Next Article in Journal
MFG-E8 Reduces Aortic Intimal Proliferation in a Murine Model of Transplant Vasculopathy
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Nutrition: Physiological and Metabolic Responses, Molecular Mechanisms and Chromatin Modifications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/ijms23084093
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of the Wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD Gene Family and an Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Associated with Seed Dormancy and Germination

by
Mingli Liu
,
Zhuofan Wang
,
Chenchen Wang
,
Xu Pan
,
Wei Gao
,
Shengnan Yan
,
Jiajia Cao
,
Jie Lu
,
Cheng Chang
,
Chuanxi Ma
* and
Haiping Zhang
*
State Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Improvement on Southern Yellow & Huai River Valley, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(8), 4093; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084093
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 1 April 2022 / Accepted: 5 April 2022 / Published: 7 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The IQ67 Domain (IQD) gene family plays important roles in plant developmental processes and stress responses. Although IQDs have been characterized in model plants, little is known about their functions in wheat (Triticum aestivum), especially their roles in the regulation of seed dormancy and germination. Here, we identified 73 members of the IQD gene family from the wheat genome and phylogenetically separated them into six major groups. Gene structure and conserved domain analyses suggested that most members of each group had similar structures. A chromosome positional analysis showed that TaIQDs were unevenly located on 18 wheat chromosomes. A synteny analysis indicated that segmental duplications played significant roles in TaIQD expansion, and that the IQD gene family underwent strong purifying selection during evolution. Furthermore, a large number of hormone, light, and abiotic stress response elements were discovered in the promoters of TaIQDs, implying their functional diversity. Microarray data for 50 TaIQDs showed different expression levels in 13 wheat tissues. Transcriptome data and a quantitative real-time PCR analysis of wheat varieties with contrasting seed dormancy and germination phenotypes further revealed that seven genes (TaIQD4/-28/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71) likely participated in seed dormancy and germination through the abscisic acid-signaling pathway. The study results provide valuable information for cloning and a functional investigation of candidate genes controlling wheat seed dormancy and germination; consequently, they increase our understanding of the complex regulatory networks affecting these two traits.

1. Introduction

Seed germination is a key event in the life cycles of all flowering plants that reproduce by seed. It includes several processes, from water absorption to radicle or embryonic protrusion [1]. Seed dormancy is a protective physiological characteristic that delays the timing of germination until the arrival of a favorable season [2]. For crops, dormancy has been gradually eliminated during breeding because it is not conducive to the rapid and uniform emergence of seedlings. Thus, pre-harvest sprouting (PHS, physiologically mature grains germinating in spikes before harvest) caused by dormancy loss occurs frequently in regions with prolonged wet weather during the harvest season, resulting in substantial losses in yield and quality [3]. The average annual loss caused by PHS in wheat (Triticum aestivum) worldwide exceeds USD 1 billion [4]. The PHS rate of rice exceeds 20% under the continuous high-temperature and rainy weather conditions in southern China [5]. Therefore, dormancy and germination are very important for crop production.
Wheat is the third largest cereal crop and is widely grown around the world. It is a staple food of human beings and also an important feed and industrial raw material [6,7]. However, wheat quality and yield are often affected by PHS owing to starch and protein degradation. Seed dormancy and germination are the main genetic factors that determine the PHS resistance level in wheat. Short-dormant wheat varieties are more prone to PHS than long-dormant varieties [8,9]. Therefore, the development of varieties with long periods of dormancy is essential for minimizing PHS damage in regions with prolonged rainy weather during the harvest season. Seed dormancy is jointly controlled by multiple genes; however, at present, only five genes, TaVp1 [10], TaMFT (TaPHS1) [3,11], TaSdr [12,13], TaMKK3-A [14], and TaQsd1 [15], underlying seed dormancy and PHS resistance have been cloned. Therefore, the identification of more novel genes associated with dormancy and germination will be helpful for breeding varieties with long periods of dormancy and high PHS resistance levels using the gene pyramiding method.
Calcium (Ca2+) is an important intracellular second messenger, and Ca2+-binding proteins act as Ca2+ sensors that enable plants to respond to biological processes by instantaneously regulating the Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm [16,17,18,19,20]. Ca2+ sensors in higher plants have been divided into four categories: calmodulins (CaMs), CaM-like proteins, calcineurin B-like proteins, and Ca2+-dependent protein kinases [21,22]. Among them, CaMs are important Ca2+ sensors in Ca2+ signal transduction [23]. They lack enzymatic activities, but they can bind and regulate the activities of CaM binding proteins [24,25]. The IQ67 domain (IQD) protein is a typical representative CaM binding protein that contains a central region of 67 conserved amino acid (aa) residues, named the IQ67 domain [26,27]. The IQ67 domain is precisely separated by three copies of the IQ motif, which are separated by short 11- and 15-aa sequences, respectively. In addition, each IQ pattern partially overlaps with the 1-8-14 and 1-5-10 motifs. The IQ67 domain contains three and four copies of the 1-8-14 and 1-5-10 motifs, respectively. In addition, several conserved hydrophobic and basic amino acid residues are present in these motifs [28,29,30]. These properties enable the IQ67 domain to form a basic amphiphilic helical structure, which establishes the specific functions of these proteins [31,32].
The IQD gene family members have been extensively identified in many plants, including 33 IQDs in Arabidopsis [31], 29 in rice [31], 26 in maize [30], 23 in Brachypodium [32], 29 in moso bamboo [33], 35 in Chinese cabbage [34], 49 in grapevine [35], 23 in potato [36], and 40 in poplar [37]. They can participate in developmental processes and responses to stress or hormonal changes. For example, in Arabidopsis thaliana, AtIQD5, AtIQD14, and AtIQD16 participate in cell morphogenesis through Ca2+ signaling [27,38], and AtIQD22 negatively regulates the accumulation of the plant hormone gibberellin [39]. Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis IQD5 plays a crucial role in responses to drought stress [34]. In Zea mays, the expression levels of 26 ZmIQDs have been shown to be transcriptionally regulated by a 20% polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment [30]. Similarly, 12 Populus trichocarpa IQDs also displayed responses to drought stress after 20% PEG treatment [37]. Notably, the tomato IQD-encoding gene SUN24 positively regulates seed germination by repressing abscisic acid (ABA) signaling [40]. However, the roles of IQD genes in wheat seed dormancy and germination remain unclear.
In the present study, we used bioinformatics methods to identify IQD gene family members in the wheat genome. Additionally, detailed information regarding their phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, conserved motifs, synteny, evolutionary pattern, cis-acting elements, and the subcellular localizations were analyzed. Furthermore, the expression levels of the identified TaIQDs were investigated using a transcriptome analysis and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) to validate their associations with seed dormancy and germination in wheat varieties havwithing contrasting dormancy and germination phenotypes. This study provides a theoretical basis for further dissecting the functions of the IQD genes in controlling wheat seed dormancy and germination.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of IQD Gene Family Members in Wheat

On the basis of the protein functional domain PF00612, redundant forms of the same gene were removed. A total of 73 IQD proteins were identified and renamed TaIQD1–73 in accordance with their physical positions on the 21 wheat chromosomes. The detailed TaIQD gene characteristics, including their chromosomal positions, exon numbers, open reading frame (ORF) lengths, amino acid numbers, isoelectric points (pIs), molecular weights (MWs), instability index values, aliphatic indices (AIs), and grand averages of hydropathicity scores (GRAVYs), are summarized in Table 1. The ORF of the TaIQD genes ranged from 1020 bp (TaIQD10) to 1881 bp (TaIQD38), with predicted proteins of 339–626 aa. Correspondingly, the MWs of these TaIQD proteins ranged from 37,096.08 (TaIQD10) to 69,213.26 Da (TaIQD30). Although the derived TaIQD proteins showed diversity among some parameters, they were remarkably unified in terms of their relatively high pIs (pI > 9.38, with an average of 10.35), a value that is very similar to those of the IQD families in Chinese cabbage (10.05), Brachypodium distachyon (10.3), A. thaliana (10.3), and rice (10.4) [31,32,34]. Instability index calculations predicted that all the IQD proteins were unstable in vitro. The AI results showed that the thermal stabilities of the proteins ranged from 48.27 to 78.18, indicating that the differences in their thermal stability levels were relatively minor. The GRAVY scores for all the IQD proteins were negative, demonstrating that they were hydrophilic.

2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis and Conserved Sequence Alignment

To better clarify the evolutionary relationships between TaIQDs and the IQDs of other plant species, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by comparing identified AtIQD, ZmIQD, and OsIQD protein sequences (Figure 1a). Based on well-established maize IQD family classifications [30] and bootstrap values, the IQD proteins were classified into seven major groups. Among them, group III was the largest, containing 24 (48%) TaIQDs, 11 (22%) ZmIQDs, 8 (16%) OsIQDs, and 7 (14%) AtIQDs, and group VI formed the second largest clade, containing 17 (52%) TaIQDs, 6 (18%) ZmIQDs, 6 (18%) OsIQDs, and 4 (12%) AtIQDs (Figure 1b). The phylogenetic relationships indicated that the wheat IQD proteins were more homologous to IQDs from rice and maize than from Arabidopsis. The IQD gene identifiers from Arabidopsis, rice, and maize are listed in Table S1.
To study the existence and locations of the TaIQD proteins’ conserved domains, we performed a multiple sequence alignment (Figure S1). We found that all the IQD family members contain a highly conserved IQD domain composed of 67 aa. The IQ67 domain was accurately separated by three copies of the IQ motif, IQxxxRGxxxR or (ILV)QxxxRxxxx(R, K), and the IQ motifs were separated by short sequences containing 11-aa residues and 15-aa residues, respectively. In addition, each IQ motif partially overlapped with three copies of the 1-8-14 motif ((FILVW) × 6(FAILVW) × 5(FILVW)) and four copies of the 1-5-10 motif ((FILVW) × 3(FILV) × 4(FILVW)). In addition to these motifs, both sides of each IQ motif were surrounded by hydrophobic and basic amino acid residues, which was consistent with a previous report [31].

2.3. Gene Structure and Motif Composition Analysis

To further investigate the evolutionary relationships among the wheat IQDs, we constructed a second phylogenetic tree using only the full-length TaIQD protein sequences. The IQD proteins were divided into six groups, I–VI, each having 3, 6, 29, 3, 15, and 17 members, respectively (Figure 2a). We identified 10 highly conserved motifs (motifs 1–10) in each IQD protein using MEME (Figure 2b, Table S2). All the IQDs contained motif 1, and most of IQDs contained motifs 3 and 6. These constituted the most highly conserved part of the IQD domain. Interestingly, the motif compositions in the six groups were not exactly the same. For example, in Group III, motifs 1 and 3 existed in each member. However, TaIQD4 and TaIQD28 both contained motifs 6, 7, and 8, whereas TaIQD55 contained motifs 2, 4, and 5. These results showed the conservation and specificity of the gene structures and motif compositions of the TaIQD gene family members. The exon–intron organizational map analysis indicated that different numbers of exons (from 2 to 6) were found in the TaIQDs (Figure 2c). Interestingly, all the Group I members contained two exons, all the Group II members contained six exons, and all the Group IV members contained four exons. The number of introns in each wheat IQD gene ranged from one to five. In total, 21, 20, 14, 14, and 4 genes contained 2, 4, 3, 5, and 1 intron, respectively, indicating the structural diversity of the TaIQDs.

2.4. Analysis of the Chromosomal Locations and Duplications of TaIQD Genes

The 73 TaIQDs were unevenly distributed among the 21 wheat chromosomes, except for chromosomes 6A, 6B, and 6D (Figure 3a). Chromosomes 3A, 3B, and 3D contained the most TaIQD members (8, 10.96%), followed by chromosome 5A (7, 9.59%), chromosomes 1A, 1B, and 1D (6, 8.22%), and chromosome 5B (5, 6.85%). On the whole, 25, 25, and 23 TaIQD genes were detected in the A, B, and D sub-genomes, respectively, implying that no significant variation occurred in the IQD gene abundance on the sub-genome scale. Gene replication is an important mechanism that allows organisms to obtain new genes and create gene novelty [41]. Next, we evaluated the gene duplication events in the wheat IQD gene family. Tandem and segmental duplications are crucial for the evolution of gene families, allowing them to adapt to different environmental conditions. For the TaIQD genes, 111 gene pairs were detected as representing duplications (Figure 3a, Table S3). Interestingly, no tandem duplication events among IQD genes were found. We further analyzed the Ka/Ks values of the duplicated gene pairs in wheat to understand the evolutionary constraints on TaIQD genes. The Ka/Ks ratios were always less than 1 (Figure 3b, Table S3), indicating that the evolution of TaIQD genes was accompanied by intense purifying selection. The Ks values of the TaIQD duplicated gene pairs ranged from 0.0476 to 1.1249, with a concentration near 0.35; therefore, we speculated that the divergence time of the TaIQD gene pairs occurred approximately 26.92 million years ago.

2.5. Micro-Collinearity Analysis

To more thoroughly determine the phylogenetic mechanisms of TaIQD genes, we examined the synteny between wheat and four other gramineous species: Ae. tauschii, Z. mays, T. dicoccoides, and O. sativa. In total, 89, 116, 161, and 99 gene pairs were identified between hexaploid wheat and the other species, respectively (Figure 4a, Table S4). Moreover, the average Ks values were 0.374 (Ta-Aet), 0.693 (Ta-Zm), 0.379 (Ta-Td), and 0.659 (Ta-Os), respectively (Figure 4b, Table S4), indicating that the TaIQD gene family shared closer correlations with A. tauschii and T. dicoccoides than with rice and maize. In addition, the Ka/Ks ratios of all the collinear gene pairs among wheat and the four other gramineous plants were all less than 1, confirming that the evolution of the IQD gene family in wheat underwent a strong purifying selection.

2.6. Analysis of Cis Elements in TaIQD Promoters

To further explore the possible biological functions of the TaIQD genes, the presence of cis-acting elements in the 2 kb upstream promoter regions of the 73 TaIQD genes were predicted using the PlantCARE database (Figure 5, Table S5). The identified cis-acting elements were mainly divided into three major categories: light, hormone, and abiotic stress-related elements. Light-related cis-elements included the TCCC-motif, I-box, GT1-motif, and G-box elements. Hormone-related cis-elements included the TCA-element (salicylic acid), ABA response-related element (ABRE), GARE motif (gibberellic acid), P-box element (gibberellic acid), TATC element (gibberellic acid), TGA element (auxin), AuxRR element (auxin), and TGACG motif (methyl jasmonate). Abiotic stress-related cis-elements included the drought-response (MYB binding site), low-temperature-response (CCGAAA), and the defense- and stress-responsive TC-rich elements. The most common elements in the TaIQD promoters were G-box, TGACG-motif, and ABRE, such as TaIQD28, -58, and -64, respectively. The presence of multiple cis-acting elements in the TaIQD promoters may be indicative of the encoded proteins’ diverse biological functions.

2.7. Expression Profiles of TaIQD Genes in Different Tissues

We obtained expression data for 50 TaIQD genes in 13 tissues related to wheat development from GEO accession number GSE12508 to analyze their expression profiles (Figure 6, Table S6). Overall, most TaIQDs were widely expressed in many tissues. Interestingly, TaIQD28, -32, -58, -64, -69, and -71 were highly expressed in germinated seeds and endosperm, suggesting that they are involved in the processes of seed dormancy and germination. However, TaIQD56 and TaIQD62 were only highly expressed in immature inflorescence and were very lowly expressed elsewhere.

2.8. Expression Pattern Analysis of TaIQDs in the Transcriptome

We also explored the expression patterns of TaIQDs from GEO accession number GSE49821 that has data from JM20 wheat seeds sampled at five successive phases, namely 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after water imbibition, respectively (Figure 7a, Table S7). The expression levels of 15 genes (TaIQD24/-26/-30/-32/-34/-38/-39/-40/-42/-46/-58/-64/-67/-69/-71) increased along with imbibition time, whereas those of 14 genes (TaIQD6/-12/-18/-20/-27/-28/-35/-36/-43/-44/-48/-49/-51/-60) decreased.
To further investigate the expression patterns of TaIQD genes during seed imbibition, two wheat varieties (HMC21 and J411) with contrasting dormancy phenotypes were sampled at different stages of seed imbibition (6, 9, and 12 h) for a transcriptome analysis (Figure 7b, Table S8). Most of the TaIQD genes had significantly different expression levels in HMC21 and J411, except for TaIQD70 and TaIQD73. Additionally, with the extension of seed imbibition time, more TaIQD genes became highly expressed. Particularly, the expression levels of 27 TaIQD genes (TaIQD/-1/-2/-4/-8/-14/-21/-24/-26/-27/-32/-34/-39/-40/-41/-42/-43/-50/-52/-55/-57/-58/-61/-63/-64/-66/-69/-71) in J411, which has a low dormancy level, were always higher than in HMC21, which has a high dormancy level, whereas eight TaIQD genes (TaIQD7/-17/-23/-28/-36/-38/-53/-60) exhibited the opposite pattern.

2.9. TaIQDs Expression Analysis by qRT-PCR

Combining the published JM20 transcriptome data and our own transcriptome data (HMC21 and J411), we identified 15 significantly differentially expressed genes, TaIQD4/-24/-26/-28/-32/-34/-36/-39/-40/-42/-58/-60/-64/-69/-71. To confirm the reliability of the two transcriptome data sets, we used qRT-PCR to further detect the expression levels of the above 15 TaIQD genes in six wheat varieties having contrasting dormancy levels after 0 h and 12 h of seed imbibition (Figure 8). After a 12 h imbibition, seeds from dormant varieties (HMC21, YXM, and YM16) showed no seed germination (average germination rate, 0%), whereas seeds from non-dormant varieties (J411, ZY9507, and ZM895) showed obvious seed germination (average germination rate, 98%). For each TaIQD gene, we also found obvious differences in relative transcript levels among the above six wheat varieties. In particular, TaIQD4/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71 were more highly and consistently transcribed in the three varieties with low dormancy levels than in the three varieties with high dormancy levels. In contrast, TaIQD28 revealed the opposite trend. Briefly, the qRT-PCR data supported the results of the above two transcriptomes.
The ABRE is a major cis-element found in ABA-responsive genes [42,43]. Owing to the presence of the ABRE element in the promoter regions of the above seven genes (TaIQD4/-28/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71) (Figure 5), we further analyzed their responses to exogenous ABA in HMC21 and J411 seeds to determine roles for TaIQDs in ABA-mediated germination. At 24 h after treatment (distilled water was the control treatment), all the HMC21 and J411 seeds treated with distilled water germinated. After the 50 μM ABA treatment, the germination behaviors of HMC21 and J411 seeds were inhibited, and the germination index values decreased to 53% and 82%, respectively, indicating that the sensitivity of seeds from the dormant variety HMC21 to ABA was greater than that of non-dormant J411, which was in accordance with our previous results [9]. In addition, we found that after the ABA treatment, the expression levels of TaIQD4/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71 in HMC21 and J411 were significantly lower than after the distilled water treatment, whereas the expression level of TaIQD28 was significantly higher (Figure 9), indicating that significant differences in ABA sensitivity exist among these seven TaIQD genes. Thus, the differences in ABA responses between dormant and non-dormant varieties may result from the differences among genes, in accordance with Walker-Simmons (1987).

2.10. Subcellular Localization Analysis

To assess the subcellular localizations of the TaIQDs, three fusion vectors were constructed and then transformed independently into rice protoplasts. As shown in Figure 10, TaIQD4-GFP was detected as being localized to cell membranes, whereas both TaIQD58-GFP and TaIQD64-GFP localized to nuclei and cell membranes. The GFP of the empty protein (35S-GFP), as the control group, was dispersed throughout the cell. Similar findings have also been reported for the IQD gene families of grapevine and Chinese cabbage [34,35].

3. Discussion

Plants have evolved many specific gene families to adapt to environmental changes. The IQD genes are a plant-specific family [35]. At present, the complete genome sequence of Chinese Spring wheat enables the comprehensive characterization of important gene families. In the current study, we identified 73 TaIQD genes from the wheat genome and found that there were more TaIQD members than in other plant species (such as Arabidopsis, Zea mays, and O. sativa), which may be attributed to the two rounds of polyploidization that occurred during wheat evolution [44]. Another possibility is that there are a large number of duplication events in the TaIQDs. Gene duplication events are of great significance for the rapid expansion and evolution of plant gene families [45].
Most genes in the same group shared similar gene structures in terms of intron number or exon length. Therefore, we speculated that the IQDs in one branch may have similar functions, which would be similar to the IQDs identified in other plants, such as B. distachyon, maize, and Chinese cabbage [30,32,34]. Furthermore, comparisons of the IQDs’ conserved structural domains revealed the complete IQ67 domain in all the TaIQD genes, suggesting that the IQ67 domain was highly conserved during evolution.
Phylogenetic analyses of plant IQD genes allow the study of their evolutionary history and the estimation of duplication events during the expansion of the IQD gene family. In this study, based on the full-length protein sequence of the TaIQDs, two monocotyledonous plants (maize and rice) and one dicotyledonous plant (Arabidopsis) were used to explore the phylogenetic relationship among IQDs. The 159 IQDs from the four plants were divided into seven groups (I–VII) through phylogenetic analysis. Interestingly, we found that even in different species, the number of IQD members was always the largest in Group III, followed by Group VI, and the number of IQD members was the least in Group I, implying the conservation of IQD genes during evolution. In addition, each group contained at least one gene from wheat, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, indicating that members of different species may have evolved from the same ancestor.
The selection pressure on gene pairs (i.e., positive, purifying, and neutral) provides vital information related to divergence rate [46]. We found that all the duplicated gene pairs in the TaIQD gene family underwent strong purifying selection to remove harmful mutations at the protein level, which may contribute to maintaining their functional stability and explain the lack of divergence during evolution. The similar purifying selection of IQD genes in moso bamboo [33], Chinese cabbage [34], and grapevine [46] has been reported, indicating that the evolution of TaIQD genes was comparable with those of other plants. Additionally, segmental duplications might be the main driving force of TaIQD gene family expansion, consistent with a study of IQD genes in cotton [47].
Multiple cis-acting elements located in gene promoters play crucial roles in signaling [48]. In this study, we identified diverse cis-acting regulatory elements in the promoter regions of TaIQDs, including the G-box, ABRE, TGACG-motif, and MYB-binding site. In particular, the ABRE associated with ABA responsiveness was distributed widely throughout most of the TaIQD genes. ABA sensitivity (or response to ABA) is significantly correlated with seed dormancy and PHS resistance [49,50]. Thus, we speculated that the TaIQDs may be responsive to ABA and be involved in the ABA signaling pathway.
The functions of IQD family genes have also been widely studied. In potato, some StIQDs were expressed in a tissue-specific pattern, so they were closely related to tissue development [36]. In grapevine, 49 VvIQDs were related to the shape of grape berries [35]. IQDs were also found to be involved in abiotic stress response. For example, 12 IQD members were involved in poplar response to methyl jasmonate (MeJA) [37]. In bamboo, three pairs of duplicated genes (PeIQD5-PeIQD26, PeIQD18-PeIQD21 and PeIQD19-PeIQD23) revealed different expression patterns under PEG treatment [33]. In our current study, after the ABA treatment, six genes (TaIQD4/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71) were down-regulated by ABA, whereas TaIQD28 was up-regulated, implying that they may participate in seed dormancy and germination through the ABA signaling pathway. Our results provided basic information for further study of wheat IQD proteins as well as further enriched the functions of the IQD gene family. Bi et al. (2018) reported that overexpression of the tomato IQD-encoding gene SUN24 promotes seed germination, whereas a knockdown of this gene delays germination. Further expression analyses showed that SUN24 promotes seed germination by negatively regulating the expression levels of two key ABA signaling genes: ABA-insensitive 3 and 5. Moreover, the seed germination of the SUN24 overexpression lines was less sensitive to ABA compared with the wild type. In contrast, the RNAi seeds of SUN24 germinate slower than those of the wild type after ABA treatments. Strikingly, an evolutionary analysis showed that TaIQD69 and TaIQD71 were highly homologous to the tomato gene SUN24, supporting that these two genes were likely involved in regulating seed dormancy and germination through the ABA signaling pathway.
In addition to transcription levels, the molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy and germination have been shown at the DNA methylation level [51,52]. Interestingly, the DNA methylome data of ‘MingXian 169’ seeds showed that the methylation levels of the above five genes (TaIQD4/-58/-64/-69/-71) are significantly different between germinated and dormant seeds, with levels in dormant seeds tending to be higher than in germinated seeds [52]. These findings not only provide novel insights into the involvement of epigenetic modifications of IQD genes in regulating seed dormancy and germination, but also demonstrate the complex regulatory mechanisms of seed dormancy and germination through crosstalk among hormones and Ca2+ signaling pathways, as well as DNA methylation. We have learned that the characteristics of seed dormancy and germination determine the resistance of wheat to PHS: wheat varieties with a higher dormancy rate or lower germination rate have higher resistance to PHS. Therefore, mining the PHS resistance candidate genes of TaIQD and solving their regulation mechanism will help to reduce the loss of PHS to wheat yield and quality. In conclusion, our results provided valuable information for further cloning and functional analysis of TaIQD genes and candidate genes to improve PHS resistance in wheat.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of IQD Genes in Wheat

Wheat genomic data were downloaded from Ensembl Plants (https://plants.ensembl.org/info/data/ftp/index.html/ accessed on 24 July 2021). The protein sequences of A. thaliana IQD family members were downloaded from the TAIR database (http://www.Arabidopsis.org/ accessed on 24 July 2021), and the published of IQD protein sequences from Z. mays and Oryza sativa were downloaded from the phytozome website (https://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html/ accessed on 24 July 2021). The IQD protein sequences from Arabidopsis, rice, and maize were used as queries to identify the putative TaIQD proteins in wheat through a local BLASTP program with a significant e-value (<le-5) [53]. After BLASTP, the PFAM database (http://pfam.xfam.org/search/ accessed on 24 July 2021) was used to further verify the presence of the conserved IQ domain PF00612 in the putative IQD protein sequences. Protein sequences with errors or lacking the domain were removed. The confirmed IQD genes were named in accordance with their positions on the wheat chromosomes. Protein physicochemical parameters, such as aliphatic indices (AIs), molecular weights (MWs), and grand averages of hydropathicity (GRAVY), were predicted using the ExPasy website (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/ accessed on 24 July 2021) [54].

4.2. Multiple Sequence Alignments and Phylogenetic Analysis

A multiple sequence alignment of all the identified TaIQD-conserved IQ67 domains was performed and shaded using DNAMAN (Version 6.0) software (http://www.lynnon.com/ accessed on 23 August 2021). The amino acid sequences of TaIQD were used to construct an unrooted phylogenetic tree by the neighbor-joining method in MEGA (Version 6.0) with 1000 bootstrap replicates [55,56]. To determine the relationships of IQDs among different species, their protein sequences from wheat, rice, Arabidopsis, and maize were used to construct a phylogenetic tree by the same methods described above.

4.3. Gene Structure, Conserved Motif, and Cis-Acting Element Analysis

To further understand the exon–intron structural features of TaIQDs, the coding sequences and their corresponding genomic sequences were analyzed using GSDS (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/ accessed on 23 August 2021) [57]. The conserved motifs of the identified TaIQD gene family members were predicted using the MEME online tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme/ accessed on 23 August 2021), with the following parameters: maximum number of 10 motifs and optimum motif widths of 6–50 residues. They were visualized using TBtools (Version 1.098) software [58]. On the basis of the wheat genome annotation, the 2000 bp regions upstream of the transcription start sites in all the verified TaIQD transcripts were extracted as promoters to predict the presence of cis-acting elements using Plant CARE with the default parameters (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/ accessed on 23 August 2021) [59].

4.4. Chromosomal Location and Gene Duplication

The chromosome locational information for wheat genes was downloaded from the Ensembl Plants website (https://plants.ensembl.org/info/data/ftp/index.html/ accessed on 24 July 2021). All the TaIQD gene chromosomal locations were drafted and visualized in Chromosome-Basic Circos by TBtools. The Multiple Collinearity Scan toolkit (MCScanX) (Version 1.098) software was used to analyze gene duplication events within species [60], and the syntenic relationships of IQD genes with four other species (Z. mays, O. sativa, Ae. tauschii, and T. dicoccoides) were drawn using the Dual Systeny Plotter (Version 1.098) software in TBtools (Version 1.098) software (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools/ accessed on 24 July 2021) [61]. TBtools was used to calculate the non-synonymous substitution rate (Ka) to synonymous substitution rate (Ks) ratios [62]. Any Ks values > 2.0 were discarded owing to the risk of substitution saturation [30,63]. Ka/Ks values = 1, <1, and >1 represent neutral, negative (purifying), and positive selection, respectively [45]. Finally, the divergence time of collinear gene pairs (T) was determined as T = Ks/2λ × 10−6 million years ago, where λ = 6.5 × 10−9 [64].

4.5. Expression Pattern Analysis

The expression patterns of the identified TaIQD genes in 13 different tissues were analyzed using data from the GEO accession number GSE12508 on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE12508/ accessed on 24 July 2021). The published transcriptome data of ‘Jimai20’ (JM20) seeds after 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h of water absorption were obtained from the GEO accession number GSE49821 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE49821/ accessed on 24 July 2021).
To study the expression profiles of the 73 TaIQD genes, we collected seeds of ‘Hongmangchun21’ (HMC21) and ‘Jing 411’ (J411) subjected to water imbibition for the first time after 6, 9, and 12 h for transcriptome sequencing. TaIQD genes were obtained from the NetAffx Analysis Center (http://www.affymetrix.com/ accessed on 24 July 2021) to identify corresponding probe sets [9,65]. The FPKM values were log2 with (1+) conversion and displayed as TaIQD tissue specificity, and a heat map was used to reveal expression at different imbibition periods in seeds using TBtools (Version 1.098) software [61].

4.6. Plant Materials and Stress Treatments

Six wheat varieties with contrasting dormancy types were selected to investigate TaIQD expression patterns. Among them, the varieties with strong dormancy were HMC21, ‘Yangxiaomai’ (YXM), and ‘Yangmai16’ (YM16), and the weak dormancy varieties were J411, ‘Zhongyou9507’ (ZY9507), and ‘Zhongmai895’ (ZM895). Next, seeds of non-dormant HMC21 and J411 were treated with 50 μM ABA. Distilled water was used as a control treatment. Seeds were sampled at 24 h after treatment, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C [9]. Three biological replications were performed.

4.7. RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was isolated from frozen HMC21, YXM, YM16, J411, ZY9507, and ZM895 seed samples in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (AG, Changsha, China). The RNA was subsequently treated with DNaseI (AG, Changsha, China) to remove genomic DNA contamination. Upon RNA extraction, the quality and concentration of the RNA were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The RNA was then reverse transcribed into cDNA using a Primer Script RT reagent Kit (AG, Changsha, China). IQD gene-specific primers were designed using Primer software version 5.0 and used for the qRT-PCR analysis, with TaActin as the reference gene. qRT-PCR was conducted on a CFX96 Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Each reaction was conducted in a final volume of 20 µL, which included 10 µL of 2× SYBR Green Pro Taq HS Premix (AG, Changsha, China), 2.0 µL of diluted cDNA template, 0.4 µL of forward/reverse primer (10 μM), and 5.6 µL of ddH2O. The PCR parameters were programmed as follows; 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles at 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s, followed by a melting curve. The relative changes in gene expression were calculated using the 2(−ΔΔCt) method [66]. Each sample was analyzed in three replicates. All the statistical analyses was carried out using GraphPad version 5 [67]. The significance criteria used were * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.

4.8. Subcellular Localization Analysis

The coding sequences of TaIQD4, TaIQD58, and TaIQD64 without the termination codons were cloned independently into the pCAMBIAI1305 vector containing the 35S-driven green fluorescent protein (GFP) sequence promoter. The membrane protein marker OsMCA1 was individually co-transferred into rice protoplasts with 35S-GFP (blank control) and TaIQD4-GFP. The TaIQD58-GFP and TaIQD64-GFP fusion proteins were co-transformed independently into rice protoplasts with the nuclear protein NLS. The transformed protoplasts were cultured in the dark at 22 °C. After 36 h, the GFP fluorescence signals were observed using a LSM710 confocal laser scanning microscope (CarlZeiss, Jena, Germany). The specific primers used, containing restriction sites XbaI and BamHI, are shown in Table S9.

5. Conclusions

We identified 73 TaIQD genes in the wheat genome and subjected them to systematic bioinformatics analyses, including phylogenetic tree construction, gene structure, chromosomal gene distribution, promoter element, and gene collinearity. Subsequently, we performed transcriptome, qRT-PCR, and subcellular localization analyses. The seven genes TaIQD4/-28/-32/-58/-64/-69/-71 were considered as candidate genes associated with seed dormancy and germination. These results will help to further determine the functions of TaIQD genes in regulating seed dormancy and germination, and thus, they have potential application values for the genetic improvement of wheat pre-harvest sprouting resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23084093/s1.

Author Contributions

M.L. conceived and built the main frame of this article and wrote the manuscript; Z.W. and C.W. performed the experiment; X.P. and W.G. processed experimental data; S.Y. and J.C. helped to draw up the manuscript; J.L., C.C., C.M. and H.Z. completed the writing, review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (GXXT-2021-058), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2108085MC98), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Joint Fund Projects, U20A2033), Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production (JCIC-MCP), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-03).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all lab members for their useful suggestions, support, and encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

qRT-PCRquantitative real-time PCR
AIaliphatic indices
MWmolecular weight
GRAVYgrand average of hydropathicity
PIisoelectric point
bpbase pair
aaamino acids
DaDalton
PHSpre-harvest sprouting

References

  1. Nonogaki, H.; Bassel, G.W.; Bewley, J.D. Germination—Still a mystery. Plant Sci. 2010, 179, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Finkelstein, R.; Reeves, W.; Ariizumi, T.; Steber, C. Molecular Aspects of Seed Dormancy. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 387–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Liu, S.; Sehgal, S.K.; Li, J.; Lin, M.; Trick, H.N.; Yu, J.; Gill, B.S.; Bai, G. Cloning and Characterization of a Critical Regulator for Preharvest Sprouting in Wheat. Genetics 2013, 195, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Black, M.; Bewley, J.; Halmer, P. The Encyclopedia of Seeds: Science, Technology and Uses; CABI: Cambridge, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wei, H.U. Characteristics of Pre-harvest Sprouting in Sterile Lines in Hybrid Rice Seeds Production. Acta Agron. Sin. 2003, 29, 441–446. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenchley, R.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Barker, G.L.A.; D’amore, R.; Allen, A.M.; Mckenzie, N.; Kramer, M.; Kerhornou, A.; Bolser, D.; et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 2012, 491, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zhang, P.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, D.; Xu, W.; Yin, J. Screening, Identification, and Optimization of Fermentation Conditions of an Antagonistic Endophyte to Wheat Head Blight. Agronomy 2019, 9, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, S.; Cai, S.; Graybosch, R.; Chen, C.; Bai, G. Quantitative trait loci for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in US hard white winter wheat Rio Blanco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cheng, X.; Cao, J.; Gao, C.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Yao, H.; Xu, K.; Liu, X.; Xu, D.; Pan, X. Identification of the wheat C3H gene family and expression analysis of candidates associated with seed dormancy and germination. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 156, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, Y.; Zhao, X.L.; Xia, L.Q.; Chen, X.M.; Xia, X.C.; Yu, Z.; Röder, Z.H.H. Development and validation of a Viviparous-1 STS marker for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Chinese wheats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 971–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nakamura, S.; Abe, F.; Kawahigashi, H.; Kou, N.; Tagiri, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Utsugi, S.; Ogawa, T.; Handa, H.; Ishida, H. A Wheat Homolog of Mother of FT and TFL1 Acts in the Regulation of Germination. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 3215–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Miao, X.; Xia, X.; He, Z. Cloning of seed dormancy genes (TaSdr) associated with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in common wheat and development of a functional marker. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Xia, X.; He, Z. The seed dormancy allele TaSdr-A1a associated with pre-harvest sprouting tolerance is mainly present in Chinese wheat landraces. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2017, 130, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Torada, A.; Koike, M.; Ogawa, T.; Takenouchi, Y.; Tadamura, K.; Wu, J.; Matsumoto, T.; Kawaura, K.; Ogihara, Y. A Causal Gene for Seed Dormancy on Wheat Chromosome 4A Encodes a MAP Kinase Kinase. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wei, W.; Min, X.; Shan, S.; Jiang, H.; Chang, C. Isolation and characterization of TaQsd1 genes for period of dormancy in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Breed. 2019, 39, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dodd, A.N.; Kudla, J.; Sanders, D. The Language of Calcium Signalling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61, 593–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reddy, A.S.N.; Ali, G.S.; Celesnik, H.; Day, I.S. Coping with Stresses: Roles of Calcium- and Calcium/Calmodulin-Regulated Gene Expression. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 2010–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. White, P.J. Calcium channels in higher plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Nagamune, K.; Xiong, L.; Chini, E.; Sibley, L.D. Plants, endosymbionts and parasites: Abscisic acid and calcium signaling. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2008, 1, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Asano, T.; Hayashi, N.; Kikuchi, S.; Ohsugi, R. CDPK-mediated abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ranty, B.; Aldon, D.; Galaud, J.P. Plant calmodulins and calmodulin-related proteins: Multifaceted relays to decode calcium signals. Plant Signal. Behav. 2006, 1, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Nomura, S. Calcium Signaling in Plant Endosymbiotic Organelles: Mechanism and Role in Physiology. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1094–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Snedden, W.A.; Fromm, H. Calmodulin as a versatile calcium signal transducer in plants. New Phytol. 2010, 151, 35–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. O’Day, D.H. CaMBOT: Profiling and characterizing calmodulin-binding proteins. Cell. Signal. 2003, 15, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. DeFalco, T.A.; Bender, K.W.; Snedden, W.A. Breaking the code: Ca2+ sensors in plant signalling. Biochem. J. 2010, 425, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Abel, S.; Bürstenbinder, K.; Müller, J. The emerging function of IQD proteins as scaffolds in cellular signaling and trafficking. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e24369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bürstenbinder, K.; Möller, B.; Plötner, R.; Stamm, G.; Hause, G.; Mitra, D.; Abel, S. The IQD Family of Calmodulin-Binding Proteins Links Calcium Signaling to Microtubules, Membrane Subdomains, and the Nucleus. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1692–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bahler, M.; Rhoads, A. Calmodulin signaling via the IQ motif. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Choi, J.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Park, C.Y.; Heo, W.D.; Kim, J.C.; Kim, M.C.; Chung, W.S.; Moon, B.C.; Cheong, Y.H.; Kim, C.Y.; et al. Identification of calmodulin isoform-specific binding peptides from a phage-displayed random 22-mer peptide library. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21630–21638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cai, R.H.; Zhang, C.S.; Zhao, Y.; Zhu, K.J.; Wang, Y.F.; Jiang, H.Y.; Xiang, Y.; Cheng, B.J. Genome-wide analysis of the IQD gene family in maize. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2016, 291, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abel, S.; Savchenko, T.; Levy, M. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the IQD gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. BMC Evol. Biol. 2005, 5, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Filiz, E.; Tombuloglu, H.; Ozyigit, I.I. Genome-wide analysis of IQ67 domain (IQD) gene families in Brachypodium distachyon. Plant Omics 2013, 6, 425–432. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, M.; Li, Y.; Chen, D.M.; Liu, H.L.; Zhu, D.Y.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the IQD gene family in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yuan, J.P.; Liu, T.K.; Yu, Z.H.; Li, Y.; Ren, H.B.; Hou, X.L.; Li, Y. Genome-wide analysis of the Chinese cabbage IQD gene family and the response of BrIQD5 in drought resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 603–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, Z.J.; Haider, M.S.; Khan, N.; Fang, J.G. Comprehensive Sequence Analysis of IQD Gene Family and their Expression Profiling in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Genes 2020, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mei, C.; Liu, Y.W.; Dong, X.; Song, Q.N.; Wang, H.J.; Shi, H.W.; Feng, R.Y. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Potato IQD Family during Development and Stress. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 693936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, H.; Feng, L.; Chen, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhao, H.L.; Xiang, Y. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the IQD gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Plant Sci. 2014, 229, 96–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Liang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Martinez, P.; Rasmussen, C.G.; Xu, T.D.; Yang, Z.B. The Microtubule-Associated Protein IQ67 DOMAIN5 Modulates Microtubule Dynamics and Pavement Cell Shape. Plant Physiol. 2018, 177, 1555–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Zentella, R.; Zhang, Z.L.; Park, M.; Thomas, S.G.; Endo, A.; Murase, K.; Fleet, C.M.; Jikumaru, Y.; Nambara, E.; Kamiya, Y.; et al. Global analysis of DELLA direct targets in early gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 3037–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bi, L.L.; Weng, L.; Jiang, Z.Y.; Xiao, H. The tomato IQD gene SUN24 regulates seed germination through ABA signaling pathway. Planta 2018, 248, 919–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Song, S.W.; Hao, L.Y.; Zhao, P.; Xu, Y.; Zhong, N.Q.; Zhang, H.J.; Liu, N. Genome-wide Identification, Expression Profiling and Evolutionary Analysis of Auxin Response Factor Gene Family in Potato (Solanum tuberosum Group Phureja). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holdsworth, M.J.; Bentsink, L.; Soppe, W.J.J. Molecular networks regulating Arabidopsis seed maturation, after-ripening, dormancy and germination. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 33–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Fujita, Y.; Fujita, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res. 2011, 124, 509–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Marcussen, T.; Sandve, S.R.; Heier, L.; Spannagl, M.; Pfeifer, M.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Wulff, B.B.H.; Steuernagel, B.; Mayer, K.F.X.; Olsen, O.A.; et al. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science 2014, 345, 1250092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cannon, S.B.; Mitra, A.; Baumgarten, A.; Young, N.D.; May, G. The roles of segmental and tandem gene duplication in the evolution of large gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Khan, N.; Fatima, F.; Haider, M.S.; Shazadee, H.; Liu, Z.J.; Zheng, T.; Fang, J.G. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiling of the Polygalacturonase (PG) and Pectin Methylesterase (PME) Genes in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Rehman, A.; Peng, Z.; Li, H.G.; Qin, G.Y.; Jia, Y.H.; Pan, Z.; He, S.P.; Qayyum, A.; Du, X.M. Genome wide analysis of IQD gene family in diploid and tetraploid species of cotton (Gossypium spp.). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 1035–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Huang, B.; Huang, Z.; Ma, R.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Yrjl, K. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of LBD transcription factor genes in Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Walker-Simmons, M. ABA Levels and Sensitivity in Developing Wheat Embryos of Sprouting Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars. Plant Physiol. 1987, 84, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. He, H.Z.; Vidigal, D.D.; Snoek, L.B.; Schnabel, S.; Nijveen, H.; Hilhorst, H.; Bentsink, L. Interaction between parental environment and genotype affects plant and seed performance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 6603–6615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zheng, J.; Chen, F.Y.; Wang, Z.; Cao, H.; Li, X.Y.; Deng, X.; Soppe, W.J.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.X. A novel role for histone methyltransferase KYP/SUVH4 in the control of Arabidopsis primary seed dormancy. New Phytol. 2012, 193, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, M.T.; Cui, G.B.; Bai, X.C.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, S.M.; Xie, K.L.; Sun, F.L.; Zhang, C.; Xi, Y.J. Regulatory Network of Preharvest Sprouting Resistance Revealed by Integrative Analysis of mRNA, Noncoding RNA, and DNA Methylation in Wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2021, 69, 4018–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, T.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Wang, X.; Ma, L. Genome-wide identification, phylogeny and expression analysis of the SPL gene family in wheat. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Artimo, P.; Jonnalagedda, M.; Arnold, K.; Baratin, D.; Csardi, G.; de Castro, E.; Duvaud, S.; Flegel, V.; Fortier, A.; Gasteiger, E.; et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, W597–W603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Tamura, K.; Stecher, G.; Peterson, D.; Filipski, A.; Kumar, S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013, 30, 2725–2729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Hu, B.; Jin, J.P.; Guo, A.Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.C.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bailey, T.L.; Johnson, J.; Grant, C.E.; Noble, W.S. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, W39–W49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lescot, M.; Dehais, P.; Thijs, G.; Marchal, K.; Moreau, Y.; Van de Peer, Y.; Rouze, P.; Rombauts, S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 325–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.P.; Tang, H.B.; DeBarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.P.; Wang, X.Y.; Lee, T.H.; Jin, H.Z.; Marler, B.; Guo, H.; et al. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, C.J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.H.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1194–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gao, Y.M.; Liu, H.L.; Zhang, K.M.; Li, F.; Wu, M.; Xiang, Y. A moso bamboo transcription factor, Phehdz1, positively regulates the drought stress response of transgenic rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Blanc, G.; Wolfe, K.H. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1667–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Han, G.M.; Zhu, S.W. Systematic analysis of maize class III peroxidase gene family reveals a conserved subfamily involved in abiotic stress response. Gene 2015, 566, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Wilkins, O.; Nahal, H.; Foong, J.; Provart, N.J.; Campbell, M.M. Expansion and Diversification of the Populus R2R3-MYB Family of Transcription Factors. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Bryfczynski, S.; Pargas, R.P. GraphPad: A Graph Creation Tool for CS2/CS7. SIGCSE Bull. 2009, 41, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 04093 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis and distribution of IQ67 domain (IQD) proteins from wheat, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. The number of bootstrap values was 1000 replicates. (b) Statistics for IQD genes in each group from wheat, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis and distribution of IQ67 domain (IQD) proteins from wheat, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. The number of bootstrap values was 1000 replicates. (b) Statistics for IQD genes in each group from wheat, Arabidopsis, rice, and maize.
Ijms 23 04093 g001
Ijms 23 04093 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and conserved motifs among the 73 TaIQDs. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the full-length sequences of TaIQD proteins using MEGA6.0 software. (b) The motif compositions of the TaIQD proteins. Schematic representations of the 10 conserved motifs in the TaIQD proteins. The motifs, numbered 1–10, are indicated by different colored boxes. (c) Exon–intron structures of the TaIQD genes. Yellow boxes represent exons, grey lines indicate introns, and blue boxes represent untranslated 5′ and 3′ regions.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, and conserved motifs among the 73 TaIQDs. (a) The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the full-length sequences of TaIQD proteins using MEGA6.0 software. (b) The motif compositions of the TaIQD proteins. Schematic representations of the 10 conserved motifs in the TaIQD proteins. The motifs, numbered 1–10, are indicated by different colored boxes. (c) Exon–intron structures of the TaIQD genes. Yellow boxes represent exons, grey lines indicate introns, and blue boxes represent untranslated 5′ and 3′ regions.
Ijms 23 04093 g002
Ijms 23 04093 g003 550
Figure 3. Chromosomal locations and gene duplications of TaIQD genes. (a) Chromosomal localizations of the TaIQDs. Different wheat chromosomes are presented in different colors. The blue lines indicate duplicated IQD gene pairs. The chromosome number is displayed next to each chromosome. (b) The Ka and Ks distributions of 111 duplicated gene pairs exhibited in a scatterplot.
Figure 3. Chromosomal locations and gene duplications of TaIQD genes. (a) Chromosomal localizations of the TaIQDs. Different wheat chromosomes are presented in different colors. The blue lines indicate duplicated IQD gene pairs. The chromosome number is displayed next to each chromosome. (b) The Ka and Ks distributions of 111 duplicated gene pairs exhibited in a scatterplot.
Ijms 23 04093 g003
Ijms 23 04093 g004 550
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of TaIQD genes between T. aestivum and four other plant species (Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Aegilops tauschii, and Triticum dicoccoides). (a) Grey lines in the background and blue lines between different species indicate the collinear blocks and syntenic IQD pairs between wheat and other species, respectively. (b) The scatter plot shows the Ka and Ks distributions of homologous pairs between wheat and the different species.
Figure 4. Synteny analysis of TaIQD genes between T. aestivum and four other plant species (Zea mays, Oryza sativa, Aegilops tauschii, and Triticum dicoccoides). (a) Grey lines in the background and blue lines between different species indicate the collinear blocks and syntenic IQD pairs between wheat and other species, respectively. (b) The scatter plot shows the Ka and Ks distributions of homologous pairs between wheat and the different species.
Ijms 23 04093 g004
Ijms 23 04093 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of TaIQD genes. (a) The different colors and numbers of the grid indicated the numbers of different promoter elements in these IQD genes. (b) The different colored histogram represented the sum of the cis-acting elements in each category.
Figure 5. Analysis of cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of TaIQD genes. (a) The different colors and numbers of the grid indicated the numbers of different promoter elements in these IQD genes. (b) The different colored histogram represented the sum of the cis-acting elements in each category.
Ijms 23 04093 g005
Ijms 23 04093 g006 550
Figure 6. Expression profiles of TaIQD genes in different tissues and at different developmental stages. The heat map shows hierarchical clustering of the 50 TaIQD genes among different tissues. Abbreviations represent specific developmental stages: GSC, germinating seed, coleoptile; GSR, germinating seed, root; GSE, germinating seed, embryo; SR, seedling, root; SC, seedling, crown; SL, seedling, leaf; II, immature inflorescence; FBA, floral bracts, before anthesis; PBA, pistil, before anthesis; Aba, anthers, before anthesis; 3–5 DAP C, 3–5 DAP caryopsis; 22 DAP EM, 22 DAP embryo; 22 DAP EN, 22 DAP endosperm.
Figure 6. Expression profiles of TaIQD genes in different tissues and at different developmental stages. The heat map shows hierarchical clustering of the 50 TaIQD genes among different tissues. Abbreviations represent specific developmental stages: GSC, germinating seed, coleoptile; GSR, germinating seed, root; GSE, germinating seed, embryo; SR, seedling, root; SC, seedling, crown; SL, seedling, leaf; II, immature inflorescence; FBA, floral bracts, before anthesis; PBA, pistil, before anthesis; Aba, anthers, before anthesis; 3–5 DAP C, 3–5 DAP caryopsis; 22 DAP EM, 22 DAP embryo; 22 DAP EN, 22 DAP endosperm.
Ijms 23 04093 g006
Ijms 23 04093 g007 550
Figure 7. Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of TaIQDs from different databases. (a) GSE49821. Abbreviations represent ‘Jimai20’ (JM20) germinating seed imbibition times: 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. (b) Imbibition times of ‘Hongmangchun21’ (HMC21)- and ‘Jing411’ (J411)-germinated seeds: 6, 9, and 12 h.
Figure 7. Heat map showing the hierarchical clustering of TaIQDs from different databases. (a) GSE49821. Abbreviations represent ‘Jimai20’ (JM20) germinating seed imbibition times: 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. (b) Imbibition times of ‘Hongmangchun21’ (HMC21)- and ‘Jing411’ (J411)-germinated seeds: 6, 9, and 12 h.
Ijms 23 04093 g007
Ijms 23 04093 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression patterns of 15 TaIQDs during seed imbibition in six wheat varieties with contrasting seed dormancy phenotypes. Red indicates weak-dormancy varieties, and blue indicates strong-dormancy variety. Y axes represent the scales of the relative expression levels. Bars represent the standard deviations (SDs) of three biological replicates. The significance criteria used were * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Expression patterns of 15 TaIQDs during seed imbibition in six wheat varieties with contrasting seed dormancy phenotypes. Red indicates weak-dormancy varieties, and blue indicates strong-dormancy variety. Y axes represent the scales of the relative expression levels. Bars represent the standard deviations (SDs) of three biological replicates. The significance criteria used were * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 04093 g008
Ijms 23 04093 g009 550
Figure 9. Expression patterns of seven TaIQD genes after 50-μM ABA treatment in wheat varieties ‘Hongmangchun21’ (HMC21) and ‘Jing411’ (J411). Red indicates weak-dormancy varieties, and blue indicates strong-dormancy varieties. Y axes represent the scales of the relative expression levels. Bars represent the standard deviations (SDs) of three biological replicates. The significance criteria used were ** p < 0.01.
Figure 9. Expression patterns of seven TaIQD genes after 50-μM ABA treatment in wheat varieties ‘Hongmangchun21’ (HMC21) and ‘Jing411’ (J411). Red indicates weak-dormancy varieties, and blue indicates strong-dormancy varieties. Y axes represent the scales of the relative expression levels. Bars represent the standard deviations (SDs) of three biological replicates. The significance criteria used were ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 23 04093 g009
Ijms 23 04093 g010 550
Figure 10. Subcellular localizations of TaIQD4, TaIQD58, and TaIQD64 in rice protoplasts. Scale bars = 10 μm. 35S::GFP was used as the empty control.
Figure 10. Subcellular localizations of TaIQD4, TaIQD58, and TaIQD64 in rice protoplasts. Scale bars = 10 μm. 35S::GFP was used as the empty control.
Ijms 23 04093 g010
Table
Table 1. Detailed information of the 73 predicted IQ67 domain (IQD) proteins in Triticum aestivum.
Table 1. Detailed information of the 73 predicted IQ67 domain (IQD) proteins in Triticum aestivum.
NameGene IDLocationOpen Reading Frame Length (bp)Size (Amino Acid)Molecular Weight (Da)Isoelectric PointsExonsInstability IndexAliphatic IndicesGrand Averages of Hydropathicity
TaIQD1TraesCS1A02G064100Chr1A:45793606-45797826144348052,361.5410.155Unstable71.17−0.71
TaIQD2TraesCS1A02G122900Chr1A:140960645-14096280125741844,891.9510.463Unstable65.67−0.47
TaIQD3TraesCS1A02G288100Chr1A:485337870-48534035156652156,328.2510.555Unstable48.27−0.938
TaIQD4TraesCS1A02G341900Chr1A:531281089-53128394105034937,937.1710.663Unstable65.56−0.672
TaIQD5TraesCS1A02G357500Chr1A:540047888-54005224174057964,209.329.756Unstable66.94−0.816
TaIQD6TraesCS1A02G362400Chr1A:543060516-54306349123040944,715.0910.714Unstable61.69−0.721
TaIQD7TraesCS1B02G082100Chr1B:65547252-65551108144348052,439.5310.075Unstable68.71−0.746
TaIQD8TraesCS1B02G142100Chr1B:190629188-19063230125741844,925.9210.463Unstable64.5−0.488
TaIQD9TraesCS1B02G297500Chr1B:517901878-51790443158752856,591.6110.635Unstable52.27−0.863
TaIQD10TraesCS1B02G354600Chr1B:584324452-58432711102033937,096.0810.953Unstable64.07−0.755
TaIQD11TraesCS1B02G374100Chr1B:604548650-60455366174057963,871.939.566Unstable68−0.778
TaIQD12TraesCS1B02G379600Chr1B:612863317-61286629125141645,415.8410.664Unstable61.35−0.736
TaIQD13TraesCS1D02G064700Chr1D:46181934-46185754143747852,189.310.075Unstable69.44−0.726
TaIQD14TraesCS1D02G123800Chr1D:126471856-12647475125741844,775.7510.463Unstable64.98−0.484
TaIQD15TraesCS1D02G287100Chr1D:385615809-38561783159052956,884.8410.545Unstable51.1−0.914
TaIQD16TraesCS1D02G344200Chr1D:432807534-43280947104134637,654.8510.883Unstable64.45−0.703
TaIQD17TraesCS1D02G361800Chr1D:444361818-44436669174057964,058.139.696Unstable67.13−0.805
TaIQD18TraesCS1D02G367300Chr1D:447254643-44725776135645149,366.4010.423Unstable65.23−0.623
TaIQD19TraesCS2A02G470100Chr2A:712980746-71298308130543447,480.5410.084Unstable61.59−0.658
TaIQD20TraesCS2B02G418900Chr2B:600440674-60044316138346049,548.5110.554Unstable51.78−0.78
TaIQD21TraesCS2B02G492900Chr2B:690907263-69090953131143647,526.5010.204Unstable58.85−0.663
TaIQD22TraesCS2D02G398300Chr2D:511437009-51143961138946249,645.6510.564Unstable53.7−0.747
TaIQD23TraesCS2D02G470000Chr2D:574631280-57463349131443747,638.7810.224Unstable60.07−0.655
TaIQD24TraesCS3A02G105600Chr3A:69504313-69506901131743847,911.6810.565Unstable70.75−0.609
TaIQD25TraesCS3A02G108100Chr3A:73512378-73514437140446749,931.3910.163Unstable64.84−0.518
TaIQD26TraesCS3A02G244100Chr3A:457460875-45746634164754860,598.789.786Unstable75.88−0.694
TaIQD27TraesCS3A02G251400Chr3A:471278391-47128089129643147,074.5510.714Unstable62.09−0.741
TaIQD28TraesCS3A02G275900Chr3A:505523600-50552617112537441,766.5910.813Unstable61.5−0.794
TaIQD29TraesCS3A02G352500Chr3A:600339974-60034378150049955,768.2810.275Unstable61.86−0.833
TaIQD30TraesCS3A02G398900Chr3A:645637395-64564125187262369,213.2611.354Unstable50.14−0.906
TaIQD31TraesCS3A02G538100Chr3A:749341062-74934558159653156,655.6810.235Unstable64.29−0.645
TaIQD32TraesCS3B02G124000Chr3B:97076190-97078793130543447,645.2810.565Unstable70.05−0.65
TaIQD33TraesCS3B02G127100Chr3B:104970381-10497248139246349,945.4610.173Unstable64.73−0.541
TaIQD34TraesCS3B02G276000Chr3B:445602528-44560775164754860,603.819.856Unstable78.18−0.692
TaIQD35TraesCS3B02G280900Chr3B:451530157-45153259129343046,916.4310.654Unstable63.37−0.718
TaIQD36TraesCS3B02G309600Chr3B:498325074-49832768113437742,099.9911.003Unstable63.58−0.78
TaIQD37TraesCS3B02G385100Chr3B:605267059-60527119150049955,811.3110.275Unstable61.86−0.832
TaIQD38TraesCS3B02G431200Chr3B:670023177-67002686188162669,491.6511.414Unstable49.44−0.907
TaIQD39TraesCS3B02G603500Chr3B:822903185-82290786158152656,241.1010.315Unstable64.35−0.671
TaIQD40TraesCS3D02G107700Chr3D:61311367-61314011130843547,677.3810.565Unstable69.89−0.632
TaIQD41TraesCS3D02G109900Chr3D:63778901-63780895138646149,561.0510.243Unstable65.86−0.508
TaIQD42TraesCS3D02G247300Chr3D:346354612-34636037164754860,756.979.846Unstable75.33−0.734
TaIQD43TraesCS3D02G251800Chr3D:352612821-35261524133244348,523.3210.684Unstable63.27−0.728
TaIQD44TraesCS3D02G275900Chr3D:382629319-38263211114338042,344.2810.943Unstable63.87−0.766
TaIQD45TraesCS3D02G346500Chr3D:457554464-45755872150049955,768.2810.275Unstable62.06−0.829
TaIQD46TraesCS3D02G392900Chr3D:508079513-50808400186962269,151.2411.354Unstable50.39−0.899
TaIQD47TraesCS3D02G543500Chr3D:613703281-61370752149149653,101.6310.145Unstable61.96−0.702
TaIQD48TraesCS4A02G028700Chr4A:21051778-21053883136845548,711.5311.154Unstable58.31−0.647
TaIQD49TraesCS4B02G277100Chr4B:558725978-55872825144948252,255.7811.163Unstable63.94−0.547
TaIQD50TraesCS4B02G330700Chr4B:621671148-62167343119139640,618.6311.332Unstable72.5−0.2
TaIQD51TraesCS4D02G275700Chr4D:446651522-44665391145248352,450.8911.243Unstable62.57−0.606
TaIQD52TraesCS4D02G327500Chr4D:486907798-48690946119439740,630.7711.472Unstable70.88−0.206
TaIQD53TraesCS5A02G029600Chr5A:25698699-25704674130543446,543.0010.256Unstable60.88−0.961
TaIQD54TraesCS5A02G055100Chr5A:51736382-51738258120940242,506.4810.862Unstable58.81−0.65
TaIQD55TraesCS5A02G163000Chr5A:348717683-34872122140146651,850.8310.255Unstable65.9−0.7
TaIQD56TraesCS5A02G373000Chr5A:571149994-57115556131143647,752.339.696Unstable67.43−0.869
TaIQD57TraesCS5A02G377500Chr5A:574931819-57493400138946249,373.6710.333Unstable62.97−0.513
TaIQD58TraesCS5A02G425800Chr5A:611132861-61113757129343047,774.7110.006Unstable68.81−0.805
TaIQD59TraesCS5A02G502100Chr5A:667123853-66712542115538439,565.3011.392Unstable71.69−0.267
TaIQD60TraesCS5B02G028200Chr5B:27294672-27299651133244347,698.2310.026Unstable60.47−0.953
TaIQD61TraesCS5B02G160400Chr5B:295380499-29538350140146650,900.0010.725Unstable64.87−0.649
TaIQD62TraesCS5B02G375000Chr5B:552482573-55248837131143648,004.649.646Unstable68.33−0.855
TaIQD63TraesCS5B02G381100Chr5B:558870075-55887241138946249,424.7610.443Unstable62.34−0.525
TaIQD64TraesCS5B02G427800Chr5B:603883827-60388805129343047,671.639.896Unstable70.44−0.817
TaIQD65TraesCS5D02G037300Chr5D:36476089-36482142129343046,336.8410.176Unstable62.56−0.955
TaIQD66TraesCS5D02G168000Chr5D:262838385-26284284141347052,167.0610.165Unstable65.74−0.704
TaIQD67TraesCS5D02G382500Chr5D:452235938-45224129131743848,184.859.726Unstable65.8−0.896
TaIQD68TraesCS5D02G387500Chr5D:457006913-45700916139246349,554.1010.473Unstable63.05−0.506
TaIQD69TraesCS7A02G317400Chr7A:457568641-45757125163554459,224.9310.735Unstable54.56−0.787
TaIQD70TraesCS7A02G332500Chr7A:485743582-48574631133244348,287.9210.414Unstable58.8−0.729
TaIQD71TraesCS7B02G218800Chr7B:408567032-40856977163854559,385.1010.785Unstable54.46−0.799
TaIQD72TraesCS7B02G244900Chr7B:453334625-45333772133244348,516.2610.44Unstable59.23−0.757
TaIQD73TraesCS7D02G341000Chr7D:436877993-43688133133244348,511.2310.554Unstable58.13−0.774
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Pan, X.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Cao, J.; Lu, J.; Chang, C.; Ma, C.; et al. Identification of the Wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD Gene Family and an Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Associated with Seed Dormancy and Germination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084093

AMA Style

Liu M, Wang Z, Wang C, Pan X, Gao W, Yan S, Cao J, Lu J, Chang C, Ma C, et al. Identification of the Wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD Gene Family and an Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Associated with Seed Dormancy and Germination. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(8):4093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Mingli, Zhuofan Wang, Chenchen Wang, Xu Pan, Wei Gao, Shengnan Yan, Jiajia Cao, Jie Lu, Cheng Chang, Chuanxi Ma, and et al. 2022. "Identification of the Wheat (Triticum aestivum) IQD Gene Family and an Expression Analysis of Candidate Genes Associated with Seed Dormancy and Germination" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 8: 4093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop