Next Article in Journal
Dipolar Copper(I) Complexes: A Novel Appealing Class of Highly Active Second-Order NLO-Phores
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Recognition of Diaryl Ureas in Their Targeted Proteins—A Data Mining and Quantum Chemical Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of ZnO/r-GO Composite Photocatalyst for Improved Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants

1
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
2
Yangxin County Special Education School, Binzhou 310000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2025, 30(5), 1008; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051008
Submission received: 25 December 2024 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 18 February 2025 / Published: 21 February 2025

Abstract

:
In this work, a simple hydrothermal method was used to prepare a series of ZnO/r-GO (ZGO-x) catalysts. The obtained products were subjected to a series of characterizations, which showed that the zinc oxide particles were deposited onto r-GO and that the crystal structure was not disrupted. In addition, due to the large specific surface area and the good electrical conductivity of r-GO, more photogenerated electrons can be rapidly transferred from ZnO to r-GO to participate in the reaction, thus improving the photocatalytic performance. The degradation rate of the ZGO-3 sample reached 100% for RhB after simulated sunlight irradiation for 150 min, whereas the pure ZnO degraded RhB by about 83% under the same environment. ZGO-3 also showed the best photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange, with 100% degradation in 180 min, whereas pure ZnO degraded only 87.64% of methyl orange under solar irradiation.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the rapid development of industry, the discharge of organic pollutants has been increasing, which has brought great harm to animals, plants, and human society. ZnO nanoparticles have attracted much attention in terms of the photodegradation of organic pollutants due to their excellent photovoltaic properties, good thermal stability, and low cost, etc. [1,2,3,4,5]. However, the photocatalytic activity of ZnO is limited due to the easy complexation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs and the narrow spectral absorption range [6]. Therefore, the inhibition of photogenerated electron–hole pair complexation and enhancement in visible light utilization are the main ways of improving photocatalytic performance [7].
Two-dimensional carbon nanomaterials such as graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) exhibit excellent electrical conductivity, a large surface area, strong light absorption, and efficient electron transfer capabilities, thus garnering a dedicated following in the photocatalysis field [8,9]. Significantly, the surface of r-GO is enriched with a variety of oxygen-containing functional groups, which is conducive to the transfer of electron holes [10,11]. For example, Liu et al. constructed a r-GO/TP-COF heterostructure photocatalyst to improve photocatalytic properties [12]. Therefore, r-GO can be employed as a charge movement accelerator to additionally enhance photocatalytic properties. To date, ZnO/r-GO heterostructure photocatalysts have been constructed using the following three methods: (1) the reduction of graphene on the basis of the structure of ZnO [13], (2) the preparation of ZnO on r-GO [14], and (3) the preparation of ZnO along with graphene reduction [15]. The previous two methods require the optimization of ZnO or GO. Therefore, the preparation of ZnO along with graphene reduction is considered as an effective way to fabricate ZnO/r-GO nanocomposites [16,17,18]. However, the agglomeration of ZnO on r-GO limits the electron mobility of the catalyst during photocatalysis [19]. Therefore, how to evenly distribute ZnO nanoparticles on r-GO has become the focus of current research [20,21].
In this work, different ratios of ZnO nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed on the surface of r-GO to design a ZnO/r-GO heterostructure hydrothermally. The reasons for the improved photocatalytic performance were investigated using ultraviolet–visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis), the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method, photocurrent, and so on. The ZnO/r-GO photocatalyst displays a remarkably raised RhB degradation rate compared to the pure ZnO nanoparticles and possesses good stability in repeated catalytic experiments.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure and Physical Properties

Figure 1 shows the XRD spectra of ZnO, ZGO-2.5, ZGO-3, and ZGO-3.5, which were used to determine the crystalline state of the Zn species in the materials. All the diffraction peaks conform to the standard data for the fibrillated zincite structure (JPCDS 36-1451), which suggest that the presence of r-GO does not lead to the emergence of a new crystalline form of ZnO [22]. Moreover, the typical diffraction peaks of r-GO at 26°(002) and 44.5°(100) are not observed in ZGO-x series catalysts, possibly due to the low r-GO content [23]. In addition, it is noticed that the intensity of the ZnO peaks increase with the increase in ZnO content, but the positions of the diffraction peaks are not shifted and no other characteristic diffraction peaks appear, indicating that the series of ZGO-x catalysts have been successfully prepared by this method.
The micromorphology and variation in ZGO-x series samples were studied by scanning electron microscopy, as shown in Figure 2. The results show that r-GO has a two-dimensional nanosheet structure that is slightly wrinkled at the end and can be judged as having a relatively thin sheet structure [24]. According to the literature, graphene oxide consists of large continuous films with a height of 14 nanometers, which corresponds to 8–10 layers of graphene oxide. Figure 2b shows the SEM images of ZnO, which demonstrate that the prepared ZnO nanoparticles are relatively regular and homogeneous. Firstly, the nanoparticle structure of ZnO and the two-dimensional ultrathin nanosheet structure of r-GO can be clearly observed from the SEM images, and their respective morphologies remain relatively intact, indicating that ZnO and GO are not destroyed. Secondly, as the Zn content increases, the ZnO particles formed on the surface of r-GO become larger (Figure 2c,d). However, an agglomeration phenomenon occurs when excessive ZnO nanoparticles are attached onto r-GO [25]. This phenomenon reduces the light exposure area of the catalyst, which is not conducive to the generation of photogenerated electrons. More importantly, it will affect the photocatalytic cracking performance of the catalyst.
Another main factor that influences the photocatalytic performance of photocatalyst is the specific surface area and pore size distribution of the catalyst [26]. The results of the adsorption–desorption isothermal curves and porous distributions of ZnO and ZGO-3 are shown in Figure 3. All samples exhibit type IV curves, which are in accordance with the results of mesoporous materials. It is also found that the positions of the H3-type rings are at a higher relative pressure (0.8–1.0), indicating the existence of large pores in the materials. This also indicates that the pores in the materials are mainly formed by flakes or particles, which coincide with the structure of r-GO flakes. The specific surface areas and pore volumes of ZnO and ZGO-3 are presented in Table 1. The specific surface area of ZGO-3 is 31.5425 m2/g, which is more than that of ZnO (8.1486 m2/g), resulting in the adsorption capacity of ZGO-3 being stronger than that of ZnO and GO. Therefore, ZGO-3 possesses more reactive sites on its surface in the catalytic reaction [27]. Meanwhile, the pore diameter of ZGO-3 is mainly distributed at about 33 nm (Figure 3b).
Subsequently, to further determine the magnitude of the band gap energy and the light absorption performance of the prepared materials, DRUV-vis spectra (Figure 4) were utilized to check the ZnO and ZGO-3 samples at the ultraviolet band. The figure shows that the absorption edges of ZnO and ZGO-3 are 412.32 nm and 428.52 nm, respectively. The band gap values of ZnO and ZGO-3 are calculated to be 3.172 eV and 2.953 eV by the Kubelka–Munk equation, respectively [28]. The results show that the loading of ZnO on r-GO leads to a significant red-shift phenomenon of the catalyst. This is due to the fact that the loading of ZnO onto the r-GO surface increases the specific surface area of ZGO-3, leading to the creation of more effective absorption sites on the surface. It has been reported that the energy band structure of ZnO/GO heterojunction is similar to the simple superposition of the energy band structures of ZnO and GO. However, in the energy band structure of the ZnO/GO heterojunction, the bottom of the conduction band and the top of the valence band of ZnO are shifted down to a certain extent, and a band gap is created, which results in a high absorption coefficient in the visible range. Similarly, Geng et al. also investigated density functional theory and found that graphene synthesized on bulk ZnO exhibit a significant electronic doping phenomenon and enhancement in the work function. Taken together, this evidence can support the improved photocatalytic performance [29].
To ultimately identify the valence state of the major elements in the sample, we analyzed ZnO and ZGO-3 using the XPS technique. The results of the full survey (Figure 5a) and the fine spectrum of Zn (Figure 5b) are displayed. The surface of ZnO/r-GO composites is mainly composed of C, Zn, and O elements. Moreover, the content of C in ZGO-3 is obviously more than that of the ZnO nanoparticles alone. This may be caused by the fact that a portion of r-GO in the ZGO-3 sample is reduced to r-GO. For the Zn2p spectrum of ZGO-3, the binding energy of Zn2p1/2 and Zn2p3/2 are located at 1044.175 eV and 1019.75 eV, respectively, while the spin–orbit splitting value of these peaks is 23.2 eV, which clearly indicates the presence of Zn2+ in ZnO [30,31,32,33].

2.2. Catalytic Analysis

We simulated the photodegradation of rhodamine B(RhB) to determine the photocatalytic performance of ZGO-x (Figure 6). Prior to photodegradation, we evaluated the photocatalytic performance of the r-GO sample in RhB, which showed weak photocatalytic activity under sunlight. The reaction process of RhB degradation for ZGO-x in a different time course can be discerned. The results show that the photocatalytic activity mainly comes from Zn species. Secondly, under the same conditions, the photocatalytic performance of ZGO-x series catalysts varies with the irradiation time, which should be related to the different physicochemical properties of ZGO-x. It is noteworthy that the photocatalytic activity shows an interesting trend with increasing ZnO loading in r-GO. The catalytic performance increases from ZGO-2.5 to ZGO-3, while the catalytic activity shows a decreasing trend when the ZnO loading is further raised to 3.5%. Among all the samples, the ZGO-3 sample shows the best photocatalytic performance. The degradation of rhodamine B by ZGO-3 reaches 75.2% in the first 30 min, while the degradation of r-GO is only 28.7% and that of ZnO is only 19.8%. When the illumination time is extended to 150 min, the photocatalytic performance of ZGO-3 is the best, which is an almost 100% degradation of RhB. However, ZnO degraded about 83% of RhB, and r-GO degraded about 90% of RhB.
Next, methyl orange was also chosen as the target simulated pollutant, and the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange was conducted using the four samples above. The ZGO-3 sample shows the best photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange under simulated sunlight, with 100% degradation within 180 min, while the pure ZnO only degraded 87.64% of methyl orange under sunlight (Figure 7a). Combined with the previously described characterization, we suggest that ZnO may form a certain degree of agglomeration on the catalyst surface when excessive ZnO particles appear on the catalyst surface. In addition, the excessive introduction of the Zn element in r-GO will obviously damage the porous structure and lead to the degradation of physical structural properties. Additionally, the resulting light-exposed area of the catalyst will be reduced, which is unfavorable for the generation of photogenerated electrons.
The ability to separate electrons (e) and holes (h+) generated by photoexcitation is also a major factor affecting photocatalytic reactions, and a photocurrent test was used to investigate the separation efficiency of the photogenerated electrons and holes of the prepared samples. In the absence of light exposure, no photocurrent is generated, whereas in the presence of light, a transient current is generated. The phenomenon suggests that when a light source irradiates a photocatalyst, directionally moving electrons are generated to form a photocurrent. As shown in Figure 7b, the photocurrent signal of the ZGO-3 sample is the strongest with a maximum of 43.5 μA/cm2 after five light-on/light-off cycles, which is 2.94 times higher than that of ZnO (14.8 μA/cm2). The results clearly indicate that the effective complexation of ZnO with r-GO results in the transfer of photoexcited electrons from ZnO to r-GO, which serves to separate photogenerated electron–hole pairs and improve the photocatalytic performance.
We then assessed for photocatalytic stability by recovering the ZGO-3 catalyst, and the results are shown in Figure 8. Fortunately, the photocatalytic activity is capable of being retained for at least 5 times. Subsequently, the zinc content in the catalyst was measured by ICP. The results show that the zinc content decreases from 3 wt % to 2.8 wt %, which should be the reason for the decrease in c photocatalytic performance after five cycles.
Based on the above material characterization and performance test results, a preliminary mechanism for the enhancement in RhB photodegradation efficiency by ZGO-x is proposed, as shown in Figure 9. When the energy of the incident photon is equal to or larger than the energy gap of the composite material, ZGO-x can capture the photon, and the electrons (e) in the valence band of ZnO will become unstable after absorbing the energy of the photon, and some of the electrons will cross the forbidden band and jump to the r-GO, which will capture the adsorbed oxygen on the surface and reduce it to O2-. At the same time, the same number of holes (h+) are left in the valence band to oxidize the water molecules and OH- ions adsorbed on the surface of ZnO into hydroxyl radicals with stronger activity and oxidizing ability. Ultimately, RhB is oxidized and decomposed into CO2, H2O, and other small molecules. Thanks to the good electrical conductivity of r-GO, these photo-induced electrons can continuously migrate to the r-GO sheet which is in close contact with the ZnO surface, thus realizing the effective separation of photogenerated carriers.

3. Experiment

3.1. Synthesis of r-GO

The r-GO was prepared by the redox method. A total of 1.5 g of graphite powder was mixed with 180 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid and 20 mL of concentrated phosphoric acid and stirred for 5 min. Subsequently, 9 g of potassium permanganate was slowly added, and the water bath was heated up to 35 °C with continued stirring for 60 min. The mixed solution was then heated to 50 °C and stirred for 12 h. After the solution was cooled to room temperature, a certain amount of H2O2 was added until the color of the mixture changed from purple-black to brown-yellow. Finally, the brownish-yellow solution was filtered, washed, and dried.

3.2. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles/r-GO

A total of 62.5 mL of 0.02 mol/L zinc acetate/methanol solution was mixed with r-GO. Subsequently, 1 mL of N,N dimethylamide (DMF) was added and condensed under reflux at 60 °C. The reaction was carried out for 6 h with the addition of 25 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution dropwise. The resulting samples were collected by centrifugation and subsequently washed three times using water and ethanol. The resulted final catalysts with increased Zn content were labeled as ZGO-x (x = 2.5, 3, and 3.5), and their theoretical mass ratios of Zn/r-Go are 2.5:1, 3:1, and 3.5:1 (Figure 10).

3.3. Catalyst Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) in the 10–85° range. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were obtained using a micromeritics ASAP-2460 instrument in static mode, and all samples were degassed at 350 °C for 3 h. The specific surface area was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) equation, and the pore volume and average pore diameter were calculated based on the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a Thermo Fisher Scientific EscaLab 250Xi instrument. The peak positions were corrected by using the containment carbon (C 1s peak = 284.8 eV).

3.4. Catalytic Activity Measurement

The ZGO-x series catalysts were reacted at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C). A total of 25 mg of ZGO-x catalyst was added to 50 mL of aqueous MO solution and adsorbed for 30 min at room temperature and then exposed under a xenon lamp at a light intensity of approximately 413 mW/cm2. A total of 3 mL of supernatant was removed at regular intervals, filtered through a 0.45 mm Millipore filter, and analyzed by a UV-vis spectrophotometer. The working electrode was prepared by dispersing 10 mg of ZGO-x in CH3CH2OH and ultrasounding for 10 min. The slurry was subsequently impregnated onto the surface of a 1 cm × 3 cm fluorotin oxide (FTO) glass substrate, which was allowed to dry overnight at room temperature. The separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs was recorded on a CHI660D electrochemical workstation by using a standard three-electrode system. A saturated sodium sulfate solution was used as an electrolyte, graphite and Ag/AgCl electrodes were used as the counter and reference electrodes, and the sample-derived electrode was used as the working electrode. A 300 W Xe lamp (PLS-SXE300, Perfectlight Corporation, Beijing, China) with 100 mW/cm2 UV-Vis intensity was used as the light source.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we generated ZnO/r-GO composite catalysts by growing ZnO on the r-GO surface via a hydrothermal method. A series of characterizations showed that the composites retained the morphology and crystallinity of the original ZnO and exhibited strong stability and reliability. The ZGO-3 sample presented the highest degradation efficiency for RhB, which was almost 100% degraded after 150 min. The improved catalytic ability of ZnO/r-GO photocatalysts is due to the formation of a tight association between ZnO and r-GO sheets. In addition, the ZnO/rGO composites promote the reduction in the recombination of photogenerated e-h pairs. This study provides new perspectives on the formation of ZnO/r-GO composites for environmental applications.

Author Contributions

Methodology, W.Q.; Investigation, H.Z. and Y.D. (Yuhua Dai); Writing—original draft, Y.D. (Yun Ding); Writing—review & editing, X.H.; Project administration, S.H.; Funding acquisition, Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22272070, 22362027, 22302089), the Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, TIPC, CSA (No. PCOM201906), Jiangxi Province “double thousand plan” project (jxsq2019201007, jxsq2020102027), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20242BAB20183, 20224BAB214032, 20242BAB25240), and the Key R&D Plan Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (No. 20223BBE51006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; Ma, J.; Peng, Y.; Wang, A. A review on bidirectional analogies between the photocatalysis and antibacterial properties of ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 783, 898–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fatima, H.; Azhar, M.; Khiadani, M.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, W.; Su, C.; Shao, Z. Prussian blue-conjugated ZnO nanoparticles for near-infrared light-responsive photocatalysis-ScienceDirect. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 23, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smazna, D.; Shree, S.; Polonskyi, O.; Lamaka, S.; Baum, M.; Zheludkevich, M.; Faupel, F.; Adelung, R.; Mishra, Y.K. Mutual Interplay of ZnO Micro- and Nanowires and Methylene Blue during Cyclic Photocatalysis Process. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nawaz, R.; Ullah, H.; Ghanim, A.A.J.; Irfan, M.; Anjum, M.; Rahman, S.; Ullah, S.; Baki, Z.A.; Oad, V.K. Green Synthesis of ZnO and Black TiO2 Materials and Their Application in Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 36076–36087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Harish, S.; Archana, J.; Sabarinathan, M.; Navaneethan, M.; Nisha, K.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Ikeda, H.; Aswal, D.; Hayakawa, Y. Controlled structural and compositional characteristic of visible light active ZnO/CuO photocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutant. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 418, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ji, X.; Chen, L.; Xu, M.X.; Done, M. Crystal Imperfection Modulation Engineering for Functionalization of Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Radiation Detector. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2018, 4, 1700307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Padmanaban, V.C.; Nandagopal, M.S.G.; Priyadharshini, G.M.; Maheswari, N.; Sree, G.J.; Selvaraju, N. Advanced approach for degradation of recalcitrant by nanophotocatalysis using nanocomposites and their future perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 1591–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, J.; Si, M.; Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, K.; Hao, J.; Wang, H.; Randall, C.A. Altering interfacial properties through the integration of C-60 into ZnO ceramic via cold sintering process. Carbon 2022, 190, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aydogan, S.; Canpolat, N.; Kocyigit, A.; Yilmaz, M. Synergistic enhancement of simazine degradation using ZnO nanosheets and ZnO/GO nanocomposites: A sol-gel synthesis approach. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 25080–25094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhu, M.; Chen, P.; Liu, M. Highly efficient visible-light-driven plasmonic photocatalysts based on graphene oxide-hybridized one-dimensional Ag/AgCl heteroarchitectures. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 21487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. He, H.; Cheng, Y.; Qiu, S.; Sun, L.; Jin, B.; Yuan, X. Construction and mechanistic insights of a novel ZnO functionalized rGO composite for efficient adsorption and reduction of Cr(VI). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 34607–34621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shang, J.; Peng, J.; Zhu, T. Construction of a novel metal-free heterostructure photocatalyst PRGO/TP-COF for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2024, 350, 123937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodwihok, C.; Wongratanaphisan, D.; Ngo, Y.L.T.; Khandelwal, M.; Hur, S.H.; Chung, J.S. Effect of GO Additive in ZnO/rGO Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photosensitivity and Photocatalytic Activity. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Paraschiv, C.; Hristea, G.; Iordoc, M.; Sbarcea, B.-G.; Marinescu, V. Hydrothermal growth of ZnO/GO hybrid as an efficient electrode material for supercapacitor applications. Scr. Mater. 2021, 195, 113708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bharadwaj, P.; Kiran, G.R.; Acharyya, S.G. Remarkable performance of GO/ZnO nanocomposites under optimized parameters for remediation of Cd (II) from water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023, 626, 157238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prabhuraj, T.; Prabhu, S.; Dhandapani, E.; Duraisamy, N. Bifunctional ZnO sphere/r-GO composites for supercapacitor and photocatalytic activity of organic dye degradation. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2021, 120, 108592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kumar, P.; Som, S.; Pandey, M.K.; Das, S.; Chanda, A.; Singh, J. Investigations on optical properties of ZnO decorated graphene oxide (ZnO@GO) and reduced graphene oxide (ZnO@r-GO). J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 744, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jammula, R.K.; Srikanth, V.V.; Hazra, B.K.; Srinath, S. ZnO nanoparticles’ decorated reduced-graphene oxide: Easy synthesis, unique polarization behavior, and ionic conductivity. Mater. Des. 2016, 110, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khan, H. Graphene based semiconductor oxide photocatalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen (H2) production, a review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 84, 356–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, I.D.; Choi, S.J.; Cho, H.J. Graphene-Based Composite Materials for Chemical Sensor Application. In Electrospinning for High Performance Sensors; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  21. Atchudan, R.; Edison, T.N.J.I.; Perumal, S.; Shanmugam, M.; Lee, Y.R. Direct solvothermal synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticle decorated graphene oxide nanocomposite for efficient photodegradation of azodyes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 337, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, W.X.; Lv, M.L.; Cao, F.P.; Fang, Z. Synthesis and characterization of ZnO-GO composites with their piezoelectric catalytic and antibacterial properties. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elumalai, N.; Prabhu, S.; Selvaraj, M.; Silambarasan, A.; Navaneethan, M.; Harish, S.; Ramu, P.; Ramesh, R. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO hexagonal tube/rGO composite on degradation of organic aqueous pollutant and study of charge transport properties. Chemosphere 2021, 291, 132782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zou, Y.; Chang, G.; Chen, S.; Liu, T.; Xia, Y.; Chen, C.; Yang, D. Alginate/r-GO assisted synthesis of ultrathin LiFePO4 nanosheets with oriented (010) facet and ultralow antisite defect. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 351, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dadashov, S.; Demirel, E.; Suvaci, E. Tailoring microstructure of polysulfone membranes via novel hexagonal ZnO particles to achieve improved filtration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2022, 651, 120462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Puneetha, J.; Nagaraju, K.; Rathna, A. Investigation of photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet and its correlation with bandgap in ZnO and ZnO/GO nanohybrid. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 125, 108460. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, X.; Tian, H.; Cui, X.; Zheng, W.; Liu, Y. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of mesoporous Zn(x)Cd(1-x)S/reduced graphene oxide hybrid material and its enhanced photocatalytic activity. Dalton Trans 2014, 43, 12894–12903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ivan, R.; Popescu, C.; Pino, A.P.; Logofatu, C. Carbon–based nanomaterials and ZnO ternary compound layers grown by laser technique for environmental and energy storage applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 509, 145359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. He, H.Y.; Fei, J.; Lu, J. High photocatalytic and photo-Fenton-like activities of ZnO–reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites in the degradation of malachite green in water. Iet Micro Nano Lett. 2015, 10, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mukwevho, N.; Gusain, R.; Kankeu, E.F.; Kumar, N. Removal of naphthalene from simulated wastewater through adsorption-photodegradation by ZnO/Ag/GO nanocomposite. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020, 81, 393–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rani, G.J.; Rajan, M.A.J.; Kumar, G.G. Reduced graphene oxide/ZnFe2O4 nanocomposite as an efficient catalyst for the photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 43, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reza, G.M.; Dinh, C.T.; Béland, F.; Do, T.-O. Nanocomposite heterojunctions as sunlight-driven photocatalysts for hydrogen production from water splitting. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 8187–8208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yang, F.; Gao, S.; Ding, Y.; Tang, S.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Liu, J.; Yang, Z.; Hu, X.; Yuan, A. Excellent porous environmental nanocatalyst: Tactically integrating size-confined highly active MnOx in nanospaces of mesopores enables the promotive catalytic degradation efficiency of organic contaminants. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 19020–19034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of series of ZGO-x catalyst samples.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of series of ZGO-x catalyst samples.
Molecules 30 01008 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of various catalysts: (a) r-GO, (b) ZnO, (c) ZGO-3, (d) ZGO-2.5.
Figure 2. SEM images of various catalysts: (a) r-GO, (b) ZnO, (c) ZGO-3, (d) ZGO-2.5.
Molecules 30 01008 g002
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption analysis (a) and pore diameter distribution (b) of series ZGO-x samples.
Figure 3. N2 adsorption–desorption analysis (a) and pore diameter distribution (b) of series ZGO-x samples.
Molecules 30 01008 g003
Figure 4. Diffuse UV-vis spectra (a) and band gap (b) of ZnO and ZGO-3.
Figure 4. Diffuse UV-vis spectra (a) and band gap (b) of ZnO and ZGO-3.
Molecules 30 01008 g004
Figure 5. XPS spectra of full survey (a) and Zn2p (b).
Figure 5. XPS spectra of full survey (a) and Zn2p (b).
Molecules 30 01008 g005
Figure 6. Catalytic degradation course of rhodamine B using a series of ZGO-x catalyst samples displayed under simulated sunlight.
Figure 6. Catalytic degradation course of rhodamine B using a series of ZGO-x catalyst samples displayed under simulated sunlight.
Molecules 30 01008 g006
Figure 7. Catalytic degradation course of methyl orange using a series of ZGO-x (a); photocurrent test of those involved comparative catalysts (b).
Figure 7. Catalytic degradation course of methyl orange using a series of ZGO-x (a); photocurrent test of those involved comparative catalysts (b).
Molecules 30 01008 g007
Figure 8. The recycling test results of ZGO-3.
Figure 8. The recycling test results of ZGO-3.
Molecules 30 01008 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of a possible RhB photodegradation process over ZGO-x.
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of a possible RhB photodegradation process over ZGO-x.
Molecules 30 01008 g009
Figure 10. Synthesis steps of ZGO-x photocatalyst.
Figure 10. Synthesis steps of ZGO-x photocatalyst.
Molecules 30 01008 g010
Table 1. Physical properties and parameters of ZnO and ZGO-3.
Table 1. Physical properties and parameters of ZnO and ZGO-3.
SamplesSBET/(m2/g)Va/(cm3/g)Band Gap (eV)
ZnO8.14860.0344823.172
ZGO-331.54250.1656172.953
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, Y.; Qin, W.; Zhu, H.; Dai, Y.; Hong, X.; Han, S.; Xie, Y. Construction of ZnO/r-GO Composite Photocatalyst for Improved Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants. Molecules 2025, 30, 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051008

AMA Style

Ding Y, Qin W, Zhu H, Dai Y, Hong X, Han S, Xie Y. Construction of ZnO/r-GO Composite Photocatalyst for Improved Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants. Molecules. 2025; 30(5):1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Yun, Wenzhen Qin, Huihua Zhu, Yuhua Dai, Xiaowei Hong, Suqin Han, and Yu Xie. 2025. "Construction of ZnO/r-GO Composite Photocatalyst for Improved Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants" Molecules 30, no. 5: 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051008

APA Style

Ding, Y., Qin, W., Zhu, H., Dai, Y., Hong, X., Han, S., & Xie, Y. (2025). Construction of ZnO/r-GO Composite Photocatalyst for Improved Photodegradation of Organic Pollutants. Molecules, 30(5), 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30051008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop