Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Microwave Extraction and Separation of Volatile and Non-Volatile Organic Compounds of Boldo Leaves. From Lab to Industrial Scale
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Fiber Length on Carbon Nanotube-Induced Fibrogenesis
Previous Article in Journal
Generation of Bladder Urothelium from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells under Chemically Defined Serum- and Feeder-Free System
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Size on Ag Nanosphere Toxicity in Macrophage Cell Models and Lung Epithelial Cell Lines Is Dependent on Particle Dissolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms15057158
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available Tools

by
Suresh Panneerselvam
and
Sangdun Choi
*
Department of Molecular Science and Technology, Ajou University, Suwon 443-749, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(5), 7158-7182; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15057158
Submission received: 17 February 2014 / Revised: 28 March 2014 / Accepted: 9 April 2014 / Published: 25 April 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotoxicology and Lung Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nanotechnology has arisen as a key player in the field of nanomedicine. Although the use of engineered nanoparticles is rapidly increasing, safety assessment is also important for the beneficial use of new nanomaterials. Considering that the experimental assessment of new nanomaterials is costly and laborious, in silico approaches hold promise. Several major challenges in nanotechnology indicate a need for nanoinformatics. New database initiatives such as ISA-TAB-Nano, caNanoLab, and Nanomaterial Registry will help in data sharing and developing data standards, and, as the amount of nanomaterials data grows, will provide a way to develop methods and tools specific to the nanolevel. In this review, we describe emerging databases and tools that should aid in the progress of nanotechnology research.

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology enables the design and assembly of components with dimensions ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers (nm) [1]. The word nano, which is derived from the Greek word for dwarf, has been part of the scientific nomenclature since 1960 [2]. Macroparticles, which are particles with dimensions greater than 100 nm, have properties that are comparable to those of bulk materials; however, when particles are smaller than 100 nm, their behavior is influenced by atomic, molecular, and ionic interactions. Nanoparticles show novel and changeable properties due to quantum effects [3]. The material properties at the nanoscale level are unusual for two major reasons. First, nanomaterials have a considerably larger surface area than the equivalent mass of a material in a larger form. For instance, if we cut a one centimeter cube into 1021 cubes of one nm each, although the overall mass and volume remains the same, the surface area will increase by one million-fold [3]. Second, at the nanoscale level, quantum effects can begin to dominate the behavior of matter, thereby affecting the optical, electrical, and magnetic properties of materials. This behavior is the result of the actions of the electrons in the nanomaterials. Electrons possess two key characteristics [3]: rotation and a capacity to shift among particular energy levels. In iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles (≤20 nm in diameter), electrons rotate in the same direction, whereas in iron oxide macroparticles (>20 nm in diameter), electrons rotate in opposite directions. When electron spins are aligned in the same direction, the fields are additive, but as soon as the electrons begin to rotate in different directions, the fields eliminate each other. The total magnetic field strength of a nanomaterial is the sum of the magnetic fields of individual electrons. Consequently, nanoparticles comprise greater localized magnetic fields than larger particles [3].
In general, nanoparticles can be classified into three categories: organic, inorganic, and hybrid particles. Simple monomeric building blocks such as polymer-based nanoparticles are organic particles, whereas inorganic nanomaterials include carbon nanotubes, fullerene particles, and metallic nanoparticles (gold and silver nanoparticles). Hybrid nanoparticles comprise engineered nanoparticles such as DNA-carbon nanotube arrays [4]. Because the sizes of nanomaterials are comparable to the sizes of biomolecules such as proteins, they can be designed for biomedical applications such as devices for diagnosis, drug delivery, and therapy [5]. The sizes and shapes of some nanomaterials as compared to those of common materials are shown in Figure 1 [3,6]. Nanoparticles are found in many consumer products such as sheets and clothing (silver nanoparticles), cosmetics and sunscreens (titanium dioxide), bicycles (carbon nanoparticles), and even beer bottles (clay nanoparticles) [7]. Doxil and Abraxane, which are currently available on the market, are Food and Drug Administration-approved nanoformulations for cancer treatment [8]. Although the unique properties of nanomaterials hold promise for many applications, they also raise safety concerns. Nanoparticles can pose risks for human health because of their ability to penetrate into the human body, flow in the bloodstream, and pass through cells, which may cause undesirable side effects [9]. Therefore, knowledge of the biological and toxicological effects of nanomaterials is essential to determine whether the products are safe. However, assessing the safety of nanomaterials through experiments is costly and time consuming; hence, computational methods offer a profitable alternative [10]. Computational approaches can not only serve to build binding models of protein-nanoparticle complexes, but can also be used to simulate the binding processes [11].
Nanoinformatics is described as “the science and practice of determining which information is relevant to the nanoscale science and engineering community, and then developing and implementing effective mechanisms for collecting, validating, storing, sharing, analyzing, modeling and applying that information” [12]. The major setback of the discipline of nanoinformatics is that it is still at an early stage of development and the data are scattered in the form of publications [13–15]. Recently, some initiatives have emerged in the field of nanoinformatics with respect to nanoparticle data management [16–19]. The goal of this review is to describe the emerging databases and tools available for the nanotechnology community. We have categorized the nanoinformatics tools in this review based on relevant examples provided by Maojo et al. as well as on the availability of data [13].

2. Growth of Bioinformatics and Applications for Nanoinformatics

In the 1980s, it became mandatory to deposit all published DNA sequences in a central repository. At the same time, a standard was adopted by journals to make gene and protein sequences freely accessible to all and to compile all data in the form of openly available databases. The open accessibility of DNA sequences in databases such as GenBank [22] and the availability of protein structures in databases such as the Protein Data Bank [23] have motivated many researchers to develop powerful methods, tools, and resources for large-scale data analysis [24]. Simultaneously, growth in computational speed and memory storage capacity has led to a new era in the analysis of biological data. Bioinformatics has emerged as a powerful discipline and almost 1000 databases are currently publicly available [25] along with a large number of bioinformatics tools [26]. The growth and development of bioinformatics can provide valuable lessons for applying the same practice to benefit nanoinformatics development [27].

3. Databases

An overview of nanomaterial-related databases is provided in Table 1. The emergence of recent databases such as Investigation Study Assay (ISA) tab-delimited (TAB) format (ISA-TAB-Nano) [19], Cancer Nanotechnology Laboratory (caNanoLab) [17], and Nanomaterial Registry seems encouraging and is discussed below.

3.1. ISA-TAB-Nano

Motivated by an absence of standardization in representing and distributing nanomaterial data, the ISA-TAB-Nano was established for the public development of data sharing [19]. The ISA-TAB-Nano file format offers a common framework to record and integrate nanomaterial descriptions and uses the ISA-TAB open-source framework file format. ISA-TAB-Nano defines four file formats for the distribution of the data: (1) the Investigation file; (2) the Study file; (3) the Assay file; and (4) the Material file. The Investigation file provides reference data about each investigation, study, assay, and protocol. The Study file contains the names and attributes of procedures applied for preparing samples for examination (sources and characteristics of biospecimens). The Assay file contains the values of measured endpoint variables and references to external files for each analyzed sample. The Material file describes the material sample and its structural and chemical components. File format templates are available [36], which also provide information on using ontology terms to support standardized descriptions and assist searches for and incorporation of information. Ontology is a formal way of representing knowledge abstracted from the growing body of biological science in a coded form, which can be translated into a programming language [43,44]. A benefit of ontologies is to facilitate the description logic that can be utilized together for querying a dataset. Moreover, the data sets are analyzed which are not usually accessible to searching and comparing. Ontologies are used in databases in various ways. For example, ontologies are characterized in a computer-readable form that can be interpreted by computers as well as domain experts. Thomas et al. have provided a review of ontology terms used for standardized descriptions [45]. A list of ontology-related resources for nanotechnology is shown in Table 2.

3.2. caNanoLab

caNanoLab is a data repository that researchers can use for the submission and retrieval of information on nanoparticles, including their composition, function (e.g., therapeutic, targeting, diagnostic imaging), physical (e.g., size, molecular weight), and in vitro experimental characterizations (e.g., cytotoxicity, immunotoxicity) [17]. It also encourages data sharing and analysis across the cancer community to accelerate and authenticate the use of nanoparticles in biomedicine. To facilitate data submission, web-based forms are offered so that submitters can restrict the visibility of their records to be private, to be distributed to particular collaboration groups, or to be public. In addition, caNanoLab can be utilized for discovery purposes by using it to search publicly accessible physical and in vitro characterizations while providing access to the associated publications. Moreover, the query results are downloadable in spreadsheet-based formats. The caNanoLab project team is also currently engaged with ISA-TAB-Nano to facilitate the submission and exchange of data across the breadth of nanotechnology information. Future features of caNanoLab may include support for the validation, import, and export of ISA-TAB-Nano files by means of customized ISA-TAB tools. A summary of data available from caNanoLab is presented in Figure 2.

3.3. Nanomaterial Registry

For data to be useful to a wide community of researchers, the data must be easily available in a usable form. However, providing usable data is a task that becomes increasingly difficult as the quantity of information grows. Curation is particularly important for nanomaterials because the experimental conditions and process of sample preparation can affect the actual data measurement. Data curation is best achieved through increasing proficiency in assessing a specific feature of a specific dataset. To increase the efficiency of the information curation method, the Nanomaterial Registry developed a method to assist the combinatorial analysis of a variety of datasets [16]. The Nanomaterial Registry is a web-based database that offers curated data for characterized nanomaterials. The web-based curation tool has a dual functionality that maintains (a) manual data entry and (b) programmatic data upload. The curation tool resides in a protected environment that contains user accounts, roles, and permissions. User roles are supported by an administration tool that offers access, controls, and permissions for curators. As the curation technique improves and the dataset grows, these resources will become increasingly available to researchers and information analysts. Data available from the Nanomaterial Registry are shown in Figure 3.

4. Text Mining

Text mining is a computerized process for utilizing the enormous amount of knowledge existing in the literature [56,57]. Three important approaches to text mining are currently prevalent in the field of biology: (1) co-occurrence-based methods; (2) rule-based or knowledge-based approaches; and (3) statistical or machine learning-based approaches. Co-occurrence-based methods scan for specific terms or ideas that occur in the same sentence but are sometimes abstract, and then hypothesize an association between them. Rule-based systems make use of common knowledge about how language is structured, specific knowledge about how biologically significant information is stated in the literature, and the relationships that these two types of knowledge can have with one another. In contrast, statistical or machine learning-based systems function by building classifiers that may operate at any level. However, free full-text access for a large proportion of scientific journals is still unavailable. In several disciplines, such as chemistry, it is still hard to find enough abstracts for large-scale analysis [56,57]. Although the application of text mining to nanotechnology is at an early stage, some recent studies have been published [58–60]. The few available text-mining tools are as follows: (1) the Google Scholar search engine [61]; (2) the GoPubMed engine [62]; (3) Textpresso [63]; and (4) BioRAT [64]. When literature is available for analysis, it is possible to predict interactions via text mining, for example, using iHOP [65], which is an online service through which the names of genes and proteins in sentences from abstracts in PubMed can be hyperlinked and assembled into a conceptual network. Likewise, it might be possible to use text mining to predict nanoparticle-protein interactions for nanotechnology.

5. Molecular Modeling

The structures of nucleic acids and many proteins have been determined by crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance, electron microscopy, and many other techniques. Structural biology provides information on the static structures of biomolecules. However, in reality, biomolecules are highly dynamic, and their motion is important to their function. Different experimental techniques are available to help study the dynamics of biomolecules. Computational power continues to increase, and the development of new theoretical methods offers hope of solving scientific problems at the molecular level. All the theoretical methods and computational techniques that are used to model the behavior of molecules are defined as molecular modeling. Macromolecules can be studied only with molecular mechanics since other quantum methods based on the Schrodinger equations such as ab initio, semi-empirical, and density functional theory (DFT) methods require extensive computational time. Molecular mechanics uses classical physics and relies on force field. Ab initio and semi-empirical methods are based on approximate solutions of the Schrodinger equation. In addition, semi-empirical methods need additional empirical parameters (i.e., using parameterization) for the calculations. DFT methods are based on electron density. Novel molecules are best studied with ab initio or possibly DFT calculations, since the parameterization intrinsic to molecular mechanics or semi-empirical methods makes them unreliable for molecules that are different from those used in the parameterization. The energies of molecules such as proteins or DNA can be calculated using molecular mechanics; small molecule energies can be calculated using ab initio and semi-empirical methods [66,67]. There is an extensive body of three-dimensional structures of molecules essential to molecular modeling that can be visualized using software freely available for users for this purpose. A list of software for visualizing macromolecules is presented in Table 3.

5.1. Docking

Docking is an important computational tool in the drug discovery process and is used to specifically predict protein-ligand interactions. The two basic features of docking software are docking accuracy and scoring reliability [84]. Docking accuracy indicates how similar the prediction of ligand binding is to the ligand conformation that is determined experimentally, whereas scoring reliability ranks ligands based on their affinities. Docking accuracy and scoring reliability are used to assess the searching algorithm and the scoring functions, respectively, of docking software. The numerous searching algorithms used in docking software vary with respect to randomness, speed, and the area covered. Most of the searching algorithms perform well when tested against the known structure. In contrast, scoring functions are rarely successful, and a number of issues needed to be addressed to improve the docking features. Many types of docking software are currently available; AutoDock is a software that is highly accessed and freely available [85]. At present, as protein-nanoparticle complexes are difficult to study using experimental approaches, computational tools show promise. Structural models for carbon nanomaterials such as carbon nanotubes and fullerenes are available, and thus many protein-nanoparticle interactions can be studied computationally. Fullerenols, which are derivatives of fullerenes, are currently in trial for diagnostic and therapeutic uses, although insufficient information is available about the structural interactions and toxicity of fullerenols in biosystems. Yang et al. computationally studied the interactions in the fullerenol-lysozyme complex and compared the computational results with experimental results [86]. The structure of fullerenol was constructed using Chem3D Ultra and subjected to blind docking in the active site of chicken lysozyme. The fullerenol bound close to Tryptophan 62, and a π–π stacking interaction was observed. The predicted computational binding result was consistent with all known experimental results. As a result, new proteins that can interact with fullerenol can be identified for future applications as drug targets [87]. The addition of molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to docking studies can also assist in studying interactions. A list of well-known docking software is provided in Table 4.

5.2. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR)

QSAR is based on the idea that similar structural properties generate similar biological effects [94]. It is used to establish associations between the structural and electronic properties of potential drug candidates along with their binding affinities for common macromolecular targets that are widely used in drug discovery. QSAR studies were originally based on a single physicochemical property such as the solubility or the pKa (acid dissociation constant) value to elucidate the biological effect of a molecule (one-dimensional QSAR). Two-dimensional QSAR further examines the connectivity of a compound by considering the physicochemical properties of single atoms and functional groups and their roles in biological activity. Current models contain three-dimensional structural descriptors such as the length or width of a substituent. With a suitable force field, it is theoretically possible to determine the feasible binding mode of any given existing molecule to a target protein. Most three-dimensional QSAR models depend on the superposition of ligands, the identification of which is impossible without sufficient structural information for the target protein. The results of QSAR can be used to understand the interactions occurring between functional groups in the molecules with those of their target. QSAR methods are fast and can deal with real complex biological systems. QSAR models provide an alternative to animal testing and offer the advantages of reduced time for experimentation and minimized costs [95]. A few QSAR studies related to nanoparticles have been published to date [96–100]. QSAR can also predict the toxicity of nanoparticles. In addition, it can support targeting and filling gaps in knowledge for known nanoparticles [101]. QSAR tools are presented in Table 5. Recent reviews provide clear future directions for the field [102,103].

High-Throughput Screening Data Analysis Tools (HDAT)

HDAT is a set of web-based high-throughput screening (HTS) data analysis tools [110,111]. The use of HTS in toxicity studies of engineered nanomaterials requires tools for quick and consistent processing and analyses of large HTS datasets. To facilitate this, a web-based platform was developed that presents statistical methods appropriate for toxicity data on engineered nanomaterials. It also offers different plate normalization methods, different HTS summarization statistics, self-organizing map (SOM)-based clustering analysis, and visualization of raw and processed information using heat maps and SOMs. HDAT has been successfully applied in the analysis of a number of HTS studies on the toxicity of engineered nanomaterials, thus enabling analysis of toxicity mechanisms and the development of data-driven structure-activity relationships for nanomaterial toxicity. HDAT offers online instructions and video demonstrations of basic operations such as data formatting and data uploading.

5.3. MD Simulations

The most broadly used computational technique is MD simulation, which elucidates the structure-function relationships in biomolecules. In MD simulation, atoms and molecules are allowed to interact over time at a given temperature and are assumed to follow the laws of classical mechanics. MD simulation offers a detailed description of atomic motion, and the forces acting on the atoms are computed using a model known as a force field [158]. Such a simulation may serve as a “computational microscope” [159] that reveals interactions that may be difficult to observe experimentally. Dror et al. explained MD simulation as follows: “Static structural information might be likened to a photograph of a football game; to understand more readily how the game is played, we want a video recording” [159]. Computer simulation of biomolecule-nanomaterial interactions is gaining popularity as a complement to experimental techniques. When entering human bodies, nanoparticles interact with biomolecules and begin a series of nanoparticle/biological interactions that rely upon on forces as well as dynamic biophysicochemical interactions [11]. Many interactions such as hydrogen bonds, Van der Waals (VDW) forces, and electrostatic, hydrophobic, and π–π stacking interactions contribute to these protein-nanoparticle complexes [11]. The VDW attraction increases with increase in the proximity of the atoms at the interface, within a distance close to the total of the VDW radii of the two atoms. The VDW force acts at a short range and reduces significantly as the contacting atoms depart (Lennard-Jones potential or 6–12 potential). Hydrogen bonding is another important player in intermolecular interactions. Although the hydrogen bond is much stronger than the VDW interaction, the number of hydrogen bonds connecting proteins and nanoparticle is much smaller than that of VDW interactions. Hydrophobic interactions are an entropic effect originating from the repulsion of ordered water molecules from a nonpolar surface. The π–π stacking is an attraction involving aromatic rings. However, as only a few amino acids contain aromatic rings and the rings are often buried within the hydrophobic core of the proteins, only specific interactions are possible. A recently published review of molecular modeling in structural nanotoxicology discusses methods for predicting interactions between nanomaterials and biomolecules [160]. The review also discusses how nanoparticles of different sizes, shapes, structures, and chemical properties are able to influence the organization and function of nanomachinery in cells. In summary, computer modeling studies have become a dominant tool in risk assessment studies. The molecular modeling tools currently available are shown in Table 6.

6. Imaging

Medical imaging technologies are used for diagnosis as well as for many other biomedical applications. The use of nanomaterials in imaging applications is growing rapidly. Molecular imaging can assist in early diagnosis and also provides information on pathological processes. Compared with currently used fluorescent proteins and small-molecule dyes, nanotechnology imaging probes can offer signals that are several-fold brighter and more stable. Nanoparticles, predominantly those made of precious metals, enhance signals in imaging approaches. For example, semiconductor quantum dots are tiny light-emitting particles that are used as fluorescent probes for molecular imaging and medical diagnostics. However, there are still many disadvantages associated with imaging technologies, such as tissue specificity and systemic toxicity. Progress in nanotechnology may overcome these challenges and offer more sensitive and specific information [177]. In vivo and in vitro imaging applications of nanomaterials have been reviewed [3,178]. The new informatics methods link tissue banks with histology data in order to offer enhanced image annotation down to the nano level [13]. Due to the increase in the use of image analysis tools and methods in medical applications, well-supported tools and databases that can be used for nanotechnology have become increasingly available; these are shown in Table 7 [179]. Image databases and tools used in fluorescence microscopy can also be used to enhance image annotation with novel methods as the amount of experimental data at the nanolevel grows.

7. Computational Design of Biomolecular Nanostructures

DNA and protein self-assemblies are used to build nanostructures because of the programmability property of DNA and protein and the surplus of chemical techniques available for their manipulation. For example, DNA is a valuable self-assembly material because, with appropriate design of its base sequences, assembly is enabled through specific interactions among complementary base pairs [180]. Many self-assembly molecules that can be used as vehicles for drug delivery are built using DNA [181]. Some of the software currently available for designing three-dimensional structures of carbon nanotubes and for DNA origami design is listed in Table 8.

8. Specific Challenges and Opportunities in Nanoinformatics

The databases and tools presented here highlight the increasing resources that are available to users. Their improvement is accompanied by the continuous expansion in the number of databases (Table 1) and various computer programs (Tables 6 and 7). The new database initiatives such as ISA-TAB-Nano, caNanoLab, and Nanomaterial Registry will facilitate data sharing, data standards, and, depending on the growth of nanomaterials data, the development of methods and tools specific to the nanolevel. Moreover, the growth of these fields essentially requires that the ISA-TAB-Nano standard be adopted by journals and other organizations to ensure consistent representation of nanotechnological data [19]. It should be noted that open accessibility and the liberty to use published DNA sequences in databases such as GenBank has encouraged scientists to build powerful methods, tools, and resources that have substantially enriched the field of bioinformatics [24]. It should also be noted that nanomaterial data are much more complex than sequence information or molecular data. An additional challenge is the lack of availability of scientific literature from subscription-based journals in nanotechnology, particularly in chemistry, for which even abstracts are inaccessible for large-scale analyses such as text mining; this is a big drawback for text mining and nanoinformatics analysis [193]. With respect to QSAR, a recent review provided a summary of the advances and a clear roadmap for future research and also identified major gaps in the field [102]. Molecular modeling and imaging in nanotoxicology appear promising, as many software tools mentioned in this review are free under the General Public License, so that that there is freedom to use, study, share, and modify the software. Although the modeling behavior of nanomaterials presents different challenges compared to those for drugs, it is nonetheless possible to adapt new methods and develop specific tools from existing tools. There are also anticipated beneficial side effects of nanoinformatics development, such as the possible minimization of animal studies. Recent initiatives and efforts emerging from the nanotechnology community are encouraging.

9. Conclusions

The databases and tools presented herein will be helpful to the nanotechnology community. We highlight the following recommendations that we hope will assist this community: (i) Consensus standards and ontology terms should be used in nanotechnology-related research; (ii) Journals should adopt formats to ensure uniform representation of information; (iii) Authors should submit their data to the databases; (iv) Similar to the current model of molecular biology databases, free and unrestricted access to nanomaterial data would enable nanoinformatics researchers to create tools that will benefit the broad nanotechnology community; (v) Open access and freely available nanotechnology literature will also benefit the nanotechnology community.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mid-Career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2012-016803) and partly supported by a grant from the Priority Research Centers Program, Korea (NRF 2012-0006687).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  • Author ContributionsS.P. obtained and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; S.C. supervised the work and wrote the manuscript.

References

  1. Albanese, A.; Tang, P.S.; Chan, W.C. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng 2012, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Toumey, C. Why not zwergo-technology? Nat. Nanotechnol 2011, 6, 393–394. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, B.Y.; Rutka, J.T.; Chan, W.C. Nanomedicine. N. Engl. J. Med 2010, 363, 2434–2443. [Google Scholar]
  4. Makarucha, A.J.; Todorova, N.; Yarovsky, I. Nanomaterials in biological environment: A review of computer modelling studies. Eur. Biophys. J 2011, 40, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nie, S.; Xing, Y.; Kim, G.J.; Simons, J.W. Nanotechnology applications in cancer. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng 2007, 9, 257–288. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yokel, R.A.; Macphail, R.C. Engineered nanomaterials: Exposures, hazards, and risk prevention. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol 2011, 6, 7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Love, S.A.; Maurer-Jones, M.A.; Thompson, J.W.; Lin, Y.S.; Haynes, C.L. Assessing nanoparticle toxicity. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem 2012, 5, 181–205. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bharali, D.J.; Khalil, M.; Gurbuz, M.; Simone, T.M.; Mousa, S.A. Nanoparticles and cancer therapy: A concise review with emphasis on dendrimers. Int. J. Nanomed 2009, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Buzea, C.; Pacheco, I.I.; Robbie, K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2007, 2, 17–71. [Google Scholar]
  10. De la Iglesia, D.; Garcia-Remesal, M.; de la Calle, G.; Kulikowski, C.; Sanz, F.; Maojo, V. The impact of computer science in molecular medicine: Enabling high-throughput research. Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2013, 13, 526–575. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yang, S.T.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.W.; Cao, A. Biosafety and bioapplication of nanomaterials by designing protein-nanoparticle interactions. Small 2013, 9, 1635–1653. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nanoinformatics. Available online: http://nanoinformatics.org/nanoinformatics/index.php/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  13. Maojo, V.; Fritts, M.; de la Iglesia, D.; Cachau, R.E.; Garcia-Remesal, M.; Mitchell, J.A.; Kulikowski, C. Nanoinformatics: A new area of research in nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed 2012, 7, 3867–3890. [Google Scholar]
  14. NNI Signature Initiative. Available online: http://www.nano.gov/sites/default/files/nki_nsi_white_paper_-_may_14_2012_secured.pdf accessed on 14 March 2014.
  15. The ACTION-Grid White Paper on Nanoinformatics. Available online: http://www.action-grid.eu/documents/Final%20White%20Paper%20-%20Nano.pdf accessed on 14 March 2014.
  16. Ostraat, M.L.; Mills, K.C.; Guzan, K.A.; Murry, D. The Nanomaterial Registry: Facilitating the sharing and analysis of data in the diverse nanomaterial community. Int. J. Nanomed 2013, 8 Suppl 1, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sharon, G.; George, W.H.; Stephanie, A.M.; Michal, L.; Mervi, H.; Juli, D.K. Cananolab: Data sharing to expedite the use of nanotechnology in biomedicine. Comput. Sci. Discov 2013, 6, 014010. [Google Scholar]
  18. De la Iglesia, D.; Cachau, R.E.; García-Remesal, M.; Maojo, V. Nanoinformatics knowledge infrastructures: Bringing efficient information management to nanomedical research. Comput. Sci. Discov 2013, 6, 014011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas, D.G.; Gaheen, S.; Harper, S.L.; Fritts, M.; Klaessig, F.; Hahn-Dantona, E.; Paik, D.; Pan, S.; Stafford, G.A.; Freund, E.T.; et al. ISA-TAB-Nano: A specification for sharing nanomaterial research data in spreadsheet-based format. BMC Biotechnol 2013, 13, 2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Inkscape Is a Professional Vector Graphics. Available online: http://www.inkscape.org/en/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  21. GIMP—The GNU Image Manipulation Program. Available online: http://www.gimp.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  22. Genbank. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  23. Protein Data Bank. Available online: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do accessed on 14 March 2014.
  24. Brown, P.O.; Eisen, M.B.; Varmus, H.E. Why PLoS became a publisher. PLoS Biol 2003, 1, e36. [Google Scholar]
  25. Fox, J.A.; Butland, S.L.; McMillan, S.; Campbell, G.; Ouellette, B.F. The bioinformatics links directory: A compilation of molecular biology web servers. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33, W3–W24. [Google Scholar]
  26. Web Server Issue. Available online: http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/W1.toc accessed on 14 March 2014.
  27. González-Nilo, F.; Pérez-Acle, T.; Guínez-Molinos, S.; Geraldo, D.A.; Sandoval, C.; Yévenes, A.; Santos, L.S.; Laurie, V.F.; Mendoza, H.; Cachau, R.E. Nanoinformatics: An emerging area of information technology at the intersection of bioinformatics, computational chemistry and nanobiotechnology. Biol. Res 2011, 44, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nanomaterial-Biological Interactions Knowledgebase. Available online: http://nbi.oregonstate.edu/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  29. Internano—Resources for Nanomanufacturing. Available online: http://www.internano.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  30. Nano-EHS Database Analysis Tool. Available online: http://icon.rice.edu/report.cfm accessed on 14 March 2014.
  31. Nanoparticle Information Library. Available online: http://nanoparticlelibrary.net/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  32. Nanomaterial Registry. Available online: https://www.nanomaterialregistry.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  33. National Toxicology Program Database. Available online: http://tools.niehs.nih.gov/ntp_tox/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  34. Nano-HUB Database. Available online: http://nanohub.org/resources/databases accessed on 14 March 2014.
  35. National Center for Biomedical Ontology. Available online: http://www.bioontology.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  36. ISA-TAB-Nano. Available online: https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/ICR/ISA-TAB-Nano accessed on 14 March 2014.
  37. caNanoLab. Available online: https://cananolab.nci.nih.gov/caNanoLab/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  38. Toxicology Data Network. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  39. Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory. Available online: http://ncl.cancer.gov/objectives_ncl_obj5.asp accessed on 14 March 2014.
  40. The Collaboratory for Structural Nanobiology. Available online: http://csn.ncifcrf.gov/Advanced_Structure_Analysis/HOME.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  41. Toxicology Literature Online. Available online: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?TOXLINE accessed on 14 March 2014.
  42. OECD Database on Research into the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Available online: http://webnet.oecd.org/NANOMATERIALS/Pagelet/Front/Default.aspx accessed on 14 March 2014.
  43. Schuurman, N.; Leszczynski, A. Ontologies for bioinformatics. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2008, 2, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  44. Bard, J.B.; Rhee, S.Y. Ontologies in biology: Design, applications and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet 2004, 5, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  45. Thomas, D.G.; Klaessig, F.; Harper, S.L.; Fritts, M.; Hoover, M.D.; Gaheen, S.; Stokes, T.H.; Reznik-Zellen, R.; Freund, E.T.; Klemm, J.D.; et al. Informatics and standards for nanomedicine technology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol 2011, 3, 511–532. [Google Scholar]
  46. NanoParticle Ontology for Cancer Nanotechnology Research. Available online: http://www.nano-ontology.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  47. BioPortal. Available online: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  48. The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies. Available online: http://www.obofoundry.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  49. caOBR—A Tool for Indexing Cancer Informatics Resources. Available online: http://www.bioontology.org/caOBR accessed on 14 March 2014.
  50. The Database and Ontology of Chemical Entities of Biological Interest. Available online: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  51. The Gene Ontology. Available online: http://www.geneontology.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  52. The Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology. Available online: http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/AboutFM.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  53. Zebrafish Anatomy and Development Ontology. Available online: http://www.obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=zebrafish_anatomy accessed on 14 March 2014.
  54. Ontology Lookup Service. Available online: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=REX accessed on 14 March 2014.
  55. Phenotypic Quality Ontology. Available online: http://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/PATO accessed on 14 March 2014.
  56. Cohen, K.B.; Hunter, L. Getting started in text mining. PLoS Comput. Biol 2008, 4, e20. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rzhetsky, A.; Seringhaus, M.; Gerstein, M.B. Getting started in text mining: Part two. PLoS Comput. Biol 2009, 5, e1000411. [Google Scholar]
  58. Grulke, C.M.; Goldsmith, M.R.; Vallero, D.A. Toward a blended ontology: Applying knowledge systems to compare therapeutic and toxicological nanoscale domains. J. Biomed. Biotechnol 2012, 2012, 308381. [Google Scholar]
  59. Garcia-Remesal, M.; Garcia-Ruiz, A.; Perez-Rey, D.; de la Iglesia, D.; Maojo, V. Using nanoinformatics methods for automatically identifying relevant nanotoxicology entities from the literature. Biomed. Res. Int 2013, 2013, 410294. [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu, R.; France, B.; George, S.; Rallo, R.; Zhang, H.; Xia, T.; Nel, A.E.; Bradley, K.; Cohen, Y. Association rule mining of cellular responses induced by metal and metal oxide nanoparticles. Analyst 2014, 139, 943–953. [Google Scholar]
  61. Google Scholar. Available online: http://scholar.google.com accessed on 14 March 2014.
  62. Gopubmed. Available online: http://www.gopubmed.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  63. Textpresso. Available online: http://www.textpresso.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  64. BioRAT. Available online: http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/software_downloads/biorat/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  65. iHOP. Available online: http://www.ihop-net.org/UniPub/iHOP/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  66. Lewar, E.G. Computational Chemistry: Introduction to the Theory and Applications of Molecular and Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  67. Molecular Mechanics and Dynamics. Available online: http://employees.csbsju.edu/hjakubowski/classes/ch331/protstructure/mechdynam2.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  68. PyMOL. Available online: http://www.pymol.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  69. RasMol. Available online: http://www.bernstein-plus-sons.com/software/rasmol/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  70. Raster3D. Available online: http://skuld.bmsc.washington.edu/raster3d/raster3d.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  71. UCSF Chimera. Available online: http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/index.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  72. Visual Molecular Dynamics. Available online: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  73. Cn3D Is a Macromolecular Structure Viewer. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/CN3D/cn3d.shtml accessed on 14 March 2014.
  74. BALL—Biochemical Algorithms Library. Available online: http://www.ball-project.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  75. Jmol. Available online: http://jmol.sourceforge.net/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  76. ICM-Browser. Available online: http://www.molsoft.com/icm_browser.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  77. Chemkit. Available online: http://sourceforge.net/projects/chemkit/files/chemkit-0.1.tar.gz/download accessed on 14 March 2014.
  78. OpenStructure. Available online: http://www.openstructure.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  79. VEGA, Z.Z. Available online: http://www.vegazz.net/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  80. Molekel. Available online: http://molekel.cscs.ch/wiki/pmwiki.php accessed on 14 March 2014.
  81. Avogadro. Available online: http://avogadro.cc/wiki/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  82. Xeo. Available online: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xeo/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  83. ChemSketch. Available online: http://www.acdlabs.com/resources/freeware/chemsketch/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  84. Hu, X.; Shelver, W.H. Docking studies of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors: Zinc parameter optimization to improve the binding free energy prediction. J. Mol. Graph. Model 2003, 22, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
  85. Morris, G.M.; Huey, R.; Olson, A.J. Using autoDock for ligand-receptor docking. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yang, S.T.; Wang, H.; Guo, L.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cao, A. Interaction of fullerenol with lysozyme investigated by experimental and computational approaches. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 395101. [Google Scholar]
  87. Calvaresi, M.; Zerbetto, F. Baiting Proteins with C60. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 2283–2299. [Google Scholar]
  88. AutoDock 4. Available online: http://autodock.scripps.edu/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  89. AutoDock Vina. Available online: http://vina.scripps.edu/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  90. Dock. Available online: http://dock.compbio.ucsf.edu/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  91. GOLD. Available online: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Solutions/GoldSuite/Pages/GOLD.aspx accessed on 14 March 2014.
  92. FlexX. Available online: http://www.biosolveit.de/FlexX/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  93. Surflex-Dock. Available online: http://www.tripos.com/index.php?family=modules,SimplePage,,,&page=surflex_dock&s=0 accessed on 14 March 2014.
  94. Tropsha, A. Best Practices for QSAR model development, validation, and exploitation. Mol. Inf 2010, 29, 476–488. [Google Scholar]
  95. Mays, C.; Benfenati, E.; Pardoe, S. Use and perceived benefits and barriers of QSAR models for reach: Findings from a questionnaire to stakeholders. Chem. Cent. J 2012, 6, 159. [Google Scholar]
  96. Toropov, A.A.; Toropova, A.P.; Benfenati, E.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Smiles-based optimal descriptors: QSAR analysis of fullerene-based HIV-1 pr inhibitors by means of balance of correlations. J. Comput. Chem 2010, 31, 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  97. Fourches, D.; Pu, D.; Tassa, C.; Weissleder, R.; Shaw, S.Y.; Mumper, R.J.; Tropsha, A. Quantitative nanostructure—Activity relationship modeling. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 5703–5712. [Google Scholar]
  98. Fourches, D.; Pu, D.; Tropsha, A. Exploring quantitative nanostructure-activity relationships (QNAR) modeling as a tool for predicting biological effects of manufactured nanoparticles. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 2011, 14, 217–225. [Google Scholar]
  99. Puzyn, T.; Rasulev, B.; Gajewicz, A.; Hu, X.; Dasari, T.P.; Michalkova, A.; Hwang, H.M.; Toropov, A.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J. Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat. Nano 2011, 6, 175–178. [Google Scholar]
  100. Liu, R.; Rallo, R.; George, S.; Ji, Z.; Nair, S.; Nel, A.E.; Cohen, Y. Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Small 2011, 7, 1118–1126. [Google Scholar]
  101. Poater, A.; Saliner, A.G.; Solà, M.; Cavallo, L.; Worth, A.P. Computational methods to predict the reactivity of nanoparticles through structure–property relationships. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv 2010, 7, 295–305. [Google Scholar]
  102. Winkler, D.A.; Mombelli, E.; Pietroiusti, A.; Tran, L.; Worth, A.; Fadeel, B.; McCall, M.J. Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: Current status and future potential. Toxicology 2013, 313, 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  103. Epa, V.C.; Burden, F.R.; Tassa, C.; Weissleder, R.; Shaw, S.; Winkler, D.A. Modeling biological activities of nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2012, 12, 5808–5812. [Google Scholar]
  104. ChemProp. Available online: http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=10684 accessed on 14 March 2014.
  105. OECD. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  106. RmSquare. Available online: http://aptsoftware.co.in/rmsquare/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  107. T.E.S.T. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/qsar/qsar.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  108. Virtual Computational Chemical Laboratory. Available online: http://www.vcclab.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  109. CORAL. Available online: http://www.insilico.eu/coral/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  110. Rong, L.; Taimur, H.; Robert, R.; Yoram, C. HDAT: Web-based high-throughput screening data analysis tools. Comput. Sci. Discov 2013, 6, 014006. [Google Scholar]
  111. High Throughput Screening Data Analysis Tools (HDAT). Available online: http://nanoinfo.org/hdat/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  112. Assisted Model Building with Energy Refinement. Available online: http://ambermd.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  113. NAMD—Scalable Molecular Dynamics. Available online: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  114. Gromacs. Available online: http://www.gromacs.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  115. Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics. Available online: http://www.charmm.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  116. Desmond. Available online: http://www.deshawresearch.com/resources_desmond.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  117. LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator. Available online: http://lammps.sandia.gov/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  118. TINKER—Software Tools for Molecular Design. Available online: http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  119. MDynaMix: A Molecular Dynamics Program. Available online: http://www.mmk.su.se/~sasha/mdynamix/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  120. CP2K—Open Source Molecular Dynamics. Available online: http://www.cp2k.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  121. ABINIT. Available online: http://www.abinit.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  122. Advanced Concepts in Electronic Structure. Available online: http://www.qtp.ufl.edu/ACES/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  123. BigDFT. Available online: http://bigdft.org/Wiki/index.php?title=BigDFT_website accessed on 14 March 2014.
  124. Quantum Monte Carlo. Available online: http://vallico.net/casinoqmc/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  125. CASTEP. Available online: http://www.castep.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  126. The Columbus Quantum Chemistry Programs. Available online: http://www.univie.ac.at/columbus/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  127. Coupled-Cluster Techniques for Computational Chemistry. Available online: http://www.cfour.de/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  128. Conquest: Linear Scaling DFT. Available online: http://www.order-n.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  129. CPMD. Available online: http://www.cpmd.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  130. A Computational Tool for Solid State Chemistry and Physics. Available online: http://www.crystal.unito.it/index.php accessed on 14 March 2014.
  131. Dacapo Is a Total Energy Program Based on Density Functional Theory. Available online: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/dacapo accessed on 14 March 2014.
  132. Dalton. Available online: http://daltonprogram.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  133. Density Functional Based Tight Binding. Available online: http://www.dftb-plus.info/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  134. DIRAC—Program for Atomic and Molecular Direct Iterative Relativistic All-electron Calculations. Available online: http://www.diracprogram.org/doku.php accessed on 14 March 2014.
  135. The Elk FP-LAPW Code. Available online: http://elk.sourceforge.net/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  136. ErgoSCF Is a Quantum Chemistry Program for Large-Scale Self-Consistent Field Calculations. Available online: http://www.ergoscf.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  137. ERKALE Is a Quantum Chemistry Program Used to Solve the Electronic Structure of Atoms, Molecules and Molecular Clusters. Available online: https://code.google.com/p/erkale/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  138. FLEUR—The Julich FLAPW Code Family. Available online: http://www.flapw.de/pm/index.php accessed on 14 March 2014.
  139. FreeON Is a Suite of Programs for Linear Scaling Quantum Chemistry. Available online: https://www.freeon.org/index.php/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  140. The General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System (GAMESS) Is a General ab initio Quantum Chemistry Package. Available online: http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/gamess/index.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  141. Grid-Based Projector-Augmented Wave Method. Available online: https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  142. Gaussian. Available online: http://www.gaussian.com/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  143. Joint Density Functional Theory. Available online: http://sourceforge.net/p/jdftx/wiki/Home/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  144. Multiresolution Adaptive Numerical Environment for Scientific Simulation. Available online: http://code.google.com/p/m-a-d-n-e-s-s/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  145. A Practical Quantum Chemistry Tool for Modeling Biological Systems and Co-Crystals. Available online: http://cacheresearch.com/mopac/Mopac2002manual/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  146. The Massively Parallel Quantum Chemistry Program. Available online: http://www.mpqc.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  147. NWChem—Delivering High-Performance Computational Chemistry. Available online: http://www.nwchem-sw.org/index.php/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  148. Octopus Is a Scientific Program Aimed at the Ab Initio Virtual Experimentation. Available online: http://www.tddft.org/programs/octopus/wiki/index.php/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  149. ONTEP Is a Linear-Scaling Code for Quantum-Mechanical Calculations Based on Density-Functional Theory. Available online: http://www2.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/onetep/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  150. OpenAtom Is a Highly Scalable and Portable Parallel Application for Molecular Dynamics Simulations at the Quantum Level. Available online: http://charm.cs.uiuc.edu/OpenAtom/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  151. Open Source Package for Material Explorer. Available online: http://www.openmx-square.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  152. The ORCA Program Is to Carry out Geometry Optimizations and to Predict a Large Number of Spectroscopic Parameters at Different Levels of Theory. Available online: http://www.cec.mpg.de/forum/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  153. PSI4—Ab Initio Quantum Chemistry Program. Available online: http://www.psicode.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  154. PyQuante—Python Quantum Chemistry. Available online: http://pyquante.sourceforge.net/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  155. Quantum Espresso Is an Integrated Suite of Open-Source Computer Codes for Electronic-Structure Calculations and Materials Modeling at the Nanoscale. Available online: http://www.quantum-espresso.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  156. Vienna Ab Initio Simulation Package. Available online: http://www.vasp.at/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  157. Yambo Is a FORTRAN/C Code for Many-Body Calculations in Solid State and Molecular Physics. Available online: http://www.yambo-code.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  158. Dodson, G.G.; Lane, D.P.; Verma, C.S. Molecular simulations of protein dynamics: New windows on mechanisms in biology. EMBO Rep 2008, 9, 144–150. [Google Scholar]
  159. Dror, R.O.; Dirks, R.M.; Grossman, J.P.; Xu, H.; Shaw, D.E. Biomolecular simulation: A computational microscope for molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Biophys 2012, 41, 429–452. [Google Scholar]
  160. Yanamala, N.; Kagan, V.E.; Shvedova, A.A. Molecular modeling in structural nano-toxicology: Interactions of nano-particles with nano-machinery of cells. Adv. Drug Deliv Rev 2013, 65, 2070–2077. [Google Scholar]
  161. Micro-Manager Open Source Microscopy Software. Available online: http://www.micro-manager.org/wiki/Micro-Manager accessed on 14 March 2014.
  162. OMERO. Available online: http://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/products/omero accessed on 14 March 2014.
  163. Bisque Database. Available online: http://www.bioimage.ucsb.edu/bisque accessed on 14 March 2014.
  164. Bio-Formats Is a Standalone Java Library for Reading and Writing Life Sciences Image file Formats. Available online: http://loci.wisc.edu/software/bio-formats accessed on 14 March 2014.
  165. Image Processing and Analysis in Java. Available online: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  166. Fiji Is an Image Processing Package. Available online: http://fiji.sc/Fiji accessed on 14 March 2014.
  167. Quantitative Tool for Studying Complex and Dynamic Biological Microenvironments from 4D/5D Microscopy Data. Available online: http://farsight-toolkit.org/wiki/Main_Page accessed on 14 March 2014.
  168. Icy—An Open Community Platform for Bioimage Informatics. Available online: http://icy.bioimageanalysis.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  169. Cellprofiler—Cell Image Analysis Software. Available online: http://www.cellprofiler.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  170. Micropiolot—Microscope Automation. Available online: http://www.embl.de/services/core_facilities/almf/services/high-throughput-microscopy/microscope-automation/micropilot/index.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  171. Cell-ID Is an Open-Source Cell-Finding, Tracking, and Analysis Package. Available online: http://www.molsci.org/protocols/software.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  172. BioView3D Is an Open Source and Cross-Platform Application Intended for Biologists to Visualize 3D Stack Imagery. Available online: http://www.bioimage.ucsb.edu/downloads/BioView3D accessed on 14 March 2014.
  173. Vaa3D Is a Swiss Army Knife for Bioimage Visualization & Analysis. Available online: http://penglab.janelia.org/proj/vaa3d/Vaa3D/About_Vaa3D.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  174. The IMOD Is a Set of Image Processing, Modeling and Display Programs. Available online: http://bio3d.colorado.edu/imod/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  175. iCluster SubCellular Localisation Image Visualiser. Available online: http://icluster.imb.uq.edu.au/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  176. ImageSurfer Is free 3D Imaging Software to Visualize and Analyze Multi-Channel Volumes. Available online: http://imagesurfer.cs.unc.edu/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  177. Rosen, J.E.; Yoffe, S.; Meerasa, A.; Verma, M.; Gu, F.X. Nanotechnology and diagnostic imaging: New advances in contrast agent technology. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol 2011, 2, 115. [Google Scholar]
  178. Kostarelos, K.; Bianco, A.; Prato, M. Promises, facts and challenges for carbon nanotubes in imaging and therapeutics. Nat. Nano 2009, 4, 627–633. [Google Scholar]
  179. Hamilton, N.A. Open source tools for fluorescent imaging. Methods Enzymol 2012, 504, 393–417. [Google Scholar]
  180. Sanderson, K. Bioengineering: What to make with DNA origami. Nature 2010, 464, 158–159. [Google Scholar]
  181. Zhao, Y.X.; Shaw, A.; Zeng, X.; Benson, E.; Nystrom, A.M.; Hogberg, B. DNA origami delivery system for cancer therapy with tunable release properties. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 8684–8691. [Google Scholar]
  182. Tiamat Is a Graphical User Interface Program for the Design of DNA Nanostructures and Sequences. Available online: http://yanlab.asu.edu/Resources.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  183. Computer-Aided Engineering for DNA Origami. Available online: http://cando-dna-origami.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  184. DNA Origami Design Software. Available online: http://www.cdna.dk/default.asp?getreq=%2Findex.php%2Fsoftware.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  185. Cadnano Simplifies and Enhances the Process of Designing Three-Dimensional DNA Origami Nanostructures. Available online: http://cadnano.org/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  186. Uniquimer3D Is a User-Friendly Software System for Structural DNA Nanotechnology. Available online: http://ihome.ust.hk/~keymix/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  187. Contub Is a Set of Tools Dedicated to the Construction of Complex Carbon Nanotube Structures for Use in Computational Chemistry. Available online: http://www.ugr.es/~gmdm/java/contub/contub.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  188. A Program for Creating Fullerene Structures and for Performing Topological Analyses. Available online: http://ctcp.massey.ac.nz/index.php?group=&page=fullerenes&menu=fullerenes accessed on 14 March 2014.
  189. CS Catalyst. Available online: http://www.camsoft.co.kr/chemnews/catalyst/5/51/bucky.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  190. Ninithi Is a Free Modeling Software Used in Nanotechnology. Available online: http://sourceforge.net/projects/ninithi/files/ accessed on 14 March 2014.
  191. TubeGen Is a Web Accessible Nanotube Structure Generator. Available online: http://turin.nss.udel.edu/research/tubegenonline.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  192. Nanotube Coordinate Generator with a Viewer for Windows. Available online: http://www.photon.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~maruyama/wrapping3/wrapping.html accessed on 14 March 2014.
  193. Van Noorden, R. Tensions grow as data-mining discussions fall apart. Nature 2013, 498, 14–15. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 15 07158f1 1024
Figure 1. Comparison of the sizes of nanomaterials with those of other common materials. Figures were drawn using Inkscape [20] and GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) [21]. All the images in this figure were obtained from Wikimedia Commons.
Figure 1. Comparison of the sizes of nanomaterials with those of other common materials. Figures were drawn using Inkscape [20] and GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) [21]. All the images in this figure were obtained from Wikimedia Commons.
Ijms 15 07158f1
Ijms 15 07158f2 1024
Figure 2. Summary of data available from caNanoLab.
Figure 2. Summary of data available from caNanoLab.
Ijms 15 07158f2
Ijms 15 07158f3 1024
Figure 3. Data available from the Nanomaterial Registry.
Figure 3. Data available from the Nanomaterial Registry.
Ijms 15 07158f3
Table
Table 1. Summary of nanotechnology-related databases.
Table 1. Summary of nanotechnology-related databases.
No.NameDescriptionUrl
1Nanomaterial Biological Interactions KnowledgebaseThe knowledgebase serves as a repository for annotated data on nanomaterial characterization (purity, size, shape, charge, composition, functionalization, and agglomeration state), synthesis methods, and nanomaterial-biological interactions.[28]
2InterNanoInterNano supports the information needs of the nanomanufacturing community by bringing together resources related to advances in applications, devices, metrology, and materials that will facilitate the commercial development and/or marketable application of nanotechnology.[29]
3Nano-EHS Database Analysis ToolThis web tool provides a quick and thorough synopsis of the Environment, Health and Safety Database.[30]
4Nanoparticle Information LibraryThe goal of the NIL is to help occupational health professionals, industrial users, worker groups, and researchers organize and share information on nanomaterials, including their health and safety-associated properties.[31]
5Nanomaterials RegistryThe Registry was established to provide researchers with a convenient data management and sharing plan.[32]
6National Toxicology Program DatabaseThe goal of this database is to develop and apply modern toxicology and molecular biology tools to identify substances in the environment that may affect human health.[33]
7Nano-HUB databaseNano-HUB offers a searchable online database of nanoBIO tools.[34]
8National Center for Biomedical Ontology BioportalA major focus involves the use of biomedical ontologies to aid in the management and analysis of data derived from complex experiments.[35]
9ISA-TAB-NanoThe ISA-TAB-Nano standard specifies the format for representing and sharing information about nanomaterials, small molecules, and biological specimens along with their assay characterization data (including metadata and summary data) using spreadsheet or TAB-delimited files.[36]
10caNanoLabcaNanoLab is a data-sharing portal designed to facilitate information sharing in the biomedical nanotechnology research community to expedite and validate the use of nanotechnology in biomedicine.[37]
11Toxicology Data NetworkIncludes databases on toxicology, hazardous chemicals, environmental health, and toxic releases.[38]
12Nanotechnology Characterization LaboratoryThe Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory performs and standardizes the preclinical characterization of nanomaterials intended for cancer therapeutics and diagnostics developed by researchers from academia, government, and industry.[39]
13Collaboratory for Structural NanobiologyA nanoinformatics service dedicated to the collection, curation, and correlation of structural, physicochemical, and biological and biomedical data.[40]
14Toxicology Literature OnlineProvides references from the toxicology literature.[41]
15OECDDatabase on research into the safety of manufactured nanomaterials.[42]
Table
Table 2. List of nanoparticle-related ontology resources.
Table 2. List of nanoparticle-related ontology resources.
No.NameDescriptionUrl
1NanoParticle OntologyThe NPO was developed to provide knowledge regarding the description, preparation, and characterization of nanomaterials in cancer nanotechnology research.[46]
2BioPortalBioPortal provides access to commonly used biomedical ontologies and tools for their analysis.[47]
3The Open Biological and Biomedical OntologiesA collaborative experiment involving developers of science-based ontologies who are establishing a set of principles for ontology development with the goal of creating a suite of orthogonal interoperable reference ontologies in the biomedical domain.[48]
4Cancer Open Biomedical ResourceA tool for indexing cancer nanotechnology informatics knowledge with open biomedical resources.[49]
5Chemical Entities of Biological InterestA database and ontology of chemical entities of biological interest.[50]
6Gene OntologyThe Gene Ontology project is a major bioinformatics initiative with the aim of standardizing the representation of gene and gene product attributes across species and databases.[51]
7Foundational Model of Anatomy ontologyThe Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology is an evolving computer-based knowledge source for biomedical informatics.[52]
8Zebrafish Anatomy and Development ontologyA structured, controlled vocabulary of the anatomy and development of the zebrafish.[53]
9Ontology Lookup ServiceProvides a web service interface to query multiple ontologies from a single location with a unified output format.[54]
10Phenotype Quality ontologyPhenotype Quality provides ontology of phenotypic qualities intended for use in a number of applications, primarily defining composite phenotypes and phenotype annotation.[55]
Table
Table 3. List of visualization tools.
Table 3. List of visualization tools.
No.NameOperating SystemLicenseUrl
1PyMOLWindows/GNU LinuxFree and commercial[68]
2RasMolWindows/GNU LinuxGNU General Public License[69]
3Raster3DGNU Linux/Unix/Mac OS XArtistic License[70]
4UCSF ChimeraWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XFree for non-commercial use[71]
5VMDWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS X/SolarisVMD License/Free to use[72]
6Cn3DWindows/Mac OS XFree to use[73]
7BALLViewWindows/GNU Linux/Unix/Mac OS XGNU Lesser General Public License[74]
8JmolWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU Lesser General Public License[75]
9ICM-BrowserWindows, Mac, and GNU LinuxCommercial software[76]
10ChemkitGNU LinuxBSD licenses (free to use)[77]
11OpenStructureGNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU Lesser General Public License[78]
12VEGA ZZWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS X/Silicon Graphics/Amiga OSCopyright (free for non-profit academic)[79]
13MolekelWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[80]
14AvogadroWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[81]
15XeoWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[82]
16ChemSketchGNU Linux/Mac OS XCommercial software (free for academic and personal use)[83]
Table
Table 4. List of tools available for docking.
Table 4. List of tools available for docking.
No.NameOperating SystemLicenseUrl
1Autodock 4Windows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[88]
2AutoDockVinaWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XApache license[89]
3DockWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XAcademic software license[90]
4GOLDWindows/GNU LinuxCommercial software[91]
5FlexXWindows/GNU LinuxCommercial software[92]
6Surflex-dockWindows/GNU LinuxCommercial software[93]
Table
Table 5. List of tools available for QSAR.
Table 5. List of tools available for QSAR.
No.NameOperating SystemUrl
1ChemPropWindows[104]
2OECD ToolBoxWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS X[105]
3RmSquareWeb based application[106]
4T.E.S.TWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS X[107]
5Virtual Computational Chemistry LaboratoryFew online servers and commercial software[108]
6CORALWindows[109]
Table
Table 6. List of tools available for molecular modeling.
Table 6. List of tools available for molecular modeling.
No.NameOperating SystemLicenseUrl
Molecular Dynamic Simulations
1AmberUnix-like systemsAcademic/Non-profit/Government: $400[112]
2NAMDWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS X/SolarisFree for academics[113]
3GromacsSolaris, Linux, OS X, Windows by Cygwin, any other Unix varietyGNU Lesser General Public License for version[114]
4CHARMMUnix-likeAcademic research groups for a $600 licensing fee[115]
5DesmondLinux/WindowsAcademic and Commercial[116]
6LAMMPSWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[117]
7TINKERWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XAvailable free of charge[118]
8MDynaMix-GNU Lesser General Public License[119]
9CP2KGNU LinuxGNU Lesser General Public License[120]
DFT/Ab initio/Monte Carlo/Semi-empirical calculations
10ABINITWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[121]
11ACESGNU Linux/SGIGNU General Public License[122]
12BigDFTCross-platformGNU General Public License[123]
13CASINOLinux related operating system/Windows by CygwinCharge-free license agreements for academics[124]
14CASTEP-Commercial software[125]
15COLUMBUSGNU LinuxObtained free of charge[126]
16CFOURGNU LinuxCharge-free license agreements for academics[127]
17CONQUESTGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[128]
18CPMDGNU LinuxCPMD License (free for non-profit)[129]
19CRYSTALWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XCommercial software[130]
20DACAPOGNU LinuxCAMP Open Software project[131]
21DALTONGNU LinuxCharge-free license agreements for academics[132]
22DFTB+GNU LinuxFree for academic, educational, and non-profit research[133]
23DIRACWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XCharge-free license agreements[134]
24ElkGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[135]
25ErgoSCFGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[136]
26ERKALEWindows/GNU LinuxGNU General Public License[137]
27FLEURGNU LinuxAcademic[138]
28FreeONGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[139]
29GAMESSWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XCharge free license agreements[140]
30GPAWGNU Linux/Mac OS X-[141]
31GaussianWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XCommercial software[142]
32JDFTxGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[143]
33MADNESSWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XGNU General Public License[144]
34MOPACWindows/GNU Linux/Mac OS XFree and Commercial[145]
35MPQGNU LinuxGNU Lesser General Public License[146]
36NWChemLinux, FreeBSD, Unix and like operating systems, Microsoft Windows, Mac OS XEducational Community License[147]
37OctopusGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[148]
38ONETEPGNU LinuxCommercial software[149]
39OpenAtomGNU Linux/Mac OS XFree for academic[150]
40OpenMXGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[151]
41ORCAGNU LinuxFree for academic[152]
42PSIGNU Linux/Windows, Mac OS XGNU General Public License[153]
43PyQuante-BSD licenses (free for academic)[154]
44Quantum ESPRESSOGNU LinuxOpen source distribution[155]
45VASPGNU LinuxCommercial software[156]
46Yambo CodeGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[157]
Table
Table 7. Summary of image-related databases and tools. All tools listed are freely available for use.
Table 7. Summary of image-related databases and tools. All tools listed are freely available for use.
No.NameOperating SystemLicenseUrl
1Micro-managerWindows and MacCopyright (distributed free of charge)[161]
2OMEROWindows, Mac and LinuxGNU General Public License and few commercial licenses[162]
3BisqueWindows, Mac and LinuxFree and open source[163]
4Bio-FormatsGNU LinuxGNU General Public License[164]
5ImageJWindows, Mac and GNU Linux (any java based)Public domain[165]
6FijiWindows, Mac OS X, GNU Linux and UnixGNU General Public License (the plugin interface is excluded from the license; some plugins have different licenses)[166]
7FARSIGHT TOOLKITWindows, Mac OS X and GNU LinuxApache License, Version 2.0[167]
8ICYWindows, Mac OS X and GNU LinuxGNU General Public License[168]
9CellProfilerWindows, Mac OS X, and GNU LinuxGNU General Public License and some portions are also BSD-licensed[169]
10Micro-PilotWindowsFree for academic users[170]
12Cell IDWindows and GNU LinuxGNU Lesser General Public License[171]
13bioView3DWindows, Mac OS X, and GNU LinuxOpen source (free for non-commercial)[172]
14V3DWindows, Mac and GNU LinuxFree for non-profit research[173]
15IMODWindows, Mac and GNU LinuxFree to use[174]
16iClusterWindows, Mac OS X, and GNU LinuxGNU General Public License[175]
17Image SurferWindows and MacFree to use[176]
Table
Table 8. Programs for DNA origami, nanomaterial design, and carbon nanotube design. All the tools listed are freely available for use.
Table 8. Programs for DNA origami, nanomaterial design, and carbon nanotube design. All the tools listed are freely available for use.
No.NameOperating SystemUrl
1TiamatWindows[182]
2caDNAnoWeb-Accessible[183]
3SARSEGNU Linux/Mac[184]
4cadnanoWindows, OSX and GNU Linux[185]
5Uniquimer3DWindows[186]
6CoNTubWindows, Mac OS X, GNU Linux and Unix[187]
7FullereneGNU Linux/Unix and Mac[188]
8CS CatalystWindows[189]
9NinithiWindows[190]
10TubeGenWeb-Accessible[191]
11WrappingWindows[192]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Panneerselvam, S.; Choi, S. Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available Tools. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 7158-7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15057158

AMA Style

Panneerselvam S, Choi S. Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available Tools. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(5):7158-7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15057158

Chicago/Turabian Style

Panneerselvam, Suresh, and Sangdun Choi. 2014. "Nanoinformatics: Emerging Databases and Available Tools" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 5: 7158-7182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15057158

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop