Next Article in Journal
Surface-Active Ionic Liquids and Surface-Active Quaternary Ammonium Salts from Synthesis, Characterization to Antimicrobial Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Favipiravir Analogues as Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase, Combined Quantum Chemical Modeling, Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship, and Molecular Docking Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 2
10.3390/molecules29020439
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Analysis of Compounds from Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and Their Differences Using High-Resolution Liquid–Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Network Binding Antioxidant Activity

by
Dezhi Shi
1,2,
Nanxi Liao
1,2,
Hualan Liu
1,2,
Wufeng Gao
1,2,
Shaohui Zhong
1,2,
Chao Zheng
1,2,
Haijie Chen
1,
Lianlian Xiao
1,2,
Yubo Zhu
1,2,
Shiwen Huang
1,
Yunyu Zhang
1,2,
Yang Hu
1,2,
Yunfeng Zheng
1,2,
Jing Ji
1,2,* and
Jianming Cheng
1,2,*
1
College of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
2
Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Classical Prescription, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(2), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020439
Submission received: 4 January 2024 / Revised: 12 January 2024 / Accepted: 13 January 2024 / Published: 16 January 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
There is a serious mixing of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in various parts of China due to the similar traits of lianas, and there is a lack of systematic research on the compound and activity evaluation of the two. Likewise, the differences in compounds brought about by the distribution of origin also need to be investigated. In this study, high-resolution liquid–mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-Zeno-TOF-MS/MS) was used to analyze samples of Piperis Herba from five origins and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from five origins, with three batches collected from each origin. The compounds were identified based on precise molecular weights, secondary fragments, and an online database combined with node-to-node associations of the molecular network. The t-test was used to screen and analyze the differential compounds between the two. Finally, the preliminary evaluation of antioxidant activity of the two herbs was carried out using DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging assays. The results showed that a total of 72 compounds were identified and deduced in the two Chinese medicines. These compounds included 54 amide alkaloids and 18 other compounds, such as flavonoid glycosides. The amide alkaloids among them were then classified, and the cleavage pathways in positive ion mode were summarized. Based on the p-value of the t-test, 32 differential compounds were screened out, and it was found that the compounds of Piperis Herba were richer and possessed a broader spectrum of antioxidant activity, thus realizing a multilevel distinction between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. This study provides a preliminary reference for promoting standardization and comprehensive quality research of the resources of Piperis Herba using Piperis Kadsurae Caulis as a reference.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis are from Piperaceae, and they are known to expel wind dampness, open the meridians, and relieve paralyzing pain. They are widely used in the treatment of joint pain in the limbs. Modern research has found that Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis can increase coronary blood flow, which is applied to various diseases, such as coronary heart disease and angina pectoris, and has a certain protective effect on platelet-activating factor hypotension and pulmonary edema [1]. In terms of pain relief, some studies show that Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis can raise the pain threshold and that they have a good therapeutic effect on inflammatory pain [2]. It has also been found that Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis have a certain protective effect against oxidative damage in the body, and they have free radical scavenging activity at the same time [3]. The pharmacological activities of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis are very extensive and have important application prospects.
However, both herbs are climbers and have very similar traits and functions. This has resulted in a very serious mixing of the two herbs in many regions. Piperis Kadsurae Caulis is listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [4], while Piperis Herba is included in the local pharmacopoeia standards of different regions in China, with varying descriptions. It is still not included in the national standard because of many factors, such as mixed origins and varieties. Although both of them have certain effects of dispelling wind and relieving pain, there are some differences, and the mixing of the two will cause the original rational drug to lose its therapeutic effect [2]. Due to the variety and origin, the study of the two species is still relatively limited, and the compound of the two species has been studied in alkaloids [5], lignans [6] and volatile oils, but no systematic characterization of the two species has yet been found, so the identification of the differential compounds of the two species needs to be urgently resolved.
To further clarify and compare the differences in the compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, a high-resolution liquid–mass spectrometer, ZenoTOF 7600, was selected for rapid scanning and analysis. In previous studies, alkaloids were found to have significant pharmacological activities as the characteristic representative compounds of the two, but due to the similarity of their compounds and the limitation of controls, it is difficult to rapidly and accurately identify the compounds [7]. At present, the molecular network has been widely used in the rapid identification of compounds of natural medicines [8]. Compared to feature-based molecular networks, classical molecular networks retain a richer set of nodes that can provide more information and networking [9]. On the other hand, the molecular network is also able to visualize the different data collected through Cytoscape, forming a pie chart indicating the relative content and thus achieving a preliminary comparison [8]. Markview enables peak extraction, peak comparison and isotope removal for multiple batches of data, and t-tests for common peaks for multiple batches to analyze differential compounds [10]. In this experiment, we focused on the antioxidant activity of both [11], choosing the more widely used DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging assays for a preliminary comparison of the antioxidant activity of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis [12]. The above analytical methods were used in order to achieve a differential evaluation of the composition and efficacy of the multi-origin, multi-batch sources of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis.
Therefore, the present study allows for the rapid identification of differential compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and the preliminary evaluation of the antioxidant activity of both. The above study is important for accelerating the national standardization of Piperis Herba and rational compounding of the two herbs.

2. Results

2.1. Optimization of Extraction and Mass Spectrometry Conditions

The results showed that choosing the material–liquid ratio of 1:100 for the extraction of 75% methanol for 30 min allowed for detecting the majority of the substances. Considering that the alkaloid compounds were almost unresponsive in the negative ion mode, the positive ion mode was finally adopted for the collection after comparison. The results of the optimization of the conditions are presented in Supplementary Material S1.

2.2. Molecular Network Visualization and Analysis

The identified substances were subjected to molecular network visualization, and the results are shown in Figure 1. The amide alkaloids, as the main compounds in both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, were clustered into two main networks in the molecular network. The first one was dominated by the amide alkaloids containing piperidinium, isobutyl, and pyrrolidinium, which was characterized by the presence of the 1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl group; the second network was composed of fatty amide alkaloids that dominated the second cluster network; some of the long-chain fatty amides were clustered into a separate network due to their structural similarity to fatty acids; and the long-chain fatty amide alkaloids were clustered into a cluster network. The distribution of compounds in Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis can be visually compared based on the figure, so the next step is to analyze the compositional differences between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from multiple origins.
In this experiment, UPLC was firstly carried out to investigate the extraction solvents (water, 50% methanol, 75% methanol, and methanol), extraction time (15, 30, and 60 min), material–liquid ratios (1:25, 1:50, 1:100, and 1:200 w/v), and the gradient of the mobile phase (acetonitrile–water, methanol–water, acetonitrile–0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water). The results showed that choosing the material–liquid ratio of 1:100 for the extraction of 75% methanol for 30 min allowed for detecting the majority of the substances. Considering that the alkaloid compounds were almost unresponsive in the negative ion mode, the positive ion mode was finally adopted for the collection after comparison.

2.3. Identification of the Compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis

The molecular network results were processed using peakview to exclude false-positive results, and the compounds of the samples from Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were identified based on the association between nodes and nodes. A total of 72 compounds were identified, including 54 alkaloids and 18 other compounds, such as flavonoid glycosides and volatile oils. The results showed that the compounds identified in Piperis Herba from Guangxi Guilin and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Sichuan Yunlian were more representative. Figure 2 shows the total ion chromatogram (TIC) of Piperis Herba from Guangxi Guilin in the positive ion mode, and Figure 3 shows the BPCs of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Sichuan Yunlian in the positive ion mode. Detailed information regarding the identified compounds is shown in Table 1, and their corresponding structures are given in Supplementary Material S2.

2.4. Identification of the Amide Alkaloids

Amide alkaloids are the main compounds and the main active ingredients of both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. Alkaloids are mainly nitrogen-containing organic compounds, and the majority of the 54 alkaloids identified in this experiment were straight-chain amide alkaloids, including 20 isobutyl amide alkaloids, 12 piperidine amide alkaloids, and 9 pyrrolidine amide alkaloids. The cleavage modes of these amide alkaloids were mainly three types of alpha cleavage, which was characterized by the cleavage triggered by oxygen and nitrogen atoms of the acyl group and the subsequent generation of different fragments. Several α-cleavage modes of these amide alkaloids are shown in Figure 4 [30].
The amide alkaloids of the isobutyl group can be divided into two classes, of which compounds 38, 45, 52, 60, 64, 70, and 72 are fatty amide alkaloids, which are cleaved mainly by class A and B α-cleavage in Figure 4. For example, compound 38 is cleaved by the oxygen and nitrogen atoms in the amide bond, generating a fragment peak with m/z 166 (C10H16NO+) due to the neutral loss of isobutyl, followed by the α-cleavage of the carbonyl group and the loss of the alkyl fragments, generating a fragment peak with m/z 81 (C6H8+). Compound 60 has a similar cleavage pattern, with the neutral loss of either isobutyl or m/z 73 (C4H11N) generating a fragment peak with m/z 196 (C12H22NO+) or 179 (C12H19O+), or through the loss of CO followed by alkyl fragmentation to generate a fragment peak with m/z of 95 (C6H7O+). The cleavage patterns of compounds 38 and 60 are shown specifically in Figure 5, and combined with the above analyses, the identification of the remaining fatty amide alkaloids was completed through the website and based on the literature.
Compounds 18, 27, 34, 37, 40, 46, 48, 54, 58, 65, 66, 68, and 71 comprise a second class of isobutyl amido alkaloids characterized by the presence of the 1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl group and isobutylamine. These compounds also contain cleavage of the 1, 3-benzodioxol-5-yl group through the loss of CH2O to obtain a fragment ion with an m/z of 135 (C8H6O2+). Compound 34 is mainly cleaved by class A alpha cleavage to obtain a m/z of 229 (C14H13O3+), and the fragment ions with m/z of 201 (C12H9O3+), 171 (C11H7O2+), and 131 (C10H10+) were obtained through multiple rearrangements of hydrogen, respectively. On the other hand, there is also a structure containing the 1, 3-benzodioxol-5-yl group remaining after class B α-cleavage through loss of CH2O to obtain fragment ions with m/z of 135 (C8H6O2+), and the specific cleavage pattern is shown in Figure 6. Combining the two cleavage patterns, the remaining isobutyl alkaloids can be structurally characterized.
The amide alkaloids of the piperidine class, the most biologically important precursors that include the piperidinium salts, are characterized by cleavage by amide bond class B alpha cleavage to give characteristic fragment ions with m/z of 86 Da (C5H12N+), of which compounds 23, 25, 29, 30, 35, 36, 39, 47, 50, 53, 59, 61, 63, and 69 were identified as piperidine amide alkaloids. The amide alkaloids of the pyrrolidine class are similar to the amide alkaloids of the piperidine class, which include 19, 21, 24, 32, 51, 55, and 56, and their cleavage is characterized by a characteristic fragment ion with m/z of 72 (C4H10N+) via an amide bond via class B alpha cleavage, which, however, could not be detected due to the scanning range setting, but it can be identified by class A α cleavage to obtain m/z of 98 (C5H8NO+). The specific cleavage pathways exemplified by compounds 47 and 55 are indicated in Figure 7. The other piperidine and pyrrolidine alkaloids were resolved in combination with the isobutyl amide alkaloids.
The rest also include one simple amide alkaloid and three dimeric amide alkaloids, which share a similar cleavage pattern to the above alkaloids in the positive ion mode via class B alpha cleavage to produce fragment ions with an m/z of 105 Da (C7H5O+). Apophilic amide alkaloids undergo rearrangement through the loss of CH3· and CO and then undergo a rearrangement, such as compound 20, through cleavage to form fragment ions with m/z of 251 (C16H11O3+) and 195 (C14H11O+).

2.5. Analysis of the Differences in the Compounds between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis

The differential compounds between 15 batches of Piperis Herba and 15 batches of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were analyzed using a t-test, and the compounds with p < 0.05 were selected as differential compounds, from which 32 differential compounds were screened out and identified. The peak areas of the differential compounds of each batch were used as their relative contents to draw the clustering heatmap so as to achieve the intuitive description of the differential compounds of multiple batches. Among the 32 differential compounds screened, 29 alkaloids, 2 flavonoid glycosides, and 1 volatile oil compound were identified, except for compound 65, which had a higher relative content in Piperis Herba. The distribution of the differential compounds with amide alkaloids as the main compound was more abundant in Piperis Herba, and the quality of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis was less affected by the difference in origin relative to Piperis Herba. The quality of Piperis Herba from different origins was more varied than that of Piperis Herba from different origins, among which compounds 13, 18, 19, 37, and 42 had higher relative contents in Piperis Herba from Guangxi Yulin, while compounds 4 and 39 were widely distributed in Guangxi Baise. The compound from Yunnan Dali was the richest, and the compound from Guilin, Guangxi was the most abundant. The proportion of vine stems and leaves in them has some correlation. The majority of the three batches of Piperis Herba from Guangxi Guilin collected in this experiment was in the form of vine stems in S1, while a certain proportion of leaves were mixed in S2 and S3, which is possibly one of the reasons for the large differences in Piperis Herba. The results were analyzed and evaluated, and it was found that the relative content of the different compounds in Piperis Herba was higher as a whole, so it was possible to differentiate between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in terms of compounds. It was also found that the quality of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis was relatively more stable and that Piperis Herba was used as vine stems for medicine, while Piperis Herba was used as leafy vine stems for medicine. The differences that existed between the vine stems and the leaves would bring about the difference in the compound, and then the difference in the efficacy of the medicine, which provides ideas for the stability of the quality of the Piperis Herba. The results were analyzed and evaluated, and it was found that the relative contents of the differential compounds were higher in Piperis Herba, thus distinguishing Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in terms of compounds. The heatmap of the differential compounds is shown in Figure 8.
Pellitorines are found in high relative amounts in both Chinese medicines, and they have also been reported in the literature to have antipyretic, analgesic, and neuroprotective effects [6]. This suggests that this constituent may make the two Chinese medicines show similar efficacy to some extent, but it is not a differential constituent, indicating that the substance with high relative content may not be the key efficacious constituent of the drugs. The study of the differential components revealed that many of them stayed in preliminary studies. For example, with regard to Pipersintenamide, which has a certain relative content in Piperis Herba, only the structural characteristics of this component were reported, and the evaluation of its activity has not yet been retrieved [23]. For Guineensine, the relative content is higher in Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, and its neuroprotective effect has been reported in the literature [6]. These compounds suggest to some extent the therapeutic effects of our two drugs.

2.6. Results of DPPH and ABTS Free Radical Scavenging Experiments in Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis

Based on the ability to differentiate between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in terms of compounds, the antioxidant activities of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis collected from multiple origins were compared. The DPPH radical scavenging assay showed that both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis possessed significant antioxidant activities. A comparison of the antioxidant results of 15 batches of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis showed that Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Hubei Enshi (H5) had more significant antioxidant activity among the collected Piperis Kadsurae Caulis of five origins, and its activity was compared with that of Piperis Herba of various origins (P1–P5), which was found to have a wider range of antioxidant activity than that of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. The ABTS free radical scavenging assay again verified the significant antioxidant effects of both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, and a comparison of their ABTS free radical scavenging rates revealed similar antioxidant activities. Although many of the compounds are common to both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, the relative content of the compounds is quite different, and the more abundant amide alkaloids in Piperis Herba may be the basis for their more significant antioxidant activity. The comparisons of the DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis are shown in Figure 9.

3. Discussion

The present study provides a better way to differentiate between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. In the course of this study, both Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were characterized by aromatic odor and pungent taste, with Piperis Herba being more pungent, which was associated with the relatively higher content of amide alkaloids in Piperis Herba. After screening out the different compounds, we would have liked to explore the amide alkaloids plant metabolic pathway through plant metabolomics, but the metabolic pathway of this kind of compound was only slightly retrieved, and this study could not be carried out well. Considering that these are different herbal medicines, metabolomics is less used in comparisons of different drugs, so the evaluation of antioxidant activity was supplemented for preliminary validation. The limitation of this study is that there are fewer sources of origin of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis; therefore, in the subsequent study, we will collect Piperis Herba from more origins, further compare Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities, and identify Piperis Herba at multiple levels through DNA molecular identification techniques while combining gene transcriptomics, so as to standardize the medicinal herbs of Piperis Herba.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Reagents

LC-MS-grade acetonitrile was purchased from Merck KGaA (LOT: I1233229 234, Darmstadt, Germany). Deionized water was purchased from Watsons (Guangdong, China).

4.2. Collection and Preparation of Medicinal Herbs

In 2023, a total of 15 batches of Piperis Herba (Piper wallichii (Miq.) Hand.-Mazz.) and 15 batches of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis (Piper kadsura (Choisy) Ohwi) were collected. Piperis Herba were collected from Guangxi, Yunnan, and Sichuan, Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were collected from Guangxi, Fujian, Sichuan, and Hubei, and detailed information regarding the herbs is shown in Supplementary Material S3. The collected herbs were authenticated by Professor Hu Yang of the Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine.
In this experiment, UPLC was firstly carried out to investigate the extraction solvents (water, 50% methanol, 75% methanol, and methanol), extraction time (15, 30, and 60 min), material–liquid ratios (1:25, 1:50, 1:100, and 1:200 w/v), and the gradient of the mobile phase (acetonitrile–water, methanol–water, acetonitrile–0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water).
All collected samples were smashed into powders and passed through a 65-mesh sieve separately. About 0.2 g of powder was weighed separately and weighed precisely, and 20 mL of 75% (v/v) ethanol was added precisely, stoppered tightly, and weighed. Following ultrasonic treatment for 30 min (240 W, 40 KHZ), cooling to room temperature, adding 75% methanol to make up the weight loss, and centrifugation at 10,000× g for 15 min, the supernatant was taken as a backup. At the same time, an equal amount of 30 batches of sample solution was mixed to prepare the QC samples. The samples were injected and analyzed once every 10 min to determine the stability of the instrument.

4.3. UHPLC-MS Analysis

The detection was performed using a high-resolution liquid–mass spectrometer ZenoTOF 7600, and a column of XDB-C8 (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) was selected for the analysis. The column was eluted with water as mobile phase A and acetonitrile as mobile phase B in the following gradient: 0~10 min, 25–38%B; 10~16 min, 38~45%B; 16~18 min, 45~55%B; 18~22 min, 55~55%B; 22~24 min, 55~70%B; 24~26 min, 70~100%B; 26~27 min, 100~25%B; 27~30 min, 25~25%B. Flow rate 0.3 mL/min, injection volume 3 μL; column temperature 40 °C.
MS conditions in positive ion mode were set as follows: ion source temperature (TEM), 550 °C; flow rate of curtain gas (CUR), 35psi; flow rate of nebulization gas (GS1) and flow rate of auxiliary gas (GS2), 55 psi; ion spray floating voltage (ISVF), 5500 V; collision energy (CE), 35 eV; declustering potential, 100 eV. Data were acquired from 80–1250 Da for each sample. The Sample Acquisition Time was 30 min.

4.4. Molecular Network and Compound Identification Analysis

The molecular network was used for rapid identification of the compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis, and the original mass spectral files of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were imported into the MSConvert software of ProteoWizard 3.0.23199 64-bit and converted into the format of mzML, respectively. Then, the files were uploaded to the GNPS website (https://gnps.ucsd.edu/) (accessed on 2 November 2023) via WinSCP software 6.1. Molecular network analysis was performed by setting the precursor ion mass and fragment ion to 0.02 Da and the minimum cosine value to 0.07. The rest of the parameters were set according to the default settings and submitted to the molecular network run [31]. Cytoscape 3.9 was used to process the generated molecular network, and the compounds on the network were analyzed and identified.
Peakview 1.2 was used to analyze and verify the accuracy of the identification results using the GNPS molecular network, combined with secondary fragments from the literature, and to analyze the cleavage pattern of the compounds to determine the structure of the compounds. The identification of other unknown compounds was inferred based on the fragment information of MS/MS with the combination of Pubchem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) (accessed on 10 November 2023), CNKI (https://kns.cnki.net/) (accessed on 11 November 2023), SciFinder (https://scifinder.cas.org/) (accessed on 10 November 2023), and the related literature.

4.5. Analysis of the Differential Compounds in Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis

The mass spectrometry files of 30 batches of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis were imported into Markview 1.2.1. The Minimum retention time was set to 0.1 min, the Maximum retention time was set to 30 min, and the rest of the parameters were set according to the default settings of the software. Multiple batches were processed, isotope ions were removed, common peaks were analyzed, and, finally, a t-test was performed to select the substances with p < 0.05 as the differential compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. The identified differential compounds were plotted on a heatmap for visual comparison of relative contents.

4.6. Comparison of Antioxidant Activity between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis

Evaluation of antioxidant activity was carried out to determine DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging rate in 15 batches of Piperis Herba and 15 batches of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. DPPH and ABTS free radical scavenging assays were carried out based on a methodology from the literature [11,12], and a comparison was made by integrating the different origins of Piperis Herba and the origin source with the most significant antioxidant activity of the origin source of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis to achieve a differentiation between Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis in terms of antioxidant activity.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, it was found that Piperis Herba has a richer compound and a wider range of antioxidant activities than Piperis Kadsurae Caulis. These results help us to better compare the differences in compounds and activity between the herbs of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and lay an experimental foundation for further promoting the standardization and clinical application of Piperis Herba.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29020439/s1, Supplementary Material S1; Supplementary Material S2; Supplementary Material S3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation, data curation, and writing—original draft, D.S.; Investigation, N.L. and H.L.; Investigation, W.G. and C.Z.; Writing—original draft, S.Z.; Conceptualization and writing—review and editing, H.C. and Y.Z. (Yunyu Zhang); Supervision and data curation, L.X. and Y.Z. (Yubo Zhu); Supervision, Y.Z. (Yunfeng Zheng) and S.H.; Resources, Y.H.; Conceptualization, resources, and writing—review and editing, J.J. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Science and Technology Project of Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Department, grant number BK20181424.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.Q.; Geng, T.; Huang, W.Z.; Wang, Z.Z.; Xiao, W. Research progress of platelet activating factor(PAF) receptor antagonist. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2018, 43, 1392–1403. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhou, J.L.; Su, D.X.; Li, X.Z.; Xu, M.L.; Ma, X.X.; Zhuang, X.Y. Research Progress on Analgesic Effect of Piper Genus Native to Yunnan Province. Chin. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2022, 40, 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carsono, N.; Tumilaar, S.G.; Kurnia, D.; Latipudin, D.; Satari, M.H. A Review of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity Properties of Piper Species. Molecules 2022, 27, 6774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. Part I; Chemical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2020; p. 306. [Google Scholar]
  5. Nongmai, C.; Kanokmedhakul, K.; Promgool, T.; Paluka, J.; Suwanphakdee, C.; Kanokmedhakul, S. Chemical constituents and antibacterial activity from the stems and leaves of Piper wallichii. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2022, 24, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yu, L.; Hu, X.; Xu, R.; Ba, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Cao, B.; Wu, X. Amide alkaloids characterization and neuroprotective properties of Piper nigrum L.: A comparative study with fruits, pericarp, stalks and leaves. Food Chem. 2022, 368, 130832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chen, H.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Zeng, M.N.; Cao, Y.G.; Sun, P.T.; Cao, B.; Du, K.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.W.; et al. Neolignans and amide alkaloids from the stems of Piper kadsura and their neuroprotective activity. Phytochemistry 2022, 203, 113336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wasilewicz, A.; Bojkova, D.; Beniddir, M.A.; Cinatl, J.; Rabenau, H.F.; Grienke, U.; Rollinger, J.M.; Kirchweger, B. Molecular networking unveils anti-SARS-CoV-2 constituents from traditionally used remedies. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 30, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, W.; Mei, S.; Zhou, H.; Salman, F.M.; Hu, T.; Wu, T. Metabolite fingerprinting of the ripening process in Pixian douban using a feature-based molecular network and metabolomics analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 418, 135940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, C.; Yan, B.; Cai, Q.; He, H.; Duan, X.; Fan, H. Differential Analysis of Serum Principal Components Treated with Compound Sophora Decoction and Related Compounds Based on High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS). Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. eCAM 2020, 2020, 7518479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Villanueva-Bermejo, D.; Siles-Sanchez, M.L.N.; Martin, H.D.; Rodríguez, G.M.; Jaime, L.; Santoyo, S.; Fornari, T. Theoretical framework to evaluate antioxidant synergistic effects from the coextraction of marjoram, rosemary and parsley. Food Chem. 2024, 437, 137919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iordanescu, O.A.; Bala, M.; Gligor, P.D.; Zippenfening, S.E.; Cugerean, M.I.; Petroman, M.I.; Hadaruga, D.I.; Hadaruga, N.G.; Riviş, M. A DPPH· Kinetic Approach on the Antioxidant Activity of Various Parts and Ripening Levels of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) Ethanolic Extracts. Plants 2021, 10, 1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. GNPS. Available online: https://gnps.ucsd.edu/ (accessed on 2 November 2023).
  14. Hou, K.; Chen, F.; Zu, Y.; Yang, L. Ionic liquids-lithium salts pretreatment followed by ultrasound-assisted extraction of vitexin-4″-O-glucoside, vitexin-2″-O-rhamnoside and vitexin from Phyllostachys edulis leaves. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1431, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, Y.F.; He, F.; Wang, C.J.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Sang, Z.; Qiu, P.; Luo, P.; Xiao, S.Y.; Li, J.; et al. Discovery of chemical markers for improving the quality and safety control of Sinomenium acutum stem by the simultaneous determination of multiple alkaloids using UHPLC-QQQ-MS/MS. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, W.; Xu, M.; Yu, C.; Zhang, G.; Tang, X. Simultaneous determination of vitexin-4″-O-glucoside, vitex-in-2″-O-rhamnoside, rutin and vitexin from hawthorn leaves flavonoids in rat plasma by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2010, 878, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wu, F.S.; Hung, C.J.; Lin, C.L.; Chang, T.H.; Chen, C.L.; Sung, P.J.; Cheng, M.J.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, J.J. New Norneolignan and Bioactive Constituents of Clitoria ternatea. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2020, 56, 1000–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, R.H.; Yang, J.; Qi, L.W.; Xin, G.Z.; Wang, C.Z.; Yuan, C.S.; Wen, X.D.; Li, P. In vivo microdialysis with LC-MS for analysis of spinosin and its interaction with cyclosporin A in rat brain, blood and bile. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 61, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ee, G.C.; Lim, C.M.; Lim, C.K.; Rahmani, M.; Shaari, K.; Bong, C.F. Alkaloids from Piper sarmentosum and Piper nigrum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 1416–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Amin, S.A.; Bhattacharya, P.; Basak, S.; Gayen, S.; Nandy, A.; Saha, A. Pharmacoinformatics study of Piperolactam A from Piper betle root as new lead for non steroidal anti fertility drug development. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2017, 67, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Macedo, A.L.; Dos, S.T.; Valverde, A.L.; Moreira, D.L.; Vasconcelos, T.R.A. An Overview of Neolignans of the Genus Piper L.: Isolation Methods and Biological Activities. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 693–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luca, S.V.; Minceva, M.; Gertsch, J.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K. LC-HRMS/MS-based phytochemical profiling of Piper spices: Global association of piperamides with endocannabinoid system modulation. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cao, J.; Tang, T.T.; Li, Q.T.; Fang, Y.T.; Zheng, Y.F.; Ji, J.; Cheng, J.M. HPLC characterization study and determination of amide components in Piper wallichii (Miq.) Hand.-Mazz. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2022, 45, 922–926. [Google Scholar]
  24. Li, X.; Ren, J.N.; Fan, G.; Yang, S.Z.; Zhang, L.L.; Pan, S.Y. Separation and purification of nootkatone from fermentation broth of Yarrowia lipolytica with high-speed counter-current chromatography. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 59, 4487–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.H.; Goto, M.; Wang, L.T.; Hsieh, K.Y.; Morris-Natschke, S.L.; Tang, G.H.; Long, C.L.; Lee, K.H. Multidrug resistance-selective antiproliferative activity of Piper amide alkaloids and synthetic analogues. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 4818–4821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, S.W.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.; Lee, H.S.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, W.S.; Jun, C.D.; Park, J.H.; Lee, J.M.; Rho, M.C. Alkamides from the fruits of Piper longum and Piper nigrum displaying potent cell adhesion inhibition. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4544–4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, J.; Su, Y.; Luo, J.F.; Gu, W.; Niu, H.M.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Long, C.L. New amide alkaloids from Piper longum fruits. Nat. Prod. Bioprospect. 2013, 3, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dabur, R.; Mittal, A. Detection and qualitative analysis of fatty acid amides in the urine of alcoholics using HPLC-QTOF-MS. Alcohol 2016, 52, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Munigunti, R.; Nelson, N.; Mulabagal, V.; Gupta, M.P.; Brun, R.; Calderon, A.I. Identification of oleamide in Guatteria recurvisepala by LC/MS-based Plasmodium falciparum thioredoxin reductase ligand binding method. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 1749–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Meng, L.Z.; Gong, S.L.; He, Y.B.; Liu, Y. Organic Spectral Analysis, 4th ed.; Wuhan University Press: Wuhan, China, 2016; p. 63. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Y.; Xu, D.; Xing, X.; Yang, H.; Gao, W.; Li, P. The chemistry and activity-oriented characterization of isoflavones difference between roots of Pueraria lobata and P. thomsonii guided by feature-based molecular networking. Food Chem. 2023, 422, 136198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 00439 g001
Figure 1. Molecular network visualization diagram in positive ion mode.
Figure 1. Molecular network visualization diagram in positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g001
Molecules 29 00439 g002
Figure 2. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of Piperis Herba from Guangxi Guilin in the positive ion mode.
Figure 2. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of Piperis Herba from Guangxi Guilin in the positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g002
Molecules 29 00439 g003
Figure 3. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Sichuan Yunlian in the positive ion mode.
Figure 3. The total ion chromatogram (TIC) of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Sichuan Yunlian in the positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g003
Molecules 29 00439 g004
Figure 4. Schematic representation of three cleavage modes of amide alkaloids in positive ion mode. A (acyl carbon atom initiated α-cleavage), B (acyl nitrogen atom initiated α-cleavage) and C (γ-hydrogen rearrangement).
Figure 4. Schematic representation of three cleavage modes of amide alkaloids in positive ion mode. A (acyl carbon atom initiated α-cleavage), B (acyl nitrogen atom initiated α-cleavage) and C (γ-hydrogen rearrangement).
Molecules 29 00439 g004
Molecules 29 00439 g005
Figure 5. Possible cleavage pathway for compounds 38 and 60 in positive ion mode.
Figure 5. Possible cleavage pathway for compounds 38 and 60 in positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g005
Molecules 29 00439 g006
Figure 6. Possible cleavage pathway for compound 34 in positive ion mode.
Figure 6. Possible cleavage pathway for compound 34 in positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g006
Molecules 29 00439 g007
Figure 7. Possible cleavage pathway for compounds 47 and 55 in positive ion mode.
Figure 7. Possible cleavage pathway for compounds 47 and 55 in positive ion mode.
Molecules 29 00439 g007
Molecules 29 00439 g008
Figure 8. Heatmap of differential compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis.
Figure 8. Heatmap of differential compounds of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis.
Molecules 29 00439 g008
Molecules 29 00439 g009
Figure 9. DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) antioxidant activity of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis ( x ¯ ± s, n = 3), Annotations: Compare with H5, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. Note: H5 is three batches of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Hubei Enshi. P1–P5 are individuals of three batches of Piperis Herba from different origins.
Figure 9. DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) antioxidant activity of Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis ( x ¯ ± s, n = 3), Annotations: Compare with H5, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005. Note: H5 is three batches of Piperis Kadsurae Caulis from Hubei Enshi. P1–P5 are individuals of three batches of Piperis Herba from different origins.
Molecules 29 00439 g009
Table 1. Identification of 72 compounds in Piperis Herba (S1) and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis (H1).
Table 1. Identification of 72 compounds in Piperis Herba (S1) and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis (H1).
NO.tR
min		Molecular Formula[M+H]+Error
(ppm)		MS2CompoundS1H1Ref.
10.66C10H19NO7266.12360.8248.1128, 230.1024, 182.0824D-1-[(3-Carboxypropyl)amino]-1-deoxyfructose++[13]
20.73C10H13NO2180.1017−1163.0751, 145.0651, 115.05501-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-6,7-diol++[13]
30.95C19H21NO2296.1643−0.9265.1218(-)-Nuciferine−+[13]
40.96C27H30O15595.1653−0.7433.1128, 415.1017, 313.0700Vitexia-Glucoside++[14]
50.96C10H10O3179.0696−3.7147.0441, 119.0491Coniferyl aldehyde++[13]
60.97C25H27NO10502.1699−1.7337.1072, 305.0804, 201.05492-[[(E)-3-[2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-(hydroxymethyl)-7-methoxy-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-5-yl]prop-2-enoyl]amino]pentanedioic acid++[13]
70.98C17H19NO3286.1434−1.2237.0907, 107.0500Coclaurine++[15]
80.98C21H24O5221.1898−0.8219.1062, 151.0781, 135.0441Isodihydrofutoquinol B−+[13]
91C27H30O14579.1702−1.2433.1124Vitexin-2-O-rhamnoside+−[16]
101.06C19H23NO4330.1695−1.5192.1016, 137.0592Reticuline++[17]
111.1C20H23NO4342.1697−0.8311.1264, 265.0864Isocorydine++[13]
121.12C28H32O15609.1813−0.1447.1292, 429.1188, 327.0854Spinosin+−[18]
131.16C21H20O10433.1127−0.5313.0710, 283.0604Vitexin+−[14]
142.43C11H16O3197.1171−0.8179.1061, 133.1008, 105.0696Loliolid++[13]
152.85C17H17NO3284.1281−0.2284.1298, 147.0485, 121.0656Paprazine++[19]
164.73C38H40N2O10685.2752−0.6548.1907, 520.1955, 351.0863(1R,2S)-7-hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-2-N,3-N-bis[2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-6,8-dimethoxy-1,2-dihydronaphthalene-2,3-dicarboxamide++[13]
175.15C18H20N2O2297.1596−0.5176.1158, 175.1251, 105.0421N-(4-benzamidobutyl)benzamide+−[13]
185.51C14H15NO3246.11250175.0384, 145.0281, 98.05971-(3-(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl)pyrrolidine++[13]
196.21C14H15NO3246.11250175.0380, 145.0276, 117.0337(2E,4E)-5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N,N-dimethylpenta-2,4-dienamide++[13]
207.22C16H11NO3266.0807−1.6266.0811, 251.0577, 195.0687Piperolactam A++[20]
217.29C14H17NO2232.1331−0.5232.1361, 161.0624, 133.0646Piperlotine A++[21]
228.38C17H13NO4296.0916−0.4281.0681, 263.0570, 207.0673Piperolactam D++[19]
239.5C15H17NO3260.12810175.0482, 145.0375, 86.0974Ilepcimide++[13]
249.53C16H17NO3272.1276−0.9201.0542, 135.0448, 86.0947Piperyline++[6]
2511.78C19H25NO4332.1855−0.5135.0436, 86.0962(2E,4E)-1-piperidin-1-yl-5-(2,3,4-trimethoxyphenyl)penta-2,4-dien-1-one++[13]
2612.14C23H31NO4386.2323−0.8225.1273, 135.0440, 86.0990(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-[1-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]methanol+−[13]
2712.18C16H19NO3274.1436−0.7274.1435, 201.0544,Piperlonguminine++[6]
2812.62C16H35NO2274.2738−0.8256.2624, 106.0862Lauryldiethanolamine++[13]
2913.03C17H21NO3288.1592−0.8135.0437Piperanine++[6]
3013.16C17H19NO3286.1434−0.9201.057, 86.0963Piperine++[6]
3113.27C18H39NO3318.3001−0.7318.3051, 300.2885Phytosphingosine++[13]
3213.76C18H21NO3300.15950.1161.0594, 131.0493, 103.0557(2E,4E)-7-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-pyrrolidin-1-ylhepta-2,4-dien-1-one++[13]
3316.18C16H14O4271.0962−0.9121.0232(E)-1-(4-hydroxy-2-methoxyphenyl)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)prop-2-en-1-one−+[13]
3416.45C18H23NO3302.1750−0.4161.0682, 131.0579, 103.0621Futoamide++[22]
3517.12C19H21NO3312.1592−0.7169.0643, 131.0495, 86.0985Piperettine++[13]
3617.33C19H23NO3314.1749−0.6161.0676, 131.0575, 86.1027Pipersintenamide++[23]
3717.83C18H25NO3304.1906−0.3203.1064, 135.0449, 123.0438Pipercallosidine++[13]
3817.93C14H23NO222.1851−0.9151.1115, 81.0343Spilanthol++[23]
3918.65C19H25NO3316.1907−0.1135.0469, 86.0971Piperolein A++[6]
4018.85C20H25NO3328.1907−0.1229.1249, 135.0484Retrofractamide A++[6]
4118.87C22H28O5373.20100.1151.0843, 139.0774Galgravin−+[13]
4219.08C15H22O219.1742−0.8163.1135, 93.0702, 81.0714Nootkatone++[24]
4319.12C18H32O2281.2472−1133.1006, 105.0690, 91.0538Linoleic acid+−[13]
4419.39C18H39NO2302.3051−0.8284.2922, 106.0855, 88.0759Tetradecyldiethanolamine++[13]
4519.55C14H25NO224.2007−0.9151.1123, 133.1007, 81.0534Pellitorine++[6]
4620.13C20H27NO3330.20640.1229.1235, 135.0450Retrofractamide C++[22]
4720.17C21H25NO3340.1905−0.6227.1070, 131.0490, 86.0962Dehydropipernonaline++[22]
4820.55C20H29NO3332.2219−0.4135.0443(E)-9-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-(2-methylpropyl)non-8-enamide++[13]
4920.7C32H30N2O4507.2275−0.6256.1321, 238.1221, 105.0331Asperphenamate++[13]
5021.09C21H27NO3342.2062−0.4229.1221, 135.0459, 86.0969Pipernonaline++[22]
5121.31C22H27NO3354.2061−0.7135.0438, 131.0485(2E,4E,10E)-11-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-pyrrolidin-1-ylundeca-2,4,10-trien-1-one++[13]
5221.69C15H27NO238.2164−0.8168.1384, 81.0697(2E,4E)-N-Isobutylundeca-2,4-dienamide++[13]
5322.34C21H29NO3344.2220−0.1135.0468, 112.0754, 86.0969Piperolein B++[6]
5422.66C22H29NO3356.2220−0.2135.0430, 131.0481Retrofractamide B++[6]
5522.72C16H27NO250.2164−0.7124.0754, 98.0599(2E,4E)-1-(1-Pyrrolidinyl)-2,4-dodecadien-1-one++[25]
5623.14C22H29NO3356.2220−0.2135.0450, 131.0489, 98.0606(4E,10E)-11-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-pyrrolidin-1-ylundeca-4,10-dien-1-one++[13]
5723.62C29H39N3O2462.31170.4406.2469, 338.1844, 198.1271Echinulin++[13]
5824.18C22H31NO3358.23770.2161.0597, 135.0449Piperchabamide D++[26]
5924.27C23H29NO3368.2216−1.2225.1358, 135.0444, 86.0968Piperundecalidine++[22]
6024.38C16H29NO252.2321-0.3196.1694, 179.1435, 95.0851(2E,4E)-N-(2-methylpropyl)dodeca-2,4-dienamide++[6]
6124.98C23H31NO3370.2376−0.3135.0437, 131.0494, 86.0962Piperchabamide B+−[6]
6225.02C20H42O5363.3104−0.2195.1213, 133.08503,6,9,12-Tetraoxatetracosan-1-ol++[13]
6325.26C17H29NO264.2320−0.8112.0754, 86.0963(2E,4E)-N-dodecadienoylpiperidine+−[27]
6425.44C17H31NO266.2476−1112.0749, 95.0849(2E,4E)-N-ethyl-3,7,11-trimethyldodeca-2,4-dienamide++[13]
6525.5C24H33NO3384.2532−0.3283.1693, 135.0469, 86.0987Guineensine++[6]
6625.5C23H33NO3372.2530−0.9135.0438, 86.0964(2E,11E)-12-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N-(2-methylpropyl)dodeca-2,11-dienamide+−[6]
6725.79C19H32O2293.2474−0.5243.2090, 137.1314Methyl alpha-eleostearate++[6]
6825.83C24H35NO3386.2686−0.9313.1802, 135.0439(2E,4E)-5-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-N,N-dihexylpenta-2,4-dienamide+−[6]
6925.93C25H33NO3396.2530−0.9135.0438, 131.0485, 86.0960Piperchabamide C+−[6]
7025.99C16H33NO256.2632−1.3102.0910, 88.0756Palmitamide++[28]
7126.33C26H37NO3412.2845−0.3339.1948, 135.0435, 86.0960Brachystamide B++[6]
7226.33C18H35NO282.2789−1265.2513, 247.2419, 149.1321Oleamide++[29]
Note: “+” indicates that the substance has been identified. “−” indicates that the substance has not been identified.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, D.; Liao, N.; Liu, H.; Gao, W.; Zhong, S.; Zheng, C.; Chen, H.; Xiao, L.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, S.; et al. Rapid Analysis of Compounds from Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and Their Differences Using High-Resolution Liquid–Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Network Binding Antioxidant Activity. Molecules 2024, 29, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020439

AMA Style

Shi D, Liao N, Liu H, Gao W, Zhong S, Zheng C, Chen H, Xiao L, Zhu Y, Huang S, et al. Rapid Analysis of Compounds from Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and Their Differences Using High-Resolution Liquid–Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Network Binding Antioxidant Activity. Molecules. 2024; 29(2):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Dezhi, Nanxi Liao, Hualan Liu, Wufeng Gao, Shaohui Zhong, Chao Zheng, Haijie Chen, Lianlian Xiao, Yubo Zhu, Shiwen Huang, and et al. 2024. "Rapid Analysis of Compounds from Piperis Herba and Piperis Kadsurae Caulis and Their Differences Using High-Resolution Liquid–Mass Spectrometry and Molecular Network Binding Antioxidant Activity" Molecules 29, no. 2: 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29020439

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop