Next Article in Journal
Anion-π Type Polymeric Nanoparticle Dispersants for Enhancing the Dispersion Stability of Organic Pigments in Water
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal and Photochemical Reactions of Organosilicon Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Revisiting the Mechanistic Pathway of Gas-Phase Reactions in InN MOVPE Through DFT Calculations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 30
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules30040974
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Puzzle of the Regioselectivity and Molecular Mechanism of the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction Between E-2-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-Nitroethene and Arylonitrile N-Oxides: Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Quantumchemical Study

by
Mikołaj Sadowski
1,
Ewa Dresler
2 and
Radomir Jasiński
1,*
1
Department of Organic Chemistry and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
2
Łukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Heavy Organic Synthesis “Blachownia”, Energetyków 9, 47-225 Kędzierzyn-Koźle, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(4), 974; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040974
Submission received: 7 February 2025 / Revised: 18 February 2025 / Accepted: 18 February 2025 / Published: 19 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum Chemical Calculations of Molecular Reaction Processes)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

The regioselectivity and molecular mechanism of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene and arylonitrile N-oxides were explored on the basis of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) quantumchemical calculations. It was found that the earlier postulate regarding the regioselectivity of the cycloaddition stage should be undermined. Within our research, several aspects of the title reaction were also examined: interactions between reagents, electronic structures of alkenes and nitrile oxides, the nature of transition states, the influence of the polarity solvent on the reaction selectivity and mechanism, substituent effects, etc. The obtained results offer a general conclusion for all of the important aspects of some groups of cycloaddition processes.

1. Introduction

Isoxazoles (1,2-oxazoles) are important heterocyclic compounds characterized by a wide range of potential applications in industry, pharmacy, biotechnology, and other areas [1,2,3,4,5,6]. These types of heterorganic compounds evidently exhibit antibacterial, antibiotic, anticancer, antifungal, and antitumor, among others, bioactivities. In agronomy, analogs of the isoxazole are applied as insecticides, herbicides, and components that stimulated the antiparasitic effect for animals and plants. Additional applications are connected with the possibility of the conversion of the heterocyclic ring to enaminoketones, γ-amino alcohols, α,β-unsaturated oximes, β-hydroxy nitriles, and other compounds [7,8,9,10,11].
The preparation of isoxazole heterocyclic systems is possible via different types of preparative protocols, such as the acylation of oximes [12], the condensation of hydroxylamines with carbonyl compounds [13], or the cyclisation of alkynes functionalized by oxime moiety [14]. The most universal approach is, however, the (3+2) cycloaddition (32CA) reaction with the participation of nitrile N-oxides as three atom components (TACs) [15,16]. It is generally known that the acetylenic components are less reactive in comparison to analogous ethene derivatives [17,18,19]. Therefore, an optimal strategy for the preparation of isoxazoles is 32CA processes between nitrile N-oxides and the further aromatization of primary obtained 2-isoxazolines. This is possible, for example, via an easy dehydronitration scheme [20]. Padwa and coworkers described these types of transformations with the participation of the benzonitrile N-oxide (2a) and E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) [21,22]. In the course of this process, the denitrative aromatization of the primary nitroisoxazoline (4a) is realized spontaneously, yielding 3-phenylisoxazole (3a) as the final product (Scheme 1).
It is interesting that the authors proposed 3-phenyl-4-trimethylsillyl-5-nitroisoxazoline (4a) as the reaction intermediate. The existence of this cycloadduct in the reaction mixture was, however, not confirmed by any method. On the other hand, analogous 32CAs with the participation of other 2-R-nitroethenes are realized with a completely different regioselectivity. For example, the 32CAs between arylonitrile N-oxides and E-3,3,3-trichloro-1-nitroprop-1-ene lead to respective 3-aryl-4-nitro-5-trichloromethyl-2-isoxazolines as single reaction products (Scheme 2) [23]. This is a consequence of the electrophilic activation of the two-position of the nitrovinyl moiety. This effect was very recently observed regarding different 32CAs with the participation of conjugated nitroalkenes [24,25,26,27,28].
So, the real regioselectivity of the title reaction should be a treatment that is unknown at this moment. Additionally, the mechanistic background of this cycloaddition also requires a respective exploration. According to the actual state of knowledge, the earlier theory about the “concerted” nature of 32CA independently of the nature of addends completely failed [29]. At this moment, different types of mechanisms can be considered: non-polar (synchronous, asynchronous, biradical stepwise) or polar (synchronous, asynchronous one-step two-stage, zwitterionic stepwise). For example, via the stepwise zwitterionic mechanism, the (3+2) cycloaddition between trifluroacetonitrile N-oxide and vinylamine is realized (Scheme 3) [30,31].
On the other hand, the (3+2) cycloaddition between acetonitrile N-oxide and tetraaminoethene proceeds according to the stepwise mechanism with the intervention of the biradical intermediate [32] (Scheme 4).
Lastly, in some cases, the formation of acyclic intermediates characterized by “extended” conformation can compete with the formation of (3+2) cycloadducts via the single-step cycloaddition method [33] (Scheme 5).
Due to the issues mentioned above, we performed a comprehensive quantumchemical study in the framework of the Molecular Electron Density Theory approach [34,35,36]. In particular, we decided to (i) analyze the global and local reactivity of the reaction components based on the CDT tools [37,38]; (ii) fully explore both regioisomeric reaction paths (Scheme 6). In the framework of the second area of this research, we analyzed all of the detected critical structures, including the influence of the substituent effect as well as the polarity of the solvent on the reaction course. In addition, at the same level of theory, we examined an analogous reaction with the participation of 1-acetyl-1-trimethylsyllil-ethene (7) because the regioselectivity of this process was confirmed experimentally.

2. Results and Discussion

Electronic Interactions

Substrates 1 and 2a–c were firstly characterized by the CDFT approach [38] substrates, and computations were performed using Gaussian 16 review C.01 at the ωB97XD/6-311G(d) theory level. For the substrates optimized structures, the ELF function was computed using Topmod 09 software and visualized with paraview.
The three atom components (TACs) in the studied reaction are N-nitrile oxides (2a–c), and the alkene component is ethene (1). As an anchor point to compare the silyl analogue, we have also computed all the parameters for (E)-3,3-dimethyl-1-nitrobut-1-ene (6).
The global electrophilicity and nucleophilicity of the substrates are presented in Table 1.
Electrophilicity and nucleophilicity can be qualified according to the electrophilicity–nucleophilicity scale proposed and successfully applied by Domingo et al. [37], where qualification allows for a quick mental assessment of the compounds’ reactivity. The original intervals for each category were proposed for the results obtained via B3LYP/6-31G(d) model. As ωB97XD/6-311G(d) is used, revised numerical values must be used for qualification [39]. The marginal electrophiles have ω < 0.58 eV, moderate electrophiles have ω = (0.58 eV ÷ 0.97 eV), for strong electrophiles ω = (0.97 eV ÷ 2.38 eV), and ω values equal to or greater than 2.38 eV qualify a super electrophilic species. For nucleophilicity, the intervals are weak N < 1.92 eV; moderate N = (1.92 eV ÷ 2.95 eV); strong N = (2.95 eV ÷ 3.97 eV); and super nucleophilic N ≥ 3.97 eV [39]. Thus, 1, 2c, 6 are strong electrophiles, while 2a,b are moderately electrophilic. The alkene compounds 1, 6 are weakly nucleophilic; 2a,c are moderate nucleophiles; and 2b is a strong nucleophile.
According to global electro- and nucleophilicities, in the reactions, ethene 1 will act as the electrophile, while nitrile-N-oxides 2a–c will act as the nucleophiles.
To characterize the reactivity of the substrates further, we computed the electrophilic and nucleophilic Parr functions for all of the substrates and the unsilylated alkene model. As the electronic properties of the compounds 1, 2a–c, and 6 are described at ωB97XD/6-311G(d) for the first time, both the electrophilic (P+k) and nucleophilic (P−k) Parr function values were computed.
The local electrophilicity (ωk) and nucleophilicity (Nk) values for reactive sites, together with the corresponding values of the Parr function, are given in Table 2 and Table 3 below.
There is a small change in the Parr function between 1 and 6. In both compounds, C5 is the more electrophilic center, while in the compounds 2a–c, the more nucleophilic center is the oxygen atom. The most polarized nitrile-N-oxide moiety appears in compound 2b.
To better understand the electronic structure of both compounds, they were characterized by ELF and NPA (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Both alkenes (1, 6) have the same number of disynaptic ELF attractors; the population of the disynaptic C4-C5 basin in 1 is 3.45 e, while in compound 6 it equates to 3.58 e (Figure 1), rendering the bonds virtually the same. There is, however, a strong difference between both 1 and 6 when it comes to the charges of the carbon atom bonded with the XMe3 group (X = Si,C) (Figure 2). The one in the t-Bu analogue has a negligible charge of −0.11 e, while the trimethylsilyl analogue has a negative charge of −0.55 e. Charge differences within the molecules suggest a push–pull effect.
The push–pull effect has a great impact on the reactivity of alkene-type compounds [40]; thus, compound 1 was screened for its effect in hope that the effect will explain the unexpected polarization of the C4-C5 bond in alkene (1), visible in the NPA results, as compared to alkene 6. We have not found reports on the analysis of the push–pull effect via ELF. So, a new method is hereby proposed.
The push–pull effect has two constituents: resonant and inductive [41]. In an alkene push–pull system, the C=C bond changes nature and becomes more reminiscent of a single bond; the stronger the effect, the less π electrons populate the bond [42]. Rattananakin et al. in 2007 [41] proposed three possible resonant structures explaining the push–pull system (Scheme 7).
In our example 1, the electron donating group would be the SiMe3 moiety. Thus, the resonance effect will be nonexistent; only the inductive constituent remains. To quantify the inductive effect of a substituent, the F constant can be used [43].
In Table 4, the populations of the C1-C2 bonding region computed via ELF are given, as well as significant bond lengths.
Taking into consideration that the t-Bu group has a slightly stronger electron donating inductive effect (Ft-Bu = −0.02) than the SiMe3 (FSiMe3 = −0.01) group (FNO2 = 0.65), and that the C-Si bonds are longer than the C-C bonds, we conclude that there is no push–pull effect present neither in alkene 1 nor 6, and that the changes in reactivity, shown in CDFT, most likely stem from geometrical differences between the compounds.
Nucleophilic agents (2a–c) were also studied with ELF and NPA (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The CNO moiety of N-oxides 2a–c shows three slightly underpopulated lone pairs on the oxygen atom (Figure 3) and an underpopulated C-N single bond (NPA analysis shows that there is ionic component to the C-N bonds—Figure 4). Oxides 2a and 2c show a slightly underpopulated C≡N bond, while oxide 2b has the bond fully populated. In all the oxides, disynaptic basin N2,C3 shows rotational symmetry, for which the axis covers a line that stretches through C-N-O. The CNO group is completely linear. The C3-C8 bond is an overpopulated (excess of 0.36–0.49 e) single bond, suggesting that the CNO moiety is somewhat conjugated with the phenyl aromatic system.
The red strip visible on the N2-C3 ELF isovalue surface of N-oxide 2a in Figure 3 is an artifact, resulting from the Topmod symmetry-based computation acceleration, and there is no monosynaptic attractor in the volume between the C3 and N2 atoms.
In the next step of our research, we explored the reaction profiles for both of the possible 32CA channels in the carbon tetrachloride environment used under the experimental condition as solvents. For this purpose, the DFT calculation at the wb97xd/6-311+G(d) (PCM) level of theory was used. Within these considerations, model 32CA of E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) with benzonitrile N-oxide (2a) was analyzed. It was found that the nature of both of the considered profiles is very similar. In particular, independently of the 32CA channel, two critical points were detected and verified between the areas of individual reagents and respective products. The graduate reduction in distance between reaction components leads, in the initial stage, to the formation of a respective pre-reaction complex (MCA for path A and MCB for path B, respectively). This process is barrierless and associated with a reduction in the enthalpy of the reaction system by a few kcal/mol (Table 5). It should be underlined that at the same time, the entropy of the reaction systems is substantially reduced. As a consequence, the Gibbs free energies of the formation of both MCs are positive. This excludes the possibility of the existence of a pre-reaction complex as relative thermodynamic stable intermediates. Within MCs, the substructures of reagents adopt the orientation that determined the further conversion along the respective, regioisomeric reaction channel (Figure 5). So, these intermediates should be treated as orientation complexes [44,45,46,47]. It is important, however, to ensure that no new sigma bonds were not formed at this stage. The key interatomic distances exist in the range of 3–3.7 Å (Table 6) (evidently beyond the area typical for C-C and C-O distances in transition states). In the framework, the electron density transfer between substructures is also not observed (GEDT = 0 e) (Table 6). So, localized intermediates are not charge–transfer complexes [48]. In general, similar types of intermediates were identified experimentally regarding 32CA of ozone with ethene and ethyne [49,50].
The further conversion of the reaction system along the intrinsic reaction coordinate leads to the formation of the transition state independently of the 32CA channel. These are transition states TSA and TSB for channels A and B, respectively. The formation of the transition state is associated with an increase in the enthalpy of the reaction system by 10.4 kcal/mol and 10.8 kcal/mol for TSA and TSB, respectively (Table 5). Including the entropy factor for the calculation of the activation barrier stimulates values of the Gibbs free energy of the activation 24.4–24.8 kcal/mol. So, both theoretically possible 32CA paths are allowed from the kinetic point of view. This undermine the proposed earlier postulate about 3-phenyl-4-trimethylsillyl-5-nitroisoxazoline 4a as the only possible adduct in this cycloaddition reaction.
The localized TS exhibits a nature that is typical for the single-step 32CA with the participation of linear-type TACs [19,51,52,53,54]. Within these transition states, two new sigma bonds are formed. These bonds exhibit, however, a different degree of development. The new bond is always formed slightly faster at the b-carbon atom from the nitrovinyl > C=C(NO2) moiety.
Both optimized transition states exhibit the transfer of the electron density (GEDT) between substructures. Values of the GEDT indices are typical for the polar but one-step 32CAs [55,56,57].
The electronic structure of the TS-s was characterized using NPA and ELF. In the case of NPA (Figure 6 and Figure 7), there was no significant change in the charges between the substrates and TS outside of the reacting site; thus, the phenyl, trimethylsilyl, and nitro groups are not broken down.
In both transition states, the depopulation of the C4=C5 double bond compared to the substrates is visible. Also, the N2 atom accepts one electron pair, changing the C3≡N2 triple bond into a double one. During the process, the CNO moiety loses its linearity (Figure 6). Bonds that will not enter the five-membered ring, when the TS turns into a product, do not change significantly when compared to substrates. There seems to be an electrostatic repulsion between the O1 and C5 atoms, yet the repulsion is stronger in TSB. Considering that in the TSs both C3≡N2 triple bonds and C4=C5 double bonds are depopulating, and that there is a significant difference in electrostatic interactions between the C3-C4 atom pair (attraction) and O1-C5 atom pair (repulsion), we propose that the TSs stand for a single-step asynchronic mechanism.
The IRC calculations confirmed without any doubt that the TSA is a single-transition structure along path A, and similarly, TSB is a single-transition structure along path B. All attempts to optimize the hypothetical zwitterionic intermediates on the basis of the interactions between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a) were not successful. So, the polar but one-step mechanism of model 32CA 1 + 2a is evident in light of this DFT computational study.
In the framework of the extended study, we examined the same reaction in more polar solvents (acetone, nitromethane—ε = 20.493 and ε = 36.562, respectively [58]). It was found that the increase in the polarity of the reaction environment stimulated the increase in the enthalpy of the activation on both of the considered cycloaddition paths. These changes are not, however, spectacular and do not exceed 1.5 kcal/mol. Rather weak is also the solvent effect in the case of the key geometrical parameters of transition states. In particular, the asynchronicity of both TSs is only slightly higher in the nitromethane solution in comparison to the analogous structures in carbon tetrachloride. The respective GEDT values are also very similar.
Next, we analyzed the substituent effect on the reaction course. For this purpose, we examined the analogous cycloaddition reaction with the participation of nitrile oxides functionalized by the amino (s = −0.66 [43]) and nitro (s = 0.78 [43]) groups.
Lastly, we performed the exploration of energy profiles for the analogous reaction with the participation of the 1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-acetylethene (7) (Scheme 8). In this reaction, the primary cycloaddition product was isolated and identified as the 5,5-disubstituted isooxazoline derivative. The same regioselectivity is suggested in our ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) computational study. This conclusion supports that ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) offers the correct view of the selectivity of the title reactions.

3. Computational Details

The DFT computations were performed using the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) level of theory implemented in the Gaussian package [59,60]. The computational PlGrid infrastructure at the polish “Cyfronet” center was utilized. A similar computational level and the methodology have already been successfully applied very recently to explore the mechanistic aspects of various cycloaddition processes [52,61,62,63]. All localized stationary points were verified on the basis of the full vibrational analysis. We found that starting molecules, pre-reaction complexes, and products had positive Hessian matrices. On the other hand, all of the optimized transition states (TSs) exhibited one negative eigenvalue in their Hessian matrices. Next, the IRC (intrinsic reaction coordinate) trajectories computed for all TSs confirmed, without doubt, the postulated nature and role within the energy profile. The presence of solvents (carbon tetrachloride, acetone, nitromethane) in the reaction environment was included using the IEFPCM (Integral Equation Formalism Polarizable Continuum Model) algorithm [64]. Calculations of all critical structures were performed at a temperature of T = 298 K and pressure of p = 1 atm. The results are collected in Table 5 and Table 6.
The global electron density transfer (GEDT) [65] within critical structures was estimated using the following formula:
GEDT = −ΣqA
where qA is the net charge, and the sum is taken over all of the atoms of nitroalkene.
The global and local electronic properties of the reactants were estimated using equations recommended by Parr and Domingo [66,67]. In particular, the electronic chemical potentials (µ) and chemical hardness (η) were evaluated in terms of the one-electron energies of the frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) using the following equations:
μ ≈ (EHOMO + ELUMO)/2  η ≈ ELUMO − EHOMO
It should be mentioned at this point that orbital energies computed at the DFT level have some errors and starting point dependence. For the homogenous series of reagents, these errors are, however, similar and, in general analysis, exhibit a non-important role [68]. The values of µ and η were then used to calculate the global electrophilicity index (ω) using the following formula:
ω = μ2/2η
Global nucleophilicity (N) [69] was expressed using the following equation:
N = EHOMO − EHOMO (tetracyanoethene)
The local electrophilicity (ωk) at atom k was calculated by projecting the index ω onto any reaction center k in the molecule using Parr functions P+k:
ωk = P+k·ω
The local nucleophilicity (Nk) condensed to atom k was calculated using global nucleophilicity N and Parr functions P−k [70] according to the following formula:
Nk = P−k·N
The results are summarized in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

This ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) computational study sheds light on the regioselectivity and molecular mechanism of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene and arylonitrile N-oxides. Our results undermine the proposed earlier postulate about 3-phenyl-4-(trimethylsilyl)-5-nitroisoxazoline 4a as the only possible adduct in this cycloaddition reaction. The obtained parameters of the activation allow for the reaction course to be theoretically possible via both regioisomeric cycloaddition channels. Next, the DFT simulations exclude the possibility of the formation of the zwitterionic intermediate along the reaction course. The electronic nature of both optimized TSs was identified using the ELF technique. Additionally, the role of the global and local polar interactions was described on the basis of the CDFT descriptors. Lastly, the exploration of the solvent and substituent effects show that the proposed mechanism can be treated as general for some cycloaddition groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.J.; methodology, R.J. and M.S.; software, E.D.; validation, E.D.; investigation, M.S., R.J. and E.D.; data curation, E.D.; writing—original draft preparation, R.J. and M.S.; visualization, M.S.; supervision, R.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zawadzińska-Wrochniak, K.; Zavecz, I.; Hirka, S. The recent progress in the field of the applications of isoxazoles and their hydrogenated analogs: Mini review. Sci. Rad. 2024, 3, 228–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Potkin, V.I.; Kolesnik, I.A.; Akishina, E.A.; Zubkov, F.I.; Fedoseeva, M.A.; Pronina, A.A.; Grigoriev, M.S.; Zhou, H.; Kurman, P.V.; Terpinskaya, T.I.; et al. Polysubstituted pyrans, chromenes, and chromenopyridines with isoxazole or isothiazole moiety: Synthesis, structure, and antitumor activity. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2024, 60, 390–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xiao, M.M.; Hua, M.Q.; Mou, F.Y.; Xiong, H.Y. Visible-light-induced Ir-catalyzed site-selective C−H trifluoromethylation of 3-substituted 1,2-benzoxazoles. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2024, 60, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.; Liu, W.; Feng, H. Ring expansion strategy to access functionalized 2-oxazolines (microreview). Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2024, 60, 236–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dresler, E. The Participation of Oleic Acid and its Esters in (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions: A Mini-Review. Sci. Rad. 2024, 3, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ryachi, K.; Barhoumi, A.; Atif, M.; Zeroual, A.; El Idrissi, M.; Tounsi, A. Advanced quantum and docking studies on the (3+2) cycloaddition of nitrile oxide with 1-Methyl-4-(Prop-1-en-2-yl)Cyclohex-1-ene: Exploring mechanisms and ADME properties. Curr. Chem. Lett. 2025, 14, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pinho e Melo, T.M.V.D. Recent Advances on the Synthesis and Reactivity of Isoxazoles. Curr. Org. Chem. 2025, 9, 925–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, F.; Szostak, M. Recent Developments in the Synthesis and Reactivity of Isoxazoles: Metal Catalysis and Beyond. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2015, 357, 2583–2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baraldi, P.G.; Barco, A.; Benetti, S.; Pollini, G.P.; Simoni, D. Synthesis of Natural Products via Isoxazoles. Synthesis 1987, 1987, 857–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bracken, C.; Baumann, M. Development of a Continuous Flow Photoisomerization Reaction Converting Isoxazoles into Diverse Oxazole Products. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 85, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Madhavan, S.; Keshri, S.K.; Kapur, M. Transition Metal-Mediated Functionalization of Isoxazoles: A Review. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2021, 10, 3127–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Barber, G.N.; Olofson, R.A. A Useful, Regiospecific Synthesis of Isoxazoles. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Morita, T.; Yugandar, S.; Fuse, S.; Nakamura, H. Recent progresses in the synthesis of functionalized isoxazoles. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bondarenko, O.B.; Zyk, N.V. The main directions and recent trends in the synthesis and use of isoxazoles. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2020, 56, 694–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jasiński, R. Recent progress in the synthesis of nitroisoxazoles and their hydrogenated analogs via (3+2) cycloaddition reactions (microreview). Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2023, 59, 730–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Łapczuk-Krygier, A.; Kącka-Zych, A.; Kula, K. Recent progress in the field of cycloaddition reactions involving conjugated nitroalkenes. Curr. Chem. Lett. 2019, 8, 13–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Heaney, F. Nitrile Oxide/Alkyne Cycloadditions—A Credible Platform for Synthesis of Bioinspired Molecules by Metal-Free Molecular Clicking. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 2012, 3043–3058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haberhauer, G.; Gleiter, R.; Woitschetzki, S. anti-Diradical Formation in 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions of Nitrile Oxides to Acetylenes. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 12321–12332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dresler, E.; Woliński, P.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. On the Question of Zwitterionic Intermediates in the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions between Aryl Azides and Ethyl Propiolate. Molecules 2023, 28, 8152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Łapczuk-Krygier, A.; Jaśkowska, J.; Jasiński, R. The influence of Lewis acid catalyst on the kinetic and molecular mechanism of nitrous acid elimination from 5-nitro-3-phenyl-4,5-dihydroisoxazole: DFT computational study. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2018, 54, 1172–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Padwa, A.; MacDonald, J.G. 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of benzonitrile oxide with vinylsilanes. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3219–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Padwa, A.; MacDonald, J.G. Utilization of vinylsilanes in [4+2]-cycloaddition reactions. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 3189–3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zawadzińska, K.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Kula, K.; Woliński, P.; Mirosław, B.; Krawczyk, T.; Jasiński, R. The Participation of 3,3,3-Trichloro-1-nitroprop-1-ene in the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction with Selected Nitrile N-Oxides in the Light of the Experimental and MEDT Quantum Chemical Study. Molecules 2021, 26, 6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sadowski, M.; Dresler, E.; Zawadzińska, K.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. Syn-Propanethial S-Oxide as an Available Natural Building Block for the Preparation of Nitro-Functionalized, Sulfur-Containing Five-Membered Heterocycles: An MEDT Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 4892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zawadzińska, K.; Gadocha, Z.; Pabian, K.; Wróblewska, A.; Wielgus, E.; Jasiński, R. The First Examples of (3+2) Cycloadditions with the Participation of (E)-3,3,3-Tribromo-1-Nitroprop-1-Ene. Materials 2022, 15, 7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kula, K.; Łapczuk, A.; Sadowski, M.; Kras, J.; Zawadzińska, K.; Demchuk, O.M.; Gaurav, G.K.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. On the Question of the Formation of Nitro-Functionalized 2,4-Pyrazole Analogs on the Basis of Nitrylimine Molecular Systems and 3,3,3-Trichloro-1-Nitroprop-1-Ene. Molecules 2022, 27, 8409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dresler, E.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. Understanding the Regioselectivity and the Molecular Mechanism of (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions between Nitrous Oxide and Conjugated Nitroalkenes: A DFT Computational Study. Molecules 2022, 27, 8441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sadowski, M.; Kula, K. Unexpected Course of Reaction Between (1E,3E)-1,4-Dinitro-1,3-butadiene and N-Methyl Azomethine Ylide—A Comprehensive Experimental and Quantum-Chemical Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 5066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jasiński, R.; Dresler, E. On the Question of Zwitterionic Intermediates in the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions: A Critical Review. Organics 2020, 1, 49–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Siadati, S.A. An example of a stepwise mechanism for the catalyst-free 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition between a nitrile oxide and an electron rich alkene. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 4857–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Siadati, S.A.; Kula, K.; Babanezhad, E. The possibility of a two-step oxidation of the surface of C20fullerene by a single molecule of nitric (V) acid, initiate by a rare [2+3] cycloaddition. Chem. Rev. Lett. 2019, 2, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  32. Siadati, S.A. The Effect of Position Replacement of Functional Groups on the Stepwise character of 1,3-Dipolar Reaction of a Nitrile Oxide and an Alkene. Helv. Chim. Acta 2016, 99, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jasiński, R. Nitroacetylene as dipolarophile in [2 + 3] cycloaddition reactions with allenyl-type three-atom components: DFT computational study. Monatsh. Chem. 2015, 146, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Domingo, L.R. Molecular Electron Density Theory: A Modern View of Reactivity in Organic Chemistry. Molecules 2016, 21, 1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos Gutiérrez, M.; Castellanos Soriano, J. Understanding the Origin of the Regioselectivity in Non-Polar (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions through the Molecular Electron Density Theory. Organics 2020, 1, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Silvi, B.; Pérez, P. The Mysticism of Pericyclic Reactions: A Contemporary Rationalisation of Organic Reactivity Based on Electron Density Analysis. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1107–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Applications of the Conceptual Density Functional Theory Indices to Organic Chemistry Reactivity. Molecules 2016, 21, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Domingo, L.R. 1999–2024, a Quarter Century of the Parr’s Electrophilicity ω Index. Sci. Rad. 2024, 3, 157–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Saz Sousa, A.; Domingo, L.R. Electrophilicity and nucleophilicity scales at different DFT computational levels. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2023, 36, 4503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kącka-Zych, A. Understanding of the stability of acyclic nitronic acids in the light of molecular electron density theory. J. Mol. Graph. 2024, 129, 108754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rattananakin, P.; Pittman, C.U.; Collier, W.E.; Saebo, S. Ab initio studies of push–pull systems. Struct. Chem. 2007, 18, 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Stojiljković, I.N.; Rančić, M.P.; Marinković, A.D.; Cvijetić, I.N.; Milčić, M.K. Assessing the potential of para-donor and para-acceptor substituted 5-benzylidenebarbituric acid derivatives as push-pull electronic systems: Experimental and quantum chemical study. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 253, 119576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Leo, H.C.A.; Taft, R.W. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kącka-Zych, A. Participation of Phosphorylated Analogues of Nitroethene in Diels–Alder Reactions with Anthracene: A Molecular Electron Density Theory Study and Mechanistic Aspect. Organics 2020, 1, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gavezzotti, A. On the preferred mutual orientation of aromatic groups in organic condensed media. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 161, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ohno, A. Non-steric stereochemistry solely controlled by orientation of dipolar function. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1995, 8, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wheland, G.W. A Quantum Mechanical Investigation of the Orientation of Substituents in Aromatic Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 900–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koubi, Y.; Moukhliss, Y.; Hajji, H.; Abdessadak, O.; Alaqarbeh, M.; Ajana, M.A.; Maghat, H.; Lakhlifi, T.; Bouachrine, M. Computational structure—biological activity and retrosynthesis investigations of 1,2,3-triazole-quinoline hybrid molecules as potential respiratory virus inhibitors. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2024, 60, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gillies, J.Z.; Gillies, C.W.; Suenram, R.D.; Lovas, F.J.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. Van der Waals complexes in 1, 3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions: Ozone-ethylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2412–2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gillies, J.Z.; Gillies, C.W.; Lovas, F.J.; Matsamura, K.; Suenram, R.D.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D. Van der Waals complexes of chemically reactive gases: Ozone-acetylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 6408–6415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mondal, A.; Acharjee, N. Unveiling the exclusive stereo and site selectivity in (3+2) cycloaddition reactions of a tricyclic strained alkene with nitrile oxides from the molecular electron density theory perspective. Chem. Heterocycl. Comp. 2023, 59, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dresler, E.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. Energetic Aspects and Molecular Mechanism of 3-Nitro-substituted 2-Isoxazolines Formation via Nitrile N-Oxide (3+2) Cycloaddition: An MEDT Computational Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zawadzińska, K.; Kula, K. Application of β-Phosphorylated Nitroethenes in (3+2) Cycloaddition Reactions Involving Benzonitrile N-Oxide in the Light of a DFT Computational Study. Organics 2021, 2, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mondal, A.; Mohammad-Salim, H.A.; Acharjee, N. Unveiling substituent effects in (3+2) cycloaddition reactions of benzonitrile N-oxide and benzylideneanilines from the molecular electron density theory perspective. Sci.Rad. 2023, 2, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Łapczuk, A.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. Mechanistic Aspects of (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction of Trifluoroacetonitrile with Diarylnitrilimines in Light of Molecular Electron Density Theory Quantum Chemical Study. Molecules 2025, 30, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Aitouna, A.O.; Barhoumi, A.; Zeroual, A. A Mechanism Study and an Investigation of the Reason for the Stereoselectivity in the [4+2] Cycloaddition Reaction between Cyclopentadiene and Gem-substituted Ethylene Electrophiles. Sci. Rad. 2023, 2, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kącka-Zych, A. Understanding the uniqueness of the stepwise [4 + 1] cycloaddition reaction between conjugated nitroalkenes and electrophilic carbene systems with a molecular electron density theory perspective. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2021, 121, 26440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Abboud, J.L.M.; Notari, R. Critical compilation of scales of solvent parameters. Part I. Pure, non-hydrogen bond donor solvents. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 645–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hehre, W.J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J.A. Self—Consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XII. Further Extensions of Gaussian—Type Basis Sets for Use in Molecular Orbital Studies of Organic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chai, J.D.; Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 6615–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sadowski, M.; Dresler, E.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. A New Insight into the Molecular Mechanism of the Reaction between 2-Methoxyfuran and Ethyl (Z)-3-phenyl-2-nitroprop-2-enoate: An Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Computational Study. Molecules 2024, 29, 4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dresler, E.; Wróblewska, A.; Jasiński, R. Understanding the Molecular Mechanism of Thermal and LA-Catalysed Diels–Alder Reactions between Cyclopentadiene and Isopropyl 3-Nitroprop-2-Enate. Molecules 2023, 28, 5289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wolinski, P.; Kacka-Zych, A.; Wroblewska, A.; Wielgus, E.; Dolot, R.; Jasinski, R. Fully selective synthesis of spirocyclic-1,2-oxazine N-oxides via non-catalysed Hetero Diels-Alder reactions with the participation of cyanofunctionalysed conjugated nitroalkenes. Molecules 2023, 28, 4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V. Energies, structures, and electronic properties of molecules in solution with the C-PCM solvation model. J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Domingo, L.R. A new C–C bond formation model based on the quantum chemical topology of electron density. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32415–32428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Domingo, L.R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Electrophilicity w and Nucleophilicity N Scales for Cationic and Anionic Species. Sci. Radices 2025, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Parr, R.G.; Szentpály, L.; Liu, S. Electrophilicity Index. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Demchuk, O.M.; Justyniak, I.; Mirosław, B.; Jasiński, R. 2-Methoxynaphthylnaphthoquinone and its solvate: Synthesis and structure–properties relationship. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2014, 27, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Domingo, L.R.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. Understanding the Reactivity of Captodative Ethylenes in Polar Cycloaddition Reactions. A Theoretical Study. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4615–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Domingo, L.R.; Pérez, P.; Sáez, J.A. Understanding the local reactivity in polar organic reactions through electrophilic and nucleophilic Parr functions. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1486–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 30 00974 sch001
Scheme 1. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Scheme 1. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Molecules 30 00974 sch001
Molecules 30 00974 sch002
Scheme 2. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-3,3,3-trichloro-1-nitroprop-1-ene and arylonitrile N-oxides.
Scheme 2. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-3,3,3-trichloro-1-nitroprop-1-ene and arylonitrile N-oxides.
Molecules 30 00974 sch002
Molecules 30 00974 sch003
Scheme 3. The stepwise zwitterionic mechanism of the 32CA between trifluroacetonitrile N-oxide and vinylamine.
Scheme 3. The stepwise zwitterionic mechanism of the 32CA between trifluroacetonitrile N-oxide and vinylamine.
Molecules 30 00974 sch003
Molecules 30 00974 sch004
Scheme 4. The stepwise biradical mechanism of the 32CA between acetonitrile N-oxide and tetraaminoethene.
Scheme 4. The stepwise biradical mechanism of the 32CA between acetonitrile N-oxide and tetraaminoethene.
Molecules 30 00974 sch004
Molecules 30 00974 sch005
Scheme 5. The formation of the zwitterionic intermediate in the reaction between nitroacetylene and arylonitrile N-oxides.
Scheme 5. The formation of the zwitterionic intermediate in the reaction between nitroacetylene and arylonitrile N-oxides.
Molecules 30 00974 sch005
Molecules 30 00974 sch006
Scheme 6. Theoretical possibility of the regioisomeric paths of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Scheme 6. Theoretical possibility of the regioisomeric paths of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Molecules 30 00974 sch006
Molecules 30 00974 g001
Figure 1. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (in magenta) and populations of significant basins (isovalue = 0.75). Results for compounds 1 and 6 as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Figure 1. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (in magenta) and populations of significant basins (isovalue = 0.75). Results for compounds 1 and 6 as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Molecules 30 00974 g001
Molecules 30 00974 g002
Figure 2. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in compounds 1 and 6 as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d)); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black. Methyl groups within XMe3 (X = Si,C) substituents are equivalent; thus, only one is described in detail.
Figure 2. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in compounds 1 and 6 as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d)); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black. Methyl groups within XMe3 (X = Si,C) substituents are equivalent; thus, only one is described in detail.
Molecules 30 00974 g002
Molecules 30 00974 sch007
Scheme 7. Resonance structures proposed by Rattananakin et al. for 2-amino-1-nitroethene [41].
Scheme 7. Resonance structures proposed by Rattananakin et al. for 2-amino-1-nitroethene [41].
Molecules 30 00974 sch007
Molecules 30 00974 g003
Figure 3. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (in magenta) and populations of significant basins (isovalue = 0.75). Results for N-oxides 2a–c as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Figure 3. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (in magenta) and populations of significant basins (isovalue = 0.75). Results for N-oxides 2a–c as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Molecules 30 00974 g003
Molecules 30 00974 g004
Figure 4. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in compounds 2a–c as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d)); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black.
Figure 4. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in compounds 2a–c as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d)); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black.
Molecules 30 00974 g004
Molecules 30 00974 g005
Figure 5. Views of critical structures for the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a) in the CCl4 solution in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations.
Figure 5. Views of critical structures for the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between E-2-(trimethylsilyl)-1-nitroethene (1) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a) in the CCl4 solution in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations.
Molecules 30 00974 g005
Molecules 30 00974 g006
Figure 6. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta (isovalue = 0.75). The blue dashed lines signify which atoms will bond if the TS transforms to the products. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (ωB97XD/6-311G(d) PCM-CCl4.
Figure 6. To the left: topology of the ELF function. Monosynaptic valence basins given in red, disynaptic in green, protonated basins in cyan, and core basins in magenta (isovalue = 0.75). The blue dashed lines signify which atoms will bond if the TS transforms to the products. To the right: positions of ELF attractors (ωB97XD/6-311G(d) PCM-CCl4.
Molecules 30 00974 g006
Molecules 30 00974 g007
Figure 7. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in TSA and TSB as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d), PCM CCl4); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black.
Figure 7. Natural charges of atoms (in electrons) in TSA and TSB as computed at the ground state in gaseous phase (ωB97XD/6-311G(d), PCM CCl4); charges > 0.2 e are given in red, charges < −0.2 are given in blue, and other charges are given in black.
Molecules 30 00974 g007
Molecules 30 00974 sch008
Scheme 8. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between 1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-acetylethene (7) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Scheme 8. Experimentally observed course of the (3+2) cycloaddition reaction between 1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-acetylethene (7) and benzonitrile N-oxide (2a).
Molecules 30 00974 sch008
Table 1. Chemical potential (µ), chemical hardness (η), global electrophilicity (ω), and nucleophilicity (N) of compounds 1, 2a–c, and 6, as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d); all values are expressed in eV.
Table 1. Chemical potential (µ), chemical hardness (η), global electrophilicity (ω), and nucleophilicity (N) of compounds 1, 2a–c, and 6, as computed via ωB97XD/6-311G(d); all values are expressed in eV.
CompoundμηωN
1−5.459.741.531.07
6−5.349.931.441.09
2a−4.108.780.962.91
2b−3.398.470.683.77
2c−5.247.801.762.26
Table 2. Parr function values and local electrophilicity and nucleophilicity for significant atoms in alkenes 1 and 6.
Table 2. Parr function values and local electrophilicity and nucleophilicity for significant atoms in alkenes 1 and 6.
Molecules 30 00974 i001CompoundXωC5 (P+C5)ωC4 (P+C4)NC5 (P−C5)NC4 (P−C4)
1Si0.58 (0.38)0.11 (0.07)0.08 (0.08)0.03 (0.02)
6C0.59 (0.41)−0.01 (0.00)−0.02 (−0.02)0.00 (0.00)
Table 3. Parr function values and local electrophilicity and nucleophilicity for significant atoms in N-nitrile oxides 2a–c.
Table 3. Parr function values and local electrophilicity and nucleophilicity for significant atoms in N-nitrile oxides 2a–c.
Molecules 30 00974 i002CompoundRωC3 (P+C3)ωO1 (P+O1)NC3 (P−C3)NO1 (P−O1)
2aH−0.05 (−0.05)0.08 (0.08)0.07 (0.02)1.46 (0.50)
2bNH20.01 (0.02)−0.01 (−0.02)−0.38 (−0.10)1.24 (0.33)
2cNO2−0.12 (−0.07)0.10 (0.06)0.15 (0.07)1.20 (0.53)
Table 4. Populations of bonding regions and bond lengths in compounds 1 and 6, ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Table 4. Populations of bonding regions and bond lengths in compounds 1 and 6, ωB97XD/6-311G(d).
Molecules 30 00974 i003CompoundXC4-C5 population 1lC4-C5 2lC4-N7 2lC5-X6 2lX6-CMe 3
1Si3.451.321.471.881.87
6C3.581.321.461.501.53
1 Population of C4-C5 ELF bonding volume in electrons; 2 bond length in Å; 3 bond length in Å between atom X and a carbon atom of methyl group in XMe3 substituent.
Table 5. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the (3+2) cycloaddition reactions between (trimethylsilyl)-substituted alkenes (1 and 7) and nitrile N-oxides (2a–c) in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations (ΔH, ΔG are in kcal/mol; ΔS are in cal/molK).
Table 5. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for the (3+2) cycloaddition reactions between (trimethylsilyl)-substituted alkenes (1 and 7) and nitrile N-oxides (2a–c) in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations (ΔH, ΔG are in kcal/mol; ΔS are in cal/molK).
ReactionSolventPathTransitionΔHΔSΔG
1 + 2aCCl4A1 + 2a→MCA−6.0−34.14.2
1 + 2a→TSA10.4−48.424.8
1 + 2a→4a−46.4−51.3−31.1
B1 + 2a→MCB−4.6−33.15.3
1 + 2a→TSB10.8−45.524.4
1 + 2a→5a−38.7−48.4−24.3
AcetoneA1 + 2a→MCA−5.6−33.24.3
1 + 2a→TSA11.1−48.625.6
1 + 2a→4a−46.2−51.0−30.9
B1 + 2a→MCB−5.1−41.67.3
1 + 2a→TSB12.1−46.025.8
1 + 2a→5a−37.5−49.4−22.8
A1 + 2a→MCA−5.6−33.44.4
MeNO2 1 + 2a→TSA11.1−48.625.6
1 + 2a→4a−46.2−50.9−31.0
B1 + 2a→MCB−5.1−41.67.3
1 + 2a→TSB12.2−45.825.8
1 + 2a→5a−37.4−49.5−22.7
1 + 2bCCl4A1 + 2b→MCA−6.6−35.23.9
1 + 2b→TSA9.7−48.024.0
1 + 2b→4b−46.2−49.3−31.5
B1 + 2b→MCB−4.9−34.05.2
1 + 2b→TSB9.5−45.523.1
1 + 2b→5b−38.4−49.0−23.8
1 + 2cCCl4A1 + 2c→MCA−5.6−38.86.0
1 + 2c→TSA10.9−48.625.4
1 + 2c→4c−47.2−51.6−31.8
B1 + 2c→MCB−5.4−37.85.9
1 + 2c→TSB11.7−49.226.3
1 + 2c→5c−39.9−49.6−25.1
2a + 7CCl4A2a + 7→MCA−5.9−35.04.6
2a + 7→TSA10.6−42.323.2
2a + 7→8−44.9−48.5−30.5
B2a + 7→MCA−6.5−36.14.3
2a + 7→TSA10.6−46.524.5
2a + 7→9−41.5−53.0−25.7
Table 6. Key parameters of critical structures for the (3+2) cycloaddition reactions between (trimethylsilyl)-substituted alkenes (1 and 7) and nitrile N-oxides (2a–c) in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations.
Table 6. Key parameters of critical structures for the (3+2) cycloaddition reactions between (trimethylsilyl)-substituted alkenes (1 and 7) and nitrile N-oxides (2a–c) in light of the ωB97XD/6-311+G(d) (PCM) calculations.
SolventPathStructureInteratomic Distances [Å]GEDT
O1-N2N2-C3C3-C4C4-C5C5-O1[e]
CCl4A1 1.324
2a1.2101.154
MCA1.2091.1543.6041.3243.671
TSA1.2181.2032.1261.3662.2690.25
4a1.4151.2781.5011.5211.379
BMCB1.2131.1533.4291.3253.057
TSB1.2331.2002.2041.3722.1430.17
5a1.3571.2791.5101.5191.459
AcetoneA1 1.325
2a1.2171.152
MCA1.2151.1533.6701.3253.778
TSA1.2211.2032.1111.3672.2820.27
4a1.4201.2791.4991.5191.379
BMCB1.2161.1534.4311.3254.928
TSB1.2371.1992.2111.3722.1360.16
5a1.3601.2801.5111.5181.460
MeNO2A1 1.325
2a1.2171.152
MCA1.2161.1523.6711.3253.776
TSA1.2211.2032.1101.3672.2840.27
4a1.4201.2791.4981.5191.379
BMCB1.2161.1534.4301.3254.927
TSB1.2371.1992.2121.3732.1350.16
5a1.3601.2801.5111.5181.461
CCl4A2b1.2151.154
MCA1.2141.1553.6041.3243.706
TSA1.2231.2052.1291.3662.2440.20
4b1.4201.2801.5031.5201.376
BMCB1.2171.1533.4101.3253.043
TSB1.2391.2032.2251.3732.1000.21
5b1.3631.2801.5121.5181.457
CCl4A2c1.2041.155
MCA1.2031.1553.6311.3243.726
TSA1.2131.2032.1331.3652.2870.31
4c1.4071.2781.5001.5211.382
BMCB1.2071.1543.4421.3253.120
TSB1.2271.1992.1961.3702.1740.15
5c1.3481.4621.5181.5101.280
CCl4A7 1.338
MC1.2101.1543.4491.3373.958
TS1.2171.2022.1371.3752.4170.24
81.3881.2781.5081.5301.450
BMC1.2141.1533.5941.3383.462
TS1.2321.2022.2931.3852.1100.05
91.3801.2781.5191.5471.437
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sadowski, M.; Dresler, E.; Jasiński, R. The Puzzle of the Regioselectivity and Molecular Mechanism of the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction Between E-2-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-Nitroethene and Arylonitrile N-Oxides: Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Quantumchemical Study. Molecules 2025, 30, 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040974

AMA Style

Sadowski M, Dresler E, Jasiński R. The Puzzle of the Regioselectivity and Molecular Mechanism of the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction Between E-2-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-Nitroethene and Arylonitrile N-Oxides: Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Quantumchemical Study. Molecules. 2025; 30(4):974. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040974

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sadowski, Mikołaj, Ewa Dresler, and Radomir Jasiński. 2025. "The Puzzle of the Regioselectivity and Molecular Mechanism of the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction Between E-2-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-Nitroethene and Arylonitrile N-Oxides: Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Quantumchemical Study" Molecules 30, no. 4: 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040974

APA Style

Sadowski, M., Dresler, E., & Jasiński, R. (2025). The Puzzle of the Regioselectivity and Molecular Mechanism of the (3+2) Cycloaddition Reaction Between E-2-(Trimethylsilyl)-1-Nitroethene and Arylonitrile N-Oxides: Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) Quantumchemical Study. Molecules, 30(4), 974. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30040974

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop