Next Article in Journal
Special Issue “The Tight Junction and Its Proteins: From Structure to Pathologies”
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Natalizumab on sNfL and sGFAP Levels in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Progress of Ribosomal Proteins in Reproductive Development

by
Yuqi Hong
,
Qisheng Lin
,
Yuan Zhang
,
Jilong Liu
and
Zhanhong Zheng
*
College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(23), 13151; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313151
Submission received: 9 October 2024 / Revised: 28 November 2024 / Accepted: 3 December 2024 / Published: 7 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
Ribosomal proteins constitute the principal components of ribosomes, and their functions span a wide spectrum. Recent investigations have unveiled their involvement in oocyte and embryo development, playing a pivotal role in reproductive development. Numerous pieces of evidence indicate that ribosomal proteins participate in the regulation of various cellular activities, including nucleolar stress, oxidative stress, cell proliferation and autophagy. Despite these findings, the precise mechanisms through which ribosomal proteins influence reproductive development via these cellular activities remain elusive. Therefore, elucidating the mechanisms of action is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the role and function of ribosomal proteins in reproductive development. This paper systematically reviews the progress in research on nucleolar stress, oxidative stress, cell proliferation and autophagy concerning ribosomal proteins during reproductive development. Furthermore, we explore the potential of ribosomal proteins as diagnostic markers for various diseases. Additionally, we propose the development of drugs and therapies targeting ribosomal proteins, underscoring the potential for novel medical interventions in the context of reproductive health.

1. Introduction

Infertility has emerged as a significant societal concern in recent years, with its increasing global prevalence attributed to a myriad of factors, including age at childbearing, occupational factors, substance abuse, environmental pollution, sexual infections and lifestyle choices. Notably, this condition is affecting individuals at increasingly younger ages [1]. In the United States, approximately 10% of women experiences infertility [2]. A population-based epidemiological survey encompassing eight provinces in China unveiled a concerning prevalence of infertility, with a staggering 15.5% prevalence rate observed among couples cohabiting for over a year, where wives were aged 20 to 49 [3]. In Henan Province specifically, the prevalence of infertility among women of childbearing age stands at 24.58%, with primary and secondary infertility rates documented at 6.54% and 18.04%, respectively [4].
Reproduction constitutes a complex process encompassing various stages, including sperm development, oocyte development, sperm–egg fusion, embryo implantation, decidualization, placenta formation and the maintenance of pregnancy [5,6]. It is noteworthy that each of these stages involves cell proliferation, differentiation and development, all of which entail significant protein engagement [7]. Consequently, ribosome biosynthesis increases within cells to meet this heightened demand during reproductive development [8]. Emerging research underscores the regulatory roles played by ribosomal proteins in ribosome biosynthesis, as well as their pivotal significance in oocyte development, sperm development and embryonic growth [9,10,11]. These findings underscore the critical importance of ribosomal proteins in the realm of reproductive development. In this review, we provided an extensive overview of relevant studies investigating the roles of ribosomal proteins in reproductive development, with a particular focus on recent advances in our understanding of nucleolar stress, oxidative stress, cell proliferation and autophagy of these proteins.

2. Classification and Function of Ribosomal Proteins

Ribosomal proteins (RPs) represent the fundamental constituents of ribosomes [12]. In bacterial ribosomes, the formation of small subunits involves 21 ribosomal proteins, while 33 ribosomal proteins contribute to the constitution of large subunits. Conversely, eukaryotic ribosomes comprise 33 ribosomal proteins in small subunits and 47 in large subunits [13]. Ribosomal proteins associated with the assembly of the 40 S subunit are designated as RPS, whereas those involved in the assembly of the 60S subunit are denoted as RPL [14].
Ribosomal proteins serve a myriad of functions [15]. Their essential roles encompass participation in ribosome subunit assembly and ribosome biogenesis [8]. Additionally, ribosomal proteins exhibit extra functions, such as involvement in cell cycle regulation, DNA repair, antimicrobial and antiviral activities [16,17,18]. For example, ribosomal proteins are involved in the p53 pathway induced by nucleolar stress; binding to Mouse double minute (MDM2), thereby mediating p53 stabilization and inducing nucleolar stress and cell cycle arrest [19]. In addition, RPLP0 binds to the RRM1 and RRM2 domains of NONO to enhance non-homologous end-ligation-mediated DNA double-strand break repair [20]. Some studies suggest that ribosomal proteins possess antibacterial properties. RPS23 and RPS15 have been demonstrated to exhibit antimicrobial peptide activity, capable of eliminating both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [16,21,22]. Furthermore, specific ribosomal proteins can interact with viral proteins to neutralize viruses and exert antiviral effects. For instance, RPS10 can interact with swine fever virus protein Npro, inhibiting swine fever virus replication [23]. However, some ribosomal proteins can directly bind to viral mRNA to promote viral proliferation. For example, the mRNA of vesicular stomatitis virus may directly bind to RPL40, or RPL40 may cause conformational changes in the 60S subunit to promote preferential translation of viral mRNA [24]. Therefore, ribosomal proteins may play different roles in different viral replication. It is noteworthy that the absence or mutation of ribosomal protein genes can result in defective ribosomal protein expression, potentially leading to ribosomal diseases. Approximately 50% of Diamond–Blackfan anemia (DBA) patients exhibit gene mutation in ribosomal proteins, with congenital loss-of-function mutations in RPS19, RPS10, RPL11 and RPL5 being the most prevalent [25].
Ribosomal proteins have emerged as promising diagnostic markers for various diseases. For instance, RPL5 and RPL10 have been identified as potential diagnostic markers for atypical teratoid/rhabdomyoid tumors [26]. Furthermore, a significant upregulation of RPL22L1 and RPS21 expression in prostate cancer tissues was observed, suggesting their potential utility as diagnostic markers for prostate cancer [27]. In the context of gastric cancer, RPL15, RPL6 and RPS13 exhibited upregulated expressions, while in colorectal cancer, RPS18, RPS23, RPL28 and RPL32 were found to be downregulated, implicating these ribosomal proteins as potential diagnostic markers for gastric and colorectal cancers, respectively [18]. Notably, RPS24 plays a pivotal role in human colon cancer, with its knockdown leading to significant inhibition of colon cancer cell proliferation, suggesting its potential application in colon cancer diagnosis [28]. Moreover, RPL23A has demonstrated promise as a prognostic marker for rectal cancer [29]. These findings underscore the diagnostic potential of ribosomal proteins in various malignancies.

3. Ribosomal Proteins and Reproductive Development

RPS3 is expressed highly in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Knocking out RPS3 in fertilized eggs led to a developmental arrest, which prevented progression to the blastocyst stage. These findings prove the crucial role of RPS3 in early embryonic development [30]. Another investigation observed that in developing oocytes, the inactivation of one allele of RPS6 resulted in the generation of S6 heterozygous embryos. Notably, oogenesis and embryonic development proceeded normally until embryonic day 5.5. However, after this stage, a cell cycle arrest occurred during the M phase, accompanied by defective cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. The embryos finally died at the gastrula stage. These results suggest that RPS6 plays an indispensable role in oocyte development. Nevertheless, further research is needed to elucidate the mechanism by which RPS6 influences embryonic cell survival [31]. Similarly, mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (MRPs) including MRPL3, MRPL22, MRPL44, MRP18c and MRPS22 have been knocked down in mutant mouse embryos. It was found that the embryos failed to initiate gastrulation at day 7.5, leading to embryonic demise. Notably, these five mitochondrial ribosomal proteins exhibited abundant expression both before and after implantation in normal mouse embryos, suggesting their potential contribution to gastrulation [32]. Furthermore, the deficiency of RPL10a was found to result in embryonic developmental delay, abnormal embryonic morphology and increased apoptosis in zebrafish [33]. In another study by Sijia et al., interference with the expression of RPL11 and RPS2 led to a significant decrease in the oviposition rate, egg-hatching rate and fecundity of Phytoseiidae, suggesting the potential involvement of RPL11 and RPS2 in egg formation and the development of Phytoseiidae [34]. In higher plant cells, RPL14B was found to guide pollen tube growth during fertilization, a critical process for successful fertilization in higher plants. Therefore, RPL14B plays an essential role in reproduction [35].
In summary, ribosomal proteins emerge as pivotal contributors to various reproductive activities across diverse organisms (as shown in Table 1). However, the intricate molecular mechanisms underpinning their regulatory roles remain incompletely elucidated. Consequently, there is a compelling interest in deciphering the precise mechanisms through which ribosomal proteins exert their influence on reproductive development. This endeavor promises to enhance our comprehension of the multifaceted roles and functions of ribosomal proteins within the realm of reproductive development. Hence, this review delves into the extant literature on ribosomal proteins, offering a comprehensive overview of the progress made in understanding their involvement in reproductive development. Specifically, as shown in Figure 1, we have distilled their impact on three fundamental facets of this process: (1) cellular stress, (2) cell proliferation and (3) cell autophagy. By exploring these dimensions, we aim to provide the advancements in ribosomal proteins’ contributions to reproductive development.

3.1. Influence of Ribosomal Proteins on Stress

3.1.1. Influence of Ribosomal Proteins on Nucleolar Stress

When cells are exposed to various stressors such as hypoxia, toxins and nutrient deprivation, they undergo a condition known as nucleolar stress, also referred to as ribosome stress [49]. During this state, the nucleolus experiences morphological alterations and functional deficiencies, ultimately culminating in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis or autophagy dysfunction through the activation of the p53 signaling pathway or other stress signals [50]. Donati and Havel et al. have provided evidence that when nucleolar stress occurs, RPL11 relocates from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, where it forms a complex with RPL5 and 5S rRNA. This complex binds to MDM2 in the nucleoplasm, preventing the ubiquitination and degradation of p53, thereby activating the p53 pathway [51,52]. Furthermore, RPS27a has been identified as a novel RPL11-binding protein. Knockdown of RPS27a reduces its interaction with RPL11 but promotes the binding of RPL11 to MDM2, resulting in p53 activation, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis [53]. Additionally, RPS25 interacts with MDM2, inhibiting its E3 ligase activity, leading to p53 stabilization and activation. Knockdown of RPS25 attenuates p53 activation following nucleolar stress [54]. Notably, deletion of 24 out of 80 human ribosomal proteins activates p53, leading to a 5- to 10-fold increase in p53 levels [55].
Some studies have highlighted the significance of ribosomal protein loss in activating the p53 pathway and its consequences on embryonic development and survival. Knockdown of RPL11 expression in zebrafish resulted in p53 pathway activation and aberrant brain development in RPL11-deficient embryos. This condition was characterized by widespread apoptosis and the upregulation of genes associated with the p53 pathway, ultimately leading to embryonic mortality [38]. Similarly, in RPS7-deficient zebrafish embryos, p53 activation was observed, accompanied by apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Moreover, RPS7 deficiency severely impaired hematopoietic function in these embryos, resulting in developmental anomalies [39]. Furthermore, DNA damage in spermatogonia induced by carbon ion radiation could trigger nucleolar stress, down-regulating the expression of RPL27a. The reduction in RPL27a levels, in turn, activated p53, leading to spermatogonia apoptosis and ultimately causing male infertility [40].
Embryo implantation and decidualization are crucial processes in reproductive development. However, the current scientific literature lacks comprehensive reports on the regulatory role of ribosomal proteins in nucleolar stress in these events. It was revealed that nucleolar stress occurs during mouse embryo implantation induced by actinomycin D. Nucleolar stress was also detected in uterine cavity epithelial cells during the receptive state, leading to activation of the p53 pathway. Interestingly, in human endometrial epithelial cells, actinomycin D-induced nucleolar stress promoted embryonic adhesion, suggesting the presence of nucleolar stress during early pregnancy in both mice and humans, and its potential to induce embryo implantation [56]. Furthermore, the low-dose actinomycin D-induced nucleolar stress can facilitate the transition from a matrix to an epithelial state, thereby promoting decidualization [57]. Consequently, it remains an intriguing question whether ribosomal proteins can promote embryo implantation and decidualization through the activation of the p53 pathway. This hypothesis requires additional experimental data for validation and a more in-depth understanding.

3.1.2. Influence of Ribosomal Proteins on Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stress arises from an imbalance characterized by elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and a deficiency of antioxidants, leading to physiological irregularities within cells, ultimately resulting in cellular dysfunction and death. An increasing body of research has established that oxidative stress is not limited to diseases such as inflammation and cancer but also extends to reproductive disorders [58]. Persistent and potent oxidative stress has been reported to compromise the antioxidant function of the placenta, leading to damage to lipids, proteins and DNA within placental tissue. This, in turn, accelerates premature placental aging and insufficiency, adversely impacting fetal viability [59]. Moreover, it has been observed that infertile men exhibit higher levels of ROS in their semen compared to their fertile counterparts. Excessive ROS in semen can impair sperm activity, cause DNA damage and result in compromised sperm function, thereby contributing to male reproductive dysfunction. Consequently, oxidative stress is considered a pivotal factor in male infertility [60,61]. These findings show the profound impact of oxidative stress on the reproductive and developmental processes of the body, highlighting the significance of investigating the relationship between ribosomal proteins and oxidative stress.
It has been reported that exposure to low concentrations of hydrogen peroxide induces oxidative stress in HeLa cells, resulting in the carbonylation of RPL32 and RPL35 within these cells. The carbonylated forms of RPL32 and RPL35 undergo subsequent regulation by apoptosis and autophagy, likely as a mechanism to impede the proliferation of cells that have incurred damage due to oxidative stress [62]. Furthermore, exposure to low levels of hydrogen peroxide has been shown to significantly reduce the rate of blastocyst formation and impede embryonic development [63]. In a separate study, the downregulation of MRPL24 expression in Caenorhabditis elegans resulted in alterations in mitochondrial function, subsequently triggering an oxidative stress response mediated by SKN-1. This genetic intervention led to marked developmental delays, reduced size and diminished offspring production in the larvae [41]. Moreover, investigations have indicated that the knockdown of RPS9M disrupts mitochondrial ribosome biogenesis and increases ROS production, culminating in oxidative stress-induced embryonic abnormalities and defects. These findings underscore the pivotal role of RPS9M in Arabidopsis male gametogenesis and seed development [42].
The regulatory effect of ribosomal proteins on oxidative stress is not only reflected in the process of reproductive development but also plays a role in the occurrence of other diseases. A case in point is Diamond–Blackfan anemia, a condition characterized by oxidative stress and predominantly linked to pathogenic variants within ribosomal protein genes [64]. Kapralova et al. discovered that the absence of RPL5 and RPS19 in mouse erythroleukemia cells led to the downregulation of superoxide dismutase and catalase expression, concomitant with elevated ROS levels. This observation suggests that the expression of RPL5 and RPS19 is intricately associated with cellular antioxidant capacity, potentially rendering cells less resistant to excessive ROS levels upon their loss [65]. Furthermore, Prakash et al. ascertained that RPSB possesses antioxidative stress properties. Specifically, mycobacteria expressing RPSB exhibited enhanced resilience to oxidative stress induced by 2.5 mM hydrogen peroxide, 0.05% SDS and starvation. Additionally, these RPSB-expressing mycobacteria reduced levels of drug-induced ROS. This finding underscores the potential role of RPSB in conferring anti-stress capabilities to mycobacterial species [66].

3.2. Influence of Ribosomal Proteins on Proliferation

RPL5 has been reported to stimulate the proliferation of colon cells through the activation of the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway [67]. Similarly, RPL22L1 has the capability to activate the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, promoting the proliferation of prostate cancer cells, offering a promising avenue for prostate cancer therapy [68]. Overexpression of RPS15A can activate the mTOR pathway and promote the proliferation of gastric cancer cells, thereby promoting the progression of gastric cancer [69]. Knockdown of RPS6 results in cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase, ultimately restraining the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells [37]. Notably, following the knockdown of RPL39 in trophoblast cells, an increase in the number of cells in the G0/G1 phase and a decrease in the number of cells in the S phase occur, thereby implicating RPL39 in cell cycle regulation and the inhibition of trophoblast cell proliferation [44]. Additionally, RPL10A induces insulin receptor overexpression to activate insulin signaling, affecting cell proliferation [70]. Clinical evidence reveals the high expression of RPL34 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient samples, and the overexpression of RPL34 has been shown to promote malignant proliferation in NSCLC cells [71]. Moreover, in mouse cochlea, the overexpression of RPS14 has been linked to enhanced Sertoli cell proliferation through the activation of the WNT signaling pathway [45]. Collectively, these findings underscore the multifaceted roles of ribosomal proteins in the regulation of cell proliferation across diverse signaling pathways. It is noteworthy that the WNT/β-catenin pathway plays an important role in various aspects of embryonic development, particularly during early embryonic development and placental development. Additionally, the WNT/β-catenin pathway governs the proliferation of embryonic stem cells and augments embryo implantation potential [72,73]. The WNT/β-catenin pathway has been recognized for its regulatory roles in physiological processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation and invasion [74]. Dysregulation of the WNT/β-catenin pathway in the endometrium can result in embryo implantation failure and severe pathological changes in the endometrium, including conditions like endometrial cancer and endometriosis [75]. Hence, exploring the association between ribosomal proteins and the WNT/β-catenin pathway in the context of reproductive development is of paramount importance.
Specifically, the knockdown of RPL10 resulted in a reduction of TCF4/LEF1 protein levels, effectively inhibiting the WNT/β-catenin pathway [76]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, RPS15A was found to promote angiogenesis by enhancing WNT/β-catenin-induced FGF18 expression. Significantly, inhibiting RPS15A expression markedly impeded tumor growth and angiogenesis in tumors [77]. Moreover, RPS15A exhibits high expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines and facilitates the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through the WNT/β-catenin pathway [78]. Knockdown of RPS15A was also shown to inhibit the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells [43]. Within the MYC family, c-MYC is intricately involved in ribosomal protein synthesis and is a direct target of β-catenin [14]. However, it is worth noting that RPL5, RPL11 and RPS14 can inhibit the transcriptional activity of c-MYC [79,80,81]. Furthermore, RPL5 and RPL11 exhibit synergistic effects in down-regulating c-MYC expression through a negative feedback regulation mechanism [82]. Additionally, the inactivation of APC has been shown to dysregulate the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway, leading to overexpression of c-MYC, RPL11 and RPL5 [83]. In short, ribosomal proteins are strongly intertwined with the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway. Nonetheless, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms through which ribosomal proteins engage with the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway during reproductive development remains limited.

3.3. Influence of Ribosomal Proteins on Autophagy

Autophagy, a catabolic process triggered in response to various cellular stressors, serves as a protective mechanism against diverse cytotoxic insults [84]. In recent years, mounting evidence has illustrated the significance of autophagy dysregulation in an array of human diseases, encompassing neurodegenerative conditions, infectious ailments, autoimmune disorders, as well as various cancers [85]. Notably, it is imperative to recognize the pivotal role that autophagy plays in female reproduction [86]. Studies by Su et al. have emphasized the essential role of endometrial autophagy in early pregnancy and its association with early pregnancy endometriosis, which can result in implantation abnormalities in embryos [87]. In addition, the autophagy gene Atg16L1 is indispensable for the decidualization of the endometrium. In the absence of Atg16L1, the number of embryos capable of successful implantation was significantly reduced and mouse endometrial stromal cells failed to undergo proper decidualization. Furthermore, interference with Atg16L1 expression in human endometrial stromal cells downregulated the expression of decidualization markers, including RPL and IGFBP1 [88]. Consequently, the development of safe and effective natural products capable of regulating endometrial autophagy has been proposed as a novel treatment strategy for female infertility [89]. It is also important to note that autophagy plays a crucial role in male reproduction. ARMC3, for instance, is beneficial for autophagy activity during spermatogenesis. The deficiency of ARMC3 can impede ribosomal autophagy, resulting in an elevated level of ribosomal proteins and eventual sperm immobility, ultimately leading to complete male infertility [90].
Decreased mTOR activity, reduced RPS6 phosphorylation and increased autophagy were found in hypoxic human primary trophoblast cells. This suggests that autophagy may enhance placental function in vivo by eliminating organelles damaged due to hypoxia [36]. In the context of pregnancy complications, such as pre-eclampsia, characterized by impaired autophagy, treatment of autophagy-deficient trophoblasts with serum from pre-eclampsia patients led to elevated levels of phosphorylated RPS6KB, increased rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) activity and the accumulation of placental protein aggregates. These findings may contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes [91]. Additionally, the expression of RPS7 in red blood cells of zebrafish embryos was linked to increased cell autophagy [92]. In placentas from intrauterine growth restriction pregnancies, decreased protein expression of RPL26 and RPS10 positively correlated with mTORC1 signaling [93]. Recently, it has been reported that RPL5 inhibits breast cancer cell growth by regulating ER stress and autophagy through E2F1 in breast cancer cells and tissues [46]. Moreover, the down-regulation of RPLP proteins, including RPLP0, RPLP1 and RPLP2, resulted in reduced proliferation, cell cycle arrest and induced autophagy in breast and ovarian cancer cells [47]. It was reported that interfering with RPS27L expression shortens the protein half-life of β-TrCP, leads to the accumulation of DEPTOR to inactivate mTORC1 and finally significantly induces autophagy in breast cancer cells and mouse fibroblasts [48]. In summary, decreased expression of ribosomal proteins leads to increased autophagy during reproductive development. Interestingly, the same regulatory effect of ribosomal protein expression on autophagy seems to exist during the study of other diseases. Similarly, Rps23-deficient HEK293 cells were susceptible to proteotoxic stress, with reduced cell viability and a three-fold decrease in apoptosis rate after treatment with the autophagy activator rapamycin [94]. Knockdown of RSL1D1 promoted autophagy, invasion and migration of colon cancer cells, while overexpression of RSL1D1 inhibited autophagy in colon cancer cells [95]. Collectively, these studies highlight the key role of normal ribosomal protein expression in maintaining autophagic homeostasis.

4. Conclusions

Statistical data reveal that the monthly success rate of human pregnancy stands at approximately 30%, with a significant portion of pregnancy failures attributed to unsuccessful embryo implantation [96]. Ribosomal proteins are involved in the regulation of a variety of cell activities, and their roles in reproductive development have also been reported. However, there are few reports on specific reproductive activities such as embryo implantation and decidualization. Undoubtedly, embryo implantation and decidualization are the key events in reproductive development. Therefore, it is of great interest to study the role of ribosomal proteins in the process of embryo implantation and decidualization and further reveal the specific molecular mechanism of ribosomal proteins.
Cell stress, cell proliferation and autophagy are important activities for the normal operation of cells, which are closely related to the reproductive and developmental process of the body. Many studies have suggested that ribosomal proteins are involved in cell stress, cell proliferation and autophagy, thereby exerting influence on reproductive development. In terms of cell stress, existing studies have predominantly concentrated on exploring the association between ribosomal protein loss and defects in embryonic development and embryo mortality; there remains a dearth of investigations into their involvement in other reproductive events, particularly embryo implantation and decidualization. Therefore, an endeavor can be undertaken to elucidate whether ribosomal proteins contribute to embryo implantation and decidualization by instigating nucleolar stress. Concerning cell proliferation, ribosomal proteins are known to regulate this process through diverse signaling pathways. A growing body of evidence underscores the close relationship between ribosomal proteins and the WNT/β-catenin pathway. Therefore, future research avenues could go into whether ribosomal proteins are downstream targets of this pathway. In the realm of autophagy, the loss of ribosomal proteins has been associated with autophagy activation, primarily within the placental context. However, the variety of ribosomal proteins involved in this process is limited. Future research endeavors may unearth additional ribosomal proteins implicated in placental autophagy, thereby shedding further light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the relationship between ribosomal proteins and autophagy. In addition, the relationship between ribosomal proteins and autophagy during embryo implantation and decidualization has not been reported, so this is also worthy of further exploration.
In the future, it is of great interest to investigate the specific regulatory mechanisms of ribosomal proteins on cellular stress, cell proliferation and autophagy during reproductive development. It has been reported that the expression of MRPL15 is significantly increased in ovarian cancer patients and is associated with poor prognosis of patients. MRPL15 may play a role in ovarian cancer through cell cycle or DNA repair pathways. Therefore, MRPL15 can be used as a new prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for epithelial ovarian cancer [97]. Furthermore, compared with normal tissues, RPLP0, RPLP1and RPLP2 are significantly up-regulated in gynecologic tumors such as ovarian and endometrial cancers, suggesting that these proteins can be used as specific prognostic markers and related therapeutic targets for gynecological tumors [98]. Therefore, the development of medicine and therapeutic methods targeting ribosomal proteins may be an effective strategy for the treatment of reproductive and developmental diseases caused by cell stress, cell proliferation, autophagy and other disorders. As shown in Figure 2, we mapped some ribosomal proteins that could serve as biomarkers in reproductive diseases. In summary, an in-depth exploration of the specific functions of ribosomal proteins in reproductive development holds significant promise for treating infertility-related conditions and enhancing clinical pregnancy rates.

Author Contributions

Y.H. and Q.L. collected the literature, drew diagrams and wrote the manuscript. Y.Z., J.L. and Z.Z. revised the literature. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This manuscript contains no experimental data, and all referenced literature is sourced from the PubMed database.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. All authors consent to the publication of this work. No other consent is required.

References

  1. Wang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, T.; Xu, X.; Tang, Q.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Hu, W.; Wu, W. Feasibility analysis of incorporating infertility into medical insurance in China. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 967739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stentz, N.C.; Koelper, N.; Barnhart, K.T.; Sammel, M.D.; Senapati, S. Infertility and mortality. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 251.e1–251.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhou, Z.; Zheng, D.; Wu, H.; Li, R.; Xu, S.; Kang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, S.; et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: A population-based study. Bjog 2018, 125, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liang, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, H.; Cui, C.; Xu, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C. Prevalence and associated factors of infertility among 20–49 year old women in Henan Province, China. Reprod. Health 2021, 18, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, K.; Liang, J.; Qin, T.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Embryo Implantation. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 809596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, Y.; Gu, M.; Chen, L.; Shen, H.; Pan, Y.; Pang, Y.; Miao, S.; Tong, R.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Recent advances in critical nodes of embryo engineering technology. Theranostics 2021, 11, 7391–7424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mercer, M.; Jang, S.; Ni, C.; Buszczak, M. The Dynamic Regulation of mRNA Translation and Ribosome Biogenesis During Germ Cell Development and Reproductive Aging. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 710186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, J.; Brajanovski, N.; Chan, K.T.; Xuan, J.; Pearson, R.B.; Sanij, E. Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: Molecular mechanisms and targeted therapy. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Higa, R.; Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Jansson, T.; Jawerbaum, A. Inhibition of MTOR signaling impairs rat embryo organogenesis by affecting folate availability. Reproduction 2021, 161, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jang, S.; Lee, J.; Mathews, J.; Ruess, H.; Williford, A.O.; Rangan, P.; Betrán, E.; Buszczak, M. The Drosophila ribosome protein S5 paralog RpS5b promotes germ cell and follicle cell differentiation during oogenesis. Development 2021, 148, dev199511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zou, Q.; Yang, L.; Shi, R.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Qi, H. Proteostasis regulated by testis-specific ribosomal protein RPL39L maintains mouse spermatogenesis. iScience 2021, 24, 103396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ryu, H.Y. SUMO pathway is required for ribosome biogenesis. BMB Rep. 2022, 55, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilson, D.N.; Doudna Cate, J.H. The structure and function of the eukaryotic ribosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2012, 4, a011536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Destefanis, F.; Manara, V.; Bellosta, P. Myc as a Regulator of Ribosome Biogenesis and Cell Competition: A Link to Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. El Khoury, W.; Nasr, Z. Deregulation of ribosomal proteins in human cancers. Biosci. Rep. 2021, 41, bsr20211577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Y.; Yao, L.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ji, G. Identification of ribosomal protein L30 as an uncharacterized antimicrobial protein. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2021, 120, 104067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jang, C.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, J. RpS3, a DNA repair endonuclease and ribosomal protein, is involved in apoptosis. FEBS Lett. 2004, 560, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, W.; Nag, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.H.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, R. Ribosomal proteins and human diseases: Pathogenesis, molecular mechanisms, and therapeutic implications. Med. Res. Rev. 2015, 35, 225–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Russo, A.; Russo, G. Ribosomal Proteins Control or Bypass p53 during Nucleolar Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.L.; Zhao, W.W.; Bai, S.M.; Ma, Y.; Yin, X.K.; Feng, L.L.; Zeng, G.D.; Wang, F.; Feng, W.X.; Zheng, J.; et al. DNA damage-induced paraspeckle formation enhances DNA repair and tumor radioresistance by recruiting ribosomal protein P0. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Z.; Qu, B.; Yao, L.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, S. Identification and functional characterization of ribosomal protein S23 as a new member of antimicrobial protein. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2020, 110, 103730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qu, B.; Ma, Z.; Yao, L.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, S. Preserved antibacterial activity of ribosomal protein S15 during evolution. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 127, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lv, H.; Dong, W.; Qian, G.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Cao, Z.; Lv, Q.; Wang, C.; Guo, K.; Zhang, Y. uS10, a novel Npro-interacting protein, inhibits classical swine fever virus replication. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 1679–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miller, C.M.; Selvam, S.; Fuchs, G. Fatal attraction: The roles of ribosomal proteins in the viral life cycle. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2021, 12, e1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kampen, K.R.; Sulima, S.O.; Vereecke, S.; De Keersmaecker, K. Hallmarks of ribosomopathies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, 1013–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ren, Y.; Tao, C.; Wang, X.; Ju, Y. Identification of RPL5 and RPL10 as novel diagnostic biomarkers of Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liang, Z.; Mou, Q.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, G.; Cao, Y.; Gao, Z.; Pan, Z.; Feng, W. Identification of candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for human prostate cancer: RPL22L1 and RPS21. Med. Oncol. 2019, 36, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Sui, J.; Li, X.; Cao, F.; He, J.; Yang, B.; Zhu, X.; Sun, Y.; Pu, Y.D. RPS24 knockdown inhibits colorectal cancer cell migration and proliferation in vitro. Gene 2015, 571, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Fang, M.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Feng, Q.; Hu, R.; Xu, J. HERC3 directly targets RPL23A for ubiquitination degradation and further regulates Colorectal Cancer proliferation and the cell cycle. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2022, 18, 3282–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, H.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J.; Huo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, T. Knockdown of ribosomal protein S3 causes preimplantation developmental arrest in mice. Theriogenology 2019, 129, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Panić, L.; Tamarut, S.; Sticker-Jantscheff, M.; Barkić, M.; Solter, D.; Uzelac, M.; Grabusić, K.; Volarević, S. Ribosomal protein S6 gene haploinsufficiency is associated with activation of a p53-dependent checkpoint during gastrulation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 8880–8891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Cheong, A.; Archambault, D.; Degani, R.; Iverson, E.; Tremblay, K.D.; Mager, J. Nuclear-encoded mitochondrial ribosomal proteins are required to initiate gastrulation. Development 2020, 147, dev.188714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Palasin, K.; Uechi, T.; Yoshihama, M.; Srisowanna, N.; Choijookhuu, N.; Hishikawa, Y.; Kenmochi, N.; Chotigeat, W. Abnormal development of zebrafish after knockout and knockdown of ribosomal protein L10a. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 18130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sijia, B.; Jiale, L.; Juan, X.; Dianyi, S.; Endong, W.; Guiting, L.; Xuenong, X. RNAi mediated knockdown of RpL11, RpS2, and tra-2 led to reduced reproduction of Phytoseiulus persimilis. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2019, 78, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Luo, A.; Zhan, H.; Zhang, X.; Du, H.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, X. Cytoplasmic ribosomal protein L14B is essential for fertilization in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2020, 292, 110394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chen, B.; Longtine, M.S.; Nelson, D.M. Hypoxia induces autophagy in primary human trophoblasts. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 4946–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yang, X.; Xu, L.; Yang, Y.E.; Xiong, C.; Yu, J.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y. Knockdown of ribosomal protein S6 suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in epithelial ovarian cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chakraborty, A.; Uechi, T.; Higa, S.; Torihara, H.; Kenmochi, N. Loss of ribosomal protein L11 affects zebrafish embryonic development through a p53-dependent apoptotic response. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Duan, J.; Ba, Q.; Wang, Z.; Hao, M.; Li, X.; Hu, P.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, R.; Wang, H. Knockdown of ribosomal protein S7 causes developmental abnormalities via p53 dependent and independent pathways in zebrafish. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2011, 43, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, G.; Dou, Z.; Xie, Y.; Si, J.; Di, C. Heavy ion radiation-induced DNA damage mediates apoptosis via the Rpl27a-Rpl5-MDM2-p53/E2F1 signaling pathway in mouse spermatogonia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 201, 110831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ficociello, G.; Schifano, E.; Di Nottia, M.; Torraco, A.; Carrozzo, R.; Uccelletti, D.; Montanari, A. Silencing of the mitochondrial ribosomal protein L-24 gene activates the oxidative stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2023, 1867, 130255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lu, C.; Xie, Z.; Yu, F.; Tian, L.; Hao, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Li, D. Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S9M is involved in male gametogenesis and seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 655–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, H.; Qi, Y.; Wang, X.L.; Gu, J.J.; Shi, T.M. Down-regulation of lncRNA BLACAT1 inhibits ovarian cancer progression by suppressing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway via regulating miR-519d-3p. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2020, 467, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Jie, Q.; Sun, F.; Li, Q.; Zhu, J.; Wei, Y.; Yang, H.; Long, P.; Wang, Z.; Yang, X.; Li, D.; et al. Downregulated ribosomal protein L39 inhibits trophoblast cell migration and invasion by targeting E-cadherin in the placenta of patients with preeclampsia. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, C.; Qi, J.; Hu, X.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Q.; Li, N.; Chen, X.; Guo, F.; Wu, P.; Shi, Y.; et al. Rps14 upregulation promotes inner ear progenitor proliferation and hair cell regeneration in the neonatal mouse cochlea. Cell Prolif. 2023, 56, e13458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, B. Ribosomal protein L5 (RPL5)/ E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) signaling suppresses breast cancer progression via regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 8076–8086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Artero-Castro, A.; Perez-Alea, M.; Feliciano, A.; Leal, J.A.; Genestar, M.; Castellvi, J.; Peg, V.; Ramón, Y.C.S.; Lleonart, M.E. Disruption of the ribosomal P complex leads to stress-induced autophagy. Autophagy 2015, 11, 1499–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Xiong, X.; Liu, X.; Li, H.; He, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, Y. Ribosomal protein S27-like regulates autophagy via the β-TrCP-DEPTOR-mTORC1 axis. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chen, J.; Stark, L.A. Insights into the Relationship between Nucleolar Stress and the NF-κB Pathway. Trends Genet. 2019, 35, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, K.; Yang, J.; Yi, J. Nucleolar Stress: Hallmarks, sensing mechanism and diseases. Cell Stress 2018, 2, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Donati, G.; Peddigari, S.; Mercer, C.A.; Thomas, G. 5S ribosomal RNA is an essential component of a nascent ribosomal precursor complex that regulates the Hdm2-p53 checkpoint. Cell Rep. 2013, 4, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Havel, J.J.; Li, Z.; Cheng, D.; Peng, J.; Fu, H. Nuclear PRAS40 couples the Akt/mTORC1 signaling axis to the RPL11-HDM2-p53 nucleolar stress response pathway. Oncogene 2015, 34, 1487–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, H.; Zhang, H.; Huang, G.; Bing, Z.; Xu, D.; Liu, J.; Luo, H.; An, X. Loss of RPS27a expression regulates the cell cycle, apoptosis, and proliferation via the RPL11-MDM2-p53 pathway in lung adenocarcinoma cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 41, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Wang, M.H.; Xu, W.; Zhang, R. Identification of ribosomal protein S25 (RPS25)-MDM2-p53 regulatory feedback loop. Oncogene 2013, 32, 2782–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nicolas, E.; Parisot, P.; Pinto-Monteiro, C.; de Walque, R.; De Vleeschouwer, C.; Lafontaine, D.L. Involvement of human ribosomal proteins in nucleolar structure and p53-dependent nucleolar stress. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hu, W.; Liang, Y.X.; Luo, J.M.; Gu, X.W.; Chen, Z.C.; Fu, T.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Lin, S.; Diao, H.L.; Jia, B.; et al. Nucleolar stress regulation of endometrial receptivity in mouse models and human cell lines. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Liang, Y.X.; Hu, W.; Jin, Z.Y.; Diao, H.L.; Liu, L.; Yang, Y.; Fu, T.; Yang, Z.M. Nucleolar stress regulates stromal-epithelial transition via NPM1 during decidualization. Reproduction 2020, 160, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jelic, M.D.; Mandic, A.D.; Maricic, S.M.; Srdjenovic, B.U. Oxidative stress and its role in cancer. J. Cancer Res. Ther. 2021, 17, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sultana, Z.; Maiti, K.; Aitken, J.; Morris, J.; Dedman, L.; Smith, R. Oxidative stress, placental ageing-related pathologies and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 77, e12653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Moore, T.A.; Ahmad, I.M.; Zimmerman, M.C. Oxidative Stress and Preterm Birth: An Integrative Review. Biol. Res. Nurs. 2018, 20, 497–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Takeshima, T.; Usui, K.; Mori, K.; Asai, T.; Yasuda, K.; Kuroda, S.; Yumura, Y. Oxidative stress and male infertility. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2021, 20, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bollineni, R.C.; Hoffmann, R.; Fedorova, M. Proteome-wide profiling of carbonylated proteins and carbonylation sites in HeLa cells under mild oxidative stress conditions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014, 68, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huang, Y.; Li, Z.; Lin, E.; He, P.; Ru, G. Oxidative damage-induced hyperactive ribosome biogenesis participates in tumorigenesis of offspring by cross-interacting with the Wnt and TGF-β1 pathways in IVF embryos. Exp. Mol. Med. 2021, 53, 1792–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Macečková, Z.; Kubíčková, A.; De Sanctis, J.B.; Hajdúch, M. Effect of Glucocorticosteroids in Diamond-Blackfan Anaemia: Maybe Not as Elusive as It Seems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kapralova, K.; Jahoda, O.; Koralkova, P.; Gursky, J.; Lanikova, L.; Pospisilova, D.; Divoky, V.; Horvathova, M. Oxidative DNA Damage, Inflammatory Signature, and Altered Erythrocytes Properties in Diamond-Blackfan Anemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Prakash, C.; Pandey, M.; Talwar, S.; Singh, Y.; Kanojiya, S.; Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, N. Extra-ribosomal functions of Mtb RpsB in imparting stress resilience and drug tolerance to mycobacteria. Biochimie 2020, 177, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, H.; Liu, J.; Dang, Q.; Wang, X.; Chen, J.; Lin, X.; Yang, N.; Du, J.; Shi, H.; Liu, Y.; et al. Ribosomal protein RPL5 regulates colon cancer cell proliferation and migration through MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Yi, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, B.; Gao, G.; Tang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Pan, Z.; Wang, G.; Feng, W. Ribosomal protein L22-like1 promotes prostate cancer progression by activating PI3K/Akt/mTOR signalling pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2023, 27, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Bianba, T.; Pan, Y.; Wang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, Z. PSMC2 promotes the progression of gastric cancer via induction of RPS15A/mTOR pathway. Oncogenesis 2022, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chaichanit, N.; Wonglapsuwan, M.; Chotigeat, W. Ribosomal protein L10A and signaling pathway. Gene 2018, 674, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yang, S.; Cui, J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yan, H.; Tang, C.; Wang, H.; Qin, H.; Li, X.; Li, J.; et al. Over-expressed RPL34 promotes malignant proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells. Gene 2016, 576, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 2006, 127, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sidrat, T.; Rehman, Z.U.; Joo, M.D.; Lee, K.L.; Kong, I.K. Wnt/β-catenin Pathway-Mediated PPARδ Expression during Embryonic Development Differentiation and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Steinhart, Z.; Angers, S. Wnt signaling in development and tissue homeostasis. Development 2018, 145, dev146589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, J.J.; Xiao, Z.J.; Meng, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, M.K.; Huang, W.Q.; Sun, X.; Chen, H.; Duan, Y.G.; Jiang, X.; et al. MRP4 sustains Wnt/β-catenin signaling for pregnancy, endometriosis and endometrial cancer. Theranostics 2019, 9, 5049–5064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhu, X.; Yuan, C.; Tian, C.; Li, C.; Nie, F.; Song, X.; Zeng, R.; Wu, D.; Hao, X.; Li, L. The plant sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling by blocking synthesis of the transcriptional regulators TCF4/LEF1. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 5335–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guo, P.; Wang, Y.; Dai, C.; Tao, C.; Wu, F.; Xie, X.; Yu, H.; Zhu, Q.; Li, J.; Ye, L.; et al. Ribosomal protein S15a promotes tumor angiogenesis via enhancing Wnt/β-catenin-induced FGF18 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2018, 37, 1220–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Liang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Tan, J.; Li, E.; Li, F. Overexpression of microRNA-519d-3p suppressed the growth of pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting ribosomal protein S15A-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2019, 304, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dai, M.S.; Sun, X.X.; Lu, H. Ribosomal protein L11 associates with c-Myc at 5 S rRNA and tRNA genes and regulates their expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12587–12594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Park, J.E.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, H.J.; Sim, D.Y.; Im, E.; Park, W.Y.; Shim, B.S.; Ko, S.G.; Kim, S.H. Ribosomal protein L5 mediated inhibition of c-Myc is critically involved in sanggenon G induced apoptosis in non-small lung cancer cells. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhou, X.; Hao, Q.; Liao, J.M.; Liao, P.; Lu, H. Ribosomal protein S14 negatively regulates c-Myc activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 21793–21801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Liao, J.M.; Zhou, X.; Gatignol, A.; Lu, H. Ribosomal proteins L5 and L11 co-operatively inactivate c-Myc via RNA-induced silencing complex. Oncogene 2014, 33, 4916–4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, S.; Tackmann, N.R.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y. Disruption of the RP-MDM2-p53 pathway accelerates APC loss-induced colorectal tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2017, 36, 1374–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dikic, I.; Elazar, Z. Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kocak, M.; Ezazi Erdi, S.; Jorba, G.; Maestro, I.; Farrés, J.; Kirkin, V.; Martinez, A.; Pless, O. Targeting autophagy in disease: Established and new strategies. Autophagy 2022, 18, 473–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Gao, H.; Khawar, M.B.; Li, W. Essential role of autophagy in resource allocation during sexual reproduction. Autophagy 2020, 16, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Su, Y.; Zhang, J.J.; He, J.L.; Liu, X.Q.; Chen, X.M.; Ding, Y.B.; Tong, C.; Peng, C.; Geng, Y.Q.; Wang, Y.X.; et al. Endometrial autophagy is essential for embryo implantation during early pregnancy. J. Mol. Med. 2020, 98, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Oestreich, A.K.; Chadchan, S.B.; Popli, P.; Medvedeva, A.; Rowen, M.N.; Stephens, C.S.; Xu, R.; Lydon, J.P.; Demayo, F.J.; Jungheim, E.S.; et al. The Autophagy Gene Atg16L1 is Necessary for Endometrial Decidualization. Endocrinology 2020, 161, bqz039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Park, H.; Cho, M.; Do, Y.; Park, J.K.; Bae, S.J.; Joo, J.; Ha, K.T. Autophagy as a Therapeutic Target of Natural Products Enhancing Embryo Implantation. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lei, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Q.; Liu, S.; Li, C.; Jiang, H.; Lin, H.; Kong, E.; Liu, J.; Qi, S.; et al. Autophagic elimination of ribosomes during spermiogenesis provides energy for flagellar motility. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 2313–2328.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Nakashima, A.; Cheng, S.B.; Ikawa, M.; Yoshimori, T.; Huber, W.J.; Menon, R.; Huang, Z.; Fierce, J.; Padbury, J.F.; Sadovsky, Y.; et al. Evidence for lysosomal biogenesis proteome defect and impaired autophagy in preeclampsia. Autophagy 2020, 16, 1771–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Heijnen, H.F.; van Wijk, R.; Pereboom, T.C.; Goos, Y.J.; Seinen, C.W.; van Oirschot, B.A.; van Dooren, R.; Gastou, M.; Giles, R.H.; van Solinge, W.; et al. Ribosomal protein mutations induce autophagy through S6 kinase inhibition of the insulin pathway. PLoS Genet. 2014, 10, e1004371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rosario, F.J.; Powell, T.L.; Gupta, M.B.; Cox, L.; Jansson, T. mTORC1 Transcriptional Regulation of Ribosome Subunits, Protein Synthesis, and Molecular Transport in Primary Human Trophoblast Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 583801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Recasens-Alvarez, C.; Alexandre, C.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Nojima, H.; Huels, D.J.; Snijders, A.P.; Vincent, J.P. Ribosomopathy-associated mutations cause proteotoxic stress that is alleviated by TOR inhibition. Nat. Cell Biol. 2021, 23, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, X.; Chen, J.; Long, X.; Lan, J.; Liu, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, J. RSL1D1 promotes the progression of colorectal cancer through RAN-mediated autophagy suppression. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zinaman, M.J.; Clegg, E.D.; Brown, C.C.; O’Connor, J.; Selevan, S.G. Reprint of: Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2019, 112, e229–e235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xu, H.; Zou, R.; Li, F.; Liu, J.; Luan, N.; Wang, S.; Zhu, L. MRPL15 is a novel prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 3655–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Artero-Castro, A.; Castellvi, J.; García, A.; Hernández, J.; Ramón y Cajal, S.; Lleonart, M.E. Expression of the ribosomal proteins Rplp0, Rplp1, and Rplp2 in gynecologic tumors. Hum. Pathol. 2011, 42, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ribosomal proteins affect reproductive development processes through cell stress, cell proliferation and autophagy.
Figure 1. Ribosomal proteins affect reproductive development processes through cell stress, cell proliferation and autophagy.
Ijms 25 13151 g001
Figure 2. Predicted therapeutic targets of prostate cancer, endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer.
Figure 2. Predicted therapeutic targets of prostate cancer, endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer.
Ijms 25 13151 g002
Table 1. Some ribosomal proteins involved in reproductive and developmental events.
Table 1. Some ribosomal proteins involved in reproductive and developmental events.
Ribosomal ProteinsEvents of Reproductive DevelopmentReferences
RPS3Early embryonic development[30]
RPS6Oocyte development, ovarian cancer, placental function[31,36,37]
MRPL3, MRPL22, MRPL44, MRP18c, MRPS22Gastrulation[32]
RPL10aEmbryonic developmental delay[33]
RPL11Egg formation and development, embryonic mortality[34,38]
RPL14BFertilization[35]
RPS2Egg formation and development[34]
RPS7Embryos developmental anomalies[39]
RPL27aSpermatogonia apoptosis[40]
MRPL24Developmental delays[41]
RPS9MGametogenesis and seed development[42]
RPS15AOvarian cancer[43]
RPL39Trophoblast cell proliferation[44]
RPS14Sertoli cell proliferation[45]
RPL5Breast cancer[46]
RPLP0, RPLP1, RPLP2Breast and ovarian cancer[47]
RPS27LBreast cancer[48]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hong, Y.; Lin, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Zheng, Z. Research Progress of Ribosomal Proteins in Reproductive Development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313151

AMA Style

Hong Y, Lin Q, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zheng Z. Research Progress of Ribosomal Proteins in Reproductive Development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(23):13151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313151

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hong, Yuqi, Qisheng Lin, Yuan Zhang, Jilong Liu, and Zhanhong Zheng. 2024. "Research Progress of Ribosomal Proteins in Reproductive Development" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 23: 13151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313151

APA Style

Hong, Y., Lin, Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Zheng, Z. (2024). Research Progress of Ribosomal Proteins in Reproductive Development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(23), 13151. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252313151

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop