Next Article in Journal
The Hypothalamic Nuclei Implicated in the Regulation of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Review of Its Clinical, Metabolic, and Endocrine Aspects
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Technologies for Wastewater Treatment: Graphene-Based Catalysts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controlled Formation of α- and β-Bi2O3 with Tunable Morphologies for Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gold Nanoparticles-Functionalized Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Boosting Solar Hydrogen Production: The Role of Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Electric Fields

1
Langfang Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
2
Center for Geophysical Survey, China Geological Survey, Langfang 065000, China
3
Natural Resources Comprehensive Survey Command Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100055, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(16), 3406; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163406
Submission received: 7 July 2025 / Revised: 5 August 2025 / Accepted: 8 August 2025 / Published: 18 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Catalysis Technology for Sustainable Energy Conversion)

Abstract

The design of photocatalysts capable of generating localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effects represents a promising strategy for enhancing photocatalytic activity. However, the mechanistic role of plasmonic nanoparticles-induced interfacial electric fields in driving photocatalytic processes remains poorly understood. To produce a Schottky junction, varying amounts of Au nanoparticles widely utilized to broaden the light absorption were loaded onto ultrathin carbon nitride sheets (Au/UCN). The Au/UCN-20 Schottky junction exhibits exceptional photocatalytic activity, achieving a hydrogen evolution rate (14.2 mmol·g−1 over a 4 h period) while maintaining robust stability through five consecutive photocatalytic cycles. The LSPR activity of Au nanoparticles are responsible for the broadened light absorption spectrum of Au/UCN nanocomposites. The interfacial electric field generated at the Au /UCN heterojunction is proposed to enhance charge-transfer efficiency through Schottky barrier penetration of photocarriers, mediated by electric field-driven carrier migration, according to surface potential and finite-difference time-domain (FDTD). These findings uncover a previously obscured photocatalytic mechanism driven by LSPR-induced interfacial electric fields, pioneering a quantum-dot-directed strategy to precisely engineer charge dynamics in advanced photocatalysts via targeted manipulation of nanoscale electric field effects.

1. Introduction

Clean and sustainable energy has become a critical and urgent requirement for minimizing the excessive use of limited fossil fuels and addressing major environmental challenges [1]. Solar energy, being an inexhaustible clean energy source that fuels all life on Earth, is thought to be the most exploitable [2]. Photocatalytic water splitting is regarded as a viable and environmentally friendly method for converting solar energy into pure hydrogen [3,4]. With a utilization rate of less than 50% of the solar energy, the majority of photocatalysts used for this conversion are semiconductor materials with broad band gaps (TiO2, ZnO, Fe2O3, and WO3), which limits it to the visible or ultraviolet area [5,6,7,8]. Therefore, it is important to figure out how to make sure that near-infrared (NIR) photons are used efficiently in solar energy and to further implement full-spectrum photocatalytic water splitting.
Currently, numerous kinds of photocatalysts have been produced, such as metal oxides, chalcogenides, carbon nitride, and other metal–organic framework compounds [9,10,11,12]. It was reported that g-C3N4 has an ultrathin nanosheet structure in two dimensions. Owing to its exceptional structural and optoelectronic properties—including enhanced surface area, pore volume, robust stability, a tailored bandgap structure, and a distinctive two-dimensional layered architecture—this material exhibits remarkable photoelectric response and photocatalytic efficiency. These attributes collectively contribute to its widespread application in solar-driven water splitting systems [13,14]. However, the recombination of photoexcited holes and electrons as well as the limited number of active sites are the two primary problems restricting the usage of g-C3N4 as a photocatalyst. A variety of strategies have been investigated to overcome the g-C3N4 bottleneck issues mentioned above [15]. These strategies include co-catalyst loading, surface modifications, and heterojunction construction [16,17].
Decorating ultrathin g-C3N4 sheets with plasmonic metal particles (Au, Ag) can improve photocatalytic performance by acting as a charge sink and strong LSPR effect [18,19,20]. The surface electrical structure of the support is significantly influenced by the size and shape of particles [21]. In catalytic reactions, the low utilization efficiency of metal atoms often results in poor activity or performance for plasmonic metal co-catalysts with larger particle sizes. As the metal particle size decreases, the number of surface low-coordination atoms progressively increases, leading to higher exposure ratios. Concurrently, the interfacial contact area between the metal co-catalyst and the catalyst expands. This synergistic effect not only enhances the atomic utilization efficiency of the metal co-catalyst but also induces significant modifications in both the structural properties and active site distribution of the catalytic material [22]. Since Au nanoparticles may induce energy transfer, facilitate hot electron injection, and magnify electron scattering, their optimal energy level and LSPR effect have drawn attention from the general public [23,24,25]. The immobilization of gold nanoparticles on ultrathin g-C3N4 photocatalysts represents an effective strategy for performance enhancement, originating from the distinctive properties of Au and their ability to optimize the catalyst’s electronic structure. Investigating the photocatalytic reaction kinetics and the interfacial electric field induced by LSPR constitutes another crucial aspect of this research.
Herein, we report the in situ synthesis of plasmonic Au nanoparticles anchored on g-C3N4 nanosheets, constructing the Au/UCN heterojunction photocatalyst for efficient broad-spectrum solar-driven water splitting. Under UV-range excitation, the Au/UCN system exhibits enhanced photocatalytic activity primarily attributed to the intrinsic bandgap transition of g-C3N4. Meanwhile, the LSPR effect of Au quantum dots functions as a Vis-NIR light harvester, generating hot charge carriers that inject into g-C3N4 to drive visible-light photocatalytic processes. In order to provide unique and beneficial entire-solar-spectrum photocatalytic water splitting, the results showed that the LSPR of Au effectively extended the photocatalytic activity of UCN-based photocatalyst to NIR light. To elucidate the fundamental mechanism underlying the high catalytic activity, this study adopts an integrated research strategy combining theoretical calculations with experimental verification. By synergizing surface potential distribution analysis with finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations, we reveal the physical mechanism by which the synergistic interaction between localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effects and in-plane electric fields regulates photogenerated carrier migration. These systematic findings provide crucial theoretical guidance for the structural design of quantum-dot-based composite photocatalysts.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structural Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was systematically employed to characterize the crystal structures of both pristine UCN nanomaterials and the Au/UCN nanocomposite system formed by combining with gold nanoparticles. The XRD patterns (Figure 1a) revealed distinct characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 12.7° and 27.0° for the unmodified UCN sample, which were indexed to the (100) and (002) crystallographic planes of the hexagonal phase, respectively [26]. Studies indicate that these characteristic diffraction peaks originate from the unique layered structural arrangement and molecular stacking configuration of UCN materials [27]. In the XRD profile of the Au/UCN composite, in addition to the characteristic peaks of UCN, new diffraction signals were detected at 38.1°, 44.5°, 64.4°, and 77.5°. These additional peaks show perfect correspondence with the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of face-centered cubic gold nanocrystals [28]. Notably, with increasing Au content, the intensity of UCN characteristic peaks at 12.7° and 27.0° gradually decreased, accompanied by peak broadening. This phenomenon can be attributed to the incorporation of Au into the (002) crystal plane of UCN, leading to structural distortion and fragmentation. Furthermore, as illustrated in Figure 1b, the characteristic (002) peak of UCN undergoes a slight shift, suggesting strong interfacial interactions between Au nanoparticles and UCN, as well as the weakening of interlayer van der Waals forces in UCN upon modification with Au nanoparticles [29].
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis was conducted to investigate the elemental composition and chemical states of the Au/UCN composite (Figure 2). The survey spectrum (Figure 2a) exhibits characteristic peaks corresponding to Au, C, and N elements, confirming the coexistence of metallic gold and g-C3N4 in the composite. High-resolution XPS spectra provide further insights into the chemical bonding characteristics; the deconvoluted C 1s spectrum (Figure 2b) reveals two distinct components at 284.6 eV and 287.9 eV [30]. These binding energies are characteristic of graphitic carbon (C-C) and sp2-hybridized carbon atoms in the heterocyclic N-C=N structure of g-C3N4, respectively. Similarly, the N 1s spectrum (Figure 2c) displays two resolved peaks at 398.5 eV and 400.0 eV, corresponding to sp2-bonded nitrogen in C-N=C coordination and tertiary nitrogen atoms in N-(C)3 groups [31]. Notably, the Au 4f spectrum (Figure 2d) exhibits spin–orbit split peaks at 83.0 eV (Au 4f7/2) and 86.7 eV (Au 4f5/2) with a splitting energy of 3.7 eV, which is characteristic of metallic gold (Au0) [32]. Compared to the standard Au0 reference values (84.0 eV for Au 4f7/2 and 87.7 eV for Au 4f5/2), the observed negative shifts in binding energies suggest strong interfacial interactions and electron transfer between Au nanoparticles and the UCN substrate [33]. Complementary FT-IR analysis (Figure S1) confirms the preservation of g-C3N4’s structural integrity after Au nanoparticle decoration. Both pristine g-C3N4 and Au/UCN composites exhibit characteristic vibrational modes: the sharp peak at 810 cm−1 corresponds to out-of-plane bending vibrations of triazine rings; multiple peaks between 1200 and 1700 cm−1 arise from stretching vibrations of C-N heterocycles; a weak absorption at 2180 cm−1 indicates the presence of terminal cyano groups (-C≡N); and broad bands in the 3100–3500 cm−1 region are attributed to N-H stretching vibrations. The FT-IR spectra show no significant alterations in peak positions or relative intensities after Au incorporation, demonstrating that the Au does not induce detectable changes in the crystal structure or chemical bonding configuration of the g-C3N4 matrix [34].
The morphology and nanostructural characteristics of the Au/UCN were systematically investigated through TEM analysis (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3a, the Au nanoparticles demonstrate uniform anchoring on the UCN substrate, with intimate interfacial contact observed between the Au nanostructures and the g-C3N4 matrix—a crucial feature for facilitating efficient interfacial charge transfer. Elemental mapping analysis confirms the homogeneous distribution of Au species across the carbon nitride support. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) examination (Figure 3b) reveals well-defined lattice fringes with a measured spacing of 0.235 nm, corresponding to the (111) crystallographic plane of face-centered cubic Au [23]. Notably, while conventional Au nanoparticles typically exhibit average diameters of ~19 nm [30], the synthesized composite shows significantly reduced Au particle sizes of approximately 10 nm. This marked size reduction suggests that the g-C3N4 substrate exerts a pronounced size-confinement effect during nanoparticle nucleation and growth, likely through its rich nitrogen-containing functional groups that act as anchoring sites.
The combination of morphological observations, crystallographic analysis, and elemental distribution profiles provides conclusive evidence for the quantum dot nature of the Au species in the composite. These TEM findings, when correlated with complementary HRTEM, XRD, and XPS data presented in earlier sections, collectively demonstrate the successful fabrication of the Au/UCN heterostructure with well-defined interfacial characteristics.

2.2. Photoelectrochemical Performance

Employing transmissive photocurrent detection technique, this investigation systematically explores the photoinduced charge carrier dynamics in upconversion nanoparticles (UCNs) and their hybrid systems with gold nanoparticles (Au/UCNs), with particular emphasis on charge-transfer kinetics and separation efficiency. Experimental results (Figure 4a) revealed that both nanostructures exhibited pronounced photoresponsive behavior under visible-light excitation. Upon light illumination, the system promptly generated detectable photocurrent signals, while immediate current attenuation was observed following illumination cessation. This distinct temporal response pattern conclusively demonstrates the material’s superior capabilities in photoinduced charge separation and transfer. The photocurrent density progression followed this hierarchical order: UCN < Au/UCN-5 < Au/UCN-10 < Au/UCN-15 < Au/UCN-30 < Au/UCN-20. Complementary electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis (Figure 4b) revealed interfacial charge-transfer characteristics through Nyquist plot evaluation [35]. The arc radius progression was inversely correlated with the photocurrent performance in the following order: UCN > Au/UCN-5 > Au/UCN-10 > Au/UCN-15 > Au/UCN-30 > Au/UCN-20. The minimal semicircular radius observed for Au/UCN-20 signifies two critical advantages: (1) significantly reduced charge-transfer resistance, and (2) enhanced interfacial charge migration kinetics. This synergistic enhancement explains the superior photoelectrochemical performance of the Au/UCN-20 heterostructure. Steady-state photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was employed to investigate recombination dynamics of photogenerated electron–hole pairs in the semiconductor systems (Figure 4c). Pristine UCN exhibited maximum emission intensity at 460–465 nm, which is characteristic of intrinsic band-edge recombination. Notably, Au nanoparticles incorporation induced a bathochromic shift in the PL peak to 475–480 nm, a phenomenon attributed to the hybridization of Au’s 4f orbitals with the host matrix. This electronic interaction effectively modifies the band structure by filling mid-gap states, thereby reducing the energy disparity between π* antibonding and lone-pair (LP) orbitals [36]. To elucidate the mechanism of Au nanoparticles in suppressing electron–hole recombination, time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) spectroscopy was employed to probe carrier dynamics. Comparative analysis revealed a substantial reduction in the average electron lifetime from 3.14 ns for pristine UCN to 0.41 ns for the Au/UCN-20 composite (Figure 4d). This pronounced lifetime quenching unambiguously demonstrates that Au nanoparticles act as efficient electron sinks, facilitating rapid electron extraction from the UCN host matrix to its surface. The accelerated charge migration kinetics directly correlate with suppressed carrier recombination, thereby enhancing the availability of photogenerated electrons for surface-mediated redox processes.
UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) was systematically employed to evaluate the light-harvesting properties of pristine UCN and its Au/UCN-20 composite (Figure 5a). Both materials exhibited a fundamental absorption edge near 450 nm, characteristic of the host semiconductor. Notably, the Au/UCN-20 heterostructure demonstrated markedly enhanced absorption in the 700–800 nm range, a phenomenon ascribed to the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) of metallic Au nanoparticles [37]. Furthermore, bandgap engineering was quantitatively analyzed using Tauc plot methodology derived from the Kubelka–Munk transformation, (αhν) = A(hν − Eg)n/2 [38], where the Eg values of UCN and Au/UCN-20 are 2.71 and 2.42 eV, respectively (Figure 5b), demonstrating two critical effects: 1. band structure modulation: Au incorporation introduces intragap states that narrow the effective bandgap; 2. LSPR synergy: plasmonic excitation of Au enables sub-bandgap photon utilization. This dual mechanism synergistically enhances light absorption cross-sections while promoting hot electron injection, establishing a photophysical foundation for the observed photocatalytic enhancement.

2.3. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution experiments were conducted under full-spectrum simulated solar irradiation (UV-vis-NIR) and wavelengths longer than 420 nm (vis-NIR) and 700 nm (NIR) light irradiation, using triethanolamine (TEOA) as a hole scavenger to suppress charge recombination. Blank control experiments confirmed the essentiality of both photocatalyst presence and photon activation, as no measurable hydrogen generation occurred in their absence. The activity hierarchy of the synthesized materials followed this descending order: Au/UCN-20 > Au/UCN-30 > Au/UCN-15 > Au/UCN-10 > Au/UCN-5 > UCN. The Au/UCN-20 composite demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving a cumulative hydrogen yield of 14.2 mmol·g−1 over 4 h with linear production kinetics under UV-vis-NIR (Figure 6a). The detailed hydrogen evolution rates of UCN and Au/UCN photocatalysts were shown in Figure S2. In order to investigate the absorption and utilization efficiency of catalysts for light in different wavelength ranges, we conducted comparative experiments on UCN and Au NPs/UCN-20, separately. From Figure S3, the amount of H2 generated from Au NPs/UCN-20 sample increased with the time and reached 19.4 mmol·g−1 under solar irradiation (UV-vis-NIR) for 5 h. Based on Figure S4, we obtained the evolution of H2 under irradiation from UV, visible, and NIR light. Under NIR light irradiation, the H2 evolution is at its maximum compared to production capacities under UV and visible-light illumination (Figure 6b), consistent with the full-spectrum absorption properties of UCN and Au NPs /UCN-20 (Figure S4). This exceptional NIR performance originates from plasmon-mediated hot electron transfer mechanisms, where non-radiative decay of Au nanoparticle localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) generates high-energy electrons that inject into UCN’s conduction band, effectively overcoming traditional bandgap limitations [39]. The wavelength-dependent apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of H2 production over the photocatalysts was measured to further reflect the efficiency of the catalyst in converting light energy into chemical energy. As shown in Figure 6c, the AQE action spectrum closely matches the absorption characteristics. The Au/UCN composite demonstrates unprecedented NIR responsiveness at 900 nm, outperforming conventional UCN photocatalysts and marking significant progress in full-spectrum solar energy conversion. Stability assessments (Figure 6d) through repeated H2 evolution cycles reveal outstanding durability. AQE analysis confirms that light-excited electrons from both components drive the photocatalytic process under optimal conditions. The composite maintains consistent hydrogen production activity across multiple cycles with negligible degradation, highlighting its practical potential.

2.4. Analysis of the Photocatalytic Mechanism

FDTD simulations were systematically conducted to unravel the plasmonic coupling mechanisms and near-field enhancement effects in the Au/UCN heterostructure [40]. As illustrated in Figure 7, distinct electromagnetic field distribution patterns emerged under 400 nm (visible) and 900 nm (NIR) excitations. As shown in 7b, Au is uniformly distributed in UCN nanosheets. While moderate field intensification occurred at 400 nm, localized primarily at Au/UCN interfacial regions (Figure 7c), exceptional field amplification was achieved under 900 nm irradiation (Figure 7d), demonstrating wavelength-dependent plasmon resonance modes. Control simulations of pristine UCN (Figure 7a) confirmed the absence of NIR-responsive electromagnetic activity, underscoring the critical role of Au nanoparticles in enabling beyond-bandgap photon utilization. Three synergistic phenomena were computationally validated: (i) Au nanoparticles act as optical antennas, concentrating incident photons into subwavelength hotspots; (ii) the 900 nm LSPR mode exhibits stronger near-field enhancement than the 400 nm mode, aligned with experimental AQE maxima; (iii) constructive overlap between UCN’s inherent polarization field and Au’s plasmonic near-field establishes a unidirectional electron transfer highway. This multiscale electromagnetic coupling reduces carrier migration barriers, achieving a record improvement in interfacial charge injection efficiency over conventional Schottky-junction photocatalysts. The computational insights fundamentally rationalize the experimentally observed NIR-driven photocatalytic supremacy, providing a blueprint for designing broadband solar energy converters through targeted plasmon–exciton interactions.
The interfacial charge-transfer mechanisms in Au/UCN heterostructures were investigated using combined Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) [41]. AFM topographic characterization (Figure S5) verified stable morphology under illumination, excluding light-induced structural degradation. KPFM measurements revealed significant light-dependent surface potential variations (Figure 8a,b), with a 28 mV potential difference (point a to b) in dark conditions establishing a baseline interfacial field (blue interface line). Under illumination, this potential difference increased to 52 mV, demonstrating enhanced field strength and corresponding electron transfer from UCN to Au nanoparticles [42]. The observed carrier accumulation was quantified through comparative potential analysis, showing an average surface potential decrease from 562.3 mV (dark) to 299.4 mV (illuminated), corresponding to a 262.9 mV light-induced potential shift that confirms efficient interfacial charge separation.
Based on FDTD simulations and surface potential analysis of the photocatalytic process, Scheme 1 proposes a plausible mechanism for the Au/UCN system, driven by the LSPR effect of Au nanoparticles. Under light irradiation, g-C3N4 absorbs short-wavelength photons to generate electron–hole pairs, while Au nanoparticles simultaneously harness long-wavelength light via LSPR excitation. The photogenerated electrons in the conduction band of g-C3N4 migrate to the Au nanoparticle surfaces, facilitated by the Schottky barrier formed at the Au/UCN interface. This barrier efficiently extracts hot electrons, enhances charge separation, and suppresses carrier recombination. Critically, the quantum-confined Au NPs (~10 nm) act as electron sinks and provide active sites for proton reduction, slashing charge recombination (reducing carrier lifetime 7.7-fold to 0.41 ns). This dual function—maximized by the NPs’ size which enhances interfacial contact—enables efficient H+-to-H2 conversion. Furthermore, LSPR-induced effects (hot electron injection, local electromagnetic field enhancement, and interfacial electric field generation) synergistically accelerate directional charge migration. The resulting interfacial electric field serves as a “charge highway,” integrating plasmonic energy harvesting with rapid carrier separation for full-spectrum photocatalysis.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis of Au/UCN

Au/UCN was prepared through an in situ reduction process. First, 0.4 g of ultrathin two-dimensional g-C3N4 and 20 mL of 0.01 M of HAuCl4·4H2O were dissolved in a 100 mL methanol and water mixture solution (Vmethanol:VH2O = 5:1) by vigorous stirring and 20 min of sonication for 24 h at room temperature. Next, a suitable amount of 1 M NaOH was added dropwise to the beaker and constantly stirred for 20 min. We centrifuged the reaction kettle to extract the precipitated product once it had cooled naturally to room temperature. After filtration using ethanol and deionized water, the precipitate was dried at 60 °C. The name Au/UCN was given to the solid sample that was obtained. The same technique was used to create several Au/UCN samples using HAuCl4·4H2O as the feed mass (5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 mL). The reagents used are analytically pure. The amount of reagent added was shown in Table S1.

3.2. Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Measurement

The photocatalytic hydrogen production was measured using an all-glass trace gas analysis system. In the typical procedure, 20 mg of catalyst powder was uniformly dispersed in solution mixed with 90 mL of deionized water and 10 mL of triethanolamine. Prior to irradiation, the reactant solution was subjected to multiple evacuation cycles to ensure complete removal of air. The photocatalytic reactions were conducted under a 300 W xenon lamp, with the reactant solution temperature maintained at 20 °C through a circulating cooling system. The evolved gaseous products were continuously analyzed using an online gas chromatograph GC-2014C (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan).

3.3. Samples Characterizations

Systematic characterization of the catalyst was achieved through a combination of advanced analytical techniques. FT-IR spectra were acquired using a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). High-resolution structural information was obtained through TEM/HRTEM measurements performed on an FEI Tecnai-G2 F30 system (FEI Company, Waltham, MA, USA) at 300 kV. The crystalline structure was verified by XRD (PANalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα radiation (1.5418 Å) at 40 kV/40 mA. Chemical states were analyzed by XPS (Axis Supra, Uppsala, Sweden) employing monochromatic Al Kα excitation (1486.6 eV, 14 kV, 15 mA), with data collected from a 300 μm × 700 μm area at 100 eV pass energy. Spectral calibration referenced the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV, followed by Casa XPS software (CasaXPS 2.3.25) processing. Optical absorption characteristics were evaluated by UV-vis DRS (Agilent Cary 5000, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

3.4. FDTD Simulation

The LSPR generation mechanism and interfacial electric field evolution were investigated using FDTD simulations. A computational model was established using the following parameters: (1) an aqueous solution environment (refractive index n = 1.33), (2) PML boundary conditions for electromagnetic wave absorption, and (3) material-specific dielectric constants retrieved from the material library of the software. Gold nanoparticles dimensions were directly imported from the experimental transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization data. Electric field distribution profiles were captured through cross-sectional field monitors, with a maximum mesh refinement of 0.25 nm implemented to ensure numerical accuracy.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully synthesized Au/UCN composites with optimized photoelectron transport efficiency and pronounced LSPR effects. The Au/UCN-20 sample demonstrates exceptional photocatalytic performance, achieving a remarkable hydrogen evolution rate of 14.2 mmol·g−1 over 4 h and maintaining high stability through five consecutive reaction cycles. Photoelectrochemical characterization (photocurrent response, EIS analysis, and TRPL spectroscopy), combined with FDTD simulations and KPFM, reveals that the LSPR properties of Au nanoparticles contribute to multiple beneficial effects: (1) generation of energetic hot electrons, (2) strong localization of electromagnetic fields, and (3) creation of interfacial electric fields. These mechanisms synergistically enhance charge carrier transport, leading to a significant increase in photocatalytic activity. This research deciphers the elusive quantum dynamics of plasmon-exciton coupling in photocatalysis, establishing a universally applicable paradigm to revolutionize LSPR-mediated photocatalyst design via atomically precise interfacial field engineering—shattering the long-standing efficiency bottleneck in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30163406/s1, Figure S1: FT-IR spectra of Au QDs/UCN and g-C3N4; Figure S2: Hydrogen evolution rates of UCN and Au/UCN photocatalysts; Figure S3: Comparison of H2 production rate over UCN and Au NPs/UCN-20 samples under UV-vis-NIR, vis-NIR and NIR light irradiation; Figure S4: The light absorption characteristics of UCN and Au NPs/UCN-20 (UV, vis, NIR); Figure S5: AFM of Au QDs/UCN before (a) and after (b)illumination; Table S1:The amount of reagent added for preparing Au/UCN with different content of Au (Determine the actual content of gold through ICP-MS verification).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y. and P.Q.; methodology, H.Y. and Q.G.; software, R.W.; validation, R.W., X.L. and J.L.; formal analysis, H.Y., Q.G. and X.S.; investigation, H.Y. and Z.W.; resources, X.Z.; data curation, D.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.Q. and H.Y.; writing—review and editing, P.Q.; visualization, L.F.; supervision, J.L.; project administration, X.L.; funding acquisition, X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Technical Support and Services for Gold and Other Strategic Mineral Analysis, grant number DD20251133.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the reported results are available on reasonable request to the first author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Muzaffar, A.; Ahamed, M.B.; Hussain, C.M. Green supercapacitors: Latest developments and perspectives in the pursuit of sustainability. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 195, 114324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Imran, M.; Zaman, K.; Nassani, A.A.; Dincă, G.; Khan, H.U.R.; Haffar, M. Does nuclear energy reduce carbon emissions despite using fuels and chemicals? Transition to clean energy and finance for green solutions. Geosci. Front. 2023, 15, 101608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yu, Z.; Duan, Y.; Feng, X.; Yu, X.; Gao, M.; Yu, S. Clean and Affordable Hydrogen Fuel from Alkaline Water Splitting: Past, Recent Progress, and Future Prospects. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yu, M.; Zheng, J.; Guo, M. La-doped NiFe-LDH coupled with hierarchical vertically aligned MXene frameworks for efficient overall water splitting. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 70, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Thuan, D.; Ngo, H.L.; Thi, H.P.; Chu, T.T.H. Photodegradation of hazardous organic pollutants using titanium oxides -based photocatalytic: A review. Environ. Res. 2023, 229, 116000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, P.; Maia, G.; Praserthdam, S.; Praserthdam, P. Renovated FeCoP-NC nanospheres wrapped by CoP-NC nanopetals: As a tremendously effectual and robust MOF-assisted electrocatalyst for hydrogen energy production. Environ. Res. 2024, 246, 118153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kakavandi, B.; Moradi, M.; Hasanvandian, F.; Bahadoran, A.; Mohebolkhames, E.; Golshan, M.; Ganachari, S.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Visible light-assisted S-scheme p- and n-type semiconductors anchored onto graphene for increased photocatalytic H2 production via water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhou, X.; Xian, Y.; Li, Z.; Yujie, C.; Luo, J.; Ning, X.; Fan, X.; Zhong, Y.; Zhou, X. All-solid-state red phosphorus/RGO/WO3 Z-scheme heterostructure for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 357, 130117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, D.-E.; Danish, M.; Alam, U.; Jo, W.-K. Review on inorganic and polymeric materials-coordinated metal-organic-framework photocatalysts for green hydrogen evolution. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 92, 322–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Yang, X.; Guo, X.; Jin, Z. Flowered molybdenum base trimetallic oxide decorated by CdS nanorod construct S-scheme heterojunctions for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 196, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mao, L.; Zhai, B.; Shi, J.; Kang, X.; Lu, B.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, C.; Jin, H.; Lichtfouse, E.; Guo, L. Supercritical CH3OH-Triggered Isotype Heterojunction and Groups in g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 13939–13949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shahid, M.U.; Najam, T.; Helal, M.H.; Hossain, I.; El-Bahy, S.M.; El-Bahy, Z.M.; Rehman, A.U.; Shah, S.S.A.; Nazir, M.A. Transition metal chalcogenides and phosphides for photocatalytic H2 generation via water splitting: A critical review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 62, 1113–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, X.; Yu, X.; Peng, L.; Luo, J.; Ning, X.; Fan, X.; Zhou, X.; Zhou, X. Pd(II) coordination molecule modified g-C3N4 for boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 671, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, D.; Jiang, L.; Chen, D.; Hao, Z.; Deng, B.; Sun, Y.; Liu, X.; Jia, B.; Chen, L.; Liu, H. Twin S-Scheme g-C3N4/CuFe2O4/ZnIn2S4 Heterojunction with a Self-Supporting Three-Phase System for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: Mechanism Insight and DFT Calculations. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 5326–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rezaei, M.; Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.; Massah, A.R. A Comprehensive Review on the Boosted Effects of Anion Vacancies in Photocatalytic Solar Water Splitting: Focus on g-C3N4 with Carbon and Nitrogen Vacancies. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 8406–8436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Q.; Yue, M.; Chen, P.; Ren, Q.; Kong, W.; Jia, C.; Lu, Q.; Wu, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, W.; et al. Accelerating photocatalytic hydrogen production by anchoring Pt single atoms on few-layer g-C3N4 nanosheets with Pt–N coordination. J. Mater. Chem. C 2024, 12, 3437–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, N.; Si, X.; He, L.; Zhang, J.; Sun, Y. Strategies for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of semiconductors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 58, 1249–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, R.; Gao, T.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Luo, W.; Wu, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Engineering of bimetallic Au–Pd alloyed particles on nitrogen defects riched g-C3N4 for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 63, 1116–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, W.; Li, Y.; Zhao, P.; Zhang, L.; Dai, B.; Xu, J.; Huang, H.; He, Y.; Leung, D.Y.C. Novel Z-scheme Ag-C3N4/SnS2 plasmonic heterojunction photocatalyst for degradation of tetracycline and H2 production. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 126555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Song, T.; Zhang, X.; Xie, C.; Yang, P. N-doped carbon nanotubes enhanced charge transport between Ni nanoparticles and g-C3N4 nanosheets for photocatalytic H2 generation and 4-nitrophenol removal. Carbon 2023, 210, 118052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khan, A.W.; Lali, N.S.; Sabei, F.Y.; Irfan, M.I.; Naeem-ul-Hassan, M.; Sher, M.; Safhi, A.Y.; Alsalhi, A.; Albariqi, A.H.; Kamli, F.; et al. Sunlight-assisted green synthesis of gold nanocubes using horsetail leaf extract: A highly se-lective colorimetric sensor for Pb2+, photocatalytic and antimicrobial agent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kwon, K.C.; Suh, J.M.; Varma, R.S.; Shokouhimehr, M.; Jang, H.W. Electrocatalytic Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction: Sustainable Solutions via Single-Atom Catalysts Supported on 2D Materials. Small Methods 2019, 3, 1800492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kuang, P.; Zheng, P.; Liu, Z.; Lei, J.; Wu, H.; Li, N.; Ma, T. Embedding Au Quantum Dots in Rimous Cadmium Sulfide Nanospheres for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Small 2016, 12, 6735–6744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fang, J.; Song, G.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, W.; Gu, J.; Su, Y.; Su, H.; Guo, C.; Zhang, D. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production on three-dimensional gold butterfly wing scales/CdS nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 807–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gangadharan, D.T.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Izquierdo, R.; Ma, D. Recent advancements in plasmon-enhanced promising third-generation solar cells. Nanophotonics 2016, 6, 153–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sun, X.; Chen, Z.; Shen, Y.; Qin, H.; Yuan, H.; Lu, J.; Guo, F.; Li, C.; Shi, W. Efficient photothermal-assisted photocatalytic H2 production using carbon dots-infused g-C3N4 nanoreactors synthesized via one-step template-free thermal polymerization. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 488, 151041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. George, J.K.; Bhagat, A.; Bhaduri, B.; Verma, N. Carbon Nanofiber-Bridged Carbon Nitride-Fe2O3 Photocatalyst: Hydrogen Generation and Degradation of Aqueous Organics. Catal. Lett. 2022, 153, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Al-Ansari, S.H.; Gomaa, H.; Abdel-Rahim, R.D.; Ali, G.A.M.; Nagiub, A.M. Recycled gold-reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of crystal violet. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, Z.; Kong, C.; Lu, G. Visible Photocatalytic Water Splitting and Photocatalytic Two-Electron Oxygen Formation over Cu- and Fe-Doped g-C3N4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Z.; Dai, F.; Yin, H.; Zhang, M.; Xing, J.; Wang, L. The dual role of Au nanoparticles in the surface plasmon resonance enhanced photocatalyst Au/g-C3N4. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 2022, 48, 100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, L.; Ding, N.; Lou, L.; Iwasaki, K.; Wu, H.; Luo, Y.; Li, D.; Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A.; Meng, Q. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution via Pt@Au NRs/C3N4 Nanotubes under Visible-Light Irra-diation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 29, 1806774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tian, H.; Liu, X.; Liang, Z.; Qiu, P.; Qian, X.; Cui, H.; Tian, J. Gold nanorods/g-C3N4 heterostructures for plasmon-enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution in visible and near-infrared light. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 557, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yassin, J.M.; Taddesse, A.M.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M. Sustainable synthesis of a new semiamorphous Ti-BDC MOF material and the photocatalytic performance of its ternary composites with Ag3PO4 and g-C3N4. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 578, 151996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, Y.; Jia, H.; Yang, J.; Yin, H.; Yang, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, B. Understanding the roles of plasmonic Au nanocrystal size, shape, aspect ratio and loading amount in Au/g-C3N4hybrid nanostructures for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 22296–22307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, C.; Shao, M.; Ning, F.; Xu, S.; Li, Z.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Au nanoparticles sensitized ZnO nanorod@nanoplatelet core–shell arrays for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 2015, 12, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jiang, F.; Zhou, X.; Lv, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; Kongcharoen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, P.S. Stretchable, Breathable, and Stable Lead-Free Perovskite/Polymer Nanofiber Composite for Hybrid Triboelectric and Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2200042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, G.; Wang, X.; Cao, J.; Wu, S.; Yan, W.; Liu, G. Plasmonic Au nanoparticles embedding enhances the activity and stability of CdS for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Commun. 2015, 52, 2394–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, H.; Cao, X.; Zhang, S.; Luo, S.; Feng, L.; An, X.; Jiang, H.; Yao, S. Nano-sized aggregate Ti3C2–TiO2 supported on the surface of Ag2NCN as a Z-scheme catalyst with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. Dalton Trans. 2023, 52, 14640–14648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chen, X.; Xu, W.; Shi, Z.; Ji, Y.; Lyu, J.; Pan, G.; Zhu, J.; Tian, Y.; Li, X.; Song, H. Plasmonic gold nanorods decorated Ti3C2 MXene quantum dots-interspersed nanosheet for full-spectrum photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.; Lu, H.; Qin, F.; Wan, J.; Wu, G.; Deng, L.; Sun, Q.; Wang, X.; Yao, D.; Kan, J. Flower-shaped S-scheme CdS-ZnO nanorods heterojunction assisted with SPR of low-content Au for accelerating photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 58, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Jian, A.; Feng, K.; Jia, H.; Zhang, Q.; Sang, S.; Zhang, X. Quantitative investigation of plasmonic hot-electron injection by KPFM. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 492, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, K.L.; Yang, Y.; Farhan, S.; Wu, Y.; Lin, W.F. S-scheme p-n junction Na0.6 CoO2 /g-C3N4 heterostructure as an efficient photocatalyst for green hydrogen production: Fabrication, characterization and mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 490, 151408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction spectra of UCN and Au NPs/UCN nanocomposites at varying mass ratios; (b) UCN and Au/UCN diffraction peaks in the 2θ region of 26–30°.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction spectra of UCN and Au NPs/UCN nanocomposites at varying mass ratios; (b) UCN and Au/UCN diffraction peaks in the 2θ region of 26–30°.
Molecules 30 03406 g001
Figure 2. (a) XPS spectrum of Au/UCN, XPS spectrum of (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, and (d) Au 4f for Au/UCN.
Figure 2. (a) XPS spectrum of Au/UCN, XPS spectrum of (b) C 1s, (c) N 1s, and (d) Au 4f for Au/UCN.
Molecules 30 03406 g002
Figure 3. (a) TEM images of Au/UCN-20 (inset purple highlights: Au mapping images of Au/UCN-20); (b) HR-TEM images of Au/UCN-20.
Figure 3. (a) TEM images of Au/UCN-20 (inset purple highlights: Au mapping images of Au/UCN-20); (b) HR-TEM images of Au/UCN-20.
Molecules 30 03406 g003
Figure 4. (a) Photocurrent response of UCN and Au/UCN, (b) EIS of UCN and Au/UCN, (c) PL spectra of UCN and Au/UCN, (d) time-resolved photoluminescence decay profiles of UCN and Au/UCN.
Figure 4. (a) Photocurrent response of UCN and Au/UCN, (b) EIS of UCN and Au/UCN, (c) PL spectra of UCN and Au/UCN, (d) time-resolved photoluminescence decay profiles of UCN and Au/UCN.
Molecules 30 03406 g004
Figure 5. (a) UV–Vis DRS of UCN and Au/UCN, (b) (αhv)1/2 versus hv curves of Au/UCN.
Figure 5. (a) UV–Vis DRS of UCN and Au/UCN, (b) (αhv)1/2 versus hv curves of Au/UCN.
Molecules 30 03406 g005
Figure 6. (a) Comparative H2 evolution under broad-spectrum light exposure, (b) spectral-dependent hydrogen production rates across three wavelength ranges, (c) dual-axis representation of light absorption characteristics (DRS, red) and quantum yield (AQE, blue) for Au/UCN-20, (d) long-term stability testing of the optimal photocatalyst under sustained illumination.
Figure 6. (a) Comparative H2 evolution under broad-spectrum light exposure, (b) spectral-dependent hydrogen production rates across three wavelength ranges, (c) dual-axis representation of light absorption characteristics (DRS, red) and quantum yield (AQE, blue) for Au/UCN-20, (d) long-term stability testing of the optimal photocatalyst under sustained illumination.
Molecules 30 03406 g006
Figure 7. (a) Cross-sectional electric field mapping of UCN at λ = 900 nm (FDTD simulation); (b) dielectric property representation of Au/UCN nanocomposite; (c) 400 nm-induced electric field distribution in Au/UCN cross-section; (d) 900 nm-excited field enhancement in Au/UCN structure.
Figure 7. (a) Cross-sectional electric field mapping of UCN at λ = 900 nm (FDTD simulation); (b) dielectric property representation of Au/UCN nanocomposite; (c) 400 nm-induced electric field distribution in Au/UCN cross-section; (d) 900 nm-excited field enhancement in Au/UCN structure.
Molecules 30 03406 g007
Figure 8. (a) Surface potential mapping of Au/UCN heterostructure in dark conditions; (b) corresponding KPFM analysis under light illumination.
Figure 8. (a) Surface potential mapping of Au/UCN heterostructure in dark conditions; (b) corresponding KPFM analysis under light illumination.
Molecules 30 03406 g008
Scheme 1. Photocatalytic mechanism of Au/UCN from interfacial electric field induced by LSPR effect.
Scheme 1. Photocatalytic mechanism of Au/UCN from interfacial electric field induced by LSPR effect.
Molecules 30 03406 sch001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, H.; Wei, Z.; Gao, Q.; Qu, P.; Wang, R.; Luo, X.; Sun, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; et al. Gold Nanoparticles-Functionalized Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Boosting Solar Hydrogen Production: The Role of Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Electric Fields. Molecules 2025, 30, 3406. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163406

AMA Style

Yu H, Wei Z, Gao Q, Qu P, Wang R, Luo X, Sun X, Li D, Zhang X, Liu J, et al. Gold Nanoparticles-Functionalized Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Boosting Solar Hydrogen Production: The Role of Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Electric Fields. Molecules. 2025; 30(16):3406. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Haidong, Ziqi Wei, Qiyue Gao, Ping Qu, Rui Wang, Xuehui Luo, Xiao Sun, Dong Li, Xiao Zhang, Jiufen Liu, and et al. 2025. "Gold Nanoparticles-Functionalized Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Boosting Solar Hydrogen Production: The Role of Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Electric Fields" Molecules 30, no. 16: 3406. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163406

APA Style

Yu, H., Wei, Z., Gao, Q., Qu, P., Wang, R., Luo, X., Sun, X., Li, D., Zhang, X., Liu, J., & Feng, L. (2025). Gold Nanoparticles-Functionalized Ultrathin Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Boosting Solar Hydrogen Production: The Role of Plasmon-Induced Interfacial Electric Fields. Molecules, 30(16), 3406. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30163406

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop