Next Article in Journal
Study of Retinoic Acid-Induced Osteoarthritis: Integrating RNA-Sequencing, Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Experimental Validation
Previous Article in Journal
ALDH2 Enzyme Deficiency in Diabetic Cardiomyopathy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Future-Oriented Biomaterials Based on Natural Polymer Resources: Characteristics, Application Innovations, and Development Trends

by
Oscar Amponsah
1,
Prince Sungdewie Adama Nopuo
2,
Felista Adrehem Manga
3,
Nicole Bianca Catli
4 and
Karolina Labus
1,*
1
Department of Micro, Nano and Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. C.K. Norwida 4/6, 50-373 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Sciences and Technology, University of Castilla-La-Mancha, C. Altagracia, 50, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain
3
Department of Chemical Process Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, ul. C.K. Norwida 4/6, 50-373 Wrocław, Poland
4
Department of Separation Science, School of Engineering Science, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Mukkulankatu 19, 15210 Lahti, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(12), 5518; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125518
Submission received: 12 May 2025 / Revised: 2 June 2025 / Accepted: 5 June 2025 / Published: 9 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Polymeric Biomaterials)

Abstract

This review comprehensively explores natural polymer-based materials, focusing on their characteristics, applications, and innovations across different sectors, including medicine, the environment, energy, textiles, and construction. With increasing concern about resource depletion and pollution, biomaterials offer a sustainable alternative to fossil-derived products. The review highlights polysaccharide-based and protein-based biomaterials, as well as others, such as polyisoprene, rosin, and hyaluronic acid. Emphasis is laid on their compositions and attractive characteristics, including biocompatibility, biodegradability, and functional versatility. Moreover, the review deeply discusses the ability of natural polymers to form hydrogels, aerogels, films, nanocomposites, etc., enhanced by additives for innovative applications. Future development trends of biomaterials in biomedicine, sustainable materials, environmental biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing are also explored. Their growing potential in these sectors is driven by research advances in emerging technologies such as 3D bioprinting, nanotechnology, and hybrid material innovation, which are proven to enhance the performance, functionality, and scalability of biopolymers. The review suggests several strategies, including improvement in processing techniques and material engineering to overcome limitations associated with biomaterials, thereby reinforcing their suitability and role in a circular and sustainable economy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Resource depletion, climate change, and waste accumulation are environmental issues that are largely becoming more relevant nowadays. Material utilization has tripled within the last 50 years with a steady growth of about 2.3% per year, and material source extraction could reach 160 billion tonnes at the current rate. This is especially concerning as resource extraction and processing are responsible for 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions [1]. These issues, along with consumer demand for eco-friendly solutions, are the key drivers for the intensified global push for the industry’s reduced reliance on and preference for petroleum-based materials. Bio-based materials, defined to be materials that are fully or partially of biological origins [2], are central to the shift from a linear economy to a circular bioeconomy which prioritizes the utilization of renewable biological resources for the development of sustainable products and services [3]. The suitability of bio-based materials as a sustainable alternative to fossil fuel-based materials is further underscored by the natural source abundance, renewability, and low-impact production processes, contributing to an overall lower carbon footprint [4]. Furthermore, many bio-based materials are biodegradable, which can significantly reduce the environmental impact linked with plastic waste [5,6].
Their application spans a multitude of industries including medical, packaging, energy storage, textiles, and construction [7]. The urgent need for bio-based materials drives technological innovations, leading to the significant advancements witnessed in the last decade by the material sector. For instance, a common polysaccharide like starch has been transformed into bio-based materials like bioplastics and hydrogels which can be extensively used in the biomedical sector as a drug delivery system, implants, and tissue engineering [8,9], in the food sector as a biodegradable and recyclable food packaging alternative to single-use plastics [10], as well as for bioremediation [11]. Natural fibers such as hemp or flax blended with biodegradable resins form biocomposites that find their usability in industries requiring materials with enhanced mechanical, thermal, and functional characteristics such as in automotives and sports [12,13]. The valorization of agricultural waste, such as pomelo peel, into high-performance carbon materials for energy storage applications further illustrates the versatility of biological resources in creating sustainable solutions [14]. The construction industry also benefits from the bio-based sector through innovations like flame-retardant additives derived from sugarcane bagasse for insulation materials [15] and concrete from hemp [16]. These innovations reflect the growing acknowledgment of bio-based materials as sustainable and practical alternatives across diverse industries, signaling a fundamental shift toward greener production practices.
Despite their vast potential, the widespread adoption of bio-based materials is not without challenges, particularly in the aspect of land use and associated environmental impacts. A comprehensive assessment of a bio-based material’s environmental footprint is essential to achieve an accurate and unbiased comparison with its fossil fuel-based counterpart, typically accomplished with the aid of life cycle assessments (LCA). Weiss et al. [17] emphasized the importance of such evaluations, noting that drawing general conclusions about bio-based materials is difficult [17]. While significant reductions in energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are observed, bio-based materials, unfortunately, can contribute to increased eutrophication and stratospheric ozone depletion, primarily due to the use of nutrients and chemicals during biomass cultivation. Additionally, land use impacts such as biodiversity loss, soil nutrient depletion, land conversion, and erosion are critical considerations. Bio-based materials can likewise face economic and logistical barriers. Feedstock seasonality, avoiding negative impacts on food security, and supply chain limitations can severely limit scaled-up production. Moreover, the specialized processing techniques and raw materials further inflate the cost and complexity of manufacturing these bio-based materials [18].
However, these constraints should not be viewed as reasons to abandon the shift to bio-based materials in favor of conventional petroleum-based products but rather as opportunities for innovation and progress. This is evident and will be presented in detail in this review, which comprehensively explores the current state of bio-based materials, examining their key characteristics, sources, and diverse applications. It also highlights innovations across multiple sectors, from packaging and automotive to textiles and construction, providing insights into how bio-based materials are transforming industries. In analyzing the latest developments and trends, this article emphasizes the role of bio-based materials in advancing a more sustainable and circular bioeconomy. The field of biomaterials is rich with potential and offers numerous research opportunities in both material science and production technologies. With the right policies and investments, the bio-based materials sector can drive significant academic and economic growth while supporting global sustainability goals. In that regard, ultimately, this review aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers, industry professionals, and policymakers advocating for the development and widespread adoption of bio-based materials as a central pillar for sustainable material solutions.

2. Characteristics of Biomaterials

Natural-based polymeric materials, classified mainly as proteins or polysaccharides, have gained great attention in recent years, mainly due to their potential to replace petroleum hydrocarbon-derived plastics in a variety of applications. These biomaterials have exhibited good chemical stability, structural versatility, biocompatibility, and high availability with diverse applications in areas such as tissue engineering, drug delivery and wound healing, energy materials fabrication, and processing. Such materials are usually obtained from plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, and algae sources and can also be engineered to improve their structural and functional properties. Some common examples of biomaterials are classified as shown in Figure 1.

2.1. Polysaccharide-Based Materials

2.1.1. Cellulose

Cellulose is considered the most abundant natural biopolymer, with an annual production of 250 billion tonnes [23]. It features an overall crystalline structure composed of β-D-glucose units linked with β-1,4-glycosidic bonds and is rich in reactive hydroxyl groups (Figure 2). Cellulose can be derived from either plant sources (plant cellulose (PC)) or bacterial sources (bacterial cellulose (BC)). PC, the primary structural component of plant cell walls, is obtained from lignocellulosic sources. On the other hand, Tanskul et al. [24] reported that BC can be isolated from over 59 strains of bacteria from ripe fruits and vegetables, including Gram-negative bacteria (Gluconacetobacter xylinus, Agrobacterium, and Rhizobium) and Gram-positive bacteria (Sarcina) [24].
PC and BC differ significantly in terms of fiber properties and purity. PC fibers have diameters of 13–22 µm, typically contain impurities like residual hemicellulose, and are less crystalline, with a crystallinity index of around 44–65% due to the high proportion of cellulose I β [25,26]. In contrast, BC is highly pure and free of biogenic contaminants [27], which grants it superior physicochemical properties. These include high specific surface area (fibers with diameter 20–100 nm and high aspect ratio), porosity, mechanical strength (Young’s modulus 15–18 GPa), degree of crystallinity (up to 80%) and polymerization (1000–20,000), high water-holding capacity (over 100 times of its weight), and biodegradability [19,28].
Cellulose is versatile and has applications spanning multiple industries such as pulp and paper, food, textiles, biocomposites and bioplastics, biomedical, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and nanotechnology [26,29]. Particularly, Ventura-Cruz and Tecante [30] highlighted the potential of agro-industrial residues as sustainable sources of plant cellulose nanofibers and nanocrystals, which can be used for a multitude of nanotechnological applications. BC-based hydrogels have a nanofiber structure, allowing them to absorb, store, and desorb large amounts of water [30]. Some functional BC-based composites include BC/chitosan composite for wound dressing materials and BC/alginate for tissue engineering [31,32]. BC’s dietary fiber properties are utilized to produce nata-de-coco, a juicy and chewy dessert from the Philippines [18].

2.1.2. Alginate

Alginate is an anionic polysaccharide known for its hydrophilic properties. It can be extracted from marine plants (comprising up to 40% of dry weight) and, to a lesser extent, from bacteria. Large-scale production comes from brown algae species, including Laminaria hyperborea, Ascophyllum nodosum, and Macrocystis pyrifera, while small-scale production involves bacterial species such as Azotobacter vinelandii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [33]. Structurally, it contains linear blocks of (1,4)-linked β-D-mannuronic acid (M) and α-L-guluronic acid (G) monomers (Figure 3) arranged in different block segments: homopolymeric blocks of G or M residues or heteropolymeric blocks of alternating MG residues. Its high reactivity is due to its numerous reactive sites, namely, two unstable bonds (1,4 O-glycosidic and internal glycolic bonds) and carboxylic acid and hydroxyl functional groups [34].
Alginate exhibits key biological properties such as non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability that make it an ideal material for producing hydrogels, injectable gels, microspheres, porous scaffolds, films, and fibers. These materials have diverse applications in various fields, like regeneration medicine (for the repair and regeneration of various tissues and organs such as skin, cartilage, and bone), nutrition supplements, semi-permeable separation, and biodegradable packaging [35].

2.1.3. Chitin

Chitin is a polysaccharide generally obtained from the exoskeleton of crustaceans and other chitin-containing sources like cephalopods, protozoans, coelenterates, and seaweed. [36]. As reported by Gadgey et al. [37], chitin biopolymer is a high molecular weight (120 kDa), amorphous solid that has a density ranging from 0.18 to 0.33 g/cm3, high to low viscosity, and solubility in dilute acidic solvents but remains insoluble in water, alkali, and organic solvents. Chemically (Figure 4), chitin biopolymers have linear polyamine and reactive amino groups that exhibit affinity toward negatively charged surfaces. Its degree of acetylation ranges from 70–90% and has a high charge density at pH < 6.5 [37]. Chitin exhibits three polymorphs, namely α, β, and γ, based on the chain orientations. The α-chitin has been reported to be most abundant in shellfish shells and the most stable among the three. However, β- and γ- chitin possess the ability to transform into α-chitin under favorable conditions [38].
Studies have found chitin biopolymers to possess excellent biological properties, including non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and antioxidant, anticarcinogen, and antitumor properties upon application [38,39]. However, its highly insoluble nature translates to poor biodegradability properties hence requiring further processing or the use of functional additives [38].

2.1.4. Chitosan

Chitosan, a chitin-derived polysaccharide, is composed of linear β-(1-4)-2-amino-2-deoxy-d-glucopyranose repeating units. It is considered a copolymer of N-acetylglucosamine and N-glucosamine units randomly or block-distributed throughout the biopolymer chain (Figure 5) [6,40]. The polymer chain contains amino functional groups in the deacetylated units at C-2 and hydroxyl groups at C-3 and C-6 positions, which confer chitosan with excellent reactivity and versatility [5,6].
The physiochemical and biological properties of chitosan depend on the initial source and composition of the chitin, as well as the processing method [41], but in general, it possesses excellent biological properties such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, and antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory activity [40,41]. Chitosan is a crucial material across various sectors, especially in the biomedical field. Its cationic character, arising from the presence of amino groups, affords it with key properties essential for drug delivery applications such as controlled drug release, mucoadhesion, in situ gelation, transfection, permeation enhancement, and efflux pump inhibitory [37].

2.1.5. Gellan Gum

Gellan gum (GG) is a tetrasaccharide natural biopolymer with a linear structure of repeating units of two subunits of β-D-glucose and one subunit each of β-D-glucuronate and α-L-rhamnose (Figure 6) [42].
The bacterium Sphingomonas paucimobilis secretes GG, which is then extracted from the post-culture fluid for commercial purposes. Its versatility allows for tailoring physicochemical properties to suit a wide range of industrial applications [43]. It has exceptional biocompatibility and biodegradability characteristics, making it a common additive in biomedical products for enhanced compatibility and minimizing adverse reactions [44]. Furthermore, the presence of hydroxyl groups in the polymer chains allows it to form salt complexes, rendering it a unique material for electrolytes in batteries, solar cells, and other electrochemical applications. GG’s ability to form a three-dimensional crosslinked hydrogel under optimized process conditions makes it ideal for a wide range of biomedical and pharmaceutical applications, as hydrogels facilitate the controlled release of therapeutic compounds in drug delivery [45,46,47].

2.1.6. Starch

Starch is the most abundant storage polysaccharide in plants, and is primarily sourced from corn, wheat, potatoes, and rice. Chemically, starch is a homopolymer composed of repeated glucose units (Figure 7). It exists in two forms: amylose and amylopectin [48]. Amylose is a linear polysaccharide composed of 500–2000 glucose units linked by α-1-4 glycosidic bonds and constitutes 20–30% of starch. Amylopectin is a branched polysaccharide with chain lengths of 1,000,000 glucose units linked by α-1-6 glycosidic bonds, making up 70–80% of starch [49].
Starch exhibits unusual physicochemical properties that limit its industrial applications, such as insolubility in cold water and viscosity fluctuation during thermal processing. However, its other properties, such as low cost, low density, large surface area, and porosity, make starch attractive for novel bioproduct development. The biological aspects, including renewability, biocompatibility, degradability, and non-toxicity, make it invaluable for biological applications in the medical and pharmaceutical fields [50]. Nanocomposites (starch/hydroxyapatite), hydrogels, foams, films, and aerogels can be synthesized from starch, with applications in ophthalmic drug delivery, infectious disease treatment, regenerative medicine, and tissue engineering [48].

2.1.7. Dextran

Dextran, a natural exopolysaccharide secreted by lactic acid bacteria, has a long chain of D-glucose molecules connected by α-(1→6) bonds, but may also have branching points where D-glucose molecules are linked by α-(1→4), α-(1→3), or α-(1→2) bonds (Figure 8). Its molecular weight can vary widely, ranging from around 1 up to 2300 kDa [51,52,53].
Dextran has unique solubility, viscosity, and thermal and rheological characteristics that make it a valuable resource in various industries, including food, pharmaceuticals, and biotechnology research. For example, Kavlak et al. [54] prepared a dextran–polymethacrylamide (PMAM) blend using a solution casting method and explored the dynamic mechanical properties and thermal transitions of biocompatible dextran (T10 and T40) as a viable material for biomedical applications [54].

2.1.8. Pullulan

Pullulan is a highly soluble, tasteless, odorless, edible, and biodegradable fungal exopolysaccharide produced by Aureobasidium spp. under aerobic conditions and a carbon-rich substrate [55,56,57]. Its numerous advantages, including heat resistance, non-carcinogenicity, non-toxicity, non-immunogenicity, and wide viscosity range give it significant relevance in the industrial setting. Its structure constitutes maltotriose units connected by α-1,4 and α-1,6 glycosidic bonds in an unbranched sequence (Figure 9) [58].
Pullulan has a relatively lower viscosity compared to other polysaccharides, with a molecular weight of 40–600 kDa and a melting point range of 250–300 °C [57,59]. It is used to fabricate a wide range of biomaterials for applications, including cholesterol-bearing nanogels for wound healing [60,61], hydrogels for vascular cell engineering [62], gels for skin tissue regeneration [61], hard capsules for in vitro drug delivery [63], or pullulan–dextran microbeads for bone repair [55].

2.1.9. Agarose

Agarose is a natural polysaccharide obtained from marine sources, usually red algae, comprised of alternating units of β-D-galactopyranosyl and 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactopyranosyl [64]. It is considered a thermally gelling alternating copolymer of β-1,3-linked D-galactose and α-1,4-linked 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactose fragments (Figure 10).
Agarose has a unique temperature-sensitive property, allowing its transition from a water-insoluble gel-like state to a water-soluble state. This makes it an ideal material for cell encapsulation, as proven by Nilsson [65], who successfully immobilized and entrapped suspension-grown cells within polymer microbeads, paving the way for new possibilities in cell culture and research with agarose [65]. Consequently, advanced research has been conducted, among which Karoubi et al. [66] made a significant breakthrough by developing a single-cell agarose hydrogel microcapsule. Their findings revealed that agarose microcapsules can efficiently support the survival of transplanted cells, achieved by striking a balance between mass transfer and metabolic requirements, demonstrating the great potential of agarose as a cell-delivery system [66].

2.2. Protein-Based Materials

2.2.1. Collagen

Collagen is a widely distributed class of protein that originates from a wide range of animals, including mammals and chordate classes. It can be sourced from animal skin (pigs, cattle, sheep), waste leather material, Achilles tendons, rat-tail tendons, fish skin, or through a recombinant protein production system. This fibrous protein is the major constituent of skin and bone, accounting for roughly 25% of the total dry weight in mammals [67]. Collagen’s structure is composed of three protein chains (alpha (α) chains) that form a distinctive triple helix structure. Each α chain contains approximately 1000 amino acids and has a molecular weight of about 100 kDa, based on the repeating sequence of specific amino acids Gly-Xaa-Yaa (Figure 11). Gly is the smallest amino acid, with a hydrogen atom as its side chain, allowing it to fit at the center of the triple helix without causing steric hindrance while the Xaa and Yaa positions are predominantly filled by proline and 4-hydroxyproline [68].
Collagen’s stability, plasticity, and viscosity are temperature-dependent, with a degradation temperature ranging from 5 to 50 °C. Its ability to bind ligands such as integrins and low-density lipoproteins helps in cell signal transmission. Moreover, it possesses biological properties that include low toxicity, low antigenicity, easy absorption by the body, biocompatibility, and biodegradability, which contribute to its wide applications in medicine, pharmacology, and implantology [68,69]. Collagen has found several applications in tissue engineering including Type I collagen widely used in bone repair, Type II in cartilage regeneration, and Type I, III, and VI in skin tissue regeneration as a naturally occurring matrix or composites with improved strength. Its biological activity is maintained upon application in forms such as hydrogel, freeze-dried sponges, collagen membranes or films, creams, injectable preparations, coatings, and scaffolds [70].

2.2.2. Gelatin

Gelatin is a biopolymer of animal origin, primarily obtained from animal bones, cartilage, ligaments, and skin. It is often referred to as hydrolyzed collagen, as it is obtained through the incomplete hydrolysis of collagen [71]. During the hydrolysis process, collagen undergoes structural breakdown to yield a mixture of peptides of varying molecular weights (Figure 12) [72].
The physicochemical properties of gelatin are largely dependent on its sources; gelatin from mammals exhibits superior properties compared to fish gelatin, which in turn outperforms insect-derived gelatin [72]. In general, gelatin is soluble in warm water, forms a gel upon cooling, and melts at normal body temperature, with its viscosity dependent on concentration and temperature. It is biocompatible, biodegradable, and non-toxic, which determines its wide range of practical applications [73]. Among others, gelatin is one of the widely used ingredients in food and non-food industries for improving thickening, stabilization, gelation, and emulsification purposes [71]. Gelatin-based hydrogels have wide applications in the biomedical sector, including drug delivery, tissue engineering, tissue adhesives, wound dressings, and wearable devices [74]. These can likewise be utilized in environmental applications such as contaminant removal during wastewater treatment [75,76].

2.2.3. Silk

Silk is classified as a naturally occurring protein-based polymer usually extracted from spiders and the silkworm Bombyx mori. Silk has gained significant interest because of its ease of handling, biocompatibility, and environmentally friendly character [77]. Structurally (Figure 13), silk polymer is made of two main proteins: silk fibroin—the core structural protein—and sericin, a glue-like globular protein coating the fibroin [77,78].
Silkworm silk is semi-crystalline (62–65% crystallinity) and demonstrates thermal stability at temperatures below 100 °C. Its excellent mechanical properties, biocompatibility, biodegradability, and good versatility in terms of structural adjustment make it a suitable biomaterial [79]. For instance, silk is used in tissue engineering and as a matrix for wound healing as well as in the fight against cystitis, edema, impotence, epididymitis, and cancer [78]. Moreover, their anti-inflammatory and anti-tumfacient properties make them suitable for treating acute sinusitis and tonsillectomy. Silk-based hydrogels have also been intensively examined as drug-delivery systems [77].

2.2.4. Fibrin

Fibrin is a protein-based biopolymer obtained from fibrinogen through a cascade of enzymatic reactions activated by thrombin [80]. Fibrinogen, a major component of the blood, is a long glycoprotein with a molecular weight of about 340 kDa. It is composed of a dimer formed by three disulfide-linked polypeptide chains, namely Aα, Bβ, and γ, having molecular weights of 66.5 kDa, 52 kDa, and 46.5 kDa, respectively [81]. Fibrinogen’s structure comprises two globular D regions and one central E region, each containing portions of α-helical coiled coils (Figure 14).
Fibrin polymers have excellent mechanical strength, good elasticity, and mesh-like structures and are considered biodegradable and biocompatible [82,83]. These characteristics make them ideal for a range of applications, particularly in the biomedical industry. Some products from fibrin include glues, scaffolds, hydrogels, gels, microbeads, composites, and sealants, each with specific usage in the biomedical field [84].

2.2.5. Elastin

Elastin is an elastomeric, insoluble, and fibrous protein that forms the internal core of elastic fiber, constituting the extracellular matrix, and is mainly present in organs and tissues such as skin, ligaments, bladder, blood vessels, cartilage, and lungs [85,86]. It is synthesized during elastogenesis from tropoelastin [85], a protein precursor secreted by elastogenic cells (e.g., endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts), and has a molecular weight of about 60 kDa [87]. Structurally (Figure 15), elastin in the form of elastic fibers is composed of two parts: an inner core of amorphous crosslinked elastin, which constitutes about 90%, and an outer microfibrillar mantle [86].
Elastin biopolymers are hydrophobic and insoluble and thereby can resist acid and alkali degradation. It exhibits rubbery properties in the presence of water, with a low elastic modulus [87]. Elastin is considered a biodegradable, biocompatible, and low immunogenicity biopolymer with excellent elasticity, resilience, durability, and longevity [88,89]. Due to its excellent physicochemical and biological properties, elastin has found applications in various sectors. Among others, it is used in the fabrication of elastin-like polypeptides used as scaffolds for tissue engineering [90] and hydrogel-based drug delivery systems [86].

2.2.6. Soy Protein

Soy protein is obtained from soybeans processed in the edible oil industry and is regarded as a by-product of the edible oil extraction process [91,92]. There are three main types of soy protein products, categorized by their varying concentrations (ranging from 50% to 90%) and commercially available as soy flour, soy protein concentrate, and soy protein isolate (SPI), each with distinct differences in protein content [93]. Soy protein is a blend of albumins and globulins, with the majority (90%) being storage proteins, mainly consisting of 7S (β-conglycinin) and 11S (glycinin) globulins [94]. The molecular weights and isoelectronic point values of the 11S and 7S differ significantly, with values of 360 kDa and 6.4 and 175 kDa and 4.8, respectively [95]. Soy protein is a relatively stable globular protein and contains a variety of functional groups such as -NH2, -OH, -SH, and -COOH, which facilitate convenient modification (chemical or physical) and combination with other biopolymers to produce materials of higher value. Soy protein has many useful applications in sectors including food packaging or edible films as it complies with food-grade standards and has a long storage life [93,96]. It is likewise commonly used in the production of hydrogels, adhesives, plastics, films, coatings, and emulsifiers, and is considered a material with high potential for biotechnological and biomedical applications [97].

2.2.7. Whey Protein

Whey accounts for 20% of the total protein in milk and is essentially the translucent, fluid byproduct of the cheese-making process [98]. Whey proteins are further separated from whey and purified through various techniques, resulting in different concentrations of whey proteins. It comes in three primary products, varying in protein content: whey powder (11–14.5% protein), whey concentrates (25–89% protein), and whey isolate (>90% protein) [98]. WP is composed primarily of β-Lactoglobulin (β-La) (50–60%), a small globular protein with 162 amino acids and a molecular weight of approximately 18.3 kDa [99]. It also contains α-Lactalbumin (α-La; 14.2 kDa) at 20–25% [100], 1.2–1.5% of bovine serum albumin (BSA; 66.5 kDa), and <10% of lactoferrin (78–80 kDa) [101,102]. A strong hydrogen interaction between calcium ions and α-La results in a stable molecular structure, enhanced binding capacity, heat stability, and non-gelling characteristics.
Whey and whey protein hold significant potential, with Smithers [103] using the phrase “gutter to gold” to describe the transformation of whey into its derivatives. Extensive research conducted to fully ascertain the enormous advantages of whey protein revealed its versatility and applicability in a variety of fields, including pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, food and beverages, and therapeutic applications [104]. Researchers are currently exploring the sustainable valorization of whey, including conversion into bioethanol and other value-added products through fermentation. For instance, recent reviews highlight the advances in cheese whey biotransformation into bioplastics and natural colors and flavors as well as bioethanol production using engineered yeast and co-cultures, obtaining high bioethanol yields at optimal conditions [105].

2.2.8. Resilin

Resilin, obtained from a wide range of arthropods, is an endogenous extracellular matrix protein composed primarily of amino acids with a high proportion of acidic residues and a low proportion of nonpolar residues. This composition results in a low isoelectric point and a strong hydrophilic nature [106]. It is the most efficient known elastic protein as it works practically as a perfect isotropic rubber, exhibiting long-range reversible elasticity and exceptional resilience [106,107]. Hydration transforms resilin into a hydrogel (at 50–60% water content and neutral pH) with significantly altered physical properties. This transformation enables resilin to switch between two distinct states: a flexible, rubber-like material when hydrated but otherwise a rigid, glassy polymer [108]. Much research has been conducted on resilin for various applications, including effective energy storage and biomedical purposes, especially tissue engineering, due to its reversible elasticity, high-frequency responsiveness, hydrophilic capacity, self-assembly behavior, and fluorescent properties. Lihui and Wen [109] found that human mesenchymal stem cells formed more extensive stress fibers on resilin-based hydrogels with RGD sequences, enhancing cell attachment and expansion [109]. On the other hand, resilin-based material (RZ10) developed by Renner et al. [110] displayed an unconstrained compressive modulus comparable to that of human cartilage, making it suitable for tissue engineering applications [110]. Truong et al. [111] also created a pH-responsive biosensor surface by attaching a resilin-mimetic protein to gold nanoparticles in a compact state. This innovative design leveraged the protein’s fluorescence capabilities and nanoparticle stabilizing properties, enabling precise control over nanoparticle growth rates [111].

2.3. Other Natural-Based Materials

2.3.1. Polyisoprene

Polyisoprene is a polymer consisting of chains of isoprene monomers, primarily of cis-1,4-polyisoprene (Figure 16).
It is a natural rubber obtained from the sap of Hevea brasiliensis (rubber tree). This material is known for its excellent elasticity and resilience, making it an attractive material for different applications, particularly in tire manufacturing, footwear, and various latex products [112].

2.3.2. Plant Oils

Plant oils are increasingly gaining attention in the field of sustainable biomaterials due to their versatility in application, particularly those derived from vegetable sources like soybean, olive, palm, and sunflower. They can be valorized into several polymeric biomaterials with biodegradable and biocompatible properties well-suited for applications in the biomedical sector such as drug delivery, tissue engineering, and scaffolding for cell growth. Valorization includes functionalizing these oils to enhance their properties through acylation, transesterification, metathesis, and epoxidation reactions. These processes transform the triglycerides into polymerizable monomers, allowing for the formulation of materials with specific mechanical and chemical characteristics tailored for biomedical applications [113].

2.3.3. Rosin

Rosin, a solid form of resin, is an amber-colored, transparent, glass-shaped natural biodegradable polymer obtained from pine trees and other plants. It primarily consists of resin acids, especially abietic acid (Figure 17) [114].
It has a variety of applications, including as a glazing agent in medicines and chewing gum, as well as in paper-making chemicals, paints, adhesives, and as a flux in soldering. Rosin acids readily crystallize, leading to issues like increased viscosity and reduced storage life; hence, in practical applications, carboxylic acids and their salts can be used as crystallization inhibitors for rosin-based materials [115].

2.3.4. Hyaluronic Acid

Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural biopolymer made up of repeating disaccharide units formed by D-glucuronic acid and N-acetylglucosamine molecules connected through β-(1-4) and β-(1-3) glycosidic bonds (Figure 18).
HA, a part of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) family, is classified as a mucopolysaccharide. Its remarkable ability to retain large quantities of water makes it a key ingredient in aesthetic medicine, boosting tissue hydration and resistance to mechanical stress. It is biocompatible, biodegradable, and has broad availability. As such, it has been widely utilized across various medical fields, such as oncology, orthopedics, ophthalmology, and aesthetic dermatology [116].

2.4. Specific Types of the Functional Forms of Natural Polymer-Based Materials

Natural polymers are engineered into diverse biomaterials and biocomposites with unique properties that allow their inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, renewability, and versatility to be harnessed for various beneficial applications. These biomaterials are tailored into functional forms, including nanofibers, nanotubes, hydrogels, aerogels, nanoparticles, films, membranes, and 3D porous scaffolds to address global challenges across various sectors. For instance, cellulose-based films are increasingly being developed to replace single-use plastics for sustainable packaging applications [117]. This subsection explores some specific natural polymer-based biomaterials, their unique properties, and fabrication methods.

2.4.1. Nanofibers

Nanofibers derived from bio-based materials are classified as natural or are chemically synthesized, with the former encompassing starch, cellulose, alginate, and chitin, while the latter includes polylactic acid [118]. As the name implies, these fibers are smaller in size, typically having a diameter less than 100 nm, and exhibit excellent surface area-to-volume ratio, mechanical strength, and tunable porosity [119]. Several studies have reported the successful synthesis of nanofibers using various techniques, such as fibrillation [120], melt spinning [121], 3D printing [122], electrospinning [123], microfluidic spinning [124], etc. This class of materials has emerged as a sustainable and versatile bio-based material with a wide range of applications in the packaging industry, biomedical sector, and environmental remediation. For instance, nanofibers have been extensively used as reinforcing materials in the synthesis of bio-based films for packaging materials. The incorporation of nanofibers (e.g., cellulose nanofibers) into biopolymers has been shown to enhance their physicochemical properties, broadening their areas of application [125]. Biopolymer–nanofiber scaffolds have also exhibited excellent performance in cell attachment and proliferation. Recent innovations include the development of bio-ink by incorporating nanofibers into natural pigments for applications such as 3D printing [126].

2.4.2. Nanotubes

The search for renewable materials has driven the development of bio-based nanotubes. This category of nanotubes, including carbon nanotubes (CNTs) derived from biomass, peptide nanotubes, organosilicon polymer nanotubes, cellulose-based nanotubes, chitosan nanotubes, and virus-based protein nanotubes, presents a promising alternative to petroleum-based options [127]. Known for their large surface area, elasticity, high tensile strength, excellent electrical conductivity, and chemical stability, coupled with their biocompatibility and biodegradability, bio-based nanotubes are used in various applications, including biomedicine, sustainable coating, water treatment, and biosensor development. In biomedicine, for instance, Li et al. [128] synthesized a novel siRNA-induced peptide co-assembly nanocarrier as a peptide-based nanocarrier for cancer therapy which exhibited excellent gene silencing efficiency and high biocompatibility both in vitro and in vivo [128]. In sustainable coating, CNTs were incorporated into an epoxidized soybean oil (ESO)-based vitrimer to synthesize a superhydrophobic coating. The coating exhibits excellent self-healing and recyclability properties, giving it excellent anti/deicing and photothermal deicing performance [129]. This highlighted the potential solution for anti-icing and de-icing applications.

2.4.3. Hydrogels

Natural hydrogels are three-dimensional, crosslinked polymeric materials synthesized from biopolymers such as chitosan, starch, alginate, lignin, and gelatin [130]. The hydrogels are identified by their unique feature, which is their ability to absorb and retain a large quantity of water without dissolving. Hydrogels can be classified based on the method of crosslinking. Physically crosslinked hydrogels involve non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding, ionic interactions, and hydrophobic interactions, offering high water content and reversible structure [131]. Chemically crosslinked hydrogels involve covalent bonds between the polymeric chains, providing improved mechanical strength and long-term stability [132]. Natural polymer-based hydrogels have recently gained attention for their biocompatibility, biodegradability, and tunable properties, leading to diverse applications including drug delivery systems, wound dressing, food packaging, water/wastewater treatment, personal care, agriculture, biosensors, etc. Research has proven that the hydrogels synthesized from natural sources exhibit satisfactory results. For instance, Ramirez Martines [133] utilized keratin and polysaccharides such as agar-agar and carboxymethylcellulose to synthesize physically crosslinked hydrogels for use as a lubricating, low-friction coating on endotracheal tubes in biomedical coating and wound healing applications. This hydrogel demonstrated superabsorbent behavior with swelling rates up to 36-fold and exhibited high biocompatibility and low friction coefficients, indicating its potential to reduce tissue damage [133]. In agriculture, biopolymeric superabsorbent hydrogels evaluated in India (i.e., Pusa Hydrogel and its kaolin derivative) based on semi-synthetic cellulose derivatives show promising outcomes. The Pusa Hydrogel applied under various irrigation regimes significantly increased soil moisture retention and soybean and wheat yields (up to 52.7% increase under rainfed conditions), demonstrating the hydrogel’s efficacy in soil amendment [134]. Natural polymer-based hydrogels have found importance in water treatment as a powerful tool for improving the engineering potential of enzymes through immobilization for contaminant degradation. Researchers at the University of Texas Austin are exploring innovative molecularly functionalized biomass hydrogels from diverse natural materials for application in water treatment. Field tests of the hydrogel systems demonstrated the ability to harvest up to 14.19 L of clean water per kilogram of sorbent daily, outperforming conventional materials. This holds great promise as a material to absorb water for effective contaminant degradation [135].

2.4.4. Aerogels

Focusing on bio-based aerogels, these are primarily made from proteins and polysaccharides extracted from biomass through the sol–gel synthesis process, which is followed by solvent exchange and drying [136]. This method allows the formation of a highly porous 3D network and enables the control of some properties such as porosity, mechanical strength, and surface area. Since bio-based aerogels still have some limitations and thus cannot exhibit all the properties of their inorganic counterparts, research has currently focused on the development of hybrid aerogels that are functionally tailored to meet their applications in different fields [137]. In this modification, the addition of inorganics helps to improve their chemistry and their unique features.
However, among all the stages involved during aerogel synthesis, the drying stage has the highest influence on the properties of the aerogels. These drying methods include supercritical CO2 drying, which involves heating the wet gel at a temperature and pressure above the critical temperature and pressure of the liquid stored inside the gel’s pores and offers structural integrity and high porosity. Freeze drying refers to the sublimation of the solid, usually in the frozen state, which is economically cheap but has a lower surface area, and atmospheric pressure drying, which is industrially applicable but causes shrinkage or the formation of a solid film without porosity [136].
As a result of these critical features, aerogels are applicable in various fields, including tissue engineering, as a microporous scaffold [136]; in biomedicine, as drug delivery carriers (e.g., starch-based nanoporous aerogels for ketoprofen distribution) [138]; and in energy storage systems, as a material with increased surface area and improved conductivity due to nitrogen doping that enhances electrode performance [139]. Such a matrix was synthesized in the form of an N-doped porous carbon nanofiber aerogel from marine biomass waste through cellulose nanofiber pyrolysis in NH3 and KOH activation.

2.4.5. Films/Membranes

The environmental implications of films and membranes fabricated from natural polymeric materials are substantial, offering a dual benefit of reduced reliance on fossil fuels while also addressing environmental issues related to their non-biodegradable counterparts. Natural biopolymers such as cellulose, lignin, chitosan, alginate, and starch exhibit unique mechanical, barrier, and biocompatible properties suiting a wide range of applications. Chemical modification, crosslinking, additive incorporation, and utilizing biopolymer blends can enhance film and membrane properties [140,141]. Common methods for film and membrane fabrication include solvent casting/evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) [141,142], doctor blade casting [142], vacuum-assisted filtration [143], phase separation methods [144], and electrospinning [145,146].
The versatilities of films and membranes are demonstrated by recent innovations presented in numerous studies. For example, the biocompatible and flexible glycine/alginate/glycerol film sensor sealed with polylactic acid and beeswax demonstrated high piezoelectric sensitivity and stability in both in vitro and in vivo settings, positioning it as a promising alternative to rigid piezoelectric materials in biomedical sensing [141]. In food packaging, Hashemi et al. [147] introduced essential oil nanoemulsions and carbon dots into gelatin–chitosan films, resulting in improved antioxidant and antimicrobial activities [147]. Advancements in membrane technologies are also notable. Hastuti et al. [148] improved the pervaporation performance of alginate membranes in terms of flux capacity, selectivity, and mechanical strength by leveraging the strong hydrophilic characteristics of cellulose nanofibers [148]. In renewable energy, de Haro et al. [149] utilized lignin-based membranes as quasi-solid-state electrolytes in aqueous dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) for enhanced photostability and device lifetime by taking advantage of lignin’s UV-protective properties [149].

2.4.6. Three-Dimensional Porous Scaffolds

The inherent biocompatibility, biodegradability, and, most importantly, structural similarity to the extracellular matrix (ECM) make biopolymers invaluable for the fabrication of 3D porous scaffolds. Commonly used biopolymers, e.g., collagen, gelatin, chitosan, silk fibroin, alginate, and cellulose derivatives, have demonstrated effectiveness in developing biomimetic structures that support essential cellular functions (i.e., attachment, proliferation, and differentiation) [150,151]. These scaffolds play a vital role in advancing the biomedical sector, as they can be tailored to meet the specific requirements of various therapeutic applications.
Fabrication techniques have a strong influence on the physical and biological performance of scaffolds by dictating pore structure, fiber alignment, and scaffold geometry. Common methods include lyophilization, solvent casting/particulate leaching (SCPL), phase separation, gas foaming, electrospinning, and additive manufacturing [150,152]. For instance, electrospinning produces micro- and nanofibrous scaffolds with close ECM resemblance by controlling fiber diameter and alignment, factors crucial for tissue engineering applications such as skin regeneration [153]. On the other hand, 3D printing can allow the use of thermosensitive hydrogels to fabricate scaffolds with geometries that enhance cell adhesion and differentiation [154]. Using the SCPL technique, it is possible to produce a porous chitosan–bacterial cellulose scaffold structure favoring osteoblast adhesion and differentiation [150]. Additional modifications, like sonication and crosslinking (physical or chemical), can enhance the mechanical strength and functional stability of scaffolds [155,156]. An alginate/chitosan scaffold with gold nanoparticles fabricated by Beltran-Vargas et al. [157] has the potential to be a novel implant material for cardiac tissue engineering as it favored cardiomyocyte growth and spheroid formations, while the gold additive increased cell proliferation and promoted the production of cardiac proteins [157]. Other scaffolds useful for tissue engineering include collagen/phenolic acids-based scaffolds [158], chitosan/gelatin/poly(caprolactone)/poly(lactic acid) scaffolds [154], zein/gum arabic/marigold extract/poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds [153], borax crosslinked chitosan/guar gum/graphene oxide scaffolds, and others [156].

2.5. Functional Additives in Natural Polymer-Based Biomaterials

Natural polymer-based biomaterials are often strategically incorporated with functional additives to enhance performance or improve their mechanical, chemical, and biological properties, enabling precise tailoring for multidisciplinary applications. These additives, ranging from crosslinkers to colorants (Table 1), serve as precision tools to obtain optimal performance outcomes. For instance, crosslinkers such as glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin, genipin, ionic salts, and others are used in hydrogel synthesis to obtain structural stability and integrity, particularly for load-bearing applications like tissue scaffolds [159]. Therapeutic bioactive molecules such as antimicrobial peptides and growth factors are incorporated to impart biomaterials with active functionalities, as applied in infection control in wound dressing [160] and natural hydrogel systems designed for the controlled release of angiogenic factors to promote vascularization [161]. In some cases, bio-derived additives may be introduced into non-bio-based materials to promote biodegradability and reactivity, aligning material properties with circular economy principles. By combining biomaterials with functional ingredients, researchers have achieved tunable degradation rates and stimuli-responsive behavior and enhanced compatibility with industrial processing methods.

3. Innovations in the Application of Natural-Originated Polymeric Biomaterials

Natural-based materials have emerged as a revolutionary and sustainable type of material, driving significant advancements in medicine, the food industry, agriculture, biotechnology, and other sectors (Figure 19). The development of these biomaterials is gaining attention as a promising alternative to traditional synthetic materials, leveraging the inherent advantages of biomaterials, including adaptability, compatibility with living tissues, degradability, abundance, and cost-effectiveness.
There are several ongoing studies on the innovative use of these materials. These are emerging innovations in well-developing sectors, where the literature suggests that development rates are influenced by global trends, technological advancements, and shifting demand patterns. The environmental sector appears to be advancing quickly due to the global quest for sustainable practices, environmental regulations, and the urgent need for wastewater treatment, bioremediation, and climate change mitigation. Recent advances in biomaterials are also driving innovation in medicine, revolutionizing wound care, diagnostics, and treatment options. Table 2 offers an insight into the latest innovations in the practical development of natural-based biomaterials.

3.1. Energy Sector

The fabrication of lignin-derived honeycomb-like porous carbon/SiO2 composites for high-performance Li-ion batteries: Carbon materials play an essential role in energy systems and energy storage materials because they possess excellent properties including chemical stability, good electrical conductivity, high thermal stability, and large surface area. Among the various carbon materials, three-dimensional (3D) porous carbon materials are largely regarded as most suitable for use in the fabrication of energy storage devices like sodium-ion batteries, lithium-ion batteries, and super-capacitors due to their improved interconnected porous structure and excellent structural stability [202].
A study on the electrochemical performance of a lignin-derived honeycomb-like porous carbon/SiO2 composite (LHC/SiO2-21) with a 3D structure in a Li-ion battery highlighted the potential of biomaterials in energy storage devices [181]. The LHC/SiO2-21 synthesis involved a dual-template-assisted self-assembly strategy. With this method, the self-assembly of cationic quaternized alkali lignin (QAL) and anionic surfactant sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate (SDBS) was performed in an ethanol/water solvent to form a QAL/SDBS colloidal sphere, which was subsequently combined with negatively charged SiO2 and taken through ultrasonic dispersion in an ethanol/water solvent, free-drying, carbonization, and alkali etching. The electrochemical performance test of the LHC/SiO2-21 electrode showed a specific delivered discharge and charge capacities of 2942.5 and 1070.1 mAh/g, respectively, at a constant current of a density of 0.1 A/g, with an initial coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 36.4% for the first cycle. The electrode reaches an ICE of over 98% after the 20 cycles, highlighting the electrode’s structural stability and reaction reversibility. The synthesized material was found to be suitable for use as an anode in Li-ion batteries, with a good reversible capacity of 1109 mAh/g, and a long cycle performance [181].

3.2. Medical Sector

The integration of collagen, fibrin, and glycoproteins into the development of organs-on-chips (OoCs) for drug testing, screening, disease modeling, and personalized medicine: Drug discovery is one of the most important aspects of the pharmaceutical industry. However, there are some shortcomings in the drug evaluation stage, including animal welfare protections, hence organ-on-a-chip technology, with the ability to simulate human organ systems, enables the drug evaluation process that includes testing for its toxicity, activity, safety, metabolism, and pharmacological efficacy; drug PK/PD modeling, disease modeling; and personalized medicine. These OoCs can be single or multiple organs on a chip and this may include lung, heart, liver, kidney, gut, bone marrow, skin, and muscles [203]. Collagen, fibrin, and glycoproteins are important in enhancing the OoC platforms. They mainly contribute to the structural and functional mimicry of the extracellular matrix (ECM), enabling cell growth, differentiation, and interaction with the microfluidic environment of OoCs. Microfluidic technology is used in the development of the OoCs where the organ-specific cells are cultured in a flask or disk with properly engineered systems that replicate the physiological conditions. Due to the transparency and biocompatibility of materials such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), they are employed for chip fabrication. Biomaterials such as collagen and glycoproteins are used in 3D natural cell scaffolds to provide in vivo-like microenvironments, supporting cell attachment and morphogenesis. Fibrin simulates the extracellular matrix interactions (ECM) and glycoproteins facilitate cell–ECM communication and biochemical signaling. While OoCs have significantly advanced in the research phase, their successful conversion into commercial products is still limited. This is due to some challenges such as difficulty in the controlled application of nutrient supply and limited multiscale structures and tissue interfaces that are important for organ function. The integrated development of OoCs with artificial intelligence shows a positive change in the pharmaceutical industry including the development of OoC hardware. AI will promote convenient OoC data processing and increase the detection throughput of OoCs [204].
Oxidized sodium alginate/gelatin/halloysite hydrogel used as an injectable, adhesive, and antibacterial dressing for hemostasis: Wound care faces problems like hemorrhages and infections that may cause shock and disability and sometimes lead to death. Healing requires four main stages: (1) the hemostasis stage, being the most effective step to reduce the death rate; (2) the inflammation stage; (3) the proliferation stage; and (4) the wound structure remodeling stage. Thus, wound dressing with hemostatic and antibacterial properties is of great importance, but this is limited in conventional dressing due to insufficient mechanical strength, antibacterial efficacy, and biocompatibility. Hydrogels are polymers with 3D structures that have been applied in wound dressing due to their strong network formed because of physical or chemical crosslinked chains. Lin et al. [189] researched an oxidized sodium alginate/gelatin/halloysite hydrogel (OSA/Gel/HNTs) that has been applied for wound healing. This combines OSA and gelatin as the primary matrix combined with halloysite nanotubes. This hydrogel forms a self-crossed network through Schiff base reactions ensuring excellent mechanical properties, injectability, and skin adhesion. HNTs facilitate crosslinking, reducing the gelation time and providing antibacterial activity against some pathogens like E. coli and S. aureus. This hydrogel has been proven to also reduce clotting time, minimize bleeding, and demonstrate effective hemostatic and antibacterial properties for advanced wound dressing.
The formulation of drug-free coating functionalized with tailored collagen supports for vascular tissue healing: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is among the top cardiovascular diseases and affects a large population of human beings worldwide. A stent implantation is an effective treatment method for CAD that has shown a great evolution in its treatment, replacing the traditional surgical thoracotomy. However, some complications, such as arterial tissue damage, cause thrombus formation and acute inflammatory response. These processes together are interrelated and responsible for the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) and the proliferation of smooth muscles, which majorly cause hyperplasia, which is a key cause for in-stent restenosis (ISR). A drug-eluting stent (DES) offers an effective way to reduce ISR by releasing drugs to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation. Meanwhile, delayed endothelial healing, chronic inflammation, and an increased risk of late stent thrombosis limit their efficacy and safety for use. In solving these problems, a recombinant humanized type III collagen (rhCol III) has been suggested as it offers an innovative, drug-free coating for vascular tissue healing. Through structural biology and genetic engineering, tailored biomaterial collagen is integrated as a stent coating to support vascular tissue healing. rhCol III possesses some properties like anticoagulant and cell adhesion activity, giving it the ability to retain highly adhesive fragments of Gly-Glu-Arg (GER) and Gly-Glu-Lys (GEK) of rhCol III and bypass the hydroxyproline (O) sequence, which might induce platelet adhesion and activation. A stent coating with only rhCol III coating (drug-free) possesses several effects on cardiovascular stents including low inflammatory response, reducing the LST risk, inhibiting ISR, and promoting vascular neointimal healing. Unlike DES, rhCol III naturally fosters in situ tissue repair and addresses the limitations of delayed healing and thrombosis. Hence, the biomaterial collagen prompts a promising future strategy for cardiovascular implants [190].
Sustainable collagen alternatives from engineered yeast strains for regenerative medicine and biomedical uses: Collagen is traditionally sourced from animals, which raises concerns regarding the transmission of animal diseases (e.g., bovine spongiform encephalopathies and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease) as well as accessibility for vegan or religious consumers. ProColl is a spin-off company from Swansea University that addresses these concerns by focusing on the manufacture of humanized procollagen and collagen using engineered yeast strains for a variety of applications in the medical, cosmetic, and food industries [205]. ProColl’s main products are recombinant human procollagen Type 1 α1 and humanized Type I collagen, available as single alpha-chain or as full-chain molecules. Their procollagen has a triple helix molecular form, effectively mimicking the natural configuration of human collagen, thereby maintaining the structural and biological functionality required to retain its bioactive properties, and making it an ideal substrate for precise biomedical applications like regenerative medicine, cell therapy, and coatings for medical devices [206].
Leveraging antimicrobial compounds from berry extracts incorporated into nanocellullose films for surgical and wound care solutions: Berries are known for containing antimicrobial compounds, such as ellagitannins, that have been found to likewise be effective on human skin. These antimicrobial phenolic compounds can be sustainably sourced by utilizing the by-product of berry juicing, namely the berry press cakes, which contain the berry skin and seeds. Among the various wild berries tested, raspberry has been identified as the most suitable raw material for large-scale production due to its abundant supply. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland’s patented InnoBerry Technologies™ manufacturing method involves dry and wet fractionation technologies followed by a sustainable hydrothermal extraction method that avoids the use of harmful solvents. The berry extract product can potentially replace artificial preservatives and nano-silver compounds in cosmetic and wound-care products [184]. More notably, it has been demonstrated to be effective in eliminating pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a bacterium with a global prevalence of 14.69% [207]. This is particularly interesting due to MRSA’s antibiotic resistance characteristic, which complicates treatment and can potentially be life-threatening, especially when acquired during surgeries. The antimicrobial extract developed by VTT is available in several forms and claims that it can be used as a surgical spray, cream, transdermal patch, or wound dressing. A nanocellulose film, a highly biocompatible material, can be utilized for skin applications by saturating its surface and pores with berry extract, thereby ensuring that the antimicrobial compounds are readily available rather than being trapped within the fiber network, allowing for maximum efficacy.

3.3. Environmental Sector

Enhancing Solar Still Efficiency with Snail Shell Biomaterials for Sustainable Water Purification: This innovation, as applied in the environmental sector, explored the integration of snail shell biomaterials into solar still technology to improve freshwater production. In the design of the solar still system, snail shells were utilized as absorbers to enhance the evaporation process by capturing solar energy effectively to increase the temperature in the basin. The performance of the system was quantified as snail shell solar still system (SSSS) productivity, demonstrating a 6.8% increase in hourly productivity compared to conventional solar still systems (CSSS) as well as cumulative productivity of approximately 2.28 kg/m2. The study also evaluated the energy efficiency of the SSSS, reporting a 24.1% efficiency, which was slightly higher than that of the CSSS (23%). This underscores the potential of snail shell biomaterial for sustainable water purification by harnessing solar energy. Considering its abundance and low cost, it is an environmentally friendly alternative to synthetic materials. Nonetheless, potential challenges include preparation, durability, and maintenance, hence the need for design optimization to maximize the effectiveness of the snail shells in the solar still. Overall, the research underscores the viability of this innovative approach to enhance solar desalination processes and contribute to sustainable water management solutions [192].
Eco-Friendly Cellulose Aerogel Composites for Efficient Dye and Oil Removal from Wastewater: This innovation, as applied in the environmental sector, also explores the synthesis and usage of cellulose aerogel composites derived from pineapple leaf fibers and cotton waste to address the pressing issue of wastewater pollution caused by dyes and oils. The technology utilizes the sol–gel method in an alkali–urea solution, where cellulose fibers are dissolved in the alkali–urea solution (typically NaOH-Urea) to break down the structure, allowing the formation of a homogenous solution and subsequent formation of a gel under suitable conditions, followed by freeze-drying to create aerogels with remarkable properties, including low density (0.053–0.069 g/cm3) and high porosity (nearly 95%). The mechanical performance exhibited had between a 5 and 9 times higher Young’s modulus compared to previous aerogel composites, underscoring the feasibility of using agricultural waste to produce effective water treatment materials and the potential of these cellulose aerogel composites to contribute to sustainable environmental solutions [193].
Innovative strategies in PHA production by utilizing greenhouse gases for sustainable bioplastics: Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) are biopolymers that serve as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuel-based plastics, as these have comparable plastic properties like high elasticity, tensile strength, and air resistance, with the added advantages of biocompatibility and biodegradability. PHAs serve as microorganisms’ energy and carbon storage and are produced via fermentation of sugars and fatty acids from waste feedstocks. Despite their advantages, PHA production is greatly hindered by the high production cost, with carbon sources accounting for 35–40% of the total cost [191]. Utilizing greenhouse gases (GHGs) like methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) as carbon sources offers several benefits of carbon sequestration, promotes a bio-based circular economy, and reduces costs. This is an underexplored field, with fewer than 300 publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (keywords used: Polyhydroxyalkanoates/PHAs/PHB, carbon dioxide/CO2, methane/CH4, fermentation/bioconversion for analyzing PHAs production from CO2, and fermentation/bioconversion for analyzing PHA production from CH4); however, it is gaining traction, with over 80% of these studies published within the last decade [199]. Challenges identified include low productivity, limited microbial species, and inefficient gas-to-liquid transfer rates, and may be addressed by stress-induced PHA production, the use of thermophilic microbial communities, and advancements in co-culturing and genetic engineering. Techniques such as using water-in-oil emulsions have improved PHA synthesis, significantly increasing microbial growth and PHA accumulation. Mixed carbon sources, like biogas, also enhance polymer properties, particularly poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)), a widely studied PHA. This technology is exemplified by the company Mango Materials, which partners with and capitalizes on methane-producing facilities such as landfills and wastewater treatment plants. The company uses a consortium of methanotrophs to primarily produce P(3HB) pellets that have been optimized for versatility, finding applications in injection molding, fiber extrusion, additive manufacturing, and other plastic-substitute uses. Within approximately six weeks, the material disintegrates due to microbial activity in the ocean, without leaving harmful residues. This makes the material environmentally sustainable and suitable for reducing plastic pollution in aquatic ecosystems [208].

3.4. Construction Sector

Rigid flame-retardant foam as a building material synthesized from bio-based sucrose-furanic resin: Bio-based foams present a promising alternative to conventional foams widely used as insulation materials in different sectors, particularly the construction and building industries. Bio-based foams offer some advantages over fossil-based foams including sustainability and low cost [15]. The flame-retardant properties of sucrose-furanic resin material have been studied by Dong et al. [196]. The study synthesized sucrose-based foams by incorporating crosslinking agents: glyoxal and furfuryl alcohol into sucrose to form a sucrose-furan-glyoxal (SFG) resin, and the subsequent addition of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (ADP) and azodicarbonamide (AC) to obtain SFGA foam. Analytical results showed that the SFGA foam has a temperature of heat resistance index of 116.40 °C and a limiting oxygen index (LOI) of 43.3% which meets the building B1 standard (LOI ≥ 32%). The SFGA foam exhibited excellent thermal insulation capabilities, making it suitable for use as a flame retardant. Compared to conventional flame retardants, which emit harmful gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide during combustion, the SFGA foam emits acetic acid, carbon dioxide, and oxanes. A biodegradability test also shows that the foam is biodegradable, attaining a weight loss of 2.7% after 30 days of being buried in the soil. Overall, the SFGA foam attained the UL-94 V-0 flame-retardant classification and hence can be used as an alternative flame retardant [196].
The synthesis of chitin/chitosan biocomposite foams for sound absorption using chitins from different organisms: Wachsmann et al. [197] conducted a comprehensive study on the sound absorption properties of chitin/chitosan biocomposite foam. The study implored a “shake and bake” method of synthesizing chitin/chitosan-based foam by mixing different amounts of chitin of the fungus A. niger α-ChiGL (α-chitin with glucan), snow crab C. opilio α-ChiSC (α-chitin), or squid C. coleoidea β-ChiSQ (β-chitin) with a solution of chitosan and starch to form a slurry, which was subsequently mixed with ammonium carbonate, generating a carbon dioxide as the foaming agent in an acidic medium. A mechanical test analysis showed that the chitin foams exhibit mechanical properties comparable to medium-density (MD) flexible polymer foams, with α-chitin similar to low-density and β-chitin similar to medium-density polymers. The study also reported that the synthesized foams recorded a total heat release (THR) of 16.96−17.96 kJ/g and 16.52–17.14 kJ/g for the α-chitin-based foam and β-chitin-based foams, which are comparatively lower than a commercial insulation material, with expanded polystyrene (EPS) and extruded polystyrene (XPS) having a THR of 24−45 kJ/g. These findings highlight the superiority of the chitin-based foams in terms of fire safety. The chitin-based foams exhibit good sound absorption coefficient maxima in a range of 0.79–0.94, corresponding to 600−2000 Hz, making them suitable for use in daily street noise (sound cancellation in the range of 700−1300 Hz). The sound absorption properties of the chitin foams are comparable to existing sound-absorber materials such as Rockwool (0.9, 500 Hz) and other absorber panels (0.90, 1000 Hz) [197,209].

3.5. Textile Sector

Promoting Green Fashion through State-of-the-Art Sustainable Leather Alternatives: The textile industry is one of the most environmentally harmful industries, accounting for 20% of water pollution and 10% of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) production globally. Additionally, it reportedly utilizes an average of 400 m2 of land, 9 m3 of water, and 391 kg of raw materials while generating 270 kg of CO2 emissions per year per capita. Its contribution to environmental pollution is not limited to the manufacturing process, but also throughout its lifecycle. During use, microfibers are released during washing, and less than 1% are recycled, with the remainder often ending up in landfills, thereby exacerbating waste and pollution concerns. Despite this, the demand for textiles continues to rise, with projections indicating a global production of 145 million tonnes by 2030, driving the demand for alternative, animal and petrochemical-free biotextiles [210].
Companies such as TômTex, Modern Synthesis, and MYCOWorksTM are driving innovation in sustainable biotextiles. TômTex creates 100% certified bio-based textiles that have a much lower environmental impact by requiring only 0.1% of the water used in conventional leather production and 80–90% less GHG emissions. They offer biodegradable, petrochemical-free, and customizable products made of sustainably sourced chitosan from mushrooms and shrimp and crab shells for their TômTex Series MTM and Series WSTM, respectively [198]. ModernSynthesis creates bacterial nanocellulose-based textiles from agricultural residues, offering lightweight, leather-like, biodegradable materials with high tensile strength (about 8 times that of steel) through a closed-loop system. Natural fibers are utilized as microbial scaffolds, providing a framework for microbes to grow and produce nanocellulose during fermentation. As this process occurs, the textile material forms around the scaffold, creating a structured and functional product [199]. MycoWorks™ creates leather-like materials with specific strength, performance, and aesthetic requirements by leveraging its patented Fine Mycelium™ technology, which involves the precise engineering and monitoring of mycelium growth. The biomaterial still undergoes tanning and finishing processes, but the company employs a proprietary chrome-free tanning and dyeing technology designed to minimize environmental impact [200].
Harnessing genetic engineering for creating pigmented biotextiles from bacterial cellulose: Genetic engineering can be utilized to further enhance the sustainability of biotextiles made from bacterial cellulose by creating microbial strains capable of producing self-pigmenting materials. An example of this is the genetic modification of Komagataeibacter rhaeticus performed by Walker et al. [201] to express the Tyr1 tyrosinase gene obtained from Bacillus megaterium. This enzyme catalyzes the oxidation of L-tyrosine into dopaquinone, which eventually converts into eumelanin, the pigment responsible for dark colors like brown and black. Two Tyr1 expression strains were produced, namely, the plasmid-based K. rhaeticus ptyr1 and chromosomally integrated K. rhaeticus ctyr1. A two-step process was developed involving the culturing of the Tyr1-expressing bacteria under normal acidic growth conditions followed by melanin synthesis, which requires a specific melanin development buffer with basic pH. The melanated pellicle production was successful, with the darkest color observed after 19 h. It was found that adjusting the time and L-tyrosine concentration in both the culture medium and melanin development buffer allowed for the creation of various shades of brown and black. The melanin pigment proved resistant to sterilization by high-pressure steam and ethanol but not to oxidizing agents like sodium hypochlorite. It withstood the water spotting test and showed high stability with no visible discoloration. Moreover, the pigment persisted, and minimal changes were observed even after 42 months of testing. Notably, it can likewise be patterned using light sources. Testing revealed no significant differences in tensile strength or porosity between melanated and unmelanated pellicles. However, melanated pellicles showed increased hydrophilicity, with the contact angle dropping from 47° to 28°. This means that waterproofing may be required, either by using natural materials or through further genetic modifications to alter the structure or create a hydrophobic layer. Future research could explore the creation of other pigment variations [201].

4. Future Development Trends

The advancement of biomaterials based on natural polymers seeks to maximize the industrial revolution in various fields such as biomedicine, sustainable materials, environmental biotechnology, and advanced manufacturing. As the demand for biodegradable, biocompatible, and functionally adaptive materials is rapidly increasing, it has become imperative for research to focus on enhanced fabrication methods, hybrid material innovation, and diversifying applications. According to the current literature prognosis [211], the rapid demand for bio-based products in the global market is driven by regulatory policies, environmental concerns, and technological advancements. Production capacity in 2023 increased to 4.4 million tonnes, representing 1% of the total polymer market, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17% projected until 2028. Asia and North America are specifically experiencing the fastest growth, where companies are investing in sustainable polymer production [211].
Significant trends observed recently include the integration of advanced fabrication technologies such as 3D/4D bioprinting, electrospinning, bioelectronics, smart biomaterials, personalized biomaterials, new generation hydrogels, antimicrobial solutions, immunomodulatory biomaterials, biodegradable polymers/metals, and nanotechnology, which enable the precise structuring of biomaterials for various applications [212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222]. Natural-based hydrogels like chitosan, sodium alginate, hyaluronic acid, and cellulose have gained prospects due to their high water content, biocompatibility, and similarity to the extracellular matrix (ECM), making these biopolymers ideal for tissue scaffolds, biosensors, and controlled drug release systems [222,223]. It was found by Barhoum et al. [224] that bio-based hydrogels are being developed with stimuli-bioresponsive properties, enabling the production of new-generation materials applied as implantable, wearable, and disposable biosensors for medical diagnostics [224]. Figure 20 illustrates various significant shifts in the recent utilization of biomaterials, demonstrating their growing dominance in contemporary society.
Key development trends include the development of transformative nanorobots through fabrication techniques such as two-photon polymerization (TPP) to enable precise 3D micro/nanostructures with submicron resolution, critical for creating biodegradable, stimuli-responsive robots for targeted drug delivery [218] and the development of new elastic materials for soft living tissue 3D printing. Researchers of Northeastern University Bioengineering recently patented a new elastic hydrogel material for such applications and made a significant assertion that a breakthrough is expected to lead to the 3D printing of blood vessels and human organs very soon [225]. Delgado-Puyol et al. [219] also discuss a shift toward stimuli-responsive biomaterials, particularly hydrogels and nanogels, laying emphasis on personalized medicine through 3D-printed and injectable systems, patient-specific bioinks, and organs-on-chips with sensors that adapt to patient-specific anatomical or pathological conditions. These biomaterials enable precise drug release via pH, temperature, or enzymatic triggers [219]. Biodegradable metallic materials have also seen a significant rise in medical implants by combining mechanical strength akin to human bone with in vivo degradability, eliminating secondary removal surgeries. These metallic materials including magnesium, zinc, and iron alloys are being investigated thoroughly with innovations focusing on surface modifications (e.g., fluoride coatings for Mg alloys) to control corrosion and leveraging 3D printing to fabricate patient-specific implants, despite challenges in surface roughness and structural precision [217].
Another promising development in bioelectronics is the development of neurostimulators. Implantable neurostimulators like spinal cord stimulators are being developed for chronic pain management by delivering electrical pulses to specific nerves to disrupt pain signals and provide relief to patients. Beyond that, they hold enormous promise in treating neurological disorders. For instance, brain–machine interfaces and neuromodulation devices are designed to address conditions like epilepsy, depression, and neurodegenerative diseases through direct interaction with the nervous system to either stimulate or inhibit neural activities to restore proper function. The future of healthcare is becoming more reliant on unlocking bioelectronic device advancements [212]. Despite these advancements, several challenges remain, as highlighted earlier. Biomaterials based on natural polymers are often limited by poor mechanical strength, batch-to-batch variability, and rapid degradation, which make it challenging for applications including load-bearing medical devices and long-term implants [223]. Strategies such as chemical crosslinking, nanocomposite reinforcement, and enzymatic modifications are expected to take over since they enhance stability and durability [222]. However, chemical crosslinking, which utilizes chemical agents such as acids and glutaraldehyde, may have a negative impact on the environment when released in quantities. Additionally, cost-effective mass-production techniques are needed to bridge the gap between laboratory research and industrial-scale manufacturing. Nevertheless, with consistent improvements in processing techniques, material engineering, and policy support from relevant stakeholders, these biomaterials will be central to next-generation materials for various eco-friendly industrial applications and functional biotechnological approaches.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.L.; data curation, O.A., P.S.A.N., F.A.M. and N.B.C.; validation, K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, O.A., P.S.A.N., F.A.M. and N.B.C.; writing—review and editing, K.L.; visualization, O.A., P.S.A.N., F.A.M., N.B.C. and K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Oscar Amponsah, Prince Sungdewie Adama Nopuo, Felista Adrehem Manga, and Nicole Bianca Catli are grateful to the Erasmus Mundus Joint Master program, Sustainable Biomass and Bioproducts Engineering, Project 101050789 Sus2BioEng, for financial support for their study and research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. United Nations Environment Programme, International Resource Panel. Global Resources Outlook 2024—Bend the Trend: Pathways to a Liveable Planet as Resource Use Spikes; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2024; Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/44901 (accessed on 1 August 2024).
  2. Le, D.L.; Salomone, R.; Nguyen, Q.T. Circular bio-based building materials: A literature review of case studies and sustainability assessment methods. Build. Environ. 2023, 244, 110774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tan, E.C.D.; Lamers, P. Circular bioeconomy concepts—A perspective. Front. Sustain. 2021, 2, 701509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pandit, P.; Nadathur, G.T.; Maiti, S.; Regubalan, B. Functionality and properties of bio-based materials. In Bio-Based Materials for Food Packaging: Green and Sustainable Advanced Packaging Materials; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 81–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fusteș-Dămoc, I.; Dinu, R.; Măluțan, T.; Mija, A. Valorisation of chitosan natural building block as a primary strategy for the development of sustainable fully bio-based epoxy resins. Polymers 2023, 15, 4627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nwabike, A.A.; Elemike, E.E.; Akpeji, H.B.; Amitaye, E.; Hossain, I.; Mbonu, J.I.; Aziza, A.E. Chitosan: A Sustainable Biobased Material for Diverse Applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silva, A.C.Q.; Silvestre, A.J.D.; Vilela, C.; Freire, C.S.R. Natural Polymers-Based Materials: A Contribution to a Greener Future. Molecules 2022, 27, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singhvi, M.S.; Zinjarde, S.S.; Gokhale, D.V. Polylactic Acid: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1612–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rico-Llanos, G.A.; Borrego-González, S.; Moncayo-Donoso, M.; Becerra, J.; Visser, R. Collagen Type I Biomaterials as Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Polymers 2021, 13, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Swetha, T.A.; Bora, A.; Mohanrasu, K.; Balaji, P.; Raja, R.; Ponnuchamy, K.; Muthusamy, G.; Arun, A. A Comprehensive Review on Polylactic Acid (PLA)—Synthesis, Processing and Application in Food Packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fijoł, N.; Aguilar-Sánchez, A.; Mathew, A.P. 3D-Printable Biopolymer-Based Materials for Water Treatment: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 430, 132801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andrew, J.J.; Dhakal, H.N. Sustainable Biobased Composites for Advanced Applications: Recent Trends and Future Opportunities—A Critical Review. Compos. Part C Open Access 2022, 7, 100220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mahmud, M.Z.A.; Rabbi, S.M.F.; Islam, M.D.; Hossain, N. Synthesis and Applications of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Epoxy Composites: A Comprehensive Review. SPE Polym. 2024, 5, e12345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q.; Li, R.; Li, B.; Wang, J. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical and Interconnected Honeycomb-Like Porous Carbon Derived from Pomelo Peel for High Performance Supercapacitors. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 257, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Capêto, A.P.; Amorim, M.; Sousa, S.; Costa, J.R.; Uribe, B.; Guimarães, A.S.; Pintado, M.; Oliveira, A.L.S. Fire-Resistant Bio-Based Polyurethane Foams Designed with Two By-Products Derived from Sugarcane Fermentation Process. Waste Biomass Valorization 2024, 15, 2045–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kore, S.D.; Sudarsan, J.S. Hemp Concrete: A Sustainable Green Material for Conventional Concrete. J. Build. Mater. Sci. 2021, 3, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Weiss, M.; Haufe, J.; Carus, M.; Brandão, M.; Bringezu, S.; Hermann, B.; Patel, M.K. A Review of the Environmental Impacts of Biobased Materials. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, S169–S181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Azeredo, H.M.C.; Barud, H.; Farinas, C.S.; Vasconcellos, V.M.; Claro, A.M. Bacterial Cellulose as a Raw Material for Food and Food Packaging Applications. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019, 3, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gabryś, T.; Fryczkowska, B.; Fabia, J.; Biniaś, D. Preparation of an Active Dressing by In Situ Biosynthesis of a Bacterial Cellulose–Graphene Oxide Composite. Polymers 2022, 14, 2800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gupta, G.K.; De, S.; Franco, A.; Balu, A.M.; Luque, R. Sustainable Biomaterials: Current Trends, Challenges and Applications. Molecules 2016, 21, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ullah, S.; Chen, X. Fabrication, Applications and Challenges of Natural Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dalwadi, S.; Goel, A.; Kapetanakis, C.; Salas-de la Cruz, D.; Hu, X. The Integration of Biopolymer-Based Materials for Energy Storage Applications: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ansari, M.M.; Heo, Y.; Do, K.; Ghosh, M.; Son, Y.O. Nanocellulose Derived from Agricultural Biowaste By-Products–Sustainable Synthesis, Biocompatibility, Biomedical Applications, and Future Perspectives: A Review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2024, 8, 100529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanskul, S.; Amornthatree, K.; Jaturonlak, N. A New Cellulose-Producing Bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. MI 2: Screening and Optimization of Culture Conditions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ververis, C.; Georghiou, K.; Christodoulakis, N.; Santas, P.; Santas, R. Fiber Dimensions, Lignin and Cellulose Content of Various Plant Materials and Their Suitability for Paper Production. Ind. Crops Prod. 2004, 19, 245–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. De Amorim, J.D.P.; de Souza, K.C.; Duarte, C.R.; da Silva Duarte, I.; de Assis Sales Ribeiro, F.; Silva, G.S.; De Farias, P.M.A.; Stingl, A.; Costa, A.F.S.; Vinhas, G.M.; et al. Plant and Bacterial Nanocellulose: Production, Properties and Applications in Medicine, Food, Cosmetics, Electronics and Engineering—A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 851–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Portela, R.; Leal, C.R.; Almeida, P.L.; Sobral, R.G. Bacterial Cellulose: A Versatile Biopolymer for Wound Dressing Applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 586–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Betlej, I.; Antczak, A.; Szadkowski, J.; Drożdżek, M.; Krajewski, K.; Radomski, A.; Zawadzki, J.; Borysiak, S. Evaluation of the Hydrolysis Efficiency of Bacterial Cellulose Gel Film after the Liquid Hot Water and Steam Explosion Pretreatments. Polymers 2022, 14, 2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yassin, M.A.; Gad, A.A.M.; Ghanem, A.F.; Abdel Rehim, M.H. Green Synthesis of Cellulose Nanofibers Using Immobilized Cellulase. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 205, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ventura-Cruz, S.; Tecante, A. Extraction and Characterization of Cellulose Nanofibers from Rose Stems (Rosa spp.). Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 220, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kirdponpattara, S.; Khamkeaw, A.; Sanchavanakit, N.; Pavasant, P.; Phisalaphong, M. Structural Modification and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose–Alginate Composite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, J.; Cai, Z.; Lee, H.S.; Choi, G.S.; Lee, D.H.; Jo, C. Preparation and Characterization of a Bacterial Cellulose/Chitosan Composite for Potential Biomedical Application. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zia, K.M.; Zia, F.; Zuber, M.; Rehman, S.; Ahmad, M.N. Alginate Based Polyurethanes: A Review of Recent Advances and Perspective. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 79, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, J.; Tan, H. Alginate-Based Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine Applications. Materials 2013, 6, 1285–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hurtado, A.; Aljabali, A.A.A.; Mishra, V.; Tambuwala, M.M.; Serrano-Aroca, Á. Alginate: Enhancement Strategies for Advanced Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mati-Baouche, N.; Elchinger, P.H.; De Baynast, H.; Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Michaud, P. Chitosan as an Adhesive. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 60, 198–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gadgey, K.K.; Bahekar, A. Investigation on Uses of Crab Based Chitin and Its Derivatives. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 2017, 8, 456–466. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jiménez-Gómez, C.P.; Cecilia, J.A. Chitosan: A Natural Biopolymer with a Wide and Varied Range of Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 3981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alemu, D.; Getachew, E.; Mondal, A.K. Study on the Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan and Their Applications in the Biomedical Sector. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 2023, 5025341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kaewprachu, P.; Jaisan, C. Physicochemical Properties of Chitosan from Green Mussel Shells (Perna viridis): A Comparative Study. Polymers 2023, 15, 2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Di Liberto, E.A.; Dintcheva, N.T. Biobased Films Based on Chitosan and Microcrystalline Cellulose for Sustainable Packaging Applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gomes, D.; Batista-Silva, J.P.; Sousa, A.; Passarinha, L.A. Progress and Opportunities in Gellan Gum-Based Materials: A Review of Preparation, Characterization and Emerging Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 311, 120732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dev, M.J.; Warke, R.G.; Warke, G.M.; Mahajan, G.B.; Patil, T.A.; Singhal, R.S. Advances in fermentative production, purification, characterization and applications of gellan gum. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 359, 127498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Peng, X.; Zhu, L.; Guo, J.; Sun, Z.; Zhao, M.; Zhan, X. Enhancing biocompatibility and neuronal anti-inflammatory activity of polymyxin B through conjugation with gellan gum. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 147, 734–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aliabadi, H.A.M.; Forouzandeh-Malati, M.; Hassanzadeh-Afruzi, F.; Noruzi, E.B.; Ganjali, F.; Kashtiaray, A.; Bani, M.S.; Eftekhari, R.B.; Eivazzadeh-Keihan, R.; Maleki, A. Magnetic xanthan gum-silk fibroin hydrogel: A nanocomposite for biological and hyperthermia applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Das, M.; Giri, T.K. Hydrogels based on gellan gum in cell delivery and drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 56, 101586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Muthukumar, T.; Song, J.E.; Khang, G. Biological role of gellan gum in improving scaffold drug delivery, cell adhesion properties for tissue engineering applications. Molecules 2019, 24, 4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, C.S.; Hwang, H.S. Starch-Based Hydrogels as a Drug Delivery System in Biomedical Applications. Gels 2023, 9, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Falua, K.J.; Pokharel, A.; Babaei-Ghazvini, A.; Ai, Y.; Acharya, B. Valorization of Starch to Biobased Materials: A Review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tiwari, A. Recent Developments in Bio-Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  51. Casettari, L.; Bonacucina, G.; Morris, G.A.; Perinelli, D.R.; Lucaioli, P.; Cespi, M.; Palmieri, G.F. Dextran and its potential use as tablet excipient. Powder Technol. 2015, 273, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Díaz-Montes, E. Dextran: Sources, Structures, and Properties. Polysaccharides 2021, 2, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Radke, W.; Held, D.; Bock, H.; Kilz, P. Molecular Weight Determination of Dextran According to USP/EP Monograph; Agilent Technologies: Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://lcms.cz/labrulez-bucket-strapi-h3hsga3/an_wingpc_dextran_usp_ep_gpc_sec_5994_5763en_agilent_d1fd4c393f/an-wingpc-dextran-usp-ep-gpc-sec-5994-5763en-agilent.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2024).
  54. Kavlak, S. Effects of Molecular Weight of Dextran on Dynamic Mechanical Properties in Functional Polymer Blend Systems. Hacet. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 50, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. García-Gareta, E.; Coathup, M.J.; Blunn, G.W. Osteoinduction of bone grafting materials for bone repair and regeneration. Bone 2015, 81, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wei, X.; Liu, G.L.; Jia, S.L.; Chi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Chi, Z.M. Pullulan biosynthesis and its regulation in Aureobasidium spp. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Souza, C.K.; Ghosh, T.; Lukhmana, N.; Tahiliani, S.; Priyadarshi, R.; Hoffmann, T.G.; Purohit, S.D.; Han, S.S. Pullulan as a sustainable biopolymer for versatile applications: A review. Mater. Today Commun. 2023, 36, 105469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tiwari, S.; Patil, R.; Dubey, S.K.; Bahadur, P. Derivatization approaches and applications of pullulan. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2019, 269, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Singh, R.S.; Kaur, N.; Kennedy, J.F. Pullulan production from agro-industrial waste and its applications in food industry: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 217, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kobayashi, H.; Katakura, O.; Morimoto, N.; Akiyoshi, K.; Kasugai, S. Effects of cholesterol-bearing pullulan (CHP)-nanogels in combination with prostaglandin E1 on wound healing. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2009, 91, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thangavel, P.; Vilvanathan, S.P.; Kuttalam, I.; Lonchin, S. Topical administration of pullulan gel accelerates skin tissue regeneration by enhancing collagen synthesis and wound contraction in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 149, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Autissier, A.; Letourneur, D.; Le Visage, C. Pullulan-based hydrogel for smooth muscle cell culture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2007, 82, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Morimoto, N.; Endo, T.; Iwasaki, Y.; Akiyoshi, K. Design of hybrid hydrogels with self-assembled nanogels as cross-linkers: Interaction with proteins and chaperone-like activity. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6, 1829–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Brun-Graeppi, A.K.A.S.; Richard, C.; Bessodes, M.; Scherman, D.; Merten, O.W. Cell microcarriers and microcapsules of stimuli-responsive polymers. J. Control. Release 2011, 149, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nilsson, K.; Scheirer, W.; Merten, O.W.; Östberg, L.; Liehl, E.; Katinger, H.W.D.; Mosbach, K. Entrapment of animal cells for production of monoclonal antibodies and other biomolecules. Nature 1983, 302, 629–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Karoubi, G.; Ormiston, M.L.; Stewart, D.J.; Courtman, D.W. Single-cell hydrogel encapsulation for enhanced survival of human marrow stromal cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 5445–5455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Parenteau-Bareil, R.; Gauvin, R.; Berthod, F. Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials 2010, 3, 1863–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, Q.; Pei, Y.; Tang, K.; Albu-Kaya, M.G. Structure, Extraction, Processing, and Applications of Collagen as an Ideal Component for Biomaterials—A Review. Collagen Leather 2023, 5, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rezvani Ghomi, E.; Nourbakhsh, N.; Akbari Kenari, M.; Zare, M.; Ramakrishna, S. Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2021, 109, 1986–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhu, J.; Li, Z.; Zou, Y.; Lu, G.; Ronca, A.; D’Amora, U.; Chen, F.; Chen, Z.; Lin, H.; Fan, Y. Advanced Application of Collagen-Based Biomaterials in Tissue Repair and Restoration. J. Leather Sci. Eng. 2022, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Andreazza, R.; Morales, A.; Pieniz, S.; Labidi, J. Gelatin-Based Hydrogels: Potential Biomaterials for Remediation. Polymers 2023, 15, 1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Valcarcel, J.; Fraguas, J.; Hermida-Merino, C.; Hermida-Merino, D.; Piñeiro, M.M.; Vázquez, J.A. Production and Physicochemical Characterization of Gelatin and Collagen Hydrolysates from Turbot Skin Waste Generated by Aquaculture Activities. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Cao, H.; Wang, J.; Hao, Z.; Zhao, D. Gelatin-Based Biomaterials and Gelatin as an Additive for Chronic Wound Repair. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1398939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Han, K.; Bai, Q.; Wu, W.; Sun, N.; Cui, N.; Lu, T. Gelatin-Based Adhesive Hydrogel with Self-Healing, Hemostasis, and Electrical Conductivity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 183, 2142–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chaudhary, J.; Thakur, S.; Mamba, G.; Prateek; Gupta, R.K.; Thakur, V.K. Hydrogel of Gelatin in the Presence of Graphite for the Adsorption of Dye: Towards the Concept for Water Purification. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 104694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Marciano, J.S.; Ferreira, R.R.; de Souza, A.G.; Barbosa, R.F.S.; de Moura Junior, A.J.; Rosa, D.S. Biodegradable Gelatin Composite Hydrogels Filled with Cellulose for Chromium (VI) Adsorption from Contaminated Water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 181, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kumar Sahi, A.; Gundu, S.; Kumari, P.; Klepka, T.; Sionkowska, A. Silk-Based Biomaterials for Designing Bioinspired Microarchitecture for Various Biomedical Applications. Biomimetics 2023, 8, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Le, B.H.T.; Minh, T.; Nguyen, D.; Minh, D. Naturally Derived Biomaterials: Preparation and Application. In Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering; Andrades, J.A., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Saikia, S.; Saikia, M. Physical and Chemical Properties of Indian Silk Fibres. Pharma Innov. J. 2022, 11, 732–738. [Google Scholar]
  80. Gamboa-Martínez, T.C.; Gómez Ribelles, J.L.; Gallego Ferrer, G. Fibrin Coating on Poly (L-lactide) Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering. J. Bioact. Compat. Polym. 2011, 26, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rojas-Murillo, J.A.; Simental-Mendía, M.A.; Moncada-Saucedo, N.K.; Delgado-Gonzalez, P.; Islas, J.F.; Roacho-Pérez, J.A.; Garza-Treviño, E.N. Physical, Mechanical, and Biological Properties of Fibrin Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Brown, A.C.; Barker, T.H. Fibrin-Based Biomaterials: Modulation of Macroscopic Properties through Rational Design at the Molecular Level. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1502–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wein, S.; Schemmer, C.; Al Enezy-Ulbrich, M.A.; Jung, S.A.; Rütten, S.; Kühnel, M.; Jonigk, D.; Jahnen-Dechent, W.; Pich, A.; Neuss, S. Fibrin-Based Hydrogels with Reactive Amphiphilic Copolymers for Mechanical Adjustments Allow for Capillary Formation in 2D and 3D Environments. Gels 2024, 10, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bencherif, S.A. Fibrin: An Underrated Biopolymer for Skin Tissue Engineering. J. Regen. Med. 2017, 6, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  85. Gonzalez de Torre, I.; Alonso, M.; Rodriguez-Cabello, J.C. Elastin-Based Materials: Promising Candidates for Cardiac Tissue Regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Prado-Audelo, M.L.; Mendoza-Muñoz, N.; Escutia-Guadarrama, L.; Giraldo-Gomez, D.M.; González-Torres, M.; Florán, B.; Cortés, H.; Leyva-Gomez, G. Recent Advances in Elastin-Based Biomaterials. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 23, 314–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Wang, K.; Meng, X.; Guo, Z. Elastin Structure, Synthesis, Regulatory Mechanism and Relationship with Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 596622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Tarakanova, A.; Chang, S.W.; Buehler, M.J. Computational Materials Science of Bionanomaterials: Structure, Mechanical Properties and Applications of Elastin and Collagen Proteins. In Handbook of Nanomaterials Properties; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 941–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Moscarelli, P.; Boraldi, F.; Bochicchio, B.; Pepe, A.; Salvi, A.M.; Quaglino, D. Structural Characterization and Biological Properties of the Amyloidogenic Elastin-Like Peptide (VGGVG)3. Matrix Biol. 2014, 36, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Guo, Y.; Liu, S.; Jing, D.; Liu, N.; Luo, X. The Construction of Elastin-Like Polypeptides and Their Applications in Drug Delivery System and Tissue Repair. J. Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Tansaz, S.; Boccaccini, A.R. Biomedical Applications of Soy Protein: A Brief Overview. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2016, 104, 553–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chien, K.B.; Aguado, B.A.; Bryce, P.J.; Shah, R.N. In Vivo Acute and Humoral Response to Three-Dimensional Porous Soy Protein Scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2013, 9, 8983–8990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, L.; Xiao, M.; Dai, S.; Song, J.; Ni, X.; Fang, Y.; Corke, H.; Jiang, F. Interactions Between Carboxymethyl Konjac Glucomannan and Soy Protein Isolate in Blended Films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Nishinari, K.; Fang, Y.; Guo, S.; Phillips, G.O. Soy Proteins: A Review on Composition, Aggregation and Emulsification. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 39, 301–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Shankar, A.; Seyam, A.F.M.; Hudson, S.M. Electrospinning of Soy Protein Fibers and Their Compatibility with Synthetic Polymers. J. Text. Appar. Technol. Manag. 2013, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  96. Peles, Z.; Binderman, I.; Berdicevsky, I.; Zilberman, M. Soy Protein Films for Wound-Healing Applications: Antibiotic Release, Bacterial Inhibition and Cellular Response. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2013, 7, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhao, S.; Yao, J.; Fei, X.; Shao, Z.; Chen, X. An Antimicrobial Film by Embedding In Situ Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles in Soy Protein Isolate. Mater. Lett. 2013, 95, 142–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gbassi, G.K.; Yolou, F.S.; Sarr, S.O.; Atheba, P.G.; Amin, C.N.; Ake, M. Whey Proteins Analysis in Aqueous Medium and in Artificial Gastric and Intestinal Fluids. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2012, 6, 1828–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Tang, C.; Xi, T.; Zheng, J.; Cui, X. Chemical Properties of Whey Protein in Protein Powders and Its Impact on Muscle Growth in Athletes: A Review. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2025, 20, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Soumati, B.; Atmani, M.; Benabderrahmane, A.; Benjelloun, M. Whey Valorization—Innovative Strategies for Sustainable Development and Value-Added Product Creation. J. Ecol. Eng. 2023, 24, 86–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rascón-Cruz, Q.; Espinoza-Sánchez, E.A.; Siqueiros-Cendón, T.S.; Nakamura-Bencomo, S.I.; Arévalo-Gallegos, S.; Iglesias-Figueroa, B.F. Lactoferrin: A Glycoprotein Involved in Immunomodulation, Anticancer, and Antimicrobial Processes. Molecules 2021, 26, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Mehra, R.; Kumar, H.; Kumar, N.; Ranvir, S.; Jana, A.; Buttar, H.S.; Telessy, I.G.; Awuchi, C.G.; Okpala, C.O.R.; Korzeniowska, M.; et al. Whey Proteins Processing and Emergent Derivatives: An Insight Perspective from Constituents, Bioactivities, Functionalities to Therapeutic Applications. J. Funct. Foods 2021, 87, 104760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Smithers, G.W. Whey and Whey Proteins—From “Gutter-to-Gold”. Int. Dairy. J. 2008, 18, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pillai, A.T.; Morya, S.; Kasankala, L.M. Emerging Trends in Bioavailability and Pharma-Nutraceutical Potential of Whey Bioactives. J. Nutr. Metab. 2024, 2024, 8455666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Goyal, C.; Dhyani, P.; Rai, D.C.; Tyagi, S.; Dhull, S.B.; Sadh, P.K.; Duhan, J.S.; Saharan, B.S. Emerging Trends and Advancements in the Processing of Dairy Whey for Sustainable Biorefining. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2023, 2023, 6626513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Li, L.; Kiick, K.L. Resilin-Based Materials for Biomedical Applications. ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Silva, R.; Fabry, B.; Boccaccini, A.R. Fibrous Protein-Based Hydrogels for Cell Encapsulation. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 6727–6738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Su, R.S.C.; Kim, Y.; Liu, J.C. Resilin: Protein-Based Elastomeric Biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 1601–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Li, L.; Wen, T. Estimation of C-MGARCH Models Based on the MBP Method. Stat. Probab. Lett. 2013, 83, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Renner, J.N.; Cherry, K.M.; Su, R.S.C.; Liu, J.C. Characterization of Resilin-Based Materials for Tissue Engineering Applications. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 3678–3685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Truong, M.Y.; Dutta, N.K.; Choudhury, N.R.; Kim, M.; Elvin, C.M.; Hill, A.J.; Thierry, B.; Vasilev, K. A pH-Responsive Interface Derived from Resilin-Mimetic Protein Rec1-Resilin. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 4434–4446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Salehi, M.; Cornish, K.; Bahmankar, M.; Naghavi, M.R. Natural Rubber-Producing Sources, Systems, and Perspectives for Breeding and Biotechnology Studies of Taraxacum kok-saghyz. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Nurchi, C.; Buonvino, S.; Arciero, I.; Melino, S. Sustainable Vegetable Oil-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 12345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Park, J.Y.; Lee, Y.K.; Lee, D.S.; Yoo, J.E.; Shin, M.S.; Yamabe, N.; Kim, S.-N.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, H.-J.; et al. Abietic Acid Isolated from Pine Resin (Resina Pini) Enhances Angiogenesis in HUVECs and Accelerates Cutaneous Wound Healing in Mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 203, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, X.Q.; Chen, Y. Rosin: A Comprehensive Review on Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry, and Pharmacology. Fitoterapia 2024, 177, 105321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Salwowska, N.M.; Bebenek, K.A.; Żądło, D.A.; Wcisło-Dziadecka, D.L. Physiochemical Properties and Application of Hyaluronic Acid: A Systematic Review. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2016, 15, 520–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lovely, B.; Kim, Y.T.; Huang, H.; Zink-Sharp, A.; Roman, M. Impacts of Cycles of a Novel Low-Pressure Homogenization Process on Cellulose Nanofibrils (CNF) as a Sustainable Packaging Film Material. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2025, 9, 100739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, T.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ye, H.; Yang, B. Bio-Based and Bio-Degradable Nanofiber Materials: A Sustainable Platform for Energy, Environmental, and Biomedical Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 491, 152105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Barhoum, A.; Pal, K.; Rahier, H.; Uludag, H.; Kim, I.S.; Bechelany, M. Nanofibers as New-Generation Materials: From Spinning and Nano-Spinning Fabrication Techniques to Emerging Applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 17, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Bai, F.; Wang, H.; Si, S.; Lu, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, S. Preparation of Cellulose Nanofibers from Bagasse by Phosphoric Acid and Hydrogen Peroxide Enables Fibrillation via a Swelling, Hydrolysis, and Oxidation Cooperative Mechanism. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Gao, H.; Liu, G.; Guan, J.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.; Ding, B. Biodegradable Hydro-Charging Polylactic Acid Melt-Blown Nonwovens with Efficient PM0.3 Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 458, 141412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhou, G.; Li, M.C.; Wang, F.; Liu, C.; Mei, C. 3D Printing of Cellulose Nanofiber Monoliths for Thermal Insulation and Energy Storage Applications. Addit. Manuf. 2022, 59, 103124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Xue, J.; Wu, T.; Dai, Y.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning and Electrospun Nanofibers: Methods, Materials, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. MKR, K.; MN, H.; AB, S.; HA, B. A Study on Microfluidic Spinning Technology (MST) Used for Micro Fibre Fabrication. Adv. Res. Text. Eng. 2021, 6, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wu, C.; Sun, J.; Zheng, P.; Kang, X.; Chen, M.; Li, Y.; Ge, Y.; Hu, Y.; Pang, J. Preparation of an Intelligent Film Based on Chitosan/Oxidized Chitin Nanocrystals Incorporating Black Rice Bran Anthocyanins for Seafood Spoilage Monitoring. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 222, 115006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zhu, X.; Li, B.; Fan, Y.; Yu, J. Direct Ink Writing of a Bio-Based Ink Made of Low Concentration Cellulose Nanofiber Crosslinked with Poly (Ethylene Glycol) via Hydroxyl-Yne Click Chemistry. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 306, 141267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Audette, G.F.; Yaseen, A.; Bragagnolo, N.; Bawa, R. Protein Nanotubes: From Bionanotech towards Medical Applications. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Li, W.; Wang, D.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Ma, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, R.; Yu, Z.; et al. A SiRNA-Induced Peptide Co-Assembly System as a Peptide-Based SiRNA Nanocarrier for Cancer Therapy. Mater. Horiz. 2018, 5, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Ji, Z.; Sheng, H.; Liu, H. Planting Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes onto Epoxidized Soybean Oil-Based Vitrimer to Construct a Biobased Photothermal Superhydrophobic Coating with Self-Healing and Closed-Loop Recyclability for Anti/Deicing. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 7147–7157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Qu, B.; Luo, Y. Chitosan-Based Hydrogel Beads: Preparations, Modifications and Applications in Food and Agriculture Sectors—A Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 152, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kaur, R.; Sharma, R.; Chahal, G.K. Synthesis of Lignin-Based Hydrogels and Their Applications in Agriculture: A Review. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 4465–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Parhi, R. Cross-Linked Hydrogel for Pharmaceutical Applications: A Review. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ramírez Martínez, C. Synthesis and Characterization of a Natural-Based Hydrogel for Biomedical Applications A Dissertation Presented By; Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey: Monterey City, Mexico, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  134. Rajanna, G.A.; Manna, S.; Singh, A.; Babu, S.; Singh, V.K.; Dass, A.; Chakraborty, D.; Patanjali, N.; Chopra, I.; Banerjee, T.; et al. Biopolymeric Superabsorbent Hydrogels Enhance Crop and Water Productivity of Soybean–Wheat System in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Guan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Lei, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, K.; Yu, G. From Scraps to Sips: Biomass-Based Hydrogel Pulls Drinking Water from Thin Air. Available online: https://phys.org/news/2025-02-scraps-biomass-based-hydrogel-thin.html (accessed on 30 May 2025).
  136. Nita, L.E.; Ghilan, A.; Rusu, A.G.; Neamtu, I.; Chiriac, A.P. New Trends in Bio-Based Aerogels. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mandić, V.; Bafti, A.; Panžić, I.; Radovanović-Perić, F. Bio-Based Aerogels in Energy Storage Systems. Gels 2024, 10, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. García-González, C.A.; Smirnova, I. Use of Supercritical Fluid Technology for the Production of Tailor-Made Aerogel Particles for Delivery Systems. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2013, 79, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, D.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, B.; Zhang, H.; Xia, Y.; Yang, D. Turning Gelidium Amansii Residue into Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanofiber Aerogel for Enhanced Multiple Energy Storage. Carbon 2018, 137, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Da Silva, M.A.; Krause Bierhalz, A.C. Biopolymer Films and Composite Coatings: Applications. In Handbook of Biopolymers; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 1229–1261. ISBN 9789811907104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lin, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhang, H.; An, C.; Li, C.; Wang, Q.; Song, J.; He, W.; Wang, H. Glycine/Alginate-Based Piezoelectric Film Consisting of a Single, Monolithic β-Glycine Spherulite towards Flexible and Biodegradable Force Sensor. Regen. Biomater. 2024, 11, rbae047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lizundia, E.; Costa, C.M.; Alves, R.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Cellulose and Its Derivatives for Lithium Ion Battery Separators: A Review on the Processing Methods and Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2020, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Xu, S.; Yue, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, M.; Zhou, H.; Jin, W. Pressure-Assisted Vacuum Filtration Fabrication of Polymer Membranes with Enhanced Selectivity for the Separation of an Ethanol/Carbon Dioxide Mixture. J. Memb. Sci. 2024, 701, 122765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Dong, X.; Lu, D.; Harris, T.A.L.; Escobar, I.C. Polymers and Solvents Used in Membrane Fabrication: A Review Focusing on Sustainable Membrane Development. Membranes 2021, 11, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Prazeres Mazur, L.; Reis Ferreira, R.; Felix da Silva Barbosa, R.; Henrique Santos, P.; Barcelos da Costa, T.; Gurgel Adeodato Vieira, M.; da Silva, A.; dos Santos Rosa, D.; Helena Innocentini Mei, L. Development of Novel Biopolymer Membranes by Electrospinning as Potential Adsorbents for Toxic Metal Ions Removal from Aqueous Solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 395, 123782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Elaissaoui, I.; Sayeb, S.; Ounif, I.; Ferhi, M.; Karima, H.N.; Ennigrou, D.J. Preparation and Characterization of Acetate Cellulose Electrospun Nanofibers Membrane: Potential Application on Wastewater Treatment. Heliyon 2024, 10, e32552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hashemi, H.; Ebrahimi, B.; Awlqadr, F.H.; Ov, N.S.; Ebdali, H.; Sarlak, Z.; Bahrami, L.; Mohammadi, R. Gelatin-Chitosan Based Composite Films Enriched with Satureja Kermanshahensis Jamzad Essential Oil Nanoemulsion and Carbon Dots: Characterization and Functional Properties. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 33, 1292–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hastuti, N.; Setiawan, H.; Kanomata, K.; Kitaoka, T. Cellulose nanofibers of oil palm biomass in alginate-based membranes for water-ethanol mixture separation. Cellul. Chem. Technol. 2022, 56, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. De Haro, J.C.; Tatsi, E.; Fagiolari, L.; Bonomo, M.; Barolo, C.; Turri, S.; Bella, F.; Griffini, G. Lignin-Based Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Sustainable Aqueous Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 8550–8560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yodsanga, S.; Poeaim, S.; Chantarangsu, S.; Swasdison, S. Investigation of Biodegradation and Biocompatibility of Chitosan–Bacterial Cellulose Composite Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Cells 2025, 14, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Aldhaher, A.; Shahabipour, F.; Shaito, A.; Al-Assaf, S.; Elnour, A.A.M.; Sallam, E.B.; Teimourtash, S.; Elfadil, A.A. 3D Hydrogel/Bioactive Glass Scaffolds in Bone Tissue Engineering: Status and Future Opportunities. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Gao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Kong, Q.; Feng, X.; Li, Z.; Xue, C. Food-Grade 3D-Printable Porous Scaffolds with Advanced Stem Cell Microenvironments Enabled by Bilayer Emulgel. Food Hydrocoll. 2025, 166, 111373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Pedram Rad, Z.; Mokhtari, J.; Abbasi, M. Biopolymer Based Three-Dimensional Biomimetic Micro/Nanofibers Scaffolds with Porous Structures via Tailored Charge Repulsions for Skin Tissue Regeneration. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 3535–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Koumentakou, I.; Michopoulou, A.; Noordam, M.J.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Bikiaris, D.N. 3D-Printed Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications Using Thermosensitive Hydrogels Based on Biopolymer Blends. J. Mater. Sci. 2024, 59, 9021–9041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Spessot, E.; Passuello, S.; Shah, L.V.; Maniglio, D.; Motta, A. Nanocomposite Methacrylated Silk Fibroin-Based Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Rajasekaran, S.; Kungumaraj, K.K.; Mani, D.; Mani, P. Chitosan/Guar Gum—Graphene Oxide Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 41, 110288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Beltran-Vargas, N.E.; Peña-Mercado, E.; Sánchez-Gómez, C.; Garcia-Lorenzana, M.; Ruiz, J.C.; Arroyo-Maya, I.; Huerta-Yepez, S.; Campos-Terán, J. Sodium Alginate/Chitosan Scaffolds for Cardiac Tissue Engineering: The Influence of Its Three-Dimensional Material Preparation and the Use of Gold Nanoparticles. Polymers 2022, 14, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Kaczmarek-Szczepańska, B.; Polkowska, I.; Małek, M.; Kluczyński, J.; Paździor-Czapula, K.; Wekwejt, M.; Michno, A.; Ronowska, A.; Pałubicka, A.; Nowicka, B.; et al. The Characterization of Collagen-Based Scaffolds Modified with Phenolic Acids for Tissue Engineering Application. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Makar, L.E.; Nady, N.; Shawky, N.; Kandil, S.H. Genipin versus Ferric Chloride Cross-Linked Unmodified Gum Arabic/Chitosan/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Hydrogels as Potential Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Petit, N.; Gomes, A.; Chang, Y.Y.J.; Da Silva, J.; Leal, E.C.; Carvalho, E.; Gomes, P.; Browne, S.; Browne, S.; Browne, S. Development of a Bioactive Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel Functionalised with Antimicrobial Peptides for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds. Biomater. Sci. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Xia, Z.; Guo, B.; Wu, D.; Yang, F.; Ding, Y. Advances of Natural Hydrogel-Based Vascularization Strategies for Soft Tissue Repair. Front. Mater. 2024, 11, 1446035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bashir, S.; Hina, M.; Iqbal, J.; Rajpar, A.H.; Mujtaba, M.A.; Alghamdi, N.A.; Wageh, S.; Ramesh, K.; Ramesh, S. Fundamental Concepts of Hydrogels: Synthesis, Properties, and Their Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 2702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Sapuła, P.; Bialik-Wąs, K.; Malarz, K. Are Natural Compounds a Promising Alternative to Synthetic Cross-Linking Agents in the Preparation of Hydrogels? Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Parkstam, A.; Karlsson, A.; Quakkelaar, L.; Askari, M.; Ahmed, S.S.; Eriksson, T.; Salazar Alvarez, G. Exploration of Bioactive Additives for Hyaluronan Based Hydrogels A Literature Study in Collaboration with Galderma; MAT-VET 22005; Uppsala University: Uppsala, Sweden, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  165. Peng, N.; Huang, D.; Gong, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Chang, C. Controlled Arrangement of Nanocellulose in Polymeric Matrix: From Reinforcement to Functionality. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 16169–16179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Erezuma, I.; Eufrasio-da-Silva, T.; Golafshan, N.; Deo, K.; Mishra, Y.K.; Castilho, M.; Gaharwar, A.K.; Leeuwenburgh, S.; Dolatshahi-Pirouz, A.; Orive, G. Nanoclay Reinforced Biomaterials for Mending Musculoskeletal Tissue Disorders. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Lagarón, J.M.; López-Rubio, A.; José Fabra, M. Bio-Based Packaging. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Aguilar, J.M.; Bengoechea, C.; Pérez, E.; Guerrero, A. Effect of Different Polyols as Plasticizers in Soy Based Bioplastics. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 153, 112522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Filip, D.G.; Surdu, V.A.; Paduraru, A.V.; Andronescu, E. Current Development in Biomaterials—Hydroxyapatite and Bioglass for Applications in Biomedical Field: A Review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Islam, M.S.; Nassar, M.; Elsayed, M.A.; Jameel, D.B.; Ahmad, T.T.; Rahman, M.M. In Vitro Optical and Physical Stability of Resin Composite Materials with Different Filler Characteristics. Polymers 2023, 15, 2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Gayathri, V.; Khan, T.; Gowtham, M.; Balan, R.; Sebaey, T.A. Functionalized Conductive Polymer Composites for Tissue Engineering and Biomedical Applications- a Mini Review. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2025, 13, 1533944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Yin, Z.; Jiang, Z.; Wu, T. The Development and Application of Contemporary Phosphorus Flame Retardants: A Review. Front. Mater. 2025, 12, 1508000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Guo, Y.; Kleemann, J.; Sijbesma, R.P.; Tomović, Ž. Phosphorus-Containing Polyisocyanurate Elastomers for Flame Retardant Application. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 4689–4697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Arnold, W.A.; Blum, A.; Branyan, J.; Bruton, T.A.; Carignan, C.C.; Cortopassi, G.; Datta, S.; Dewitt, J.; Doherty, A.C.; Halden, R.U.; et al. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: A Chemical Class of Emerging Concern. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 7645–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Kim, T.H.; Park, S.H.; Lee, S.; Bharadwaj, A.V.S.L.S.; Lee, Y.S.; Yoo, C.G.; Kim, T.H. A Review of Biomass-Derived UV-Shielding Materials for Bio-Composites. Energies 2023, 16, 2311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Costa, T.; Sampaio-Marques, B.; Neves, N.M.; Aguilar, H.; Fraga, A.G. Antimicrobial Properties of Hindered Amine Light Stabilizers in Polymer Coating Materials and Their Mechanism of Action. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1390513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Alegbe, E.O.; Uthman, T.O. A Review of History, Properties, Classification, Applications and Challenges of Natural and Synthetic Dyes. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Navarro-Segarra, M.; Tortosa, C.; Ruiz-Díez, C.; Desmaële, D.; Gea, T.; Barrena, R.; Sabaté, N.; Esquivel, J.P. A Plant-Like Battery: A Biodegradable Power Source Ecodesigned for Precision Agriculture. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 2900–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Huang, X.; Hou, H.; Yu, B.; Bai, J.; Guan, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, K.; Wang, X.; Sun, P.; Deng, Y.; et al. Fully Biodegradable and Long-Term Operational Primary Zinc Batteries as Power Sources for Electronic Medicine. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 5727–5739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chen, B.; Zhang, Z.; Xiao, M.; Wang, S.; Huang, S.; Han, D.; Meng, Y. Polymeric Binders Used in Lithium Ion Batteries: Actualities, Strategies and Trends. ChemElectroChem 2024, 11, e202400123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Huang, S.; Yang, D.; Zhang, W.; Qiu, X.; Li, Q.; Li, C. Dual-Templated Synthesis of Mesoporous Lignin-Derived Honeycomb-Like Porous Carbon/SiO2 Composites for High-Performance Li-Ion Battery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 317, 111004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lahtinen, P. Berry Extracts and Nanocellulose as Bioactive Skin Sprays and Surgical Dressings to Prevent the Growth of Dangerous Microbes|VTT Finland. VTT Research. 2024. Available online: https://www.vttresearch.com/en/news-and-ideas/berry-extracts-and-nanocellulose-bioactive-skin-sprays-and-surgical-dressings (accessed on 30 August 2024).
  183. Bioretec Ltd. Renewing Orthopedics, ActivTM. Bioretec. 2024. Available online: https://bioretec.com/products/activa (accessed on 30 August 2024).
  184. Emulate Inc. Culture of Innovation Leveraging Human Biology + Technology to Ignite a New Era in Human Health. Emulate Bio. 2025. Available online: https://emulatebio.com/about/ (accessed on 10 September 2024).
  185. Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.; Ma, L.; Zhang, J.; Xu, N.; Hu, K.; Duan, L. Integrated Micro/Nano Drug Delivery System Based on Magnetically Responsive Phase-Change Droplets for Ultrasound Theranostics. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024, 12, 1323056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Fouly, A.; Daoush, W.M.; Elqady, H.I.; Abdo, H.S. Fabrication of PMMA Nanocomposite Biomaterials Reinforced by Cellulose Nanocrystals Extracted from Rice Husk for Dental Applications. Friction 2024, 12, 2808–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. SmartReactors Inc. Cell Membrane: Mimicking the Human Lung. SmartReactors. 2025. Available online: https://www.smartreactors.com/cellmembrane (accessed on 13 September 2024).
  188. Synakis Corp. Innovative Biomaterial-Based Treatments for Ocular Injuries and Diseases. Synakis. 2024. Available online: https://www.ventureradar.com/organisation/Synakis/6667d61a-8eed-4f55-9b61-b60b62d6b543 (accessed on 13 September 2024).
  189. Lin, X.; Zhang, D.; Chen, X.; Liu, M. Self-Cross-Linked Oxidized Sodium Alginate/Gelatin/Halloysite Hydrogel as Injectable, Adhesive, Antibacterial Dressing for Hemostasis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 11444–11840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Wu, H.; Yang, L.; Luo, R.; Li, L.; Zheng, T.; Huang, K.; Qin, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y. A Drug-Free Cardiovascular Stent Functionalized with Tailored Collagen Supports In-Situ Healing of Vascular Tissues. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 11234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Ma, R.; Li, J.; Tyagi, R.D.; Zhang, X. Carbon dioxide and methane as carbon source for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates and concomitant carbon fixation. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 391, 129977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Dhivagar, R.; Suraparaju, S.K.; Atamurotov, F.; Kannan, K.G.; Opakhai, S.; Omara, A.A.M. Performance analysis of snail shell biomaterials in solar still for clean water production: Nature-inspired innovation for sustainability. Water Sci. Technol. 2024, 89, 3325–3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Vu, P.V.; Doan, T.D.; Tu, G.C.; Do, N.H.N.; Le, K.A.; Le, P.K. A novel application of cellulose aerogel composites from pineapple leaf fibers and cotton waste: Removal of dyes and oil in wastewater. J. Porous Mater. 2022, 29, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Ughetti, A.; Roncaglia, F.; Anderlini, B.; D’Eusanio, V.; Russo, A.L.; Forti, L. Integrated carbonate-based CO2 capture-biofixation through cyanobacteria. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Ghazvinian, A.; Gürsoy, B. Mycelium-based composite graded materials: Assessing the effects of time and substrate mixture on mechanical properties. Biomimetics 2022, 7, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Dong, Y.; Liu, B.; Lee, S.H.; Lum, W.C.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, H.; Zhou, B.; Zhang, J. Fabrication of rigid flame retardant foam using bio-based sucrose-furanic resin for building material applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 495, 153614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wachsmann, S.B.; Ruf, M.; Prinz, C.; Oehlsen, N.; Zhou, X.; Dyballa, M.; Arweiler, C.; Leistner, P.; Steeb, H.; Garrecht, H.; et al. Chitin/chitosan biocomposite foams with chitins from different organisms for sound absorption. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 11841–12269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Hahn, J. TômTex™: Leather Alternative Biomaterial from Seafood Shells and Coffee Grounds. Dezeen. 2020. Available online: https://www.dezeen.com/2020/08/22/tomtex-leather-alternative-biomaterial-seafood-shells-coffee/ (accessed on 11 October 2024).
  199. Ochoa, C.; Iszauk, E. Bringing Life to Materials to Replace Plastics and Leather. Extantia Capital Blog. 2025. Available online: https://medium.com/extantia-capital/bringing-life-to-materials-to-replace-plastics-and-leather-why-we-invested-in-modern-synthesis-cb4a2c022fe9 (accessed on 11 October 2024).
  200. MYCO WorkTM. Mushroom-Based ‘Leather’ Is Now a Scalable Alternative to Animal Leathers, Poised for Market Disruption. MycoWorks. 2025. Available online: https://www.mycoworks.com/mushroom-based-leather-is-now-a-scalable-alternative-to-animal-leathers-poised-for-market-disruption (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  201. Walker, K.T.; Keane, J.; Goosens, V.J.; Song, W.; Lee, K.Y.; Ellis, T. Self-pigmenting textiles grown from cellulose-producing bacteria with engineered tyrosinase expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 43, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Zhu, J.; Yan, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, X. A sustainable platform of lignin: From bioresources to materials and their applications in rechargeable batteries and supercapacitors. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 76, 100778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Deng, S.; Li, C.; Cao, J.; Cui, Z.; Du, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, P. Organ-on-a-chip meets artificial intelligence in drug evaluation. Theranostics 2023, 13, 4526–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Feng, C.; Deng, L.; Yong, Y.Y.; Wu, J.M.; Qin, D.L.; Yu, L.; Zhou, X.-G.; Wu, A.-G. The application of biomaterials in spinal cord injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Swansea University. ProColl: Characterisation of Recombinant Human Procollagen. Swansea University. 2024. Available online: https://www.swansea.ac.uk/medicine/enterprise-and-innovation/business-support-projects/accelerate-healthcare-technology-centre/procoll/ (accessed on 13 January 2025).
  206. ProColl. The Synthetic Biology Company Producing Best-in-Class Bovine and Animal-Free Collagen. ProColl. 2025. Available online: https://www.procoll.co.uk/ (accessed on 13 January 2025).
  207. Hasanpour, A.H.; Sepidarkish, M.; Mollalo, A.; Ardekani, A.; Almukhtar, M.; Mechaal, A.; Hosseini, S.R.; Bayani, M.; Javanian, M.; Rostami, A. The global prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in residents of elderly care centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2023, 12, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Mango Materials. The Future is Biodegradable. Mango Materials. 2025. Available online: https://www.mangomaterials.com/ (accessed on 18 January 2025).
  209. Vorländer, M. Auralization; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. European Parliament. The Impact of Textile Production and Waste on the Environment (Infographics). European Parliament. 2024. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20201208STO93327/the-impact-of-textile-production-and-waste-on-the-environment-infographics (accessed on 16 February 2025).
  211. Skoczinski, P.; Carus, M.; Tweddle, G.; Ruiz, P.; Hark, N.; Zhang, A.; de Guzman, D.; Ravenstijn, J.; Käb, H.; Raschka, A. Bio-Based Building Blocks and Polymers—Global Capacities, Production and Trends 2023–2028. Renewable Carbon. 2024. Available online: https://renewable-carbon.eu/publications/product/bio-based-building-blocks-and-polymers-global-capacities-production-and-trends-2023-2028/ (accessed on 23 February 2025).
  212. Resonant Link Medical. What Are Bioelectronic Devices and How Are They Fueling Healthcare Innovation. Resonant Link Medical. 2025. Available online: https://www.rlmedical.com/resource/bioelectronic-devices-fueling-healthcare-innovation (accessed on 26 February 2025).
  213. Wakefield, E. New Bioprinting Development May Lead to 3D Printed Human Organs. VoxelMatters. 2025. Available online: https://www.voxelmatters.com/new-bioprinting-development-may-lead-to-3d-printed-human-organs/ (accessed on 27 February 2025).
  214. Rana, M.M.; De la Hoz Siegler, H. Evolution of Hybrid Hydrogels: Next-Generation Biomaterials for Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering. Gels 2024, 10, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Oluwole, S.A.; Weldu, W.D.; Jayaraman, K.; Barnard, K.A.; Agatemor, C. Design Principles for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2024, 7, 8059–8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Negut, I.; Albu, C.; Bita, B. Advances in Antimicrobial Coatings for Preventing Infections of Head-Related Implantable Medical Devices. Coatings 2024, 14, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Abbasi, I. What Are Biodegradable Metallic Materials? AZoM. 2024. Available online: https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=23752 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  218. Weerarathna, I.N.; Kumar, P.; Dzoagbe, H.Y.; Kiwanuka, L. Advancements in Micro/Nanorobots in Medicine: Design, Actuation, and Transformative Application. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 11234–11246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Delgado-Pujol, E.J.; Martínez, G.; Casado-Jurado, D.; Vázquez, J.; León-Barberena, J.; Rodríguez-Lucena, D.; Torres, Y.; Alcudia, A.; Begines, B. Hydrogels and Nanogels: Pioneering the Future of Advanced Drug Delivery Systems. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Raheem, A. Advancements in 3D-Printed Biomaterials for Personalized Medicine: A Review. Prem. J. Sci. 2024, 4, 53. Available online: https://premierscience.com/pjs-24-282/ (accessed on 1 March 2025). [CrossRef]
  221. Park, J.E.; Kim, D.H. Advanced Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Therapeutic Applications. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2024, 13, 2304125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Bu, N.; Li, L.; Hu, X. Recent Trends in Natural Polymer-Based Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications. Biofunct. Mater. 2024, 2, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Hu, T.; Fang, J.; Shen, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, B.; Xu, Z.; Hu, W. Advances of Naturally Derived Biomedical Polymers in Tissue Engineering. Front. Chem. 2024, 12, 1469183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Barhoum, A.; Sadak, O.; Ramirez, I.A.; Iverson, N. Stimuli-Bioresponsive Hydrogels as New Generation Materials for Implantable, Wearable, and Disposable Biosensors for Medical Diagnostics: Principles, Opportunities, and Challenges. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2023, 317, 123–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Hong, Y.; Dai, G.; Xu, C.; Lee, W.-H. Biodegradable Elastic Hydrogels for Bioprinting. U.S. Patent US11884765B2, 13 December 2023. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Classification of natural-based materials [7,19,20,21,22] (created in https://BioRender.com).
Figure 1. Classification of natural-based materials [7,19,20,21,22] (created in https://BioRender.com).
Ijms 26 05518 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of cellulose.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of cellulose.
Ijms 26 05518 g002
Figure 3. Chemical structure of alginate.
Figure 3. Chemical structure of alginate.
Ijms 26 05518 g003
Figure 4. Chemical structure of chitin.
Figure 4. Chemical structure of chitin.
Ijms 26 05518 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structure of chitosan.
Figure 5. Chemical structure of chitosan.
Ijms 26 05518 g005
Figure 6. Chemical structure of gellan gum.
Figure 6. Chemical structure of gellan gum.
Ijms 26 05518 g006
Figure 7. Chemical structure of starch.
Figure 7. Chemical structure of starch.
Ijms 26 05518 g007
Figure 8. Chemical structure of dextran.
Figure 8. Chemical structure of dextran.
Ijms 26 05518 g008
Figure 9. Chemical structure of pullulan.
Figure 9. Chemical structure of pullulan.
Ijms 26 05518 g009
Figure 10. Chemical structure of agarose.
Figure 10. Chemical structure of agarose.
Ijms 26 05518 g010
Figure 11. Chemical structure of collagen.
Figure 11. Chemical structure of collagen.
Ijms 26 05518 g011
Figure 12. Chemical structure of gelatin.
Figure 12. Chemical structure of gelatin.
Ijms 26 05518 g012
Figure 13. Chemical structure of silk.
Figure 13. Chemical structure of silk.
Ijms 26 05518 g013
Figure 14. Chemical structure of fibrin.
Figure 14. Chemical structure of fibrin.
Ijms 26 05518 g014
Figure 15. Chemical structure of elastin.
Figure 15. Chemical structure of elastin.
Ijms 26 05518 g015
Figure 16. Chemical structure of polyisoprene.
Figure 16. Chemical structure of polyisoprene.
Ijms 26 05518 g016
Figure 17. Chemical structure of rosin.
Figure 17. Chemical structure of rosin.
Ijms 26 05518 g017
Figure 18. Chemical structure of hyaluronic acid.
Figure 18. Chemical structure of hyaluronic acid.
Ijms 26 05518 g018
Figure 19. Applications of biomaterials in various sectors (created in https://www.canva.com/).
Figure 19. Applications of biomaterials in various sectors (created in https://www.canva.com/).
Ijms 26 05518 g019
Figure 20. Observed biomaterial trends [218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225] (Created in BioRender. Amponsah, O. (2025) https://BioRender.com).
Figure 20. Observed biomaterial trends [218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225] (Created in BioRender. Amponsah, O. (2025) https://BioRender.com).
Ijms 26 05518 g020
Table 1. Some common functional additives for enhancing biomaterial performance.
Table 1. Some common functional additives for enhancing biomaterial performance.
Additive TypeExamplesSpecific RoleOutcomeReference
CrosslinkersGlutaraldehyde
Genipin
Epichlorohydrin
1,4-Butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE)
N,N′-methylenebisacrylamide
Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate
Poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylates
Formation of chemical or covalent bonds between polymer chains to enhance stability and mechanical strength.Enhance structural integrity, tunable degradation rates, reduce rapid turnover. Toxicity concerns with synthetic crosslinkers.[162,163]
Bioactive moleculesPolynucleotides (PN)
Mannitol
Growth factors
Antimicrobial peptides
Retinol
Ascorbic acid
Ferulic acid
Stimulate biological responses such as antioxidation, infection control, drug release, etc.Enhanced tissue regeneration, antioxidative protection, infection control, vascularization, and prolonged biomaterial life.[164]
Reinforcing agentsNanocellulose
Nanoclay
Nanoparticles
Increase mechanical strength, stiffness, surface area, biocompatibility,
water retention.
Improved load-bearing capacity, stress resistance, hydrophilicity, and durability.[165,166]
PlasticizersGlycerol, ethylene glycol (EG)
Diethylene glycol (DEG)
Triethylene glycol (TEG)
Triethanolamine (TEA)
Sorbitol
Reduce brittleness and increase flexibility.Enhanced elasticity,
processability, mechanical and barrier properties.
[167,168]
FillersHydroxyapatite (HA)
Tricalcium phosphate (TPA)
Bioactive glass
Silica nanoparticles
Modify texture,
mechanical properties,
and bioactivity.
Increased hardness, density, compressibility, osteoconductivity, and bioactivity. HA improves bone metabolism and has antibacterial effects.[169,170]
Conductive agentsPolypyrrole
Polyaniline
Polythiophene
Graphene oxide
Carbon black
Impart electrical conductivity into the material.Enable stimulus-responsive behavior and biosensing applications.[171]
Flame retardantsPhosphates
(e.g., Diethyl(hydroxymethyl)phosphonate and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP))
Halogenated compounds
(Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs))
Improve thermal stability and reduce flammability.Enhance processing and application safety for wearable sensors and textiles.[172,173]
Antistatic agentsQuaternary ammonium compounds
(benzylalkyldimethyl ammonium compounds (BACs),
Alkyltrimethyl ammonium compounds (ATMACs)
Dialkyldimethyl ammonium compounds (DADMACs))
Reduce static charge accumulation in biomaterials.Enhance handling and comfort in wearable applications.[174]
UV stabilizersHindered amine light stabilizers (HALS)
Benzophenone derivatives
(Benzophenone-3 (BP-3),
Benzophenone-12 (BP-12))
Benzophenones absorb harmful UV light and dissipate as harmless thermal energy. HALS functions by scavenging free radicals.Prolonged material lifespan and stability under sunlight exposure.[175,176]
ColorantsNatural dyes
(anthocyanins, Indigofera tinctoria, Rubia tinctorum, Curcuma longa, Lawsonia inermis, Haematoxylum campechianum, etc.)
Synthetic dyes
(Tartrazine (E102), Indigo Carmine (E132), Allura Red (E129), Sunset Yellow (E110), etc.)
Provides aesthetic appeal and visualization.Improved product appearance and visualization.[177]
Table 2. Table showing some innovative applications of biomaterials.
Table 2. Table showing some innovative applications of biomaterials.
SectorBiomaterial TypeInnovationReference
EnergyCelluloseA plant-like battery, also called a biodegradable battery.[178]
Gelatin hydrogelBiodegradable primary zinc–molybdenum (Zn−Mo) battery with gelatin hydrogel electrolyte.[179]
Algal biopolymersUsage as electrodes, binders, electrolytes, and separators in batteries (green battery cycle—LixC6 and LiFePO4).[180]
Lignin-derived carbonMesoporous lignin-derived honeycomb-like porous carbon/SiO2 composites for high-performance Li-ion battery.[181]
MedicineWild berry extract and nanocelluloseAntimicrobial skin sprays and surgical dressings.[182]
Poly L-lactide-co-glycolide copolymer (PLGA)Production of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA) for the synthesis of bioabsorbable implants applied in orthopedics, cardiovascular interventions, and tissue engineering to provide temporary support while facilitating tissue regeneration.[183]
Collagen, fibrin, and glycoproteinsIntegrated into the development of organs-on-chips (OoCs), which have great implications for drug testing, screening, disease modeling, and personalized medicine.[184]
Lipids-based membrane shellsIntegrated micro-/nano-drug delivery system based on magnetically responsive phase-change droplets for ultrasound theranostics.[185]
Cellulose nanocrystals from rice husksReinforced polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) nanocomposites for dental application.[186]
NanocelluloseNanocellulose membrane that propels artificial lung devices.[187]
HyaluronanAdvanced hydrogel designed for precise ocular delivery.[188]
Alginate and gelatinOxidized sodium alginate/gelatin/halloysite hydrogel used as an injectable, adhesive, and antibacterial dressing for hemostasis.[189]
CollagenFormulation of drug-free coating functionalized with tailored collagen supports for vascular tissue healing.[190]
EnvironmentPolyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from methanogensConcurrent carbon capture (CO2 and CH4) and utilization by methanogens for PHA production.[191]
Snail shellsSnail shell biomaterials in solar still for clean water production.[192]
CelluloseCellulose from pineapple leaf fibers and cotton waste are used in making aerogel composites for the removal of dyes and oil in wastewater.[193]
Microalgae biomassIntegrated carbonate-based carbon capture and algae biofixation systems.[194]
ConstructionMycelium based composite (MBC)MBC as load-bearing masonry components in construction.[195]
SucroseRigid flame-retardant foam as a building material synthesized from bio-based sucrose–furanic resin.[196]
Chitin and chitosanChitin/chitosan composite foam for sound absorption.[197]
TextileChitosan from mushroom and shrimp shells; bacterial cellulose; myceliumAnimal and petrochemical-free biotextiles as an alternative to conventional leather and textiles.[198,199,200]
Melanated bacterial cellulose from genetically engineered Komagataeibacter rhaeticusUsed as a self-pigmented biotextile.[201]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amponsah, O.; Nopuo, P.S.A.; Manga, F.A.; Catli, N.B.; Labus, K. Future-Oriented Biomaterials Based on Natural Polymer Resources: Characteristics, Application Innovations, and Development Trends. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125518

AMA Style

Amponsah O, Nopuo PSA, Manga FA, Catli NB, Labus K. Future-Oriented Biomaterials Based on Natural Polymer Resources: Characteristics, Application Innovations, and Development Trends. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(12):5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125518

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amponsah, Oscar, Prince Sungdewie Adama Nopuo, Felista Adrehem Manga, Nicole Bianca Catli, and Karolina Labus. 2025. "Future-Oriented Biomaterials Based on Natural Polymer Resources: Characteristics, Application Innovations, and Development Trends" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 12: 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125518

APA Style

Amponsah, O., Nopuo, P. S. A., Manga, F. A., Catli, N. B., & Labus, K. (2025). Future-Oriented Biomaterials Based on Natural Polymer Resources: Characteristics, Application Innovations, and Development Trends. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(12), 5518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125518

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop