You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Annette Vaglio-Garro1,2,
  • Andrey V. Kozlov1,2,* and
  • Yuliya D. Smirnova1,3
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

All the figs should be high resolution figs.

Some of the references are missing in the following paragraph.

In contrast to astrocytes, neurons obligatory require mitochondria with active oxida tive phosphorylation (OxPhos) and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA-cycle). They have higher energetic demands to support extensive ion flows accompanying activation of neurons and signal transmission, and consequently mitochondria play a key role in the energy 136 metabolism in neurons. This suggests that neurons, rather than astrocytes, can burn glutamate in mitochondria, subsequently extracting it from the glutamate-glutamine pool, 138 and prevent glutamate toxicity.

 

Provide a table where glutamate toxicity leads to diseases.

 

Please write about how could glutamate toxicity be addressed in humans?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

There are two main issues:

1) What is the role of glutamate cell signaling? The authors have to show that in the text under a separate title. Also, the authors have to show the importance of glutamate in the acid-base balance.

2) What is the Km value in Figure 2? Km is an important enzyme constant, and it is suggested to use another expression other than Km and to express it as Ka, which is the abbreviation of affinity constant.

3) Figure quality should be improved. Are the figures designed by the authors without the involvement of a third party?

Other issues:

Is the first figure a graphical abstract? It is not numbered, and it is better to denote that it is a graphical abstract.

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor revision of English is required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors showed a good response.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing is required.