Next Article in Journal
The Postnatal Offspring of Finasteride-Treated Male Rats Shows Hyperglycaemia, Elevated Hepatic Glycogen Storage and Altered GLUT2, IR, and AR Expression in the Liver
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Spectral Characteristics Investigation of the 2D-2D vdWs Heterostructure Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sex Chromosomes Are Severely Disrupted in Gastric Cancer Cell Lines
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sex Differences in the Incidence of Obesity-Related Gastrointestinal Cancer

Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul 04310, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1253; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031253
Received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 20 January 2021 / Accepted: 23 January 2021 / Published: 27 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender-Biased Molecular Targets in Cancer Biology)

Abstract

:
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide, with 9.6 million people estimated to have died of cancer in 2018. Excess body fat deposition is a risk factor for many types of cancer. Men and women exhibit differences in body fat distribution and energy homeostasis regulation. This systematic review aimed to understand why sex disparities in obesity are associated with sex differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal cancers. Cancers of the esophagus, liver, and colon are representative gastrointestinal cancers, and obesity is a convincing risk factor for their development. Numerous epidemiological studies have found sex differences in the incidence of esophageal, liver, and colorectal cancers. We suggest that these sexual disparities are partly explained by the availability of estrogens and other genetic factors regulating inflammation, cell growth, and apoptosis. Sex differences in gut microbiota composition may contribute to differences in the incidence and phenotype of colorectal cancer. To establish successful practices in personalized nutrition and medicine, one should be aware of the sex differences in the pathophysiology and associated mechanisms of cancer development.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths in 2018 [1,2]. Lung, colorectal, prostate, stomach, and liver cancers are the most common cancer types in men, while breast, colorectal, lung, cervix uteri, and thyroid cancers are the most common cancer types in women. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported that 30–50% of all cancer cases are preventable [1]. Obesity, tobacco use, exposure to viruses such as hepatitis B virus and human papilloma virus, UV radiation, and environmental pollutants have been the major targets of cancer prevention.
Evidence has shown that adiposity in adults is a convincing risk factor for many types of cancer, including cancers of the esophagus, pancreas, liver, colorectum, breast (postmenopausal), endometrium, and kidney [3]. Fat tissue, in association with immune cells, drives chronic and systemic inflammation, which causes genetic mutation that promotes abnormal cell proliferation, a key component of carcinogenesis [4]. Adipose tissue maintains a sufficient number of Treg cells to support anti-inflammatory activities in a healthy condition, whereas adipose tissue in the context of obesity exhibits an excess of proinflammatory Th1 cells and adipokines in association with excess proinflammatory cytokines. Obesity also leads to systemic metabolic dysregulation, which results in hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and constant oxidative stress, resulting in a cellular microenvironment favoring tumor growth [5].
The WHO has reported that the obesity rate has tripled since 1975 [6] and there are more than 1.9 billion overweight adults, among which 650 million adults have obesity. It is also important to note that the overall percentage of women with obesity (15%) is higher than that of men (11%), despite men and women showing similar overweight rates. The prevalence of severe obesity is also higher in women than in men [7]. This difference might be due to a rapid increase in the obesity rate in postmenopausal women and a longer life expectancy in women than in men. Interestingly, men and women exhibit distinctive body fat distributions, with such differences being mainly explained by the actions of gonadal hormones. However, with developments in genetic technology, it has been suggested that sex chromosomes and gene–gene interactions play important roles in energy metabolism [8]. The location of fat depots has received much attention in terms of explaining sex differences in the incidence of many diseases, including cancer. Thus, it is necessary to understand the actions and interactions of sex hormones and sex chromosomes in sex-specific body fat distribution, in association with obesity-related non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular heart diseases, diabetes, and cancer. In this review, we summarize sexual disparities in fat deposition and distribution associated with sex differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal cancers, including esophageal cancer, liver cancer, and colorectal cancer.

2. Sex Differences in Adipose Tissue Distribution and Energy Metabolism

Obesity is defined as abnormal fat accumulation that creates a condition of systemic inflammation, which leads to a higher risk of non-communicable diseases. The fundamental cause of excessive fat accumulation is an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure. Macronutrients, including carbohydrates, proteins, and fat, supply energy and are required for basal metabolism and physical activity. Excessive calories supplied by macronutrients are converted to fatty acids and then stored as triacylglycerides (TG) in fat tissues distributed in different locations.
Physiologically, women exhibit a higher tendency of deposition of fat in the form of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), whereas in men, more fat tends to be deposited in the form of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), mostly distributed around abdominal organs [9]; VAT is known to be metabolically more active than SAT. Central and abdominal adipose tissue (subcutaneous upper body and visceral fat) are correlated with metabolic complications, while gluteal/femoral adipose tissue (lower body fat) has a lower metabolic risk [10]. VAT induces the elevation of circulating concentrations of insulin, free fatty acids (FFAs), and TG, while SAT shows lower lipolysis activity, thus posing a lower risk of metabolic complications. It has also been noted that VAT recruits proinflammatory substances that increase the risk of metabolic complications [11]. Adipose tissue is mostly composed of adipocytes, and adipose tissue mass is determined based on the number and size of adipocytes. Women tend to show an increase in fat mass based on an increase in the number and size of adipocytes, while men mostly show an increase in the size of adipocytes, predisposing them to systemic inflammation [12,13]. In addition, women have a higher amount of brown adipose tissue, which is involved in thermogenesis [14]. Sex differences in fat distribution and characteristics are determined by sex hormones, sex chromosomes, and other biological factors that have not yet been clearly identified (Figure 1).

2.1. Hormonal Factors

Androgens, estrogens, and progesterone are the major sex hormones produced in reproductive organs and various tissues. Estrogens play an important role in maintaining energy homeostasis. Rapid weight gain—especially an increase in abdominal fat mass—in postmenopausal women acts as evidence of the role of estrogens in energy homeostasis [15]. Estrogens, especially 17β-estradiol, regulate the expression of key genes involved in lipogenesis and lipolysis through sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ [8].
Sex hormones participate in biological activities through nuclear receptors present in various tissues [16]. In the brain, estrogen receptor (ER)-α-bound 17β-estradiol controls food intake while maintaining energy homeostasis [17]. Studies have found that female animals show higher ER-α expression in many regions of the brain than their male counterparts [18,19] and that genetic deletion of ER-α affects female animals more than male animals [17]. Androgens have been shown to have a positive association with excess body weight in women [20], while an opposite effect was observed in men [21].
Estrogen also plays a pivotal role in sex-specific body fat distribution. Estrogen depletion leads to an increase in fat accumulation in the abdominal area, and estrogen repletion reverses this effect in female animals [22,23]. Estrogen-treated male animals have been reported to show decreased levels of visceral fat with an increase in subcutaneous fat levels compared to control animals [22]. It has been shown that SAT has higher levels of ERs and progesterone receptors than androgen receptors (AR) in female animals [24]. One multicenter clinical study showed that cross-sex hormonal therapy in trans women and trans men resulted in a more female-like body fat distribution in trans women and vice versa in trans men, emphasizing the role of hormones in body fat distribution [25]. Estrogen replacement therapy also decreases VAT mass in postmenopausal women [26].
Fat mass depends on the size of adipocytes, which is determined by TG accumulation through fatty acid metabolism; therefore, investigations on sex differences in fatty acid metabolism have been conducted. However, previous studies have shown that body adipose tissue lipolysis depends on the location of adipose tissue (upper body adipose tissue is more likely to show lipolysis than leg adipose tissue) and not on sex [27,28]. Insulin and exercise showed similar results in terms of leg adipose tissue lipolysis in both male and female individuals [29]. The storage pattern of dietary fatty acids was not different between men and women when they consumed an isocaloric diet; however, while consuming high-calorie and high-fat diets, women tended to store more fat in the form of lower body SAT than in the form of upper body SAT [30,31]. Few studies have been conducted to prove the effects of estrogens on fatty acid lipolysis or dietary fatty acid storage. However, one study found that postmenopausal women showed greater storage of dietary fatty acids than premenopausal women, although the mechanisms of action remained unclear [32].

2.2. Genetic Factors

The heritability of fat distribution measures has shown distinct differences between men and women [33]. Population studies on the heritability of anthropometric traits have indicated that the heritability of fat distribution measures is higher in women than in men [34]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified more than 100 loci associated with body fat distribution, represented by waist circumference (WC), hip circumference, and waist–hip ratio (WHR) [35,36,37]. Body mass index (BMI) was shown to be associated with 97 loci [36]. Among these loci, some showed sex differences, indicating that there are male- or female-specific biological pathways associated with obesity-related anthropometric measures. A meta-analysis of 32 GWAS found 14 loci significantly associated with WHR, and sex-specific analyses indicated that 14 loci were significant in women, while only three loci were significant in men. Another large-scale meta-analysis reported 49 loci associated with WHR [38], and 20 of the 49 loci revealed significant sex differences. In a rodent model, the analysis of adipose tissue gene expression in male and female animals fed with a high-fat diet revealed more than a few hundred differentially expressed genes [39,40].
All sex differences are primarily determined by sex chromosomes because sex chromosomes are the only chromosomes that differ between the male and female zygotes. The most important primary determinant of sex differences in the following downstream pathways is the sry gene, which causes the differentiation of testis in male zygotes, including the activation of genes that inhibit ovarian differentiation [41]. Therefore, sry is a key Y gene that determines testicular and ovarian development and regulates the secretion of testosterone in men and estrogen in women.
However, it has been noted that sex differences in body composition appear before gonadal hormone exposure. Male babies have a greater lean body mass and longer body length [42]. Lean body mass is greater in boys than in girls regardless of pubertal stage, and sexual dimorphism in fat patterning is apparent even in the pre-pubertal stage [43]. The possible functions of sex chromosomes, other than the functions related to the expression of gonadal hormones influencing fat deposition and distribution, had not been extensively investigated until the sry gene was used to generate a mouse model to test the pure effect of sex chromosomes [12]. In this model, the sry gene located in the Y chromosome was deleted in male mice to produce XY mice with ovaries. Additionally, the sry gene was translocated to a non-sex chromosome to generate XX mice with testis. These two models together with control XY mice with testis and XX mice with ovaries were used to differentiate the functions of sex hormone-producing gonads from the functions of sex chromosomes. In this initial experiment, the authors found that neuronal differences exist independent of gonadal hormones. In a later experiment using this four-core model system, mice were gonadectomized to remove the acute effects of gonadal hormones. The results indicated that obesity-associated phenotypes were positively associated with two X chromosome mice [44]. Thus, previous studies have aimed to identify the genes in the X chromosome that are responsible for body weight gain. The levels of X chromosome-associated genes, including Eif2s3x, Kdm6a, Ddx3x, Kdm5c, Usp9x, and Uba1, were higher in the fat tissue of XX mice than in the fat tissue of XY mice [44]. Other genes in the X chromosome shown to suppress food intake included the O-GlcNAc transferase (Ogt) gene [45] and the 5-HT2C receptor encoding Ht2cr gene [46].
Sex differences in energy homeostasis may be derived from factors other than sex chromosomes, and genes controlling food intake are representative examples. Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) is the pituitary precursor of many biologically active peptides, including melanocyte-stimulating hormone, corticotrophin (ACTH), and β-endorphin [47]. In the central nervous system, POMC-containing cell bodies often reside in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus and the nucleus tractus solitarius of the brainstem, which regulate appetite and food intake [48]. Studies have found that POMC mRNA expression and neural activity are higher in female mice, thus leading to lower food intake in female mice [49]. TAp63, a transcription factor, and Sirt1 in POMC neurons have been suggested as key regulators of energy homeostasis [50,51]. Mice lacking angiotensin II receptors are more prone to diet-induced obesity; however, this effect is only seen in female mice [52]. Deletion of the gene expressing lecithin cholesteric acyl transferase protects female mice from diet-induced obesity [53].

3. Sex Differences in the Incidence of Major Gastrointestinal Cancers in Association with Obesity

3.1. Sex Differences in Esophageal Cancer Incidence

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most common cancer, and one of the major causes of cancer death worldwide [1,54]. It has two main subtypes depending on its histological characteristics: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma accounts for more than 85% of all cases of EC and is related to tobacco use, alcohol and hot beverage consumption, and low intake of fruits and vegetables [1,3,55]. Although the incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has declined, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing in Western countries, including the U.S.A. Overweight or obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus (BE), and tobacco use are risk factors for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma [3,54]. Considering that obesity also increases the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease and BE, the obesity epidemic is closely associated with the increased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma globally [2,56,57,58]. A meta-analysis from 25 epidemiological studies revealed that obesity increased the risk of EC, particularly esophageal adenocarcinoma [59]. There is a strong positive relationship between higher BMI and the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma [60,61]. A pooled analysis reported a 2.4–4.8-fold increased risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in individuals with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, compared with that in individuals with a BMI < 25 kg/m2 [60].
Several studies have found that abdominal obesity, independent of BMI, is consistently associated with an increased risk of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma [62,63]. Abdominal obesity is more common in men, which partly explains the higher incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in men than in women [1,9,64]. Abdominal obesity mainly involves the accumulation of VAT, which induces metabolic alterations, including alterations in the levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and adipokines such as leptin [10]. Human esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines such as OE33, but not esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines, showed increased proliferation in response to IGF-1 exposure [65]. In this study, the serum IGF-1 concentration was increased in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and EC patients with visceral obesity, suggesting that visceral and abdominal obesity might influence the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma in association with IGF-1 levels [65]. In addition, diet-induced obesity was shown to increase the growth rate of esophageal tumors in OE33 tumor-bearing NOD-SCID mice, which was associated with increased levels of abdominal fat and serum leptin [66]. Leptin is involved in the regulation of food intake and energy homeostasis, and its level is elevated in the presence of obesity [67]. Leptin stimulates the growth of cancer cells, including esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines, through the activation of janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) pathways [68]. Interestingly, a case-control study reported that the serum leptin concentration is positively associated with the risk of BE in men but not in women [69]. Women show a higher ratio of subcutaneous leptin expression to visceral omental leptin expression than men, because leptin expression is predominant in SAT [70]. Given that there is an inverse relationship between serum leptin levels and BE incidence in women, despite higher levels of serum leptin than those in men, it is assumed that other factors, such as sex hormones, may contribute to sex differences in the incidence of esophageal diseases, including esophageal adenocarcinoma, which have a strong male predominance [1,64].

3.1.1. Hormonal Factors

Accumulating evidence has shown an association between sex steroid hormones and esophageal adenocarcinoma. A nested case-control study revealed that high levels of serum estradiol, free estradiol, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) were correlated with a low risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in men [71]. Similarly, a high ratio of androgens to estrogens was positively associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in men [72]. In women, hormone replacement therapy reduced the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma [73,74]. Thus, estrogen might play a role in the etiology of esophageal adenocarcinoma [75]. Estrogen increases not only leptin expression but also leptin sensitivity [23,76]. In addition, estrogen has anti-inflammatory functions, thus improving esophageal tissue damage, presumably by suppressing cytokine production via mast cell inactivation. [77,78]. A previous study showed that estrogen downregulates inflammation by inhibiting the expression of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), which is involved in innate and acquired immunity and cell growth [79,80]. Another animal study also found that estrogen treatment significantly decreased MIF expression in esophageal tissue [78]. In addition to its anti-inflammatory activity, estrogen ameliorates esophageal mucosal injury by improving esophageal barrier function through an increase in the expression of tight junction proteins [78,81]. Taken together, it is assumed that estrogen has protective effects against the incidence and progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Indeed, it has been noted that dietary intake of phytoestrogens, including lignans, quercetin, and resveratrol, is beneficial for the prevention of EC [82]. Epidemiological studies performed in women or in both sexes are limited by the low incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in women. Further studies are needed to investigate EC incidence by sex and the related underlying mechanisms.

3.1.2. Genetic Factors

Several studies have reported sex-specific genetic associations for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. A meta-analysis of four GWAS showed that the genetic association between BMI and esophageal adenocarcinoma was significant in women. Moreover, the genetic correlation between WHR and esophageal adenocarcinoma was significant in men, suggesting that the accumulation of VAT, which is more abundant in men than in women, is positively associated with EC incidence [83]. In addition, another genome-wide meta-analysis identified two female-specific and three male-specific loci associated with the risk of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, which could contribute to sex disparities in EC susceptibility [84].

3.2. Sex Differences in Liver Cancer Incidence

Liver cancer (LC) is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of all LC cases and is prevalent in men, with a male-to-female incidence ratio of 1.3–5.5:1 [85]. Risk factors for HCC include hepatitis B or C viral infection, alcohol consumption, aflatoxin exposure, and obesity [1,3,86]. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which are also associated with obesity and metabolic disorders, increase the risk of HCC [87,88]. Another study reported that lifestyle risk factors such as alcohol consumption and obesity were closely related to the incidence of HCC in North America and Europe [89]. A meta-analysis of 11 cohort studies reported that individuals with obesity showed associations with LC risk (relative risk (RR) = 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51–2.36), with a higher RR of LC in men with obesity (RR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.83–3.20) than in women with obesity (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.37–2.03); however, only three of these studies adjusted their analyses for alcohol consumption [90]. In a European cohort study, the strongest association was found between WHR and HCC risk [91]. Several studies have reported a positive association between higher BMI and HCC incidence. Men showed a stronger association between higher BMI and HCC risk than women [92,93]; in some studies, the association between higher BMI and HCC risk was only observed in men [94,95]. In addition, visceral fat accumulation was found to be an independent risk factor for HCC recurrence in HCC patients with suspected NASH [96]. Overall, the strong positive relationship between obesity and HCC incidence in men might be explained by the sex disparities in visceral fat deposition. VAT induces the production of not only proinflammatory adipokines, such as leptin, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1, but also immune cell infiltration [97]. VAT also induces a decrease in adiponectin levels and stimulates the release of FFA, which leads to the development of NAFLD and HCC [97].
In general, the incidence and prognosis of NAFLD, NASH, and HCC show different trends according to age and sex. Among younger patients, the prevalence of NAFLD and NASH is higher in men than in women. However, in women, the prevalence of NAFLD gradually increases with age, and the prevalence of NASH is higher in women aged >50–60 years than in men aged >50–60 years [98,99]. In a retrospective study of 1110 patients diagnosed with HCC between 2008 and 2017 (23.5% women), women showed a significantly better prognosis than men [100]. In particular, women aged <65 years showed longer overall survival (OS) than men aged <65 years (18.3 vs. 11.2 months), while there was no significant difference in OS between women aged ≥65 years and men aged ≥65 years (15.5 vs. 15.7 months) [100]. Similarly, another study also demonstrated sex differences in the OS of female HCC patients by age. In 34,674 HCC patients (24% women), sex was a protective factor for OS in patients aged 18–44 years, while no significant difference was observed in sex and OS among patients aged >65 years [101].

3.2.1. Hormonal Factors

It appears that sex discrepancies in the incidence of HCC and OS of HCC patients are associated with exposure to sex hormones such as estrogen and androgen. An animal study using the krasV12 transgenic zebrafish model found that male fish showed faster HCC development with more severe and advanced features than female fish. In this study, estrogen treatment inhibited HCC progression in both sexes while androgen treatment enhanced it [102]. A growing number of studies have reported the protective roles of estrogen in the development and progression of HCC. In a mouse model lacking the ability to produce estrogen, 17β-estradiol treatment decreased hepatic steatosis and increased fatty acid β-oxidation, suggesting that estrogen is involved in the regulation of hepatic lipid homeostasis [103]. Estrogen treatment reduces lung metastasis in rats with HCC by inhibiting the expression of IL-6 and hepatocyte growth factor [104]. It has also been demonstrated that estrogen suppresses HCC progression through ER-α-induced inhibition of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, which in turn decreases invasion and proliferation and increases apoptosis [105]. ER-α stimulates protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O, which is associated with the inactivation of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 3; this partly explains the sex disparity in HCC risk [106].
Conversely, a nested case-control study revealed that plasma testosterone levels were positively related to the risk of HCC among men [107]. In addition, androgens have been shown to induce the development and progression of HCC. Androgen acts mainly via the AR, which is upregulated in HCC tissue compared to that in normal liver tissue. Transgenic mice of both sexes lacking hepatic AR showed attenuation of HCC development, suggesting that AR expression increases HCC risk possibly by increasing oxidative stress and DNA damage and reducing p53-mediated DNA repair and apoptosis [108]. In another zebrafish model, liver-specific ar knockout also inhibited early HCC development, and androgen treatment stimulated HCC growth only in fish not lacking liver-specific ar, indicating that androgen-AR signaling plays a crucial role in HCC development [109].

3.2.2. Genetic Factors

There has been growing evidence that genetic factors also contribute to sex differences in HCC susceptibility. Glycine N-methyltransferase (GNMT), which inhibits Wnt signaling, is known to be downregulated in HCC [110]. A previous animal study using Gnmt/ mice demonstrated that female mice showed an increased risk of HCC compared with male mice. In addition, male and female mice showed distinct gene expression profiles for HCC tissues. Several genes involved in the MAPK pathway were upregulated only in female Gnmt/ mice [111]. Furthermore, a sex-stratified analysis has revealed sex-specific etiologically relevant genes and biological pathways in HCC tumors [112]. PPAR pathway enrichment was observed in women, whereas other signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and IL-2 pathways, were enriched in men. This study also found that 24.3% of discovered germline variants differentially modulated HCC gene expression in a sex-specific manner, indicating sex differences in the etiology of HCC [112].

3.3. Sex Differences in Colorectal Cancer Incidence

Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common cancer in women. CRC is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in both sexes [113]. It is known that the intake of processed/red meat, alcohol consumption, low intake of fruits and starchy vegetables, and smoking are risk factors for CRC [1,3]. Furthermore, there is a growing body of evidence showing that obesity increases the risk of CRC development and progression [114,115,116,117]. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the association between obesity and CRC incidence is stronger in men than in women [118,119]. A meta-analysis also reported that obesity at an age of <20 years was more likely to increase the risk of CRC in adulthood in men than in women [120]. Similarly, overweight men, both in childhood and early adulthood (17–26 years), showed a 2.7-fold greater risk of colon cancer than those with a consistently normal body weight [121]. These findings suggest the importance of the timing of onset and duration of overweight and obesity in terms of CRC risk.
In addition, a Mendelian randomization study revealed that higher BMI was associated with increased CRC risk only in men, whereas a higher WHR was more closely correlated with CRC risk in women than in men [122]. WC, not BMI, was also positively related to CRC risk in postmenopausal women, which might be associated with VAT accumulation [123]. Indeed, a cross-sectional study found that visceral fat mass determined by computed tomography was positively associated with CRC incidence in postmenopausal women [124]. Studies have found that a higher percentage of VAT was strongly related to CRC risk in both sexes [125] or only in men [126]. A transcriptomic analysis of human VAT and SAT demonstrated that genes associated with cytokines including IL-6, IL-8, and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2; cell adhesion; and metabolic homeostasis (gene for IGF-1) were upregulated in VAT compared to those in SAT, and a larger fat area was related to enhanced stimulation of inflammatory pathways [127]. An in vitro study using visceral adipocytes from individuals with obesity and CRC found that visceral adipocytes induce immune dysfunctions, including an increase in proinflammatory factor levels and immunosuppressive signals, leading to the development of CRC [128].
Sex differences also exist in CRC survival. A meta-analysis revealed that female CRC patients had better OS than male patients [129]; notably, female patients aged <45 years [130]. Consistent with this finding, young women (<50 years) showed better OS than young men, while older women (≥65 years) showed poorer OS than their male counterparts [131]. Therefore, based on the sex discrepancies in CRC prognosis observed before and after menopause, estrogen might have beneficial effects on CRC risk.

3.3.1. Hormonal Factors

Estrogen functions through binding with ERs, such as ER-α and ER-β. ER-α is involved in the activation of STAT, PI3K, and MAPK signaling pathways, thus increasing CRC risk [132]. In contrast, ER-β activation reduces cell proliferation and induces apoptosis [133]. ER-α is highly expressed in CRC tissues, while ER-β is common in normal colon tissues [132,134]. It has been noted that estrogen affects the risk of CRC depending on the stage of CRC development; estrogen enhances ER-β expression to inhibit colon tumorigenesis in the early disease stages, whereas in the late disease stages, it stimulates ER-α expression, resulting in tumor progression [132]. Thus, it appears that obesity-induced elevation in estrogen levels might have a protective effect on CRC risk through the activation of ER-β [114,132]. In addition, the administration of exogenous estrogens (hormone replacement therapy) shows a protective effect against CRC [135]. A transcriptomic study has suggested that estrogen regulates the colon environment in a state of high-fat diet-induced obesity in a sex-specific manner [136]. A high-fat diet disrupts clock genes and increases macrophage infiltration in both male and female mice, while it also promotes epithelial cell proliferation in male mice. ER-β activation reverses these alterations, indicating that estrogen might play a protective role against the risk of obesity-associated CRC [136].

3.3.2. Genetic Factors

Sex-specific biological disparities have been reported in the location and molecular features of CRC. Proximal (right-sided) colon cancer, which is more common among women, is characterized by microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype+, BRAF mutations, and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Meanwhile, distal (left-sided) colon cancer, which is more prevalent in men, is linked to chromosomal instability, p53 mutations, EGFR/Wnt signaling, and familial adenomatous polyposis [137,138]. In patients with stage III CRC, survival after adjuvant therapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin was influenced by the TP53 genotype only in women [139]. Furthermore, the polymorphisms of vascular endothelial growth factor and lncRNA prostate cancer non-coding RNA were positively associated with CRC risk only in women [140,141].
It has been reported that there are sex-specific associations between the colonic expression of clock and clock control genes and survival of CRC patients [142]. Circadian disruption is known to promote tumor growth and decrease survival in cancer patients [143]. In women, low cry2 expression and high ER-β expression were associated with better survival, while low vegf-a gene expression in tumors was associated with longer survival in men [142].

3.3.3. Gut Microbiota

There is growing evidence that dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is linked to CRC risk [114,144,145]. One study reported similarities in gut microbiota composition between obesity and CRC patients. The proportions of Hafnia alvei (Proteobacteria phylum) and Akkermansia muciniphila (Verrucomicrobia phylum), known as mucin degraders, increased in both patient groups. This result indicates that the microbiome in a state of obesity might be associated with inflammation and cell damage induction, thus leading to an increased risk of CRC development [146]. Another animal study also found that sex-specific interactions between an obesogenic diet and the microbiota contributed to CRC development by reprograming of the intestinal epigenomes [147]. Furthermore, sex-specific differences in gut microbiota have been reported in an animal model of high-fat diet-induced obesity. Among old rats, the proportions of Akkermansia muciniphila and Desulfovibrio spp. increased in response to a high-fat diet only in female rats, suggesting that sex dimorphisms in the composition of the gut microbiota may be related to sex differences in inflammation and colon tumorigenesis [148].

4. Conclusions

Many epidemiological and experimental studies have indicated that there are sex differences in the incidence of cancer, including esophageal, liver, and colon cancers (Figure 2). Obesity is a common and highly convincing risk factor for many cancers, including major gastrointestinal cancers; therefore, sex disparities in body fat distribution and the regulatory mechanisms involved in energy homeostasis are suggested to contribute to sex differences in cancer incidence. The role of estrogen in body fat accumulation is the most well-understood mechanistic explanation for sex differences in obesity-associated cancers. Other genetic factors have been shown to contribute to sex differences in the incidence of major gastrointestinal cancer, although their association with obesity needs further investigation. The establishment of successful practices for personalized cancer prevention and treatment may require a clear understanding of sex-related biological differences in cancer risk.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-E.K. and M.-K.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-W.H., S.-E.K. and M.-K.S.; writing—review and editing, S.-E.K. and M.-K.S.; supervision, S.-E.K. and M.-K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Support Program for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology through the Center for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (WISET) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) (WISET202003GI01) and the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1A02086112 to M.-K.S.). This work was also supported by the NRF grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2020R1C1C1007553 to S.-E.K.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ARandrogen receptor
BMIbody mass index
CIconfidence interval
CRCcolorectal cancer
ECesophageal cancer
EGFRepidermal growth factor receptor
ERestrogen receptor
FFAsfree fatty acids
GWASgenome-wide association studies
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
IGF-1insulin-like growth factor 1
ILinterleukin
LCliver cancer
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinase
MIFmigration inhibitory factor
NAFLDnon-alcoholic fatty liver disease
NASHnon-alcoholic steatohepatitis
OSoverall survival
MAPKmitogen-activated protein kinases
POMCpro-opiomelanocortin
PPARperoxisome proliferator-activated receptor
RRrelative risk
SATsubcutaneous adipose tissue
STATsignal transducers and activators of transcription
TGtriacylglyceride
VATvisceral adipose tissue
WCwaist circumference
WHRwaist–hip ratio

References

  1. Wild, C.P.; Weiderpass, E.; Stewart, B.W. (Eds.) World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. An, R.; Xiang, X. Age–period–cohort analyses of obesity prevalence in US adults. Public Health 2016, 141, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Cancer: A Global Perspective; Continuous Update Project Expert Report; WCRF International: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng, T.; Lyon, C.J.; Bergin, S.; Caligiuri, M.A.; Hsueh, W. Obesity, Inflammation, and Cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 2016, 11, 421–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Calle, E.E.; Kaaks, R. Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2004, 4, 579–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight (accessed on 29 July 2020).
  7. Null, N. Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: A pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 2016, 387, 1377–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. D’Eon, T.M.; Souza, S.C.; Aronovitz, M.; Obin, M.S.; Fried, S.K.; Greenberg, A.S. Estrogen Regulation of Adiposity and Fuel Partitioning. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 35983–35991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Fried, S.K.; Lee, M.-J.; Karastergiou, K. Shaping fat distribution: New insights into the molecular determinants of depot and sex-dependent adipose biology. Obesity 2015, 23, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Smith, S.R.; Lovejoy, J.C.; Greenway, F.; Ryan, D.; Dejonge, L.; De La Bretonne, J.; Volafova, J.; Bray, G.A. Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. Metabolism 2001, 50, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weisberg, S.P.; McCann, D.; Desai, M.; Rosenbaum, M.; Leibel, R.L.; Ferrante, A.W., Jr. Obesity is associated with macrophage accumulation in adipose tissue. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 112, 1796–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. De Vries, G.J.; Rissman, E.F.; Simerly, R.B.; Yang, L.-Y.; Scordalakes, E.M.; Auger, C.J.; Swain, A.; Lovell-Badge, R.; Burgoyne, P.S.; Arnold, A.P. A Model System for Study of Sex Chromosome Effects on Sexually Dimorphic Neural and Behavioral Traits. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 9005–9014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Medrikova, D.; Jilkova, Z.M.; Bardova, K.; Janovska, P.; Rossmeisl, M.; Kopecky, J. Sex differences during the course of diet-induced obesity in mice: Adipose tissue expandability and glycemic control. Int. J. Obes. 2012, 36, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Au-Yong, I.T.; Thorn, N.; Ganatra, R.H.; Perkins, A.C.; Symonds, M. Brown Adipose Tissue and Seasonal Variation in Humans. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2583–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  15. Lobo, R.A. Metabolic syndrome after menopause and the role of hormones. Maturitas 2008, 60, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, C.F.; Shah, N.M. Representing Sex in the Brain, One Module at a Time. Neuron 2014, 82, 261–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Xu, Y.; Nedungadi, T.P.; Zhu, L.; Sobhani, N.; Irani, B.G.; Davis, K.E.; Zhang, X.; Zou, F.; Gent, L.M.; Hahner, L.D.; et al. Distinct Hypothalamic Neurons Mediate Estrogenic Effects on Energy Homeostasis and Reproduction. Cell Metab. 2011, 14, 453–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Cao, J.; Patisaul, H.B. Sexually dimorphic expression of hypothalamic estrogen receptors α and β and kiss1 in neonatal male and female rats. J. Comp. Neurol. 2011, 519, 2954–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  19. Kyi-Tha-Thu, C.; Okoshi, K.; Ito, H.; Matsuda, K.-I.; Kawata, M.; Tsukahara, S. Sex differences in cells expressing green fluorescent protein under the control of the estrogen receptor-α promoter in the hypothalamus of mice. Neurosci. Res. 2015, 101, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dumesic, D.A.; Akopians, A.L.; Madrigal, V.K.; Ramirez, E.; Margolis, D.J.; Sarma, M.K.; Thomas, A.M.; Grogan, T.R.; Haykal, R.; Schooler, T.A.; et al. Hyperandrogenism Accompanies Increased Intra-Abdominal Fat Storage in Normal Weight Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 4178–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jørgensen, J.O.L.; Vahl, N.; Hansen, T.B.; Fisker, S.; Hagen, C.; Christiansen, J.S. Influence of Growth Hormone and Androgens on Body Composition in Adults. Horm. Res. 1996, 45, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asarian, L.; Geary, N. Modulation of appetite by gonadal steroid hormones. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  23. Clegg, D.; Brown, L.M.; Woods, S.C.; Benoit, S.C. Gonadal Hormones Determine Sensitivity to Central Leptin and Insulin. Diabetes 2006, 55, 978–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  24. Lu, S.-F.; McKenna, S.E.; Cologer-Clifford, A.; Nau, E.A.; Simon, N.G. Androgen Receptor in Mouse Brain: Sex Differences and Similarities in Autoregulation 1. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Klaver, M.; De Blok, C.J.M.; Wiepjes, C.M.; Nota, N.M.; Dekker, M.J.H.J.; De Mutsert, R.; Schreiner, T.; Fisher, A.D.; T’Sjoen, G.; Heijer, M.D. Changes in regional body fat, lean body mass and body shape in trans persons using cross-sex hormonal therapy: Results from a multicenter prospective study. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 178, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Papadakis, G.; Hans, D.; Rodriguez, E.G.; Vollenweider, P.; Waeber, G.; Marques-Vidal, P.; Lamy, O. Menopausal Hormone Therapy Is Associated With Reduced Total and Visceral Adiposity: The OsteoLaus Cohort. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 103, 1948–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jensen, M.D. Gender differences in regional fatty acid metabolism before and after meal ingestion. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 96, 2297–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  28. Nielsen, S.; Guo, Z.; Johnson, C.M.; Hensrud, D.D.; Jensen, M.D. Splanchnic lipolysis in human obesity. J. Clin. Investig. 2004, 113, 1582–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Burguera, B.; Proctor, D.; Dietz, N.; Guo, Z.; Joyner, M.; Jensen, M.D. Leg free fatty acid kinetics during exercise in men and women. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 2000, 278, E113–E117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Marin, P.; Lönn, L.B.; Andersson, B.; Odén, B.; Olbe, L.; A Bengtsson, B.; Björntorp, P. Assimilation of triglycerides in subcutaneous and intraabdominal adipose tissues In Vivo in men: Effects of testosterone. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 1018–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Votruba, S.B.; Jensen, M.D. Short-term regional meal fat storage in nonobese humans is not a predictor of long-term regional fat gain. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 2012, 302, E1078–E1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Santosa, S.; Jensen, M.D. Adipocyte Fatty Acid Storage Factors Enhance Subcutaneous Fat Storage in Postmenopausal Women. Diabetes 2012, 62, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Pulit, S.L.; Karaderi, T.; Lindgren, C.M. Sexual dimorphisms in genetic loci linked to body fat distribution. Biosci. Rep. 2017, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Dongen, J.; Willemsen, G.; Chen, W.-M.; De Geus, E.J.C.; Boomsma, D.I. Heritability of metabolic syndrome traits in a large population-based sample. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2914–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  35. Lindgren, C.; Heid, I.; Randall, J.; Lamina, C.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Qi, L.; Speliotes, E.; Thorleifsson, G.; Willer, C.; Herrera, B.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Scan Meta-Analysis Identifies Three Loci Influencing Adiposity and Fat Distribution. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Locke, A.E.; Kahali, B.; Berndt, S.I.; Justice, A.E.; Pers, T.H.; Day, F.R.; Powell, C.; Vedantam, S.; Buchkovich, M.L.; Yang, J.; et al. Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 2015, 518, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  37. Shungin, D.; Winkler, T.W.; Croteau-Chonka, D.C.; Ferreira, T.; Locke, A.E.; Mägi, R.; Strawbridge, R.J.; Pers, T.H.; Fischer, K.; Justice, A.E.; et al. New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 518, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  38. Heid, I.M.; Jackson, A.U.; Randall, J.C.; Winkler, T.W.; Qi, L.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; Thorleifsson, G.; Zillikens, M.C.; Speliotes, E.K.; Magi, R. Meta-analysis identifies 13 new loci associated with waist-hip ratio and reveals sexual dimorphism in the genetic basis of fat distribution. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 949–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. Grove, K.L.; Fried, S.K.; Greenberg, A.S.; Xiao, X.Q.; Clegg, D.J. A microarray analysis of sexual dimorphism of adipose tissues in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice. Int. J. Obes. 2010, 34, 989–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  40. Yang, X.; Schadt, E.E.; Wang, S.; Wang, H.; Arnold, A.P.; Ingram-Drake, L.; Drake, T.A.; Lusis, A.J. Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 2006, 16, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Koopman, P. The delicate balance between male and female sex determining pathways: Potential for disruption of early steps in sexual development. Int. J. Androl. 2010, 33, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wells, J.C. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 21, 415–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Taylor, B.J.; Grant, A.M.; Williams, S.M.; Goulding, A. Sex Differences in Regional Body Fat Distribution from Pre to Postpuberty. Obesity 2010, 18, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, X.; McClusky, R.; Chen, J.; Beaven, S.W.; Tontonoz, P.; Arnold, A.P.; Reue, K. The Number of X Chromosomes Causes Sex Differences in Adiposity in Mice. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  45. Lagerlöf, O.; Slocomb, J.E.; Hong, I.; Aponte, Y.; Blackshaw, S.; Hart, G.W.; Huganir, R.L. The nutrient sensor OGT in PVN neurons regulates feeding. Science 2016, 351, 1293–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  46. Nonogaki, K.; Strack, A.M.; Dallman, M.F.; Tecott, L.H. Leptin-independent hyperphagia and type 2 diabetes in mice with a mutated serotonin 5-HT2C receptor gene. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 1152–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Harno, E.; Ramamoorthy, T.G.; Coll, A.P.; White, A. POMC: The Physiological Power of Hormone Processing. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 2381–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Millington, G.W. The role of proopiomelanocortin (POMC) neurones in feeding behaviour. Nutr. Metab. 2007, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Nohara, K.; Zhang, Y.; Waraich, R.S.; Laque, A.; Tiano, J.P.; Tong, J.; Münzberg, H.; Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Early-Life Exposure to Testosterone Programs the Hypothalamic Melanocortin System. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Su, X.; Gi, Y.J.; Chakravarti, D.; Chan, I.L.; Zhang, A.; Xia, X.; Tsai, K.Y.; Flores, E.R. TAp63 Is a Master Transcriptional Regulator of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism. Cell Metab. 2012, 16, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  51. Ramadori, G.; Fujikawa, T.; Fukuda, M.; Anderson, J.; Morgan, D.A.; Mostoslavsky, R.; Stuart, R.C.; Perello, M.; Vianna, C.R.; Nillni, E.A.; et al. SIRT1 Deacetylase in POMC Neurons Is Required for Homeostatic Defenses against Diet-Induced Obesity. Cell Metab. 2010, 12, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  52. Samuel, P.; Khan, M.A.; Nag, S.; Inagami, T.; Hussain, T. Angiotensin AT(2) Receptor Contributes towards Gender Bias in Weight Gain. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e48425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, L.; Hossain, M.A.; Sadat, S.; Hager, L.; Liu, L.; Tam, L.; Schroer, S.; Huogen, L.; Fantus, I.G.; Connelly, P.W.; et al. Lecithin Cholesterol Acyltransferase Null Mice Are Protected from Diet-induced Obesity and Insulin Resistance in a Gender-specific Manner through Multiple Pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 17809–17820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Kamangar, F.; Nasrollahzadeh, D.; Safiri, S.; Sepanlou, S.G.; Fitzmaurice, C.; Ikuta, K.S.; Bisignano, C.; Islami, F.; Roshandel, G.; Lim, S.S.; et al. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 582–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Arnold, M.; Laversanne, M.; Brown, L.M.; Devesa, S.S.; Bray, F. Predicting the Future Burden of Esophageal Cancer by Histological Subtype: International Trends in Incidence up to 2030. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 112, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Murphy, C.C.; Yang, Y.C.; Shaheen, N.J.; Hofstetter, W.L.; Sandler, R.S. An age-period-cohort analysis of obesity and incident esophageal adenocarcinoma among white males. Dis. Esophagus 2017, 30, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  57. He, H.; Chen, N.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Fu, J. Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with esophageal cancer: A SEER database analysis. Thorac. Cancer 2020, 11, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lovegrove, C. Obesity is linked with increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Nat. Clin. Pr. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005, 2, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tian, J.; Zuo, C.; Liu, G.; Che, P.; Li, G.; Li, X.; Chen, H. Cumulative evidence for the relationship between body mass index and the risk of esophageal cancer: An updated meta-analysis with evidence from 25 observational studies. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 35, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xie, S.-H.; Lagergren, J. Risk factors for oesophageal cancer. Best Pr. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2018, 36–37, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Turati, F.; Tramacere, I.; La Vecchia, C.; Negri, E. A meta-analysis of body mass index and esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2012, 24, 609–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kubo, A.; Cook, M.B.; Shaheen, N.J.; Vaughan, T.L.; Whiteman, D.C.; Murray, L.; A Corley, D. Sex-specific associations between body mass index, waist circumference and the risk of Barrett’s oesophagus: A pooled analysis from the international BEACON consortium. Gut 2013, 62, 1684–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  63. Corley, D.A.; Kubo, A.; Zhao, W. Abdominal Obesity and the Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cardia Carcinomas. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  64. Arnold, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Ferlay, J.; Forman, D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut 2015, 64, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  65. Doyle, S.L.; Donohoe, C.L.; Finn, S.P.; Howard, J.M.; Lithander, F.E.; Reynolds, J.V.; Pidgeon, G.P.; Lysaght, J. IGF-1 and Its Receptor in Esophageal Cancer: Association with Adenocarcinoma and Visceral Obesity. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 107, 196–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fowler, A.J.; Richer, A.L.; Bremner, R.M.; Inge, L.J. A high-fat diet is associated with altered adipokine production and a more aggressive esophageal adenocarcinoma phenotype In Vivo. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2015, 149, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  67. Zhang, Y.; Chua, S. Leptin Function and Regulation. Compr. Physiol. 2017, 8, 351–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ogunwobi, O.; Mutungi, G.; Beales, I.L.P. Leptin Stimulates Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis in Barrett’s Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells by Cyclooxygenase-2-Dependent, Prostaglandin-E2-Mediated Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation. Endocrinology 2006, 147, 4505–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kendall, B.J.; Macdonald, G.A.; Hayward, N.K.; Prins, J.B.; Brown, I.; Walker, N.; Pandeya, N.; Green, A.C.; Webb, P.M.; Whiteman, D.C.; et al. Leptin and the risk of Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut 2007, 57, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Montague, C.T.; Prins, J.B.; Sanders, L.; Digby, J.E.; O’Rahilly, S. Depot and Sex-Specific Differences in Human Leptin mRNA Expression: Implications for the Control of Regional Fat Distribution. Diabetes 1997, 46, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Petrick, J.L.; Hyland, P.L.; Caron, P.; Falk, R.T.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Dawsey, S.M.; Abnet, C.C.; Taylor, P.R.; Weinstein, S.J.; Albanes, D.; et al. Associations Between Prediagnostic Concentrations of Circulating Sex Steroid Hormones and Esophageal/Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma Among Men. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2018, 111, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  72. Petrick, J.L.; Falk, R.T.; Hyland, P.L.; Caron, P.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Wood, S.N.; Dawsey, S.M.; Abnet, C.C.; Taylor, P.R.; Guillemette, C.; et al. Association between circulating levels of sex steroid hormones and esophageal adenocarcinoma in the FINBAR Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0190325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  73. Lagergren, K.; Lagergren, J.; Brusselaers, N. Hormone replacement therapy and oral contraceptives and risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 2183–2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Brusselaers, N.; Maret-Ouda, J.; Konings, P.; El-Serag, H.B.; Lagergren, P. Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  75. Coleman, H.G.; Xie, S.-H.; Lagergren, J. The Epidemiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 390–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jenks, M.Z.; Fairfield, H.E.; Johnson, E.C.; Morrison, R.F.; Muday, G.K. Sex Steroid Hormones Regulate Leptin Transcript Accumulation and Protein Secretion in 3T3-L1 Cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kim, M.-S.; Chae, H.-J.; Shin, T.-Y.; Kim, H.-M.; Kim, H.-R. Estrogen Regulates Cytokine Release in Human Mast Cells. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2001, 23, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Masaka, T.; Iijima, K.; Endo, H.; Asanuma, K.; Ara, N.; Ishiyama, F.; Asano, N.; Koike, T.; Imatani, A.; Shimosegawa, T. Gender differences in oesophageal mucosal injury in a reflux oesophagitis model of rats. Gut 2013, 62, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ashcroft, G.S.; Mills, S.J.; Lei, K.; Gibbons, L.; Jeong, M.-J.; Taniguchi, M.; Burow, M.; Horan, M.A.; Wahl, S.M.; Nakayama, T. Estrogen modulates cutaneous wound healing by downregulating macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  80. Nishihira, J. Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF): Its Essential Role in the Immune System and Cell Growth. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2000, 20, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Honda, J.; Iijima, K.; Asanuma, K.; Ara, N.; Shiroki, T.; Kondo, Y.; Hatta, W.; Uno, K.; Asano, N.; Koike, T.; et al. Estrogen Enhances Esophageal Barrier Function by Potentiating Occludin Expression. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2015, 61, 1028–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lin, Y.; Yngve, A.; Lagergren, P.; Lu, Y. A dietary pattern rich in lignans, quercetin and resveratrol decreases the risk of oesophageal cancer. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  83. Böhmer, A.C.; Hecker, J.; Schröder, J.; Gharahkhani, P.; May, A.; Gerges, C.; Anders, M.; Becker, J.; Hess, T.; Kreuser, N.; et al. Shared Genetic Etiology of Obesity-Related Traits and Barrett’s Esophagus/Adenocarcinoma: Insights from Genome-Wide Association Studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2019, 29, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dong, J.; Maj, C.; Tsavachidis, S.; Ostrom, Q.T.; Gharahkhani, P.; Anderson, L.A.; Wu, A.H.; Ye, W.; Bernstein, L.; Borisov, O.; et al. Sex-Specific Genetic Associations for Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 2020, 159, 2065–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Petrick, J.L.; Braunlin, M.; Laversanne, M.; Valery, P.C.; Bray, F.; McGlynn, K.A. International trends in liver cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype, 1978–2007. Int. J. Cancer 2016, 139, 1534–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  86. Jelic, S.; Sotiropoulos, G.C. On behalf of the ESMO Guidelines Working Group Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21 (Suppl. 5), v59–v64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Michelotti, G.A.; Machado, M.V.; Diehl, A.M. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 10, 656–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Rinella, M.E. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A systematic review. JAMA 2015, 313, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Baecker, A.; Liu, X.; La Vecchia, C.; Zhang, Z.-F. Worldwide incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma cases attributable to major risk factors. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2018, 27, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Larsson, S.C.; Wolk, A. Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br. J. Cancer 2007, 97, 1005–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schlesinger, S.; Aleksandrova, K.; Pischon, T.; Fedirko, V.; Jenab, M.; Trepo, E.; Boffetta, P.; Dahm, C.C.; Overvad, K.; Tjønneland, A.; et al. Abdominal obesity, weight gain during adulthood and risk of liver and biliary tract cancer in a European cohort. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 645–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Saunders, D.; Seidel, D.; Allison, M.; Lyratzopoulos, G. Systematic review: The association between obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma—Epidemiologic evidence. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010, 31, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Yan, Z.-P.; Luo, J. Excess body weight and the risk of primary liver cancer: An updated meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 2137–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Renehan, A.G.; Tyson, M.; Egger, M.; Heller, R.F.; Zwahlen, M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 2008, 371, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Setiawan, V.W.; Lim, U.; Lipworth, L.; Lu, S.C.; Shepherd, J.; Ernst, T.; Wilkens, L.R.; Henderson, B.E.; Le Marchand, L. Sex and Ethnic Differences in the Association of Obesity With Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 14, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  96. Ohki, T.; Tateishi, R.; Shiina, S.; Goto, E.; Sato, T.; Nakagawa, H.; Masuzaki, R.; Goto, T.; Hamamura, K.; Kanai, F.; et al. Visceral fat accumulation is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after curative treatment in patients with suspected NASH. Gut 2009, 58, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  97. Cheung, O.K.-W.; Cheng, A.S. Gender Differences in Adipocyte Metabolism and Liver Cancer Progression. Front. Genet. 2016, 7, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Hashimoto, E.; Tokushige, K. Prevalence, gender, ethnic variations, and prognosis of NASH. J. Gastroenterol. 2010, 46, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Wu, E.M.; Wong, L.L.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Ji, J.-F.; Jia, W.; Kwee, S.A.; Kalathil, S. Gender differences in hepatocellular cancer: Disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis and liver transplantation. Hepatoma Res. 2018, 4, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Rich, N.E.; Murphy, C.C.; Yopp, A.C.; Tiro, J.; Marrero, J.A.; Singal, A.G. Sex disparities in presentation and prognosis of 1110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 52, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yang, D.; Hanna, D.L.; Usher, J.; Lococo, J.; Chaudhari, P.; Lenz, H.-J.; Setiawan, V.W.; El-Khoueiry, A. Impact of sex on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis. Cancer 2014, 120, 3707–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, Y.; Li, H.; Spitsbergen, J.M.; Gong, Z. Males develop faster and more severe hepatocellular carcinoma than females in krasV12 transgenic zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep41280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Nemoto, Y.; Toda, K.; Ono, M.; Fujikawa-Adachi, K.; Saibara, T.; Onishi, S.; Enzan, H.; Okada, T.; Shizuta, Y. Altered expression of fatty acid–metabolizing enzymes in aromatase-deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2000, 105, 1819–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  104. Wang, Y.-C.; Xu, G.; Jia, W.-D.; Han, S.-J.; Ren, W.-H.; Wang, W.; Liu, W.-B.; Zhang, C.-H.; Chen, H. Estrogen Suppresses Metastasis in Rat Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Decreasing Interleukin-6 and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Expression. Inflammation 2012, 35, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xu, H.; Wei, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Han, X.; Tan, R.; Shen, P. Oestrogen attenuates tumour progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2012, 228, 216–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hou, J.; Xu, J.; Jiang, R.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Deng, L.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Sun, B. Estrogen-sensitive PTPRO expression represses hepatocellular carcinoma progression by control of STAT3. Hepatolgy 2013, 57, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yu, M.-W.; Yang, Y.-C.; Yang, S.-Y.; Cheng, S.-W.; Liaw, Y.-F.; Lin, S.-M.; Chen, C.-J. Hormonal Markers and Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study among Men. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2001, 93, 1644–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  108. Ma, C.-L.; Hsu, C.; Wu, M.; Wu, C.; Wu, C.; Lai, J.; Jou, Y.; Cheng-Lung, H.; Yeh, S.; Chang, C. Androgen Receptor Is a New Potential Therapeutic Target for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  109. Li, H.; Li, Y.; Lu, J.-W.; Huo, X.; Gong, Z. Liver-specific androgen receptor knockout attenuates early liver tumor development in zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, Y.-M.A.; Shiu, J.-Y.A.; Tzeng, S.J.; Shih, L.-S.; Lui, W.-Y.; Chen, P.-H. Characterization of glycine-N-methyltransferase-gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer 1998, 75, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liao, Y.-J.; Liu, S.-P.; Lee, C.-M.; Yen, C.-H.; Chuang, P.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Tsai, T.-F.; Huang, S.-F.; Lee, Y.-H.W.; Chen, Y.-M.A. Characterization of a glycine N-methyltransferase gene knockout mouse model for hepatocellular carcinoma: Implications of the gender disparity in liver cancer susceptibility. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Natri, H.M.; Wilson, M.A.; Buetow, K.H. Distinct molecular etiologies of male and female hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2019, 19, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  113. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  114. Ye, P.; Xi, Y.; Huang, Z.; Xu, P. Linking Obesity with Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology and Mechanistic Insights. Cancers 2020, 12, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bardou, M.; Barkun, A.N.; Martel, M. Obesity and colorectal cancer. Gut 2013, 62, 933–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Vazzana, N.; Riondino, S.; Toto, V.; Guadagni, F.; Roselli, M.; Davì, G.; Ferroni, P. Obesity-Driven Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 5837–5853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Riondino, S.; Roselli, M.; Palmirotta, R.; Della-Morte, D.; Ferroni, P.; Guadagni, F. Obesity and colorectal cancer: Role of adipokines in tumor initiation and progression. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 5177–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kim, H.; Giovannucci, E.L. Sex differences in the association of obesity and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 2017, 28, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Colditz, G.A.; Peterson, L.L. Obesity and Cancer: Evidence, Impact, and Future Directions. Clin. Chem. 2018, 64, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  120. Garcia, H.; Song, M. Early-life obesity and adulthood colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis. Rev. Panam. Salud Pública 2019, 43, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  121. Jensen, B.W.; Bjerregaard, L.G.; Ängquist, L.; Gögenur, I.; Renehan, A.G.; Osler, M.; Sørensen, T.I.; Baker, J.L. Change in weight status from childhood to early adulthood and late adulthood risk of colon cancer in men: A population-based cohort study. Int. J. Obes. 2018, 42, 1797–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bull, C.J.; Bell, J.A.; Murphy, N.; Sanderson, E.; Smith, G.D.; Timpson, N.J.; Banbury, B.L.; Albanes, D.; Berndt, S.I.; Bézieau, S.; et al. Adiposity, metabolites, and colorectal cancer risk: Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kabat, G.C.; Kim, M.Y.; Stefanick, M.; Ho, G.Y.; Lane, D.S.; Odegaard, A.O.; Simon, M.S.; Bea, J.W.; Luo, J.; Wassertheil-Smoller, S.; et al. Metabolic obesity phenotypes and risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 143, 543–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  124. Lee, J.-Y.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, D.-C.; Chu, S.-H.; Jeon, J.Y.; Kim, N.-K.; Lee, J.-W. Visceral Fat Accumulation Is Associated with Colorectal Cancer in Postmenopausal Women. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  125. Kim, B.; Kim, B.C.; Nam, S.Y.; Nam, J.H.; Ryu, K.H.; Park, B.J.; Sohn, D.K.; Hong, C.W.; Han, K.S.; Kim, H.B. Visceral Adipose Tissue Volume and the Occurrence of Colorectal Adenoma in Follow-up Colonoscopy for Screening and Surveillance. Nutr. Cancer 2017, 69, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Seo, I.-K.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, B.; Choi, C.H.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, J.G.; Chang, S.K.; Kang, H. Abdominal fat distribution measured using computed tomography is associated with an increased risk of colorectal adenoma in men. Medicine 2017, 96, e8051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Haffa, M.; Holowatyj, A.N.; Kratz, M.; Toth, R.; Benner, A.; Gigic, B.; Habermann, N.; Schrotz-King, P.; Böhm, J.; Brenner, H.; et al. Transcriptome Profiling of Adipose Tissue Reveals Depot-Specific Metabolic Alterations among Patients with Colorectal Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 104, 5225–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Del Cornò, M.; D’Archivio, M.; Conti, L.; Scazzocchio, B.; Varì, R.; Donninelli, G.; Varano, B.; Giammarioli, S.; De Meo, S.; Silecchia, G.; et al. Visceral fat adipocytes from obese and colorectal cancer subjects exhibit distinct secretory and ω6 polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles and deliver immunosuppressive signals to innate immunity cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 63093–63105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  129. Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; He, J.; Ren, S.; Wu, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, F. Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 1942–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Majek, O.; Gondos, A.; Jansen, L.; Emrich, K.; Holleczek, B.; Katalinic, A.; Nennecke, A.; Eberle, A.; Brenner, H. Sex Differences in Colorectal Cancer Survival: Population-Based Analysis of 164,996 Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  131. Koo, J.H.; Jalaludin, B.; Wong, S.K.C.; Kneebone, A.; Connor, S.J.; Leong, R.W. Improved Survival in Young Women with Colorectal Cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 103, 1488–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Chen, J.; Iverson, D. Estrogen in obesity-associated colon cancer: Friend or foe? Protecting postmenopausal women but promoting late-stage colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2012, 23, 1767–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hartman, J.; Edvardsson, K.; Lindberg, K.; Zhao, C.; Williams, C.; Ström, A.; Gustafsson, J.A. Tumor Repressive Functions of Estrogen Receptor β in SW480 Colon Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 6100–6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  134. Papaxoinis, K.; Triantafyllou, K.; Sasco, A.J.; Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P.; Ladas, S.D. Subsite-specific differences of estrogen receptor beta expression in the normal colonic epithelium: Implications for carcinogenesis and colorectal cancer epidemiology. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2010, 22, 614–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Ji, J.; Sundquist, J.; Sundquist, K. Use of hormone replacement therapy improves the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer: A population-based study in Sweden. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2003–2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  136. Hases, L.; Archer, A.; Indukuri, R.; Birgersson, M.; Savva, C.; Korach-André, M.; Williams, C. High-fat diet and estrogen impacts the colon and its transcriptome in a sex-dependent manner. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Benedix, F.; Kube, R.; Meyer, F.; Schmidt, U.; Gastinger, I.; Lippert, H. Comparison of 17,641 Patients with Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Differences in Epidemiology, Perioperative Course, Histology, and Survival. Dis. Colon Rectum 2010, 53, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Kim, S.-E. Sex and gender-specific disparities in colorectal cancer risk. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 21, 5167–5175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Warren, R.S.; Atreya, C.E.; Niedzwiecki, D.; Weinberg, V.K.; Donner, D.B.; Mayer, R.J.; Goldberg, R.M.; Compton, C.C.; Zuraek, M.B.; Ye, C.; et al. Association of TP53 Mutational Status and Gender with Survival after Adjuvant Treatment for Stage III Colon Cancer: Results of CALGB 89803. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 5777–5787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  140. Bae, S.J.; Kim, J.W.; Kang, H.; Hwang, S.G.; Oh, D.; Kim, N.K. Gender-specific association between polymorphism of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF 936 C>T) gene and colon cancer in Korea. Anticancer. Res. 2008, 28, 1271–1276. [Google Scholar]
  141. Almutairi, M.; Parine, N.R.; Shaik, J.P.; Aldhaian, S.; Azzam, N.A.; Aljebreen, A.M.; Alharbi, O.; Almadi, M.A.; Al-Balbeesi, A.O.; Alanazi, M. Association between polymorphisms in PRNCR1 and risk of colorectal cancer in the Saudi population. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Hasakova, K.; Vician, M.; Reis, R.; Zeman, M.; Herichova, I. Sex-dependent correlation between survival and expression of genes related to the circadian oscillator in patients with colorectal cancer. Chronobiol. Int. 2018, 35, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Morgan, M.N.; Dvuchbabny, S.; Martinez, C.-A.; Kerr, B.; A Cistulli, P.; Cook, K.M. The Cancer Clock Is (Not) Ticking: Links between Circadian Rhythms and Cancer. Clocks Sleep 2019, 1, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  144. Alhinai, E.A.; Walton, G.E.; Commane, D.M. The Role of the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer Causation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  145. Sobhani, I.; Bergsten, E.; Couffin, S.; Amiot, A.; Nebbad, B.; Barau, C.; De’Angelis, N.; Rabot, S.; Canoui-Poitrine, F.; Mestivier, D.; et al. Colorectal cancer-associated microbiota contributes to oncogenic epigenetic signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 24285–24295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Campisciano, G.; De Manzini, N.; Delbue, S.; Cason, C.; Cosola, D.; Basile, G.; Ferrante, P.; Comar, M.; Palmisano, S. The Obesity-Related Gut Bacterial and Viral Dysbiosis Can Impact the Risk of Colon Cancer Development. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  147. Qin, Y.; Roberts, J.D.; Grimm, S.A.; Lih, F.B.; Deterding, L.J.; Li, R.; Chrysovergis, K.; Wade, P.A. An obesity-associated gut microbiome reprograms the intestinal epigenome and leads to altered colonic gene expression. Genome Biol. 2018, 19, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Lee, S.M.; Kim, N.; Yoon, H.; Nam, R.H.; Lee, D.H. Microbial Changes and Host Response in F344 Rat Colon Depending on Sex and Age Following a High-Fat Diet. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
Figure 1. Factors contributing to sex differences in obesity. More women than men in the general population are obese, possibly because of a longer life expectancy in women and a rapid increase in obesity rate in postmenopausal women than in men. Sex differences in energy metabolism are contributed by not only sex hormone but also X chromosome gene expression, and expression of other genes, such as those for POMC and angiotensin receptor II. These factors regulate energy metabolism, leading to sex differences in the incidence of obesity and obesity-associated diseases. CHD, cardiovascular heart disease; POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
Figure 1. Factors contributing to sex differences in obesity. More women than men in the general population are obese, possibly because of a longer life expectancy in women and a rapid increase in obesity rate in postmenopausal women than in men. Sex differences in energy metabolism are contributed by not only sex hormone but also X chromosome gene expression, and expression of other genes, such as those for POMC and angiotensin receptor II. These factors regulate energy metabolism, leading to sex differences in the incidence of obesity and obesity-associated diseases. CHD, cardiovascular heart disease; POMC, pro-opiomelanocortin; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue.
Ijms 22 01253 g001
Figure 2. Sex differences in the incidence of major gastrointestinal cancers associated with obesity. Men and women exhibit differences in body fat distribution and energy homeostasis regulation. Overall, visceral adipose tissue, more abundant in men than in women, is positively associated with the incidence of esophageal, liver, and colorectal cancers. These sex disparities are partly explained by the availability of estrogens and other genetic factors regulating inflammation, cell growth, and apoptosis. Sex differences in gut microbiota composition may contribute to differences in the incidence and phenotype of colorectal cancer. CCL2, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2; ER-β, estrogen receptor β; FFA, free fatty acid; HIF-1, hypoxia-inducible factor 1; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-8, interleukin 8; JAK2, janus kinase 2; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; p38MAPK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases; PRNCR1, lncRNA prostate cancer non-coding RNA; STAT3, signal transducers and activators of transcription 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Figure 2. Sex differences in the incidence of major gastrointestinal cancers associated with obesity. Men and women exhibit differences in body fat distribution and energy homeostasis regulation. Overall, visceral adipose tissue, more abundant in men than in women, is positively associated with the incidence of esophageal, liver, and colorectal cancers. These sex disparities are partly explained by the availability of estrogens and other genetic factors regulating inflammation, cell growth, and apoptosis. Sex differences in gut microbiota composition may contribute to differences in the incidence and phenotype of colorectal cancer. CCL2, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2; ER-β, estrogen receptor β; FFA, free fatty acid; HIF-1, hypoxia-inducible factor 1; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IL-6, interleukin 6; IL-8, interleukin 8; JAK2, janus kinase 2; MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; p38MAPK, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases; PRNCR1, lncRNA prostate cancer non-coding RNA; STAT3, signal transducers and activators of transcription 3; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
Ijms 22 01253 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heo, J.-W.; Kim, S.-E.; Sung, M.-K. Sex Differences in the Incidence of Obesity-Related Gastrointestinal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031253

AMA Style

Heo J-W, Kim S-E, Sung M-K. Sex Differences in the Incidence of Obesity-Related Gastrointestinal Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(3):1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031253

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heo, Ji-Won, Sung-Eun Kim, and Mi-Kyung Sung. 2021. "Sex Differences in the Incidence of Obesity-Related Gastrointestinal Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 3: 1253. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031253

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop