Next Article in Journal
Predicting pKa Values of Para-Substituted Aniline Radical Cations vs. Stable Anilinium Ions in Aqueous Media
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of Activated Sludge Augmentation on Its Ability to Degrade Paracetamol
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 29
Issue 19
10.3390/molecules29194521
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Optical and Acoustic Parameters and Surface Tensions of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea in Binary Mixtures with Different Organic Solvents between (293.15 and 323.15) K

by
Florinela Sirbu
1,*,
Alina Catrinel Ion
2,* and
Ion Ion
2
1
“Ilie Murgulescu” Institute of Physical Chemistry of Romanian Academy, Department of Chemical Thermodynamics, 202 Splaiul Independentei Str., 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnologies, National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu Str., 011061 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2024, 29(19), 4521; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194521
Submission received: 25 August 2024 / Revised: 21 September 2024 / Accepted: 22 September 2024 / Published: 24 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Nanochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the present investigations, the density, refractive index and speed of sound for pure organic solvents and binary liquid mixtures of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea between (293.15 and 323.15) K temperatures have been measured up to the solubility limit. From these experimental results, the acoustic impedance, the isentropic compressibility coefficient, the space-filling factor, the specific refraction, the relaxation strength, the intermolecular free length, the surface tension, the solubility and the solvation number of triclocarban in six organic solvents, namely ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide have been computed. The studied acoustic and optical parameters and surface tension behavior versus temperature in pure solvents and binary mixtures were useful in understanding the nature and the extent of interaction between the solute and solvent molecules. The results also show the presence of higher degree of interaction between triclocarban and nitrogen-containing solvents in comparison with other solvents. The distribution of triclocarban in water/organic solvent mixtures is frequently encountered in wastewater treatment plants.

1. Introduction

Study of the thermophysical parameters of environmental contaminants in different organic solvents contributes to understanding of physicochemical behavior in liquid mixtures. The study of miscibility and the molecular interactions in liquid solvent mixtures are useful in industrial, biological and environmental processes, with a high practical importance [1,2,3].
The 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea compound, known by the name of triclocarban (TCC), is a synthetic antibacterial agent used in very low concentrations as an antiseptic in cosmetic and health consumer products [4,5,6]. Having a low solubility in water, triclocarban can be introduced into all manufactured products only dissolved in organic solvents [7,8]. Triclocarban has begun to be considered one of the contaminants whose presence must be detected and quantified above certain limits in aqueous polluted media in the last years [1,9]. A special interest is worth noting in the study of the thermodynamic behavior of mixtures containing TCC and organic solvents, which are important in the processes of TCC detection and elimination from polluted water environments [1,9,10,11,12]. The available experimental studies regarding TCC dissolution in organic solvents [3,10,11,12,13] are very few, even if the interactions of this environmental contaminant with organic solvents [14,15] give information about solubility/miscibility, important in the risk characterization of emerging pollutants in environmental matrices [16,17]. The applied technologically and economically effective and feasible methods for the removal of contaminants from industrial wastewater systems include precipitation, solvent extraction, biodegradation, chemical oxidation, evaporation, membrane filtration, ion-exchange, carbon adsorption and electrochemical approaches [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Although the number of studies in the literature on TCC in solvents mixtures is increasing [4,18], there is still a lack of experimental data on their thermophysical and acoustical behavior and on the description of molecular interactions between solute and solvent [4]. Triclocarban is a hydrophobic compound whose molecule presents stronger interactions with certain functional groups from organic solvents, causing higher degrees of interaction and better solubilities. Its solubility was studied in different organic solvents, like alcohols (ROHs), chloroform and heptane, at different temperatures [26,27].
The chemical solubility and partitioning behavior are key input parameters in most organic contaminant environmental fate and transport models used to screen chemicals for human and environmental health risks. Measured values of TCC solubility and Kow from the literature present important differences, based on the methods of determination [18,28,29].
In this work, as a continuation of our previous liquid mixtures studies [30,31,32,33,34], we evaluate the density, refractive index and speed of sound of TCC contaminant in six organic solvents, namely Ethyl alcohol (EA), n-Propyl alcohol (nP), n-Butyl alcohol (nB), Tetrahydrofuran (THF), N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) and N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMA), for which experimental data are not available. Experimental data were measured close to the solubility limit in pure solvents and in binary mixtures at seven temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K and at ambient pressure.
From measured experimental data, the acoustic impedance (Z), the isentropic compressibility coefficient (κS), the space-filling factor (S), the specific refraction (rD), the relaxation strength (r), the intermolecular free length (Lf), the surface tension (σ), the modified surface tension (σmod) and the solvation number (Sn) of triclocarban in all the studied organic solvents have been computed and then correlated, as a function of temperature for pure solvents and binary solutions, by polynomial-type equations.
The behavior of the acoustic and optical parameters and of the surface tension at the studied temperatures was useful in understanding the nature and the extent of interaction between the unlike molecules of solute and solvents.
Thus, the present study on the thermophysical, optical and surface tension properties in binary mixtures of TCC and six organic solvents are very important for these applications in the manufacturing process of personal care products in the cosmetic industry [35].

2. Results

2.1. Tables and Figures

The measured values of densities, speeds of sound and refractive indices for pure Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide organic solvents are presented in Table 1 for all temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K compared with values available in the literature, at 298.15 K [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92], together with the standard and combined uncertainties, which affected the experimental measurements for density (ρ), refractive index (nD) and speed of sound (u), respectively.
The values of density, refractive index, speed of sound and solvation number are presented in Table 2, together with the X1 molar fraction of TCC and the specific estimated uncertainties.
In Table 3, the acoustic impedance, the isentropic compressibility coefficient, the space-filling factor, the specific refraction, the relaxation strength, the intermolecular free length and the surface tension for TCC-solvents binary mixtures are presented.
Table 4 shows the physicochemical parameters of TCC in organic solvents solubility (s) and (KOW) values at 298.15 K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa

2.2. Formatting of Mathematical Components

The molal solvation number was calculated from binary mixtures and pure solvent isentropic compressibility data using the following equation [93]:
Sn = n2/n1 (1 − κ/κ0)
where:
  • Sn—solvation number of binary mixture;
  • n2—the number of moles of solvent in the sample;
  • n1—the number of moles of solute in the sample;
  • κ—isentropic compressibility of binary mixture;
  • κ0—isentropic compressibility of pure solvent.
The molal solvation number is presented in Table 2 and Figure 1.
The following thermodynamic acoustical and optical properties were estimated using the standard relations. The acoustic impedance (Z) was calculated using the following relation [94]:
Z = ρ u
where:
  • ρ—the density (kg·m−3) in the mixture;
  • u—the speed of sound (m·s−1) in the mixture.
The κS isentropic compressibility coefficient for the pure solvent and binary mixtures has been calculated from the density data and the speed of sound using the Laplace relation [95].
κS = 1/ρ u2
The space-filling factor (S) was estimated from refractive index data (sodium D line) using the following relation, according to the method of Gerecze [96] and Lorentz–Lorenz [97,98]:
S = (nD2 − 1)/(nD2 + 2)
where nD is the refractive index of the binary solution.
The specific refraction (rD) was computed from the density and space-filling factor (S) values using the Lorentz and Lorenz equation [87]:
rD = (1/ρ) (nD2 − 1)/(nD2 + 2)
The relaxation strength (r) was estimated using the following relation [98]:
r = 1 − u2/uct2
where:
  • u—the speed of sound in the experimental solution;
  • uct—a constant with a value of 1600 m∙s−1 [99].
The intermolecular free length of liquids was calculated from compressibility values of binary mixtures, with and without TCC, with following empirical relation [100,101,102]:
Lf = K′ κS0.5
where:
  • K′—a temperature dependent constant, with the name Jacobson’s constant [101]:
  • K′ = (93.875 + 0.375 T) 10−8
  • T—absolute temperature;
  • κS—the isentropic compressibility in binary mixtures.
Surface tension and modified surface tension for the studied binary mixtures, with and without TCC, have been calculated from density and speed of sound data with the equations [35,103]:
σ = 6.3 10−4 ρ u3/2
σmod = 10−4 T1/3 ρ u3/2
where:
  • ρ—density;
  • u—speed of sound;
  • T—absolute temperature;
From the TCC solubility of the prepared samples of TCC with six organic solvents, using back-calculation, KOW (the octanol/water partition constant, reflecting the lipophilicity or hydrophobicity of an organic compound), is estimated from the below equation [16]:
log (s) = 0.693 − 0.96 log (Kow) − 0.0092 (tm − 25) − 0.00314 MTCC
where:
  • s—solubility from prepared samples, measured in [mol L−1];
  • tm—the TCC melting point; tm = 250 °C;
  • MTCC—the TCC molecular mass; MTCC = 313.58 [g mol−1].
The values for s solubility and KOW constant of the physicochemical parameters are presented in the Table 4.

3. Discussion

The obtained experimental data of thermophysical properties (Table 1) for Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide pure solvents used in binary mixtures with TCC solute were in agreement with the literature [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92].
The values of density, refractive index and speed of sound (Table 2) are observed to decrease by increasing temperature and by adding TCC solute to the mixture. The density variation is in following order: EA < nP < nB < THF < DMA < DMF, similarly with the variation in the speed of sound. The density for binary mixtures is higher than for pure solvents.
The refractive index values increase for pure DMF and DMA solvents versus refractive index values in binary mixtures. The structural influences of organic solvents over the molecules of environmental contaminants may be explained in this context based on the different variations in refractive indices.
From Table 2 and Figure 1, the solvation number values are found to decrease for nP and nB and increase by increasing temperature for the other four solvents.
The Sn variation of TCC in organic solvents is the following: THF < nB < DMF < nP < EA < DMA. The lower Sn values obtained may be due to a reduced interaction of TCC solute with the solvent.
The change in the isentropic compressibility coefficient is only due to the variation in the structural arrangement of the molecules because this depends only on the speed of sound and on the density of the solution and not on the temperature [35].
The values of the adiabatic compressibility are positive, indicating that the bulk solvent molecules are poorly compressible in comparison with the solvent molecules present around the primary and secondary solvation shell of TCC, inducing weak interactions [104,105,106].
Table 3 shows that by increasing the addition of TCC and by increasing temperature, the κS isentropic compressibility coefficient, r relaxation strength and Lf intermolecular free length are observed to increase, but the Z acoustic impedance and the S space-filling factor decrease in the mixture.
The change observed in Z by adding TCC is attributed to a change in the speed of sound in the mixture. This behavior is due to the association of the molecules and the formation of molecular aggregates.
The change in Z and S with temperature and the adding of the TCC compound may be interpreted in terms of an increase in intermolecular forces and a subsequent decrease in the relaxation of the molecules.
The intermolecular free length (Lf) of liquids is the distance between the surfaces of neighboring molecules, a very important parameter for the investigation of the nature and strength of the interactions [107].
Table 3 and Figure 2 show that the intermolecular free length (Lf) values increase with increasing temperature for all binary systems, in the following order:
DMA < DMF < THF < nB < nP < EA.
The behavior for κS and Lf is similar, in the same order.
The intermolecular free length (Lf) values for binary mixtures are less than the Lf for pure solvents. The increase in Lf implies an increase in the number of free ions showing the occurrence of ionic dissociation [108,109].
The values of surface tension and modified surface tension for the studied temperatures are presented in Table 3 and Figure 3.
The surface tension decreased linearly with increasing temperature [110,111]. As the temperature increases, the molecules of the solute and solvent are weakly bound and the kinetic energy of the molecules increases, resulting in a decrease in the cohesive forces between the molecules.
Surface tension increases for binary mixtures with the adding of TCC solute because of intermolecular separation, which appears by diluting the sample, resulting in stronger interactions based on intermolecular forces between functional groups from triclocarban and those of the studied solvents [12,112,113]. Surface tension in binary mixtures varies in the following order: Ethyl alcohol (EA) < n-Propyl alcohol (nP) < n-Butyl alcohol (nB) < Tetrahydrofuran (THF) < N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) < N,N-Dimethylacetamide (DMA). The modified surface tension varies in a similar way with the surface tension for all samples at all temperatures.
Table 4 presents the behavior of the (s) solubility and (KOW) constants of TCC in organic solvents at 298.15 K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa. The two s and KOW obtained physicochemical parameters show the importance of the solubility experimental data for characterizations of bioavailability and bioaccumulation [18,28,114,115,116] potential between TCC solute and studied organic solvents.
Chemical solubility and partitioning behavior are key input parameters in many transport models of environmental organic contaminants. These are used to screen chemicals for human and environmental health risks. Measured values of TCC solubility and Kow from the literature [18,28,114,115,116] present important differences, based on the methods of determination. It is very important to study the kinetics of the process before measuring in order to obtain the equilibrium concentration of the TCC in the studied solvents.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

The Triclocarban (TCC) Contaminant Was Provided by Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). The organic Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol and n-Butyl alcohol solvents have been supplied by Sigma Aldrich, the solvent N,N-Dimethylformamide from Merck, and Tetrahydrofuran and N,N-Dimethylacetamide were supplied by Fluka Chemie AG (Buchs, Switzerland), as presented in Table 5. All compounds were used without any pre-treatment because of their mass fraction purity higher than 0.95. The details of the chemicals used for sample preparation are presented in Table 1. The TCC/solvent experimental solutions were prepared by weight at a temperature of 298.15 K to a volume of approx. 25 g each, for reducing errors. The TCC solute needed for each sample was weighed with a Mettler-Toledo microbalance with a precision of ±2 × 10−6 g.

4.2. Apparatus and Measurement Procedure

The experimental data for density and speed of sound of the pure solvents and binary mixtures were measured with an Anton Paar DSA 5000 digital (Wien, Austria) “Density and Sound Velocity Analyzer”, with a precision of ±10−6 g·cm−3. The temperature of the sample during the density measurements was controlled with a precision of ±10−3 K, with several Peltier units being used. The density and speed of sound values obtained for air and twice distilled, de-ionized and degassed water by calibration were reproducible within ±5 × 10−6 g·cm−3 and ±5 × 10−2 m·s−1, respectively. The specific conductance for water used for calibration was 5 × 10−5 S·m−1 at 298.15 K, according to the recommendations of the manufacturer.
Refractive indices of pure solvents and binary mixtures at the six temperatures were measured at sodium D-line, λD = 589.3 nm, using a digital automatic refractometer (Anton Paar RXA 170, Wien, Austria) with a precision of ±0.01 K in temperature and of ±0.000001 for refractive index. The refractometer was calibrated with the certified reference liquid (CRM) tetrachloroethylene and was further checked out by measuring the refractive index of doubly distilled, deionized water at atmospheric pressure. The obtained value for water refractive index was 1.33249 at 298.15 K, in good agreement with the literature [69,117].

5. Conclusions

The present study reports new experimental measurements of the ρ density, nD refractive index and u speed of sound of binary mixtures in six different organic solvents, with and without TCC, at seven different temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K, and at atmospheric pressure.
The obtained experimental results were used to calculate derived parameters such as acoustic impedance, isentropic compressibility coefficient, space-filling factor, specific refraction, relaxation strength, intermolecular free length, surface tension, solubility and solvation number
It is also observed that the derived estimated parameters for the binary mixtures containing TCC, an emerging environmental pollutant, behave similarly the pure organic solvents.
The trends in the variation in the optical and acoustic parameters and surface tensions indicate the existence of positive molecular interactions between the 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea contaminant and the organic solvents from the studied binary mixtures.
The variations in the computed parameters also show a higher degree of interaction between 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea and nitrogen-containing solvents such as N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide compared to mixtures containing the others studied solvents.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, F.S.; writing—review and editing, F.S., A.C.I. and I.I.; visualization, A.C.I. and I.I.; supervision, A.C.I. and I.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This contribution was carried out within the research program “Chemical Thermodynamics and Kinetics. Quantum chemistry” of the “Ilie Murgulescu” Institute of Physical Chemistry, financed by the Romanian Academy (RA). The financial support of the EU (ERDF) and Romanian Government, for the acquisition of the research infrastructure under Project INFRANANOCHEM-Nr. 19/01.03.2009.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yun, H.; Liang, B.; Kong, D.; Li, X.; Wang, A. Fate, risk and removal of triclocarban: A critical review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 387, 121944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gaviria-Castillo, A.C.; Artunduaga-Tole, J.D.; Rodríguez-Rubiano, J.D.; Zuñiga-Andrade, J.A.; Delgado, D.R.; Jouyban, A.; Martínez, F. Solution thermodynamics and preferential solvation of triclocarban in {1,4-dioxane (1) + water (2)} mixtures at 298.15 K. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2019, 57, 55–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Holguín, A.R.; Delgado, D.R.; Martínez, F. Thermodynamic study of the solubility of triclocarban in ethanol + propylene glycol mixtures. Química Nova 2012, 35, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Delgado, D.R.; Holguin, A.R.; Martínez, F. Solution thermodynamics of triclosan and triclocarban in some volatile organic solvents. Vitae 2012, 19, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Breneman, D.L.; Hanifin, J.M.; Berge, C.A.; Kewick, B.H.; Neumann, P.B. The effect of antibacterial soap with 1.5% triclocarban on Staphylococcus aureus in patients with atopic dermatitis. Cutis 2000, 66, 296–300. [Google Scholar]
  6. Luby, S.; Agboatwalla, M.; Feikin, D.; Painter, J.; Billhimer, W.; Altaf, A.; Hoekstra, R.M. Effect of handwashing on child health: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005, 366, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vimalkumar, K.; Seethappan, S.; Pugazhendhi, A. Fate of Triclocarban (TCC) in aquatic and terrestrial systems and human exposure. Chemosphere 2019, 230, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Delgado, D.R.; Sosnik, A.; Martínez, F. Transfer thermodynamics of triclosan from water to organic solvents with different hydrogen bonding capability. Lat. Am. J. Pharm 2011, 30, 459–466. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dar, O.I.; Aslam, R.; Pan, D.; Sharma, S.; Andotra, M.; Kaur, A.; Jia, A.-Q.; Faggio, C. Source, bioaccumulation, degradability and toxicity of triclosan in aquatic environments: A review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 25, 10212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Agredo-Collazos, J.J.; Ortiz, C.P.; Cerquera, N.E.; Cardenas-Torres, R.E.; Delgado, D.R.; Peña, M.Á.; Martínez, F. Equilibrium solubility of triclocarban in (cyclohexane + 1,4-dioxane) mixtures: Determination, correlation, thermodynamics and preferential solvation. J. Solut. Chem. 2022, 51, 1603–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cruz-González, A.M.; Vargas-Santana, M.S.; Polania-Orozco, S.d.J.; Ortiz, C.P.; Cerquera, N.E.; Martínez, F.; Delgado, D.R.; Jouyban, A.; Acree, W.E., Jr. Thermodynamic analysis of the solubility of triclocarban in ethylene glycol + water mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 325, 115222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Munoz-Ortiz, C.A.; Cerquera, N.E.; Camacho, J.K.C.; Osorio-Gallego, J.; Cárdenas-Torres, R.E.; Herrera, M.; Delgado, D.R. Preferential solvation of triclocarban in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone + water cosolvent mixtures according to the Inverse Kirkwood-Buff Integrals (IKBI) method and correlation of solubility by means of some mathematical models. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Químico-Farm. 2024, 53, 219–243. [Google Scholar]
  13. Delgado, D.R.; Mogollon-Waltero, E.M.; Ortiz, C.P.; Peña, M.; Almanza, O.A.; Martínez, F.; Jouyban, A. Enthalpy-entropy compensation analysis of the triclocarban dissolution process in some {1,4-dioxane (1) + water (2)} mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 271, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Montoya Bautista, C.V.; Mohamed, B.A.; Li, L.Y. Sludge-based activated carbon from two municipal sewage sludge precursors for improved secondary wastewater-treatment discharge-effluent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aolin, H.; Quin, L.; Zhu, S.; Hu, X.; Yin, D. Combined effects of pH and dissolved organic matter on the availability of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aqueous environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 929, 172637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, S.; Wang, N.; Ma, S.; Hu, X.; Kang, L.; Yu, Y. Parabens and triclosan in shellfish from Shenzhen coastal waters: Bioindication of pollution and human health risks. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Crini, E.; Lichtfouse, G.; Wilson, L.D.; Morin Crini, N. Conventional and non conventional adsorbents for wastewater treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 195–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Snyder, E.H.; O’Connor, G.A.; McAvoy, D.C. Measured physicochemical characteristics and biosolids-borne concentrations of the antimicrobial Triclocarban (TCC). Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408, 2667–2673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Volesky, B. Biosorption of Metals; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  20. Harvey, P.J.; Campanella, B.F.; Castro, P.M.; Harms, H.; Lichtfouse, E.; Schäfner, A.R.; Smrcek, S.; Werck-Reichhart, D. Phytoreme-diation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons, anilines and phenols. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2002, 9, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Crini, G.; Badot, P.M. Traitement Et Épuration Des Eaux Industrielles Polluées; PUFC: Besançon, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cox, M.; Négré, P.; Yurramendi, L. Industrial Liquid Efuents; INASMET Tecnalia: San Sebastian, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sharma, S.K. Green Chemistry for Dyes Removal from Wastewater; Scrivener Publishing LLC Wiley: Beverley, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  24. Morin-Crini, N.; Crini, G. Eaux Industrielles Contaminées; PUFC: Besançon, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller, T.R.; Colquhoun, D.R.; Halden, R.U. Identification of wastewater bacteria involved in the degradation of triclocarban and its non-chlorinated congener. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 766–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aragón, D.M.; Sosnik, A.; Martínez, F. Solution thermodynamics of triclocarban in organic solvents of different hydrogen bonding capability. J. Sol. Chem. 2009, 38, 1493–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lim, J.; Jang, S.; Kim, H.; Cho, H.K.; Shin, M.S. Solubility of triclocarban in pure alkanols at different temperatures. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 30, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Weise, K.; Beil, S.; Schwanebeck, K.; Ion, A.C.; Berendonk, T.U.; Jungmann, D. An informative short-term study on the impacts of a triclocarban/weathered multi-walled carbon nanotube-adsorbed complex to benthic organisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 19917–19926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sou, T.; Bergström, C.A.S. Automated assays for thermodynamic (equilibrium) solubility determination. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2018, 27, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sirbu, F.; Dragoescu, D.; Shchamialiou, A.A.; Khasanshin, T. Densities, speeds of sound, refractive indices, viscosities and their related thermodynamic properties for n-hexadecane + two aromatic hydrocarbons binary mixtures at temperatures from 298.15 K to 318.15 K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019, 128, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sirbu, F.; Gheorghe, I. Study on thermophysical properties in the ternary mixture of N-methylglycine solute with (D-glucose+water) binary solvent at temperatures of 298.15, 308.15, and 318.15 K. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 253, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ion, I.; Bogdan, D.; Mincu, M.M.; Ion, A.C. Modified Exfoliated Carbon Nanoplatelets as Sorbents for Ammonium from Natural Mineral Waters. Molecules 2021, 26, 3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ivan, G.R.; Ion, I.; Capra, L.; Oprea, O.; Ion, A.C. The influence of the chemical composition of natural waters about the triclocarban sorption on pristine and irradiated MWCNTs. Separations 2023, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ion, I.; Sirbu, F.; Ion, A.C. Thermophysical investigations of exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets and active carbon in binary aqueous environments at different temperatures. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 587–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ratina, K.; Umadevi, M.; Senthamil, S.C.; Ramalatha, M. Research on Ion-Solvent Interactions in the Inorganic Liquid Mixtures by Ultrasonic Technique. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019, 8, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rathina, K.; Umadevi, M.; Senthamil selvi, C.; Marimuthu, R.; Mrad, S.; Lafuente, C.; Hichri, M.; Khattech, I. Density, Speed of Sound, Refractive Index, and Viscosity of the Binary Mixtures of N,N dimethylacetamide with Methanol and Ethanol. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2016, 61, 2946–2953. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gonzalez, E.J.; Alonso, L.; Domínguez, A. Physical Properties of Binary Mixtures of the Ionic Liquid 1-Methyl-3-octylimidazolium Chloride with Methanol, Ethanol, and 1-Propanol at T = (298.15, 313.15, and 328.15) K and at p = 0.1 MPa. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 1446–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rodríguez, A.; Canosa, J.; Tojo, J. Physical Properties of Binary Mixtures (Dimethyl Carbonate + Alcohols) at Several Temperatures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2001, 46, 1476–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Goncalves, F.A.M.M.; Trindade, A.R.; Costa, C.S.M.F.; Bernardo, J.C.S.; Johnson, I.; Fonseca, I.M.A.; Ferreira, A.G.M. Viscosity, and Surface Tension of Ethanol: New Measurements and Literature Data Evaluation. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2010, 42, 1039–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salinas, R.; Pla-Franco, J.; Lladosa, E.; Monton, J.B. Density, Speed of Sound, Viscosity, and Excess Properties of Binary Mixtures Formed by Ethanol and Bis(trifluorosulfonyl)imide-Based Ionic Liquids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015, 60, 525–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ortega, J. Densities and Refractive Indices of Pure Alcohols as a Function of Temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1982, 27, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Khirade, P.W.; Chaudhari, A.; Shinde, J.B.; Helambe, S.N.; Methrotra, S.C. Static Dielectric Constant and Relaxation Time Measurements on Binary Mixtures of Dimethyl Sulfoxide with Ethanol, 2-Ethoxyethanol, and Propan-1-ol at 293, 303, 313, and 323 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1999, 44, 879–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Benkelfat-Seladji, N.L.; Ouaar, F.; Hernandez, A.; Bahadur, I.; Munoz-Rujas, N.; Singh, S.K.; Montero, E.; Chiali-Baba Ahmed, N.; Negadi, L. Density, speed of sound, refractive index of binary mixtures containing 2-ethoxyethanol and some alcohols: Measurement and correlation. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2022, 170, 106762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aralaguppi, M.; Jadar, C.V.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Density, refractive index, viscosity, and speed of sound in binary mixtures of 2-ethoxyethanol with dioxane, acetonitrile, and tetrahydrofuran at (298.15, 303.15, and 308.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1996, 41, 1307–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Belhadj, D.; Bahadur, I.; Negadi, A.; Munoz-Rujas, N.; Montero, E.; Negadi, L. Thermodynamic, Ultrasonic, and Transport Study of Binary Mixtures Containing 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol and Alcohols at (293.15–323.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2020, 65, 5192–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Das, M.; Roy, M.N. Volumetric, viscosimetric and acoustic studies of binary mixtures of 2-ethoxyethanol with 1-alkanols at 298.15 K. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2006, 44, 663–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Makhlouf, H.; Muñoz-Rujas, N.; Aguilar, F.; Belhachemi, B.; Montero, E.A.; Bahadur, I.; Negadi, L. Density, speed of sound and re-fractive index of mixtures containing 2-phenoxyethanol with propanol or butanol at various temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019, 25, 394–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rodríguez, A.; Canosa, J.; Tojo, J. Density, refractive index, and speed of sound of binary mixtures (diethyl carbonate + alcohols) at several temperatures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2001, 46, 1506–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pang, F.-M.; Seng, C.-E.; Teng, T.-T.; Ibrahim, M.H. Densities and viscosities of aqueous solutions of 1-propanol and 2-propanol at temperatures from 293.15 K to 333.15 K. J. Mol. Liq. 2007, 136, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Paramo, R.; Alonso, V.; Gonzalez, J.A.; de la Fuente, I.G.; Casanova, C.; Carlos, J. Thermodynamics of mixtures containing amines. XIV. CpmE of benzylamine with heptane at 293.15K or with methanol, 1-propanol or 1-pentanol at 293.15–308.15 K. Thermochim. Acta 2014, 586, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Aminabhavi, T.M.; Gopalakrishna, B. Density, Viscosity, Refractive Index, and Speed of Sound in Binary Mixtures of 2-Ethoxyethanol with n-Alkanes (C6 to C12), 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane, and Cyclohexane in the Temperature Interval 298.15–313.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Resa, J.M.; González, C.; Goenaga, J.M. Density, refractive index, speed of sound at 298.15 K, and vapor-liquid equilibria at 101.3 kPa for binary mixtures of propanol + 2-methyl-1-butanol and propanol + 3-methyl-l-butanol. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 73–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Benkelfat-Seladji, N.L.; Ouaar, F.; Hernandez, A.; Munoz-Rujas, N.; Bahadur, I.; Chiali-Baba Ahmed, N.; Montero, E.; Negadi, L. Intermolecular Interactions of Binary Mixtures Comprising 2-Benzylaminoethanol with Alcohols (C1–C3) at Different Temperatures: Experiments and Modelling. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2021, 66, 3397–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mrad, S.; Hichri, M.; Khattech, I.; Lafuente, C. Thermophysical study of the binary mixtures of N,N-dimethylacetamide with 1-propanol and 1-butanol. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 231, 168–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Aralaguppi, M.I.; Baragi, J.G. Physico-chemical and excess properties of the binary mixtures of methylcyclohexane + ethanol, + pro-pan-1-ol, + propan-2-ol, + butan-1-ol, + 2-methyl-1-propanol, or 3-methyl-1-butanol at T = (298.15, 303.15, and 308.15) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2006, 38, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mokhtarani, B.; Sharifi, A.; Mortaheb, H.R.; Mirzaei, M.; Mafi, M.; Sadeghian, F. Density and viscosity of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate with ethanol, 1-propanol, or 1-butanol at several temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2009, 41, 1432–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ritzoulis, G.; Fidantsi, A. Relative Permittivities, Refractive Indices, and Densities for the Binary Mixtures N,N′-Dimethylacetamide with Methanol, Ethanol, 1-Butanol, and 2-Propanol at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2000, 45, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Aminabhavi, T.M.; Banerjee, K. Density, Viscosity, Refractive Index, and Speed of Sound in Binary Mixtures of 2-Chloroethanol with Alkanols (C1–C6) at 298.15, 303.15, and 308.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Giner, B.; Artigas, H.; Carrion, A.; Lafuente, C.; Royo, F. Excess thermodynamic properties of isomeric butanols with 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran. J. Mol. Liq. 2003, 108, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bahadur, I.; Deenadayalu, N.; Tywabi, Z.; Sen, S.; Hofman, T. Volumetric properties of ternary (IL + 2-propanol or 1-butanol or 2-butanol + ethyl acetate) systems and binary (IL + 2-propanol or 1-butanol or 2-butanol) and (1-butanol or 2-butanol + ethyl acetate) systems. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2012, 49, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Troncoso, J.; Carballo, E.; Cerdeiriña, C.A.; González, D.; Romaní, L. Systematic Determination of Densities and Speeds of Sound of Nitroethane+ isomers of Butanol in the Range (283.15–308.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2000, 45, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jiménez, E.; Cabanas, M.; Segade, L.; García-Garabal, S.; Casas, H. Excess volume, changes of refractive index and surface tension of binary 1,2-ethanediol + 1-propanol or 1-butanol mixtures at several several temperatures. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2001, 180, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dubey, G.P.; Sharma, M. Temperature and Composition Dependence of the Densities, Viscosities, and Speeds of Sound of Binary Liquid Mixtures of 1-Butanol with Hexadecane and Squalane. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2008, 53, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Varfolomeev, M.A.; Zaitseva, K.V.; Rakipov, I.T.; Solomonov, B.N.; Marczak, W. Speed of sound, density, and related thermodynamic excess properties of binary mixtures of butan-2-one with C1–C4 n-alkanols and chloroform. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2014, 59, 4118–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wandschneider, A.; Lehmann, J.K.; Heintz, A. Surface Tension and Density of Pure Ionic Liquids and Some Binary Mixtures with 1-Propanol and 1-Butanol. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2008, 53, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al-Kandary, J.A.; Al-Jimaz, A.S.; Abdul-Latif, A.M. Densities, Viscosities, Speeds of Sound and Refractive Indices of Binary Mixtures of Tetrahydrofuran with 1-Hexanol, 1-Heptanol, 1-Octanol, 1-Nonanol and 1-Decanol at 298.15, 303.15, 308.15 and 313.15 K. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2009, 47, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sirbu, F.; Ion, A.C.; Capra, L.; Ion, I. A Thermodynamics Study on the Tetrahydrofuran Effect in Exfoliated Graphite Nanoplatelets and Activated Carbon Mixtures at Temperatures between 293.15 and 308.15 K. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 2018, 9106043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Iloukhani, H.; Zoorasna, Z.; Soleimani, R. Excess molar volumes and speeds of sound of tetrahydrofuran with chloroethanes or chloroethenes at 298.15 K. Phys. Chem. Liq. 2005, 43, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Arce, A.; Blanco, A.; Soto, A.; Vidal, I. Densities, refractive indices, and excess molar volumes of the ternary systems water + methanol + 1-octanol and water + ethanol + 1-octanol and their binary mixtures at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1993, 38, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wankhede, D.S. Refractive indices for binary mixtures of propylene carbonate. Int. J. Chem. Res. 2011, 2, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  71. Dubey, G.P.; Kumar, R. Densities, speeds of sound and viscosities of binary mixtures of tetrahydrofuran with 1-hexanol, 1-octanol and 1-decanol at T = (298.15 to 313.15) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2014, 71, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Alkhaldi, K.H.A.E.; Al-Jimaz, A.S.; AlTuwaim, M.S. Densities, ultrasonic speeds and refractive indices of phenetole with N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, N,N-dimethylformamide and tetrahydrofuran binary mixtures at different temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2016, 103, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hoga, H.E.; Olivieri, G.V.; Torres, R.B. Experimental Measurements of Volumetric and Acoustic Properties of Binary Mixtures of 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate with Molecular Solvents. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2020, 65, 3406–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Fattahi, M.; Iloukhani, H. Excess molar volume, viscosity, and refractive index study for the ternary mixture {2-methyl-2-butanol (1) + tetrahydrofuran (2) + propylamine (3)} at different temperatures. Application of the ERAS-model and Peng–Robinson–Stryjek–Vera equation of state. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2010, 42, 1335–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. AlTuwaim, M.S.; Alkhaldi, K.H.; Al-Jimaz, A.S.; Mohammad, A.A. Physico-chemical properties of binary mixtures of N,N-dimethylformamide with 1-octanol, 1-nonanol and 1-decanol at different temperatures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2013, 58, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Acree, W.E., Jr. Thermodynamic Properties of Non Electrolyte Solutions; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ion, I.; Sirbu, F.; Ion, A.C. Density, Refractive Index, and Ultrasound Speed in Mixtures of Active Carbon and Exfoliated Graphite Na-noplatelets Dispersed in N,N Dimethylformamide at Temperatures from (293.15 to 318.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2013, 58, 1212–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, S.; Zhao, L.; Yue, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, J. Density, viscosity, surface tension and spectroscopic studies for the liquid mixture of tetra-ethylene glycol + N,N-dimethylformamide at six temperatures. J. Mol. Liq. 2018, 264, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Aminabhavi, T.M.; Patil, V.B. Density, Viscosity, Refractive Index, and Speed of Sound in Binary Mixtures of Ethenylbenzene with N,N-Dimethylacetamide, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide, 1,4-Dioxane, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, Chloroform, Bromoform, and 1-Chloronaphthalene in the Temperature Interval (298.15–308.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1998, 43, 497–503. [Google Scholar]
  80. Riddick, J.A.; Bunger, W.B.; Sakano, T.K. Organic Solvents Physical Properties and Methods of Purifications. In Techniques in Chemistry; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1986; Volume II. [Google Scholar]
  81. El-Dossoki, F.I. Refractive index and density measurements for selected binary protic-protic, aprotic-aprotic, and aprotic-protic systems at temperatures from 298.15 to 308.15 K. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2007, 54, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zarei, H.; Keley, V. Density and Speed of Sound of Binary Mixtures of Ionic Liquid 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Tetrafluorobo-rate,N,N-Dimethylformamide, and N,N-Dimethylacetamide at Temperature Range of 293.15–343.15 K: Measurement and PC-SAFT Modeling. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2017, 62, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Garcia, B.; Alcalde, R.; Leal, J.M.; Trenzado, J.L. Volumetric behaviour of N-methylformamide–(C1–C10)alkan-1-ol and N,N-dimethylformamide–(C1–C10)alkan-1-ol solvent systems. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shukla, R.K.; Kumar, A.; Awasthi, N.; Srivastava, U.; Gangwar, V.S. Density, viscosity and refractive index of binary liquid mixtures at 293.15, 298.15, 303.15, 308.15 and 313.15 K. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2012, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Chen, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, Z. Volumetric properties of the binary liquid mixtures of N,N-dimethylacetamide + benzene, +toluene, or +ethylbenzene at different temperatures and atmospheric pressure. J. Mol. Liq. 2008, 140, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cobos, A.; González, J.A.; Hevia, F.; De La Fuente, I.G.; Tristán, C.A. Thermodynamics of amide + ketone mixtures. Volumetric, speed of sound and refractive index data for N,N-dimethylacetamide + 2-alkanone systems at several temperatures. Application of Flory’s model to tertiary amide + n-alkanone systems. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 248, 286–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Warminska, D.; Placzek, A.; Koziel, H.; Grzybkowski, W. Adiabatic Compressibilities of Divalent Transition-Metal Perchlorates and Chlorides in N,N-Dimethylacetamide and Dimethylsulfoxide. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2009, 54, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Iloukhani, H.; Rakhshi, M. Excess molar volumes, viscosities, and refractive indices for binary and ternary mixtures of {cyclohexanone (1) + N,N-dimethylacetamide (2) + N,N-diethylethanolamine (3)} at (298.15, 308.15, and 318.15) K. J. Mol. Liq. 2009, 149, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ivanov, E.V.; Smirnov, V.I. Water as a solute in aprotic dipolar solvents: D2O–H2O solute isotope effects on the enthalpy of water dissolution in dimethylsulphoxide, N,N-dimethylformamide and N,N-dimethylacetamide at 298.15 K. Thermochim. Acta 2011, 526, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Aminabhavi, T.M.; Gopalakrishna, B. Density, Viscosity, Refractive Index, and Speed of Sound in Aqueous Mixtures of N,N-Dimethylformamide, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, N,N-Dimethylacetamide, Acetonitrile, Ethylene Glycol, Diethylene Glycol, 1,4-Dioxane, Tetrahydrofuran, 2-Methoxyethanol, and 2-Ethoxyethanol at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1995, 40, 856–861. [Google Scholar]
  91. Papamatthaiakis, D.; Aroni, F.; Havredaki, V. Isentropic Compressibilities of (Amide + Water) Mixtures: A comparative Study. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2008, 40, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Baragi, J.G.; Aralaguppi, M.I.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Kariduraganavar, M.Y.; Kulkarni, S.S. Density, viscosity, refractive index, and speed of sound for binary mixtures of 1,4-dioxane with different organic liquids at (298.15, 303.15, and 308.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2005, 50, 917–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Rakini Chandrasekaran, J.H.; Nithiyanantham, S. Solvation number, thermochemical parameter, and viscosity study of sweeteners in aqueous and non-aqueous media through ultrasonic measurements. Chem. Phys. Mater. 2023, 2, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gonzalez, C.; Resa, J.M.; Lanz, J.; Iglesias, M. Intermolecular interactions in soybean oil + different organic solvents by ultrasonic velocity measurements. J. Food Eng. 2006, 77, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rowlinson, J.S.; Swinton, F.L. Liquid and Liquid Mixtures, 3rd ed.; Butterworths: London, UK, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  96. Gerecze, N.G. Ultrasonic studies in solutions of polyethylene glycol. Acta Acust. United Acust. 1977, 38, 51–57. [Google Scholar]
  97. Spierings, G.A.C.M.; Melis, G.P. Refractive index and density of alkali lime borogermanosilicate glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 1981, 16, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Reddy, V.N.; Rao, K.S.W.K.; Subha, M.C.S.; Rao, K.C. Miscibility behaviour of dextrin/PVA blends in water at 35 °C. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Polymer Technology, Berhampur, India, 26–27 February 2010; pp. 356–368. [Google Scholar]
  99. Allen, R.D. A new equation relating index of refraction and specific gravity. Am. Mineral. 1956, 41, 245–257. [Google Scholar]
  100. Jacobson, B. Ultrasonic Velocity in Liquids and Liquid Mixtures. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 20, 927–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jacobson, B. Intermolecular free lengths in the liquid state. I. Adiabatic and isothermal compressibilities. Acta Chem. Scand 1952, 6, 1485–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kumar Sharma, D.; Agarwal, S.; KhanDer, A. Intermolecular Free Length and Molar Volume of Binary Liquid Mixtures of Ethyl Acetate with 1-Alkanol at 303.15K. Pharma Chem. 2022, 14, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  103. Altenberg, K. Ultraschallgeschwindigkeit und Molekülstruktur. Z. Phys. Chem. 1950, 195, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lomesh, S.K.; Bala, M.; Nathan, V. A study of enhancing the solubility of streptomycin sulphate in sorbitol using volumetric, acoustic and viscometric properties. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 404, 124997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tewari, Y.B.; Miller, M.M.; Wasik, S.P. Calculation of Aqueous Solubility of Organic Compounds. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 1982, 87, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ilyas, H.; Masih, I.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Prediction of the removal efficiency of emerging organic contaminants in constructed wetlands based on their physicochemical properties. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 294, 112916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Baldevraj, P.P.; Rajendran, V. Science and Technology of Ultrasonics; Narosa publishing House: Delhi, India, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ikhe, S.; Narwade, M. Ultrasonic studies of substituted izoxazoles and pyrazolines in dioxane and dioxane-water mixtures at different temperatures. Ind. J. Chem. 2005, 44, 1203–1205. [Google Scholar]
  109. Sinha, A.; Roy, M.N. Densities, Viscosities, and Sound Speeds of Some Acetate Salts in Binary Mixtures of Tetrahydrofuran and Methanol at (303.15, 313.15, and 323.15) K. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2006, 51, 1415–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dikko, A.B.; Ezike, S.C.; Ike, E. Ultrasonic velocity and some acoustical and thermodynamic parameters of multi-component liquid mixture at different temperatures. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 1, 454–458. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kaur, P.; Tarsikka, P.S. Intercorrelations of Ultrasonic Velocity with Density and Viscosity in Adulterated Mustard Oil. J. Agric. Phys. 2020, 20, 191–198. [Google Scholar]
  112. Guan, J.; Yan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, J.; Sun, Y.; Peng, X. Investigation of the molecular interactions of triclocarban with human serum albumin using multispectroscopies and molecular modeling. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2019, 37, 3550–3565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Guan, J.; Yan, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y.; Peng, X. Binding studies of triclocarban with bovine serum albumin: Insights from multi-spectroscopy and molecular modeling methods. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 202, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Brausch, J.M.; Rand, G.M. A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 2011, 82, 1518–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Schmitz, G.S.; Santana, E.R.; Baumgarten, L.G.; Winiarskia, J.P.; Colaçob, M.C.; Caramorib, G.F.; Spinellic, A.; Vieira, I.C. A simple and reliable electrochemical method employing an unmodified boron-doped diamond electrode for the determination of triclocarban. Electrochim. Acta 2024, 486, 144093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yang, H.; Sanidad, K.Z.; Wang, W.; Xie, M.; Gu, M.; Cao, X.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, G. Triclocarban exposure exaggerates colitis and colon tumorigenesis: Roles of gut microbiota involved. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1690364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ameta, R.K.; Singh, M.; Kale, R.K. Comparative study of density, sound velocity and refractive index for (water + alkali metal) phosphates aqueous systems at T = (298.15, 303.15, 308.15) K. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2013, 60, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Molecules 29 04521 g001
Figure 1. Solvation number versus temperature for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA(2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC(1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. The lines in the figure are presented only to visualize the Sn variation.
Figure 1. Solvation number versus temperature for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA(2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC(1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. The lines in the figure are presented only to visualize the Sn variation.
Molecules 29 04521 g001
Molecules 29 04521 g002
Figure 2. Intermolecular free length versus vs. temperature for pure EA (○), X1 = 0; nP (+), X1 = 0; nB (□), X1 = 0; THF (Δ), X1 = 0; DMF (◊), X1 = 0; and DMA (×), X1 = 0 solvents and for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA (2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC (1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. – – linear correlation for pure solvents; ⎯⎯⎯ linear correlation for binary mixtures.
Figure 2. Intermolecular free length versus vs. temperature for pure EA (○), X1 = 0; nP (+), X1 = 0; nB (□), X1 = 0; THF (Δ), X1 = 0; DMF (◊), X1 = 0; and DMA (×), X1 = 0 solvents and for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA (2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC (1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. – – linear correlation for pure solvents; ⎯⎯⎯ linear correlation for binary mixtures.
Molecules 29 04521 g002
Molecules 29 04521 g003
Figure 3. Surface tension versus temperature for pure EA (○), X1 = 0; nP (+), X1 = 0; nB (□), X1 = 0; THF (Δ), X1 = 0; DMF (◊), X1 = 0; and DMA (×), X1 = 0 solvents and for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA(2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC(1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. – – linear correlation for pure solvents; ⎯⎯⎯ linear correlation for binary mixtures.
Figure 3. Surface tension versus temperature for pure EA (○), X1 = 0; nP (+), X1 = 0; nB (□), X1 = 0; THF (Δ), X1 = 0; DMF (◊), X1 = 0; and DMA (×), X1 = 0 solvents and for TCC in binary TCC (1) + EA(2) (●), X1 = 0.0626; TCC (1) + nP (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i001), X1 = 0.0663; TCC (1) + nB (2) (■), X1 = 0.0697; TCC (1) + THF (2) (▲), X1 = 0.0390; TCC(1) + DMF (2) (♦), X1 = 0.1261; and TCC (1) + DMA (2) (Molecules 29 04521 i002), X1 = 0.0564 mixtures. – – linear correlation for pure solvents; ⎯⎯⎯ linear correlation for binary mixtures.
Molecules 29 04521 g003
Table 1. Experimental values of densities (ρ), the speed of sound (u) and refractive index (nD) for pure Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide solvents at temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa) along with available values at 298.15 K.
Table 1. Experimental values of densities (ρ), the speed of sound (u) and refractive index (nD) for pure Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide solvents at temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa) along with available values at 298.15 K.
T, Kρ, g cm−3u, m s−1nD
Ethyl alcohol
293.150.7898111161.631.361447
298.150.7854891143.421.359439
0.78506 [36]1143.17 [36]1.359130 [36]
0.78511 [37]1143 [37]1.35922 [38]
0.7855 [39]1143.07 [40]1.3593 [41]
0.7893 [42]1144 [43]1.3605 [44]
0.786 [45]1142 [46]1.360 [45]
303.150.7811221128.181.357238
308.150.7767071108.971.355301
313.150.7722361094.721.353645
318.150.7677111077.641.351281
323.150.7615151061.531.349268
n-Propyl alcohol
293.150.8043171224.611.385059
298.150.8004131206.421.383034
0.800 [43,45,47]1208.03 [45]1.38307 [48]
0.80021 [49]1207.3 [47]1.38370 [38]
0.799657 [50]1206 [48]1.3832 [41]
0.7996 [51]1205.69 [52]1.383 [45,47,53]
0.79977 [54]1209.4 [46]1.3840 [55]
303.150.7962511190.631.380950
308.150.7924971174.361.378912
313.150.7886321158.861.376804
318.150.7847481141.311.374651
323.150.7810841124.351.372472
n-Butyl alcohol
293.150.8098631258.461.398898
298.150.8068571241.251.396938
0.806 [47,56,57]1241.8 [47]1.397 [47]
0.8071 [58]1241 [59]1.3967 [41]
0.8070 [60]1238.99 [61]1.3972 [62]
0.80590 [48,63]1240.37 [64]1.39702 [48]
0.8053 [65]1240.5 [63]1.3983 [55]
303.150.8020611226.281.394814
308.150.7987821208.711.392757
313.150.7954371192.141.390715
318.150.7910821175.491.388654
323.150.7863281158.651.386560
Tetrahydrofuran
293.150.8875511302.541.407321
298.150.8821231278.861.404612
0.882322 [66]1278.93 [66]1.4053 [66]
0.88216 [67]1279.38 [67]1.40464 [67]
0.88207 [68]1277.60 [69]1.4049 [70]
0.882150 [71]1280.1 [71]1.405 [72]
0.8828 [73]1278 [72,73]1.4037 [74]
303.150.8765421254.621.40205
308.150.8711261230.311.39938
313.150.8656591206.871.39679
318.150.8601741182.261.39415
323.150.8546891157.731.39136
N,N-Dimethylformamide
293.150.9497891482.821.430508
298.150.9450141462.941.428251
0.944290 [75]1458 [73]1.4305 [76]
0.94502 [77]1457 [72]1.429 [72]
0.9445 [78,79]1457.50 [80]1.4290 [81]
0.943978 [82]1457.69 [75]1.42810 [83]
0. 95010 [84]1463.76 [77]1.42805 [77]
303.150.9401191443.861.425988
308.150.9353201423.791.423685
313.150.9304551404.951.421411
318.150.9258481384.871.419096
323.150.9210601365.711.416780
N,N-Dimethylacetamide
293.150.9410521477.021.438107
298.150.9364591456.921.435740
0.9364 [85]1453.68 [36]1.43621 [86]
0.9365 [80]1455.37 [87]1.43571 [88]
0.93639 [86]1475.3 [86]1.4359 [89]
0.9366 [90]1458 [90]1.435794 [36]
0.93634 [91]1478.98 [91]1.4364 [92]
303.150.9318481436.871.433288
308.150.9272281416.831.430911
313.150.9226041396.871.428593
318.150.9179911377.031.426357
323.150.9133441357.231.424067
Standard uncertainties u are as follows: u(T) = 0.02 K and u(p) = 0.04 MPa, and the combined expanded uncertainty Uc in mole fraction, density, speed of sound and refractive index was Uc(x) = 0.0008, Uc(ρ) = 0.004 g cm−3, Uc(u) = 1.2 m s−1 and Uc(nD) = 0.0005, respectively (0.95 level of confidence).
Table 2. Experimental values of densities (ρ), the ultrasonic velocities (u), refractive index (nD), together with the solvation number computed for binary TCC + solvent mixtures at temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K.
Table 2. Experimental values of densities (ρ), the ultrasonic velocities (u), refractive index (nD), together with the solvation number computed for binary TCC + solvent mixtures at temperatures between (293.15 and 323.15) K.
T, Kρ/g cm−3u/m s−1nDSnρ/g cm−3u/m s−1nDSn
TCC (1) + AE (2), X1 = 0.0626TCC (1) + nP (2), X1 = 0.0663
293.150.8044761181.601.3622560.765460.8152791251.191.3852180.77326
298.150.8001561163.771.3602000.783830.8111731233.971.3831650.80024
303.150.7958341148.911.3580400.802160.8070211216.661.3811850.77601
308.150.7913881130.081.3560170.821460.8028211199.381.3790870.75493
313.150.7868601116.211.3543880.838460.7985721182.131.3770120.71732
318.150.7822511099.51.3520350.856610.7942681164.961.3748860.72788
323.150.7775481083.781.3500550.904470.7899071147.791.3725400.72015
TCC (1) + nB (2), X1 = 0.0697TCC (1) + THF (2), X1 = 0.0390
293.150.8157111269.051.3990690.315890.8892901304.191.4076810.11042
298.150.8118231252.071.3970350.309890.8838581280.531.4048940.11252
303.150.8078971235.041.3950320.283680.8783811256.541.4022200.12673
308.150.8039331218.061.3929230.288290.8728611232.661.3996530.14271
313.150.7999311201.181.3908790.273970.8673051208.941.3970290.13097
318.150.7958821184.371.3888270.278650.8617111185.491.3944450.17787
323.150.7917821167.561.3867410.293440.8560691162.101.3918810.22448
TCC (1) + DMF (2), X1 = 0.1261TCC (1) + DMA (2), X1 = 0.0564
293.150.9637931535.121.4279140.558270.9623321569.881.4356182.24954
298.150.9590571515.991.4257280.571200.9576821549.701.4337032.27238
303.150.9533291496.721.4235480.570390.9528941527.681.4318222.25815
308.150.9495261477.441.4213150.590630.9481951507.231.4296012.27499
313.150.9437741458.231.4190660.588120.9434691486.861.4273302.29182
318.150.9399451439.051.4168750.608450.9387101466.521.4250942.30651
323.150.9351231419.861.4146950.615120.9339261446.301.4228312.32331
Xi is molar fraction of TCC solute in binary mixtures. Standard uncertainties, u, are as follows: u(T) = 0.02 K and u(p) = 0.04 MPa, and the combined expanded uncertainty Uc in mole fraction, density, speed of sound and refractive index was Uc(x) = 0.0008, Uc(ρ) = 0.004 g cm−3, Uc(u) = 1.2 m s−1 and Uc(nD) = 0.0005, respectively (0.95 level of confidence).
Table 3. Calculated values of acoustic impedance, (Z); adiabatic compressibility, (κS); space-filling factor, (S); specific refraction, (rD); relaxation strength, (r); intermolecular free length, (Lf); surface tension, (σ); and modified surface tension, (σmod), for pure solvents and binary TCC (1) + solvent (2) mixtures at various temperatures.
Table 3. Calculated values of acoustic impedance, (Z); adiabatic compressibility, (κS); space-filling factor, (S); specific refraction, (rD); relaxation strength, (r); intermolecular free length, (Lf); surface tension, (σ); and modified surface tension, (σmod), for pure solvents and binary TCC (1) + solvent (2) mixtures at various temperatures.
T/KZ/105 kg m−2s−1κS/ 10−9m2 N−1SrD/10−3 m3 kg−1rLf·1010/mσ/N·m−1σmod./N·m−1
TCC (1) + AE (2), X1 = 0
293.159.174680.938300.221490.280440.472900.624290.01970.0208
298.158.981440.973750.220390.280580.489290.641830.01910.0203
303.158.812461.005830.219180.280590.502820.658260.01860.0199
308.158.613451.046900.218110.280810.519600.677630.01810.0194
313.158.453821.080550.217190.281250.531870.694600.01760.0190
318.158.273161.121640.215880.281200.546360.713960.01710.0185
323.158.083711.165350.214770.282030.559830.734140.01660.0181
TCC (1) + AE (2), X1 = 0.0626
293.159.505690.890320.221940.275880.454620.608120.02060.0217
298.159.311980.922760.220810.275960.470950.624800.02000.0212
303.159.143420.951930.219620.275960.484380.640380.01950.0208
308.158.943320.989450.218500.276100.501140.658780.01890.0203
313.158.783011.020020.217600.276550.513310.674870.01850.0199
318.158.600851.057460.216300.276510.527770.693240.01800.0195
323.158.426911.094940.215200.276770.541180.711620.01750.0190
TCC (1) + nP (2), X1 = 0
293.159.849750.829040.234380.291400.414190.586820.02170.0229
298.159.656340.858400.233280.291450.431470.602610.02110.0224
303.159.480400.885920.232150.291560.446250.617780.02060.0220
308.159.306770.914960.231040.291540.461280.633490.02010.0215
313.159.139140.944200.229900.291520.475410.649300.01960.0211
318.158.956410.978280.228730.291460.491180.666780.01910.0207
323.158.782121.012740.227540.291310.506190.684390.01860.0202
TCC (1) + nP (2), X1 = 0.0663
293.1510.200690.783510.234470.287590.388490.570480.02270.0240
298.1510.009630.809610.233350.287670.405200.585240.02220.0235
303.159.818700.837100.232280.287820.421770.600520.02160.0230
308.159.628870.865900.231140.287910.438080.616280.02100.0225
313.159.440160.896100.230010.288030.454130.632540.02040.0220
318.159.252900.927710.228850.288130.469870.649310.01990.0216
323.159.066470.960950.227570.288100.485380.666660.01940.0211
TCC (1) + nB (2), X1 = 0
293.1510.191800.779670.241830.298610.381360.569080.02280.0240
298.1510.015110.804420.240780.298420.398160.583360.02220.0236
303.159.835510.829110.239640.298780.412590.597640.02170.0231
308.159.654960.856890.238530.298620.429300.613060.02110.0227
313.159.482720.884590.237430.298500.444840.628470.02060.0222
318.159.299090.914830.236320.298730.460240.644790.02010.0218
323.159.110790.947310.235190.299100.475600.661910.01950.0213
TCC (1) + nB (2), X1 = 0.0697
293.1510.351780.761210.241930.296580.370900.562300.02320.0245
298.1510.164590.785740.240830.296660.387630.576550.02270.0240
303.159.977850.811490.239760.296770.404170.591260.02210.0236
308.159.792390.838380.238620.296820.420440.606410.02150.0231
313.159.608610.866430.237520.296930.436390.621980.02100.0226
318.159.426190.895730.236420.297050.452060.638020.02040.0221
323.159.244530.926480.235290.297160.467500.654590.01990.0217
TCC (1) + THF (2), X1 = 0
293.1511.560710.664090.246340.277550.337260.525210.02630.0277
298.1511.281120.693150.244890.277620.361140.541510.02540.0270
303.1510.997270.724770.243520.277820.385130.558780.02450.0262
308.1510.717550.758390.242090.277910.408730.576750.02370.0254
313.1510.447380.793110.240700.278060.431040.595080.02290.0246
318.1510.169490.831740.239280.278180.454010.614810.02200.0239
323.159.894990.872930.237780.278210.476430.635390.02120.0231
TCC (1) + THF (2), X1 = 0.0390
293.1511.598030.661110.246530.277220.335580.524030.02640.0278
298.1511.318070.689980.245040.277240.359470.540270.02550.0271
303.1511.037210.721050.243610.277340.383250.557340.02460.0263
308.1510.759410.753990.242240.277520.406460.575080.02380.0255
313.1510.485200.788890.240830.277680.429090.593500.02300.0248
318.1510.215500.825740.239440.277870.451020.612590.02220.0240
323.159.948380.864980.238060.278090.472470.632490.02140.0233
TCC (1) + DMF (2), X1 = 0
293.1514.083660.478850.258590.272260.141110.445980.03420.0360
298.1513.824990.494430.257410.272380.163990.457350.03330.0353
303.1513.574000.510230.256220.272540.185650.468830.03250.0346
308.1513.316990.527410.255010.272640.208130.480970.03170.0339
313.1513.072430.544480.253810.272780.228950.493060.03090.0333
318.1512.821790.563170.252580.272810.250830.505910.03010.0326
323.1512.579010.582100.251360.272900.271420.518860.02930.0319
TCC (1) + DMF (2), X1 = 0.1261
293.1514.795380.440280.257230.266890.079460.427640.03650.0385
298.1514.539210.453690.256080.267010.102260.438100.03570.0378
303.1514.268670.468250.254930.267410.124930.449130.03480.0371
308.1514.028680.482470.253760.267250.147330.460020.03400.0364
313.1513.762400.498290.252570.267620.169360.471690.03310.0357
318.1513.526280.513740.251410.267470.191070.483190.03230.0350
323.1513.277440.530440.250260.267620.212500.495300.03150.0343
TCC (1) + DMA (2), X1 = 0
293.1513.899530.487090.262560.279010.147820.449810.03370.0355
298.1513.643460.503080.261330.279060.170850.461330.03280.0348
303.1513.389440.519780.260050.279070.193520.473200.03200.0341
308.1513.137240.537250.258800.279110.215860.485430.03120.0334
313.1512.887580.555490.257590.279200.237790.498020.03030.0327
318.1512.641010.574480.256410.279320.259290.510960.02960.0320
323.1512.396180.594370.255210.279420.280440.524300.02880.0313
TCC (1) + DMA (2), X1 = 0.0564
293.1515.107460.421640.261270.271490.037300.418490.03770.0398
298.1514.841200.434790.260260.271770.061890.428880.03680.0390
303.1514.557170.449670.259280.272100.088360.440130.03580.0382
308.1514.291480.464240.258120.272220.112600.451250.03500.0375
313.1514.028060.479440.256920.272320.136420.462680.03410.0367
318.1513.766370.495330.255750.272450.159890.474460.03320.0360
323.1513.507370.511880.254560.272570.182900.486560.03240.0353
Xi is molar fraction of TCC solute in binary mixtures.
Table 4. The physicochemical parameters of TCC in organic solvent solubility (s) and constant (KOW) values at 298.15 K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa.
Table 4. The physicochemical parameters of TCC in organic solvent solubility (s) and constant (KOW) values at 298.15 K and at pressure p = 0.1 MPa.
Solvent NameX1Solubility TCC in SolventKOW
Ethyl alcohol0.0626191.1387530.173696
n-Propyl alcohol0.0663110.9457360.184112
n-Butyl alcohol0.0697080.8156110.192859
Tetrahydrofuran0.0389870.4962070.225380
N,N-Dimethylformamide0.1260691.8648630.148805
N,N-Dimethylacetamide0.0563670.6421280.207878
Table 5. Specification of triclocarban, Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide compounds used in samples.
Table 5. Specification of triclocarban, Ethyl alcohol, n-Propyl alcohol, n-Butyl alcohol, Tetrahydrofuran, N,N-Dimethylformamide and N,N-Dimethylacetamide compounds used in samples.
Chemical NameMolar Mass/g mol−1SupplierMass Fraction Purity/%Purification Method *
3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea315.58Sigma Aldrich≤100%dried in vacuum
Ethyl alcohol46.070Sigma Aldrich≥98%none
n-Propyl alcohol60.100Sigma Aldrich≥98%(G.C.)
n-Butyl alcohol74.120Sigma Aldrich≥99%none
Tetrahydrofuran72.110Fluka Chemie AG≥99%none
N,N-Dimetilformamide73.090E. Merck99%none
N,N-Dimethylacetamide87.120Fluka Chemie AG>99.5%none
* The purity of these compounds was analyzed by the suppliers.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sirbu, F.; Ion, A.C.; Ion, I. Study of the Optical and Acoustic Parameters and Surface Tensions of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea in Binary Mixtures with Different Organic Solvents between (293.15 and 323.15) K. Molecules 2024, 29, 4521. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194521

AMA Style

Sirbu F, Ion AC, Ion I. Study of the Optical and Acoustic Parameters and Surface Tensions of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea in Binary Mixtures with Different Organic Solvents between (293.15 and 323.15) K. Molecules. 2024; 29(19):4521. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sirbu, Florinela, Alina Catrinel Ion, and Ion Ion. 2024. "Study of the Optical and Acoustic Parameters and Surface Tensions of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea in Binary Mixtures with Different Organic Solvents between (293.15 and 323.15) K" Molecules 29, no. 19: 4521. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194521

APA Style

Sirbu, F., Ion, A. C., & Ion, I. (2024). Study of the Optical and Acoustic Parameters and Surface Tensions of 3,4,4′-Trichlorodiphenylurea in Binary Mixtures with Different Organic Solvents between (293.15 and 323.15) K. Molecules, 29(19), 4521. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29194521

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop