Next Article in Journal
Increased Gene Targeting in Hyper-Recombinogenic LymphoBlastoid Cell Lines Leaves Unchanged DSB Processing by Homologous Recombination
Next Article in Special Issue
p53 Regulates Mitochondrial Dynamics in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification
Previous Article in Journal
Expression of NUCB2/NESF-1 in Breast Cancer Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23169178
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 in the Release of Exosomes and Vascular Calcification

by
Angelina Pavlic
1,
Nasim Bahram Sangani
1,
Johanna Kerins
2,
Gerry Nicolaes
1,
Leon Schurgers
1 and
Chris Reutelingsperger
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
2
University College Maastricht, Maastricht University, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 9178; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169178
Submission received: 22 July 2022 / Revised: 9 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 August 2022 / Published: 16 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ectopic Calcification in Hereditary and Acquired Diseases: From Bench to Bedside)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vascular calcification (VC) is the pathological precipitation of calcium salts in the walls of blood vessels. It is a risk factor for cardiovascular events and their associated mortality. VC can be observed in a variety of cardiovascular diseases and is most prominent in diseases that are associated with dysregulated mineral homeostasis such as in chronic kidney disease. Local factors and mechanisms underlying VC are still incompletely understood, but it is appreciated that VC is a multifactorial process in which vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) play an important role. VSMCs participate in VC by releasing extracellular vesicles (EVs), the extent, composition, and propensity to calcify of which depend on VSMC phenotype and microenvironment. Currently, no targeted therapy is available to treat VC. In-depth knowledge of molecular players of EV release and the understanding of their mechanisms constitute a vital foundation for the design of pharmacological treatments to combat VC effectively. This review highlights our current knowledge of VSMCs in VC and focuses on the biogenesis of exosomes and the role of the neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2).

1. Introduction

Vascular calcification (VC) is the mineralization of vascular tissue and is considered a pathological process with high prevalence in the aging population of industrialised countries. VC is a risk factor and predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [1]. VC can develop in almost all arterial tissues and can occur in both the intimal and medial layer, also referred to as calcific atherosclerosis and Mönckeberg’s sclerosis, respectively [2]. Calcification can occur also in aortic valves [3] and small blood vessels of adipose tissue and skin (calciphylaxis) [4]. To date no pharmacological therapeutics targeting VC are available.
VC was thought to be a passive process [5] but is currently described as an active process controlled in part by vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). The molecular mechanisms through which VSMCs regulate intimal and medial calcification are still not fully understood. It is clear, however, that these are closely linked to VSMC phenotypic switching in response to local cues. VSMCs can transdifferentiate across a spectrum of phenotypes from calcification-suppressing cells (contractile phenotype) into calcifying cells (osteo/chondrogenic phenotypes) [6,7]. VSMC apoptosis [8] and senescence [9] have also been demonstrated to contribute to VC.
Recent studies have highlighted the prominent role of VSMC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the regulation of VC [10,11]. Such EVs can either promote or inhibit VC dependent on the phenotype of the EV-producing cell [10]. Interestingly, EVs derived from other vascular cells such as endothelial cells can contribute to VC [12,13]. Also, platelet EVs induce VSMCs to switch towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype [14] and are thought to augment downstream processes such as VC [11]. These studies point towards a central role for EVs in VC.
EVs can be produced by different biogenetic pathways that determine their size and composition and, hence, their bioactivity. The enzyme neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2, also known as sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3, SMPD3), which generates ceramide by cleaving its substrate sphingomyelin [15], has been revealed as an important enzyme in the formation of EVs and the sorting of cargo into EVs. Pharmacological inhibition of nSMase2 reduces the secretion of EVs by VSMCs and VSMC-driven calcification in vitro [16], and diminishes atherogenesis in a mouse model of atherosclerosis in vivo [17].
This review describes our current understanding of the role of VSMCs in VC and focuses on EV-biogenesis and nSMase2.

2. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Vascular Calcification

The healthy arterial wall is composed of several cell types including VSMCs which are predominantly present in the tunica media of the vessel wall. VSMCs are highly specialized cells that maintain vascular structure and regulate vascular tone and blood pressure. VSMCs have prominent roles also in vascular pathologies such as atherosclerosis [18] and aneurysm formation [19]. They participate in early- and late-stage atherosclerosis and display great plasticity in phenotype during atherogenesis. VSMCs can adopt a wide range of phenotypes including contractile, synthetic, macrophage-like, adipocyte-like, osteogenic and stem cell-like phenotypes. These phenotypes can be distinguished by their protein-expression profiles and their abilities to contract, synthesise extracellular matrix proteins, migrate and proliferate. Literature about VSMC phenotypic switching in atherosclerosis has been excellently reviewed recently [18,20].
VSMCs have been assigned the protagonist role in our current models of the VC process. In physiology, VSMCs are predominantly in the contractile phenotype and suppress the precipitation of calcium-phosphate crystals in an environment that is supersaturated with calcium ions (Ca2+) and inorganic phosphate-ions (PO43−, Pi). On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that osteochondrogenic VSMCs, a phenotype frequently observed in vascular pathology, actively promote extracellular matrix calcification [6]. The difference in calcification-modulation between the contractile and osteochondrogenic phenotype is largely explained by differences in the expression of inhibitors and activators of calcification. Contractile VSMCs synthesise Matrix Gla Protein (MGP) which is a strong inhibitor of precipitation of calcium salts in the vascular wall and which can reverse VC [21,22]. Knocking out the MGP gene results in massive calcification of the aorta in vivo [21,23]. MGP is a vitamin K-dependent protein that needs to undergo post-translational gamma-carboxylation of four glutamate residues in order to express its full anti-calcification activity [24]. Interestingly, dietary intake of vitamin K lowers the levels of circulating dephosphorylated and uncarboxylated MGP, an inactive isoform of MGP which is positively correlated with the severity of VC [25] and mortality [26]. The mechanisms of action of MGP are still not fully understood but likely include inhibition of calcium-crystal growth by shielding properties and maintaining VSMCs in the contractile phenotype through blocking bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) functions [21]. Interestingly, the in vitro phenotypic switch of contractile VSMCs by elevated Ca2+ is accompanied by a transient upregulation of MGP followed by a loss of MGP expression [27]. This was associated with osteogenic transdifferentiation of the VSMCs. Another potent inhibitor of calcification is extracellular pyrophosphate (P2O74−, PPi) which is produced by ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase-1 (eNPP1) [28]. PPi can be degraded into pro-calcifying Pi by tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) [29]. Hence, eNPP1 and TNAP activity regulate a balance that determines the growth of calcium crystals. This type of regulation occurs in mineralizing bone and is driven mainly by osteoblasts [30]. A similar regulation of VC by Pi-stimulated VSMCs in aorta explants has been proposed [31]. Similar to calcifying osteoblasts that produce mineralizing matrix vesicles, pro-calcifying VSMCs generate EVs that form nucleation sites for calcification [32,33]. Pro-calcifying EVs can be released by apoptosis (apoptotic bodies, [8]), budding of vesicles from the plasma membrane (matrix-like vesicles, [34]) and fusion of multivesicular bodies (MVBs) with the plasma membrane giving release of exosomes [35]. EVs derived from VSMCs can contain Ca2+ and Pi [36], and proteins and lipids that either inhibit (MGP, Fetuin-A, prothrombin) [27,37] or stimulate calcification (annexins A1, A2 and A6, phosphatidylserine (PS), TNAP, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78)) [27,38,39,40,41]. The balance between inhibitors and stimulators is believed to determine whether EVs promote calcification. Recently it was proposed that contractile VSMCs, which secrete low amounts of exosomes, respond to injury by switching to a proliferative phenotype that secretes enhanced amounts of reparative non-calcifying exosomes. Prolonged exposure to an inflammatory environment and high levels of Ca2+ and Pi push proliferative VSMCs further towards a calcifying phenotype secreting high amounts of calcifying exosomes [16]. There is, hence, a link between VSMC phenotype and the amount and composition of secreted exosomes. Recent research has focused on the biogenetic pathways of exosomes and has unveiled parts of the molecular machinery that sort cargo for loading into exosomes. Knowledge of these machineries and understanding how they operate may offer possibilities to design targeted therapies to intervene with VC. The next section reviews the literature on EVs with emphasis on exosomes.

3. Extracellular Vesicles: Nomenclature, Structure and Biogenesis

EVs are cell-derived particles that are encapsulated by a phospholipid bilayer. Initially, EVs were regarded as a waste-disposal system of the cell to discard superfluous and noxious material. This view has changed dramatically over the past decade. Currently, EVs are seen as important structures, which are generated by well-orchestrated processes and which serve relevant functions such as intercellular communication in physiology and pathology as for example in the developing brain [42,43,44].
Unfortunately, literature still encompasses high inconsistency regarding the nomenclature used to describe EVs. For example, EV is used to indicate exosomes and vice versa and the usage of the terms is based on the authors’ preference [44]. In order to provide guidance, the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles (ISEV) proposed a consensus nomenclature in which EV is used as a generic term to describe all lipid bilayer encapsulated particles released from cells and unable to replicate due to the lack of a functional nucleus [45]. EV subtypes are distinguished on the basis of biogenesis, size, composition and mechanism of release [46]. Exosomes are the smallest vesicles with a size from 30 nm to 100 nm in diameter. Microvesicles range in diameter from 100 nm to 1000 nm and apoptotic bodies have diameters larger than 500 nm. EV subclasses can be isolated by methods that separate on size, density, and antigen expression [46]. Overlapping characteristics between the different subtypes have hampered the assignment of unique parameters to either subtype and, consequently, an exact description of the EV subtype and its biogenetic pathway, features and bioactivity are not possible. Hence, one has to realise that published research on EVs has been performed with mixtures of EVs that are enriched for a specific EV subclass. Apoptotic bodies have a broad size distribution and result from a process that orchestrates the demise of the cell and that produces lipid membrane delimited cellular fragments containing a broad variety of cellular components including organelles, proteins, DNA and RNA [47,48]. Apoptotic bodies are removed from the tissue by phagocytosis [49]. Unphagocytosed apoptotic bodies of VSMCs have been shown to stimulate calcification [8]. The second subclass of EVs, the microvesicles, are generated from plasma membrane segments by outward budding and regulated “pinching off” of a vesicular membrane structure, a process indicated with the term scission. Microvesicle formation requires cytoskeletal actin and microtubules, molecular motors such as dynein, kinesis and myosin, soluble N-ethylmaleimide sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), Ras-associated binding proteins (Rab) guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) and tethering factors [50,51]. Microvesicles produced under pathological conditions such as atherosclerosis can enhance calcification [34]. The third subclass of EVs, the exosomes, are the smallest EVs and they are formed by the complex multistep endocytic membrane transport pathway. This pathway starts with the formation of early endosomes by invagination and inward budding and scission of the plasma membrane. Early endosomes evolve into late endosomes and multivesicular bodies (MVBs) carrying small lipid bilayer encapsulated vesicular structures that are termed intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) [46]. Endosome maturation is mainly mediated by the small GTPases Rab5 and Rab7 in a process called Rab conversion. Rab5, the marker of early endosomes, is replaced by Rab7, the marker of late endosomes [52,53]. Once formed, MVBs can either fuse with lysosomes for lysosomal degradation or with the plasma membrane for secretion of the ILVs as exosomes [54]. Recently it was demonstrated that nSMase2-activity increases exosome secretion by inhibiting disrupting Vacuolar-type ATPase (V-ATPase) assembly on MVB and inhibiting, consequently, acidification of MVBs and MVB sorting towards lysosomes [55]. Once rescued from lysosomal degradation by nSMase2-activity, MVBs can dock to the plasma membrane to release their exosomes. Rab27a and Rab27b have been shown to play a key role in exosome secretion through targeting MVBs to the cell periphery and their docking at the plasma membrane [56].
The cargo that exosomes carry does not arise from a stochastic process but is determined by sorting mechanisms closely linked to the ILV biogenetic pathways. ILVs are generated by inward budding and scission of the limiting membranes of late endosomes through two distinct pathways: (i) the well-studied endosomal sorting complexes required for transport (ESCRT) dependent pathway and (ii) the ESCRT independent pathway. The ESCRT dependent pathway is driven by a protein machinery consisting of four complexes (ESCRT-0,-I,-II,-III) which are sequentially recruited to the limiting membrane of the late endosome and which cause sorting of ubiquitinated proteins, inward budding and scission [54,57,58]. Depletion of key ESCRT subunits could not fully inhibit MVB formation and exosome secretion demonstrating existence of ESCRT-independent pathways [59]. The ESCRT-independent pathway is driven by ceramide, which is generated in the limiting membrane by the action of the enzyme nSMase2 and which promotes inward budding [60] (see also next section). The ESCRT-independent pathway selects cargo by the sorting properties of ALG-2-interacting protein X (ALIX) [61] and the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a key component of the autophagy machinery [62]. Interestingly, VSMCs submitted to calcifying conditions switch phenotype and upregulate the release of calcifying exosomes which depends on the activity of nSMase2 [16,37]. Proteomic analyses of these exosomes reveal a composition that contains both pro- and anti-calcifying proteins, the balance of which determines their propensity to induce and propagate calcification. Kapustin et al. demonstrated that part of the cargo was derived from endocytosis of extracellular components [16,37] (Figure 1). Their experiments also strongly suggest that switching of contractile VSMCs towards the pro-calcifying phenotype is accompanied by upregulation of nSMase2-dependent secretion of pro-calcifying exosomes.

4. Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2: Structure and Function in Exosome Release

Sphingomyelinases (SMases) are intracellular enzymes that catalyse the formation of ceramide by hydrolysis of sphingomyelin. SMases can be classified into acid, neutral and alkaline SMases on the basis of their respective optimal pH for the expression of enzymatic activity. Mammalian neutral SMases (nSMases) can be categorised into 4 types: nSMase1, nSMase2, nSmase3 and mitochondria-associated nSMase (MA-nSMase) [63]. The different nSMases are believed to function in different cellular compartments and to support different cellular functions [64,65,66]. For example, nSMase1 is associated with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and nucleus [67] and believed to be important for ceramide production during ER-stress [63], nSMase2 is predominantly localised to the plasma membrane, and to the membranes of the Golgi and the endosomal recycling compartments [68,69] and crucial for the production of ceramide in support of ILV-formation of MVBs [60]. MA-nSMase is detected at mitochondria-associated membranes [70] and believed to participate in apoptotic pathways [63,71]. The catalytic activity of nSMases is enhanced by divalent cations such as magnesium ions (Mg2+). The negatively charged aminophospholipid PS activates all nSMases but has no effect on nSMase1 activity [72]. Except for a set of conserved residues of the catalytic site, suggesting that nSMases catalyse hydrolysis of sphingomyelin by a common mechanism, the 4 types of nSMases share little structural homology [63].
Human nSMase2 is encoded by the SMPD3 gene and has a single polypeptide chain of 655 amino acids which is organised in functionally distinct domains. The polypeptide chain has an N-terminal region (residues 1–84) containing two hydrophobic segments, a collagenous domain (residues 119–340) and a C-terminal catalytic domain (residues 341–655) [69]. Tagging experiments indicated that the two hydrophobic segments are inserted into the plasma membrane without spanning the entire membrane [73] (Figure 2).
The N-terminal region harbouring the two hydrophobic segments is necessary for PS binding [75]. The N-terminus, the catalytic domain and the C-terminus are located at the cytosolic side of the plasma membrane. This topology poses an interesting problem in the light of our understanding that its substrate sphingomyelin is preferentially located in the outer plasma membrane leaflet. During apoptosis lipid scrambling moves sphingomyelin from the outer to the inner leaflet where it is cleaved by SMases [76]. Whether a similar mechanism operates during nonapoptotic ceramide production by nSMase2 remains unknown to date. Recently the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human nSMase2 was elucidated at 1.85-Å resolution revealing that the region connecting the catalytic domain with the N-terminal domain contains a binding site for the positive allosteric effector PS [74,77]. The widely used non-competitive inhibitor GW4689 of nSMase2 exerts its inhibitory activity through competing with PS for binding to the allosteric site of nSMase2 [74,78].
Ceramide generated by nSMases can activate various intracellular signalling pathways including the apoptotic cascade [79,80]. For example, apolipoprotein C-I (ApoC-I) activates nSMases of human aortic VSMCs resulting in increased production of ceramide, which can mediate cytochrome C-release, procaspase 3 activation and subsequently apoptosis [81]. A causal connection between nSMase-produced ceramide, apoptosis and calcification was shown with OxLDL stimulated human femoral artery VSMCs [82]. In addition, ceramide produced by nSMases can activate a nonapoptotic pathway towards calcification. It causes clustering of cholesterol-rich domains [83] and bending of the phospholipid bilayer with a negative curvature as a consequence of its cone-shaped structure [84]. Trajkovic et al. were the first to demonstrate that this property of ceramide is involved in biogenesis of MVBs by mediating ILV formation in a manner that does not depend on the ESCRT-machinery [60]. The properties of ceramide to coalesce cholesterol-rich microdomains and to bend the phospholipid membrane are believed to drive ILV formation. Using the nSMase inhibitors GW4689 [78] and spiroepoxide [85], and RNA interference the authors were able to show that the ceramide necessary for ILV formation and exosome secretion was produced by nSMase2. This landmark study on ceramide’s role in exosome secretion triggered numerous investigations into the role of sphingolipids and sphingomyelinases in EV biogenesis (for recent review see [86]. Many studies utilised GW4869 and spiroepoxide to show a role for nSMase2. The selectivity and efficacy of these inhibitors, however, have never been demonstrated unambiguously. It has been reported that GW4869 had no effect on the secretion of exosomes by several cancer cell lines whereas nSMase2 knockout had a profound inhibitory effect on these cells [87]. Hence, inhibitors cannot be used alone to prove a role for nSMase2. Methods should also be included that inactivate the SMPD3 gene (CRISPR/Cas9) or interfere with nSMase2 mRNA translation (shRNA, siRNA). Table 1 lists a series of published studies that utilised these methods to demonstrate the involvement of nSMase2 in the secretion of exosomes by cultured cells.
Genetic deficiencies of nSMase2 by full knockout or local knockdown strategies underscored the relevance of nSMase2 to exosome secretion in vivo. Dinkins et al. crossed the 5XFAD mouse, which is a model of Alzheimer’s Disease, with the m-smpd3fro/fro mouse, which is deficient in functional nSMase2 [98]. The fro;5XFAD mice produced significantly less exosomes in the brain as compared to the 5XFAD mice [95]. Dickens and co-workers showed that intrastriatal injection of IL-1β in C57BL/6J mice caused neutrophil influx which was absent in m-smpd3fro/fro mice [99]. The authors did not measure the effect of IL-1β on exosome secretion in situ but were able to demonstrate convincingly that the neutrophil influx was invoked by an nSMase2-dependent secretion of exosomes by astrocytes. Lecuyer et al. performed intracortical injections of CRISPR-Cas9 constructs designed to inactivate the SMPD3 gene in the mouse brain. Inactivation of the SMPD3 gene suppressed the secretion of exosomes by microglia as demonstrated in vitro after isolation of microglia from brain tissue [100]. They also studied the uptake of exosomes by isolated microglia and found that diminishing nSMase2 activity changed recognition of exosomes suggesting involvement of nSMase2 in cargo selection. A comparable conclusion was reached by Guo and coworkers who found that nSMase2 was involved in packaging of prion protein into exosomes [93]. Leidal et al. who investigated secretory autophagy in HEK293T cells, proposed an LC3-dependent EV loading and secretion (LDELS) process [62]. This pathway depends on the activity of nSMase2 as demonstrated by nSMase2 knockdown. Employing proximity-dependent biotinylation proteomics the authors revealed that LC3 recruits factor associated with neutral sphingomyelinase activation protein (FAN) to the limiting membrane where it is required for ILV-formation, likely by activating nSMase2 [15]. LC3 also captures proteins such as the RNA binding proteins scaffold-attachment factor B (SAFB) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K (KHNRNPK), which are then loaded into the ILVs that get secreted as exosomes. This study is the first to provide a link between nSMase2 and a molecular machinery for cargo selection (Figure 1).

5. Future Perspectives

Recent studies have unveiled nSMase2 as one of the key enzymes in exosome secretion by a broad range of cell types. nSMase2-activity participates in biogenesis, cargo selection and the fate of MVBs and, consequently, in the bioactivity of exosomes. It was demonstrated that nSMase2-activity is required for the release of pro-calcifying exosomes by VSMCs. Hence, nSMase2 is a potential target for treating VC pharmacologically. Currently, only few inhibitors have been described to target nSMase2 of which PDCC seems to have the most favourable features from a pharmacological perspective [101]. PDDC, a noncompetitive inhibitor, was the result of chemical optimization of the main hit from a human nSMase2 high throughput screen. Whether PDDC has satisfactory selectivity remains to be determined. The availability of the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of human nSMase2 has opened possibilities to discover superior competitive inhibitors by virtual screening strategies. Inhibitors targeting nSMase2 will face great challenges on their route towards their application in the pharmacological treatment of patients with VC because of the anticipated ubiquity of the nSMase2-exosome axis in the patient. The anticipated major challenge will be the effects of inhibitors on the brain and the bone since nSMase2 plays prominent roles both in brain and bone physiology [102,103]. Targeted delivery of inhibitors to vascular tissue would be a strategy to reduce potential adverse effects of nSMase2-inhibitors on brain and bone. Such strategy is considered feasible since targeting inflamed blood vessel walls with nanostructures containing pharmacons has demonstrated efficacy in treating atherosclerotic lesions of the aorta in mouse models [104,105].

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally for writing—original draft preparation; G.N., L.S. and C.R. contributed for writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

A.P., G.N., L.S. and C.R. received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska—Curie grant agreement No. 675111 for the project EVOluTION. N.B.S. received funding from Stichting Terre—the Dutch Rett Syndrome Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rennenberg, R.J.M.W.; Kessels, A.G.H.; Schurgers, L.J.; van Engelshoven, J.M.A.; de Leeuw, P.W.; Kroon, A.A. Vascular Calcifications as a Marker of Increased Cardiovascular Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2009, 5, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Demer, L.L.; Tintut, Y. Vascular Calcification: Pathobiology of a Multifaceted Disease. Circulation 2008, 117, 2938–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lindman, B.R.; Sukul, D.; Dweck, M.R.; Madhavan, M.V.; Arsenault, B.J.; Coylewright, M.; Merryman, W.D.; Newby, D.E.; Lewis, J.; Harrell, F.E., Jr.; et al. Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 78, 2354–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brandenburg, V.; Al-Fakhri, N.; Nemeth, K.; Goettsch, C.; Schurgers, L.J.; Vermeer, C.; Hofbauer, L.C.; Schoppet, M. Calcification Inhibitors in Vascular Calciphylaxis Associated with Normal Renal Function. Thromb. Haemost. 2012, 108, 1241–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schinke, T.; Karsenty, G. Vascular Calcification--a Passive Process in Need of Inhibitors. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2000, 15, 1272–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Durham, A.L.; Speer, M.Y.; Scatena, M.; Giachelli, C.M.; Shanahan, C.M. Role of Smooth Muscle Cells in Vascular Calcification: Implications in Atherosclerosis and Arterial Stiffness. Cardiovasc. Res. 2018, 114, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jaminon, A.; Reesink, K.; Kroon, A.; Schurgers, L. The Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Arterial Remodeling: Focus on Calcification-Related Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Proudfoot, D.; Skepper, J.N.; Hegyi, L.; Bennett, M.R.; Shanahan, C.M.; Weissberg, P.L. Apoptosis Regulates Human Vascular Calcification In Vitro: Evidence for Initiation of Vascular Calcification by Apoptotic Bodies. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shanahan, C.M. Mechanisms of Vascular Calcification in CKD—Evidence for Premature Ageing? Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2013, 9, 661–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Blaser, M.C.; Aikawa, E. Roles and Regulation of Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiovascular Mineral Metabolism. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 5, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schurgers, L.J.; Akbulut, A.C.; Kaczor, D.M.; Halder, M.; Koenen, R.R.; Kramann, R. Initiation and Propagation of Vascular Calcification Is Regulated by a Concert of Platelet- and Smooth Muscle Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mas-Bargues, C.; Borrás, C.; Alique, M. The Contribution of Extracellular Vesicles from Senescent Endothelial and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells to Vascular Calcification. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 854726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lin, X.; Shan, S.-K.; Xu, F.; Zhong, J.-Y.; Wu, F.; Duan, J.-Y.; Guo, B.; Li, F.-X.-Z.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, M.-H.; et al. The Crosstalk between Endothelial Cells and Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Aggravates High Phosphorus-Induced Arterial Calcification. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Vajen, T.; Benedikter, B.J.; Heinzmann, A.C.A.; Vasina, E.M.; Henskens, Y.; Parsons, M.; Maguire, P.B.; Stassen, F.R.; Heemskerk, J.W.M.; Schurgers, L.J.; et al. Platelet Extracellular Vesicles Induce a pro-Inflammatory Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2017, 6, 1322454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shamseddine, A.A.; Airola, M.V.; Hannun, Y.A. Roles and Regulation of Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 in Cellular and Pathological Processes. Adv. Biol. Regul. 2015, 57, 24–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kapustin, A.N.; Chatrou, M.L.L.; Drozdov, I.; Zheng, Y.; Davidson, S.M.; Soong, D.; Furmanik, M.; Sanchis, P.; Rosales, R.T.M.D.; Hernandez, D.A.; et al. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification Is Mediated by Regulated Exosome Secretion. Circ. Res. 2015, 116, 1312–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lallemand, T.; Rouahi, M.; Swiader, A.; Grazide, M.-H.; Geoffre, N.; Alayrac, P.; Recazens, E.; Coste, A.; Salvayre, R.; Negre-Salvayre, A.; et al. nSMase2 (Type 2-Neutral Sphingomyelinase) Deficiency or Inhibition by GW4869 Reduces Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Apoe-/- Mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 1479–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grootaert, M.O.J.; Bennett, M.R. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in atherosclerosis: Time for a Reassessment. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 2326–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petsophonsakul, P.; Furmanik, M.; Forsythe, R.; Dweck, M.; Schurink, G.W.; Natour, E.; Reutelingsperger, C.; Jacobs, M.; Mees, B.; Schurgers, L. Role of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotypic Switching and Calcification in Aortic Aneurysm Formation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019, 39, 1351–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yap, C.; Mieremet, A.; de Vries, C.J.M.; Micha, D.; de Waard, V. Six Shades of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Illuminated by KLF4 (Krüppel-Like Factor 4). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021, 41, 2693–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schurgers, L.J.; Uitto, J.; Reutelingsperger, C.P. Vitamin K-Dependent Carboxylation of Matrix Gla-Protein: A Crucial Switch to Control Ectopic Mineralization. Trends Mol. Med. 2013, 19, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Roumeliotis, S.; Dounousi, E.; Salmas, M.; Eleftheriadis, T.; Liakopoulos, V. Vascular Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: The Role of Vitamin K- Dependent Matrix Gla Protein. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Luo, G.; Ducy, P.; McKee, M.D.; Pinero, G.J.; Loyer, E.; Behringer, R.R.; Karsenty, G. Spontaneous Calcification of Arteries and Cartilage in Mice Lacking Matrix GLA Protein. Nature 1997, 386, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Murshed, M.; Schinke, T.; McKee, M.D.; Karsenty, G. Extracellular Matrix Mineralization Is Regulated Locally; Different Roles of Two Gla-Containing Proteins. J. Cell Biol. 2004, 165, 625–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Popa, D.-S.; Bigman, G.; Rusu, M.E. The Role of Vitamin K in Humans: Implication in Aging and Age-Associated Diseases. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.-P.; Gu, Y.-M.; Thijs, L.; Knapen, M.H.J.; Salvi, E.; Citterio, L.; Petit, T.; Carpini, S.D.; Zhang, Z.; Jacobs, L.; et al. Inactive Matrix Gla Protein Is Causally Related to Adverse Health Outcomes: A Mendelian Randomization Study in a Flemish Population. Hypertension 2015, 65, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kapustin, A.N.; Davies, J.D.; Reynolds, J.L.; McNair, R.; Jones, G.T.; Sidibe, A.; Schurgers, L.J.; Skepper, J.N.; Proudfoot, D.; Mayr, M.; et al. Calcium Regulates Key Components of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell-Derived Matrix Vesicles to Enhance Mineralization. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, e1–e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Onyedibe, K.I.; Wang, M.; Sintim, H.O. ENPP1, an Old Enzyme with New Functions, and Small Molecule Inhibitors-A STING in the Tale of ENPP1. Molecules 2019, 24, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hamczyk, M.R.; Villa-Bellosta, R. Pyrophosphate Metabolism and Calcification. Aging 2018, 10, 3652–3653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hessle, L.; Johnson, K.A.; Anderson, H.C.; Narisawa, S.; Sali, A.; Goding, J.W.; Terkeltaub, R.; Millan, J.L. Tissue-Nonspecific Alkaline Phosphatase and Plasma Cell Membrane Glycoprotein-1 Are Central Antagonistic Regulators of Bone Mineralization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9445–9449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Villa-Bellosta, R. Synthesis of Extracellular Pyrophosphate Increases in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells During Phosphate-Induced Calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2018, 38, 2137–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kapustin, A.N.; Shanahan, C.M. Calcium Regulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell-Derived Matrix Vesicles. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2012, 22, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hutcheson, J.D.; Goettsch, C.; Bertazzo, S.; Maldonado, N.; Ruiz, J.L.; Goh, W.; Yabusaki, K.; Faits, T.; Bouten, C.; Franck, G.; et al. Genesis and Growth of Extracellular-Vesicle-Derived Microcalcification in Atherosclerotic Plaques. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shanahan, C.M.; Crouthamel, M.H.; Kapustin, A.; Giachelli, C.M. Arterial Calcification in Chronic Kidney Disease: Key Roles for Calcium and Phosphate. Circ. Res. 2011, 109, 697–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kapustin, A.N.; Shanahan, C.M. Emerging Roles for Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Exosomes in Calcification and Coagulation. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 2905–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shroff, R.; Long, D.A.; Shanahan, C. Mechanistic Insights into Vascular Calcification in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kapustin, A.N.; Schoppet, M.; Schurgers, L.J.; Reynolds, J.L.; McNair, R.; Heiss, A.; Jahnen-Dechent, W.; Hackeng, T.M.; Schlieper, G.; Harrison, P.; et al. Prothrombin Loading of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell-Derived Exosomes Regulates Coagulation and Calcification. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, e22–e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, N.X.; O’Neill, K.D.; Chen, X.; Moe, S.M. Annexin-Mediated Matrix Vesicle Calcification in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2008, 23, 1798–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goettsch, C.; Hutcheson, J.D.; Aikawa, M.; Iwata, H.; Pham, T.; Nykjaer, A.; Kjolby, M.; Rogers, M.; Michel, T.; Shibasaki, M.; et al. Sortilin Mediates Vascular Calcification via Its Recruitment into Extracellular Vesicles. J. Clin. Investig. 2016, 126, 1323–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rogers, M.A.; Buffolo, F.; Schlotter, F.; Atkins, S.K.; Lee, L.H.; Halu, A.; Blaser, M.C.; Tsolaki, E.; Higashi, H.; Luther, K.; et al. Annexin A1-Dependent Tethering Promotes Extracellular Vesicle Aggregation Revealed with Single-Extracellular Vesicle Analysis. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Furmanik, M.; van Gorp, R.; Whitehead, M.; Ahmad, S.; Bordoloi, J.; Kapustin, A.; Schurgers, L.J.; Shanahan, C.M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Mediates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification via Increased Release of Grp78 (Glucose-Regulated Protein, 78 kDa)-Loaded Extracellular Vesicles. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2021, 41, 898–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bahram Sangani, N.; Gomes, A.R.; Curfs, L.M.G.; Reutelingsperger, C.P. The Role of Extracellular Vesicles during CNS Development. Prog. Neurobiol. 2021, 205, 102124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gomes, A.R.; Sangani, N.B.; Fernandes, T.G.; Diogo, M.M.; Curfs, L.M.G.; Reutelingsperger, C.P. Extracellular Vesicles in CNS Developmental Disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Witwer, K.W.; Théry, C. Extracellular Vesicles or Exosomes? On Primacy, Precision, and Popularity Influencing a Choice of Nomenclature. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1648167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Théry, C.; Witwer, K.W.; Aikawa, E.; Alcaraz, M.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Andriantsitohaina, R.; Antoniou, A.; Arab, T.; Archer, F.; Atkin-Smith, G.K.; et al. Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): A Position Statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and Update of the MISEV2014 Guidelines. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2018, 7, 1535750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Doyle, L.M.; Wang, M.Z. Overview of Extracellular Vesicles, Their Origin, Composition, Purpose, and Methods for Exosome Isolation and Analysis. Cells 2019, 8, 727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, X.; Lai, Y.; Hua, Z.-C. Apoptosis and Apoptotic Body: Disease Message and Therapeutic Target Potentials. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20180992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Battistelli, M.; Falcieri, E. Apoptotic Bodies: Particular Extracellular Vesicles Involved in Intercellular Communication. Biology 2020, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Arandjelovic, S.; Ravichandran, K.S. Phagocytosis of Apoptotic Cells in Homeostasis. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cai, H.; Reinisch, K.; Ferro-Novick, S. Coats, Tethers, Rabs, and SNAREs Work Together to Mediate the Intracellular Destination of a Transport Vesicle. Dev. Cell 2007, 12, 671–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tricarico, C.; Clancy, J.; D’Souza-Schorey, C. Biology and Biogenesis of Shed Microvesicles. Small GTPases 2017, 8, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rink, J.; Ghigo, E.; Kalaidzidis, Y.; Zerial, M. Rab Conversion as a Mechanism of Progression from Early to Late Endosomes. Cell 2005, 122, 735–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Poteryaev, D.; Datta, S.; Ackema, K.; Zerial, M.; Spang, A. Identification of the Switch in Early-to-Late Endosome Transition. Cell 2010, 141, 497–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Piper, R.C.; Katzmann, D.J. Biogenesis and Function of Multivesicular Bodies. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2007, 23, 519–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choezom, D.; Gross, J.C. Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 Controls Exosome Secretion by Counteracting V-ATPase-Mediated Endosome Acidification. J. Cell Sci. 2022, 135, jcs259324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ostrowski, M.; Carmo, N.B.; Krumeich, S.; Fanget, I.; Raposo, G.; Savina, A.; Moita, C.F.; Schauer, K.; Hume, A.N.; Freitas, R.P.; et al. Rab27a and Rab27b Control Different Steps of the Exosome Secretion Pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Frankel, E.B.; Audhya, A. ESCRT-Dependent Cargo Sorting at Multivesicular Endosomes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018, 74, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Olmos, Y.; Carlton, J.G. The ESCRT Machinery: New Roles at New Holes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2016, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Stuffers, S.; Sem Wegner, C.; Stenmark, H.; Brech, A. Multivesicular Endosome Biogenesis in the Absence of ESCRTs. Traffic 2009, 10, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Trajkovic, K.; Hsu, C.; Chiantia, S.; Rajendran, L.; Wenzel, D.; Wieland, F.; Schwille, P.; Brügger, B.; Simons, M. Ceramide Triggers Budding of Exosome Vesicles into Multivesicular Endosomes. Science 2008, 319, 1244–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Larios, J.; Mercier, V.; Roux, A.; Gruenberg, J. ALIX- and ESCRT-III-Dependent Sorting of Tetraspanins to Exosomes. J. Cell Biol. 2020, 219, e201904113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Leidal, A.M.; Huang, H.H.; Marsh, T.; Solvik, T.; Zhang, D.; Ye, J.; Kai, F.; Goldsmith, J.; Liu, J.Y.; Huang, Y.-H.; et al. The LC3-Conjugation Machinery Specifies the Loading of RNA-Binding Proteins into Extracellular Vesicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 22, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Clarke, C.J.; Wu, B.X.; Hannun, Y.A. The Neutral Sphingomyelinase Family: Identifying Biochemical Connections. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 2011, 51, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xiang, H.; Jin, S.; Tan, F.; Xu, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wu, T. Physiological Functions and Therapeutic Applications of Neutral Sphingomyelinase and Acid Sphingomyelinase. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 139, 111610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Clarke, C.J.; Cloessner, E.A.; Roddy, P.L.; Hannun, Y.A. Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2) Is the Primary Neutral Sphingomyelinase Isoform Activated by Tumour Necrosis Factor-α in MCF-7 Cells. Biochem. J. 2011, 435, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Moylan, J.S.; Smith, J.D.; Wolf Horrell, E.M.; McLean, J.B.; Deevska, G.M.; Bonnell, M.R.; Nikolova-Karakashian, M.N.; Reid, M.B. Neutral Sphingomyelinase-3 Mediates TNF-Stimulated Oxidant Activity in Skeletal Muscle. Redox. Biol. 2014, 2, 910–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tomiuk, S.; Zumbansen, M.; Stoffel, W. Characterization and Subcellular Localization of Murine and Human Magnesium-Dependent Neutral Sphingomyelinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 5710–5717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Milhas, D.; Clarke, C.J.; Idkowiak-Baldys, J.; Canals, D.; Hannun, Y.A. Anterograde and Retrograde Transport of Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 between the Golgi and the Plasma Membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1801, 1361–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hofmann, K.; Tomiuk, S.; Wolff, G.; Stoffel, W. Cloning and Characterization of the Mammalian Brain-Specific, Mg2+-Dependent Neutral Sphingomyelinase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 5895–5900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, B.X.; Rajagopalan, V.; Roddy, P.L.; Clarke, C.J.; Hannun, Y.A. Identification and Characterization of Murine Mitochondria-Associated Neutral Sphingomyelinase (MA-nSMase), the Mammalian Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase 5. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 17993–18002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Birbes, H.; El Bawab, S.; Hannun, Y.A.; Obeid, L.M. Selective Hydrolysis of a Mitochondrial Pool of Sphingomyelin Induces Apoptosis. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 2669–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fensome, A.C.; Josephs, M.; Katan, M.; Rodrigues-Lima, F. Biochemical Identification of a Neutral Sphingomyelinase 1 (NSM1)-like Enzyme as the Major NSM Activity in the DT40 B-Cell Line: Absence of a Role in the Apoptotic Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Biochem. J 2002, 365, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tani, M.; Hannun, Y.A. Analysis of Membrane Topology of Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 1323–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Airola, M.V.; Shanbhogue, P.; Shamseddine, A.A.; Guja, K.E.; Senkal, C.E.; Maini, R.; Bartke, N.; Wu, B.X.; Obeid, L.M.; Garcia-Diaz, M.; et al. Structure of Human nSMase2 Reveals an Interdomain Allosteric Activation Mechanism for Ceramide Generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017, 114, E5549–E5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wu, B.X.; Clarke, C.J.; Matmati, N.; Montefusco, D.; Bartke, N.; Hannun, Y.A. Identification of Novel Anionic Phospholipid Binding Domains in Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 with Selective Binding Preference. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 22362–22371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tepper, A.D.; Ruurs, P.; Wiedmer, T.; Sims, P.J.; Borst, J.; van Blitterswijk, W.J. Sphingomyelin Hydrolysis to Ceramide during the Execution Phase of Apoptosis Results from Phospholipid Scrambling and Alters Cell-Surface Morphology. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 150, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Shanbhogue, P.; Hoffmann, R.M.; Airola, M.V.; Maini, R.; Hamelin, D.J.; Garcia-Diaz, M.; Burke, J.E.; Hannun, Y.A. The Juxtamembrane Linker in Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 Functions as an Intramolecular Allosteric Switch That Activates the Enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 7488–7502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Luberto, C.; Hassler, D.F.; Signorelli, P.; Okamoto, Y.; Sawai, H.; Boros, E.; Hazen-Martin, D.J.; Obeid, L.M.; Hannun, Y.A.; Smith, G.K. Inhibition of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Induced Cell Death in MCF7 by a Novel Inhibitor of Neutral Sphingomyelinase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 41128–41139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Nikolova-Karakashian, M.N.; Rozenova, K.A. Ceramide in Stress Response. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 688, 86–108. [Google Scholar]
  80. Stith, J.L.; Velazquez, F.N.; Obeid, L.M. Advances in Determining Signaling Mechanisms of Ceramide and Role in Disease. J. Lipid Res. 2019, 60, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kolmakova, A.; Kwiterovich, P.; Virgil, D.; Alaupovic, P.; Knight-Gibson, C.; Martin, S.F.; Chatterjee, S. Apolipoprotein C-I Induces Apoptosis in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells via Recruiting Neutral Sphingomyelinase. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2004, 24, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Liao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Song, Y.; Wu, W.; Yu, H.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Ye, M.; Lu, L. Ceramide Mediates Ox-LDL-Induced Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Calcification via p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ferreira, N.S.; Goldschmidt-Arzi, M.; Sabanay, H.; Storch, J.; Levade, T.; Ribeiro, M.G.; Addadi, L.; Futerman, A.H. Accumulation of Ordered Ceramide-Cholesterol Domains in Farber Disease Fibroblasts. JIMD Rep. 2014, 12, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Kaltenegger, M.; Kremser, J.; Frewein, M.P.; Ziherl, P.; Bonthuis, D.J.; Pabst, G. Intrinsic Lipid Curvatures of Mammalian Plasma Membrane Outer Leaflet Lipids and Ceramides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2021, 1863, 183709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Arenz, C.; Giannis, A. Synthesis of the First Selective Irreversible Inhibitor of Neutral Sphingomyelinase This Work Was Supported by Grants from the Fonds Der Chemischen Industrie. C.A. Is Grateful to the Land of Baden-Württemberg for a Scholarship from the Landesgraduiertenförderung. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed Engl. 2000, 39, 1440–1442. [Google Scholar]
  86. Verderio, C.; Gabrielli, M.; Giussani, P. Role of Sphingolipids in the Biogenesis and Biological Activity of Extracellular Vesicles. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1325–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Poggio, M.; Hu, T.; Pai, C.-C.; Chu, B.; Belair, C.D.; Chang, A.; Montabana, E.; Lang, U.E.; Fu, Q.; Fong, L.; et al. Suppression of Exosomal PD-L1 Induces Systemic Anti-Tumor Immunity and Memory. Cell 2019, 177, 414–427.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kosaka, N.; Iguchi, H.; Yoshioka, Y.; Takeshita, F.; Matsuki, Y.; Ochiya, T. Secretory Mechanisms and Intercellular Transfer of microRNAs in Living Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 17442–17452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yuyama, K.; Sun, H.; Mitsutake, S.; Igarashi, Y. Sphingolipid-Modulated Exosome Secretion Promotes Clearance of Amyloid-β by Microglia. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 10977–10989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, J.; Liu, K.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Yang, H.; Liu, J.; Pan, T.; Chen, J.; Wu, M.; et al. Exosomes Mediate the Cell-to-Cell Transmission of IFN-α-Induced Antiviral Activity. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Singh, R.; Pochampally, R.; Watabe, K.; Lu, Z.; Mo, Y.-Y. Exosome-Mediated Transfer of miR-10b Promotes Cell Invasion in Breast Cancer. Mol. Cancer 2014, 13, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Asai, H.; Ikezu, S.; Tsunoda, S.; Medalla, M.; Luebke, J.; Haydar, T.; Wolozin, B.; Butovsky, O.; Kügler, S.; Ikezu, T. Depletion of Microglia and Inhibition of Exosome Synthesis Halt Tau Propagation. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 1584–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Guo, B.B.; Bellingham, S.A.; Hill, A.F. The Neutral Sphingomyelinase Pathway Regulates Packaging of the Prion Protein into Exosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 3455–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lang, J.K.; Young, R.F.; Ashraf, H.; Canty, J.M. Inhibiting Extracellular Vesicle Release from Human Cardiosphere Derived Cells with Lentiviral Knockdown of nSMase2 Differentially Effects Proliferation and Apoptosis in Cardiomyocytes, Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells In Vitro. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0165926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dinkins, M.B.; Enasko, J.; Hernandez, C.; Wang, G.; Kong, J.; Helwa, I.; Liu, Y.; Terry, A.V., Jr.; Bieberich, E. Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 Deficiency Ameliorates Alzheimer’s Disease Pathology and Improves Cognition in the 5XFAD Mouse. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 8653–8667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Menck, K.; Sönmezer, C.; Worst, T.S.; Schulz, M.; Dihazi, G.H.; Streit, F.; Erdmann, G.; Kling, S.; Boutros, M.; Binder, C.; et al. Neutral Sphingomyelinases Control Extracellular Vesicles Budding from the Plasma Membrane. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2017, 6, 1378056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hitomi, K.; Okada, R.; Loo, T.M.; Miyata, K.; Nakamura, A.J.; Takahashi, A. DNA Damage Regulates Senescence-Associated Extracellular Vesicle Release via the Ceramide Pathway to Prevent Excessive Inflammatory Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Aubin, I.; Adams, C.P.; Opsahl, S.; Septier, D.; Bishop, C.E.; Auge, N.; Salvayre, R.; Negre-Salvayre, A.; Goldberg, M.; Guénet, J.-L.; et al. A Deletion in the Gene Encoding Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase 3 (Smpd3) Results in Osteogenesis and Dentinogenesis Imperfecta in the Mouse. Nat. Genet. 2005, 37, 803–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dickens, A.M.; Tovar-Y-Romo, L.B.; Yoo, S.-W.; Trout, A.L.; Bae, M.; Kanmogne, M.; Megra, B.; Williams, D.W.; Witwer, K.W.; Gacias, M.; et al. Astrocyte-Shed Extracellular Vesicles Regulate the Peripheral Leukocyte Response to Inflammatory Brain Lesions. Sci. Signal. 2017, 10, eaai7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lecuyer, M.; Pathipati, P.; Faustino, J.; Vexler, Z.S. Neonatal Stroke Enhances Interaction of Microglia-Derived Extracellular Vesicles with Microglial Cells. Neurobiol. Dis. 2021, 157, 105431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rojas, C.; Sala, M.; Thomas, A.G.; Chaudhuri, A.D.; Yoo, S.-W.; Li, Z.; Dash, R.P.; Rais, R.; Haughey, N.J.; Nencka, R.; et al. A Novel and Potent Brain Penetrant Inhibitor of Extracellular Vesicle Release. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 3857–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Tabatadze, N.; Savonenko, A.; Song, H.; Bandaru, V.V.R.; Chu, M.; Haughey, N.J. Inhibition of Neutral Sphingomyelinase-2 Perturbs Brain Sphingolipid Balance and Spatial Memory in Mice. J. Neurosci. Res. 2010, 88, 2940–2951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Stoffel, W.; Hammels, I.; Jenke, B.; Schmidt-Soltau, I.; Niehoff, A. Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 (SMPD3) Deficiency in Mice Causes Chondrodysplasia with Unimpaired Skeletal Mineralization. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 1831–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Duivenvoorden, R.; Tang, J.; Cormode, D.P.; Mieszawska, A.J.; Izquierdo-Garcia, D.; Ozcan, C.; Otten, M.J.; Zaidi, N.; Lobatto, M.E.; van Rijs, S.M.; et al. A Statin-Loaded Reconstituted High-Density Lipoprotein Nanoparticle Inhibits Atherosclerotic Plaque Inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lameijer, M.; Binderup, T.; van Leent, M.M.T.; Senders, M.L.; Fay, F.; Malkus, J.; Sanchez-Gaytan, B.L.; Teunissen, A.J.P.; Karakatsanis, N.; Robson, P.; et al. Efficacy and Safety Assessment of a TRAF6-Targeted Nanoimmunotherapy in Atherosclerotic Mice and Non-Human Primates. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2018, 2, 279–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 23 09178 g001 550
Figure 1. The nSMase2-dependent pathway of ILV-formation in MVBs. nSMase2 produces ceramide which bends the membrane inward by its cone-shaped structure. nSMase2 is likely activated by FAN, which is recruited to the limiting membrane by LC3, which also selects cargo for the ILVs. VSMCs can secrete exosomes that either stimulate or inhibit VC depending on the balance of their cargo. Cargo is composed of endocytosis of extracellular compounds and sorting of intracellular compounds during ILV formation. Whether LC3 is involved in sorting anti- and pro-calcifying compounds is not known to date. ILV: intraluminal vesicle. MVB: multivesicular body. II: prothrombin. PS: phosphatidylserine. A1, A2, A6: annexins A1, A2 and A6. TNAP: tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase. GRP78, glucose-regulated protein 78,000.
Figure 1. The nSMase2-dependent pathway of ILV-formation in MVBs. nSMase2 produces ceramide which bends the membrane inward by its cone-shaped structure. nSMase2 is likely activated by FAN, which is recruited to the limiting membrane by LC3, which also selects cargo for the ILVs. VSMCs can secrete exosomes that either stimulate or inhibit VC depending on the balance of their cargo. Cargo is composed of endocytosis of extracellular compounds and sorting of intracellular compounds during ILV formation. Whether LC3 is involved in sorting anti- and pro-calcifying compounds is not known to date. ILV: intraluminal vesicle. MVB: multivesicular body. II: prothrombin. PS: phosphatidylserine. A1, A2, A6: annexins A1, A2 and A6. TNAP: tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase. GRP78, glucose-regulated protein 78,000.
Ijms 23 09178 g001
Ijms 23 09178 g002 550
Figure 2. Membrane topology of nSMase2 and tertiary structure of the C-terminal part of the catalytic domain. The domain organisation and topology of the domains are derived from [73]. The tertiary structure is based on coordinates taken from [74]. N: N-terminus. HS1 and HS2: Hydrophobic segments 1 and 2. JX: domain juxtapositioned to the domain with the hydrophobic segments and critical for allosteric activation. C: C-terminus.
Figure 2. Membrane topology of nSMase2 and tertiary structure of the C-terminal part of the catalytic domain. The domain organisation and topology of the domains are derived from [73]. The tertiary structure is based on coordinates taken from [74]. N: N-terminus. HS1 and HS2: Hydrophobic segments 1 and 2. JX: domain juxtapositioned to the domain with the hydrophobic segments and critical for allosteric activation. C: C-terminus.
Ijms 23 09178 g002
Table
Table 1. Studies that examined the role of nSMase2 in exosome composition and release by cells in culture. TEM: Transmission Electron Microscopy, WB: Western Blotting, NTA: Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, siRNA: small interfering RNA, shRNA: short hairpin RNA, miR: micro RNA.
Table 1. Studies that examined the role of nSMase2 in exosome composition and release by cells in culture. TEM: Transmission Electron Microscopy, WB: Western Blotting, NTA: Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis, siRNA: small interfering RNA, shRNA: short hairpin RNA, miR: micro RNA.
Cell TypeExosome Verification MethodMethod to Demonstrate Role of nSMase2Examined Cargo of the ExosomesReference
Oli-neuTEMGW4869, spiroepoxide, siRNAProteoLipid Protein[60]
HEK293WB (CD63)GW4869, siRNA, overexpressionmiR-16, miR-146a[88]
Neuro2ATEM, WB (Alix, Tsg101)GW4869, siRNApro-Aβ fibrillogenesis activity[89]
THP-1TEM, WB (CD63)GW4869, spiroepoxide, shRNAanti-viral activity[90]
MDA-MB-231SEM, WB (CD63)GW4869, overexpressionmiR-106[91]
Primary human VSMCsNTA, WB (CD9, CD63)GW4869, spiroepoxide, siRNApro-calcifying activity[16]
Primary murine microgliaIEM (Tsg101)GW4869, siRNATau46[92]
GT1-7TEM, WB (Tsg101, Flotillin-1)GW4869, RNAiPrion protein[93]
Primary human cardiosphere-derived cellsTEM, NTA, WB (CD63, HSP70)siRNApro-angiogenic and pro-survival activity[94]
Primary mouse astrocytesTNA, WB (Alix, Tsg101)m-nSMase2fro/froAβ oligomers[95]
SKBR3TEM, NTA, WB (Alix, Tsg101, CD81)GW4869, siRNAHsc70[96]
PC3TEM, NTA, WB (CD63)CRISPR/Cas9PD-L1[87]
TIG-3TEM, NTAsiRNA, overexpressionnone studied[97]
HEK293TTEM, WB (Alix, Tsg101, CD9)GW4869, shRNALC3-II, SAFP, HNRNPK[62]
HelaNTA, WB (Alix, CD63, CD81, syntenin)GW4869, siRNAV-ATPase transmembrane subunit[55]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlic, A.; Bahram Sangani, N.; Kerins, J.; Nicolaes, G.; Schurgers, L.; Reutelingsperger, C. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 in the Release of Exosomes and Vascular Calcification. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169178

AMA Style

Pavlic A, Bahram Sangani N, Kerins J, Nicolaes G, Schurgers L, Reutelingsperger C. Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 in the Release of Exosomes and Vascular Calcification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):9178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlic, Angelina, Nasim Bahram Sangani, Johanna Kerins, Gerry Nicolaes, Leon Schurgers, and Chris Reutelingsperger. 2022. "Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Neutral Sphingomyelinase 2 in the Release of Exosomes and Vascular Calcification" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 9178. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23169178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop