]. These findings were consistent with earlier reports suggesting genotype-dependent tolerance mechanisms in citrus [5,7]. In addition, studies also identified pivotal HLB-resistant citrus genes, including CitPH4 (MYB transcription factor) [8], CsHIPP03 (heavy metal-associated isoprenylated protein) [9], and ClDJC24 (co-chaperone) [10] and MYB2 [11]. These discoveries advanced molecular breeding strategies to enhance citrus immunity against CLas pathogenesis.
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has emerged as a pivotal tool in elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying citrus–CLas interactions, providing critical insights into citrus–CLas dynamics and cultivar-specific responses. Current studies demonstrate that CLas induced extensive metabolic reprogramming in citrus hosts, characterized by the preferential activation of ATP biosynthesis and glycolytic pathways to sustain bacterial proliferation, concurrent with the systemic suppression of photosynthetic machinery and defense-related signaling cascades [6,12]. Seasonal transcriptomic profiling revealed distinct temporal regulation of immune responses, with spring emergence exhibiting a pronounced activation of pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity components, including NBS-LRR receptors, receptor-like kinases (RLKs), and pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, thereby reinforcing HLB as an pathogen-triggered immune disease [13,14]. An integrative analysis of citrus transcriptomic datasets also identified conserved transcriptional signatures across diverse citrus genotypes, with leaf-specific transcriptional networks showing particular sensitivity to HLB progression, suggesting tissue-specific vulnerability patterns [15]. These multilayered investigations collectively established a framework for understanding HLB/CLas pathogenesis while highlighting potential targets for precision breeding strategies.
This study present a comprehensive investigation into genotype-specific responses to HLB pathogenesis across six major commercially cultivated citrus varieties in South China, including Citrus reticulata cv. Gongkan, C. reticulata cv. Tankan, C. reticulata Blanco cv. Shatangju, C. limon cv Eureka, C. maxima cv Guanxi Yu, and C. sinensis Osbeck cv. Newhall. Through a systematic comparative analysis of RNA-seq profiles derived from asymptomatic and symptomatic leaf tissues, we elucidated distinct molecular pathways underlying differential susceptibility to CLas infection. The multi-variety experimental design enabled the identification of key molecular components associated with pathogen recognition, immune activation, and metabolic reprogramming that collectively determine host compatibility. Particularly, comparative transcriptomic profiling revealed conserved and divergent regulatory networks between tolerant and susceptible genotypes, highlighting critical targets for resistance engineering. These findings provided a robust framework for understanding host–pathogen dynamics in citrus–CLas interactions and established functional genomic resources for breeding programs aimed at developing CLas-resistant citrus cultivars through molecular-assisted selection.

2. Results

2.1. Symptoms and CLas Quantification of Leaf Samples from Six HLB-Affected Citrus Cultivars

HLB-affected leaves displayed characteristic symptoms including pronounced yellowing leaves in Tankan mandarin, Newhall orange, Shatangju mandarin, and Gongkan mandarin, while Eureka lemon and Guanxi pomelo showed typical mottling leaves (Figure 1). For each cultivar, asymptomatic leaves were collected from healthy trees and tested by quantitative PCR. None of these healthy controls yielded detectable CLas (Ct > 38 or undetermined), confirming their uninfected status. The quantification of symptomatic leaves revealed significant interspecific variation in CLas titer: Guanxi pomelo harbored the highest CLas concentration (average Ct value of 18.30 ± 4.07), followed by Newhall orange (18.80 ± 2.31), Gongkan mandarin (19.64 ± 1.06), Shatangju mandarin (21.36 ± 2.10), Tankan mandarin (22.57 ± 4.96), and Eureka lemon (23.31 ± 2.82) (Figure 1, Supplementary Table S3).

2.2. Identification of DEGs

RNA sequencing yielded 36 high-quality libraries, each producing 40–55 million paired-end reads (150 bp; Q30 > 86%) with reference genome alignment rates of 74.09–92.45% (Supplementary Table S1). The biological replicates were highly correlated, with Pearson’s correlation coefficient ranging from 0.612 to 1 (Supplementary Table S2). DESeq2 analysis (|log2FC| ≥ 1.5, padj < 0.05) revealed extensive transcriptional reprogramming across citrus cultivars (Figure 2). The number of DEGs varied among citrus cultivars, including 6307 DEGs in Tankan mandarin (5568 up, 739 down), 8945 DEGs in Gongkan mandarin (7120 up, 1825 down), 6879 DEGs in Shatangju mandarin (5296 up, 1583 down), 4784 DEGs in Newhall orange (3656 up, 1128 down), 5914 DEGs in Eureka lemon (4798 up, 1116 down), and 5367 DEGs in Guanxi pomelo (4021 up, 1346 down). Comparative analysis identified 585 conserved DEGs across all cultivars (Figure 3). Cultivar-specific responses were prominent, as seen in Tankan mandarin (1069 DEGs), Gongkan mandarin (2616 DEGs), Newhall orange (597 DEGs), Shatangju mandarin (1491 DEGs), Eureka lemon (1688 DEGs), and Guanxi pomelo (1703 DEGs), suggesting both conserved and cultivar-specific mechanisms underlying HLB adaptation.

2.3. Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG Enrichment Analysis

A GO analysis of DEGs revealed distinct functional enrichment patterns between cultivars. Susceptible cultivars showed 33 (Tankan mandarin), 8 (Gongkan mandarin), 17 (Newhall orange), and 16 (Shatangju mandarin) significantly enriched GO terms, with 6 shared terms mainly including DNA metabolic processes and RNA-directed DNA polymerase activity (Supplementary Table S4). In contrast, tolerant cultivars exhibited 27 (Eureka lemon) and 28 (Guanxi pomelo) enriched terms, sharing 13 functional categories such as carbon fixation, NADH dehydrogenase activity, and ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase activity (Supplementary Table S4). KEGG pathway analysis identified six conserved significantly enriched pathways across all cultivars: ubiquinone biosynthesis, photosynthesis, glyoxylate metabolism, plant–pathogen interaction, and cysteine/methionine metabolism (Supplementary Table S5).
To further identify the DEGs that are related to the susceptibility and tolerance of citrus in response to HLB, the categories of DEGs related to disease response in the susceptible cultivar group (Tankan mandarin, Newhall orange, Shatangju mandarin, and Gongkan mandarin) and tolerant cultivar group (Eureka lemon and Guanxi pomelo) are described in detail in the following section.
Furthermore, to delineate transcriptional mechanisms underlying HLB susceptibility and tolerance, the categories of DEGs related to disease response in the susceptible cultivar group (Tankan mandarin, Newhall orange, Shatangju mandarin, and Gongkan mandarin) and tolerant cultivar group (Eureka lemon and Guanxi pomelo) are comparatively analyzed in detail in the following section.

2.4. Starch and Sucrose Metabolism

Transcriptional profiling identified 30 DEGs associated with starch and sucrose metabolism across the six citrus cultivars (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S6). Trehalose metabolism-related genes showed pronounced regulation. Six genes encoding trehalose synthesis/degradation enzymes were universally induced in all cultivars, with the exception of a trehalase gene (Cs_ont_5g049990) suppressed in Eureka lemon. Starch synthesis-related genes exhibited divergent expression patterns, with eight genes showing cultivar-specific regulation and minimal differential expression in Eureka lemon. Notably, the putative fructokinase-5 gene (Cs_ont_5g002310) demonstrated consistent upregulation across all genotypes. In starch degradation pathways, the β-amylase 3 gene (Cs_ont_5g043520) was strongly upregulated in tolerant cultivars (Guanxi pomelo and Eureka lemon) but remained unaltered in four susceptible genotypes. Among sucrose metabolism-related genes, three probable sucrose-phosphate synthase genes (Cs_ont_5g024510, Cs_ont_9g014140, Cs_ont_4g002170) were predominantly downregulated in six cultivars, except for partial upregulation in Shatangju mandarin and Guanxi pomelo. Nine sucrose degradation-related genes were mostly upregulated in all cultivars, with only Cs_ont_6g008700 showing downregulation in Eureka lemon and Newhall orange.

2.5. Secondary Metabolism

A total of 65 DEGs associated with secondary metabolism were identified. These DEGs were mainly involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylpropanoid metabolism, and terpenoid biosynthesis (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S7). Shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HST) genes displayed broad activation, with three isoforms (Novel19204, Cs_ont_5g024640, Novel07939) exhibiting strong induction in susceptible Newhall, tolerant Guanxi pomelo, and Eureka lemon. Six phytoalexin biosynthesis genes, including vinorine synthase and chalcone synthase, were markedly upregulated in susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, and Shatangju mandarin). In contrast, an anthranilate N-methyltransferase gene (Novel21132), involved in acridone alkaloid biosynthesis, was downregulated in Newhall orange and strongly suppressed in tolerant Eureka lemon.
Phenylpropanoid metabolism analysis revealed 16 peroxidase-encoding DEGs with divergent regulation among six cultivars. These genes were significantly upregulated in susceptible genotypes but partially downregulated in tolerant varieties. Lignin biosynthesis-related genes, including two 4-coumarate-CoA ligase-like (4CL; Cs_ont_7g022040, Cs_ont_3g029860), one cinnamoyl-CoA reductase 1 (CCR1; Cs_ont_1g011170), and one caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT; Cs_ont_4g009890), were highly induced specifically in Eureka lemon and Guanxi pomelo. Terpenoid biosynthesis genes, including germacrene D synthase and β-farnesene synthase, exhibited genotype-dependent expression, with the maximal induction observed in Gongkan mandarin and Eureka lemon.

2.6. Transcription Factors

A total of 74 transcription factor (TF)-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, primarily belonging to the WRKY, MYB, and bHLH families (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S8). WRKY family TFs exhibited pronounced activation, with 32 members showing significant upregulation, particularly in susceptible Newhall orange and Gongkan mandarin and tolerant Guanxi pomelo. In contrast, MYB family genes displayed reduced enrichment in susceptible genotypes (Newhall orange and Gongkan mandarin) compared to other cultivars. Among bHLH TFs, 21 genes demonstrated context-dependent regulation, including bHLH140 (Cs_ont_6g014390), which was strongly induced in four susceptible cultivars but remained unaltered in tolerant genotypes. Notably, two pathogen-triggered immunity (PTI)-associated genes (Cs_ont_5g018840, Cs_ont_2g004240) were specifically upregulated in Gongkan mandarin and Guanxi pomelo.

2.7. Innate Immune Signaling

A total of 70 DEGs associated with plant innate immune signaling were identified across the six citrus cultivars (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S9). Most DEGs exhibited upregulation, with the highest number observed in the susceptible cultivar Gongkan mandarin. Twenty-two pattern recognition receptor (PRR) genes, including LRR receptor-like serine/threonine-protein kinase FLS2 and EFR, were significantly enriched in Newhall orange, Gongkan mandarin, Guanxi pomelo, and Eureka lemon. Notably, two FLS2 homologs (Cs_ont_2g017050, Novel06645) showed marked induction in the Guanxi pomelo. Eight mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway-related DEGs exhibited differential regulation across six cultivars. A MAPKKK1 gene (Cs_ont_3g032120) was exclusively and strongly induced in the Eureka lemon. Two respiratory burst oxidase homolog (RBOH) genes (Cs_ont_3g015480, Cs_ont_5g038740) were significantly upregulated in all cultivars except the Eureka lemon. Thirty-eight calcium signaling-related DEGs were identified. A total of 8 calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK) genes and 11 calmodulin-like (CML) genes with pronounced upregulation were found in the susceptible Gongkan mandarin. A CDPK8 homolog (Cs_ont_4g0160005) was specifically activated in Guangxi pomelo and Eureka lemon. Eleven DEGs were involved in the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC), with ten upregulated in four susceptible cultivars and Cs_ont_9g027350 strongly downregulated in tolerant Eureka lemon.

2.8. Phytohormone Metabolism

A total of 88 DEGs associated with phytohormone metabolism were identified across the six citrus cultivars, with distinct activation patterns observed between the susceptible and tolerant genotypes (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S10). Susceptible cultivars demonstrated broader hormonal pathway activation, showing significantly higher DEG enrichment compared to their tolerant counterparts. These DEGs spanned key biosynthesis and signaling pathways for auxin, abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, salicylic acid (SA), cytokinin, jasmonic acid (JA), and gibberellin (GA).
Auxin-related regulation was particularly prominent in susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Newhall orange, Gongkan mandarin, and Shatangju mandarin), with 15 DEGs including indole-3-acetate-amide synthetase genes and auxin-responsive proteins (auxin-induced proteins and auxin-binding proteins) predominantly upregulated. The ethylene pathway emerged as the most substantially regulated, with 34 DEGs encompassing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) synthases and ethylene-responsive transcription factors being significantly enriched in Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, and Shatangju mandarin.
SA-related regulation exhibited cultivar-specific patterns, with three salicylic acid-binding protein (SABP; Cs_ont_1g025610, Cs_ont_1g025560, Cs_ont_1g025590) genes showing distinct activation. Cs_ont_1g025560 and Cs_ont_1g025590 were upregulated in Newhall orange and Shatangju mandarin, respectively, while other SABPs were downregulated. NPR3/4 family members demonstrated divergent expression profiles, including Cs_ont_7g014520 upregulation in Gongkan mandarin, four homologs (Cs_ont_7g014380, Cs_ont_7g014490, Cs_ont_7g014470, Cs_ont_7g014480) activated in Guanxi pomelo, and four members (Cs_ont_7g014520, Cs_ont_7g014490, Cs_ont_7g014440, Cs_ont_7g014600) suppressed in Eureka lemon. Additionally, the SA-responsive transcription factor TGA1 (Cs_ont_1g001530) was exclusively upregulated in Guanxi pomelo. Cytokinin biosynthesis genes (Cs_ont_2g011300, Cs_ont_8g022430) were specifically activated in Newhall orange, Shatangju mandarin, and Guanxi pomelo.
JA signaling components, particularly four TIFY transcription factors (Cs_ont_1g019000, Cs_ont_1g018990, Cs_ont_4g022240, Cs_ont_7g027580), showed exclusive upregulation in Gongkan mandarin. GA-related DEGs displayed preferential enrichment in susceptible cultivars, with minimal activation observed in tolerant genotypes Guanxi pomelo and Eureka lemon.

2.9. Cell Wall Metabolism

A total of 87 DEGs linked to cell wall metabolism were identified across the six citrus cultivars, revealing distinct regulatory patterns between the susceptible and tolerant genotypes (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S11). Cell wall synthesis-related genes were broadly enriched in susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, Shatangju mandarin, and Newhall orange), though partial downregulation occurred specifically in Newhall orange. Key synthesis components, including Galactoside 2-alpha-L-fucosyltransferase, cellulose synthase A catalytic subunit, cellulose synthase-like protein, COBRA-like protein, Galacturonosyltransferase, and UDP-glucuronate–xylan alpha-glucuronosyltransferase, were upregulated in four susceptible genotypes.
Cell degradation pathways showed contrasting regulation, with 15 pectinesterase-associated DEGs identified. Notably, seven pectinesterase genes (Cs_ont_7g013970, Cs_ont_5g006740, Cs_ont_1g027570, Cs_ont_5g001580, Cs_ont_6g022780, Cs_ont_8g021550, Cs_ont_6g011630) were specifically enriched in Eureka lemon. Nine xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) genes exhibited predominant upregulation in three susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, and Shatangju mandarin), indicating active hemicellulose remodeling.
Structural cell wall protein-related DEGs displayed cultivar-specific divergence. DEGs encoding expansins, fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins, and proline-rich proteins were predominantly downregulated in Newhall orange, Gongkan mandarin, and Guanxi pomelo, whereas Shatangju mandarin showed a significant upregulation of these structural components. This dichotomy suggested genotype-specific strategies for cell wall reinforcement or flexibility during HLB responses.

3. Discussion

Starch accumulation, a hallmark physiological response in HLB-affected plants [16], has been hypothesized to drive leaf mottling and chlorosis through excessive starch deposition disrupting thylakoid integrity or sucrose/glucose accumulation impairing cellular homeostasis [17]. Previous studies have documented the HLB-induced suppression of starch degradation pathways, particularly the downregulation of key catabolic genes (BAM3, MEX1, DPE2) in susceptible C. sinensis genotypes during disease progression [18,19]. Our transcriptomic analysis revealed cultivar-specific regulatory patterns in starch metabolism. The β-amylase 3 gene BAM3 (Cs_ont_5g043520), a critical starch degradation enzyme, showed pronounced upregulation exclusively in tolerant cultivars, Guanxi pomelo and Eureka lemon. This enhanced transcriptional activation was contrasted with the suppressed starch catabolism pathways observed in susceptible genotypes, suggesting that elevated BAM3 expression may bolster starch breakdown capacity in tolerant varieties. Such differential regulation could mitigate chloroplast dysfunction by reducing starch accumulation, thereby attenuating leaf chlorosis in HLB-tolerant cultivars.
Transcriptional profiling revealed divergent defense strategies between HLB-susceptible and -tolerant citrus cultivars, with susceptible genotypes exhibiting a quantitative amplification of TF activation compared to the restrained transcriptional reprogramming observed in tolerant varieties. As master regulators of plant metabolic adjustments, TFs orchestrated both the magnitude and specificity of defense pathway activation [20]. Notably, WRKY family members, key mediators of immune transcriptomes in Arabidopsis through MAP kinase-dependent phosphorylation cascades triggered by pathogen-associated molecular patterns [21,22,23], were markedly enriched in susceptible cultivars (Newhall orange, Gongkan mandarin, and Guanxi pomelo), suggesting the hyperactivation of immune signaling pathways. In contrast, MYB TFs, which integrated defense networks and directly regulated flavonoid biosynthesis genes [24,25], showed limited activation in Newhall orange and Gongkan mandarin. This paradoxical divergence in TF engagement (WRKY amplification vs. MYB suppression) underscored unresolved questions about cultivar-specific regulatory mechanisms, particularly regarding the coordination of flavonoid-mediated defenses. A striking genotype-specific pattern emerged with the exclusive upregulation of bHLH140 (Cs_ont_6g014390), a stress-responsive flavonoid regulator [24], in four susceptible cultivars (Figure 4; Supplementary Table S8). Given bHLH TFs’ established role in fine-tuning secondary metabolite production, this susceptibility-linked activation raised compelling questions about whether bHLH140 induction represents a maladaptive response or failed defense modulation, a hypothesis requiring validation through targeted functional studies.
Comparative transcriptomic profiling revealed distinct immune strategies in citrus cultivars responding to CLas infection, with susceptible genotypes exhibiting hypersensitive signaling and tolerant varieties deploying targeted defense activation. While both groups initiated immune responses, tolerant cultivars demonstrated a refined regulation of key pathways associated with HLB resistance. The primary defense layer, mediated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), showed cultivar-specific activation. PRRs contained surface-localized receptor-like kinases (RLKs) with ligand-binding extracellular domains and intracellular kinase domains or receptor-like proteins (RLPs) lacking signaling domains [26]. Tolerant Guanxi pomelo uniquely upregulated two FLS2 homologs (Cs_ont_2g017050, Novel06645) encoding flagellin-sensing receptors, suggesting enhanced PTI activation through the recognition of bacterial epitopes like flg22 and EF-Tu, a mechanism conserved in Arabidopsis [27,28]. These RLKs contrasted with the limited PRR activation observed in susceptible cultivars. CLas-induced ROS overproduction, typically mediated by RBOHs [13,29], displayed genotype-specific regulation. Although two RBOH genes (Cs_ont_3g015480, Cs_ont_5g038740) were upregulated broadly, their subdued expression in tolerant Eureka lemon correlated with restrained ROS accumulation, a potential adaptation to minimize oxidative tissue damage while maintaining defense signaling. Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), critical transducers of immune signals [30,31], showed limited enrichment in susceptible cultivars (Newhall orange and Shatangju mandarin), likely contributing to their attenuated defense responses. Strikingly, CNGC (Cs_ont_9g027350), which mediated Ca2+ influx linked to oxidative bursts and pathogen-induced cell death [32,33], was markedly downregulated in Eureka lemon (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S9). This suppression likely stabilized Ca2+ homeostasis, reducing necrotic symptom progression, a hallmark of HLB tolerance.
Phytohormones served as central regulators of plant development and defense against pathogen infections [34]. Comparative analysis revealed the heightened activation of hormone-related pathways in susceptible cultivars, with tolerant varieties exhibiting fewer enriched genes in these pathways. Susceptible genotypes, including Tankan mandarin, Newhall orange, and Shatangju mandarin, predominantly upregulated ethylene biosynthesis and signaling genes in response to CLas infection, while Gongkan mandarin activated both ethylene and jasmonic acid pathways. In contrast, the tolerant cultivar Eureka lemon triggered SA-mediated defense transcription, whereas Guanxi pomelo showed no distinct hormonal enrichment. Ethylene-related genes were markedly upregulated in three susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, Shatangju mandarin). Pathogen-induced ethylene accumulation often exacerbates disease progression by accelerating senescence [35,36], consistent with prior observations in CLas-infected sweet orange [18]. This suggested that ethylene hyperactivation in susceptible genotypes may facilitate HLB symptom development. SA, a critical defense hormone, transduced extracellular PAMP signals to activate defense gene transcription [37]. Notably, multiple NPR3 genes, NPR4 genes, and SA receptors that negatively regulated defense responses were downregulated in Eureka lemon. SA potentiates immunity by suppressing NPR3 and NPR4 activity, thereby derepressing downstream defense regulators [38]. This regulatory mechanism likely underpinned Eureka lemon’s SA pathway activation and subsequent defense gene induction.
The plant cell wall, primarily composed of polysaccharides (cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin), serves as a critical physical barrier against pathogen invasion [39]. The key genes involved in wall reinforcement, cellulose synthase A catalytic subunit, cellulose synthase-like protein, and COBRA-like protein, were markedly enriched in four susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, Shatangju mandarin, and Newhall orange), suggesting an enhanced synthesis of structural polysaccharides as a compensatory defense mechanism [40,41]. Pectin, the predominant polysaccharide in dicot cell walls, requires precise regulation by pectin methylesterases (PMEs) and their inhibitors (PMEIs) to maintain cell wall integrity. PME-mediated de-esterification of homogalacturonan was essential for pectin crosslinking and wall rigidity, a process implicated in antibacterial and antiviral defenses [42,43]. Notably, Eureka lemon exhibited a pronounced enrichment in PME-encoding genes compared to other cultivars, potentially stabilizing cell wall architecture to impede pathogen penetration. Conversely, genes encoding xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH) proteins, enzymes associated with wall loosening, were upregulated in susceptible cultivars (Tankan mandarin, Gongkan mandarin, Shatangju mandarin) (Figure 5; Supplementary Table S11). As XTH activity facilitated cell wall remodeling during pathogen invasion [41], this dysregulation may compromise structural defenses, creating entry points for CLas colonization.
Our identification of defense-related pathways and key regulators in HLB-affected citrus aligned with strategies used against other major vascular diseases, such as mal secco disease (caused by Plenodomus tracheiphilus) in lemon across the Mediterranean basin and the Black Sea region [44,45]. Similarly to how mal secco management in citrus relies on deploying tolerant rootstock–scion combinations to restrict xylem colonization [46,47], our identification of cell wall reinforcement and salicylic acid-mediated signaling pathways provided clear molecular targets for breeding HLB-tolerant cultivars. Integrating these candidate mechanisms into marker-assisted selection will accelerate the translation of transcriptomic discoveries into disease-resilient varieties.
Although our transcriptomic analyses had identified candidate host genes involved in HLB tolerance, functional validation, such as CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out or transgenic overexpression in citrus, will be required to establish causal roles. Additionally, future studies should include additional genotypes within each tolerance category and assess variability across multiple tolerant and susceptible cultivars to distinguish generalizable tolerance mechanisms from cultivar-specific effects. This study focused on global transcriptomic contrasts between tolerant and susceptible groups and did not correlate gene expression with detailed physiological or disease severity phenotypes. Addressing these points in follow-up experiments, such as longitudinal sampling, targeted functional assays, and integrated phenotyping, will be essential to translate our findings into breeding strategies for HLB tolerance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Six commercially important citrus cultivars were collected from major citrus-producing regions in South China, including the following: Gongkan mandarin (Citrus reticulata cv. Gongkan, Zhaoqing, Guangdong Province), Tankan mandarin (C. reticulata cv. Tankan, Chaozhou, Guangdong Province), Shatangju mandarin (C. reticulata Blanco cv. Shatangju, Huizhou, Guangdong Province), Eureka lemon (C. limon cv Eureka, Heyuan, Guangdong Province), Guanxi pomelo (C. maxima cv Guanxi Yu, Meizhou, Guangdong Province), and Newhall orange (C. sinensis Osbeck cv. Newhall, Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province). According to a previous study [6], C. limon and C. maxima were more tolerant to HLB compared to C. reticulata Blanco and C. sinensis. All leaf samples were taken from the fully expanded leaves of the current-season vegetative flush. For each cultivar, symptomatic leaves exhibiting HLB-associated chlorosis/mottling and asymptomatic leaves from healthy trees were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Three biological replicates per cultivar (healthy vs. infected) were processed for RNA-Seq.

4.2. DNA and RNA Extraction

For DNA extraction, fresh leaf midrib tissues (100 mg) were homogenized using an MP FastPrep®-24 grinder (MP Biomedicals, Irvine, CA, USA) at 4 m/s for 1 min. Total DNA was isolated using the EZNA HP Plant DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). For RNA isolation, 250 mg pooled midrib tissues from three leaves per biological replicate was processed with the EZNA Total RNA Kit I (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). Nucleic acid yields were quantified via a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA integrity was validated by capillary electrophoresis (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.3. RNA Sequencing and Transcriptomic Analysis cDNA Library Production

All cDNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina-compatible; New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 3000 platform (150 bp paired-end reads; Novogene, Beijing, China). Raw reads were filtered for quality and aligned to the Citrus sinensis reference genome (GCA_022201045.1) [48] via Tophat2 with ≤2 mismatches [49]. Gene expression quantification was performed using HTSeq v0.61, with normalized RPKM values calculated for cross-sample comparisons. Differential expressed genes (DEGs) between CLas-infected and control groups was identified by DEGseq with the cut-off values set as |log2(fold change)| ≥ 1.5 and q < 0.005 [50]. The functional annotation of significant DEGs included Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment via GOseq (FDR < 0.05) [51] and KEGG pathway analysis using KOBAS 2.0 [52].

4.4. CLas Quantification

CLas pathogen load was determined through TaqMan qPCR using the CLas4G/HLBr primer–probe system (CLas4G: AGTCGAGCGCGTATGCGAAT; HLBr: GCGTTATCCCGTAGAAAAAGGTAG; HLBp: FAM-AGACGGGTGAGTAACGCG-BHQ) established in prior work [53]. Reactions (20 μL) contained 10 μL PerfectStart® II Probe qPCR SuperMix, 1 μL genomic DNA (25 ng), 0.4 μL of each primer (10 μM), 0.2 μL probe (10 μM), and 8 μL ddH2O. All PCRs were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect system. Thermal cycling involved initial denaturation (95 °C, 2 min), followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 58 °C for 30 s (fluorescence acquisition). Amplification data were analyzed via CFX Manager 2.1 software with automated baseline/threshold determination.

4.5. Gene Expression Validation

Ten DEGs spanning functional categories including cell wall metabolism (Cs_ont_5g039810, Cs_ont_2g000090), secondary metabolites (Cs_ont_6g005240), transcription factors (Cs_ont_6g014390, Cs_ont_5g018840), innate immune signaling (Cs_ont_2g017050, Cs_ont_3g015480, Cs_ont_9g027350), phytohormone metabolism (Cs_ont_9g000810), and starch and sucrose metabolism (Cs_ont_5g002310) were selected for RT-qPCR validation. All primer sets are listed in Supplementary Table S12. Utilizing the original RNA samples from transcriptome profiling, cDNA synthesis was performed with TransScript® One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). qPCRs (20 μL) employed TransStart® Green qPCR SuperMix (TransGen Biotech), 1 μL cDNA, 0.4 μL gene-specific primers (10 μM; Supplementary Table S12), and 8 μL ddH2O, processed on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect system under standardized conditions: 95 °C/30 s initiation; 40 cycles of 95 °C/10 s; and 60 °C/30 s (fluorescence acquisition at 60 °C). Normalized expression (GAPDH reference) was calculated via the 2−ΔΔCt method, with CLas-infected/mock-control fold changes (Log2) compared to the RNA-Seq results. The expression profiles of ten selected genes generated by RT-qPCR were consistent with RNA-Seq data, indicating the reliability of RNA-Seq analysis in this study (Supplementary Figure S1).

5. Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of six major citrus cultivars (four susceptible, two tolerant) in South China, revealing genotype-specific responses to the HLB RNA sequencing of symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves uncovered via extensive transcriptional reprogramming, with DEGs involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, secondary metabolism, transcriptional regulation, innate immune signaling, phytohormone pathways, and cell wall metabolism. Notably, tolerant cultivars (C. limon and C. maxima) exhibited an enhanced activation of starch degradation genes, such as β-amylase 3, which may mitigate chloroplast dysfunction by reducing excessive starch accumulation. In contrast, susceptible cultivars (C. reticulata and C. sinensis) displayed a hyperactivation of defense-related pathways, particularly ethylene biosynthesis and WRKY transcription factors, potentially exacerbating disease symptoms. The differential regulation of pattern recognition receptors, calcium signaling components, and cell wall-modifying enzymes further underscored the distinct defense strategies employed by tolerant versus susceptible genotypes. These insights lay a foundation for identifying molecular markers and targets for breeding HLB-tolerant varieties. By mapping time-course expression profiles, performing gene-level manipulations, and linking transcriptomic changes to physiological outcomes, future studies will build upon this work to accelerate the development of robust, HLB-resistant citrus cultivars.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26157359/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C., F.F., T.C., X.D. and Z.Z.; methodology, X.C., F.F., T.C., J.W. and Z.Z.; software, X.C., F.F. and Z.Z.; validation, X.C., F.F., T.C., X.D. and Z.Z.; investigation, X.C., J.W., X.D. and Z.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, X.C. and T.C.; writing—review and editing, X.C., F.F., T.C., X.D. and Z.Z.; supervision, J.W., X.D. and Z.Z.; funding acquisition, X.D. and Z.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2024YFD2300800), Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams (2024CXTD10), and China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-26).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All sequence reads generated in this project are available in the NCBI Short Read Archive under BioProject PRJNA990698.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bové, J.M. Huanglongbing: A destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Pathol. 2006, 88, 7–37. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zheng, Z.; Chen, J.C.; Deng, X.L. Historical perspectives, management, and current research of citrus HLB in Guangdong Province of China, where the disease has been endemic for over a hundred years. Phytopathology 2018, 108, 1224–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jagoueix, S.; Bové, J.M.; Garnier, M. The phloem-limited bacterium of greening disease of citrus is a member of the α subdivision of the Proteobacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1994, 44, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Teixeira, D.D.C.; Saillard, C.; Eveillard, S.; Danet, J.L.; Costa, P.I.D.; Ayres, A.J.; Bové, J.M. ‘Candidatus Liberibacter americanus’, associated with citrus huanglongbing (greening disease) in São Paulo State, Brazil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 1857–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Folimonova, S.Y.; Robertson, C.J.; Garnsey, S.M.; Gowda, S.; Dawson, W.O. Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under different conditions. Phytopathology 2009, 99, 1346–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gao, C.; Li, C.; Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Guo, J.; Mao, J.; Fang, F.; Wang, C.; Deng, X.; et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling of susceptible and tolerant citrus species at early and late stage of infection by “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus”. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1191029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Miles, G.P.; Stover, E.; Ramadugu, C.; Keremane, M.L.; Lee, R.F. Apparent tolerance to huanglongbing in citrus and citrus-related germplasm. HortScience 2017, 52, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, B.; Yuan, T.; Lu, Z.; Huang, R.; He, J.; Yang, K.; Wu, Q.; Ai, W.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, W.; et al. “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” Infection Induces Citric Acid Accumulation and Immune Responses Mediated by the Transcription Factor CitPH4. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2025, 26, e70062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, G.; Hu, Y.; Li, F.; Zuo, X.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Li, R. Genome-wide characterization of heavy metal-associated isoprenylated plant protein gene family from Citrus sinensis in response to huanglongbing. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1369883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tian, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Deng, X.; Zhang, B.; Meng, Y.; Wu, L.; Chen, H.; Zhong, Y.; Chen, W. Genome-Wide Identification of the DnaJ Gene Family in Citrus and Functional Characterization of ClDJC24 in Response to Citrus Huanglongbing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, P.; Yang, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Gao, K.; Wu, J.; Zhu, C.; Yin, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, Q.; et al. Targeted MYC2 stabilization confers citrus Huanglongbing resistance. Science 2025, 388, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wei, X.; Mira, A.; Yu, Q.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr. The mechanism of citrus host defense response repression at early stages of infection by feeding of Diaphorina citri transmitting Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 635153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, W.; Pang, Z.; Huang, X.; Xu, J.; Pandey, S.S.; Li, J.; Achor, D.S.; Vasconcelos, F.N.C.; Hendrich, C.; Huang, Y.; et al. Citrus Huanglongbing is a pathogen-triggered immune disease that can be mitigated with antioxidants and gibberellin. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ribeiro, C.; Xu, J.; Hendrich, C.; Pandey, S.S.; Yu, Q.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr.; Wang, N. Seasonal transcriptome profiling of susceptible and tolerant citrus cultivars to citrus Huanglongbing. Phytopathology 2023, 113, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Balan, B.; Ibáñez, A.M.; Dandekar, A.M.; Caruso, T.; Martinelli, F. Identifying host molecular features strongly linked with responses to huanglongbing disease in citrus leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schneider, H. Anatomy of greening-disease sweet orange shoots. Phytopathology 1968, 58, 1155–1160. [Google Scholar]
  17. Schaffer, A.A.; Liu, K.C.; Goldschmidt, E.E.; Boyer, C.D.; Goren, R. Citrus leaf chlorosis induced by sink removal: Starch, nitrogen, and chloroplast ultrastructure. J. Plant Physiol. 1986, 124, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fan, J.; Chen, C.; Yu, Q.; Khalaf, A.; Achor, D.S.; Brlansky, R.H.; Moore, G.A.; Li, Z.; Gmitter, F.G., Jr. Comparative transcriptional and anatomical analyses of tolerant rough lemon and susceptible sweet orange in response to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ infection. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 1396–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, Y.; Su, H.N.; Huang, A.J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.A.; Liu, J.X.; Zhou, C.Y. Effects of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection on sugar metabolism in sweet orange leaves. Nongye Kexue 2015, 48, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Iwase, A.; Matsui, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M. Manipulation of plant metabolic pathways by transcription factors. Plant Biotechnol. 2009, 26, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eulgem, T.; Somssich, I.E. Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 366–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Deslandes, L.; Olivier, J.; Theulières, F.; Hirsch, J.; Feng, D.X.; Bittner-Eddy, P.; Beynon, J.; Marco, Y. Resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in Arabidopsis thaliana is conferred by the recessive RRS1-R gene, a member of a novel family of resistance genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 2404–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Asai, T.; Tena, G.; Plotnikova, J.; Willmann, M.R.; Chiu, W.L.; Gomez-Gomez, L.; Boller, T.; Ausubel, F.M.; Sheen, J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature 2002, 415, 977–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naik, J.; Misra, P.; Trivedi, P.K.; Pandey, A. Molecular components associated with the regulation of flavonoid biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2022, 317, 111196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yu, Y.; Cui, N.; Yu, G.; Zhao, H.; Meng, X.; Fan, H. The pivotal role of MYB transcription factors in plant disease resistance. Planta 2023, 258, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Macho, A.P.; Zipfel, C. Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Mol. Cell 2014, 54, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chinchilla, D.; Bauer, Z.; Regenass, M.; Boller, T.; Felix, G. The Arabidopsis receptor kinase FLS2 binds flg22 and determines the specificity of flagellin perception. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 465–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zipfel, C.; Kunze, G.; Chinchilla, D.; Caniard, A.; Jones, J.D.; Boller, T.; Felix, G. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 2006, 125, 749–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bilal, M.S.; Paul, G.; Yu, Z.; Xu, L.; Cheng, T.; Cheng, B.; Aslam, M.N.; Baig, A.; Zhao, H. Comparative Transcriptome and sRNAome Analysis Suggest Coordinated Citrus Immune Responses against Huanglongbing Disease. Plants 2024, 13, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bredow, M.; Monaghan, J. Regulation of plant immune signaling by calcium-dependent protein kinases. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2019, 32, 6–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zhang, J.; Sun, L.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Li, X.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, J. A calcium-dependent protein kinase regulates the defense response in Citrus sinensis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2024, 37, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moeder, W.; Urquhart, W.; Ung, H.; Yoshioka, K. The role of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels in plant immunity. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 442–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mardi, M.; Farsad, L.K.; Gharechahi, J.; Salekdeh, G.H. In-depth transcriptome sequencing of Mexican lime trees infected with Candidatus Phytoplasma aurantifolia. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lund, S.T.; Stall, R.E.; Klee, H.J. Ethylene regulates the susceptible response to pathogen infection in tomato. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Panter, S.N.; Jones, D.A. Age-related resistance to plant pathogens. Adv. Bot. Res. 2002, 38, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vidhyasekaran, P. Salicylic acid signaling in plant innate immunity. In Plant Hormone Signaling Systems in Plant Innate Immunity; Vidhyasekaran, P., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 27–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ding, Y.; Sun, T.; Ao, K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y. Opposite roles of salicylic acid receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in transcriptional regulation of plant immunity. Cell 2018, 173, 1454–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Juge, N. Plant protein inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taylor, N.G.; Laurie, S.; Turner, S.R. Multiple cellulose synthase catalytic subunits are required for cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 2529–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hu, Y.; Zhong, X.; Liu, X.; Lou, B.; Zhou, C.; Wang, X. Comparative transcriptome analysis unveils the tolerance mechanisms of Citrus hystrix in response to ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ infection. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0189229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bethke, G.; Grundman, R.E.; Sreekanta, S.; Truman, W.; Katagiri, F.; Glazebrook, J. Arabidopsis PECTIN METHYLESTERASEs contribute to immunity against Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1093–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Xiong, Y.; Ren, X.X.; Zhu, H.; Ren, X.Y.; Pan, Z.Y.; Su, T. Recent Progress in the Functional Research of PMEIs. China Biotechnol. 2022, 42, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nigro, F.; Ippolito, A.; Salerno, M.G. Mal secco disease of citrus: A journey through a century of research. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 93, 523–560. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ben-Hamo, M.; Ezra, D.; Krasnov, H.; Blank, L. Spatial and temporal dynamics of Mal Secco disease spread in lemon orchards in Israel. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Russo, R.; Caruso, M.; Arlotta, C.; Lo Piero, A.R.; Nicolosi, E.; Di Silvestro, S. Identification of field tolerance and resistance to mal secco disease in a citrus germplasm collection in sicily. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abbate, L.; Mercati, F.; Del Bosco, S.F. An overview on citrus mal secco disease: Approaches and strategies to select tolerant genotypes in C. limon. Crop Breed. Genet. Genom. 2019, 1, e190018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; He, J.; Jiang, X.; He, F.; Lu, Z.; Yang, S.; Chen, P.; Yu, H.; et al. Somatic variations led to the selection of acidic and acidless orange cultivars. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kim, D.; Pertea, G.; Trapnell, C.; Pimentel, H.; Kelley, R.; Salzberg, S.L. TopHat2: Accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, L.; Feng, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X. DEGseq: An R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 136–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Young, M.D.; Wakefield, M.J.; Smyth, G.K.; Oshlack, A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Xie, C.; Mao, X.; Huang, J.; Ding, Y.; Wu, J.; Dong, S.; Kong, L.; Gao, G.; Li, C.; Wei, L. KOBAS 2.0: A web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, W316–W322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bao, M.L.; Zheng, Z.; Sun, X.A.; Chen, J.C.; Deng, X.L. Enhancing PCR capacity to detect ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ utilizing whole genome sequence information. Plant Dis. 2020, 104, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Representative leaf phenotypes and CLas quantification in six citrus cultivars. CLas titers measured by qPCR in leaves (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Figure 1. Representative leaf phenotypes and CLas quantification in six citrus cultivars. CLas titers measured by qPCR in leaves (mean ± SD, n = 3).
Ijms 26 07359 g001
Figure 2. Statistical plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in six citrus varieties in response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection.
Figure 2. Statistical plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in six citrus varieties in response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection.
Ijms 26 07359 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in six varieties in response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in six varieties in response to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection.
Ijms 26 07359 g003
Figure 4. Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, secondary metabolism, and transcription factors.
Figure 4. Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, secondary metabolism, and transcription factors.
Ijms 26 07359 g004
Figure 5. Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in innate immune signaling, phytohormone metabolism, and cell wall metabolism.
Figure 5. Heatmaps of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) involved in innate immune signaling, phytohormone metabolism, and cell wall metabolism.
Ijms 26 07359 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Fang, F.; Chen, T.; Wu, J.; Zheng, Z.; Deng, X. Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Key Molecular Pathways Underlying Huanglongbing Tolerance and Susceptibility in Six Citrus Cultivars. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157359

AMA Style

Chen X, Fang F, Chen T, Wu J, Zheng Z, Deng X. Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Key Molecular Pathways Underlying Huanglongbing Tolerance and Susceptibility in Six Citrus Cultivars. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(15):7359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiaohong, Fang Fang, Tingting Chen, Jinghua Wu, Zheng Zheng, and Xiaoling Deng. 2025. "Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Key Molecular Pathways Underlying Huanglongbing Tolerance and Susceptibility in Six Citrus Cultivars" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 15: 7359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157359

APA Style

Chen, X., Fang, F., Chen, T., Wu, J., Zheng, Z., & Deng, X. (2025). Transcriptomic Reprogramming and Key Molecular Pathways Underlying Huanglongbing Tolerance and Susceptibility in Six Citrus Cultivars. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(15), 7359. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop