Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Expression Profiling Analysis of Kiwifruit GolS and RFS Genes and Identification of AcRFS4 Function in Raffinose Accumulation
Previous Article in Journal
An Effective Approach to Improve the Thermal Conductivity, Strength, and Stress Relaxation of Carbon Nanotubes/Epoxy Composites Based on Vitrimer Chemistry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 16
10.3390/ijms23168834
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of the RAV Gene Family in Wheat and Functional Identification of TaRAV1 in Salt Stress

by
Yun-Xin Luo
1,†,
Shou-Kun Chen
2,†,
Peng-Dan Wang
1,
De Peng
2,
Xu Zhang
2,
Hai-Feng Li
2,* and
Cui-Zhu Feng
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Adaptation and Improvement, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng 475000, China
2
College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(16), 8834; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168834
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 31 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 9 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Plant Responses and Tolerance to Salinity Stress)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
RAV transcription factors (TFs) are unique to higher plants and contain both B3 and APETALA2 (AP2) DNA binding domains. Although sets of RAV genes have been identified from several species, little is known about this family in wheat. In this study, 26 RAV genes were identified in the wheat genome. These wheat RAV TFs were phylogenetically clustered into three classes based on their amino acid sequences. A TaRAV gene located on chromosome 1D was cloned and named TaRAV1. TaRAV1 was expressed in roots, stems, leaves, and inflorescences, and its expression was up-regulated by heat while down-regulated by salt, ABA, and GA. Subcellular localization analysis revealed that the TaRAV1 protein was localized in the nucleus. The TaRAV1 protein showed DNA binding activity in the EMSA assay and transcriptional activation activity in yeast cells. Overexpressing TaRAV1 enhanced the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis and upregulated the expression of SOS genes and other stress response genes. Collectively, our data suggest that TaRAV1 functions as a transcription factor and is involved in the salt stress response by regulating gene expression in the SOS pathway.

1. Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is one of the main staple crops grown worldwide [1,2]. The growth and development of wheat are adversely influenced by abiotic stresses, e.g., salt, drought, and cold [3]. Transcription factors (TFs), such as APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSIVE FACTOR (AP2/EREBP, AP2/ERF), basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP), MYB (contained varying numbers of MYB domain repeats conferring their ability to bind DNA), and WRKY (contained conserved DNA-binding domain which named WRKY domain) TF families, play important roles in the plant stress responses, regulating downstream genes through binding to the DNA elements in the promoters of target genes [4,5].
The RAV (Related to ABI3/VP1) transcription factor family is plant-specific, and most of its members contain two DNA-binding domains, the B3 and AP2 domains [6]. The RAV proteins could be assigned to the B3 or the AP2/EREBP superfamilies [6]. The B3 transcription factors contain the B3 DNA binding domain [7], which was recognized as the third basic domain in the maize transcription factor VIVIPAROUS1 (VP1) [8]. B3 genes have functions in green algae, mosses, liverworts, ferns, and gymnosperms [9]. The B3 superfamily comprises several subfamilies, including LAV (Leafy Cotyledon2 [LEC2]-Abscisic Acid Insensitive3 [ABI3]-VAL), ARF (Auxin Response Factor), RAV, and REM (Reproductive Meristem) families [10]. The AP2/EREBP family transcription factors can regulate plant development, hormonal transduction, and stress responses and are classified into four subfamilies: DREB (Dehydration Responsive Element-Binding), ERF (Ethylene Responsive Element Binding Protein), AP2 (APETALA2) and RAV (Related to ABI3/VP) [11,12,13]. The two different DNA-binding domains bestow RAV proteins more functions.
Six RAV TFs have been identified in Arabidopsis, all containing both the AP2 and the B3 DNA binding domains [6]. In rice, fifteen genes have been identified as RAV, among which only four, OsRAV8, OsRAV9, OsRAV11, and OsRAV12, encode proteins containing both AP2 and B3 domains [14]. Like in rice, thirteen genes have been identified as RAV in soybean, and only five encode proteins containing both domains [15]. In recent years, RAV genes have also been identified in other plant species: 33 in cotton, 11 in pear, and six in loquat. [16,17,18].
AtRAV1 and AtRAV2 were the first two RAV proteins reported [19]. The AP2 and B3 domains of AtRAV1 could bind to CAACA and CACCTG motifs, respectively [19]. AtRAV1 plays important roles during plant development, hormone signaling, and stress responses. Overexpressing AtRAV1 suppresses lateral roots and rosette leaves and promotes leaf sentence [20,21]. AtRAV1 negatively regulates ABA signal transduction by directly repressing the transcription of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5. [22]. AtRAV1, AtRAV1L, and AtRAV2 (TEM2) act as positive regulators during drought and salt stress responses [23,24]. AtRAV2 (TEM2) regulates the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and the GA4 biosynthetic gene AtTEM1 [25,26]. RAV genes in other species have also been identified as involved in stress responses or plant development processes. For example, GmRAV negatively regulates photosynthesis and plant growth, with its overexpression lines showing less growth in leaves, roots, and stems [27]. Overexpression of another RAV gene, GmRAV1, enhances soybean’s salt and drought tolerance [15]. MtRAV3 plays an important role in salt and osmotic stress response and plant growth [28]. The salt and osmotic tolerance could be enhanced by overexpressing BpRAV1 in birch plants [29], and CaRAV1 in Arabidopsis [30,31]. However, overexpression of GhRAV1 reduced the resistance to salt and drought in Arabidopsis [32].
RAV TFs also play important roles during the biotic stress response. Tomato RAV2 (SlRAV2) could activate PR gene’s expression and function in disease resistance [33]. CaRAV1 could enhance the biotic pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis [30]. MeRAV1 and MeRAV2 play important roles in disease resistance against cassava bacterial blight and oxidative stress and drought response in cassava [34,35,36]. During plant development, FaRAV1 activates the expression of anthocyanin pathway genes and positively regulates anthocyanin accumulation in strawberries [37]. ZmRAVL1 could alter the endogenous brassinosteroid content and leaf angle by regulating the expression of Bri1 [38]. The sugarcane RAV transcription factor plays an essential role during aerenchyma formation by regulating endopolygalacturonase expression [39]. Although they have been studied in various species, the number and functions of wheat RAV TFs are still unclear.
According to the above reports, we made the hypothesis that RAV transcription factors play important roles for stress responses in wheat. We thus studied the number, sequence, and structure of wheat RAV genes. Furthermore, we cloned one that is located on chromosome 1D and named it TaRAV1. We found that the expression of TaRAV1 was slightly induced by heat but strongly inhibited by salt, ABA, and GA. The TaRAV1 protein was localized in the nucleus and showed both DNA binding and transcriptional activation activities. Overexpressing TaRAV1 in Arabidopsis increases the transcription of the SOS genes and RD29A, RD29B, and RD22, enhancing salt tolerance.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Phylogenetic Analyses of Wheat RAV Genes

From searching the wheat genome, we identified a total of 26 RAV genes. These genes were unevenly distributed on nine chromosomes (Figure 1) and named TaRAV1A to TaRAV11D according to homology and their locations on chromosomes. Among them, 10 TaRAV segmental duplication genes were identified and formed seven segmental duplication pairs; three tandem duplication pairs were generated from six TaRAV genes (Figure 1a and Table S1). Each TaRAV protein contained a conserved AP2 domain, a nuclear localization signal, and a B3 domain (Figure S1). The protein length ranged from 305 (TaRAV10D) to 429 (TaRAV1A) amino acids, and the molecular weight from 33.099 kDa (TaRAV10D) to 47.63 kDa (TaRAV1A) (Table S2). Protein subcellular localization was predicted with the CELLO web server, showing that 17 TaRAVs were localized in the nucleus, eight in chloroplasts, and one (TaRAV9B) in mitochondria ().
Using program MEGA 7, we analyzed the sequence alignment of 26 wheat, four rice, and six Arabidopsis RAVs, and constructed an un-rooted neighbor-joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree [6,14]. According to the clade support values, these RAVs could be classified into five groups (Figure 1b). Group I was the largest, containing 13 wheat RAVs, while groups AtRAV-I and AtRAV-II contained Arabidopsis RAVs only.
The genomic DNA sequence and CDS (coding sequence) were analyzed to reveal the gene structure. The TaRAV genes are similar: all contained only one exon, except for TaRAV8D, which contained two exons (Figure S2).

2.2. Expression Patterns of TaRAV Genes in Different Tissues

To explore the function of TaRAV genes, we used qRT-PCR to analyze their expression in different tissues. As shown in Figure 2, 10 genes are highly expressed in roots, and six (TaRAV1B, TaRAV1D, TaRAV3D, TaRAV6A/U, TaRAV7A/B/D, and TaRAV11D) showed a high expression level in stems. Some homoeologous wheat genes showed similar expression patterns. For example, TaRAV9A, TaRAV9B, and TaRAV9D are mainly expressed in roots. TaRAV1A, TaRAV1B, and TaRAV1D are weakly expressed in leaf and inflorescence tissues.

2.3. Expression Patterns of TaRAV1

According to the phylogenetic analysis (Figure 1), TaRAV3D was close to OsRAV11 (LOC_Os01g49830) and OsRAV12 (LOC_Os05g47650). Its coding sequence showed 70% and 72% homology with AtRAV1 (At1g13260) and AtRAV1L (At3g25730), respectively. AtRAV1 has been functionally characterized in our previous study [22]. All five proteins contain a conserved AP2 domain and a B3 domain (Figure S3). Therefore, we chose TaRAV3D for further analysis and renamed it TaRAV1.
The qRT-PCR method was used to determine the expression levels of TaRAV1 in different organs. As shown in Figure 2, TaRAV1 was moderately expressed in roots, leaves and inflorescences, and highly expressed in stems (Figure 2). Stress treatment assays showed that TaRAV1 was up-regulated by heat but down-regulated by salt, ABA, and GA treatment. No significant difference was found in the TaRAV1 expression levels after cold and PEG treatments (Figure 3a). We also analyzed the expression level of TaRAV1 at different time points under NaCl treatment. When treated with 200 mM NaCl for 0.5 h, the expression of TaRAV1 decreased significantly. The expression level was lowest after 1-h treatment and recovered partly with longer treatments. These data indicate that TaRAV1 responds to abiotic stress, e.g., heat and salt, and hormone transduction, e.g., ABA and GA.

2.4. TaRAV1 Is Localized in the Nucleus

As a putative transcription factor, the TaRAV1 protein contains a predicted nuclear localization signal (NLS) between the two DNA binding domains (Figure S3). To investigate its subcellular localization, we constructed the pSUPER:TaRAV1-GFP vector and transformed it into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves. Hence, the nucleus located protein marker, AtH2B-mCherry [40] was involved to detect the nucleus localization of TaRAV1. Observation with confocal microscopy found that TaRAV1-GFP fluorescence was well co-localized with AtH2B-mCherry and clearly in the nucleus of epidermal cells, suggesting that TaRAV1-GFP was localized in the nucleus (Figure 4 upper level and Figure S5). The SUPER promoter driving GFP construction (pSUPER:GFP) was introduced as a negative control. When co-expressed with AtH2B-mCherry in tobacco leaves, the GFP was determined at cytoplasm of the epidermal cells, yet the AtH2B-mCherry was determined only in the nucleus (Figure 4, lower level). These data demonstrate that TaRAV1 is localized in the nucleus.

2.5. TaRAV1 Shows Both Transcription Activation and DNA Binding Activities

To test the transcription activation activity, we expressed TaRAV1 in yeast strain AH109, in which HIS3 was used as a reporter. As shown in Figure 5a, the yeast cells carrying the pGBKT7-TaRAV1 plasmid grew well on a histidine-deficient medium, similar to the positive control carrying pGABKT7-RecT, while the vector control (pGBKT7) could not grow. These results indicate that TaRAV1 transcriptionally activated the reporter gene HIS3 in yeast cells.
To determine the DNA binding capability of TaRAV1, we expressed and purified the TaRAV1-GST fusion protein from E. coli and carried out an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). Since the TaRAV1 protein was predicted to contain AP2 and B3 DNA binding domains, which bind to cis-elements CAACA and CACCTG, respectively, a biotin-labeled probe containing both elements was used for the test [19]. The results showed that TaRAV1 could bind the DNA probe containing both DNA elements but failed to bind the probe containing mutant DNA elements (Figure 5b) [8], indicating that TaRAV1 can specifically bind to the two cis-elements.

2.6. Overexpressing TaRAV1 in Arabidopsis Enhances Salt Tolerance

To investigate the function of TaRAV1 in plants, the TaRAV1 CDS driven by the Super promoter was transformed into Arabidopsis. Three transgenic lines (L2, L3, and L6) were chosen for the testing (Figure 6a). We found that when grown on regular MS media, the TaRAV1 transgenic lines showed no difference from wild-type control (WT), while they showed obvious growth advantages on media containing NaCl. The root length of the transgenic seedlings under NaCl treatment was positively correlated with the expression levels of TaRAV1 (Figure 6b). When grown on media containing 120 mM NaCl, the roots of TaRAV1 transgenic lines L2, L3, and L6 were longer than those of WT by 26.3%, 49.4%, and 69.1%, respectively. When grown on 150 mM NaCl, the effect of transgene on root length became more dramatic; the roots of TaRAV1 transgenic lines L2, L3, and L6 were longer than those of WT by 41.4%, 58.4%, and 117.7%, respectively (Figure 6c). In addition, we tested the sensitivity of TaRAV1 transgenic lines to stress hormone ABA but found no differences between the transgenic lines and WT (Figure S4). These results demonstrate that TaRAV1 could enhance salt tolerance in Arabidopsis.

2.7. The Expression of Salt-Responsive Genes Is Altered in TaRAV1 Transgenic Arabidopsis

Using the qRT-PCR method, we examined the expression levels of several salt-responsive genes, including the genes involved in the SOS signaling and the stress response genes RD29A, RD29B, and RD22 [41,42,43,44,45]. The results showed that the expression levels of all these genes were induced by NaCl treatment. Compared with those in WT, the expression levels of SOS1, SOS2, and SOS3 in TaRAV1 transgenic lines were slightly upregulated under normal conditions, but increased significantly after salt stress treatment, especially in L3 and L6 lines. The expression levels of AtRD29A, AtRD29B, and AtRD22 were higher in TaRAV1 transgenic lines than in WT after salt stress treatment but showed no difference under normal conditions (Figure 7). These results suggest that TaRAV1 could enhance the expression of those genes related to salt responses.

3. Discussion

3.1. Wheat Has More RAV Genes Than Diploid Plant Species

In the wheat genome, we identified twenty-six RAV genes, more than those identified in Arabidopsis (6), rice (4), and soybean (6) [6,14,15], and this may reflect that wheat is an allohexaploid with a huge genome [46]. This large number of RAV genes may be one of the essential reasons why wheat is more tolerant to abiotic stresses such as drought and extreme temperatures. A more complex genome can contain more stress response and resistance genes and increase stress tolerance. We propose that RAV is one of the gene families involved in stress response and resistance, which may be the reason it has more family members in wheat. In addition, gene duplication contributed to the expansion of the wheat RAV gene family, further explaining why wheat has more RAV genes than other space.

3.2. TaRAV1 May Work as a Transcription Factor in Wheat

Our research revealed that TaRAV1 protein showed 70% sequence homology with AtRAV1. Like other RAV proteins, TaRAV1 contains one AP2 domain, one B3 domain, and nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in between (Figure S3). TaRAV1-GFP fusion protein is localized in the nucleus of leaf epidermal cells when expressed in tobacco leaves (Figure 4). TaRAV1 has transcriptional activity in yeast cells (Figure 5a). EMSA shows that TaRAV1 binds to the canonical cis-elements CAACA and CACCTG [19] (Figure 5b). These results suggest that TaRAV1 has the characteristics of transcription factors and may act as a transcription factor in wheat.

3.3. TaRAV1 Plays an Important Role in Salt Response

Previous publications have reported that the expression of several RAV genes was related to stress responses [6]. For example, the expression of AtRAV1 is down-regulated by ABA, brassinosteroid, and touch-related stimuli in a dose-dependent and biphasic manner [20,22,47]. The expression of CaRAV1 is upregulated by ABA, NaCl, and cold [30]. The expression of GhRAV1 [32], BnaRAV-1-HY15 [48], MtRAV3 [28], and BpRAV1 [29] is upregulated by ABA, NaCl, or osmotic agents PEG or mannitol. In addition, the expression of GmRAVs in soybean changes in response to drought, NaCl, and ABA [27]. Our results showed that the expression of TaRAV1 slightly increased under heat stress and was down-regulated by ABA, NaCl, and GA treatment, with no obvious change observed under PEG and cold treatments (Figure 3). These observations indicate that RAV transcription factors function in stress responses in different plant species.
The TaRAV1 transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed an improved salt tolerance (Figure 6), consistent with previous observations that overexpressing AtRAV1, AtRAV2, and AtRAV1L enhanced the tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses in Arabidopsis [23] and in cotton [24]. Overexpression of GhRAV1 reduced salt and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [32], while overexpression of CaRAV1, BpRAV1, and MtRAV3 could enhance osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis, birch, and Medicago truncatula, respectively [28,29,30]. According to these data, we propose that RAV transcription factors play important roles in plant response to stresses, especially salt stress, and overexpressing RAV genes could improve plants’ capability to acquire resistance.
Salinity involved genes, such as SOS genes, and abiotic stress involved genes, such as RD29A, RD29B, and RD22, were examined when we studied the function of TaRAV1 (Figure 7). Previous studies indicated that the expression of SOS1, RD29A, RD29B, and RD22 was induced by salt stress [43,44,45]. Our analysis showed that the expression of the three SOS genes was enhanced in TaRAV1 transgenic lines either under normal conditions or under NaCl treatment (Figure 7), indicating that TaRAV1 affects the SOS pathway in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, the transcriptional expression levels of RD29A, RD29B, and RD22 were increased in TaRAV1 transgenic lines under NaCl treatment (Figure 7), suggesting that TaRAV1 participates in the salt-stress response by regulating the expression of stress involved genes. These results demonstrated that TaRAV1 acts as a positive regulator of the salt stress response.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of RAVs

Genomic DNA sequences, coding sequences (CDSs), cDNA sequences, and protein sequences of Triticum aestivum (IWGSC), Oryza sativa, and Arabidopsis thaliana were obtained from the Ensembl Plants database [49]. To identify the wheat RAVs, three steps were used. First, two hidden Markov models (HMMs) of the AP2 (PF00847) and B3 (PF02362), downloaded from the Pfam database [50] and set as the query to search against wheat genome protein sequence using HMMER 3.0 with an e-value < 10−5. Second, the RAVs of rice and Arabidopsis were blasted against the putative RAVs in the first step with an e-value < 10−5 [6,14]. Third, NCBI-CDD [51] and SMART [52] were used to validate the putative RAVs, and sequences without AP2 and B3 domains were removed. After that, the wheat RAVs were obtained.
The ExPASy web server [53] was used to predict the molecular weight of RAVs. The CELLO web [54] server was used to predict the subcellular localization. The chromosome location information of wheat was obtained from the Ensembl Plants database [49]. Gene duplication information was obtained by the MCScanX program with default parameters [55]. Chromosome distribution and gene duplication were visualized using the Circos v0.69 program [56]. An unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed and visualized by MEGA 7 software with 1000 bootstrap replications based on the full-length protein sequence alignment of wheat, rice, and Arabidopsis RAVs [57].

4.2. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The seeds of T. aestivum (Chinese Spring) were surface-sterilized with 75% (v/v) ethanol for 1 min and 1% NaClO for 15 min, followed by washing with sterile water. Then, the sterilized seeds were planted in an artificial climate chamber at 26/22 °C (day/night) with a photoperiod of 14/10 h (day/night). For the analysis of different tissues, the leaves, roots, stems, and inflorescences were collected at the heading stage. For stress response analysis, two-week-old seedlings of T. aestivum (Chinese Spring) were treated with heat (42 °C), cold (4 °C), 20% PEG6000, 200 mM NaCl, 100 μM ABA, or 100 μM GA solution for 2 h. For salt stress at different time points, two-week-old seedlings of T. aestivum (Chinese Spring) were treated with 200 mM NaCl for 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 12 h. After treatment, whole plants were selected for RNA extraction and further qRT-PCR testing. For stress response analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis, seven-day-old wild-type and transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings grown on MS medium were transferred to MS medium with 150 mM NaCl for 3 and 6 h and then selected for RNA extraction.
The TaRAV1 transgenic lines were generated by cloning the coding sequence of TaRAV1 into the pCAMBIA1300 vector and transferred into wild-type Arabidopsis plants (Columbia ecotype) [58]. Wide-type and transgenic Arabidopsis seeds were sterilized with 1% NaClO solution for 10 min, followed by washing with sterile water. The sterilized seeds were germinated on MS medium with or without NaCl under 14 h light/8 h dark at 22 °C for 8 d. Then, the phenotype was compared, and the root length was measured.

4.3. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

For quantitative real-time PCR analysis, cDNA was synthesized with an HiScrip III RT SuperMix Kit for QPCR (R323-01, Vazyme). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Q711-02, Vazyme) on a Q7 Real Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Relative quantitative results were calculated by normalization to Atactin or Taactin. The fluorescence signal was obtained during the PCR annealing step. The primers used are listed in Table S3.

4.4. Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)

EMSA was conducted using a Light Shift Chemiluminescent EMSA Kit (Pierce) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The recombinant TaRAV1-GST fusion protein was purified from E. coli. The DNA sequence containing both AP2 and B3 DNA binding elements was labeled with biotin and used as the EMSA probe (Figure 5b). The same sequence without biotin was used as a competitor, and sequences with mutations in DNA elements were used as a negative control.

4.5. Subcellular Localization Assay

In order to determine the subcellular localization of TaRAV1, the pSUPER:TaRAV1-GFP construct was generated and co-transferred with 35S:AtH2B-mCherry into tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves for subcellular localization assays with confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss LSM 980 with Airysca, Germany). AtH2B is located in nucleus [40]. For GFP signal detection, the argon laser excitation source was 488 nm, and the detection filters ranged from 500 to 585 nm. For mCherry signal detection, the argon laser excitation source was 543 nm, and the detection filters ranged from 570 nm.

4.6. Transcriptional Activity Assay

For the transcriptional activity assay, the TaRAV1 CDS was fused to GAL4 Bind Domain in the pGBKT7 vector. The pGBKT7-TaRAV1 constructs were transformed into yeast cells. The transformed yeast cells were diluted with a 10× dilution series and dotted on SD/-Trp plates. The transcriptional activity of TaRAV1 was judged by the growth of yeast cells on SD/-Trp/-Ade/-His plates. The pGBKT7 vector was transformed into yeast cells as a negative control. pGBKT7-RecT was transformed into yeast cells as a positive control.

5. Conclusions

Here, 26 RAV TFs were identified in wheat, which contained both AP2 and B3 domain. TaRAV1 is located on chromosome 1D, and its expression level was slightly induced by heat but strongly inhibited by salt, ABA, and GA. The TaRAV1 protein showed nucleus location, DNA binding activity in vitro, and transcriptional activity in yeast. The overexpression of TaRAV1 could enhance the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23168834/s1.

Author Contributions

Experiment design, C.-Z.F. and H.-F.L.; experiment performing, C.-Z.F., Y.-X.L., S.-K.C., P.-D.W., D.P. and X.Z.; data analysis, Y.-X.L., S.-K.C. and C.-Z.F.; materials, Y.-X.L. and C.-Z.F.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-X.L., S.-K.C. and C.-Z.F.; writing—review and editing, C.-Z.F., H.-F.L. and S.-K.C.; funding acquisition, C.-Z.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (Grant No. 2019JQ-351 to F.-C.Z.); Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Henan University (Grant No. CJ3050A0240920 to F.-C.Z.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not available.

Data Availability Statement

Not available.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive and professional comments, which helped us to improve the manuscript. We would like to thank Chang-Qing Zhang for the writing improvement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RAV transcription factorsRelated to ABI3/VP1 transcription factor
LAV familiesLeafy Cotyledon2 (LEC2)-Abscisic Acid Insensitive3 (ABI3)-VAL
ARF familiesAuxin Response Factor families
REM familiesReproductive Meristem families
TaRAV1Wheat Related to ABI3/VP1,1
TF transcription factor
ABAAbscisic acid
GAGibberellin
GFPGreen fluorescent protein

References

  1. Khan, M.S.; Rizvi, A.; Saif, S.; Zaidi, A. Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Sustainable Production of Wheat: Current Perspective; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 51–81. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shewry, P.R.; Hey, S.J. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015, 4, 178–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ashraf, M. Stress-induced changes in wheat grain composition and quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 1576–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Singh, K.B.; Foley, R.C.; Onate-Sanchez, L. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Chao, D.; Li, J.; Wang, P.Y.; Qin, F.; et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Matías-Hernández, L.; Aguilar-Jaramillo, A.E.; Marín-González, E.; SuárezLópez, P.; Pelaz, S. RAV genes: Regulation of floral induction and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1459–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Y.; Deng, D.; Zhang, R.; Wang, S.; Bian, Y.; Yin, Z. Systematic analysis of plant-specific B3 domain-containing proteins based on the genome resources of 11 sequenced species. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39, 6267–6282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McCarty, D.R.; Hattori, T.; Carson, C.B.; Vasil, V.; Lazar, M.; Vasil, K. The vivapaurous-1 developmental gene of maize encodes a novel transcriptional activator. Cell 1991, 66, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marella, H.H.; Sakata, Y.; Quatrano, R.S. Characterization and functional analysis of ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3-like genes from Physcomitrella patens. Plant J. 2006, 46, 1032–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Swaminathan, K.; Peterson, K.; Jack, T. The plant B3 superfamily. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13, 647–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Okamuro, J.K.; Caster, B.; Villarroel, R.; Montagu, M.V.; Jofuku, K.D. The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 7076–7081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Saleh, A.; Pagés, M. Plant AP2/ERF transcription factors. Genetika 2003, 35, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Osnato, M.; Matias-Hernandez, L.; Aguilar-Jaramillo, A.E.; Kater, M.M.; Pelaz, S. Genes of the RAV family control heading date and carpel development in rice. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 1663–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, S.P.; Xu, Z.S.; Zheng, W.J.; Wang, Y.X.; Chen, T.F.; Zhou, Y.B.; Min, D.H.; Ma, Y.Z.; Chai, S.C.; Zhang, X.H. Genome-wide analysis of the RAV family in soybean and functional identifification of GmRAV-03 involvement in salt and drought stresses and exogenous ABA treatment. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kabir, N.; Lin, H.; Kong, X.; Liu, L.; Qanmber, G.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yu, Y.; et al. Identification, evolutionary analysis and functional diversification of RAV gene family in cotton (G. hirsutum L.). Planta 2022, 255, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, J.; Deng, Z.; Liang, C.; Sun, H.; Wang, R. Genome-wide analysis of RAV transcription factors and functional characterization of anthocyanin-biosynthesis-related RAV genes in pear. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peng, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, C.; Shahid, M.Q.; Bai, Y.; Hao, J.; Peng, J.; Gao, Y.; et al. EjRAV1/2 delay flowering through transcriptional repression of EjFTs and EjSOC1s in Loquat. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 816086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kagaya, Y.; Ohmiya, K.; Hattori, T. RAV1, a novel DNA-binding protein, binds to bipartite recognition sequence through two distinct DNA-binding domains uniquely found in higher plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hu, Y.X.; Wang, Y.X.; Liu, X.F.; Li, J.Y. Arabidopsis RAV1 is downregulated by brassinosteroid and may act as a negative regulator during plant development. Cell Res. 2004, 14, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Woo, H.R.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Lee, U.; Song, I.J.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Nam, H.G.; Lim, P.O. The RAV1 transcription factor positively regulates leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3947–3957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Feng, C.Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Kong, Y.H.; Wu, W.H.; Chen, Y.F. Arabidopsis RAV1 transcription factor, phosphorylatedby SnRK2 kinases, regulates the expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 during seed germination and early seedling development. Plant J. 2014, 80, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fu, M.; Kang, H.K.; Son, S.H.; Kim, S.K.; Nam, K.H. A subset of Arabidopsis RAV transcription factors modulates drought and salt stress responses independent of ABA. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014, 55, 1892–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mittal, A.; Gampala, S.; Ritchie, G.L.; Payton, P.; Burke, J.J.; Rock, C.D. Related to ABA-Insensitive3 (ABI3)/Viviparous1 and AtABI5 transcription factor coexpression in cotton enhances drought stress adaptation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 578–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Castillejo, C.; Pelaz, S. The balance between CONSTANS and TEMPRANILLO activities determines FT expression to trigger flowering. Curr. Bio. 2008, 18, 1338–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Osnato, M.; Castillejo, C.; Matías-Hernández, L.; Pelaz, S. TEMPRANILLO genes link photoperiod and gibberellin pathways to control flowering in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhao, L.; Luo, Q.; Yang, C.; Han, Y.; Li, W. A RAV-like transcription factor controls photosynthesis and senescence in soybean. Planta 2008, 227, 1389–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, S.; Guo, T.; Shen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Kang, J.; Zhang, J.; Yi, F.; Yang, Q.; Long, R. Overexpression of MtRAV3 enhances osmotic and salt tolerance and inhibits growth of Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 163, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hu, P.; Zhang, K.; Yang, C. Functional roles of the birch BpRAV1 transcription factor in salt and osmotic stress response. Plant Sci. 2022, 315, 111131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sohn, K.H.; Lee, S.C.; Jung, H.W.; Hong, J.K.; Hwang, B.K. Expression and functional roles of the pepper pathogen-induced transcription factor RAV1 in bacterial disease resistance, and drought and salt stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 897–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, S.C.; Choi, D.S.; Hwang, I.S.; Hwang, B.K. The pepper oxidoreductase CaOXR1 interacts with the transcription factor CaRAV1 and is required for salt and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73, 409–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, X.J.; Li, M.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, S.; Hu, R.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.B. Overexpression of cotton RAV1 gene in Arabidopsis confers transgenic plants high salinity and drought sensitivity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Li, C.W.; Su, R.C.; Cheng, C.P.; You, S.J.; Hsieh, T.H.; Chao, T.C.; Chan, M.T. Tomato RAV transcription factor is a pivotal modulator involved in the AP2/EREBP-mediated defense pathway. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wei, Y.; Chang, Y.; Zeng, H.; Liu, G.; He, C.; Shi, H. RAV transcription factors are essential for disease resistance against cassava bacterial blight via activation of melatonin biosynthesis genes. J. Pineal Res. 2018, 64, e12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, P.; Yan, Y.; Bai, Y.; Dong, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zeng, H.; Shi, H. Phosphorylation of RAV1/2 by KIN10 is essential for transcriptional activation of CAT6/7, which underlies oxidative stress response in cassava. Cell Rep. 2021, 37, 110119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, P.; Yan, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liu, G.; Liu, J.; Shi, H. The co-modulation of RAV transcription factors in ROS burst and extensive transcriptional reprogramming underlies disease resistance in cassava. Plant Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 1261–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Shi, Y.; Ma, Y.; Yang, X.; Yin, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; et al. The strawberry transcription factor FaRAV1 positively regulates anthocyanin accumulation by activation of FaMYB10 and anthocyanin pathway genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2267–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tian, J.; Wang, C.; Xia, J.; Wu, L.; Xu, G.; Wu, W.; Li, D.; Qin, W.; Han, X.; Chen, Q.; et al. Teosinte ligule allele narrows plant architecture and enhances high-density maize yields. Science 2019, 365, 658–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tavares, E.Q.P.; Souza1, A.P.D.; Romim, G.H.; Grandis, A.; Plasencia, A.; Buckeridge, M.S. The control of endopolygalacturonase expression by the sugarcane RAV transcription factor during aerenchyma formation. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rosa, S.; Ntoukakis, V.; Ohmido, N.; Pendle, A.; Abranches, R.; Shaw, P. Cell difffferentiation and development in Arabidopsis are associated with changes in histone dynamics at the single-cell level. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 4821–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Halfter, U.; Ishitani, M.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis SOS2 protein kinase physically interacts with and is activated by the calcium-binding protein SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3735–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, J.; Ishitani, M.; Halfter, U.; Kim, C.S.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 3730–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shi, H.; Ishitani, M.; Kim, C.; Zhu, J.K. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 6896–6901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. The plant hormone abscisic acid mediates the drought-induced expression but not the seed-specific expression of RD22, a gene responsive to dehydration stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 238, 17–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Characterization of the expression of a desiccation-responsive RD29 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and analysis of its promoter in transgenic plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 236, 331–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shewry, P.R. Wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 1537–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kagaya, Y.; Hattori, T. Arabidopsis transcription factors, RAV1 and RAV2, are regulated by touch-related stimuli in a dose-dependent and biphasic manner. Genes Genet. Syst. 2009, 84, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Zhuang, J.; Sun, C.C.; Zhou, X.R.; Xiong, A.S.; Zhang, J. Isolation and characterization of an AP2/ERF-RAV transcription factor Bnarav-1-HY15 in Brassica napus L. HuYou15. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 3921–3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bolser, D.M.; Staines, D.M.; Perry, E.; Kersey, P.J. Ensembl plants: Integrating tools for visualizing, mining, and analyzing plant genomic data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1533, 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mistry, J.; Chuguransky, S.; Williams, L.; Qureshi, M.; Salazar, G.A.; Sonnhammer, E.L.L.; Tosatto, S.C.E.; Paladin, L.; Raj, S.; Richardson, L.J.; et al. Pfam: The protein families database in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D412–D419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D222–D226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Letunic, I.; Khedkar, S.; Bork, P. SMART: Recent updates, new developments and status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D458–D460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gasteiger, E.; Gattiker, A.; Hoogland, C.; Ivanyi, I.; Appel, R.D.; Bairoch, A. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 3784–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Yu, C.S.; Chen, Y.C.; Lu, C.H.; Hwang, J.K. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins 2006, 64, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Y.; Tang, H.; Debarry, J.D.; Tan, X.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Lee, T.; Jin, H.; Marler, B.; Guo, H. MCScanX: A toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, e49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Krzywinski, M.; Schein, J.; Birol, I.; Connors, J.; Gascoyne, R.; Horsman, D.; Jones, S.J.; Marra, M.A. Circos: An information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 1639–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Li, X.; Gong, Z.; Koiwa, H.; Niu, X.; Hasegawa, P.M. Bar-expressing peppermint (Mentha × Piperita L. var. Black Mitcham) plants are highly resistant to the glufosinate herbicide liberty. Mol. Breed. 2001, 8, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 23 08834 g001 550
Figure 1. Chromosome location and Phylogenetic analysis of RAV genes in wheat. (a) Chromosome location, and segmentally duplicated gene pairs of wheat (Triticum aestivum) RAV genes; (b) Phylogenetic tree of 26 wheat RAV TFs, 6 Arabidopsis RAV TFs, and 4 rice RAV TFs.
Figure 1. Chromosome location and Phylogenetic analysis of RAV genes in wheat. (a) Chromosome location, and segmentally duplicated gene pairs of wheat (Triticum aestivum) RAV genes; (b) Phylogenetic tree of 26 wheat RAV TFs, 6 Arabidopsis RAV TFs, and 4 rice RAV TFs.
Ijms 23 08834 g001
Ijms 23 08834 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression levels of TaRAV genes in different wheat tissues.RNA was extracted from the root (R), stem (S), leaf (L), and inflorescence (F) tissues, and analyzed using the qRT-PCR method. Transcript levels of TaRAV genes were normalized to that of Taactin, and the levels of root samples were set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE, n = 3. Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Figure 2. Expression levels of TaRAV genes in different wheat tissues.RNA was extracted from the root (R), stem (S), leaf (L), and inflorescence (F) tissues, and analyzed using the qRT-PCR method. Transcript levels of TaRAV genes were normalized to that of Taactin, and the levels of root samples were set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE, n = 3. Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Ijms 23 08834 g002
Ijms 23 08834 g003 550
Figure 3. qRT-PCR analysis of TaRAV1 expression in wheat seedlings treated with stresses or hormones. (a), Expression levels of TaRAV1 in response to different treatments. Seeds were germinated under normal conditions, and before RNA extraction, 2-week-old seedlings were treated for 2 h with heat (42 °C), cold (4 °C), PEG (20% PEG6000), NaCl (200 mM), ABA (100 μM), or GA (100 μM). (b), Expression levels of TaRAV1 in response to different lengths of NaCl treatment. Seedlings were prepared the same way as in (a), and treated with 200 mM NaCl for different lengths of time. Transcript levels were quantified using the qRT-PCR method, and normalized to that of Taactin. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Figure 3. qRT-PCR analysis of TaRAV1 expression in wheat seedlings treated with stresses or hormones. (a), Expression levels of TaRAV1 in response to different treatments. Seeds were germinated under normal conditions, and before RNA extraction, 2-week-old seedlings were treated for 2 h with heat (42 °C), cold (4 °C), PEG (20% PEG6000), NaCl (200 mM), ABA (100 μM), or GA (100 μM). (b), Expression levels of TaRAV1 in response to different lengths of NaCl treatment. Seedlings were prepared the same way as in (a), and treated with 200 mM NaCl for different lengths of time. Transcript levels were quantified using the qRT-PCR method, and normalized to that of Taactin. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Ijms 23 08834 g003
Ijms 23 08834 g004 550
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of TaRAV1 protein. AtH2B-mCherry is a marker for nucleus localization. Constructs pSUPER:TaRAV1-GFP and 35S:AtH2B-mCherry were co-transformed into tobacco leaves using the Agrobacterium infiltration method. pSUPER:GFP and 35S:AtH2B-mCherry were co-transformed into tobacco leaves as a negative control. GFP and mCherry signals were detected by confocal microscopy 3 days after infiltration. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of TaRAV1 protein. AtH2B-mCherry is a marker for nucleus localization. Constructs pSUPER:TaRAV1-GFP and 35S:AtH2B-mCherry were co-transformed into tobacco leaves using the Agrobacterium infiltration method. pSUPER:GFP and 35S:AtH2B-mCherry were co-transformed into tobacco leaves as a negative control. GFP and mCherry signals were detected by confocal microscopy 3 days after infiltration. Scale bars, 50 μm.
Ijms 23 08834 g004
Ijms 23 08834 g005 550
Figure 5. Transcription activation and DNA binding activities of TaRAV1. (a), Growth of yeast cells expressing TaRAV1 on selection media. Plasmid pGBKT7-TaRAV1 was transferred into Yeast AH109, and transformants were spotted on SD/−Trp medium (SD minimal medium lacking Trp, upper panel) and SD/−Trp/−Ade/−His medium (SD minimal medium lacking Trp, Ade and His, lower panel). Yeast cells harboring pGADT7-RecT were used as a positive control; yeast cells harboring pGBKT7 empty vector were used as a negative control. (b), EMSA DNA binding assay. GST-tagged TaRAV1 protein was expressed and purified from E. coli. The probes containing the canonical cis-elements (CAACA and CACCTG) or mutated elements were labeled with biotin for incubation with TaRAV1-GST protein. Unlabeled probes were added for the competition assay. GST protein was used as a negative control.
Figure 5. Transcription activation and DNA binding activities of TaRAV1. (a), Growth of yeast cells expressing TaRAV1 on selection media. Plasmid pGBKT7-TaRAV1 was transferred into Yeast AH109, and transformants were spotted on SD/−Trp medium (SD minimal medium lacking Trp, upper panel) and SD/−Trp/−Ade/−His medium (SD minimal medium lacking Trp, Ade and His, lower panel). Yeast cells harboring pGADT7-RecT were used as a positive control; yeast cells harboring pGBKT7 empty vector were used as a negative control. (b), EMSA DNA binding assay. GST-tagged TaRAV1 protein was expressed and purified from E. coli. The probes containing the canonical cis-elements (CAACA and CACCTG) or mutated elements were labeled with biotin for incubation with TaRAV1-GST protein. Unlabeled probes were added for the competition assay. GST protein was used as a negative control.
Ijms 23 08834 g005
Ijms 23 08834 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of overexpressing TaRAV1 on Arabidopsis salt tolerance. (a), TaRAV1 expression level in wild-type (WT) and 3 selected transgenic lines (L2, L3, L6). Seedlings grown on MS media for 14 days were collected for RNA extraction. Transcript levels of TaRAV1 were quantified using the qRT-PCR method and normalized to that of Atactin. The level of WT is set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). (b), Root elongation of WT and transgenic seedlings on MS agar media. WT and TaRAV1 transgenic seeds were germinated on MS media, and 6-day-old seedlings were transferred to MS media or MS media containing 120 or 150 mM NaCl (MS + 120 or 150 mM NaCl). Plates were cultured vertically for 8 days before measuring root length. Scale bars, 10 mm. (c), Measurement of root length of the seedlings shown in b. Data shown are means ± SE (n ≥ 40). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Figure 6. Effect of overexpressing TaRAV1 on Arabidopsis salt tolerance. (a), TaRAV1 expression level in wild-type (WT) and 3 selected transgenic lines (L2, L3, L6). Seedlings grown on MS media for 14 days were collected for RNA extraction. Transcript levels of TaRAV1 were quantified using the qRT-PCR method and normalized to that of Atactin. The level of WT is set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). (b), Root elongation of WT and transgenic seedlings on MS agar media. WT and TaRAV1 transgenic seeds were germinated on MS media, and 6-day-old seedlings were transferred to MS media or MS media containing 120 or 150 mM NaCl (MS + 120 or 150 mM NaCl). Plates were cultured vertically for 8 days before measuring root length. Scale bars, 10 mm. (c), Measurement of root length of the seedlings shown in b. Data shown are means ± SE (n ≥ 40). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Ijms 23 08834 g006
Ijms 23 08834 g007 550
Figure 7. Expression of salt-responsive genes in TaRAV1 transgenic Arabidopsis. The 7-day-old seedlings of WT and 3 transgenic lines (L2, L3, L6) were treated with 150 mM NaCl for 3 and 6 h. Transcript levels of selected genes were quantified using the qRT-PCR method, and normalized to Atactin mRNA. The transcript levels of WT under control condition (CK) were set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Figure 7. Expression of salt-responsive genes in TaRAV1 transgenic Arabidopsis. The 7-day-old seedlings of WT and 3 transgenic lines (L2, L3, L6) were treated with 150 mM NaCl for 3 and 6 h. Transcript levels of selected genes were quantified using the qRT-PCR method, and normalized to Atactin mRNA. The transcript levels of WT under control condition (CK) were set to 1. Data shown are means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).
Ijms 23 08834 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.-X.; Chen, S.-K.; Wang, P.-D.; Peng, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, H.-F.; Feng, C.-Z. Genome-Wide Analysis of the RAV Gene Family in Wheat and Functional Identification of TaRAV1 in Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168834

AMA Style

Luo Y-X, Chen S-K, Wang P-D, Peng D, Zhang X, Li H-F, Feng C-Z. Genome-Wide Analysis of the RAV Gene Family in Wheat and Functional Identification of TaRAV1 in Salt Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(16):8834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168834

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yun-Xin, Shou-Kun Chen, Peng-Dan Wang, De Peng, Xu Zhang, Hai-Feng Li, and Cui-Zhu Feng. 2022. "Genome-Wide Analysis of the RAV Gene Family in Wheat and Functional Identification of TaRAV1 in Salt Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 16: 8834. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23168834

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop