Next Article in Journal
Photothermal Effect and Multi-Modality Imaging of Up-Conversion Nanomaterial Doped with Gold Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Differential Expression of Serum Extracellular Vesicle miRNAs in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease-Stage Specificity and Relevance to Pathophysiology
Previous Article in Journal
Genomic and Non-Genomic Regulatory Mechanisms of the Cardiac Sodium Channel in Cardiac Arrhythmias
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small Extracellular Vesicles from Human Amniotic Fluid Samples as Promising Theranostics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms23031379
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Progression of Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Applications

by
Li-Chun Chang
1,2,
Han-Mo Chiu
1,2,
Ming-Shiang Wu
1 and
Tang-Long Shen
3,4,5,*
1
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
2
Health Management Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
3
Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
4
Center for Biotechnology, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
5
Genome and Systems Biology Degree Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1379; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031379
Submission received: 2 January 2022 / Revised: 17 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Exosomes in Health and Disease)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and a longstanding critical challenge for public health. Screening has been suggested to effectively reduce both the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, the drawback of the current screening modalities, both stool-based tests and colonoscopies, is limited screening adherence, which reduces the effectiveness of CRC screening. Blood tests are more acceptable than stool tests or colonoscopy as a first-line screening approach. Therefore, identifying blood biomarkers for detecting CRC and its precancerous neoplasms is urgently needed to fulfill the unmet clinical need. Currently, many kinds of blood contents, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor nucleic acids, and extracellular vesicles, have been investigated as biomarkers for CRC detection. Among these, small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) have been demonstrated to detect CRC effectively in recent reports. sEVs enable intercellular shuttling—for instance, trafficking between recipient cancer cells and stromal cells—which can affect tumor initiation, proliferation, angiogenesis, immune regulation; metastasis, the cancer-specific molecules, such as proteins, microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, and circular RNAs, loaded into cancer-derived sEVs may serve as biomarkers for the detection of cancers, including CRC. Indeed, accumulating evidence has shown that nucleic acids and proteins contained in CRC-derived sEVs are effective as blood biomarkers for CRC detection. However, investigations of the performance of sEVs for diagnosing CRC in clinical trials remains limited. Thus, the effectiveness of sEV biomarkers for diagnosing CRC needs further validation in clinical trials.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. To face the challenge posed by the current CRC prevalence, nationwide screening programs have been implemented worldwide. Structural screening has been proven effective in reducing the incidence and mortality of CRC [1,2]. The current modalities for CRC screening can be divided into the following two major categories: stool-based and direct visualization tests. Stool-based tests include fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), guaiac fecal occult blood tests, and stool DNA tests. On the other hand, direct visualization tests include colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and computed tomography colonoscopy. However, both stool-based and direct visualization tests have the drawback of limited screening adherence. Approximately one-third of eligible subjects aged 50 to 75 years have never been screened for CRC, and half are inadequately screened [3]. Thus, it becomes critical to increase adherence and subsequent improvements in the effectiveness of CRC screening. Accordingly, blood tests could increase participation by 6.5% participation compared with FITs for CRC screening [4]. Not surprisingly, there is a preference for blood-based screening to enhance the suboptimal acceptance of either colonoscopy or stool-based tests due to the desire for convenience, inexpensiveness and social etiquette, highlighting the need for and potential merit of developing highly robust blood-based tests for CRC detection.
Cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) is an attractive complementary tool for CRC diagnosis. However, the poor sensitivity and specificity of CEA limit its application in the detection of CRC. Accordingly, researchers have made great efforts to identify reliable and accessible biomarkers in the blood for decades, first focusing on circulating tumor cells (CTCs) released from tumors and then on circulating tumor-related nucleic acids (mainly DNA and miRNA). Given that they are vastly outnumbered by other cells, especially white blood cells, CTCs are present in blood in minimal quantities. Thus, their detection requires an isolation/enrichment step before collection. Because of their sparse distribution in blood, the main drawback of CTCs is that their analysis requires extremely sensitive and specific methods and often needs isolation/enrichment [5]. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is DNA released from necrotic tumor cells that then circulates in the peripheral blood [6]. The concentration of ctDNA depends on the type and stage of the tumor, usually increasing in more advanced stages of cancer [7]. Therefore, blood tests using ctDNA are incapable of detecting precancerous lesions and early stage cancers [8,9]. Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) were initially recognized as cellular debris and considered to dispose of cellular components when first discovered and coined “exosomes” in 1983 [10,11]. The molecules contained in sEVs can be shuttled between recipient cancer cells and stromal cells, thereby regulating the tumor microenvironment by modulating various signaling pathways and functions. In the last decade, increasing interest has focused on the participation of circulating sEVs in tumor proliferation, metastasis, angiogenesis, tumor immunity, and drug resistance in the field of cancer biology. On the other hand, cancer-specific molecules, such as proteins, microRNAs (miRNAs), long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), loaded into cancer-derived sEVs may serve as biomarkers for the detection of cancers, including CRC. This review highlights the oncogenic roles of cancer-derived sEVs in CRC carcinogenesis and their clinical applications in CRC diagnosis.

2. Small Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer Communication

sEVs are defined as a specific subset of extracellular vesicles that range from 30 to 150 nm in size. They originate as endosomal-derived intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) that are subsequently released into the extracellular milieu by the fusion of multivesicular endosomes or multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the intracellular side of the plasma membrane. sEV-mediated intercellular communication plays a critical role in cancer development. The selective packaging of oncogenic molecules renders tumor-derived sEVs capable of altering the tumor microenvironment, modulating tumor immunity, and promoting cancer development, undoubtedly contributing to cancer recurrence and drug resistance. Notably, the molecular and functional characteristics of sEVs evolve with cancer progression. Thus, tumor-derived sEVs can provide valuable real-time information to reflect the dynamic changes in cancer progression. Given the unique molecular profiles and signatures, the cargo of tumor-derived sEVs has been highlighted as a useful diagnostic and predictive biomarker [12].
sEVs regulate the molecular and functional communication between cancer cells and their tumor microenvironment during cancer progression [13]. A previous study found that breast cancer cells secreting sEVs containing CXCR4 (CXC motif chemokine receptor 4) exhibited high levels of stemness-related markers and metastasis-related mRNAs, which enhanced their invasive ability and metastatic potential [14]. In addition, adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells secrete sEVs to facilitate cancer migration and proliferation via a pathway independent of the Wnt-β-catenin pathway [15]. In CRC, sEVs derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have been shown to prime cancer stem cells and contribute to chemoresistance through Wnt signaling [16]. These studies indicated the essential role of sEVs in intercellular communication during cancer progression. Tumor-derived sEVs with tumorigenic activity regulate cancer progression through multiple perspectives, including cancer aggressiveness, cancer invasiveness, extracellular matrix remodeling, angiogenesis, drug resistance, and immunosuppression [17,18], suggesting the essential implications of tumor-derived sEVs on cancer development and cancer therapy.

3. Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Proliferation, Invasion, and Migration of CRC Cells

The canonical Wnt-β-catenin pathway is constitutively active during CRC development, and mutations that involve the Wnt signaling cascade are the most prevalent genetic alterations in CRC carcinogenesis [19]. sEVs recruit mutant β-catenin and activate the Wnt signaling pathway, resulting in stimulation of the proliferation and migration of recipient cells [20]. Overexpression of CAF-derived sEV-miR-92a-3p downregulates the expression of its target genes FBXW7 (F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7) and MOAP1 (modulator of apoptosis 1) to inhibit the ubiquitination and degradation of β-catenin, resulting in the invasion and migration of CRC cells via activation of the Wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway [21]. At present, an increasing number of studies are finding that sEV-derived molecules, such as lncRNAs and circRNAs, are involved in specific signaling axes to alter tumor metastasis [22,23,24].

4. Small Extracellular Vesicles and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in CRC

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is considered one of the most crucial mechanisms required for tumor metastasis [25] and is characterized by a loss of epithelial properties and gain of mesenchymal properties. Therefore, the presence of EMT is associated with a poor prognosis [26]. Growing evidence has revealed the relationship between sEVs and EMT. Recent studies have found that tumor-derived sEVs can contribute to the EMT process in recipient cells [27]. sEVs secreted by adherent cells were taken up by metastatic cells, subsequently initiating EMT and metastasis in the recipient cancer cells. A previous study found that the level of miR-210 in sEVs was significantly higher than intracellular level in metastatic cancer cells. The upregulated miRNA-210 in sEVs was suggested to trigger the EMT process, contributing to a metastatic phenotype through a coordinated tumor–tumor microenvironment cascade [28]. Many miRNAs, such as miR-106b-3p, miR-25-3p, miR-130b-3p, and miR-425-5p, may also promote EMT through different pathways [29,30]. Additionally, circRNAs in the sEV might function as competing endogenous RNAs in the regulation of EMT in patients with metastatic CRC.

5. Small Extracellular Vesicles and the Premetastatic Niche of CRC

Compelling evidence indicates that tumor cells influence other organs and tissues before metastasizing. These newly emerging locations are known as premetastatic niches (PMNs). Based on Steven Paget’s “seed-and-soil” theory, the novel concept of the PMN was proposed to elucidate the mechanisms of tumor metastasis from the primary site to the metastatic site [31]. The PMN is a microenvironment in which tumor-derived cytokines, growth factors, immune cells, and sEVs are involved to prepare an optimal site for the seeding and growth of metastatic cancer cells [32].
PMNs possess the following six characteristics to promote metastasis and enable tumor growth: vascular leakiness and angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammation, immunosuppression, genetic reprogramming, and organotropism [33]. sEVs play a vital role in PMN formation and participate in each of the above characteristics (Figure 1). CRC-derived sEVs containing miR-25-3p contribute to the induction of vascular leakiness and angiogenesis by downregulating the expression of the Krüppel-like factor family. Furthermore, sEVs containing miR-25-3p may impair the junctions in the endothelial cell layer, which increases the formation of PMNs and CRC metastases in the liver and lung [34,35]. Lymphangiogenesis is actively involved in the formation of the PMN. CRC-derived sEVs containing IRF-2 (interferon regulatory factor 2) have been postulated to stimulate VEGF-C (vascular endothelial growth factor C) secretion, resulting in lymphangiogenesis and metastasis [36]. Chronic inflammation is a critical driver of tumor progression and metastasis, and thus, the local inflammatory microenvironment is an essential factor contributing to the formation of the PMN. CRC-derived sEVs containing miR-21 help polarize liver macrophages into an IL-6-secreting phenotype by binding to TLR7 (Toll-like receptor 7) in tumor-associated macrophages, contributing to the inflammatory environment [37]. A hallmark of PMN formation is the recruitment of immune cells to establish an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Consistent with this observation, bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) are essential effector cells that suppress the antitumor response and allow primary tumor cells to escape immune defense [38]. Likewise, CRC-derived sEVs containing miR-1246 may result in macrophage polarization into M2 tumor-associated macrophages and subsequently contribute to the recruitment of BMDCs and establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment [39]. Stromal, metabolic, and epigenetic reprogramming contributes to PMN-induced tumor metastasis. Previous studies have demonstrated that sEVs are associated with the recruitment and reprogramming of host stromal cells, such as fibroblasts and epithelial cells, to modify the PMN [40]. Organotropism is defined as the preference of certain tumors to metastasize to specific organs. Tumor-derived sEVs express specific integrins (ITGs), which interact with extracellular matrix molecules to initiate the formation of PMNs in a particular tissue [41]. Integrin α6/integrin β4/integrin β1 and integrin β5/integrin αv are enriched in sEVs with lung and liver tropism, respectively. Expression of the specific integrin contained in sEVs may likewise orchestrate organotropism in CRC [31]. Taken together, recent studies have provided solid evidence to support the vital role of sEVs in the formation of PMNs in CRC, and clarification of the mechanism may offer a window for the early diagnosis and prevention of CRC metastasis.

6. Small Extracellular Vesicles and Immune Regulation in CRC

Cancer-derived sEVs may impair immune cell maturation and antitumor activity, thereby establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment and promoting the immune escape of cancer cells [42]. Cancer cells may present programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) on their surface and then attenuate antitumor immunity by binding the programmed cell death protein-1 receptor on effector T cells. PD-L1+ sEVs were also capable of inhibiting T cell activity in CRC cells, promoting tumor growth, and resisting immune checkpoint protein inhibitors [43]. CD8+ T cells act as antitumor effector cells in the tumor microenvironment, and the dysfunction of CD8+ T cells impairs the immune system against cancer [44]. sEVs containing miR-146a-5p were shown to decrease the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, thereby establishing an immunosuppressive microenvironment in CRC [45].

7. Small Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for Cancer Diagnosis

Given the vast number of molecular cargoes, several studies have shown that each category of sEV cargo in different cancer cell lines and patient blood samples includes many potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, compared with the cargo in their corresponding normal counterparts. In the past, many potential noninvasive biomarkers via blood or urine tests have been developed for cancer detection; many of these biomarkers resided within sEV [46,47]. The enrichment and stability of these sEV biomarkers may achieve better diagnostic performance [48,49,50]. The current position of each sEV cargo as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis is addressed as follows:

7.1. Protein Biomarkers in sEVs

Among versatile molecules in sEVs, proteins are the first component to be investigated. The biological role of the sEV proteome has been disclosed in CRC [35,51,52], bladder cancer [53], prostate cancer [54], pancreatic cancer [55], lung cancer [56], breast cancer [57], hepatoma [58], hematopoietic cancer [59], ovarian cancer [60], and buccal squamous cell carcinoma [61]. sEV proteins from cancer cells affect the tumor microenvironment through suppressive modulation of immune surveillance and immune cells, including NK cells, T cells, and macrophages [62]. Large-scale proteomic analysis of sEVs allowed the discovery of novel markers and signatures across varied tumor types. Moreover, a previous study demonstrated unique proteomic profiles in sEVs across distinct cancer types, including CRC [63]. Further establishment of a reliable and reproducible isolation procedure and analysis protocol will be essential to classify the sEV proteome as a novel modality for cancer diagnosis.

7.2. Noncoding microRNAs in sEVs

miRNAs are the most extensively studied category of short noncoding RNAs because of their profound regulatory function in gene expression. The role of different sEV-derived miRNAs in cancer has been explored in numerous studies [64]. Briefly, sEV-derived miRNAs can control the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of recipient tumor cells. sEV-derived miRNAs mediate widespread communication between tumor cells and various cells in their environment, such as CAFs, immune cells, and endothelial cells. Moreover, drug-resistant tumor cells can transmit the resistance phenotype to drug-sensitive tumor cells through horizontal transfer of sEVs containing miRNAs [65]. Regarding cancer diagnosis, previous systemic reviews have explored the role of sEV-derived miRNAs in detecting non-small-cell lung cancer [66], pancreatic cancer [67], hepatoma [68], lymphoma [69], glioma [70], CRC [71], breast cancer [72] and nasopharyngeal cancer [73] as biomarkers.

7.3. Long Noncoding RNAs in sEVs

sEVs containing long RNAs, ranging from mRNAs, circRNAs to lncRNAs, can also be reliably found and detected in plasma and reflect their tissue origins. A previous study explored whether sEVs containing long RNAs may serve as biomarkers for hepatoma detection [74]. lncRNAs are a subclass of noncoding RNAs more than 200 nucleotides in length that are closely related to the development of many types of cancer. lncRNAs can be packed into sEVs, and tumor cells can secrete specific lncRNAs in sEVs via a yet-unknown mechanism. Dysregulated lncRNAs have been reported to be involved in regulating the proliferation, metastasis, and recurrence of multiple cancers, including gastric cancer [75], CRC [76], lung cancer [77], prostate cancer [78], hepatoma [79], cervical cancer [80], glioma [81], bladder cancer [82], renal cancer [83], cholangiocarcinoma [84] and ovarian cancer [85]. Furthermore, sEV-derived lncRNAs mediate the progression and chemoresistance of tumor cells in the tumor microenvironment in many cancers. Thus, sEV-derived lncRNAs may play a role in cancer diagnosis as biomarkers.

7.4. Circular RNAs in sEVs

CircRNAs exist in eukaryotes and are generated through backsplicing, a specific form of alternative splicing, and they are more stable than linear RNAs. CircRNAs influence cancer cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and chemoresistance, and they work upon sEVs reaching either neighboring or distal cells. A previous study demonstrated that deregulated sEV-derived circRNAs were more highly expressed in subjects with metastatic and localized breast cancer than in healthy controls [86]. Moreover, dysregulated expression of sEV-derived circRNAs was also noted in gastric cancer [87], CRC [88], pancreatic cancer [89], hepatoma [90], cholangiocarcinoma [91], small-cell lung cancer [92], and urogenital cancer [93]. However, the low abundance of circRNAs in sEVs makes their detection challenging. Thus, better quantitative approaches should be established to accurately detect the expression level of sEV-derived circRNAs.
As mentioned above, the diverse cargos in sEVs have demonstrated potential for detecting different cancers. Among the multiple cargos carried by sEVs, it is critical to clarify which molecule is the optimal diagnostic biomarker in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Moreover, it needs to be defined which cancer may benefit from the application of a certain sEV-derived molecule for diagnosis. Wong et al. conducted a meta-analysis to review 30 studies investigating sEV-derived molecules as diagnostic biomarkers [94]. More than half of these studies focused on digestive organ cancers, including four studies in CRC, five studies in liver cancer, four in pancreatobiliary cancer, and four in gastric cancer. A total of 47 diagnostic biomarkers were enrolled in the meta-analysis, and 42.6% of the biomarkers were miRNAs, followed by lncRNAs (36.2%) and proteins (19.1%). Among these biomarkers, sEV-miR-21 was the main biomarker investigated for diagnosing various cancers. Regarding the kind of specimen for collecting sEVs, 61.3% of the sEV molecules were collected from serum, followed by plasma (16.1%), urine (12.9%), saliva (3.2%), and bile (3.2%).
This meta-analysis also explored the sensitivity and specificity of sEV biomarkers for detecting various cancers [94]. The authors focused on CRC (four studies with eleven biomarkers), gastric cancer (four studies with five biomarkers), pancreatic cancer (four studies with eight biomarkers), liver cancer (four studies with seven biomarkers), and prostate cancer (four studies with seven biomarkers). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the pooled sEV-derived biomarkers were 0.57 and 0.87 for detecting CRC, 0.77 and 0.73 for gastric cancer, 0.91 and 0.90 for pancreatic cancer, 0.76 and 0.80 for liver cancer, and 0.77 and 0.79 for prostate cancer, respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of sEVs were optimal and could effectively distinguish cancer patients from their noncancerous counterparts.

8. Application of Small Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers for CRC Detection

sEVs contain molecules that can be incorporated into the development of novel tests for detecting precancerous colorectal neoplasms and cancer, which enable them to be applied in diagnostic tests. Currently, miRNAs are the most commonly investigated molecules in sEVs for CRC detection. In previous studies, the utility of sEV-derived miRNAs has been tested for CRC diagnosis. The serum levels of sEV-derived miRNAs (miR-1229, miR-1224-5p, miR-223, let-7a, miR-150, and miR-21) were significantly higher in CRC patients than in controls, and their positive rates were 22.7%, 31.8%, 46.6%, 50%, 55.7%, and 61.4%, respectively. The false-positive rates of these miRNAs ranged from 0% to 9% [95]. Compared with CEA and CA19-9, which had sensitivities of 30.7% and 16%, respectively, sEV-derived miRNAs exhibited superior performance and might be useful as new diagnostic biomarkers. Moreover, the expression of miR-19a-3, miR-21-5p, and miR-425-5p in sEVs was also higher in serum from subjects with CRC than in that from normal controls; thus, these miRNAs could facilitate CRC detection as biomarkers [96]. In addition to facilitating diagnosis, sEV-derived miRNAs may play a role as prognostic biomarkers in predicting CRC recurrence. The expression of miR-17-92 in sEVs was significantly higher in CRC patients with poor prognosis than in healthy counterparts and thus had been proposed as a biomarker of CRC recurrence [97]. sEVs containing miR-122 are another potential biomarker for predicting the survival outcome of CRC because the elevated expression of miR-122 in sEV is closely associated with the presence of liver metastasis [98].
In addition to miRNAs, lncRNAs are another sEV molecule commonly investigated for CRC diagnosis. The serum level of sEVs containing lncRNA-CCAT2 (colon cancer associated transcript 2) was increased in cancer tissue and serum from CRC patients. The serum level of sEVs containing lncRNA-CCAT2 was higher in advanced CRC and decreased markedly after surgery, thus identifying this lncRNA as a good candidate for monitoring CRC as a biomarker [99]. Moreover, sEVs containing lncRNA-XIST (X-inactive specific transcript) presented convincing performance for CRC detection [100]. CircRNAs are closely associated with the initiation and development of cancers and play a role in CRC detection. Thus, sEVs containing hsa-circ-0004771 originate from the tumor, and their level is significantly increased in the serum of CRC patients, thereby identifying this circRNA as a potential biomarker for the early diagnosis of CRC [101]. The proteins expressed on the surface of sEVs are also promising candidates for CRC detection. Full-length cadherin-17 [102], CD147 [103], cellular prion protein [104], GCLM (glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit), KEL (Kell metallo-endopeptidase), APOF (apolipoprotein F), CFB (complement factor B), PDE5A (phosphodiesterase 5A), and ATIC (5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase/IMP cyclohydrolase) [105] were found to be secreted by specific CRC-derived sEVs and therefore may potentially be biomarkers for diagnosing CRC in the future. Furthermore, it is worth clarifying whether these promising biomarkers, such as miRNAs in combination with surface proteins, may further improve the diagnostic performance and effectiveness of CRC detection.
sEVs, as vehicles of intercellular communication, are increasingly close to being recognized as biomarkers for the diagnosis of CRC. Nucleic acids and proteins contained in CRC-derived sEVs from the blood could potentially be used as biomarkers to diagnose and monitor CRC. Although a growing body of studies have explored the potential of sEV molecules as diagnostic tools, clinical trials that evaluate sEV molecules as biomarkers for CRC detection remain rare. By searching the Clinicaltrial.gov website, accessed on 28 December 2021, several clinical trials have addressed the detection of CRC by sEVs. Clinical trials conducted in China and France have investigated changes in sEV molecules before and after concurrent chemoradiation therapies for rectal cancer (NCT03874559 and NCT04227886). Two clinical trials evaluated the performance of sEV proteins and miRNAs for the early diagnosis of CRC (NCT04394572 and NCT04523389, respectively). The results of these trials will help clarify the performance of sEVs for the early diagnosis and prediction of treatment response in CRC. To date, no clinical trial has investigated the effectiveness of blood tests with sEV molecules for screening purposes, and further study of this issue is warranted.

9. Conclusions

The survival outcome of CRC largely depends on the cancer stage at diagnosis, and early diagnosis markedly improves prognosis and survival. Effective screening reduces CRC mortality by detecting cancer at an asymptomatic and early stage. However, the attendance rate is one of the most critical factors in accomplishing the CRC screening program. Both stool-based and primary colonoscopy screening program have the limitation of not being broadly accepted by the participants. Undoubtedly, a blood test is the most acceptable approach for screening and has the potential to increase screening attendance, thus reducing CRC mortality. Blood tests diagnose CRC by detecting CTCs, ctDNA, circulating RNA, sEVs, and so on. Among these molecules, sEVs are tightly associated with each stage of CRC progression, including initiation, proliferation, and metastasis, thereby providing a window to detect CRC at not only the advanced stage but also the precancerous stage. Because of their stability and feasibility for enrichment, molecules contained in sEVs are potential candidates for the development of diagnostic biomarkers. A growing number of studies have explored the diagnostic performance of sEV molecules for CRC detection. However, some challenges and difficulties related to sEVs should not be ignored. A growing number of sEV biomarkers have been identified to be specific to CRC and may be used as biomarkers to detect CRC. However, clinical trials that investigate the diagnostic performance of sEVs for CRC remain very rare. Moreover, the actual performance of sEVs for detecting colorectal neoplasias, including precancerous neoplasms and invasive cancers, in a screening setting remains unknown. Investigation of the performance of sEVs in the blood as a screening test is warranted in the future. The method of isolation and characterization of sEV varies in different studies, and standardization of these processes is critical to make the experimental results reproducible. Some non-sEV components, such as albumin, immune complexes, and platelets, may be coisolated with sEVs, which may interfere with interpreting the information from sEVs. Optimization of the isolation method is necessary to overcome this limitation. sEVs exist in many kinds of body fluids, such as blood, urine, bile, saliva, stool, and ascites. Each body fluid is supposed to play a different role in detecting various cancers. For example, sEVs in stool, bile, and saliva may potentially be used to detect CRC, bile duct cancer, and oropharyngeal/esophageal cancer, respectively. This is an exciting issue and worthy of clarification in the future. Finally, quantification of sEVs is essential to establish a cutoff for diagnosis. However, the methods for sEV quantification remain imperfect and need further improvement. The substantial implication of sEVs in each stage of CRC development has already been proven. However, the applications of sEVs as biomarkers for early diagnosis, screening, monitoring, and even predicting CRC remain immature and need to be investigated in clinical trials.

Author Contributions

Conception and design of the study: T.-L.S. and M.-S.W.; generation, collection, assembly, analysis, and/or interpretation of data: H.-M.C. and M.-S.W.; drafting and revision of the manuscript: L.-C.C. and T.-L.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (109-2314-B-002-085 to L.-C. Chang; 110-2321-B-002-014 to M.-S. Wu; 105-2320-B-002-058-MY3 to T.-L. Shen).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Eighth Core Lab, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, for support during the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CRCcolorectal cancer
FITfecal immunochemical test
CEAcancer embryonic antigen
CTCcirculating tumor cell
ctDNAcirculating tumor DNA
sEVsmall extracellular vesicle
miRNAmicroRNA
lncRNAlong non-coding RNA
circRNAcircular RNA
CAFcancer-associated fibroblast
EMTepithelial-mesenchymal transition
PMNpre-metastatic niche
BMDCbone marrow-derived dendritic cell
ITGintegrin

References

  1. Doubeni, C.A.; Corley, D.A.; Quinn, V.P.; Jensen, C.D.; Zauber, A.G.; Goodman, M.; Johnson, J.R.; Mehta, S.J.; Becerra, T.A.; Zhao, W.K.; et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: A large community-based study. Gut 2018, 67, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Winawer, S.J.; Zauber, A.G.; Ho, M.N.; O’Brien, M.J.; Gottlieb, L.S.; Sternberg, S.S.; Waye, J.D.; Schapiro, M.; Bond, J.H.; Panish, J.F.; et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1977–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Winawer, S.J.; Fischer, S.E.; Levin, B. Evidence-Based, Reality-Driven Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: The Critical Relationship of Adherence to Effectiveness. JAMA 2016, 315, 2065–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Symonds, E.L.; Hughes, D.; Flight, I.; Woodman, R.; Chen, G.; Ratcliffe, J.; Pedersen, S.K.; Fraser, R.J.L.; Wilson, C.J.; Young, G.P. A Randomized Controlled Trial Testing Provision of Fecal and Blood Test Options on Participation for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Prev. Res. 2019, 12, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Millner, L.M.; Linder, M.W.; Valdes, R., Jr. Circulating tumor cells: A review of present methods and the need to identify heterogeneous phenotypes. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2013, 43, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Haber, D.A.; Velculescu, V.E. Blood-based analyses of cancer: Circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Cancer Discov. 2014, 4, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bettegowda, C.; Sausen, M.; Leary, R.J.; Kinde, I.; Wang, Y.; Agrawal, N.; Bartlett, B.R.; Wang, H.; Luber, B.; Alani, R.M.; et al. Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 224ra224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Church, T.R.; Wandell, M.; Lofton-Day, C.; Mongin, S.J.; Burger, M.; Payne, S.R.; Castanos-Velez, E.; Blumenstein, B.A.; Rosch, T.; Osborn, N.; et al. Prospective evaluation of methylated SEPT9 in plasma for detection of asymptomatic colorectal cancer. Gut 2014, 63, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Symonds, E.L.; Pedersen, S.K.; Baker, R.T.; Murray, D.H.; Gaur, S.; Cole, S.R.; Gopalsamy, G.; Mangira, D.; LaPointe, L.C.; Young, G.P. A Blood Test for Methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a Fecal Immunochemical Test for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2016, 7, e137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kalluri, R.; LeBleu, V.S. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science 2020, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pan, B.T.; Johnstone, R.M. Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: Selective externalization of the receptor. Cell 1983, 33, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lisko, J.; Kamioka, N.; Gleason, P.; Byku, I.; Alvarez, L.; Khan, J.M.; Rogers, T.; Lederman, R.; Greenbaum, A.; Babaliaros, V. Prevention and Treatment of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement. Interv. Cardiol. Clin. 2019, 8, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, J.; Liao, K.; Zhou, W. Exosomes Regulate the Transformation of Cancer Cells in Cancer Stem Cell Homeostasis. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 2018, 4837370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rodriguez, M.; Silva, J.; Herrera, A.; Herrera, M.; Pena, C.; Martin, P.; Gil-Calderon, B.; Larriba, M.J.; Coronado, M.J.; Soldevilla, B.; et al. Exosomes enriched in stemness/metastatic-related mRNAS promote oncogenic potential in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 40575–40587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lin, R.; Wang, S.; Zhao, R.C. Exosomes from human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote migration through Wnt signaling pathway in a breast cancer cell model. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 383, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Y.; Yan, C.; Mu, L.; Huang, K.; Li, X.; Tao, D.; Wu, Y.; Qin, J. Fibroblast-Derived Exosomes Contribute to Chemoresistance through Priming Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Tai, Y.L.; Chen, K.C.; Hsieh, J.T.; Shen, T.L. Exosomes in cancer development and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2364–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Thery, C.; Ostrowski, M.; Segura, E. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 9, 581–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nusse, R.; Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell 2017, 169, 985–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kalra, H.; Gangoda, L.; Fonseka, P.; Chitti, S.V.; Liem, M.; Keerthikumar, S.; Samuel, M.; Boukouris, S.; Al Saffar, H.; Collins, C.; et al. Extracellular vesicles containing oncogenic mutant beta-catenin activate Wnt signalling pathway in the recipient cells. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1690217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hu, J.L.; Wang, W.; Lan, X.L.; Zeng, Z.C.; Liang, Y.S.; Yan, Y.R.; Song, F.Y.; Wang, F.F.; Zhu, X.H.; Liao, W.J.; et al. CAFs secreted exosomes promote metastasis and chemotherapy resistance by enhancing cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Peng, Z.; Liu, C.; Wu, M. New insights into long noncoding RNAs and their roles in glioma. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Quinn, J.J.; Chang, H.Y. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kopp, F.; Mendell, J.T. Functional Classification and Experimental Dissection of Long Noncoding RNAs. Cell 2018, 172, 393–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. De Wever, O.; Pauwels, P.; De Craene, B.; Sabbah, M.; Emami, S.; Redeuilh, G.; Gespach, C.; Bracke, M.; Berx, G. Molecular and pathological signatures of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions at the cancer invasion front. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 130, 481–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Pastushenko, I.; Blanpain, C. EMT Transition States during Tumor Progression and Metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2019, 29, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Greening, D.W.; Gopal, S.K.; Mathias, R.A.; Liu, L.; Sheng, J.; Zhu, H.J.; Simpson, R.J. Emerging roles of exosomes during epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer progression. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 40, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bigagli, E.; Luceri, C.; Guasti, D.; Cinci, L. Exosomes secreted from human colon cancer cells influence the adhesion of neighboring metastatic cells: Role of microRNA-210. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2016, 17, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, H.; Liu, Y.; Sun, P.; Leng, K.; Xu, Y.; Mei, L.; Han, P.; Zhang, B.; Yao, K.; Li, C.; et al. Colorectal cancer-derived exosomal miR-106b-3p promotes metastasis by down-regulating DLC-1 expression. Clin. Sci. 2020, 134, 419–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Si, M.; Yang, J.; Sun, S.; Wu, H.; Cui, S.; Qu, X.; Yu, X. Exosome-encapsulated miRNAs contribute to CXCL12/CXCR4-induced liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by enhancing M2 polarization of macrophages. Cancer Lett. 2020, 474, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hoshino, A.; Costa-Silva, B.; Shen, T.L.; Rodrigues, G.; Hashimoto, A.; Tesic Mark, M.; Molina, H.; Kohsaka, S.; Di Giannatale, A.; Ceder, S.; et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 2015, 527, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chen, Y.Q. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. Introduction. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013, 32, 3–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Liu, Y.; Cao, X. Characteristics and Significance of the Pre-metastatic Niche. Cancer Cell 2016, 30, 668–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Zeng, Z.; Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; Lan, X.; Song, F.; Sun, J.; Zhou, K.; Liu, X.; Ren, X.; Wang, F.; et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-25-3p promotes pre-metastatic niche formation by inducing vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Schillaci, O.; Fontana, S.; Monteleone, F.; Taverna, S.; Di Bella, M.A.; Di Vizio, D.; Alessandro, R. Exosomes from metastatic cancer cells transfer amoeboid phenotype to non-metastatic cells and increase endothelial permeability: Their emerging role in tumor heterogeneity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Sun, B.; Zhou, Y.; Fang, Y.; Li, Z.; Gu, X.; Xiang, J. Colorectal cancer exosomes induce lymphatic network remodeling in lymph nodes. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 1648–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shao, Y.; Chen, T.; Zheng, X.; Yang, S.; Xu, K.; Chen, X.; Xu, F.; Wang, L.; Shen, Y.; Wang, T.; et al. Colorectal cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles establish an inflammatory premetastatic niche in liver metastasis. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 1368–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, Y.; Cao, X. Immunosuppressive cells in tumor immune escape and metastasis. J. Mol. Med. 2016, 94, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Costa-Silva, B.; Aiello, N.M.; Ocean, A.J.; Singh, S.; Zhang, H.; Thakur, B.K.; Becker, A.; Hoshino, A.; Mark, M.T.; Molina, H.; et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wortzel, I.; Dror, S.; Kenific, C.M.; Lyden, D. Exosome-Mediated Metastasis: Communication from a Distance. Dev. Cell 2019, 49, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pancione, M.; Giordano, G.; Remo, A.; Febbraro, A.; Sabatino, L.; Manfrin, E.; Ceccarelli, M.; Colantuoni, V. Immune escape mechanisms in colorectal cancer pathogenesis and liver metastasis. J. Immunol. Res. 2014, 2014, 686879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Valenti, R.; Huber, V.; Iero, M.; Filipazzi, P.; Parmiani, G.; Rivoltini, L. Tumor-released microvesicles as vehicles of immunosuppression. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 2912–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Poggio, M.; Hu, T.; Pai, C.C.; Chu, B.; Belair, C.D.; Chang, A.; Montabana, E.; Lang, U.E.; Fu, Q.; Fong, L.; et al. Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 Induces Systemic Anti-tumor Immunity and Memory. Cell 2019, 177, 414–427.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wang, X.; Shen, H.; He, Q.; Tian, W.; Xia, A.; Lu, X.J. Exosomes derived from exhausted CD8+ T cells impaired the anticancer function of normal CD8+ T cells. J. Med. Genet. 2019, 56, 29–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Cheng, W.C.; Liao, T.T.; Lin, C.C.; Yuan, L.E.; Lan, H.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Teng, H.W.; Chang, H.C.; Lin, C.H.; Yang, C.Y.; et al. RAB27B-activated secretion of stem-like tumor exosomes delivers the biomarker microRNA-146a-5p, which promotes tumorigenesis and associates with an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 2209–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gallo, A.; Tandon, M.; Alevizos, I.; Illei, G.G. The majority of microRNAs detectable in serum and saliva is concentrated in exosomes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Li, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Bao, C.; Li, S.; Guo, W.; Zhao, J.; Chen, D.; Gu, J.; He, X.; Huang, S. Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: A promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 981–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Liu, L.; Meng, T.; Yang, X.H.; Sayim, P.; Lei, C.; Jin, B.; Ge, L.; Wang, H.J. Prognostic and predictive value of long non-coding RNA GAS5 and mircoRNA-221 in colorectal cancer and their effects on colorectal cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Cancer Biomark. 2018, 22, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Santasusagna, S.; Moreno, I.; Navarro, A.; Martinez Rodenas, F.; Hernandez, R.; Castellano, J.J.; Munoz, C.; Monzo, M. Prognostic Impact of miR-200 Family Members in Plasma and Exosomes from Tumor-Draining versus Peripheral Veins of Colon Cancer Patients. Oncology 2018, 95, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, W.; Hu, J.; Zhou, K.; Chen, F.; Wang, Z.; Liao, B.; Dai, Z.; Cao, Y.; Fan, J.; Zhou, J. Serum exosomal miR-125b is a novel prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. OncoTargets Ther. 2017, 10, 3843–3851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mathivanan, S.; Lim, J.W.; Tauro, B.J.; Ji, H.; Moritz, R.L.; Simpson, R.J. Proteomics analysis of A33 immunoaffinity-purified exosomes released from the human colon tumor cell line LIM1215 reveals a tissue-specific protein signature. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010, 9, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Sun, Y.; Zheng, W.; Guo, Z.; Ju, Q.; Zhu, L.; Gao, J.; Zhou, L.; Liu, F.; Xu, Y.; Zhan, Q.; et al. A novel TP53 pathway influences the HGS-mediated exosome formation in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Welton, J.L.; Khanna, S.; Giles, P.J.; Brennan, P.; Brewis, I.A.; Staffurth, J.; Mason, M.D.; Clayton, A. Proteomics analysis of bladder cancer exosomes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2010, 9, 1324–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hosseini-Beheshti, E.; Pham, S.; Adomat, H.; Li, N.; Tomlinson Guns, E.S. Exosomes as biomarker enriched microvesicles: Characterization of exosomal proteins derived from a panel of prostate cell lines with distinct AR phenotypes. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2012, 11, 863–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Jin, H.; Liu, P.; Wu, Y.; Meng, X.; Wu, M.; Han, J.; Tan, X. Exosomal zinc transporter ZIP4 promotes cancer growth and is a novel diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 2946–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Clark, D.J.; Fondrie, W.E.; Yang, A.; Mao, L. Triple SILAC quantitative proteomic analysis reveals differential abundance of cell signaling proteins between normal and lung cancer-derived exosomes. J. Proteom. 2016, 133, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Griffiths, S.G.; Cormier, M.T.; Clayton, A.; Doucette, A.A. Differential Proteome Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles from Breast Cancer Cell Lines by Chaperone Affinity Enrichment. Proteomes 2017, 5, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. He, M.; Qin, H.; Poon, T.C.; Sze, S.C.; Ding, X.; Co, N.N.; Ngai, S.M.; Chan, T.F.; Wong, N. Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomes promote motility of immortalized hepatocyte through transfer of oncogenic proteins and RNAs. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 1008–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Taverna, S.; Fontana, S.; Monteleone, F.; Pucci, M.; Saieva, L.; De Caro, V.; Cardinale, V.G.; Giallombardo, M.; Vicario, E.; Rolfo, C.; et al. Curcumin modulates chronic myelogenous leukemia exosomes composition and affects angiogenic phenotype via exosomal miR-21. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 30420–30439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sinha, A.; Ignatchenko, V.; Ignatchenko, A.; Mejia-Guerrero, S.; Kislinger, T. In-depth proteomic analyses of ovarian cancer cell line exosomes reveals differential enrichment of functional categories compared to the NCI 60 proteome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 445, 694–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. De Andrade, A.; de Oliveira, C.E.; Dourado, M.R.; Macedo, C.; Winck, F.V.; Paes Leme, A.F.; Salo, T.; Coletta, R.D.; de Almeida Freitas, R.; Galvao, H.C. Extracellular vesicles from oral squamous carcinoma cells display pro- and anti-angiogenic properties. Oral Dis. 2018, 24, 725–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Kim, H.; Kim, D.W.; Cho, J.Y. Exploring the key communicator role of exosomes in cancer microenvironment through proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2019, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Sandim, V.; Monteiro, R.Q. Extracellular vesicle fingerprinting: The next generation for cancer diagnosis? Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, M.; Yu, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, K. Emerging Function and Clinical Values of Exosomal MicroRNAs in Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 16, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ingenito, F.; Roscigno, G.; Affinito, A.; Nuzzo, S.; Scognamiglio, I.; Quintavalle, C.; Condorelli, G. The Role of Exo-miRNAs in Cancer: A Focus on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Valencia, K.; Luis-Ravelo, D.; Bovy, N.; Anton, I.; Martinez-Canarias, S.; Zandueta, C.; Ormazabal, C.; Struman, I.; Tabruyn, S.; Rebmann, V.; et al. miRNA cargo within exosome-like vesicle transfer influences metastatic bone colonization. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 689–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ma, J.; Cao, T.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, F.; Shi, Y.; Xia, J.; Wang, Z.P. miR-223 Regulates Cell Proliferation and Invasion via Targeting PDS5B in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 14, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Qu, S.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, T.; Wen, H.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Exosomal microRNA-32-5p induces multidrug resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma via the PI3K/Akt pathway. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Feng, Y.; Zhong, M.; Zeng, S.; Wang, L.; Liu, P.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Y. Exosome-derived miRNAs as predictive biomarkers for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma chemotherapy resistance. Epigenomics 2019, 11, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ding, C.; Wu, Z.; You, H.; Ge, H.; Zheng, S.; Lin, Y.; Wu, X.; Lin, Z.; Kang, D. CircNFIX promotes progression of glioma through regulating miR-378e/RPN2 axis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Mizoguchi, A.; Takayama, A.; Arai, T.; Kawauchi, J.; Sudo, H. MicroRNA-8073: Tumor suppressor and potential therapeutic treatment. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Singh, R.; Pochampally, R.; Watabe, K.; Lu, Z.; Mo, Y.Y. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-10b promotes cell invasion in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Lu, J.; Liu, Q.H.; Wang, F.; Tan, J.J.; Deng, Y.Q.; Peng, X.H.; Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Xu, X.; Li, X.P. Exosomal miR-9 inhibits angiogenesis by targeting MDK and regulating PDK/AKT pathway in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Yu, S.; Wang, Z.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Guo, T.; Sheng, H.; Chen, J.; Zheng, Q.; et al. Extracellular Vesicles Long RNA Sequencing Reveals Abundant mRNA, circRNA, and lncRNA in Human Blood as Potential Biomarkers for Cancer Diagnosis. Clin. Chem. 2019, 65, 798–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Q.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, T.; Miao, M.; Qin, L.; Wang, B.; Ye, G.; Xiao, B.; Guo, J. Plasma long noncoding RNA protected by exosomes as a potential stable biomarker for gastric cancer. Tumour. Biol. 2015, 36, 2007–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Dong, L.; Lin, W.; Qi, P.; Xu, M.D.; Wu, X.; Ni, S.; Huang, D.; Weng, W.W.; Tan, C.; Sheng, W.; et al. Circulating Long RNAs in Serum Extracellular Vesicles: Their Characterization and Potential Application as Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 1158–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Katz, I.R.; Greenberg, W.M.; Barr, G.A.; Garbarino, C.; Buckley, P.; Smith, D. Screening for cognitive toxicity of anticholinergic drugs. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1985, 46, 323–326. [Google Scholar]
  78. Ahadi, A.; Brennan, S.; Kennedy, P.J.; Hutvagner, G.; Tran, N. Long non-coding RNAs harboring miRNA seed regions are enriched in prostate cancer exosomes. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kogure, T.; Yan, I.K.; Lin, W.L.; Patel, T. Extracellular Vesicle-Mediated Transfer of a Novel Long Noncoding RNA TUC339: A Mechanism of Intercellular Signaling in Human Hepatocellular Cancer. Genes Cancer 2013, 4, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.C.; Luo, X.H.; Tao, G.X.; Guan, M.; Yuan, H.; Hu, D.K. Exosomal Long Noncoding RNAs are Differentially Expressed in the Cervicovaginal Lavage Samples of Cervical Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2016, 30, 1116–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Lang, H.L.; Hu, G.W.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tu, W.; Lu, Y.M.; Wu, L.; Xu, G.H. Glioma cells promote angiogenesis through the release of exosomes containing long non-coding RNA POU3F3. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2017, 21, 959–972. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Berrondo, C.; Flax, J.; Kucherov, V.; Siebert, A.; Osinski, T.; Rosenberg, A.; Fucile, C.; Richheimer, S.; Beckham, C.J. Expression of the Long Non-Coding RNA HOTAIR Correlates with Disease Progression in Bladder Cancer and Is Contained in Bladder Cancer Patient Urinary Exosomes. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Qu, L.; Ding, J.; Chen, C.; Wu, Z.J.; Liu, B.; Gao, Y.; Chen, W.; Liu, F.; Sun, W.; Li, X.F.; et al. Exosome-Transmitted lncARSR Promotes Sunitinib Resistance in Renal Cancer by Acting as a Competing Endogenous RNA. Cancer Cell 2016, 29, 653–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ge, X.; Wang, Y.; Nie, J.; Li, Q.; Tang, L.; Deng, X.; Wang, F.; Xu, B.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. The diagnostic/prognostic potential and molecular functions of long non-coding RNAs in the exosomes derived from the bile of human cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 69995–70005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, X.; Li, L. Curcumin suppresses cisplatin resistance development partly via modulating extracellular vesicle-mediated transfer of MEG3 and miR-214 in ovarian cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2017, 79, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, S.; Xu, H.; Wang, D.; Feng, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhong, S. Circular RNA expression in exosomes derived from breast cancer cells and patients. Epigenomics 2019, 11, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, H.; Zhu, L.; Bai, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Deng, T.; Yang, H.; Sun, W.; Wang, X.; Zhu, K.; et al. Exosomal circRNA derived from gastric tumor promotes white adipose browning by targeting the miR-133/PRDM16 pathway. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 2501–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, X.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H.; Bai, M.; Ning, T.; Deng, T.; Liu, R.; Fan, Q.; Zhu, K.; Li, J.; et al. Exosome-delivered circRNA promotes glycolysis to induce chemoresistance through the miR-122-PKM2 axis in colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2020, 14, 539–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, J.; Li, Z.; Jiang, P.; Peng, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, K.; Liu, H.; Bi, H.; Liu, X.; Li, X. Circular RNA IARS (circ-IARS) secreted by pancreatic cancer cells and located within exosomes regulates endothelial monolayer permeability to promote tumor metastasis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Dai, X.; Chen, C.; Yang, Q.; Xue, J.; Chen, X.; Sun, B.; Luo, F.; Liu, X.; Xiao, T.; Xu, H.; et al. Exosomal circRNA_100284 from arsenite-transformed cells, via microRNA-217 regulation of EZH2, is involved in the malignant transformation of human hepatic cells by accelerating the cell cycle and promoting cell proliferation. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, S.; Hu, Y.; Lv, X.; Li, B.; Gu, D.; Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Su, Y. Circ-0000284 arouses malignant phenotype of cholangiocarcinoma cells and regulates the biological functions of peripheral cells through cellular communication. Clin. Sci. 2019, 133, 1935–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, L.; Li, W.; Chen, N.; Zhao, H.; Xu, G.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, L.; Yu, D.; et al. FLI1 Exonic Circular RNAs as a Novel Oncogenic Driver to Promote Tumor Metastasis in Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 1302–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Chen, X.; Chen, R.X.; Wei, W.S.; Li, Y.H.; Feng, Z.H.; Tan, L.; Chen, J.W.; Yuan, G.J.; Chen, S.L.; Guo, S.J.; et al. PRMT5 Circular RNA Promotes Metastasis of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder through Sponging miR-30c to Induce Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 6319–6330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Wong, C.H.; Chen, Y.C. Clinical significance of exosomes as potential biomarkers in cancer. World J. Clin. Cases 2019, 7, 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ogata-Kawata, H.; Izumiya, M.; Kurioka, D.; Honma, Y.; Yamada, Y.; Furuta, K.; Gunji, T.; Ohta, H.; Okamoto, H.; Sonoda, H.; et al. Circulating exosomal microRNAs as biomarkers of colon cancer. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhu, M.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, D.; Zhou, X.; Shan, X.; Qi, L.W.; Wu, L.; Cheng, W.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, L.; et al. A panel of microRNA signature in serum for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 17081–17091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Matsumura, T.; Sugimachi, K.; Iinuma, H.; Takahashi, Y.; Kurashige, J.; Sawada, G.; Ueda, M.; Uchi, R.; Ueo, H.; Takano, Y.; et al. Exosomal microRNA in serum is a novel biomarker of recurrence in human colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2015, 113, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sun, L.; Liu, X.; Pan, B.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Su, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xu, M.; Xu, X.; et al. Serum exosomal miR-122 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. J. Cancer 2020, 11, 630–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, L.; Duan, W.; Yan, S.; Xie, Y.; Wang, C. Circulating long non-coding RNA colon cancer-associated transcript 2 protected by exosome as a potential biomarker for colorectal cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 113, 108758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yu, J.; Dong, W.; Liang, J. Extracellular Vesicle-Transported Long Non-Coding RNA (LncRNA) X Inactive-Specific Transcript (XIST) in Serum is a Potential Novel Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2020, 26, e924448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pan, B.; Qin, J.; Liu, X.; He, B.; Wang, X.; Pan, Y.; Sun, H.; Xu, T.; Xu, M.; Chen, X.; et al. Identification of Serum Exosomal hsa-circ-0004771 as a Novel Diagnostic Biomarker of Colorectal Cancer. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Bernhard, O.K.; Greening, D.W.; Barnes, T.W.; Ji, H.; Simpson, R.J. Detection of cadherin-17 in human colon cancer LIM1215 cell secretome and tumour xenograft-derived interstitial fluid and plasma. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1834, 2372–2379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Tian, Y.; Ma, L.; Gong, M.; Su, G.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Chen, C.; Li, L.; et al. Protein Profiling and Sizing of Extracellular Vesicles from Colorectal Cancer Patients via Flow Cytometry. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 671–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yun, C.W.; Lee, J.H.; Go, G.; Jeon, J.; Yoon, S.; Lee, S.H. Prion Protein of Extracellular Vesicle Regulates the Progression of Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chang, L.C.; Hsu, Y.C.; Chiu, H.M.; Ueda, K.; Wu, M.S.; Kao, C.H.; Shen, T.L. Exploration of the Proteomic Landscape of Small Extracellular Vesicles in Serum as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 732743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 01379 g001 550
Figure 1. Proposed role of small EVs in the metastatic cascade of CRC Premetastatic niches (PMNs) possess six characteristics: vascular leakiness and angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammation, immunosuppression, genetic reprogramming, and organotropism. sEVs play a vital role in each part of the above characteristics. CRC-derived sEVs containing miR-25-3p contribute to the induction of vascular leakiness and angiogenesis. Furthermore, sEVs containing miR-25-3p may impair the junctions of the endothelial cell layer. CRC-derived sEVs containing IRF-2 have been postulated to stimulate VEGF-C (vascular endothelial growth factor C) secretion, resulting in lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. sEVs containing miR-21 help polarize liver macrophages into an IL-6-secreting phenotype, contributing to the inflammatory environment. Tumor-derived sEVs express specific integrins to initiate the formation of PMNs in a particular tissue. Integrin α6/integrin β4/integrin β1 and integrin β5/integrin αv are enriched in sEVs with lung and liver tropism, respectively. (The figure was created at Biorender.com on 9 January 2022).
Figure 1. Proposed role of small EVs in the metastatic cascade of CRC Premetastatic niches (PMNs) possess six characteristics: vascular leakiness and angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, inflammation, immunosuppression, genetic reprogramming, and organotropism. sEVs play a vital role in each part of the above characteristics. CRC-derived sEVs containing miR-25-3p contribute to the induction of vascular leakiness and angiogenesis. Furthermore, sEVs containing miR-25-3p may impair the junctions of the endothelial cell layer. CRC-derived sEVs containing IRF-2 have been postulated to stimulate VEGF-C (vascular endothelial growth factor C) secretion, resulting in lymphangiogenesis and metastasis. sEVs containing miR-21 help polarize liver macrophages into an IL-6-secreting phenotype, contributing to the inflammatory environment. Tumor-derived sEVs express specific integrins to initiate the formation of PMNs in a particular tissue. Integrin α6/integrin β4/integrin β1 and integrin β5/integrin αv are enriched in sEVs with lung and liver tropism, respectively. (The figure was created at Biorender.com on 9 January 2022).
Ijms 23 01379 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, L.-C.; Chiu, H.-M.; Wu, M.-S.; Shen, T.-L. The Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Progression of Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031379

AMA Style

Chang L-C, Chiu H-M, Wu M-S, Shen T-L. The Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Progression of Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(3):1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031379

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Li-Chun, Han-Mo Chiu, Ming-Shiang Wu, and Tang-Long Shen. 2022. "The Role of Small Extracellular Vesicles in the Progression of Colorectal Cancer and Its Clinical Applications" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 3: 1379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031379

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop