Rapid Development of Microsatellite Markers with 454 Pyrosequencing in a Vulnerable Fish, the Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. Pyrosequencing, Repeat Identification and Classification
2.2. Selection and Characterization of the SSR
2.3. Genetic Diversity of Raja pulchra Populations
2.4. Cross-Species Amplification
3. Discussion
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Sample
4.2. DNA Sequencing
4.3. De Novo Assembly and SSR Findings
4.4. PCR and Genotyping
4.5. Statistical Analysis
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgment
References
- Jeong, C.H. A review of taxonomic studies and common names of rajid fishes (Elasmobranchii, Rajidae) from Korea. Koren J. Ichthyol 1999, 11, 198–210. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, Y.; Kim, J.H.; Park, J.Y. Marine Fishes of Korea; Kyo_Hak Publishing: Seoul, Korea, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Ishihara, H. Studies on the Systematics and Resources of the Skates (Rajidae) in the North Pacific Ocean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Yeon, I.J.; Hong, S.H.; Cha, H.K.; Kim, S.T. Feeding habitats of Raja pulchra in the Yellow Sea. Bull. Natl. Fish. Res. Dev. Inst. Korea 1999, 57, 1–11, (In Korean with English abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Antonenko, D.V.S.; Solomatov, F.; Balanov, A.A.; Kim, S.T.; Kalchugin, P.V. Occurrence of Skate Raja pulchra (Rajidae, Rajiformes) in Russian waters of the sea of Japan. J. Ichthyol 2011, 51, 426–431. [Google Scholar]
- Ishihara, H. The Skates and Rays of the Western North Pacific: An Overview of Their Fisheries, Utilisation and Classification. In Elasmobranchs as Living Resources: Advances in Biology, Ecology, Systematic and the Status of Fisheries; Pratt, H.L., Gruber, S.H., Taniuchi, T., Eds.; NOAA Technical Report NMFS 90; U.S. Department of Commerce: Springfield, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Fisheries information service. Ministry for Food, Agriculture; Forestry and Fisheries: Gwacheon, Korea, 2009. Available online: http://www/fips.go.kr accessed on 6 March 2012.
- Ishihara, H.; Wang, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Nakaya, K.; Jeong, C.-H. Raja pulchra. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.2. Available online: http://www.iucnredlist.org accessed on 11 February 2012.
- Chistiakov, D.A.; Hellemans, B.; Volckaert, F.A.M. Microsatellites and their genomic distribution, evolution, function and applications: A review with special reference to fish genetics. Aquaculture 2006, 255, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Jarne, P.; Lagoda, P.J.L. Microsatellites from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol. Evol 1996, 11, 424–429. [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton, M.; Pincus, E.L.; di Fiore, A.; Fleischer, R.C. Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. Biotechniques 1999, 27, 500–507. [Google Scholar]
- Zane, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Patarnello, T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Kircher, M.; Kelso, J. High-throughput DNA sequencing-concepts and limitations. BioEssays 2010, 32, 524–536. [Google Scholar]
- Scaglione, D.; Acquadro, A.; Portis, E.; Taylor, C.A.; Lanteri, S.; Knapp, S.J. Ontology and diversity of transcript-associated microsatellites mined from a globe artichoke EST database. BMC Genomics 2009, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Abdelkrim, J.; Robertson, B.C.; Stanton, J.-A.L.; Gemmell, N.J. Fast, cost effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. Biol. Tech 2009, 46, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.N.; Won, C.; Jun, J.; Lim, Y.W.; Kwak, M. Fast and cost-effective mining of microsatellite markers using NGS technology: An example of a Korean Water Deer Hydropotes Inermis Argyropus. PLoS One 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setsuko, S.; Uchiyama, K.; Sugai, K.; Yoshimaru, H. Rapid development of microsatellite markers for Pandanus boninensis (Pandanaceae) by pyrosequencing technology. Am. J. Bot 2012, 99, e33–e37. [Google Scholar]
- McEwen, J.R.; Vamosi, J.C.; Rogers, S.M. Rapid isolation and cross-amplification of microsatellite markers in Plectritis congesta (Valerianaceae) with 454 sequencing. Am. J. Bot 2011, 98, e369–e371. [Google Scholar]
- Perry, J.C.; Rowe, L. Rapid microsatellite development for water striders by next-generation sequencing. J. Hered 2010, 102, 125–129. [Google Scholar]
- Castoe, T.A.; Poole, A.W.; Gu, W.; de Konig, A.P.J.; Daza, J.M.; Smith, E.N.; Pollock, D.D. Rapid identification of thousands of copperhead snake microsatellite loci from modest amounts of 454 shotgun genome sequence. Mol. Ecol. Resour 2010, 10, 341–347. [Google Scholar]
- Saarinen, E.V.; Austin, J.D. When technology meets conservation: Increased microsatellite marker production using 454 genome sequencing on the endangered Okaloosa Darter (Etheostoma okaloosae). J. Hered 2010, 101, 784–788. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, Y.; Tong, J.; Peng, Z. Microsatellite development for an endangered bream Megalobrama Pellegrini (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) using 454 sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2012, 13, 3009–3021. [Google Scholar]
- Greenley, A.P.; Muguia-Vega, A.; Saenz-Arroyo, A.; Micheli, F. New tetranucleotide microsatellite loci in pink abalone (Haliotis corrugata) isolated via 454 pyrosequencing. Conserv. Genet. Resour 2012, 4, 265–268. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, M.G.; Fitch, A.J.; Bertozzi, T.; Lowe, A.J. Rise of the machines—Recommendations for ecologists when using next generation sequencing for microsatellite development. Mol. Ecol. Resour 2011, 11, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar]
- Guichoux, E.; Lagache, L.; Wagner, S.; Chaumeil, P.; Léger, P.; Lepais, O.; Lepoittevin, C.; Malausa, T.; Revardel, E.; Salin, F.; et al. Current trends in microsatellite genotyping. Mol. Ecol. Resour 2011, 211, 591–611. [Google Scholar]
- Zane, L.; Bargelloni, L.; Patarnello, T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol 2002, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Csencsics, D.; Brodbeck, S.; Holderegger, R. Cost-effective, species-specific microsatellite development for the endangered Dwarf Bulrush (Typha minima) using next-generation sequencing technology. J. Hered 2010, 101, 789–793. [Google Scholar]
- Malausa, T.; Gilles, A.; Meglécz, E.; Blanquart, H.; Duthoy, S.; Costedoat, C.; Dubut, V.; Pech, N.; Castagnone-Sereno, P.; Délye, C.; et al. High-throughput microsatellite isolation through 454 GS-FLX Titanium pyrosequencing of enriched DNA libraries. Mol. Ecol. Resour 2011, 11, 638–644. [Google Scholar]
- Carvalho, D.C.; Beheregaray, L.B. Rapid development of microsatellites for the endangered Neotropical catfish Conorhynchus conirostris using a modest amount of 454 shot-gun pyrosequencing. Conserv. Genet. Resour 2011, 3, 373–375. [Google Scholar]
- Zalapa, J.E.; Cuevas, H.; Zhu, H.; Steffan, S.; Senalik, D.; Zeldin, E.; McCown, B.; Harbut, R.; Simon, P. Using next-generation sequencing approaches to isolate simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in the plant sciences. Am. J. Bot 2012, 99, 193–208. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman, J.I.; Nichols, H.J. A novel approach for mining polymorphic microsatellite markers. PLoS One 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, A.M.; Sims, D.W.; Cotterell, S.P.; Nagar, A.E.; Ellis, J.R.; Lynghammar, A.; McHugh, M.; Neat, F.C.; Pade, N.G.; Queiroz, N.; et al. Molecular markers reveal spatially segregated cryptic species in a critically endangered fish, the common skate (Dipturus batis). Proc. R. Soc. B 2010, 277, 1497–1503. [Google Scholar]
- Barbará, T.; Palma-Silva, C.; Paggi, G.M.; Bered, F.; Fay, M.F.; Lexer, C. Cross-species transfer of nuclear microsatellite markers: Potential and limitations. Mol. Ecol 2007, 16, 3759–3767. [Google Scholar]
- Olivatti, A.M.; Boni, T.A.; Silva-Júnior, N.J.; Resende, L.V.; Gouveia, F.O.; Telles, M.P. Heterologous amplification and characterization of microsatellite markers in the Neotropical fish Leporinus friderici. Genet. Mol. Res 2011, 10, 1403–1408. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, J.H.; Kim, Y.K.; Park, J.Y.; An, C.M.; Nam, M.M.; Byun, S.G.; Lee, B.I.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, T.J. Microsatellite analysis as a tool for discriminating an interfamily hybrid between olive flounder and starry flounder. Genet. Mol. Res 2011, 10, 2786–2794. [Google Scholar]
- Delmas, C.E.; Lhuillier, E.; Pornon, A.; Escaravage, N. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Rhododendron ferrugineum (Ericaceae) using pyrosequencing technology. Am. J. Bot 2011, 98, e120–e122. [Google Scholar]
- Rozen, S.; Skaletsky, H.J. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology; Krawets, S., Misener, S., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 365–386. [Google Scholar]
- Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). Available online: http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast assessed on 9 October 2011.
- Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010, 10, 564–567. [Google Scholar]
- Raymond, M.; Rousset, F. Genepop (version 1.2), population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J. Hered 1995, 86, 248–249. [Google Scholar]
- Van Oosterhout, C.; Hutchinson, W.F. Micro-checker: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2004, 4, 535–538. [Google Scholar]
- Goudet, J. FSTAT (version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered 1995, 86, 485–486. [Google Scholar]
| Primary sequence data | No. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total number of reads | 453,549 | ||
| Total number of bases | 221,052,902 | ||
| Number of contigs | 4,305 | ||
| Number of bases | 2,024,317 | ||
| Number of Singleton | 307,931 | ||
| Total number of reads after trimmed | 288,854 | ||
| Total number of read-length after trimmed | 148,321,261 | ||
| Di-nucleotide | No. | Di-nucleotide | No. |
| AT | 4,164 | CA | 6,544 |
| CT | 6,239 | GC | 86 |
| Tri-nucleotide | No. | Tri-nucleotide | No. |
| AAA | 8 | TAC | 8 |
| AAT | 273 | TTG | 124 |
| AAG | 164 | TTC | 102 |
| AAC | 62 | TGA | 65 |
| ATA | 238 | TGG | 124 |
| ATG | 53 | TGC | 104 |
| ATC | 89 | TCG | 3 |
| AGA | 85 | TCC | 134 |
| AGT | 10 | GAG | 117 |
| AGG | 98 | GAC | 6 |
| AGC | 82 | GTG | 54 |
| ACA | 56 | GGG | 10 |
| ACG | 2 | GGC | 32 |
| ACC | 90 | GCG | 26 |
| TAA | 261 | CAG | 103 |
| TAG | 14 | CGG | 28 |
| Locus | Primer Sequence (5′→3′) | Motif | AT | Allele Size | No. of Allele | GenBank Accession No. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rp03-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM ACTGCCTAGGATGATGATGAAG | (AT)13 | 54 | 94–106 | 4 | JQ433555 |
| R | TCTATATCCCTCCACTTCCTTG | ||||||
| Rp11-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM ATACACTCATCACTCACACCCC | (CA)15 | 61 | 108–134 | 10 | JQ433556 |
| R | GTGGGTTAGTGCTCTTGTTCTC | ||||||
| Rp16-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM AGGAAGGCTTCAGCACATAAT | (TG)13 | 54 | 102–108 | 4 | JQ433557 |
| R | CTCATCTGGAAGAGCACACAC | ||||||
| Rp18-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM ATTCCCTGATACAGATGGAGG | (CA)16 | 61 | 113–145 | 9 | JQ433558 |
| R | TAAACTGTTTGCTCCTCTCTCC | ||||||
| Rp19-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM CAGACAATGAAACTCAACAGGA | (AG)12 | 54 | 96 | 1 | JQ433569 |
| R | TCTAACTTCAATTAACCTTCGCA | ||||||
| Rp22-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM ATAGCATGAATACAATCCCAGG | (AG)12 | 54 | 102–108 | 3 | JQ433559 |
| R | GATGATCACTTGGATTCCTGAT | ||||||
| Rp24-nfrdi | F | 6-FAM TGTTCTACAAGACACAAGGCAG | (AG)12 | 54 | 105–107 | 2 | JQ433560 |
| R | ATTCCTCAGCTAACATCTCCAA | ||||||
| Rp27-nfrdi | F | NED CATATTCATCATCAATTAAATCTGTC | (TG)9 | 54 | 224–232 | 3 | JQ433561 |
| R | GCATATCCTTTGTCTGTCCAT | ||||||
| Rp30-nfrdi | F | NED CGTGTATATGTATGTGTGCATGT | (TG)11 | 61 | 216–230 | 7 | JQ433562 |
| R | GCAGAAGCACTACAGAATGTTT | ||||||
| Rp34-nfrdi | F | NED TATGATCCATACAATCGCAAAA | (TG)9 | 54 | 240–250 | 6 | JQ433563 |
| R | CAAATAGCAAACGACCTACACC | ||||||
| Rp35-nfrdi | F | NED CTTACTGGTGAGGAATCTGAGC | (TG)9 | 61 | 226–236 | 5 | JQ433564 |
| R | GCATACACTCCACACACCAC | ||||||
| Rp39-nfrdi | F | HEX GCTTGGTTTTCTGAAATCAGTG | (AT)13 | 61 | 150–166 | 5 | JQ433565 |
| R | ATAAAATTGCAGGGAGAATGC | ||||||
| Rp43-nfrdi | F | HEX CTCCTGCCTTTGCTATGTGT | (TG)15 | 61 | 154–162 | 5 | JQ433566 |
| R | GACTTTTCAGCGACAGTCTTCT | ||||||
| Rp44-nfrdi | F | HEX ACATGGTCACGAGTAGAATGTG | (CA)16 | 54 | 149–161 | 6 | JQ433567 |
| R | TTCAGACCCTATTCAAAATGCT | ||||||
| Rp53-nfrdi | F | HEX GGACGGAATCCTTCTTTAAACT | (AG)15 | 54 | 140–148 | 5 | JQ433568 |
| R | CTTTGTGCCTCTTTGTTAAACC | ||||||
| Population | Microsatellite Loci | Mean of All Loci. | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rp3 § | Rp11 § | Rp16 | Rp18 § | Rp22 | Rp24 | Rp27 | Rp30 | Rp34 | Rp35 | Rp39 | Rp43 § | Rp44 | Rp53 | |||
| DC | N | 28 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 29.8 |
| Na | 3 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4.7 | |
| AR | 3.00 | 6.64 | 3.83 | 6.78 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.83 | 5.80 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.97 | 5.64 | 5.00 | 4.61 | |
| R | 94–106 | 108–134 | 102–108 | 113–145 | 102–108 | 105–107 | 224–232 | 216–228 | 240–250 | 226–236 | 150–162 | 154–162 | 149–161 | 140–148 | ||
| Ho | 0.393 | 0.400 | 0.567 | 0.433 | 0.600 | 0.567 | 0.333 | 0.667 | 1.000 | 0.800 | 0.567 | 0.276 | 0.433 | 0.800 | 0.560 | |
| He | 0.511 | 0.690 | 0.584 | 0.676 | 0.671 | 0.503 | 0.288 | 0.666 | 0.788 | 0.773 | 0.657 | 0.477 | 0.443 | 0.769 | 0.607 | |
| FIS | 0.231 | 0.421 | 0.029 | 0.359 | 0.105 | −0.126 | −0.159 | −0.002 | −0.269 | −0.035 | 0.138 | 0.422 | 0.022 | −0.040 | 0.078 | |
| HS | N | 29 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 30 | 29.6 |
| Na | 4 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4.9 | |
| AR | 4.00 | 9.79 | 3.98 | 7.62 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 5.81 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.80 | 4.83 | 4.84 | |
| R | 94–106 | 108–134 | 102–108 | 113–133 | 102–108 | 105–107 | 230–232 | 216–230 | 240–250 | 226–236 | 150–166 | 156–162 | 149–161 | 140–148 | ||
| Ho | 0.276 | 0.800 | 0.700 | 0.567 | 0.667 | 0.367 | 0.400 | 0.700 | 0.567 | 0.867 | 0.467 | 0.240 | 0.633 | 0.833 | 0.577 | |
| He | 0.603 | 0.797 | 0.595 | 0.732 | 0.608 | 0.481 | 0.364 | 0.676 | 0.746 | 0.801 | 0.494 | 0.487 | 0.573 | 0.702 | 0.619 | |
| FIS | 0.542 * | −0.004 | −0.177 | 0.226 | −0.097 | 0.237 | −0.099 | −0.035 | 0.241 | −0.082 | 0.056 | 0.508 * | −0.104 | −0.187 | −0.002 | |
| Mean of All Pops. | N | 28.5 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 27.0 | 30.0 | 30.0 | |
| Na | 3.5 | 8.5 | 4.0 | 7.5 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5.5 | 5.0 | ||
| AR | 3.50 | 8.22 | 3.90 | 7.20 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 2.42 | 5.81 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.48 | 5.22 | 4.92 | ||
| R | 94–106 | 108–134 | 102–108 | 113–145 | 102–108 | 105–107 | 224–232 | 216–230 | 240–250 | 226–236 | 150–166 | 154–162 | 149–161 | 140–148 | ||
| Ho | 0.334 | 0.600 | 0.633 | 0.500 | 0.633 | 0.467 | 0.367 | 0.683 | 0.783 | 0.833 | 0.517 | 0.258 | 0.533 | 0.817 | ||
| He | 0.557 | 0.744 | 0.589 | 0.704 | 0.639 | 0.492 | 0.326 | 0.671 | 0.767 | 0.787 | 0.576 | 0.482 | 0.508 | 0.736 | ||
| FIS | 0.387 | 0.208 | −0.074 | 0.293 | 0.004 | 0.056 | −0.129 | −0.018 | −0.014 | −0.058 | 0.097 | 0.465 | −0.041 | −0.113 | ||
| Species Name | N | Microsatellite DNA Markers | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rp3 | Rp11 | Rp16 | Rp19 | Rp24 | Rp27 | Rp34 | Rp35 | Rp39 | Rp44 | Rp53 | |||
| Rajiformes (Skate) | |||||||||||||
| Rajidae | Raja pulchra | 60 | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ○ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ |
| Okamejei boesemani | 3 | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ○ | ⦾ | ⦾ | X | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | |
| Okamejei kenojei | 2 | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ○ | ○ | X | ○ | ○ | ○ | ○ | ⦾ | |
| Okamejei acutispina | 3 | ○ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ○ | ○ | X | ○ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | ⦾ | |
| Dasyatididae | Dasyatis akajei | 1 | X | ○ | X | ○ | X | X | X | X | X | X | ○ |
| Urolophus aurantiacus | 4 | ⦾ | X | X | ○ | X | X | X | X | X | ○ | X | |
| Carcharhiniformes (Shark) | |||||||||||||
| Scyliorhinidae | Cephaloscylium isabaellum | 2 | ○ | X | ○ | ⦾ | X | X | ○ | ⦾ | X | X | X |
| Scyliorhinus torazame | 1 | ○ | ○ | ○ | X | X | X | X | ○ | X | X | X | |
| Triakidae | Mustelus manazo | 2 | ○ | ○ | ○ | ⦾ | X | X | ○ | ⦾ | X | ○ | X |
| Triakis scyllium | 1 | ○ | X | ○ | ○ | X | X | X | ○ | X | ○ | X | |
© 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
Share and Cite
Kang, J.-H.; Park, J.-Y.; Jo, H.-S. Rapid Development of Microsatellite Markers with 454 Pyrosequencing in a Vulnerable Fish, the Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 7199-7211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067199
Kang J-H, Park J-Y, Jo H-S. Rapid Development of Microsatellite Markers with 454 Pyrosequencing in a Vulnerable Fish, the Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(6):7199-7211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067199
Chicago/Turabian StyleKang, Jung-Ha, Jung-Youn Park, and Hyun-Su Jo. 2012. "Rapid Development of Microsatellite Markers with 454 Pyrosequencing in a Vulnerable Fish, the Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 6: 7199-7211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067199
APA StyleKang, J.-H., Park, J.-Y., & Jo, H.-S. (2012). Rapid Development of Microsatellite Markers with 454 Pyrosequencing in a Vulnerable Fish, the Mottled Skate, Raja pulchra. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 13(6), 7199-7211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067199
