Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Metabolic Pathways Between Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) and Sarcopenia
Previous Article in Journal
Ammonia Synthesis over Transition Metal Catalysts: Reaction Mechanisms, Rate-Determining Steps, and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

First-Principles Investigation of Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 Nanostructures

1
Laboratory of Materials, Organization and Properties (LMOP), Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
2
General Directorate of Technological Studies, Higher Institute of Technological Studies in Communications of Tunis (El Ghazala), Ariana 2083, Tunisia
3
College of Computing, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Lot 660, Hay Moulay Rachid, Ben Guérir 43150, Morocco
4
Laboratory of Condensed Matter and Interdisciplinary Sciences (LaMCScI), Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10112, Morocco
5
Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, Institut Neel, 38000 Grenoble, France
6
Electrical and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(10), 4671; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104671
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 28 April 2025 / Accepted: 7 May 2025 / Published: 14 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Science)

Abstract

The structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) and Bi2Fe4O9 nanostructures were investigated using Density Functional Theory (DFT) within the Generalized Gradient Approximation (PBE-GGA) plus U approach. The PBE-GGA + U calculations predict band gaps of 2.4 eV for BiFeO3 and 2.3 eV for Bi2Fe4O9, closely aligning with experimental data. The analysis of partial and total density of states reveals strong hybridization between iron 3d and oxygen 2p states, with a significant contribution from Fe 3d orbitals in both structures. Additionally, nanostructure and crystal symmetry are crucial in influencing the magnetic properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. Our calculations indicate that the antiferromagnetic phase is energetically more favorable than the ferromagnetic phase in both materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Research on environmentally friendly energy sources has gained significant momentum in recent years. Solar-driven water splitting (WS) into H2 and oxygen (O2) using multiferroic materials as photocatalysts is considered a promising and innovative approach for hydrogen production and clean water purification.
Multiferroic materials exhibit interconnected electric, magnetic, and structural order parameters, leading to simultaneous ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and ferroelastic states [1]. Bismuth ferrites such as BiFeO3 (BFO) and Bi2Fe4O9 are promising photocatalyst candidates. For BiFeO3, which exhibits an antiferromagnetic (AFM) spin arrangement, the Néel temperature (TN) is approximately 643 K, and the Curie temperature (Tc) is around 1100 K [2]. Meanwhile, Bi2Fe4O9 exhibits ferroelectric behavior with Curie and Néel temperatures of approximately 250 K and 265 K, respectively [3].
The unique multiferroic properties of bismuth ferrites have attracted significant interest for potential applications in innovative magnetoelectric and photovoltaic devices [4]. Recently, extensive efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of bismuth ferrite for applications such as wastewater degradation [5].
Numerous theoretical and experimental investigations have been conducted to enhance the electrical and magnetic properties of bismuth ferrites [6,7,8]. Petkov et al. [9] demonstrated that BiFeO3 nanoparticles retain a polar rhombohedral structure, exhibit ferromagnetism, and show enhanced magnetoelectric coupling. Using first-principles calculations, Campetella et al. [10] reported that suspended stoichiometric BiFeO3 flakes in the two-dimensional limit exhibit enhanced tetragonality and large dipole moments per unit surface. Additionally, density functional calculations, including GGA + U approximation, have been employed to study the influence of intrinsic vacancies on the electronic structure, magnetism, and dielectric functions of BiFeO3, revealing significant impacts on the total density of states and magnetic behavior [11]. The electronic structure of BiFeO3 in ferroelectric and paraelectric phases points out the presence of covalent bonding contribution, with a band gap of 1.198 eV and 0.280 eV, respectively [12].
In previous experimental work, we demonstrated that varying the annealing time results in distinct morphologies of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. BiFeO3 nanoparticles with sizes below 10 nm and plate-like particles with dimensions of 100–200 nm (thickness of 30 nm) were successfully synthesized [13]. Studies have shown that morphology strongly influences the physical properties of these materials. Theoretical simulations have been employed to investigate electronic structures and magnetic properties. For instance, Sahoo et al. studied the magnetic behavior of Bi2Fe4O9 nanoparticles and found that coercivity, Neel temperature, and remanent magnetization depend strongly on particle shape, with sphere-like nanoparticles exhibiting a dominating antiferromagnetic component [14].
Despite extensive studies on BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9, research on the relationship between morphology and theoretical properties remains limited.
Our previous work with Mössbauer spectroscopy reveals an asymmetry in the Fe3+-sextet spectrum for BiFeO3, indicating that the spin cycloid (bulk period of 62 nm) persists in nanoparticles significantly smaller than this threshold [15]. However, due to magnetic anisotropy induced by magnetoelastic and surface-confinement effects, the cycloid becomes unstable under a magnetic field of 0.2 T, transitioning into a homogenous antiferromagnetic state. More interestingly, increasing the external magnetic field up to 8 T results in multiple Mössbauer sextets attributed to a flexomagnetic effect due to strain gradients across the particle. The impact of the size of BFO micro-crystallites on the Mössbauer and magnetic properties has been examined and discussed in previous work [15]. Macroscopic magnetic measurements and in situ Mössbauer spectrometry were combined as a local probe of magnetization to investigate the magnetic response and stability of the synthesized BFO nanostructures. We demonstrated that the variation in the Mössbauer spectrum with temperature reflects the magnetic properties and arrangement of iron ions, and the transition to a magnetically split spectrum at 77 K indicates the initiation of magnetic ordering in the material. This study focused on the characterization of BiFeO3 nanoparticles and Bi2Fe4O9 synthesized via the hydrothermal method, enabling control over particle size, shape, and uniformity. Previous investigations involved X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and UV–vis spectroscopy to characterize the obtained samples [13].
Although considerable experimental data on BFO ferrites exist, combined experimental and theoretical research investigations remain limited. The fundamental mechanisms governing the functional response, phase transformation, and magnetoelectric coupling in BFO have yet to be fully elucidated. In the present study, we employed Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations based on the exchange correlation functional within the LDA + U approximation to explore structural phase transformations and magnetic and optical behavior.
The integration of experimental findings with Quantum ESPRESSO simulations offers a valuable approach to better understanding the surface stability, electronic properties, and magnetic behavior of bismuth ferrites. However, accurately capturing the complexities of these materials remains a challenge [16,17].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural Properties

At ambient conditions, BiFeO3 crystallizes in a rhombohedral distorted perovskite structure (R3c space group), as illustrated in Figure 1a, whereas Bi2Fe4O9, adopts an orthorhombic structure (Pbam space group), as shown in Figure 1b. The optimized lattice parameters of these systems are presented in Table 1. Fe and O in the crystal structure, which is made up of a F e 4 + O 6 2 octahedral and F e 3 + O 4 2 tetrahedral. Fe, Bi, and O atoms have the following valence states: Fe (3p63d64s2), Bi (5d106s26p3) and O (2s22p4). The band structures of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 are calculated along high-symmetry directions (F–Γ–L–Γ–Z) and (X–Γ–Z–Y–Γ), respectively, in the Brillouin zones (refer to Figure 1c,d for notation).
To investigate the structural features of bismuth ferrite (Figure 1), we first optimize the crystalline structures of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 (Table 1). The structural optimization was carried out using a magnetic structure to find the optimal lattice parameters that correspond to the system at an equilibrium state. As can be noted in Table 1, the estimated lattice parameters are close to the previous study [13,18,19]. In addition, our calculations conclude that the antiferromagnetic phase is more stable than the ferromagnetic one in both structures of BFO.
Table 1. Lattice parameters and bandgap energy Eg values of the bismuth ferrite system calculated using PBE-GGA + U approximation.
Table 1. Lattice parameters and bandgap energy Eg values of the bismuth ferrite system calculated using PBE-GGA + U approximation.
This Work Experimental
Result [13]
Literature
BiFeO3
a = b = c (Å)5.6360(1)5.5827(2)5.59–5.69 [18,20,21,22]
α   ( ° ) 59.28 6059–60 [20,21,22,23]
Eg (eV)2.42.21–2.7 [20,21,23,24]
Bi2Fe4O9
a (Å)7.9740(1)7.9431(4)7.905–7.96 [19,25]
b(Å)8.4240(1)8.5276(2)8.428–8.44 [19,25]
c (Å)5.8670(1)6.0291(2)5.99–6.005 [19,25]
α   ( ° ) 909090 [19,25]
Eg (eV)2.32.341–2.4 [19,25,26]

2.2. Electronic Properties

The total and partial density of state (T/PDOS) and band structure of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 were evaluated using PBE-GGA and PBE-GGA + U approximations.
For BiFeO3, the density of states is shown in Figure 2a and Figure 3a. As observed, the 3d states of iron with red color are responsible for most of the density of the state. The BiFeO3 material distortions allow the F e 4 + to move along the octahedron axis. Furthermore, as can be seen in Figure 2a and Figure 3a, the density of states resulting from the 6p and 2p states of bismuth and oxygen, respectively, exhibit a significant value. Furthermore, a small density of states value is seen in the (4s) and (6s and 6p) and (2s) states of iron, bismuth, and oxygen, respectively, according to the density of states in Figure 2b and Figure 3b. The Fe-O band is determined by the chemical environment and the hybridization of the iron 3d and oxygen 2p states. The DOS of the Fe element takes place near the Fermi level, with the 3d orbital accounting for a considerable fraction. The 3d-Fe states exhibit polarization, pointing to a semiconductor behavior for BiFeO3. Shen et al. [12] reported that the analysis of the electronic structures of BiFeO3 in ferroelectric and paraelectric phases indicates that the O-2p electrons hybridize with Bi-6p and Fe-3d electrons, which suggests the presence of covalent bonding contribution in BiFeO3. Moreover, the calculated value of the band gap using PBE-GGA approximation, as shown in Figure 2c, is about 1 eV. However, experimental data [13] indicate a band gap value of about 2.4 eV. As a result, these orbitals 3d of iron, using GGA + U correction with the values for U = 4 eV, demonstrate that 3d is at 1.5 eV with a band gap of 2.4 eV (as shown in Figure 3c and Table 1), which is consistent with that reported in another work [20,21,23,27].
For the second structure, Bi2Fe4O9 presented in Figure 1b, the distortion in the Bi2Fe4O9 material allows for the movement of F e 3 + along the tetrahedral axis and F e 4 + along the octahedron axis. The electronic structure of Bi2Fe4O9 can be obtained from its total and partial density of states (T/PDOS) and band structure, as shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5 for GGA and GGA + U, respectively. Also, the Bi2Fe4O9 exhibits a semiconductor character. The density of states shows the hybridization of the iron 3d and oxygen 2p states with a large contribution due to the 3d orbitals of iron atoms. Figure 4c and Figure 5c depict the computed band structure in the highly symmetric directions in the first Brillouin zone. Bi2Fe4O9 is a semiconductor with a band gap value at the Γ point around 1 eV and 2.3 eV using GGA and GGA + U, respectively [26]. So, the calculations confirm that both materials exhibit semiconductor behavior, with Fe 3d and O 2p hybridization significantly influencing electronic structure.

2.3. Magnetic Structure and Magnetic Anisotropy

Magnetic properties of bismuth ferrite are primarily due to the polarization of Fe ions. The values of the induced magnetic moments at atomic sites depend on their local environments. This is clearly shown in our case, in which an F e 4 + O 6 2 octahedral formed between oxygen and iron ions in the BiFeO3 structure gives a magnetic moment value of Fe atoms of about 3.81 µ B , as shown in Table 2. However, in the Bi2Fe4O9 structure, the oxygen and iron ions formed an F e 4 + O 6 2 octahedral and an F e 3 + O 4 2 tetrahedral, which give a magnetic moment values of Fe atoms of around 3.67 µ B and 3.78 µ B , respectively.
In agreement with experimental data, we proved in previous work, for Bi2Fe4O9, the data were fitted with two paramagnetic components, unambiguously corresponding to ferric species in tetrahedral and octahedral units [30].
Magnetic anisotropy in magnetic materials results from spin–orbit coupling. This permits orbitals to align themselves with one or more crystallographic axes, resulting in an easy magnetization direction. The magnetic anisotropy energy is typically determined by the symmetry of the crystalline structure, spin–orbit effects, and exchange interactions between magnetic moments. In fact, magnetic anisotropy is caused by the combined contributions of all these processes. We calculate the magnetic anisotropy energy for each direction, and the lowest absolute values correspond to the a-axis for BiFeO3. The results reveal that the a-axis corresponds to an easy magnetization direction for BiFeO3 crystal; the magnetic anisotropy value is ( = 32   m e V ) , in agreement with the experimental data [31]. Indeed, we demonstrated in previous work that as a consequence of a flexomagnetic effect arising from strain gradients due to a continuous variation in the coupling between magnetization and the structural distortion from the surface to the particle core [15].
This direction is favored due to the strong spin–orbit coupling and the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in the material, which influences its multiferroic properties, including its magnetic behavior. In addition to strain effects, magnetic interactions are also altered at the surface due to reduced symmetry, giving rise to surface magnetic anisotropy. Recent calculations [32] have demonstrated that this anisotropy depends on the orientation of the surface normal relative to the cycloid propagation vector, leading to distinct “proximity” and “edge” effects. However, for Bi2Fe4O9 material, the results reveal that the b-axis corresponds to an easy magnetization direction with the magnetic anisotropy value ( = 7.9045   m e V ) . As the particle size decreases, the surface effect and anisotropy increase, eventually leading the particles to enter the multi-domain region. We illustrated in a previous experimental study that the increase in magnetization can be attributed to the increase in the surface-to-volume ratio resulting from the reduction in particle size. This increase leads to a total dipole moment induced by the canted, irregular, and non-collinear spin order within the material [30].
The calculated density of states shows significant hybridization between Fe-3d states and O-2p states along with minor overlap between Bi-6p and O-2p states. The magnetic properties of Bi2Fe4O9 are primarily due to Fe3+ ions, each of which has a non-integer magnetic moment of approximately 3.9 µ B . The values of the induced magnetic moments at other atomic sites depend on their local environments [26]. Verseils et al. claimed that the crystal structure of Bi2Fe4O9 influences its magnetic properties through spin-lattice coupling, as evidenced by anomalous softening of phonon modes in the antiferromagnetic phase [33]. The magnetic properties exhibit a combination of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic, with the potential for unusual magnetic phase transitions [34].

3. Materials and Methods

First-principles calculations based on a DFT method were employed to investigate the ground state nature of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. The calculations were performed using the plane-wave (PW) pseudopotential method implemented in the Quantum ESPRESSO code [35]. Exchange and correlation effects were accounted for using a Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE)-Generalized Gradient Approximation (PBE-GGA) [36]. To correct the band gap values, the GGA + U approach, with U = 4 eV, was used. This correction adds an on-site Coulomb interaction term (GGA + U) to describe localized electron interactions more accurately [37]. The plane-wave cutoff energy was set to 70 Ry; it was selected after careful convergence testing to ensure a good balance between computational efficiency and the accuracy of total energy, forces, and electronic structure, and a Monkhorst–Pack k-point grid of 10 × 10 × 10 was used to sample the Brillouin zones. The convergence criterion was set at 10 5 eV.

4. Conclusions

This study highlights the strong correlation between nanostructure, crystal symmetry, and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. The calculations were performed at two levels of theory, namely DFT and DFT + U. The exchange-correlation (xc) functionals PBE and PBE + U with GGA pseudopotentials have been tested to compute diverse properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. While all the exchange-correlation functionals accurately capture the structural properties, they fall short in accurately predicting their band structure. The introduction of the DFT + U method improves the calculated band structure. Specifically, PBE-GGA + U calculations predict a bandgap of 2.4 eV for BiFeO3 and 2.3 eV for Bi2Fe4O9, in accordance with our experimental results [20,21,23]. Nanoscale morphology and crystal structure strongly influence the magnetic properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 related compounds. The results revealed that the a-axis corresponds to an easy magnetization direction for BiFeO3 crystal, and the b-axis corresponds to an easy magnetization direction for Bi2Fe4O9. The calculations can be used to infer that the nanostructuring effects and crystal structure strongly influence the magnetic properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. It is important to report that the results of different magnetic configurations proved the hypothesis that nanostructuring significantly impacts the magnetic behavior and structural properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9. It shows that the antiferromagnetic phase is more stable than the ferromagnetic one in both materials. Magnetic anisotropy energy calculations indicate that BiFeO3 favors magnetization along the a-axis, whereas Bi2Fe4O9 prefers the b-axis.
The findings provide insights into the fundamental mechanisms governing multiferroic behavior, opening new possibilities for applications in electronic and magnetoelectric devices.

Author Contributions

I.M.-Z.: Conceptualization, analysis, and writing original draft, Y.K.: Quantum Espresso study, review & editing, W.B.T.: discussion of the results of the manuscript. O.M.: discussion of the results and supervision. E.-K.H.: discussion of the results. N.T.M.: discussion of the results, reviewing and supervision. A.E.M.: reviewing and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support by the «Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique», «Laboratoire LR99ES17», «PRF2019-D4P2», «PHC-Utique 21G1408», «Tuniso-Marocain 20/R&D23», and «20PEJC 01-10» projects.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Tokunaga, M.; Akaki, M.; Ito, T.; Miyahara, S.; Miyake, A.; Kuwahara, H.; Furukawa, N. Magnetic control of transverse electric polarization in BiFeO3. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 5878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fischer, P.; Polomska, M.; Sosnowska, I.; Szymanski, M.M. Temperature dependence of the crystal and magnetic structures of BiFeO3. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1980, 13, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kirsch, A.; Murshed, M.M.; Gaczynski, P.; Becker, K.-D.; Gesing, T.M. Bi2Fe4O9: Structural changes from nano- to micro-crystalline state. Z. Für Naturforschung B 2016, 71, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vopson, M.M. Fundamentals of Multiferroic Materials and Their Possible Applications. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2015, 40, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Othman, M.; Mallek-Zouari, I.; Akrout, H.; Thabet-Mliki, N. Synthesis and properties of ultra-small BiFeO3 nanoparticles doped with cobalt. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 10580–10587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, K.; Fan, H.; Ren, P.; Yang, C. Structural, electronic and optical properties of BiFeO3 studied by first-principles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 1901–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lavasani, S.; Mirzaee, O.; Shokrollahi, H.; Moghadam, A.; Salami, M. Magnetic and morphological characterization of Bi2Fe4O9 nanoparticles synthesized via a new reverse chemical co-precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 12120–12125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lejman, M.; Paillard, C.; Juvé, V.; Vaudel, G.; Guiblin, N.; Bellaiche, L.; Viret, M.; Gusev, V.E.; Dkhil, B.; Ruello, P. Magnetoelastic and magnetoelectric couplings across the antiferromagnetic transition in multiferroic BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2019, 99, 104103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Petkov, V.; Shastri, S. Lattice symmetry breaking transition and critical size Lattice symmetry breaking transition and critical size limit for ferroic orders in nanophase BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 054121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Campetella, M.; Calandra, M. Polar magnetic metallic state in few-layer BiFeO3. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 104, 174111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, R.-P.; Lin, S.-X.; Fang, X.-G.; Liu, J.-M. Electronic and magnetic properties of BiFeO3 with intrinsic defects: First-principles prediction. Chin. Phys. B 2014, 23, 067102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shen, T.; Hu, C.; Dai, H.L.; Yang, W.L.; Liu, H.C.; Wei, X.L. First principles study of structural, electronic, and optical properties of BiFeO3 in ferroelectric and paraelectric phases. Mater. Res. Innov. 2015, 19, S5-684–S5-688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ben Taazayet, W.; Zouari, I.M.; Hosni, N.; Dkhil, B.; Mliki, N.T. Facile synthesis of pure BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 2518–2533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sahoo, A.; Bhattacharya, D.; Das, M.; Mandal, P. Mandal Shape dependent multiferroic behavior in Bi2Fe4O9 nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mallek-Zouari, I.; Taazayet, W.B.; Grenèche, J.-M.; Bessais, L.; Dkhil, B.; Mliki, N. Field-induced spin cycloidal modulation to antiferromagnetic transition and possible flexomagnetic effect in BiFeO3 nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 934, 167944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Trujillo, D.; Ghosh, A.; Nakhmanson, S.M.; Alpay, S.P. Surface structure and energetics of low index facets of bismuth ferrite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 16400–16406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Burns, S.R.; Paull, O.; Juraszek, J.; Sando, D. The Experimentalist’s Guide to the Cycloid, or Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism in Epitaxial BiFeO3. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 2003711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ivanov, S.A.; Nordblad, P.; Tellgren, R.; Ericsson, T.; Korchagina, S.K.; Rybakova, L.F.; Hewat, A. Influence of PbZrO3 doping on the structural and magnetic properties of BiFeO3. Solid State Sci. 2008, 10, 1875–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nobukazu, N.; Masatada, W. The crystal structures of Bi2Mn4O10, Bi2Al4O9 and Bi2Fe4O9. Z. Krist. Cryst. Mater. 1968, 127, 173–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grover, S.; Butler, K.T.; Waghmare, U.V.; Grau-Crespo, R. Co Substituted BiFeO3: Electronic, Ferroelectric, and Thermodynamic Properties from First Principles. Adv. Theory Simul. 2023, 6, 2200673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goffinet, M.; Hermet, P.; Bilc, D.I.; Ghosez, P. Hybrid functional study of prototypical multiferroic bismuth ferrite. Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 014403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ricinschi, D.; Yun, K.-Y.; Okuyama, M. A mechanism for the 150 μC cm−2 polarization of BiFeO3 films based on first principles calculations and new structural data. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, L97–L105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Srihari, N.V.; Nayak, S.; Poornesh, P.; Nagaraja, K.K. Variation in the electronic, mechanical, and structural properties among the polymorphs of bismuth ferrite: A first-principles approach. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2023, 138, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Youssef, M.B.; Saitzek, S.; Rajput, N.S.; El Marssia, M.; Jouiad, M. Effect of Sr and Ti substitutions on optical and photocatalytic properties of Bi1−xSrxFe1−xTixO3 nanomaterials. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Q.Q.; Gong, W.; Wang, J.; Ning, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Ren, W.; Zhang, Z. Size-Dependent Magnetic, Photoabsorbing, and Photocatalytic Properties of Single-Crystalline Bi2Fe4O9 Semiconductor Nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 25241–25246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Irshad, Z.; Shah, S.H.; Rafiq, M.A.; Hasan, M.M. First principles study of structural, electronic and magnetic properties of ferromagnetic Bi2Fe4O9. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 624, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kozakov, A.T.; Guglev, K.A.; Ilyasov, V.V.; Ershov, I.V.; Nikol’skii, A.V.; Smotrakov, V.G.; Eremkin, V.V. Electronic Structure of Bismuth Ferrite and Hematite Single Crystals: X-Ray Photoelectron Study and Calculation. Phys. Solid State 2011, 53, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Farid, G.; Murtaza, G.; Flemban, T.H.; Althib, H.; AlObaid, A.A.; Al-Muhimeed, T.I.; Mera, A.; Haq, B.U.; Mahmood, Q. Structural, Magnetic, and Dielectric Properties of Sn-Doped BiFeO3: Experiment and DFT Analysis. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2021, 34, 2179–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shamir, N.; Gurewitz, E.; Shaked, H. The Magnetic Structure of Bi2Fe4O9—Analysis of Neutron Diffraction Measurements. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 1978, 34, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mallek-Zouari, I.; Ben Taazayet, W.; Grenèche, J.-M.; Bessais, L.; Mliki, N.T. Mössbauer spectrometry for investigating the magnetic properties of Bi2Fe4O9 bismuth ferrite nanostructures. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025, 332, 130266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kawachi, S.; Miyake, A.; Ito, T.; Dissanayake, S.E.; Matsuda, M.; Ratcliff, W.; Xu, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Miyahara, S.; Furukawa, N.; et al. Successive field-induced transitions in BiFeO3 around room temperature. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2017, 1, 024408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Allen, M.; Aupiais, I.; Cazayous, M.; de Sousa, R. Size-dependent bistability in multiferroic nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 084402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Verseils, M.; Litvinchuk, A.P.; Brubach, J.-B.; Roy, P.; Beauvois, K.; Ressouche, E.; Skumryev, V.; Gospodinov, M.; Simonet, V.; de Brion, S. Infrared phonon spectroscopy on the Cairo pentagonal antiferromagnet Bi2Fe4O9: A study through the pressure-induced structural transition. Phys. Rev. B 2021, 103, 174403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Da Silva, K.L.; Trautwein, R.S.; Da Silva, R.B.; Fabián, M.; Čižmár, E.; Holub, M.; Skurikhina, O.; Harničárová, M.; Girman, V.; Menzel, D.; et al. Suppression of the Cycloidal Spin Arrangement in BiFeO3 Caused by the Mechanically Induced Structural Distortion and Its Effect on Magnetism. Front. Mater. 2021, 8, 717185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Giannozzi, P.; Baseggio, O.; Bonfà, P.; Brunato, D.; Car, R.; Carnimeo, I.; Cavazzoni, C.; Gironcoli, S.D.; Delugas, P.; Ruffino, F.F.; et al. Quantum ESPRESSO toward the exascale. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 152, 154105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perdew, J.P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kaczkowski, J.; Pugaczowa-Michalska, M.; Płowaś-Korus, I. Comparative density functional studies of pristine and doped bismuth ferrite polymorphs by GGA+U and meta-GGA SCAN+U. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crystal structures of (a) perovskite-type BiFeO3 in space group R3c, (b) mullite-type Bi2Fe4O9 in space group Pbam, and (c,d) Brillouin zones of the BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 structures, respectively, with the high symmetry points marked with green lines.
Figure 1. Crystal structures of (a) perovskite-type BiFeO3 in space group R3c, (b) mullite-type Bi2Fe4O9 in space group Pbam, and (c,d) Brillouin zones of the BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 structures, respectively, with the high symmetry points marked with green lines.
Ijms 26 04671 g001
Figure 2. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of BiFeO3 calculated using PBE-GGA approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA approximation.
Figure 2. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of BiFeO3 calculated using PBE-GGA approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA approximation.
Ijms 26 04671 g002
Figure 3. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of BiFeO3 calculated using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation.
Figure 3. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of BiFeO3 calculated using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation.
Ijms 26 04671 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of Bi2Fe4O9 calculated using PBE-GGA approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA approximation.
Figure 4. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of Bi2Fe4O9 calculated using PBE-GGA approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA approximation.
Ijms 26 04671 g004
Figure 5. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of Bi2Fe4O9 calculated using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation.
Figure 5. (a,b) Total and partial spin-resolved densities of states of Bi2Fe4O9 calculated using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation. (Fe (d), Fe (p), and Fe (s) denote the 3d, 3p, and 4s orbitals of iron, respectively, while Bi (p) and Bi (s) represent the 6p and 6s orbitals of bismuth, respectively, and O (p) and O (s) signify the 2p and 2s orbitals of oxygen, respectively). (c) Band structure of BiFeO3 material obtained using PBE-GGA + U (4 eV) approximation.
Ijms 26 04671 g005
Table 2. Magnetic moments of iron atoms of the bismuth ferrite system calculated using PBE-GGA + U approximation.
Table 2. Magnetic moments of iron atoms of the bismuth ferrite system calculated using PBE-GGA + U approximation.
This WorkLiterature
BiFeO3
Magnetic moments of Fe ( µ B )
in an F e 4 + O 6 2 octahedral
3.81683.75 [28]
Bi2Fe4O9
Magnetic moments of Fe
in an F e 4 + O 6 2 octahedral ( µ B )
3.67773.9 [26]
Magnetic moments of Fe
in an F e 3 + O 4 2 Tetrahedral ( µ B )
3.78544.95 [29]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mallek-Zouari, I.; Kaddar, Y.; Ben Taazayet, W.; Mounkachi, O.; Hlil, E.-K.; Thabet Mliki, N.; El Moutaouakil, A. First-Principles Investigation of Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 Nanostructures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104671

AMA Style

Mallek-Zouari I, Kaddar Y, Ben Taazayet W, Mounkachi O, Hlil E-K, Thabet Mliki N, El Moutaouakil A. First-Principles Investigation of Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 Nanostructures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(10):4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104671

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mallek-Zouari, Ikbel, Youness Kaddar, Wael Ben Taazayet, Omar Mounkachi, El-Kebir Hlil, Najeh Thabet Mliki, and Amine El Moutaouakil. 2025. "First-Principles Investigation of Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 Nanostructures" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 10: 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104671

APA Style

Mallek-Zouari, I., Kaddar, Y., Ben Taazayet, W., Mounkachi, O., Hlil, E.-K., Thabet Mliki, N., & El Moutaouakil, A. (2025). First-Principles Investigation of Structural, Electronic, and Magnetic Properties of BiFeO3 and Bi2Fe4O9 Nanostructures. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(10), 4671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26104671

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop