Next Article in Journal
Correction: Zainalabdeen, N., et al., Synthesis and Characterization of Naphthalenediimide-Functionalized Flavin Derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 7468–7479.
Previous Article in Journal
Structure of N-Terminal Sequence Asp-Ala-Glu-Phe-Arg-His-Asp-Ser of Aβ-Peptide with Phospholipase A2 from Venom of Andaman Cobra Sub-Species Naja naja sagittifera at 2.0 Å Resolution
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms15034237
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The First Insight into the Metabolite Profiling of Grapes from Three Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars of Two Controlled Appellation (DOC) Regions

by
António Teixeira
1,2,
Viviana Martins
1,2,
Henrique Noronha
1,2,
José Eiras-Dias
3 and
Hernâni Gerós
1,2,*
1
Center for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences (CITAB), Quinta de Prados, Vila Real 5001-801, Portugal
2
Research Group in Applied Plant Biology and Innovation in Agrofood-Agrobioplant, Department of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga 4710-057, Portugal
3
National Institute of Agrarian and Veterinary Research (INIAV), Quinta da Almoinha, Dois Portos 2565-191, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15(3), 4237-4254; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034237
Submission received: 11 February 2014 / Revised: 28 February 2014 / Accepted: 5 March 2014 / Published: 10 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The characterization of the metabolites accumulated in the grapes of specific cultivars grown in different climates is of particular importance for viticulturists and enologists. In the present study, the metabolite profiling of grapes from the cultivars, Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto, of two Portuguese Controlled Denomination of Origin (DOC) regions (Vinho Verde and Lisboa) was investigated by gas chromatography-coupled time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS) and an amino acid analyzer. Primary metabolites, including sugars, organic acids and amino acids, and some secondary metabolites were identified. Tartaric and malic acids and free amino acids accumulated more in grapes from vines of the DOC region of Vinho Verde than DOC Lisboa, but a principal component analysis (PCA) plot showed that besides the DOC region, the grape cultivar also accounted for the variance in the relative abundance of metabolites. Grapes from the cultivar, Alvarinho, were particularly rich in malic acid and tartaric acids in both DOC regions, but sucrose accumulated more in the DOC region of Vinho Verde.

1. Introduction

Among the major factors influencing wine character and quality, grape variety is the most important, followed by climate, then landscape and soil. Viticulture and wine production are extremely environmentally sensitive. Finding the best terroir requires spatially appropriate data in all forms, which is becoming more available. Understanding climate structure differences between locations helps define cultivar suitability for planting and wine style and quality [1]. The physiology of grapevine has already suffered from significant impacts of global climate change in recent decades, causing significant alterations in the composition of the fruit and wine. Among several limiting factors that affect growth in Mediterranean-type ecosystems, water deficit, along with high solar radiation and extreme temperatures, are the most important ones. The combined effect of drought, high air temperature and high evaporative demand during the summer in areas like the Mediterranean basin limits grapevine yield and berry development and, consequently, wine quality [2,3].
The grape berry is considered a sink for primary key metabolites and relies on the use of available carbohydrate resources produced by photosynthesis to support its growth and development. At the harvest, berry size and quality mainly depend on water, sugars (glucose, fructose and sucrose) [4–6], organic acids (mainly malic and tartaric acids) [6,7], amino acids (arginine, proline, glutamic acid, among others) [8,9], phenolic compounds (anthocyanidins and tannins) [10,11] and aroma precursors [12]. The understanding of how and when specific metabolites accumulate and how the metabolism of the fruit of each cultivar responds to the environment is of both scientific and agronomic importance.
Over the last decade, important metabolome studies have been performed to characterize grapes from different Vitis vinifera cultivars, including Corvina, Merlot, Touriga Nacional, Alvarinho and Trincadeira [13–17], to compare grape berry composition at various developmental stages [18] or looking at differences between cultivars and growing seasons [19] or regions [16].
In the present study, we characterized the metabolite profiling of grapes from three Portuguese grapevine varieties—Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto—cultivated in two of the most important Portuguese ampelographic collections: one located in the Controlled Denomination of Origin (DOC) region of Vinho Verde in the northwest of Portugal, where wines are characterized by their freshness due to their natural acidity and are low in alcohol, and another in the central region in the DOC region of Lisboa, which normally produces elegant and aromatic red wines, rich in tannins and capable of ageing for some years in the bottle, and white wines with a fresh and citric character. These two regions were selected because in both germplasm collections, the training system, orientation of the rows, planting layout, vineyard age, yield, as well as climate conditions, including temperature, precipitation and relative humidity, are well parameterized. The varieties selected are the most used for the production of Vinho Verde. Alvarinho is considered one of the noblest white varieties in Portugal, which produced the first Portuguese mono-varietal wines with intense citrus and tropical flavors and fresh acidity. The classic profile of Arinto tends to be pale wines, aromatic with green tonality and excellent acidity. Padeiro de Basto wines are ruby to garnet-red color with a distinctive aroma and taste, harmonious and flavorful [17]. The unique character of Vinho Verde wines at the world level may result from the terroir and the variety chosen.
More than 200 metabolites were identified by gas chromatography-coupled time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS), 83 of which were unequivocally identified. Free amino acid content in grape tissues from the three cultivars grown in both DOC regions was also determined with an amino acid analyzer. Results showed that the grape variety and DOC region both accounted for the variance in relative abundance of the metabolites in the berry. Alvarinho grapes were rich in sucrose, in malic and tartaric acids and in amino acids, which may account for the typicity of Alvarinho wines produced in northern Portugal in the DOC region of Vinho Verde.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Results

Grapes were harvested at green pea, veraison and mature stages (at 18 °Brix) for metabolome analysis by GC-TOF-MS. A total of 218 metabolites were detected in the grape samples, 83 of which were unequivocally identified, ranging from sugars, organic acids, amino acids and polyols (Table S1). A principal component analysis (PCA) plot readily discriminated the grape varieties, developmental stages and DOC regions. While this analysis showed that the region accounted for a 38.9% of the variance in the relative abundance of the metabolites (Figure 1), the cultivar accounted for 47.5% and 40.7% of variance in the DOC VV (Vinho Verde) and DOC LS (Lisboa), respectively (Figure S1). Important metabolites contributed to the observed dispersion of the samples between regions, including organic acids, such as malic and tartaric acids. Several metabolites present in minor levels, including sorbitol, ribitol, succinic acid and quinic acid in DOC VV, accounted for the variance between cultivars.
In Figure 2, the heatmap of metabolite changes in mature grapes associated with the DOC regions is shown. For most metabolites, the trend of variation between growing regions was similar for the three selected cultivars. For instance, sucrose and malic acid decreased in all varieties from DOC VV to the DOC LS.
In general, the pattern of sugar accumulation during ripening did not change between cultivars, from veraison to mature stage. Furthermore, glucose and fructose levels did not show significant variation between regions and cultivars, as mature grapes were sampled at the same °Brix. The most noticeable difference was observed in the levels of sucrose from green pea till mature stage, which were higher in vines of the DOC VV region than of the DOC LS region (Figure 3A,B).
Regarding organic acids, the DOC region also affected the final levels of tartrate and malate in grapes (Figure 4). Statistically significant differences were observed in mature grapes from Alvarinho, where the levels of tartaric and malic acids were two-and 1.5-fold higher in the experimental vineyards of the DOC VV than DOC LS regions, respectively. The Alvarinho cultivar seemed to be particularly rich in malic acid and tartaric acids in both DOC regions (Figure 4A and Table S1). Besides tartaric and malic acids, the present metabolome analysis also detected in all samples minor amounts of other organic acids, including citric, fumaric and succinic. Noticeably, maleic acid was very abundant in all samples and in much higher levels than its trans-isomer, fumaric acid (Table S1).
GC-TOF-MS analysis detected fourteen amino acids in grapes from cultivars of both regions (Table S1). To complement these results, a quantitative approach for all amino acids was performed by an amino acid analyzer system, except for tryptophan, which was quantified by HPLC. The analysis was performed in mature grapes, where nineteen of the twenty free amino acids were detected and quantified. Cysteine was not detected in all samples. The total amino acid content in grapes from each cultivar was as follows (in micrograms per gram dry weight (DW) in the DOC VV and LS regions, respectively): Alvarinho, 4415 and 3056; Arinto, 3769 and 2340; and Padeiro de Basto, 3350 and 1406 (Table 1). Arginine was the most abundant amino acid in grapes from all cultivars and regions, eventually reflecting its role as a precursor of the remaining amino acids. Proline and glutamic acid were also very abundant, with 504 and 502 μg/g DW, respectively, in grape berries from Alvarinho in the DOC VV region (Table 1).
Besides the observed variety-dependent differences, region conditions also affected the content of amino acids. Thus, the concentration of free amino acids is much higher in grapes from vines cultivated in the DOC VV than in the DOC LS region (Figure 5). For instance, the total amino acid content in mature grapes from Padeiro de Basto increased by 2.3-fold from the DOC LS to the DOC VV region.
Although GC-TOF-MS is more suitable for primary metabolites analysis, some secondary metabolites, including well-known hydroxycinnamates and flavan-3-ols, were also detected (Table S1). As shown in Figure 6A, the levels of benzoic acid in grapes at the mature stage from Alvarinho and Arinto cultivars were 5.7-and 3.7-fold higher in the DOC LS region than in the DOC VV region. The pattern of benzoic acid accumulation/degradation in developing grapes from Alvarinho in both regions is shown in Figure 6B. The growing region also affected the levels of catechin and epicatechin in grapes. In Alvarinho, catechins increased 1.5-fold from the DOC LS region to the DOC VV region, while epicatechins increased two-fold (Figure 6A).
Total phenolics were measured by the classic Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method. Mature grapes from Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV region accumulated more phenolics than those from the same cultivars grown in the DOC LS region, by 92% and 47%, respectively (Figure 7A). However, in grapes from the Alvarinho cultivar, total phenolics decreased from the DOC VV region to the DOC LS region, although not significantly. When expressed by dry biomass, a consistent decrease in total phenolics from the green pea to mature stage was observed in all varieties and regions, as shown in Figure 7B, for the Alvarinho cultivar. Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) catalyzes the oxidation of trans-cinnamic acid to 4-hydroxy-cinnamate, fueling the production of several secondary metabolites [20,21]. As shown in Figure 7C, the activity of C4H was higher in grapes of the DOC VV region than the DOC LS region for all cultivars, and in each cultivar, including Alvarinho (Figure 7D), a slight decrease was observed from the green pea to mature stage in both regions.

2.2. Discussion

Among the major factors influencing wine character and quality, the grape variety might be the most important one, followed by climate, then landscape and soil [1]. In the present study, principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the DOC region accounted for a 38.9% variance in the relative abundance of the metabolites in the grapes, and cultivar-dependent variations accounted for 47.5% and for 40.7% of the variance in the DOC VV and DOC LS region, respectively. Significant variance between shaded and exposed berries of the same cultivar were also previously observed [15], and clear differences were found between red (Trincadeira, Aragonês, Touriga Nacional) and white (Alvarinho, Arinto) grape samples [8].
Sugar concentration in the berry is dependent on developmental stage [22], environment and viticultural practices [23–25], as well as on the genotype [26–28]. In contrast, sugar concentration has been considered a relatively stable trait for a given cultivar [29]. In our study, several sugars were detected in grapes from all cultivars and sampling places, including the most important ones, glucose, fructose and sucrose, in addition to many others present in much lower levels, including rhamnose, levanbiose and inulotriose (Table 1). The amounts of glucose and fructose, which did not show significant variation between cultivars and regions, could substantially change if different criteria were used to set the maturity. However, at 18 °Brix, the observed decrease in sucrose levels in grapes of the DOC VV to the DOC LS regions was very consistent for all varieties and contributed to some extent to the observed variance between regions. This reduction in sucrose amount might be associated with the stimulation of invertase activity in the warmer region, because slightly higher levels of glucose and fructose were accumulated in the DOC LS than in DOC VV region. In agreement, high invertase activity was observed under heat stress in young tomato fruit [30]. It was shown that water deficit impact on sugar content in grapes is cultivar-dependent [31]. Thus, no significant changes were observed in Merlot sugar content under water deficit, while a significant increase in sugar content was observed in Cabernet Sauvignon berries [10,32]. Similarly, an increase in berry sugar content under water deficit was observed in Cabernet Sauvignon, but not in Chardonnay [33].
More than 20 organic acids have been identified in the grape berry, but tartaric and malic acids are by far the most abundant [34,35]. In the present study, besides the more abundant malic and tartaric acids, other organic acids, including citric acid, stearic acid and maleic acid, were also found. It has been described that organic acids in the berry are responsive to environmental conditions and viticulture practices [23,29], and important studies have been dedicated to the effects of the heat and light that reaches the berry on acid composition [15,36,37]. The observed higher amounts of malic and tartaric acids in Alvarinho and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV region could explain at least part of the acidic character and freshness of “vinho verde”. In this regard, organic acids contributed more to the variance between regions than between cultivars. It has been shown that elevated temperature decreases the concentration of malic acid, whereas grapevines grown in cool climates show higher amounts of malic acids [15,29,38], which is in agreement with the data of the present study. However, according to Salazar-Parra et al. [39], tartaric acid concentration is not significantly affected by temperature or water stress, but in Alvarinho and Padeiro de Basto, higher amounts of tartaric acid were observed in grapes of the DOC VV than of the DOC LS region. It is accepted that after veraison, tartaric acid levels in the fruit decrease, due to a dilution effect, as the volume of the fruit increases, but a strong decrease in tartaric acid per dry weight of the berry was observed here, suggesting that this acid is catabolized during ripening.
Grapevines are able to absorb both NO3− and NH4+ ions from the soil. The reduction of NO3− is started by nitrate reductase, forming NO2−, which is then reduced to NH4+ by nitrite reductase in the chloroplast. Besides other fates, one of the main roles of NH4+ is incorporation into amino acids. Total amino acid content is known to change between cultivars and according to microclimate conditions in response to sun exposure, but also to other causes, such as vine nutrition, vineyard management, soil type, soil moisture content, vine virus status, grape maturity and growing season [15,40–42]. GC-TOF-MS qualitative analysis (Table S1) detected only fourteen amino acids in all grape berry samples, but the quantitative approach performed with an amino acid analyzer and HPLC provided information about all twenty free amino acids in the mature grapes. In agreement with the literature [8,43–45], arginine and proline were the two most abundant amino acids in the grapes, together with glutamic acid. Proline may contribute to a sweet taste in the berry, but it can also act as an energy source, as an antioxidant and as an osmoprotectant [10,46,47]. Furthermore, total amino acid levels may have a strong impact on the secondary aromas of the wine [48]. In the present study, it was shown that Alvarinho is the cultivar with the highest content in total amino acid content in both regions, but the profile of amino acid accumulation did not change dramatically from one variety to the other. However, amino acids are consistently much less abundant in the DOC LS than in the DOC VV region, supporting that grape amino acid content is very much dependent on the terroir.
Although GC-TOF-MS and the extraction method used are more appropriate for detection of primary metabolites, some useful information on secondary metabolites was also provided by this technique. In particular, the levels of benzoic acid, catechins and epicatechin in mature grapes were found to be consistently affected by the growing region, although differences between cultivars were also noticed. In this regard, benzoic acid was much more abundant in grapes from Alvarinho and Arinto cultivated in the DOC LS than in the DOC VV region. Benzoic acid is the precursor of several common hydroxybenzoic acids, usually found in wine, such as gallic acid, gentisic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid (3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid), syringic acid, salicylic acid and vanillic acid [49–51]. It has been suggested that the phenolic content of grape berries is highly variable, and that each phenolic compound concentration may vary independently in response to environmental factors [15,52]. Total phenolics also seemed to follow this trend, because mature grapes from Arinto and Padeiro de Basto sampled in the DOC VV region accumulated more phenolics than those from the DOC LS region, although in Alvarinho, a small decrease from the DOC VV to the DOC LS region was found. In addition, the enzyme, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), which mediates the production of several secondary metabolites [20,21], seemed consistently affected by the terroir, because its activity was higher in grapes from the DOC VV than from the DOC LS region.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Characterization of the Vineyard Regions and Sample Collection

Grapes from three vine cultivars—Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto—were collected in the 2012 season in two different Portuguese ampelographic collections located in the Controlled Appellation (DOC) region of Vinho Verde (DOC VV) in the northwest region of Portugal (Estação Vitivinícola Amândio Galhano, −41°48′ N/8°25′ W) and in the DOC region of Lisboa (DOC LS) in the central region (Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, −39°02′ N/9°11′ W). The soil type in the DOC VV region vineyard is Cambic Umbrisol acidic with low levels of P and K and rich in N, with low mineral colloids and high fertility at the first level [45]. Vines were trained and spur-pruned on an ascendant simple cordon system. The vineyard soil of the DOC LS region is a Calcic Fluvisol with high levels of P and K and poor in N [53]. Vines were trained and spur-pruned on an ascendant bilateral cordon system. Both vineyards were under a non-irrigated regime. The typical yield of each cultivar is as follows (in kilograms per hectare in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions, respectively): Alvarinho, 10,210 and 6000; Arinto, 14,540 and 5000; and Padeiro de Basto, 20,000 and 14,000.
The meteorological and agro-meteorological information collected in the 2012 season by meteorological stations located in both experimental vineyards is shown in Figure 8. The air temperature in both regions was similar, although the index of grown degree-days was higher in the southern region. In the DOC VV region, the precipitation was much higher than in the DOC LS region, and the air relative humidity was also higher.
From each variety, three clusters per vine from three different vines were collected at different phenological stages: green pea, veraison and mature at 18 °Brix. Each sample was stored separately and carried in a thermal luggage. Grapes were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. The powder was stored at −80 °C for posterior use.

3.2. Sample Preparation for Metabolome Analysis

Grape samples were lyophilized for six days, and metabolite extraction from the lyophilized samples and analysis by GC-TOF-MS were carried out at the UC Davis Genome Center Metabolomics Laboratory, as described by Fiehn et al. [54]. The metabolite extraction was performed in methanol, chloroform and water in proportions of 5:2:2. After metabolite extraction and derivatization, samples were injected in split-less mode with a cold injection system (Gerstel, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) and analyzed by GC (Agilent 6890, San Jose, CA, USA) using an Rtx 5Sil MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness) and an integrated guard column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The GC was connected to a Leco Pegasus IV TOF-MS spectrometer (Leco, St. Joseph, MI, USA) controlled with Leco Chroma-TOF software v.2.32 (Leco, St. Joseph, MI, USA). Peak detection and mass spectra deconvolution were performed with Leco Chroma-TOF software v.2.25. GC-MS chromatograms were processed as described by Fiehn et al. [54]. Further analysis after deconvolution was made using the semi-automated workflow of the UC Davis Genome Center Metabolomics Laboratory [55]. Metabolite data were normalized using the dry weight (DW) of the lyophilized samples. Data were transformed in the logarithmic scale of base 2 (log2) and normalization were performed with GeneMaths XT software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was defined according to the standard deviation. Heat maps and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed to discriminate the grape berry metabolite profiles and to compare the alterations in metabolite levels throughout fruit development in different varieties and regions.

3.3. Quantification of Free Amino Acids

Free amino acid content was determined in lyophilized samples of mature grapes. Extraction was performed by adding 25 mL of Milli-Q H2O to 1 g of grape berry powder, and the quantification of natural free amino acids (excluding tryptophan) was assessed in a Biochrom 30 Amino Acid Analyzer with a weak acidic cation exchange resin acting as the stationary phase (200 × 4.6 mm column) and a number of weak acidic Li-citrate buffers acting as the mobile phase. Stepwise pH, temperature and salt concentration gradients were applied. Detection after post column derivatization with Ninhydrin (135 °C ) at 570 or 440 nm was performed (Ansynth Service B.V., Roosendaal, The Netherlands). For tryptophan quantification, the sample solutions were diluted in Milli-Q H2O (1:10), and analysis was performed using a Beckman System Gold HPLC (Beckman, Brea, CA, USA) equipped with an Allsphere C8 column, 250 × 4.6 mm, stationary phase, (P.J. Cobert Associates, Inc. St. Louis, MO, USA) and using a phosphate buffer/MeOH gradient (mobile phase). Detection was performed by fluorometry, with the emission wavelength set at 340 nm and the excitation wavelength set at 280 nm (Ansynth Service B.V., Roosendaal, The Netherlands).

3.4. Total Phenolic Content

Total phenolics were quantified by the Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetry method [56]. Total phenolics from 100 mg of grape berry powder were extracted in 1 mL of methanol (100%). The homogenates were incubated for 15 min in an orbital shaker and then centrifuged at 18,000× g for 20 min. Twenty microliters of supernatant were added to 1.58 mL of deionized water plus 100 μL of Folin reagent, vigorously shaken, and incubated for 5 min in the dark before adding 300 μL of 2 M sodium carbonate. After 2 h of incubation in the dark, the absorbance of the samples was measured at 765 nm. The phenolic concentrations were determined using a gallic acid (GAE) calibration curve.

3.5. Cinnamate 4-Hydroxylase (C4H) Activity

Extraction of total protein from frozen powder was performed as described by Stoop and Pharr [57], with some alterations. Each sample was mixed with the extraction buffer in an approximately 1:1 (w/v) powder:buffer ratio. The protein extraction buffer contained 100 mM 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 1% (w/w) of Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP). The homogenates were then centrifuged at 18,000× g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were kept on ice. The total protein content was determined spectrophotometrically by the Bradford method [58], with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the standard. C4H biochemical activity was assayed at 37 °C, as described by Chen et al. [51], with some modifications. The reaction mixture contained protein extract, 300 mM Bis-Tris propane (pH 8.9), 150 μM NADPH, 1.25 mM glucose 6-Pi and 125 μM of trans-cinnamic acid (different concentrations of trans-cinnamic acid were used for the kinetics studies) in a total volume of 1 mL. The reaction was followed at 340 nm by measuring the rate of NADPH-dependent conversion of trans-cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. All reactions were initiated by the addition of trans-cinnamic acid.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The data presented consists of the results obtained from three independent experiments (samples from each grapevine being one biological replicate) for each variety at each stage and are represented as the mean ± SE. Metabolite levels of samples collected in the DOC VV region were compared with those of samples collected in the DOC LS region by the Student’s t-test using Prism® 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and GeneMaths XT software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). In the figures and tables, the values are marked with asterisks to denote the significance levels between regions: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.

4. Conclusions

The concept of terroir is scientifically vague and has been a topic of intense debate. While it is widely accepted that it involves geography, geology, climate, which interact with plant genetics, human factors, including variety choice, clone and rootstock, organic farming, water management, canopy management, crop load and harvest date/parameters are also important [1]. Furthermore, season-dependent transcriptional changes also account for important biochemical variability in the grape composition [59]. Why one cultivar produces a better vintage in one region than in another is so far not completely understood, nor is what particular metabolites of the grape account for the typicity of the wine. Besides the genotype and environment, other factors shown above, some of which are impossible to control in field experiments, even when vines from experimental vineyards are the targets of the study, might contribute to the chemical diversity of the grapes observed in the present study. Yet, results showed that grape variety and DOC region both affected the chemical composition of the grapes in a specific vintage. At the cultivar level, the observed region-dependent characteristics of Alvarinho grapes, including sugar, organic acid and amino acid contents, may account in some extent for the typicity of Alvarinho wine produced in northwest Portugal in the DOC region of Vinho Verde.

Supplementary Information

ijms-15-04237-s001.pdf

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by European Union Funds (FEDER/COMPETE-Operational Competitiveness Programme) and by the Portuguese national funds (FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) under the project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-022692, the research project FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-008760 (ref. FCT PTDC/AGR-ALI/100636/2008), and the PhD grants, no. SFRH/BD/64587/2009 to VM and SFRH/BD/74257/2010 to HN This work also benefited from the networking activities within the European project, INNOVINE (ref. 311775), and the European COST action (FA1106 “QualityFruit” and FA1003 “East-West Collaboration for Grapevine Diversity Exploration and Mobilization of Adaptive Traits for Breeding”).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  • Author ContributionsA.T., E.-D.J. and H.G. raised the hypothesis underlying this work designed the experiments. A.T., V.M. and H.N. carried out the experiments. A.T. and V.M. performed data processing and statistical analysis and designed the figures and tables. A.T. and H.G. wrote the article. H.G. directed the study. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

References

  1. White, M.A.; Whalen, P.; Jones, G.V. Land and wine. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 82–84. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaves, M.M.; Santos, T.P.; Souza, C.R.; Ortuño, M.F.; Rodrigues, M.L.; Lopes, C.M.; Maroco, J.P.; Pereira, J.S. Deficit irrigation in grapevine improves water-use efficiency while controlling vigour and production quality. Ann. Appl. Biol 2007, 150, 237–252. [Google Scholar]
  3. Costa, J.M.; Ortuño, M.F.; Chaves, M.M. Deficit irrigation as strategy to save water: Physiology and potential application to horticulture. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 1421–1434. [Google Scholar]
  4. Coombe, B.G.; Bovio, M.; Schneider, A. Solute accumulation by grape pericarp cells V Relationship to berry size and the effects of defoliation. J. Exp. Bot. 1987, 38, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar]
  5. Agasse, A.; Vignault, C.; Kappel, C.; Gerós, H.; Delrot, S. Sugar Transport and Sensing in Grape. In Grapevine Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A., Ed.; Springer Nertherlands: Dordrecht, The Nertherlands, 2009; pp. 105–139. [Google Scholar]
  6. Conde, C.; Silva, P.; Fontes, N.; Dias, A.C.P.; Tavares, R.M.; Sousa, M.J.; Agasse, A.; Delrot, S.; Gerós, H. Biochemical changes throughout grape berry development and fruit and wine quality. Food 2007, 1, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kliewer, W.M. Sugars and organic acids of Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. 1966, 41, 923–931. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, Z.; Ough, C.S. Amino acid profiles of commercial grape juices and wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1991, 42, 261–267. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hernández-Orte, P.; Guitart, A.; Cacho, J. Changes in the concentration of amino acids during the ripening of Vitis vinifera Tempranillo variety from the Denomination d’Origine Somontano (Spain). Am. J. Enol. Vitic 1999, 50, 144–154. [Google Scholar]
  10. Castellarin, S.D.; Pfeiffer, A.; Sivilotti, P.; Degan, M.; Peterlunger, E.; di Gaspero, G. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in ripening fruits of grapevine under seasonal water deficit. Plant. Cell Environ 2007, 30, 1381–1399. [Google Scholar]
  11. Castellarin, S.D.; Bavaresco, L.; Falginella, L.; Gonçalves, M.I.V.Z.; di Gaspero, G.; Gerós, H.; Chaves, M.-M.; Delrot, S. Phenolics in Grape Berry and Key Antioxidants. In The Biochemistry of the Grape Berry; Bentham Science: Bussum, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 89–110. [Google Scholar]
  12. Darriet, P.; Thibon, C.; Dubourdieu, D.; Gerós, H.; Chaves, M.-M.; Delrot, S. Aroma and Aroma Precursors in Grape Berry. In The Biochemistry of the Grape Berry; Bentham Science: Bussum, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 111–136. [Google Scholar]
  13. Krishnan, P.; Kruger, N.J.; Ratcliffe, R.G. Metabolite fingerprinting and profiling in plants using NMR. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 255–265. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pereira, G.; Gaudillere, J.P.; Vanleeuwen, C.; Hilbert, G.; Lavialle, O.; Maucourt, M.; Deborde, C.; Moing, A.; Rolin, D. 1H NMR and chemometrics to characterize mature grape berries in four wine-growing areas in Bordeaux-France. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 6382–6389. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pereira, G.E.; Gaudillere, J.P.; Pieri, P.; Hilbert, G.; Maucourt, M.; Deborde, C.; Moing, A.; Rolin, D. Microclimate influence on mineral and metabolic profiles of grape berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 6765–6775. [Google Scholar]
  16. Son, H.-S.; Hwang, G.-S.; Ki, M.K.; Ahn, H.-J.; Park, W.-M.; van den Berg, F.; Hong, Y.-S.; Lee, C.-H. Metabolomic studies on geographical grapes and their wines using 1H NMR analysis coupled with multivariate statistics. J. Agric. Food Chem 2009, 57, 1481–1490. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ali, K.; Maltese, F.; Fortes, A.M.; Pais, M.S.; Choi, Y.H.; Verpoorte, R. Monitoring biochemical changes during grape berry development in Portuguese cultivars by NMR spectroscopy. Food Chem 2011, 124, 1760–1769. [Google Scholar]
  18. Toffali, K.; Zamboni, A.; Anesi, A.; Stocchero, M.; Pezzotti, M.; Levi, M.; Guzzo, F. Novel aspects of grape berry ripening and post-harvest withering revealed by untargeted LC-ESI-MS metabolomics analysis. Metabolomics 2011, 7, 424–436. [Google Scholar]
  19. Liang, Z.; Owens, C.L.; Zhong, G.Y.; Cheng, L. Polyphenolic profiles detected in the ripe berries of Vitis vinifera germplasm. Food Chem. 2011, 129, 940–950. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hrazdina, G.; Parsons, G.F.; Mattick, L.R. Physiological and biochemical events during development and maturation of grape berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 1984, 35, 220–227. [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, J.Y.; Wen, P.F.; Kong, W.F.; Pan, Q.H.; Wan, S.B.; Huang, W.D. Changes and subcellular localizations of the enzymes involved in phenylpropanoid metabolism during grape berry development. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 115–127. [Google Scholar]
  22. Coombe, B.G. Research on development and ripening of the grape berry. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1992, 43, 101–110. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jackson, D.; Lombard, P. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality—A review. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 1993, 44, 409–430. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kliewer, W.M.; Dokoozlian, N.K. Leaf area/crop weight ratios of grapevines: Influence on fruit composition and wine quality. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 2005, 56, 170–181. [Google Scholar]
  25. Clingeleffer, P.R. Plant management research: Status and what it can offer to address challenges and limitations. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res 2010, 16, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shiraishi, M. Comparison in changes in sugars organic acids and amino acids during berry ripening of sucrose- and hexose-accumulating grape cultivars. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci 2000, 69, 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu, H.F.; Wu, B.H.; Fan, P.G.; Xu, H.Y.; Li, S.H. Inheritance of sugars and acids in beries of grape (Vitis vinifera L). Euphytica 2006, 153, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shiraishi, M.; Fujishima, H.; Chijiwa, H. Evaluation of table grape genetic resources for sugar organic acid and amino acid composition of berries. Euphytica 2010, 174, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keller, M.; Mills, L.J.; Wample, R.L.; Spayd, S.E. Bunch thinning effects on three deficit-irrigated Vitis vinifera cultivars. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 2005, 56, 91–103. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, Z.; Palmer, W.M.; Martin, A.P.; Wang, R.; Rainsford, F.; Jin, Y.; John, W.; Patrick, J.W.; Yang, Y.; Ruan, Y.L. High invertase activity in tomato reproductive organs correlates with enhanced sucrose import into and heat tolerance of young fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar]
  31. Gaudillère, J.P.; van-Leeuwen, C.; Ollat, N. Carbon isotope composition of sugars in grapevine an integrated indicator of vineyard water status. J. Exp. Bot 2002, 53, 757–763. [Google Scholar]
  32. Castellarin, S.D.; Matthews, M.A.; di Gaspero, G.; Gambetta, G.A. Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries. Planta 2007, 227, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  33. Deluc, L.G.; Quilici, D.R.; Decendit, A.; Grimplet, J.; Wheatley, M.D.; Schlauch, K.A.; Mérillon, J.M.; Cushman, J.C.; Cramer, G.R. Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 212. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruffner, H.P. Metabolism of tartaric and malic acids in Vitis: A review—Part B. Vitis 1982, 21, 346–358. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruffner, H.P. Metabolism of tartaric and malic acids in Vitis: A review—Part A. Vitis 1982, 21, 247–259. [Google Scholar]
  36. Spayd, S.; Tarara, J. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv Merlot berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 2002, 3, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sweetman, C.; Deluc, L.G.; Cramer, G.R.; Ford, C.M.; Soole, K.L. Regulation of malate metabolism in grape berry and other developing fruits. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1329–1344. [Google Scholar]
  38. Koundouras, S.; Marinos, V.; Gkoulioti, A.; Kotseridis, Y.; van Leeuwen, C. Influence of vineyard location and vine water status on fruit maturation of nonirrigated cv Agiorgitiko (Vitis vinifera L) Effects on wine phenolic and aroma components. J. Agric. Food Chem 2006, 54, 5077–5086. [Google Scholar]
  39. Salazar-Parra, C.; Aguirreolea, J.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Morales, F. Effects of climate change scenarios on Tempranillo grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) ripening: Response to a combination of elevated CO2 and temperature and moderate drought. Plant Soil 2010, 337, 179–191. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kliewer, W.M.; Lider, L.A. Influence of leafroll virus on composition of Burger fruits. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1976, 27, 118–124. [Google Scholar]
  41. Stines, A.P.; Grubb, J.; Gockowiak, H.; Henschke, P.A.; Hoj, P.; van Heeswijck, R. Proline and arginine accumulation in developing berries of Vitis Vinifera L in Australian vineyards: Influence of vine cultivar berry maturity and tissue type. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res 2000, 6, 150–158. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bell, S.; Henschke, P.A. Implication of nitrogen nutrition for grapes fermentation and wine. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res 2005, 11, 242–295. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kliewer, W.M. Free amino acids and other nitrogenous fractions in wine grapes. J. Food Sci 1970, 35, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Huang, Z.; Ough, C.S. Effect of vineyard locations varieties and rootstocks on the juice amino acid composition of several cultivars. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1989, 40, 135–139. [Google Scholar]
  45. Asensio, M.L.; Valdés, E.; Cabello, F. Characterisation of some Spanish white grapevine cultivars by morphology and amino acid analysis. Sci. Hortic 2002, 93, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  46. Coruzzi, G.; Last, R. Amino Acids. In Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants; Buchanan, B., Gruissem, W., Jones, R., Eds.; American Society of Plant Physiologists: Rockville, MD, USA, 2000; pp. 358–410. [Google Scholar]
  47. Forde, B.G.; Lea, P.J. Glutamate in plants: Metabolism regulation and signalling. J. Exp. Bot 2007, 58, 2339–2358. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hernández-Orte, P.; Cacho, J.F.; Ferreira, V. Relationship between varietal amino acid profile of grapes and wine aromatic composition Experiments with model solutions and chemometric study. J. Agric. Food Chem 2002, 50, 2891–2899. [Google Scholar]
  49. Peña-Neira, A.; Hernández, T.; García-Vallejo, C.; Estrella, I.; Suarez, J.A. A survey of phenolic compounds in Spanish wines from different geographical origins. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2000, 210, 445–448. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pozo-Bayón, M.A.; Hernández, M.T.; Martín-Alvarez, P.J.; Polo, M.C. Study of low molecular weight phenolic compounds during the aging of sparkling wines manufactured with red and white grape varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem 2003, 51, 2089–2095. [Google Scholar]
  51. Monagas, M.; Suárez, R.; Gómez-Cordovés, C.; Bartolomé, B. Simultaneous determination of nonanthocyanin phenolic compounds in red wines by HPLC-DAD/ESI-MS. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 2005, 56, 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  52. Haselgrove, L.; Botting, D.; Heeswijck, R.; Hog, P.B.; Dry, P.R.; Ford, C.; Iland, P. Canopy microclimate and berry composition: The effect of bunch exposure on the phenolic composition of Vitis vinifera L cv Shiraz grape berries. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res 2000, 6, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
  53. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. World Soil Resources Reports, No. 103; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2006.
  54. Fiehn, O.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Scholz, M.R.; Kind, T.; Lee, D.Y.; Lu, Y.; Moon, S.; Nikolau, B. Quality control for plant metabolomics: Reporting MSI-complian studies. Plant J. 2008, 53, 691–704. [Google Scholar]
  55. Fiehn, O.; Wohlgemuth, G.; Scholz, M.R. Setup and annotation ofmetabolomic experiments by integrating biological and mass spectrometric metadata. Data Integrat. Life Sci. Proc 2005, 3615, 224–239. [Google Scholar]
  56. Waterhouse, A. Determination of total phenolics. Curr. Protoc. Food Anal. Chem 2002, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stoop, J.M.H.; Pharr, D.M. Effect of different carbon sources on relative growth rate internal carbohydrates and mannitol 1-oxidoreductase activity in celery suspension cultures. Plant Physiol 1993, 103, 1001–1008. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar]
  59. Santo, S.D.; Tornielli, G.B.; Zenoni, S.; Fasoli, M.; Farina, L.; Anesi, A.; Guzzo, F.; Delledonne, M.; Pezzotti, M. The plasticity of the grapevine berry transcriptome. Genome Biol. 2013, 14, R54. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 15 04237f1 1024
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of Alvarinho (AL), Arinto (AR) and Padeiro de Basto (PB) metabolites in grape berries from the DOC VV (Vinho Verde) and DOC LS (Lisboa) regions performed by gas chromatography-coupled time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS). Each color represents a developmental stage (GRE, green pea; VER, veraison; MAT, mature), cultivar and region.
Figure 1. Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of Alvarinho (AL), Arinto (AR) and Padeiro de Basto (PB) metabolites in grape berries from the DOC VV (Vinho Verde) and DOC LS (Lisboa) regions performed by gas chromatography-coupled time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC-TOF-MS). Each color represents a developmental stage (GRE, green pea; VER, veraison; MAT, mature), cultivar and region.
Ijms 15 04237f1
Ijms 15 04237f2 1024
Figure 2. The heatmap of metabolite changes in mature grape berries from Alvarinho (AL), Arinto (AR) and Padeiro de Basto (PB) varieties cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values were centered and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colors as presented in the color key.
Figure 2. The heatmap of metabolite changes in mature grape berries from Alvarinho (AL), Arinto (AR) and Padeiro de Basto (PB) varieties cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values were centered and scaled in the row direction to form virtual colors as presented in the color key.
Ijms 15 04237f2
Ijms 15 04237f3 1024
Figure 3. Key sugars in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Levels of sucrose, fructose and glucose at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic sucrose levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels as comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 3. Key sugars in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Levels of sucrose, fructose and glucose at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic sucrose levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels as comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Ijms 15 04237f3
Ijms 15 04237f4 1024
Figure 4. Key organic acids in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. The levels of tartaric acid and malic acid at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic tartaric acid levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 4. Key organic acids in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. The levels of tartaric acid and malic acid at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic tartaric acid levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Ijms 15 04237f4
Ijms 15 04237f5 1024
Figure 5. Free amino acid content in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values of 19 amino acid concentrations at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto.
Figure 5. Free amino acid content in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values of 19 amino acid concentrations at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto.
Ijms 15 04237f5
Ijms 15 04237f6 1024
Figure 6. Secondary metabolites in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto from the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. The levels of benzoic acid, catechin and epicatechin at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic benzoic acid levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 6. Secondary metabolites in grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto from the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. The levels of benzoic acid, catechin and epicatechin at the mature stage are the logarithmic transformed fold change (DOC VV/DOC LS) of berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto (A); Logarithmic benzoic acid levels of Alvarinho during grape berry development and ripening (B). Columns represent the means ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001.
Ijms 15 04237f6
Ijms 15 04237f7 1024
Figure 7. Fold difference of total phenolics and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H)-specific activity in mature grapes from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS region (A,C); Total phenolics and 4-hydroxylase (C4H)-specific activity during grape berry development in the Alvarinho variety (B,D). Values are the mean ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 7. Fold difference of total phenolics and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H)-specific activity in mature grapes from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS region (A,C); Total phenolics and 4-hydroxylase (C4H)-specific activity during grape berry development in the Alvarinho variety (B,D). Values are the mean ± SE (n = 3); asterisks denote the significance levels comparing DOC VV to DOC LS: * p ≤ 0.05; ** p ≤ 0.01.
Ijms 15 04237f7
Ijms 15 04237f8 1024
Figure 8. Meteorological and agrometeorological elements from the DOC VV and DOC LS regions from the January until October, 2012, season. Maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures and accumulated grown degree days (aGDD) (A); precipitation levels (B); and relative humidity (C).
Figure 8. Meteorological and agrometeorological elements from the DOC VV and DOC LS regions from the January until October, 2012, season. Maximum (Tmax) and minimum (Tmin) temperatures and accumulated grown degree days (aGDD) (A); precipitation levels (B); and relative humidity (C).
Ijms 15 04237f8
Table
Table 1. Amino acid content in mature grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto varieties cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values are expressed as microgram per gram dry weight (DW).
Table 1. Amino acid content in mature grape berries from Alvarinho, Arinto and Padeiro de Basto varieties cultivated in the DOC VV and DOC LS regions. Values are expressed as microgram per gram dry weight (DW).
Amino acids μg/g DWAlvarinhoArintoPadeiro de Basto
DOC VVDOC LSDOC VVDOC LSDOC VVDOC LS
Arg1,2371,0349905791,047324
His7270594313970
Lys212019162016
Asp1877428818016347
Glu502951888945280
Gly181219101012
Ser254161191989764
Tyr1023665495833
Cys
Gln172128319116258105
Thr3282743211778043
Asn309143207642
Phe13611668745331
Leu937449326726
Trp1229014712813256
Pro504365394403300230
Ile644945292115
Met151515151515
Val1249362443631
Ala434259487238326166
Total4,4153,0563,7692,3403,3501,406

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teixeira, A.; Martins, V.; Noronha, H.; Eiras-Dias, J.; Gerós, H. The First Insight into the Metabolite Profiling of Grapes from Three Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars of Two Controlled Appellation (DOC) Regions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4237-4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034237

AMA Style

Teixeira A, Martins V, Noronha H, Eiras-Dias J, Gerós H. The First Insight into the Metabolite Profiling of Grapes from Three Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars of Two Controlled Appellation (DOC) Regions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2014; 15(3):4237-4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teixeira, António, Viviana Martins, Henrique Noronha, José Eiras-Dias, and Hernâni Gerós. 2014. "The First Insight into the Metabolite Profiling of Grapes from Three Vitis vinifera L. Cultivars of Two Controlled Appellation (DOC) Regions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15, no. 3: 4237-4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15034237

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop