Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Spirulina Supplementation on Redox Status and Performance Following a Muscle Damaging Protocol
Next Article in Special Issue
The Concentration of Organic Acids in Cranberry Juice Modulates the Gut Microbiota in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Determinants of Seminal Plasma on Sperm Biology and Fertility
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems 2.0
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems

by
Victor Nikonenko
* and
Natalia Pismenskaya
Membrane Institute, Kuban State University, Krasnodar 350040, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(7), 3556; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073556
Submission received: 26 March 2021 / Accepted: 28 March 2021 / Published: 30 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems)
Membranes plays enormous role in our life. A biological cell membrane is an enclosing film that acts as a selective barrier within or around the cell and controls the fluxes of substances in and out of cells. Artificial membranes are widely used for the treatment of water and food solutions like milk, juice and wine); fractionation of organic acids, bioactive compounds and nutrients; and energy production among other applications. Artificial membranes largely mimic the structure and functions of biological membranes. Like cell membranes, many kinds of artificial membranes involve macromolecules consisting of a relatively long hydrophobic polymer chain and a hydrophilic “head” at its end. Such elements allow multiple types of interactions (hydrophobic–hydrophobic, dipole–dipole, ion–dipole, ion–ion) between them and water, which provides a self-assembly resulting in the formation of permselective thin films. Similarity in structure leads to similarity in properties and the approaches to studying the laws governing the behavior of both biological and artificial membranes. It is of interest that Kedem and Katchalsky deduced their famous equations for the description of transport processes in biological membranes [1,2]. Now these equations are largely used for all types of membranes, in particular for modelling ion and water transport in a promising technological process named Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO), which is employed for energy harvesting from salinity variations [3].
The idea of this special issue is to recollect the papers describing physico-chemical and chemico-physical aspects of ion and molecule transport, which are common for both biological and artificial membrane systems. The scope of the issue involves experimental studies and mathematical modeling to provide new knowledge on the mechanisms of ion and molecule transport in artificial and living systems; similarities in behavior of biological and artificial membranes; biomimetic structural features of artificial membranes and their impact on membrane properties and performance for separation processes; generalities and case studies in the field of material structure–properties relationships; thermodynamics and irreversible thermodynamics description; equilibriums and kinetics of transport processes in membrane systems; the coupling of ion and molecule transport with chemical reactions and catalysis; impact of forced and natural convection on ion and molecule transport; mechanisms of electric current-induced convection and its impact on ion and molecule transport across membranes; concentration polarization and coupled effects occurring in membrane systems under the action of external pressure and electric driving forces; physico-chemical and chemico-physical aspects of all kinds of separation, purification, and fractionation in membrane systems. In all cases, the analysis of phenomena at molecular level is encouraged.
Within this issue, there are papers devoted to the study of thin mechanisms of ionic and molecular transport in cell membranes [4,5,6], as well as artificial ones, that mimic biological membranes [7,8]. Y. Trofimov et al. reported the results of molecular dynamic simulations of water confined in the pore of a cell membrane, taking into account that the microscopic properties of water near the molecular surface are radically different from those in the bulk solution [4]. K. Yue et al. [6] applied molecular dynamics to simulate the interactions of inhaled pollutant nanoparticles with a pulmonary surfactant monolayer. The review by M. Tingey et al. [5] evaluated the current tools and methodologies available to study the role of transmembrane proteins in some kinds of cell membranes. The team of Y. Zhang et al. [7] described the mechanism of selective separation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) using polymer inclusion membranes (PIMs) containing ionic liquids as the carrier. This process mimics the selective transport of compounds like phenols and amino acids by facilitating diffusion through cell membranes. W. Tien et al. [8] described the effects of cholesterol on the water permittivity of biomimetic ion-pair amphiphile bilayers, which are used to fabricate vesicles for various pharmaceutical applications.
The problems of preparation and the properties of artificial membranes are considered in [9,10,11,12,13]. S. Aziz et al. [9] developed polymer-blend electrolyte membranes based on chitosan, a biopolymer. It is shown that new membranes have a high performance in electrical double-layer capacitor applications, such as water desalination. The use of the Truhan model permitted a detailed analysis of ion transport parameters of the chitosan-based polymer membrane [10]. B. Jaleh et al. [11] used deposition of TiO2 nanoparticles to improve wettability of an O2 plasma-activated polypropylene membrane. A new hydroxide exchange membrane was synthesized by A. Abbasi et al. [12]. Low zincate crossover and high discharge capacity of this kind of membrane makes it promising for use in zinc–air batteries, an alternative to lithium–ion batteries for various applications. Novel anion-exchange membranes combining the advantages of a dense functionalization architecture and crosslinking structure were fabricated by Q. Ge et al. [13]. A high ratio of hydroxide conductivity to water swelling suggests that these membranes have high potential for application in fuel cells.
The analysis of some membrane properties that affect overall performances was made in references [14,15]. F. Luo et al. [14] examined the transmembrane potential across ion exchange membranes to evaluate their possible power efficiency when applied in a “reverse electrodialysis heat engine”. The impact of different ion composition of a salt solution containing NaHCO3, Na2CO3, and NH4Cl electrolytes was examined. The performance of another membrane process, important for the recovery of fertilizers from wastewater, was studied by O. Rybalkina et al. [15]. Phosphorus transport through anion-exchange membranes in the course of electrodialysis of an NaH2PO4 solution was investigated. It was shown that when H2PO4 ions enter the membrane, a part of these anions dissociates, resulting in the parasitic transport of H+ ions in the depleted solution, which essentially reduces current efficiency of the process.
The analysis of interesting and diverse applications of artificial membranes is reported in references [16,17,18,19]. An ionic liquid-driven supported liquid membrane system was applied by J. Li et al. [16] for preparing a special kind of phosphors, which were characterized by good luminescent properties. The team of L. Bazinet for the first time realized simultaneous separation of peptides from salmon protein hydrolysate by three ultrafiltration membranes stacked in an electrodialysis system [17]. A thorough study of this green and ultraselective process is presented. An application concerning the processing of whey was investigated in references. [18,19]. Dufton et al. [18] used a special mode of electrodialysis where Pulsed Electric Fields (PEFs) were applied. It was found that the PEF mode, in which current pulses alternate with zero-current pauses, can increase the degree of both demineralization and deacidification of the whey, as well as reduce membrane scaling. Another kind of electric current pulse, Pulsed Electrodialysis Reversal (PER), was applied by A. Merkel and A. Ashrafi [19] for the demineralization of acid whey. They alternated relatively long pulses of direct current with short pulses of reverse polarity to decrease the fouling onto the membrane surface during electrodialysis (ED). It was found that the fouling on the diluate side of both the cation and anion exchange membranes in a PER regime was reduced compared to the conventional ED.
The issues connected with the hydrodynamic conditions of mass transfer in membrane systems are considered in references. [20,21,22]. G. Battaglia et al. [20] studied the effect of transmembrane pressure (TMP), which may arise in membrane stacks for electrodialysis (water desalination) or reverse electrodialysis (energy production by salinity gradient), or on solution flow and mass transfer. A clear and intelligible review of the effect of profiling ion-exchange membranes on the properties of electrodialysis was presented by S. Pawlowski, J. Crespo and S. Velizarov [21]. They were very convincing when showing that there is exciting potential for improving membrane performance because of the enormous degree of freedom for creating new profile geometries on a membrane surface. Some problems of the electrokinetic instability of a solution adjacent to an ion-exchange membrane are considered by P. Magnico [22]. The electrokinetic behavior of cation-exchange resin particles arranged in a well-defined geometrical structure was studied by the team led by Z. Slouka [23]. The understanding of the effect of coupling between water and ion transport is of the utmost importance for improving the performance of electro-driven membrane separation processes.

References

  1. Kedem, O.; Katchalsky, A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 1958, 27, 229–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Katchalsky, A.; Kedem, O. Thermodynamics of Flow Processes in Biological Systems. Biophys. J. 1962, 2, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rubinstein, I.; Schur, A.; Zaltzman, B. Artifact of “Breakthrough” osmosis: Comment on the local Spiegler-Kedem-Katchalsky equations with constant coefficients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Trofimov, Y.A.; Krylov, N.A.; Efremov, R.G. Confined Dynamics of Water in Transmembrane Pore of TRPV1 Ion Channel. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tingey, M.; Mudumbi, K.C.; Schirmer, E.C.; Yang, W. Casting a Wider Net: Differentiating between Inner Nuclear Envelope and Outer Nuclear Envelope Transmembrane Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yue, K.; Sun, X.; Tang, J.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, X. A Simulation Study on the Interaction Between Pollutant Nanoparticles and the Pulmonary Surfactant Monolayer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, B.-Y.; Zhang, N.; Li, Z.-Y.; Lang, Q.-L.; Yan, B.-H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Selective Separation of Acetic and Hexanoic Acids across Polymer Inclusion Membrane with Ionic Liquids as Carrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Tien, W.-J.; Chen, K.-Y.; Huang, F.-Y.; Chiu, C.-C. Effects of Cholesterol on Water Permittivity of Biomimetic Ion Pair Amphiphile Bilayers: Interplay between Membrane Bending and Molecular Packing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Aziz, S.B.; Hamsan, M.H.; Kadir, M.F.Z.; Karim, W.O.; Abdullah, R.M. Development of Polymer Blend Electrolyte Membranes Based on Chitosan: Dextran with High Ion Transport Properties for EDLC Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Aziz, S.B.; Karim, W.O.; Brza, M.A.; Abdulwahid, R.T.; Saeed, S.R.; Al-Zangana, S.; Kadir, M.F.Z. Ion Transport Study in CS: POZ Based Polymer Membrane Electrolytes Using Trukhan Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Jaleh, B.; Etivand, E.S.; Mohazzab, B.F.; Nasrollahzadeh, M.; Varma, R.S. Improving Wettability: Deposition of TiO2 Nanoparticles on the O2 Plasma Activated Polypropylene Membrane. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Abbasi, A.; Hosseini, S.; Somwangthanaroj, A.; Mohamad, A.A.; Kheawhom, S. Poly(2,6-Dimethyl-1,4-Phenylene Oxide)-Based Hydroxide Exchange Separator Membranes for Zinc-Air Battery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ge, Q.; Zhu, X.; Yang, Z. Highly Conductive and Water-Swelling Resistant Anion Exchange Membrane for Alkaline Fuel Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Luo, F.; Wang, Y.; Sha, M.; Wei, Y. Correlations of Ion Composition and Power Efficiency in a Reverse Electrodialysis Heat Engine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rybalkina, O.; Tsygurina, K.; Melnikova, E.; Mareev, S.; Moroz, I.; Nikonenko, V.; Pismenskaya, N. Partial Fluxes of Phosphoric Acid Anions through Anion-Exchange Membranes in the Course of NaH2PO4 Solution Electrodialysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, J.; Dong, H.; Yang, F.; Sun, L.; Zhao, Z.; Bai, R.; Zhang, H. Simple Preparation of LaPO4:Ce, Tb Phosphors by an Ionic-Liquid-Driven Supported Liquid Membrane System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Henaux, L.; Thibodeau, J.; Pilon, G.; Gill, T.; Marette, A.; Bazinet, L. How Charge and Triple Size-Selective Membrane Separation of Peptides from Salmon Protein Hydrolysate Orientate their Biological Response on Glucose Uptake. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Dufton, G.; Mikhaylin, S.; Gaaloul, S.; Bazinet, L. Positive Impact of Pulsed Electric Field on Lactic Acid Removal, Demineralization and Membrane Scaling during Acid Whey Electrodialysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Merkel, A.; Ashrafi, A.M. An Investigation on the Application of Pulsed Electrodialysis Reversal in Whey Desalination. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Battaglia, G.; Gurreri, L.; Farulla, G.A.; Cipollina, A.; Pirrotta, A.; Micale, G.; Ciofalo, M. Membrane Deformation and Its Effects on Flow and Mass Transfer in the Electromembrane Processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pawlowski, S.; Crespo, J.G.; Velizarov, S. Profiled Ion Exchange Membranes: A Comprehensible Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Magnico, P. Electro-Kinetic Instability in a Laminar Boundary Layer Next to an Ion Exchange Membrane. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Vobecká, L.; Belloň, T.; Slouka, Z. Behavior of Embedded Cation-Exchange Particles in a DC Electric Field. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nikonenko, V.; Pismenskaya, N. Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073556

AMA Style

Nikonenko V, Pismenskaya N. Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(7):3556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nikonenko, Victor, and Natalia Pismenskaya. 2021. "Ion and Molecule Transport in Membrane Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 7: 3556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop