Next Article in Journal
Temporal Control of Seed Development in Dicots: Molecular Bases, Ecological Impact and Possible Evolutionary Ramifications
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Loco-Regional Skin Toxicity Induced by an In Situ Forming Depot after a Single Subcutaneous Injection at Different Volumes and Flow Rates in Göttingen Minipigs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 17
10.3390/ijms22179249
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Architecture and Genome-Wide Adaptive Signatures Underlying Stem Lenticel Traits in Populus tomentosa

by
Peng Li
1,2,†,
Jiaxuan Zhou
1,2,†,
Dan Wang
1,2,
Lianzheng Li
1,2,
Liang Xiao
1,2,
Mingyang Quan
1,2,
Wenjie Lu
1,2,
Liangchen Yao
1,2,
Yuanyuan Fang
1,2,
Chenfei Lv
1,2,
Fangyuan Song
1,2,
Qingzhang Du
1,2 and
Deqiang Zhang
1,2,*
1
National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, No. 35, Qinghua East Road, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(17), 9249; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179249
Submission received: 9 July 2021 / Revised: 21 August 2021 / Accepted: 25 August 2021 / Published: 26 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The stem lenticel is a highly specialized tissue of woody plants that has evolved to balance stem water retention and gas exchange as an adaptation to local environments. In this study, we applied genome-wide association studies and selective sweeping analysis to characterize the genetic architecture and genome-wide adaptive signatures underlying stem lenticel traits among 303 unrelated accessions of P. tomentosa, which has significant phenotypic and genetic variations according to climate region across its natural distribution. In total, we detected 108 significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms, annotated to 88 candidate genes for lenticel, of which 9 causative genes showed significantly different selection signatures among climate regions. Furthermore, PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 showed significant association signals and abiotic stress response, so we overexpressed these two genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and found that the number of stem cells in all three overexpression lines was significantly reduced by PtoNAC083 overexpression but slightly increased by PtoMYB46 overexpression, suggesting that both genes are involved in cell division and expansion during lenticel formation. The findings of this study demonstrate the successful application of an integrated strategy for dissecting the genetic basis and landscape genetics of complex adaptive traits, which will facilitate the molecular design of tree ideotypes that may adapt to future climate and environmental changes.

1. Introduction

Many long-lived perennial trees show local adaptation responses to multiple abiotic or biotic factors across large geographic ranges, spanning widely variable spatial environments [1]. A series of stable adaptive phenotypes have formed during the long course of their evolution, including bud break, flowering, leaf morphology, and bark composition [2,3,4]. The divergence of selection pressures among local environments shapes stable local ecotypes with unique adaptive phenotypes, producing remarkable selection signatures in the genomes of present-day ecotypes [5]. For example, differences in winter temperatures among a range of latitudes has produced significant differences in the bud break of Populus trichocarpa and altered the frequency of its genomic variations [2,6]. A deeper understanding of the genetic basis of local adaptation in tree species and the determining factors will offer insights into tree genetic improvement and ecosystem management in natural populations [5,7].
Morphological adaptations, such as leaf shape and bark texture, are among the most tangible examples of tree adaptations [8,9]. The stem lenticel is a highly specialized tissue of woody plants that has evolved to balance stem water retention and gas exchange as an adaptation to local environments, and it shows broad environmental diversity among tree species. Most trees contain lenticels within their rough bark, making them difficult to observe in genera such as Ulmus and Quercus, whereas lenticels are clear and observable in species such as Prunus persica and Populus tomentosa. Anatomically, the lenticel is a type of filling tissue that can be produced annually; it arises from phellogen, which is continuous with the surrounding corky periderm, but more active (Figure S1) [10].
The fundamental role of lenticels is to support stem water evaporation and the exchange of gases such as carbon dioxide and oxygen, and to regulate light penetration into the stem [11,12]. Most stem moisture is lost through lenticel tissue, although it covers only 3% of the stem surface of species such as Betula pendula [13]. The loosely arranged lenticel tissue can also act as a channel for invasion by pests and diseases [14]; for example, Pityogenes chalcographus invades Picea abies, and Pseudomonas syringae invades Aesculus hippocastanum through the lenticel [15,16]. The structural features and biological functions of the lenticel and periderm have been well characterized in trees [17,18], but the genetic architecture and adaptive mechanisms remain poorly understood.
Similar to other tree quantitative traits produced by secondary growth, lenticels show wide phenotypic variation across ecotypes; therefore, advanced genetics approaches such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are suitable for examining the genetic basis of the complex traits of lenticels [2,5,19,20]. The genomic selection signatures underlying these adaptive traits can be identified using selective sweeps [21], which allow us to evaluate the role of local adaptation in shaping the genetic variation of entire species [22,23,24].
The genus Populus comprises 25–35 commercially and ecologically important species of deciduous woody plants native to large geographic areas of the Northern Hemisphere [25]. Lenticel morphology is relatively uniform among Populus species, but some species display rich phenotypic variation, including P. tomentosa, which typically shows diamond-shaped lenticels on its smooth bark but diverse stem lenticel sizes and numbers across its broad geographic distribution in China (Figure S2). This diversity leads to significant environmental adaptability and provides an opportunity for investigating the genetic basis of adaptive traits.
In the present study, we applied GWAS to examine the genetic basis (additive, dominant, and epistatic effects) of variation in lenticel morphology in a natural population of 303 unrelated P. tomentosa accessions. We also performed selective sweeps to examine the geographic distribution of causative variation underlying adaptive lenticel traits. We characterized the functions of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 from P. tomentosa by overexpressing them in A. thaliana. The approaches used in this study will improve our understanding of the genetic basis underlying adaptive traits for the molecular design of improved varieties in different climate and geographic regions.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Variation in the Lenticel Traits of the Natural P. tomentosa Population

To assess phenotypic variation in the natural population, we quantified lenticels in terms of single lenticel area (LA, cm2), lenticel number (LN), and ratio of the total lenticel area to the total area of a rectangle (RA). All three lenticel traits showed considerable phenotypic diversity in the natural population, with coefficients of variation of 26.2–39.6% (Table S1). For example, LN ranged from 5.25 to 25 within the sampling area, which demonstrates its potential for population genetics and improvement studies (Table S1). Lenticel traits also showed high clonal repeatability, with values ranging from 0.460 (LA: p = 4.86 × 10–40) to 0.549 (LN: p = 4.67 × 10–56) (Table S1). Correlation analysis of the three traits showed that LA and LN were positively correlated with RA (LA: r = 0.775, p = 2.81 × 10–55; LN: r = 0.481, p = 5.29 × 10–17), whereas LA and LN had a weak negative correlation (r = −0.149, p = 0.014). LA had a weak positive correlation with diameter at breast height (r = 0.151, p = 0.013; Table S2), which suggests that pleiotropic loci may control these correlated traits.
Next, we compared phenotypic variation in the three lenticel traits between subpopulation pairs from three corresponding climate regions, which we presume to have adapted to their different environments (Figure S2A). We detected significant differences in the lenticel phenotypes across the three subpopulations (Figure 1A–C and Tables S3 and S4). For example, the mean LA was higher in the Northeast (NE) than in the Northwest (NW) and South (S) subpopulations (Figure 1B,C and Table S4), whereas the highest LN value was observed in the S, followed by NE and NW, subpopulations (Table S3). Similarly, the S and NE climate zones tended to have higher RA values than that of the NW zone (Tables S3 and S4), which is consistent with differences in rainfall, mean annual temperature, and relative humidity among the three climate zones (Tables S4 and S5).

2.2. Additive and Dominant Effects of Natural Variants Underlying Lenticel Traits Determined by GWAS

We conducted GWAS under the condition of taking population structure and genetic kinship as covariates to reveal additive and dominant effects among 9,401,992 high-quality SNPs and three lenticel traits in 303 Populus tomentosa accessions. 112 significant associations (p < 5.318 × 10–8) were identified among 108 SNPs and three lenticel traits, and each SNP explained 5.3–17.9% of the phenotypic variation (Table S6). Next, we annotated 88 genes in the 5-kb regions upstream and downstream of 108 significant SNPs using the P. tomentosa reference genome (Table S6). GO analysis revealed that the 88 genes extensively participated in the second cell biogenesis and transcription regulation (Supplementary Table S7).
Considering the genetic effects of the association loci, 88 and 80 associations showed significant additive and dominant effects, respectively, and 58 exhibited both additive and dominant effects (Table S6). Five association loci annotated with 5 pleiotropic genes, including 2 unknown protein-coding genes (Table S6), shared different pleiotropic effects between LA and RA traits, indicating their critical roles in lenticel formation. Among these pleiotropic SNPs, they have either an additive or dominant effect for different lenticel traits (Table S6). For example, SNP Chr3_4043365 exhibited an additive effect for LA but additive and dominant effect for RA. We further identified that SNP Chr14_5078112 exhibited joint effects for LA and RA, different additive effects for LA (−0.16) and RA (0.05), and dominant effects for LA (−0.11) and RA (0.07). These findings suggest complex genetic effects of polygenic loci during the formation of lenticel variation.

2.3. Pairwise Epistatic Effects of Natural Variants Underlying Lenticel Traits

To decipher the potential gene networks involved in lenticel traits, we focused on pairwise epistatic interactions for each trait among the 108 associated loci. In total, 15 significant epistatic pairs were detected for the three lenticel traits at a threshold of p < 0.001 (Table S7), indicating that epistasis provides important information about the genetic interaction networks underlying lenticel trait variation. For example, we found that a major associated SNP, Chr3_4043365 (Figure 2A,B), which is located in the promoter region of Ptom.003G.00501 (PtoNAC083), significantly interacted with five unique SNPs for the three lenticel traits (Table S7). We also found that allele interactions of different genotype combinations were significantly different from those of a single locus. For example, SNP Chr3_4043365 (T/C) had significant epistatic interactions with SNP Chr9_3551378 (G/A), which belongs to Ptom.009G.00386 (PtoMYB46), for LA. The genotype combination of T (Chr3_4043365) and G (Chr9_3551378) showed the minimum LA, whereas that of C (Chr3_4043365) and A (Chr9_3551378) showed the maximum LA (Figure 2C).

2.4. Differences in Allele Frequency of Associated Genes among P. tomentosa Subpopulations

Based on the significant phenotypic differences across the three subpopulations from different climatic regions (Figure 1), we computationally examined genomic signatures that appeared to be affected by adaptive selection of local environment by using a 5 kb non-overlapping sliding window across the whole genome among NE, NW, and S climatic regions. Combining the adaptive selection signatures and GWAS signal results, we identified 9 representative genes, which harbored SNPs that were significantly associated with lenticel traits, and the gene regions overlapped the genomic regions of adaptive selection among the climate regions of P. tomentosa (Table 1 and Figure 3A–C). These 9 genes were significantly associated with the lenticel traits and were significantly selected by the local environment, suggesting that these genes have important effects on the lenticel and thus the adaptation of local environment.
Genes associated with LA exhibited a significant difference in frequency between the NE subpopulation and the NW or S subpopulation (Figure 3D). For example, TREHALASE 1 (Ptom.003G.00730), which had a significant SNP (G/T) for LA (p = 1.288 × 10–8), showed obvious differences among the subpopulations, in that the mutant allele (T) was dominant in the NE subpopulation but was missing from the NW and S subpopulations (Figure 3D–E). We also discovered four associated SNPs for the LN trait with significant differences in allele frequency among the three climate regions (Figure 3F). For example, a synonymous variant, SNP Chr10_7228249 (A/T) in intron of Ptom.010G.01098, encoding Cytochrome P450 superfamily protein, showed obvious differences among the subpopulations, whereas the mutant allele (T) was decreased in frequency in the low-latitude S subpopulation compared with the NE and NW subpopulations. Similar differences were observed in Chr17_4717361, Chr2_18582313, and Chr6_6559040, which are presumably mutant alleles with higher frequencies in northern China (Figure 3F; Table 1).
The specific environment of each climate region is likely to shape phenotypic variation by influencing the genotype frequency of causative genes. Indeed, the allele frequency patterns of the associated loci were consistent with lenticel phenotypic differentiation among subpopulations (Figure 3D–G). For example, this phenomenon was observed for the most likely causal gene, Ptom.017G.00466 (KTN1; KATANIN 1), which influences multidimensional cell growth and plant cell wall biogenesis in A. thaliana [26]. A SNP (Chr17_4717361; A/G) within KTN1 was strongly associated with LN (p = 7.5907 × 10–9) and was located in the selective signal peak with strong π and FST outliers (Figure 3B,C). Thus, SNP Chr17_4717361 showed obvious frequency differences among the subpopulations and corresponding region-specific additive effects, in which accessions in the NW subpopulation with the mutant homozygous allele (G) had a smaller LN compared with those with the major homozygous allele (A), which was distributed mainly in the S subpopulation, and accessions in the NE subpopulation with heterozygous genotypes (A/G) had intermediate phenotype values (Figure 3E).

2.5. Allelic Interpretation of the Potential Causal Genes Underlying Lenticel Variation

Our GWAS revealed the most significant variants involved in lenticel variation, including the top SNPs (with the most significant p values) or high-LD haplotypes of multiple top-ranked associated SNPs underlying lenticel traits in Populus, which may represent causative signals for each trait (Table 2). For example, we detected a non-coding SNP (Chr7_10376607, A/C) within the fifth intron of PtoTraB2 (Ptom.007G.00998), which was strongly associated with LN (p = 1.15 × 10–10) and is likely to be a causative gene within the associated signal (Figure 4A–C). Accordingly, TraB1 (Ptom.007G.00997), another member of the TraB family in P. tomentosa, was found to be located 634 bp up.
Stream of TraB2. We compared the expression patterns of both genes across various tissues of the P. tomentosa clone (Figure 4D). Both members showed different tissue-specific expression patterns; PtoTraB2 was highly expressed in bark and PtoTraB1 in mature xylem (Figure 4D). qRT-PCR showed significantly higher PtoTraB2 expression in more lenticel numbers than in the general P. tomentosa population, revealing a function of PtoTraB2 in regulating LN in P. tomentosa (Figure 4E). Next, we further analyzed PtoTraB2 as a potential variant underlying LN. A portion of the 11,560-bp genomic region, spanning from the promoter to the 3′-untranslation regions (UTR) of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2, was subjected to candidate gene-based association fine mapping. A newly identified InDel (Chr7_10376577, CTTATTTCT/C) had the most significant association with the LN (p = 1.67 × 10–8), which was in high LD with the SNP Chr7_10376607 (r2 = 0.96), identified in GWAS (Figure 4F–H). The double minor haplotype homozygous (C-C) accessions had greater LN values and higher gene expression levels of PtoTraB2 than those of the double WT haplotype homozygous (CTTATTCT-A) accessions. The common haplotype heterozygote (CTTATTCT/C-A/C) had moderate LN values compared with the double homozygote groups, which revealed an additive effect of the haplotype on lenticel variation (Figure 4E).

2.6. A NAC-Type Transcription Factor (PtoNAC83) Is an Important Genetic Regulator Contributing to Lenticel Variation

To identify the possible causative variants within the representative PtoNAC083 locus for lenticel variation, the association analysis was carried out with the Populus tomentosa population of 303 10-year-old accessions that were planted in a common garden in Guan Xian County, Shandong Province, China. In total, 46 InDels and 54 SNPs located in the promoter and coding region of PtoNAC083, respectively, and two lenticel traits (LA and RA) were examined statistically. Four significant associations were detected in two traits, representing a known SNP (Chr3_4043365) and a new InDel (Chr3_4043376) in PtoNAC083 (Figure 2C,D). The InDel Chr3_4043376, AGG/A, located in the promoter region of PtoNAC083, was the lead variant for LA (p = 4.06 × 10–8) and RA (p = 5.16 × 10–8). qRT-PCR showed significantly higher PtoNAC83 expression in accessions with common genotype (AGG) than in the accessions with minor genotype (A), revealing that a causal variants InDel Chr3_4043376 is most likely a causal, or is in high LD with the causal variants responsible for the natural of LA, as well as PtoNAC083expression (Figure 2C,D,F). In addition, SNP Chr3_4043365 had significant epistatic interactions with SNP Chr9_3551378 (G/A), which belongs to PtoMYB46, for LA (Figure 2E; Table S7). These two genes also showed opposite expression patterns in lenticels with different alleles (Figure 2F), which indicates that PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 play opposite roles in lenticel phenotypic variation. Annual rainfall and temperature are the main environment factors among three climate regions [10,27]. We further compared the expression abundance of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 under drought and normal conditions in a population constituted with 100 accessions of P. tomentosa [28]. The expression of PtoNAC083 in drought environment is higher than that in normal environment, and the expression of PtoMYB46 in drought environment is lower than that in normal environment (Figure S3). NW is located in arid and semiarid areas, which experience little precipitation and a wider annual temperature range than the NE. These results indicate that PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 show consistent expression patterns in natural population (constituted with 303 accessions) and drought stress population (constituted with 100 accessions).
Finally, we heterologously overexpressed PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 in A. thaliana and measured cell traits in three independent homozygous transformed lines (Figure 5). Although A. thaliana cannot produce lenticels, this species is associated with the proliferation and differentiation of phellogen (Figure S1); therefore, we used cell number and size to evaluate the roles of the key genes. Stems of the PtoNAC083-overexpressing plants were markedly thinner (56.16–78.23%), whereas those of PtoMYB46-overexpressing plants were thicker (119.40–155.71%) than those of WT plants (Figure 5A). We further examined cell morphology and numbers and found decreases of 26.60% and 38.22%, respectively, in PtoNAC083-overexpressing plants, which suggests that these plants developed thinner stems with fewer and smaller cells. In PtoMYB46-overexpressing plants, the cell number and size were increased by 9.04% and 29.67% (Figure 5C–E), respectively, which suggests that PtoNAC083 restricts LA and RA by limiting cell number and area, and that PtoMYB46 promotes lenticel production by increasing cell number and area, although this result was not significant. In addition, there is no significant difference in stomatal morphological (stomatal length, stomatal width, and area) and net photosynthetic rate of overexpressing plants (Figure 5F–G,I). However, the PtoNAC083-overexpressing and PtoMYB46-overexpressing plants showed slower transpiration rate and higher water use efficiency than WT plants (Figure 5J,K).

3. Discussion

Forest trees have evolved long-term adaptive traits to adapt to land ecosystems. Lenticel tissue is characterized by small pores on stem surfaces that are composed of filling tissue and phellogen; these pores provide channels for the direct exchange of gases between internal tissues and the atmosphere [29,30]. Using GWAS and selective sweep analysis, we detected the genetic architecture and adaptive selection signals of lenticel morphology and identified the causative loci underlying its intra- and interpopulation variations in natural populations of P. tomentosa. The results of this study improve our understanding of the genetic basis and genomic differentiation of complex plant traits that are difficult to quantify using traditional research methods.

3.1. GWAS Permits Comprehensive Understanding of the Genetic Basis of Lenticel in Populus

GWAS is a powerful tool that can be applied to determine the causal genes controlling quantitative trait variation in trees by combining phenotype and genotype data in population genetics studies [31,32]. In the present study, we detected 108 SNPs representing 88 genes associated with three lenticel traits (Table S6), representing a largely polygenic genetic basis for lenticel in a natural population of P. tomentosa. Functional annotation of these genes showed that they belong to different functional categories, including regulation of cell growth, cell wall biogenesis, and stimulus response (Table S6). Similar results were obtained in a genetic study of the secondary growth processes of woody plants [33], suggesting that lenticel formation and development are controlled by multiple factors affecting cell division and expansion, in a process similar to wood formation [34]. Among these genes, three were previously reported to participate in bark formation in other poplar species [8,35,36]. Considering that bark and lenticel develop from phellogen, these three genes may reflect aspects of the commonalities between the two tissues. For example, we identified an association of Ptom.016G.00430, a homolog gene encoding a NIT4 enzyme (AT5G22300), with LA (Table S6). Previous studies have demonstrated that NIT4 plays a key role in cyanide detoxification during ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis [37]. Additional evidence has shown that Ptom.016G.00430 is associated with bark texture and may be related to the characteristics of bark and lenticel, which are both composed of dead differentiated cells and are produced in annual strata [8,10].
We further categorized the genetic basis underlying lenticel variation into the additive and dominant contributions of alleles to provide a theoretical foundation for the construction of genetic control networks for complex traits. Pleiotropic loci have diverse additive/dominant effects for different lenticel traits. For example, Chr3_4043365, a pleiotropic locus for LA and RA, showed negative additive/dominant effects (−0.16/−0.11) for LA but a positive additive/dominant effect for RA (0.05/0.07) (Table S6). Thus, these loci affect lenticel traits via a combination of additive and non-additive alleles, providing a foundation for genetic improvements in P. tomentosa, such as landscape tree species with smooth and attractive bark via molecular design.
Epistatic interactions generally define the non-additive interactions between two associated loci [38]. Our epistasis analysis identified 15 significant epistatic pairwise interactions among three lenticel traits, including eight loci with additive/dominant effects (Table S7), which indicates that epistasis could provide important information about the interactive genetic networks underlying lenticel. For example, a top SNP, located in the promoter region of PtoNAC083, had significant epistatic interactions with Chr9_3551378, which is found in PtoMYB46. PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 also showed opposite tissue-specific expression patterns, indicating a potential interaction between the two genes, which is consistent with prior studies of A. thaliana reporting that the homologous NAC083 (VND-INTERACTING2, VNI2) inhibits transcriptional activation of MYB46 in the regulatory network of xylem vessel formation [39]. Epistasis is important for further exploration of the mechanisms of plant responses to environment selection [40]. Interestingly, Chr3_4043365, a likely causal locus for lenticel variation, showed significant epistatic interactions with two SNPs that are close to selective sweep signals, suggesting that lenticel phenotypic variation responds to adaptive selection mainly via gene regulation by a hub gene rather than direct effects [41,42]; these findings may improve our understanding of the roles of epistasis in environmental adaptation in tree species [5,22]. The four components of the epistatic effect (additive × additive, additive × dominant, dominant × additive, and dominant × dominant) are related to allele frequency [43], and the allele distributions of these two adaptability-related loci showed significant differentiation among subpopulations (Figure 3E). These results may indicate different epistatic patterns in individual forest trees to adapt to the local environment. Therefore, further epistasis studies on different subpopulations may expand our understanding of the ability of forest trees to adapt to local ecosystems.

3.2. Local Adaptation of Candidate Genes with Overlapping Selection Signals and Their Associated Loci

The lenticel is a morphological adaptive trait of forest trees, with geographically structured phenotypic variation that is significantly affected by both biotic and abiotic stresses [5,16,44]. In this study, we used natural populations of P. tomentosa spanning wide climate gradients with significant spatial and geographic structures [22,45]; this system offers an ideal opportunity to examine the environmental forces shaping lenticel phenotypic variation. We observed lenticel traits that underwent selection pressure responsible for local adaptation among different climate regions of P. tomentosa (Figure 1 and Figure S1). The S climate region has a low latitude and subtropical monsoon climate, in which accessions receive abundant water and heat but frequently experience flooding and high-temperature stress [45]. Local accessions typically exhibit a smaller LA and greater LN and RA, which may allow rapid gas exchange to meet growth demands and resist flooding and disease stresses [15,46,47]. In contrast, the NW subpopulation is located in arid and semiarid areas which experience little precipitation and a wide annual temperature range. Accessions in this area with low LA, LN, and RA values can prevent water loss during drought [11]. Thus, lenticel formation may be affected by environmental conditions, leading to local variations in characteristics such as stem growth [22,48]. Even though association genetics methods provide estimates of the genetic architecture of complex traits, they cannot inform the relationships between individual genomic regions and adaptive traits. Selective sweep is a powerful tool that can be used to identify genomic regions related to local adaptation signals in trees, which would provide further information about the mechanisms by which subpopulations adapt to their local environments [48].
In this study, we identified 9 genes with overlapping GWAS and selective sweep signals (Table 1 and Figure 3), suggesting that these causal genes underlying lenticel formation are selected by the local environment. The functional categories of these genes contain multiple annotations related to cell signal transduction, cell growth, and stress response (Table S6). Among these genes is Ptom.010G.01894, and its homologous gene, AT3G25400, affects sugar transport and/or interconversion of applied sugars in Arabidopsis [49]. The homologous gene of Ptom.006G.00836 in Arabidopsis is AT3G53900, which affects growth by regulating pyrimidine catabolism [50]. The homologous gene of Ptom.003G.00730 is AT4G24040 (TRE1), which is involved in trehalose catabolism and plays an important role in the plant responses to cold and salinity stresses [51]. Based on our functional categorization, these 10 genes may involve lenticel adaptation to the environment in two ways. First, compared with the surface of bark, which is covered with waxy cutin and suberin, that of the lenticel consists only of cell wall outgrowth, which is insufficient for protection against diverse environmental pressures [10,52]. Therefore, lenticel cells have evolved different adaptive mechanisms to enhance their adaptability to the local environment; for example, some genes may affect trehalose biosynthesis to enhance cell adaptation in cold and high-salinity environments [51]. Second, poplars adapt to the local environment via genetic regulation of the number and/or morphology of lenticel cells to achieve gas exchange in the stems [29].
We further investigated population differences in the allele frequency and geographic distribution of gene loci with major effects among candidate genes, with overlapping GWAS and selective sweep signals (Figure 3D–G). The mutant allele of the significant SNPs associated with LN was distributed mainly in the NW region, followed by the NE region, and the mutant allele of the SNPs associated with LA was distributed mainly in the NW region, followed by the NE or S region (Figure 3D). These findings provide direct molecular evidence of the mechanism underlying the local adaptation of lenticel traits. For example, the mutant allele associated with Chr10_7228249 (A/T), a SNP associated with LN, was increased in frequency in the S subpopulation compared with the NE and NW subpopulations, perhaps due to the significantly colder and drier environment. The regional differentiation patterns of these loci/genes are partly consistent with the geographic distribution of lenticel traits (Figure S1 and Figure 3; Table S3), which suggests that the geographic environment had an extensive impact on lenticel performance during the adaptive evolution of P. tomentosa. Thus, the geographic distribution of favorable alleles sheds light on the potential for tree improvement in future breeding programs.

3.3. PtoNAC083 Is a Causal Gene Underlying Lenticel Formation in P. tomentosa

Unlike the adaptation-related genes with overlapping GWAS and selective sweep signals, we identified potential causative signals underlying Populus lenticel traits using a single GWAS. These genes may be involved in multiple biological processes, from secondary cell wall biogenesis and stress response to growth regulation and environmental adaptation (Table S6). We further examined locus PtoNAC083 as a representative example and found that in the promoter region of PtoNAC083, the top-ranked variant SNP Chr3_4043365 (T/C) was simultaneously associated with LA and RA (Figure 2A; Table S6), which is consistent with the higher expression of PtoNAC08 in bark (Table S8).
NAC proteins possess a conserved NAC domain that participates in various secondary growth and stress resistance processes in Populus [17,53,54,55]. NAC083 modifies cambial growth and cell differentiation by signaling and transcriptional reprogramming via ethylene [56]. PtoNAC083 is homologous to VNI2, a key transcriptional repressor of xylem vessel development in A. thaliana. VNI2 overexpression represses the normal differentiation of xylem vessels [39], which is useful for exploring novel functions of NAC in secondary growth. Our findings revealed that locus PtoMYB46 significantly interacted with PtoNAC083 to affect LA, which is consistent with the opposite tissue-specific expression patterns of the genes in P. tomentosa (Figure 2F; Table S8). These epistatic findings are supported by reports that VNI2 represses MYB46 expression during xylem vessel formation in A. thaliana [39,57]. PtoNAC083 and VNI2 share a typically conserved N-terminal DNA domain and 59% sequence similarity at the full protein level. To further explore the function of PtoNAC083, we generated transgenic A. thaliana overexpressing PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46. Histochemical staining of stem cross-sections of the transgenic PtoNAC083 lines showed decreased cell number and sizes, suggesting that PtoNAC083 may influence lenticel variation by cell number and sizes. Consistently, overexpression of PtoMYB46 resulted in increased, albeit not significantly, cell number and size (Figure 5E–G). Overexpression of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 showed opposite phenotypes, which supports the significant epistatic interaction between SNPs Chr3_4043365 and Chr9_3551378; in turn, the combination of these two loci has significant phenotypic effects. Thus, the phenotype of an individual depends on the specific combination of alleles at two loci, which may inform the functional interaction between these two genes [38]. However, the present study explored the relationship between these genes only at the expression level, without further examination of the molecular biological functions of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 in poplar. The epistatic genetic effects of Chr3_4043365 and Chr9_3551378 and the opposite phenotypes induced by PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 overexpression further demonstrate the important role of PtoNAC083 in lenticel formation, as well as the importance of epistasis analysis for systematic genetic analysis of quantitative traits. Because stem lenticels are produced during secondary phellogen growth, which is a multi-year accumulative process in P. tomentosa, it is difficult to verify the key genes involved in lenticel formation via gene transfer. In this study, we selectively verified the functions of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 in Arabidopsis using a gene transfer approach, but the direct function of NAC083 in P. tomentosa requires further investigation. Lenticel formation usually begins beneath stomatal complexes during primary growth preceding the development of the first periderm [10], but there are no significant differences in the stomatal morphology of PtoNAC083-overexpressing and PtoMYB46-overexpressing plants compared with WT (Figure 5F,G), which may be related to the formation of lenticels in the secondary growth process [10]. In addition, PtoNAC083-overexpressing and PtoMYB46-overexpressing plants showed slower transpiration rate and higher water use efficiency than WT plants (Figure 5J,K), which may indicate that these two genes may be involved in stress response. Previous studies of homologs of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 have shown that they play an important role in plant response to stress. For example, ANAC083 in Arabidopsis is induced by salt stress [58]; ZxNAC083 in Zygophyllum xanthoxylum conferred tolerance to salt and drought stress when constitutively overexpressed in Arabidopsis plants [59]; MdMYB46 in apple could coordinate stress signal transduction pathways to cooperate with the formation of secondary walls to enhance the stress tolerance [60]. Considering that the lenticel traits that underwent selection pressure responsible for local adaptation among different climate regions of P. tomentosa (Figure 1 and Figure S1), PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46, responded to stress, may provide further support for these two genes involved in lenticel traits.
In summary, this study is the first to identify the genetic architecture and adaptive mechanisms of lenticel variation. The integration of multiple strategies, including GWAS (additive, dominant, and epistatic effects), selective sweep, gene expression profiling, and Arabidopsis overexpression allowed us to identify candidate genetic factors underlying lenticel morphology and may also provide insights into the development of similar quantitative traits in perennial trees [22]. In this field, the joint application of a high-throughput phenome platform and multi-omics data may enable further exploration of the genetic basis of complex quantitative traits at the phenotype and biological system levels. Further studies of the interactions between trees and microbial communities in the lenticel may provide important information about tree adaptation to the local environment.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Association Population and Phenotyping

The association population used in this study consisted of 303 10-year-old accessions that were planted in a common garden in Guan Xian County, Shandong Province, China (36°23′ N, 115°47′ E). In 2009, the association population was asexually propagated via root segments and planted in a randomized complete block design with three replications (blocks). The association population was randomly selected from a collection of 1047 natural P. tomentosa accessions [61], representing almost the entire species range (30–40° N, 105–125° E), which has been previously divided into southern (S, n = 102), northwestern (NW, n = 93), and northeastern (NE, n = 108) climate regions of China [45].
A digital camera (Canon EOS 800D) was used to capture images of lenticels at a tree height of 1.35 m for 303 accessions in July 2019. To control environmental effects, phenotypes of all 303 accessions (each accession contains three replications) were measured from the directions (south, west, north, and east), and the mean value of 12 data (3 replicates × 4 directions) represented the final phenotypes of each accession. A rectangle with a horizontal width of 5 cm and vertical length of 10 cm was used as the standard sampling area (only lenticels within the range are counted). Images were analyzed to estimate the single lenticel area (LA, cm2), lenticel number (LN), and ratio of the total LA to the total area of a rectangle (RA) within the sampling area (5 × 10 cm) using ImageJ software [62]. We also measured the tree diameter at breast height (cm). Clonal repeatability was estimated using the rptR package ver. 0.9.22 in R ver. 3.5.3 software. Descriptive analysis, multiple comparisons, and correlation analysis of the phenotype data were conducted using one-way analysis of variance, followed by the least significant difference and Pearson correlation tests, using SPSS ver. 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

4.2. Resequencing and Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Calling

Preparation of the data used in this study has been described previously [63]. First, total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of 303 unrelated accessions using the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) and was used to construct resequencing libraries according to the manufacturer’s sample preparation instructions (Illumina, Tianjing, China). Then, we re-sequenced 303 genotypes at a depth of > 15× (raw data) using the Illumina GA II platform, following the manufacturer’s recommendations, to generate raw reads (100-bp or 150-bp paired-end reads). For quality control, we removed raw reads shorter than the length threshold (≤ 50% of nucleotides with a quality score < Q20). Short reads were then aligned to the P. tomentosa genome using the BWA-MEM algorithm in the BWA software package [64]. SNP calling was performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit ver. 4.0 and the SAMTOOLS ver. 1.3.1 software [65,66] In this process, low-quality SNPs with a QualByDepth < 2.0, Fisher Strand > 60.0, StrandOddsRatio > 3.0, quality < 20, depth of coverage < 8, and RMSMappingQuality < 40.0 were filtered out. Insertion/deletion (InDel) calling was performed using a QualByDepth < 2.0, quality < 20, Fisher Strand > 200.0, StrandOddsRatio > 10.0.

4.3. Population Genetics Analysis

We filtered the common SNPs using two criteria: minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05 and r2 (measure of linkage disequilibrium [LD]) < 0.2. The resulting 410,171 SNPs were used for kinship and population estimates. Varying levels of K (1–13) in our association population were calculated using the Bayesian clustering program fastStructure, and an optimal K value of 3 was selected using the chooseK.py script. Therefore, we used the K = 3 cluster result for the Q matrix as a covariant in our GWAS. We calculated genome-wide LD across the P. tomentosa genome using all SNPs with a MAF > 0.05 using the command “plink—vcf vcf_file—allow-no-sex—maf 0.05—r2—ld-window 5000—ld-window-r2 0.2—out out_file” in the PLINK software [67].

4.4. GWAS Test and Candidate Gene Association Analyses

We performed mixed linear model association analysis of three lenticel traits using the set of SNPs remaining after the removal of low-frequency SNPs (MAF < 5%) and LD-correlated SNPs (r2 > 0.7) in the TASSEL ver. 5.0 software [68]. We use PLINK to generate LD-correlated SNPs (r2 > 0.7) with the following parameters: indep-pairwise 50 5 0.7. The lenticel traits (LA, LN, and RA) used in GWAS were transformed by Z-score normalization. The population structure (Q) was evaluated using the STRUCTURE ver. 2.3.4 software [69], and pairwise kinship coefficients (K) were assessed using the SPAGeDi ver. 1.3 software [70]. The significance thresholds of the GWAS were determined using the modified Bonferroni correction [71], which suggested a threshold of p ≤ 5.318 × 10–8 (p = 0.5/n, where n = total SNPs used in association studies [9,401,992 SNPs]). Then, we defined 5-kb windows centered on each significant SNP. All gene models of P. tomentosa that overlapped a window were selected as candidate genes. When a window overlapped within more than one gene, we annotated the SNPs with multiple genes. LD was determined using the HAPLOVIEW ver. 4.2 software [72]. Manhattan plots were generated in R using the ‘qqman’ package [73].
We used candidate gene-based association analyses to detect possible causal variations underlying lenticel phenotypic variation. The mixed linear model in the TASSEL ver. 5.0 software [68] was used to test the statistical associations among all common allelic variations (including SNPs and InDels) and three lenticel-related traits, as described above.

4.5. Gene Ontology Enrichment Analysis

All genes uncovered by GWAS were annotated on the basis of the gene models of the P. tomentosa genome. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichments were determined by AgriGO (http://bioinfo.cau.edu.cn/agriGO/index.php (accessed on 15 August 2019)). Significant GO annotations for a list of genes were determined by FDR threshold p < 0.01.

4.6. Epistasis Analysis of Each SNP Pair

To detect epistatic effects of locus pairs on lenticel traits, we used the EPISNP ver. 2.0 module integrated with the epiSNP software package for Windows, based on the extended Kempthorne model [43]. Only SNPs showing significant association signals (p ≤ 5.318 × 10–8) according to GWAS were used for epistasis analysis. Interactions among different loci were orthogonally decomposed into four components: additive × additive, additive × dominant, dominant × additive, and dominant × dominant interactions.

4.7. RNA Extraction and RNA Sequencing

We collected apexes, leaves, bark, phloem, cambium, developing xylem, mature xylem, and roots from the 5-year-old P. tomentosa clone ‘741’, with three biological replicates. Total RNA was extracted from shoot apical meristem (peak), leaves, bark, phloem, cambium, developing xylem, mature xylem, and roots using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide lysis buffer and the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. High-quality RNA, determined using a nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen/Life Technologies, State of California, USA) were used for cDNA library construction according to the sample preparation instructions (Illumina). Paired-end sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (Illumina) following the user’s manual, and 150-bp paired-end reads were generated.

4.8. Screening for Selective Sweeps

To identify signatures of putative genomic regions under adaptation among three climate regions of P. tomentosa, nucleotide diversity (π) and genetic differentiation (FST) statistics were calculated using a sliding window approach (5-kb window) in the PLINK [67]. We scanned the ratios of genetic diversity between the NW and NE subpopulations (πNW/πNE), NW and S populations (πNW/πS), and NE and S populations (πNE/πS) to select windows with the top 5% ratios and the maximum absolute value of FST as candidate regions for further analysis. We performed the same subpopulation comparisons as described in Du et al. (2019) [22], because the S and NW climate regions are the central and marginal distribution regions, respectively, of P. tomentosa [25]. Finally, genes whose gene regions overlapped the genomic regions of adaptive selection found by GWAS were selected as candidate genes for further analysis.

4.9. Quantitative Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

Lenticel tissues were collected from P. tomentosa (accessions: 6510, 1701, 5016, 0001, 0057, 6338, 4411, 3717, and 3007) with different genotypes and were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Lenticel tissue was collected by scraping thin (∼0.5 mm) slices of the lenticel surface at a plant height of 1.35 m. 6510, 6338, and 4411 came from NW climate regions; 1701, 0001, and 0057 came from NE climate regions; 5016, 3717, and 3007 came from S climate regions. Total RNA was extracted from lenticel tissue with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide lysis buffer and the RNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The gene-specific primers were designed using the Primer Express ver. 5.0 software. We performed qRT-PCR using the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System with SYBR Premix Ex Taq, as described in Du et al. (2015) [61]. All reactions were performed in technical and biological triplicates with Populus Actin (EF145577) as the internal control, and the PCR program described in Zhang et al. (2011) [74].

4.10. PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 Vector Construction and Transformation in A. thaliana

Full-length cDNAs of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 from the 1-year-old P. tomentosa clone ‘LM50’ were amplified and inserted into the pCXSN vector under the control of the 35S promoter and introduced into Agrobacterium GV3101. Wild-type (WT) A. thaliana (Col-0) plants were transformed using the floral dipping method. Individuals of the T3 generation were obtained using hygromycin-based selection (30 mmol/L). The expression levels of PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46 in A. thaliana were measured in three independent homozygous transformed lines by qRT-PCR, and histological sections were used to verify the effects on the cells.

4.11. Paraffin Sectioning and Histological Analysis

Barks from the young stem of 1-year-old P. tomentosa clone ‘LM50’ were used for anatomical observation of lenticels. A. thaliana samples obtained from the stem at a height of 2 cm were used to verify the effects on the cells (1 cm high in stem). FAA (acetic acid; ethyl alcohol; formaldehyde) were used to fix tissue materials. For cell diameter of A. thaliana, twenty cells from each sample were measured and the data averaged. Hypocotyls of 13-day-old A. thaliana were stained with 10 μ/mL propidium iodide (PI) for 1 min and imaged using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, SP8, Allendale, NJ, USA).

4.12. Physiological Measurements

Net CO2 assimilation, transpiration rate, and instantaneous leaf water-use efficiency (WUE) (Pn/Tr) of 30-day-old plants were measured by the LI-6400 portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The measurements were taken on a fully expanded rosette leaf (six per line) at chamber temperature 23 °C and an ambient CO2 concentration of 360 µmol mol−1.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms22179249/s1.

Author Contributions

D.Z. designed the experiments; P.L., L.L., L.X., M.Q., W.L., L.Y., C.L. and F.S. collected and analyzed the data; J.Z., D.W. and Y.F. performed the experiments; P.L. and Q.D. wrote the manuscript; D.Z. obtained funding and is responsible for this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31872671 and 31872707), and the 111 Project (No. B20050).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data from genome re-sequencing of P. tomentosa have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) in BIG Data Center at Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences under the accession number of CRA000903. All data of GWAS and transcriptome are provided in Supplementary Tables.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Savolainen, O.; Lascoux, M.; Merilä, J. Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013, 14, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McKown, A.D.; Klápště, J.; Guy, R.; El-Kassaby, Y.; Mansfield, S. Ecological genomics of variation in bud-break phenology and mechanisms of response to climate warming in Populus trichocarpa. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 300–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Chamaillard, S.; Fichot, R.; Vincent-Barbaroux, C.; Bastien, C.; Depierreux, C.; Dreyer, E.; Villar, M.; Brignolas, F. Variations in bulk leaf carbon isotope discrimination.; growth and related leaf traits among three Populus nigra L. populations. Tree Physiol. 2011, 31, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Eckert, A.J.; Bower, A.D.; Wegrzyn, J.L.; Pande, B.; Jermstad, K.D.; Krutovsky, K.V.; St Clair, J.B.; Neale, D.B. Association genetics of coastal Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii. Pinaceae). I. Cold-hardiness related traits. Genetics 2009, 182, 1289–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Evans, L.M.; Slavov, G.T.; Rodgers-Melnick, E.; Martin, J.; Ranjan, P.; Muchero, W.; Brunner, A.M.; Schackwitz, W.; Gunter, L.; Chen, J.G.; et al. Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nature Genet. 2014, 46, 1089–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. González-Martínez, S.; Krutovsky, K.; Neale, D.B. Forest-tree population genomics and adaptive evolution. New Phytol. 2006, 170, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Neale, D.B.; Kremer, A. Forest tree genomics: Growing resources and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bdeir, R.; Muchero, W.; Yordanov, Y.; Tuskan, G.A.; Busov, V.; Gailing, O. Genome-wide association studies of bark texture in Populus trichocarpa. Tree Genet. Genomes 2019, 15, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Drost, D.R.; Puranik, S.; Novaes, E.; Novaes, C.R.; Dervinis, C.; Gailing, O.; Kirst, M. Genetical genomics of Populus leaf shape variation. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Evert, R.F. Esau's Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure Function and Development; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 440–442. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lendzian, K. Survival strategies of plants during secondary growth: Barrier properties of phellems and lenticels towards water.; oxygen.; and carbon dioxide. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2535–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Manetas, Y.; Pfanz, H. Spatial heterogeneity of light penetration through periderm and lenticels and concomitant patchy acclimation of corticular photosynthesis. Trees 2005, 19, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schönherr, J.; Ziegler, H. Water permeability of Betula periderm. Planta 1980, 147, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nemesio-Gorriz, M.; McGuinness, B.; Grant, J.; Dowd, L.; Douglas, G.C. Lenticel infection in Fraxinus excelsior shoots in the context of ash dieback. iForest 2019, 12, 160–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Laue, B.; Steele, H.; Green, S. Survival, cold tolerance and seasonality of infection of European horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) by Pseudomonas syringae pv. aesculi. Plant Pathol. 2014, 63, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rosner, S.; Führer, E. The significance of lenticels for successful Pityogenes chalcographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) invasion of Norway spruce trees [Picea abies (Pinaceae)]. Trees 2002, 16, 497–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alonso-Serra, J.; Safronov, O.; Lim, K.J.; Fraser-Miller, S.J.; Blokhina, O.B.; Campilho, A.; Chong, S.L.; Fagerstedt, K.; Haavikko, R.; Helariutta, Y.; et al. Tissue-specific study across the stem reveals the chemistry and transcriptome dynamics of birch bark. New Phytol. 2019, 222, 1816–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Miguel, A.; Milhinhos, A.; Novák, O.; Jones, B.; Miguel, C.M. The SHORT-ROOT-like gene PtSHR2B is involved in Populus phellogen activity. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 1545–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Du, Q.; Lu, W.; Quan, M.; Xiao, L.; Song, F.; Li, P.; Zhou, D.; Xie, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, D. Genome-wide association studies to improve wood properties: Challenges and prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Porth, I.; Klapšte, J.; Skyba, O.; Hannemann, J.; McKown, A.D.; Guy, R.D.; DiFazio, S.P.; Muchero, W.; Ranjan, P.; Tuskan, G.A.; et al. Genome-wide association mapping for wood characteristics in Populus identifies an array of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms. New Phytol. 2013, 200, 710–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, G.; Wang, S.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Liao, Q.; Zhang, C.; Lin, T.; Qin, M.; Peng, M.; Yang, C.; et al. Rewiring of the Fruit Metabolome in Tomato Breeding. Cell 2018, 172, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Du, Q.; Yang, X.; Xie, J.; Quan, M.; Xiao, L.; Lu, W.; Tian, J.; Gong, C.; Chen, J.; Li, B.; et al. Time-specific and pleiotropic quantitative trait loci coordinately modulate stem growth in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 608–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Li, Y.H.; Li, D.; Jiao, Y.Q.; Schnable, J.C.; Li, Y.F.; Li, H.H.; Chen, H.Z.; Hong, H.L.; Zhang, T.; Liu, B.; et al. Identification of loci controlling adaptation in Chinese soya bean landraces via a combination of conventional and bioclimatic GWAS. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 18, 389–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Josephs, E.; Stinchcombe, J.; Wright, S. What can genome-wide association studies tell us about the evolutionary forces maintaining genetic variation for quantitative traits? New Phytol. 2017, 214, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Du, Q.; Wang, B.; Wei, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, B. Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Chinese White Poplar (Populus tomentosa) Revealed by SSR Markers. J. Hered. 2012, 103, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jackson, M.D.; Duran-Nebreda, S.; Kierzkowski, D.; Strauss, S.; Xu, H.; Landrein, B.; Bassel, G.W. Global topological order emerges through local mechanical control of cell divisions in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem. Cell Syst. 2019, 8, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hu, X.G.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.R.; Mao, J.F.; Li, Y. Predicting impacts of future climate change on the distribution of the widespread conifer Platycladus orientalis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, W.; Du, Q.; Xiao, L.; Lv, C.; Quan, M.Y.; Li, P.; Yao, L.C.; Song, F.Y.; Zhang, D. Multi-omics analysis provides insights into genetic architecture of flavonoid metabolites in Populus. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 168, 113612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pangala, S.; Gowing, D.; Hornibrook, E.; Gauci, V. Controls on methane emissions from Alnus glutinosa saplings. New Phytol. 2014, 201, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Groh, B.; Hübner, C.; Lendzian, K. Water and oxygen permeance of phellems isolated from trees: The role of waxes and lenticels. Planta 2002, 215, 794–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fahrenkrog, A.M.; Neves, L.G.; Resende, M.F.; Vazquez, A.I.; de Los Campos, G.; Dervinis, C.; Sykes, R.; Davis, M.; Davenport, R.; Barbazuk, W.B.; et al. Genome-wide association study reveals putative regulators of bioenergy traits in Populus deltoides. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, H.; Peng, Z.; Yang, X.; Wang, W.; Fu, J.; Wang, J.; Han, Y.; Chai, Y.; Guo, T.; Yang, N.; et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Müller, B.S.F.; Almeida, J.E.; Lima, B.M.; Garcia, C.C.; Missiaggia, A.; Aguiar, A.M.; Takahashi, E.; Kirst, M.; Gezan, S.A.; Silva-Junior, O.B. Independent and Joint-GWAS for growth traits in Eucalyptus by assembling genome-wide data for 3373 individuals across four breeding populations. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 818–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Plomion, C.; Leprovost, G.; Stokes, A. Wood Formation in Trees. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, J.; Wu, Q.; Zuo, T.; Guo, L.; Chang, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; He, W. Genome-wide transcriptomic profiles reveal multiple regulatory responses of poplar to Lonsdalea quercina infection. Trees 2016, 30, 1389–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Islam, N.; Li, G.; Garrett, W.M.; Lin, R.; Sriram, G.; Cooper, B.; Coleman, G.D. Proteomics of Nitrogen Remobilization in Poplar Bark. J. Proteome Res. 2014, 14, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Piotrowski, M.; Schönfelder, S.; Weiler, E. The Arabidopsis thaliana Isogene NIT4 and Its Orthologs in Tobacco Encode β-Cyano-l-alanine Hydratase/Nitrilase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 2616–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Phillips, P. Epistasis—The essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2008, 9, 855–867. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yamaguchi, M.; Ohtani, M.; Mitsuda, N.; Kubo, M.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Fukuda, H.; Demura, T. VND-INTERACTING2, a NAC Domain Transcription Factor.; Negatively Regulates Xylem Vessel Formation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1249–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Hansen, T. Why epistasis is important for selection and adaptation. Evolution 2013, 67, 3501–3511. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Mackay, T. Epistasis and quantitative traits: Using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. McKown, A.D.; Klápště, J.; Guy, R.D.; Geraldes, A.; Porth, I.; Hannemann, J.; Friedmann, M.; Muchero, W.; Tuskan, G.A.; Ehlting, J. Genome-wide association implicates numerous genes underlying ecological trait variation in natural populations of Populus trichocarpa. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 535–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, L.; Runesha, H.B.; Dvorkin, D.; Garbe, J.R.; Da, Y. Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Schaffer, B. Flooding responses and water-use efficiency of subtropical and tropical fruit trees in an environmentally-sensitive wetland. Ann. Bot. 1998, 81, 475–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Huang, Z. The study on the climatic regionalization of the distributional region of Populus tomentosa. J. Beijing For. Univ. 1992, 14, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Steppe, K.; Saveyn, A.; McGuire, M.A.; Lemeur, R.; Teskey, R.O. Resistance to radial CO2 diffusion contributes to between-tree variation in CO2 efflux of Populus deltoides stems. Funct. Plant Biol. 2007, 34, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cao, F.L.; Conner, W.H. Selection of flood-tolerant Populus deltoides clones for reforestation projects in China. For. Ecol. Manag. 1999, 117, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Collevatti, R.G.; Novaes, E.; Silva-Junior, O.B.; Vieira, L.D.; Lima-Ribeiro, M.S.; Grattapaglia, D.A. genome-wide scan shows evidence for local adaptation in a widespread keystone Neotropical forest tree. Heredity 2019, 123, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kunz, S.; Pesquet, E.; Kleczkowski, L.A. Functional dissection of sugar signals affecting gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cornelius, S.; Witz, S.; Rolletschek, H.; Möhlmann, T. Pyrimidine degradation influences germination seedling growth and production of Arabidopsis seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 5623–5632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. John, R.; Raja, V.; Ahmad, M.; Jan, N.; Majeed, U.; Ahmad, S.; Yaqoob, U.; Kaul, T. Trehalose: Metabolism and role in stress signaling in plants. In Stress Signaling in Plants: Genomics and Proteomics Perspective; Sarwat, M., Ahmad, A., Abdin, M.Z., Ibrahim, M.M., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Volume 3, pp. 261–275. [Google Scholar]
  52. Rains, M.; Gardiyehewa, D.; Silva, N.; Molina, I. Reconstructing the suberin pathway in poplar by chemical and transcriptomic analysis of bark tissues. Tree Physiol. 2018, 38, 340–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Johnsson, C.; Jin, X.; Xue, W.; Dubreuil, C.; Lezhneva, L.; Fischer, U. The plant hormone auxin directs timing of xylem development by inhibition of secondary cell wall deposition through repression of secondary wall NAC-domain transcription factors. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 165, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Lin, Y.J.; Chen, H.; Li, Q.; Li, W.; Wang, J.P.; Shi, R.; Tunlaya-Anukit, S.; Shuai, P.; Wang, Z.; Ma, H. Reciprocal cross-regulation of VND and SND multigene TF families for wood formation in Populus trichocarpa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E9722–E9729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Shuai, P.; Su, Y.; Liang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Xia, X.; Yin, W. Identification of phasiRNAs and their drought-responsiveness in Populus trichocarpa. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590, 3616–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Seyfferth, C.; Wessels, B.; Jokipii-Lukkari, S.; Sundberg, B.; Delhomme, N.; Felten, J.; Tuominen, H. Ethylene-Related Gene Expression Networks in Wood Formation. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Zhong, R.; Richardson, E.; Ye, Z. The MYB46 Transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19, 2776–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Seo, P.J.; Park, C.M. Signaling linkage between environmental stress resistance and leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1564–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Yin, H.; Li, M.; Li, D.; Khan, S.A.; Hepworth, S.R.; Wang, S.M. Transcriptome analysis reveals regulatory framework for salt and osmotic tolerance in a succulent xerophyte. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, K.; Song, M.; Guo, Y.; Liu, L.; Xue, H.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Z. MdMYB46 could enhance salt and osmotic stress tolerance in apple by directly activating stress-responsive signals. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2341–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Du, Q.; Tian, J.; Yang, X.; Pan, W.; Xu, B.; Li, B.; Ingvarsson, P.K.; Zhang, D. Identification of additive.; dominant.; and epistatic variation conferred by key genes in cellulose biosynthesis pathway in Populus tomentosa. DNA Res. 2015, 22, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Schindelin, J.; Rueden, C.; Hiner, M.; Eliceiri, K. The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2015, 82, 518–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Quan, M.; Du, Q.; Xiao, L.; Lu, W.; Wang, L.; Xie, J.; Song, Y.; Xu, B.; Zhang, D. Genetic architecture underlying the lignin biosynthesis pathway involves noncoding RNAs and transcription factors for growth and wood properties in Populus. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Li, H. Aligning sequence reads.; clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1303.3997. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mckenna, A.; Hanna, M.; Banks, E.; Sivachenko, A.; Cibulskis, K.; Kernytsky, A.; Garimella, G.; Altshuler, D.; Gabriel, S.; Daly, M.; et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20, 1297–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Li, H.; Handsaker, B.; Wysoker, A.; Fennell, T.; Ruan, J.; Homer, N.; Marth, G.; Abecasis, G.; Durbin, R.; 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2078–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.R.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; de Bakker, P.I.W.; Daly, M.J.; et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Bradbury, P.J.; Zhang, Z.; Kroon, D.E.; Casstevens, T.M.; Ramdoss, Y.; Buckler, E.S. TASSEL: Software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2633–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Hardy, O.; Vekemans, X. SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2002, 2, 618–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, M.; Yeung, J.; Cherny, S.; Sham, P. Evaluating the effective numbers of independent tests and significant p-value thresholds in commercial genotyping arrays and public imputation reference datasets. Hum. Genet. 2012, 131, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Barrett, J.; Fry, B.; Maller, J.; Daly, M. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 263–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Turner, S.D. qqman: An R package for visualizing GWAS results using QQ and manhattan plots. bioRxiv 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, D.; Xu, B.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Li, B. The sucrose synthase gene family in Populus: Structure, expression, and evolution. Tree Genet. Genomes 2011, 7, 443–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 22 09249 g001 550
Figure 1. Phenotypic variation in lenticel traits in a natural population of Populus tomentosa. (A) Map of climatic regionalization of the P. tomentosa population. Grey blocks indicate administrative divisions among provinces of China. Black lines indicate the three climate regions, based on Huang (1992). Northwest (NW), Northeast (NE), and South (S) represent the northwest, northeast, and southern climate regions, respectively. (B) Heatmap visualization of the association of three lenticel traits in the population. (C) Box plot of the three lenticel traits. (D) Lenticel phenotypic differences among three representative individuals (4701, 9010, and 0076) from the three climate regions. Rep1–3 represent three clones of the same genotype. Bars = 1 cm.
Figure 1. Phenotypic variation in lenticel traits in a natural population of Populus tomentosa. (A) Map of climatic regionalization of the P. tomentosa population. Grey blocks indicate administrative divisions among provinces of China. Black lines indicate the three climate regions, based on Huang (1992). Northwest (NW), Northeast (NE), and South (S) represent the northwest, northeast, and southern climate regions, respectively. (B) Heatmap visualization of the association of three lenticel traits in the population. (C) Box plot of the three lenticel traits. (D) Lenticel phenotypic differences among three representative individuals (4701, 9010, and 0076) from the three climate regions. Rep1–3 represent three clones of the same genotype. Bars = 1 cm.
Ijms 22 09249 g001
Ijms 22 09249 g002 550
Figure 2. PtoNAC83 is an important genetic regulator that contributes to lenticel area (LA) and the ratio of the total LA to the area of a standard rectangular sampling window (RA) in Populus tomentosa. (A) Manhattan plots of GWAS results for all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus LA and RA. The horizontal red line represents the significance threshold (−log10P > 7.27425). The arrow indicates the signal containing the candidate genes. (B) Box plot of SNP genotype effects of Chr3_4043365 on LA and RA. (C) Manhattan plots of candidate genes associated with genetic markers (SNPs and InDels) versus LA and RA. (D) Gene structure diagram and linkage disequilibrium (LD) heatmap (bottom) of PtoNAC83. Green, red, black, and gray represent non-coding, exon, intron, and intergenic regions, respectively. (E) Epistatic effects between Chr3_4043365 and Chr9_3551378 underlying LA. The C allele (Chr3_4043365) depends on the A allele (Chr9_3551378) in increasing LA. (F) Genotype effects of haplotype on PtoNAC83 and PtoMYB46 expression. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 12).
Figure 2. PtoNAC83 is an important genetic regulator that contributes to lenticel area (LA) and the ratio of the total LA to the area of a standard rectangular sampling window (RA) in Populus tomentosa. (A) Manhattan plots of GWAS results for all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) versus LA and RA. The horizontal red line represents the significance threshold (−log10P > 7.27425). The arrow indicates the signal containing the candidate genes. (B) Box plot of SNP genotype effects of Chr3_4043365 on LA and RA. (C) Manhattan plots of candidate genes associated with genetic markers (SNPs and InDels) versus LA and RA. (D) Gene structure diagram and linkage disequilibrium (LD) heatmap (bottom) of PtoNAC83. Green, red, black, and gray represent non-coding, exon, intron, and intergenic regions, respectively. (E) Epistatic effects between Chr3_4043365 and Chr9_3551378 underlying LA. The C allele (Chr3_4043365) depends on the A allele (Chr9_3551378) in increasing LA. (F) Genotype effects of haplotype on PtoNAC83 and PtoMYB46 expression. Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 12).
Ijms 22 09249 g002
Ijms 22 09249 g003 550
Figure 3. Population genetic differentiation for the 10 genes and GWAS loci with allele frequency differences across three subpopulations. (A) Manhattan plots of the lenticel number (LA) and lenticel number (LN). (B,C) Manhattan plots, nucleotide diversity (π), and genetic differentiation (FST) values within 200 kb of the SNP loci. Yellow and green lines represent the π ratio (π_region1/π_region2) and 10× FST values, respectively. The structures of 9 genes that harbor SNPs significantly associated with lenticel traits and overlap the genomic regions of adaptive selection. Red, black, and green rectangles indicate exon, intron, and 3′UTR/5′UTR sequences, respectively. (D–G) Allele frequencies of SNPs and phenotypic variation in lenticel traits in the three subpopulations. In the pie chart, orange and purple indicate the dominant and mutant alleles, respectively.
Figure 3. Population genetic differentiation for the 10 genes and GWAS loci with allele frequency differences across three subpopulations. (A) Manhattan plots of the lenticel number (LA) and lenticel number (LN). (B,C) Manhattan plots, nucleotide diversity (π), and genetic differentiation (FST) values within 200 kb of the SNP loci. Yellow and green lines represent the π ratio (π_region1/π_region2) and 10× FST values, respectively. The structures of 9 genes that harbor SNPs significantly associated with lenticel traits and overlap the genomic regions of adaptive selection. Red, black, and green rectangles indicate exon, intron, and 3′UTR/5′UTR sequences, respectively. (D–G) Allele frequencies of SNPs and phenotypic variation in lenticel traits in the three subpopulations. In the pie chart, orange and purple indicate the dominant and mutant alleles, respectively.
Ijms 22 09249 g003
Ijms 22 09249 g004 550
Figure 4. PtoTraB2 plays an important role in the genetic regulation of LN in Populus tomentosa. (A) Manhattan plots of LN. The arrow indicates the signal containing the candidate genes (Chr7_10378165). (B) Regional association plot of Chr7_10378165. (C) Box plot of genotype effects of SNP Chr7_10378165 for LN. (D) Expression patterns of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 in nine tissues of P. tomentosa. BA, bark; BL, mature leaves; BW, mature xylem; nBL, developing leaves; CA, cambium; nBW, developing xylem; PE, phloem; PHL, phloem; RO, root. (E) Effects of haplotype on LN and PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 expression, where “I” represents the wild-type (WT) locus (CTTATTTCT). (F) Gene structure of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2. Red, black, and green rectangles represent the exon, intron, and 3′UTR/5′UTR sequences. (G) Regional association plot of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2, including SNPs and InDels. (H) LD representation of pairwise r2 values among all polymorphic sites (SNPs and InDels) across the PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 locus, where darker red areas indicate higher r2 values.
Figure 4. PtoTraB2 plays an important role in the genetic regulation of LN in Populus tomentosa. (A) Manhattan plots of LN. The arrow indicates the signal containing the candidate genes (Chr7_10378165). (B) Regional association plot of Chr7_10378165. (C) Box plot of genotype effects of SNP Chr7_10378165 for LN. (D) Expression patterns of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 in nine tissues of P. tomentosa. BA, bark; BL, mature leaves; BW, mature xylem; nBL, developing leaves; CA, cambium; nBW, developing xylem; PE, phloem; PHL, phloem; RO, root. (E) Effects of haplotype on LN and PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 expression, where “I” represents the wild-type (WT) locus (CTTATTTCT). (F) Gene structure of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2. Red, black, and green rectangles represent the exon, intron, and 3′UTR/5′UTR sequences. (G) Regional association plot of PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2, including SNPs and InDels. (H) LD representation of pairwise r2 values among all polymorphic sites (SNPs and InDels) across the PtoTraB1 and PtoTraB2 locus, where darker red areas indicate higher r2 values.
Ijms 22 09249 g004
Ijms 22 09249 g005a 550Ijms 22 09249 g005b 550
Figure 5. Characterization of PtoNAC083, PtoMYB46, and WT plants. (A) Overall morphology and stem characterization of PtoNAC083-1, PtoMYB46-1, and WT plants. (B) Relative expression levels of WT, PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46. (C–E) Basal stem cross-sectional area, epidermal cell number, and epidermal cell area of PtoNAC083, PtoMYB46, and WT plants. (F–H) Statistics of stomatal in in the hypocotyls. Stomatal length (F), Stomatal length (G) and Stomatal area (H). (I–K) Net photosynthetic rate (I), transpiration rate (J), and instantaneous leaf water-use efficiency (WUE) (K). *, p < 0.05.
Figure 5. Characterization of PtoNAC083, PtoMYB46, and WT plants. (A) Overall morphology and stem characterization of PtoNAC083-1, PtoMYB46-1, and WT plants. (B) Relative expression levels of WT, PtoNAC083 and PtoMYB46. (C–E) Basal stem cross-sectional area, epidermal cell number, and epidermal cell area of PtoNAC083, PtoMYB46, and WT plants. (F–H) Statistics of stomatal in in the hypocotyls. Stomatal length (F), Stomatal length (G) and Stomatal area (H). (I–K) Net photosynthetic rate (I), transpiration rate (J), and instantaneous leaf water-use efficiency (WUE) (K). *, p < 0.05.
Ijms 22 09249 g005aIjms 22 09249 g005b
Table
Table 1. Full details of genes harboring significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and overlapping the genomic regions of adaptive selection.
Table 1. Full details of genes harboring significantly associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and overlapping the genomic regions of adaptive selection.
PhenotypeSNPAllelesSNP p-ValueGene_IdRegions of Selective Sweepπ_nw/π_sFstDescription
LAChr1_738204T/C5.76134 × 10−9Ptom.001G.00083Chr1: 725001–7450006.9583475760.40446225
Ptom.001G.00082Chr1: 725001–7450006.9583475760.40446225myb domain protein 5
LAChr3_5725284G/T1.28839 × 10−8Ptom.003G.00730Chr3: 5725001–57300002.8352962590.662955trehalase 1
LAChr10_13623192A/C1.49898 × 10−8Ptom.010G.01894Chr10: 13625001–136300002.5049757280.293226
LNChr2_18582313C/G4.69554 × 10−8Ptom.002G.02263Chr2: 18580001–186000003.5683149540.36376425NPL4-like protein 1
LNChr6_6559040A/T1.37452 × 10−8Ptom.006G.00835Chr6: 6535001–65400003.3042319930.384925Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) superfamily protein
Ptom.006G.00836Chr6: 6555001–65600003.3042319930.384925uracil phosphoribosyltransferase
LNChr10_7228249A/T2.67429 × 10−8Ptom.010G.01098Chr10: 7225001–72300003.5879918830.253253CytoChrome P450 superfamily protein
LNChr17_4717361A/G7.59074 × 10−9Ptom.017G.00466Chr17: 4670001–46850004.7932176490.485404P-loop containing nucleoside triphosphate hydrolases superfamily protein
π_region1/π_region2 refers to the ratio of π in different climate regions. ATG, Arabidopsis thaliana gene; LA, lenticel area; LN, lenticel number.
Table
Table 2. Major single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to candidate genes significantly associated with lenticel traits in Populus association mapping.
Table 2. Major single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to candidate genes significantly associated with lenticel traits in Populus association mapping.
TraitSNPAlleleLocationMarker_R2SNP p-ValuePopulus tomentosa GeneATG (Arabidopsis thaliana Gene)ATG Synonyms (Abbreviation) in Plants
LAChr3.4043365T/CPromoter0.109645.41161 × 10−10Ptom.003G.00501AT5G13180NAC domain containing protein 83
LAChr14.5078112C/TExon0.150343.76948 × 10−9Ptom.014G.00612AT3G61870
Ptom.014G.00614
LAChr2.16529660T/GDownstream0.075274.70312 × 10−9Ptom.002G.02153AT1G02730cellulose synthase-like D5
LAChr5.11035663A/TUpstream0.093492.17057 × 10−8Ptom.005G.01280AT5G67080mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 19
LNChr7.10376607A/CIntron0.094081.15327 × 10−10Ptom.007G.00997AT1G05270TraB family protein
Ptom.007G.00998AT1G05270TraB family protein
RAChr5.15162313G/ADownstream0.091932.47672 × 10−9Ptom.005G.01558
Ptom.005G.01557AT5G20240K-box region and MADS-box transcription factor family protein
RAChr3.4043365T/CDownstream0.146044.18145 × 10−9Ptom.003G.00501AT5G13180NAC domain containing protein 83
RAChr14.5078112C/TExon0.136492.54129 × 10−8Ptom.014G.00612AT3G61870
Ptom.014G.00614
RAChr5.11035663A/TUpstream0.097693.17383 × 10−8Ptom.005G.01280AT5G67080mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 19
RAChr2.16529613C/TDownstream0.167563.22066 × 10−8Ptom.002G.02153AT1G02730cellulose synthase-like D5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, P.; Zhou, J.; Wang, D.; Li, L.; Xiao, L.; Quan, M.; Lu, W.; Yao, L.; Fang, Y.; Lv, C.; et al. Genetic Architecture and Genome-Wide Adaptive Signatures Underlying Stem Lenticel Traits in Populus tomentosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179249

AMA Style

Li P, Zhou J, Wang D, Li L, Xiao L, Quan M, Lu W, Yao L, Fang Y, Lv C, et al. Genetic Architecture and Genome-Wide Adaptive Signatures Underlying Stem Lenticel Traits in Populus tomentosa. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(17):9249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179249

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Peng, Jiaxuan Zhou, Dan Wang, Lianzheng Li, Liang Xiao, Mingyang Quan, Wenjie Lu, Liangchen Yao, Yuanyuan Fang, Chenfei Lv, and et al. 2021. "Genetic Architecture and Genome-Wide Adaptive Signatures Underlying Stem Lenticel Traits in Populus tomentosa" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 17: 9249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179249

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop