Physicochemical Characteristics of Residual Carbon and Inorganic Minerals in Coal Gasification Fine Slag
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Physicochemical Characteristics
2.1.1. Proximate and Ultimate Analysis
2.1.2. Ash Composition Analysis
2.1.3. RC Content Analysis
2.1.4. Particle Size Distributions
2.1.5. Pore Structure
2.1.6. Surface Characteristics
2.1.7. Mineral Constituents and Functional Groups
Year | Gasifier Types | Carbon Contents (%) | Ash Compositions | Mineral Compositions | Main Conclusions about Physicochemical Characteristics of FS, RC, and SPs |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 [28] | Entrained-flow coal–water slurry gasifier | 38.71 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Mainly in quartz, containing a small amount of lime | FS with a size > 180 μm showed the lowest degree of graphitization; FS in the range of 75–180 μm contained the most residual carbon; FS with a size < 45 μm exhibited the least roughness |
2023 [27] | Entrained-flow coal–water slurry gasifier | 25.17 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Mainly in anhydrite, quartz, and hematite | RC in FS was mainly distributed in the semimolten flocs; FS contained a lot of Si-O bonds and Al-O bonds, leading to a negative charge on the mineral surface |
2022 [38] | Opposed multi-burner coal–water slurry gasifier | 16.83 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Mainly in quartz and nepheline | FS with a size > 115 μm and in the range of 38–75 μm contained the most residual carbon with a higher degree of disorder; FS in the range of 75–115 μm and 0–38 μm mainly contained small-sized spherical mineral particles, which tended to adhere to the pore interior of the large-sized RC |
2022 [16] | Four-nozzle coal–water slurry gasifier | 18.74 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Mainly in amorphous phase and a minor proportion of crystal phase (mainly quartz) | Distribution modes of RC–ash: discrete distribution, embedded distribution, crosslinked distribution, and association and bonding; RC contained a hierarchical microporous/mesoporous/macroporous structure |
2022 [44] | Entrained-flow coal–water slurry gasifier | 29.50 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Amorphous aluminosilicate 96.8%, quartz 1.4%, calcite 1.8% | RC content increased with the increase in the particle size; Many inorganic spherical particles adhered to the surface and inner pores of RC; A few carbons had melted and were wrapped inside the inorganic microspheres |
2021 [45] | Entrained-flow coal–water slurry gasifier | 17.7 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, and CaO | Mainly in glass and amorphous phase, containing quartz crystals | FS appeared to be small fragmented spheres; Many heavy metals were more concentrated in FS |
2020 [15] | Entrained-flow pulverized coal gasifier | 17.8 | Mainly consisted of SiO2 and Al2O3 followed by Fe2O3 and CaO, which were approximately 7% and 8%, respectively | Mainly in amorphous aluminosilicate and a small amount of quartz | FS contained mostly amorphous aluminosilicate, together with a small amount of crystal quartz; RC contained a low degree of crystalline order; RC content increased with a particle size between 23 and 120 mm. |
2020 [46] | Entrained-flow coal–water slurry gasifier | 30.0 | Mainly consisted of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, and CaO | Mainly in quartz, augite, and feldspar | The composition of FS with different size ranges showed significant differences; A significant difference in the number and size of glassy particles between the high-carbon and high-ash fractions |
2.1.8. In Situ Morphology Analysis
2.1.9. Summary
2.2. The Mass Ratio of Carbon, Ash, and Carbon–Ash Combination Particles
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Material Preparation
3.2. Experimental Apparatus and Methods
3.2.1. Loss on Burning Analysis
3.2.2. Particle Size Analysis
3.2.3. Pore Structure Analysis
3.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
3.2.5. Mineral Phase and Functional Group Analysis
3.2.6. In Situ Morphology Change Analysis
3.2.7. Mass Ratio of Carbon, Ash, and Carbon–Ash Combination Particles
4. Conclusions
- (1)
- The RC, which acted as a framework in the FS, had a rough, loose surface and a well-developed pore structure while the SPs were composed of smaller spherical particles with a smooth surface.
- (2)
- The existence forms of RC and SPs in the FS were mainly in the form of dispersed uneven carbon, dispersed spherical SPs, agglomerated SPs, and SPs adhering within the pores of the RC. The presence of carbon–ash combination particles increased the difficulty of separation. Therefore, choosing an economical and low-energy-consuming method for its pretreatment to promote the efficient dissociation of carbon–ash combination particles is necessary;
- (3)
- The sieving pretreatment process facilitated the enrichment of the RC in the FS. The unburned RC content showed significant dependencies according to the FS particle size. With the increase in the FS particle size, the RC content showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing;
- (4)
- Utilizing the high-temperature heating stage coupled with an optical microscope (HTSOM) allowed for the determination of the mass percentage of dispersed carbon, dispersed ash, and carbon–ash combined particles in a specific range of particle sizes, thus providing fundamental data and reliable guidance for further separation processes.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shen, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, H. Outlook of Energy Storage via Large-Scale Entrained Flow Coal Gasification. Engineering 2023, 29, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Hu, W.; Feng, G.; Zhao, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Ma, J. Study on the excitation effect and mechanism of coal gasification slag based on solid waste. Powder Technol. 2024, 435, 119460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, S.; Xuan, W.; Cao, C.; Zhang, J. A review of sustainable utilization and prospect of coal gasification slag. Environ Res. 2023, 238, 117186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, F.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, W.; Guo, Y.; Guo, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J. Review on the attribute cognition and carbon-ash-water separation of coal gasification fine slag. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 320, 124121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Yu, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, L.; Li, J.; Qu, C.; Wang, T. Study on Extraction Valuable Metal Elements by Co-Roasting Coal Gangue with Coal Gasification Coarse Slag. Molecules 2023, 29, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, X.; Zeng, C.; Mao, Y.; Li, W.; Peng, Y.; Wang, T.; Eiteneer, B.; Zamansky, V.; Fletcher, T. The surface characteristics and reactivity of residual carbon in coal gasification slag. Energy Fuels 2010, 24, 91–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, F.; Wei, C. Effects of decarbonized coal gasification coarse slag and fine ash on properties of cement paste as supplementary cementitious materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2022, 34, 04022281. [Google Scholar]
- Dai, G.; Zheng, S.; Wang, X.; Bai, Y.; Dong, Y.; Du, J.; Sun, X.; Tan, H. Combustibility analysis of high-carbon fine slags from an entrained flow gasifier. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 271, 111009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, R.; Qiu, G.; Jia, W.; Guo, Y.; Guo, F.; Wu, J. Synthesis of porous material from coal gasification fine slag residual carbon and its application in removal of methylene blue. Molecules 2021, 26, 6116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Ren, L.; Zhang, G.; Gong, Y.; Guo, Q.; Yu, G. Synthesis of N/Fe/S-Codoped Cathode Catalysts on Gasification Residue Carbon for Zinc–Air Batteries. Energy Fuels 2024, 38, 4676–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, N.; Zhao, A.; Hu, Z.; Tan, K.; Zhang, J. Preparation and application of porous materials from coal gasification slag for wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Chen, H.; He, R. Structure characteristics and composition of hydration products of coal gasification slag mixed cement and lime. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 213, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.; Li, W.; Wang, W.; Zhou, L.; Guo, S.; Ren, Q. Experimental investigation on thermal modification and burnout of residual carbon in coal gasification fine slag. Energy 2024, 295, 131162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, R.; Zhou, A.; Zhang, N.; Guo, K.; Cheng, M.; Chen, H.; Li, C. Structural properties of residual carbon in coal gasification fine slag and their influence on flotation separation and resource utilization: A review. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2024, 31, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miao, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Guo, F.; Guo, Z.; Guo, Y. Chemical characterizations of different sized mineral-rich particles in fine slag from Entrained-flow gasification. Adv. Powder Technol. 2020, 31, 3715–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, Y.; Xu, J.; Miao, Z.; Guo, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J. Distribution modes of residual carbon and ash in coal gasification fine slag and its feasibility analysis as particle electrodes. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, B.; Chai, X.; Deng, X.; Jiao, F.; Fang, C.; Xing, B. Recovery of residual carbon from coal gasification fine slag by a combined gravity separation-flotation process. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 348, 119351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathy, A.; Bagchi, S.; Biswal, S.K.; Meikap, B.C. Effect of fin type baffle on the particle hydrodynamics, separation and misplacement in a liquid solid fluidized bed separator. Adv. Powder Technol. 2019, 30, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; ur Rahman, Z.; Shi, Z.; Bai, Y.; Wang, G.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, L. Enrichment of residual carbon from coal gasification fine slag by spiral separator. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 315, 115149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Cheng, M.; Han, R.; Li, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, A. Innovative flotation separation considering pores blocking to facilitate residual carbon recovery from coal gasification fine slag. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 310, 123254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Liu, D.; Tu, Y.; Jin, L.; Wang, H. Enrichment of residual carbon in entrained-flow gasification coal fine slag by ultrasonic flotation. Fuel 2020, 278, 118195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, W.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Mu, W.; Fu, X. Research on grinding and flotation decarbonization of coal gasification fine slag. Fuel 2024, 365, 131136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Z.; Yang, C.; Dong, L.; Bao, W.; Wang, J.; Fan, P. Recent advances and conceptualizations in process intensification of coal gasification fine slag flotation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 304, 122394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 212-2008; Proximate Analysis of Coal. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
- GB/T 476-2008; Determination of Carbon and Hydrogen in Coal. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2008.
- Shi, X.; Chu, M.; Sun, X.; Lyu, F.; Dong, J.; Liu, Y. Characteristics of particle size classification and classified separation for coal gasification fine slag. Energy Sources Part A 2024, 46, 3097–3109. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, C.; Li, X.; Lyu, J.; He, M.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; You, X. Study on characteristics of coal gasification fine slag-coal water slurry slurrying, combustion, and ash fusion. Fuel 2023, 332, 126039. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.; Lv, P.; Ma, H.; Bai, Y.; Wang, J.; Su, W.; Song, X.; Yu, G. Study on physicochemical properties, distribution modes, and formation mechanism of coal gasification fine slag in an industrial entrained-flow gasifier. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 299, 120509. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Yuan, L.; Qiao, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Zeng, L.; Li, Z. Effects of flotation and acid treatment on unburned carbon recovery from atmospheric circulating fluidized bed coal gasification fine ash and application evaluation of residual carbon. Waste Manag. 2021, 136, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ren, L.; Ding, L.; Guo, Q.; Gong, Y.; Yu, G.; Wang, F. Characterization, carbon-ash separation and resource utilization of coal gasification fine slag: A comprehensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 398, 136554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, C.; Liang, Q.; Guo, X.; Dai, Z.; Liu, H.; Gong, X. Characteristics of different sized slag particles from entrained-flow coal gasification. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Wei, C.; Liu, X. Application of gasification slag in construction materials and high value-added materials: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 402, 133013. [Google Scholar]
- Senneca, O.; Urciuolo, M.; Chirone, R. A semidetailed model of primary fragmentation of coal. Fuel 2013, 104, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Jin, Z.; Jing, Y.; Fan, P.; Qi, Z.; Bao, W.; Wang, J.; Yan, X.; Lv, P.; Dong, L. Review of the characteristics and graded utilisation of coal gasification slag. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 35, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Qiu, G.; Li, Y.; Niu, Y.; Xu, J.; Jia, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Guo, F. Processing of coal gasification fine slag by different physical separation methods: Fate of typical heavy metals and comparison analysis on products. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 306, 122675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Gu, S.; Liu, D.; Xu, Z.; Wang, W.; Tu, Y.; Liu, H.; Lu, S. Enrichment of residual carbon in coal gasification fine slag via wet sieving separation with ultrasonic pretreatment. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 40306–40315. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Xu, J.; Qiu, G.; Jia, W.; Wu, J.; Guo, F. Multifaceted evaluation of distribution, occurrence, and leaching features of typical heavy metals in different-sized coal gasification fine slag from Ningdong region, China: A case study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 831, 154726. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Guo, Z.; Miao, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wu, J.; Guo, F. Comparative study on the structure characteristics, combustion reactivity, and potential environmental impacts of coal gasification fine slag with different particle size fractions. Fuel 2022, 311, 122493. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X.; Guo, X.; Gong, X. Characterization of slag from entrained-flow coal gasificaion. J. East China Univ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 35, 677–683. [Google Scholar]
- Kong, L.; Bai, J.; Li, W. Viscosity-temperature property of coal ash slag at the condition of entrained flow gasification: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 215, 106751. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, Z.; Dong, L.; Fan, X.; Ren, Z.; Liu, X.; Fan, P.; Fan, M.; Bao, W.; Wang, J. Physical and chemical properties of coal gasification fine slag and its carbon products by hydrophobic-hydrophilic separation. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 16484–16493. [Google Scholar]
- Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution. Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, R.; Li, D.; Tian, Q.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. Intensification of flotation separation process of residual carbon from coal gasification fine slag using ultrafine carbon particles conditioning. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2024, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, D.; Zhang, J.; Hou, X.; Li, S.; Li, H.; He, F.; Zhu, G. Occurrence mode and molecular structure model of unburned carbon in coal gasification fine slags. Fuel 2022, 323, 124364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.; Xie, C.R.; Luo, C.L.; Meng, W.; Yang, G.; Yu, G.S.; Gong, Y.; Xu, M.; Wu, T. Distribution and modes of occurrence of heavy metals in opposed multi-burner coal-water-slurry gasification plants. Fuel 2021, 303, 121163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Chu, M.; Shi, X.; Lyu, F.; Sun, X.; Jia, C. Grading characteristics of texaco gasification fine slag: Quality distinction and selective distribution of trace elements. ACS Omega. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 26883–26893. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Sample | Proximate Analysis (wt.%) | Ultimate Analysis (wt.%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mad | Ad | Vd | FCd | Cd | Hd | Nd | St,d | |
FS | 1.28 | 63.03 | 5.59 | 31.38 | 35.08 | 0.65 | 0.20 | 0.91 |
RC | 1.75 | 3.22 | 4.50 | 92.28 | 91.68 | 0.71 | 0.57 | 1.02 |
Sample | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | SO3 | TiO2 | K2O | ClO2 | P2O5 | Others |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FS | 29.51 | 16.33 | 21.71 | 14.1 | 8.06 | 5.16 | 0.86 | 1.33 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 1.18 |
SP | 30.99 | 17.72 | 19.83 | 13.76 | 7.98 | 5.42 | 0.80 | 1.43 | 0.42 | 0.60 | 1.05 |
RC | 1.00 | 5.22 | 3.89 | 21.40 | 13.32 | 42.09 | 0.52 | 0.76 | 10.49 | 0.88 | 0.46 |
Mesh | Particle Size Range (mm) | Carbon Yield (%) | LOI (%) | Loss Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
<35 | >0.500 | 5.33 | 44.80 | 0.16 |
35–100 | 0.500–0.150 | 47.30 | 63.95 | |
100–200 | 0.150–0.075 | 20.67 | 39.42 | |
>200 | <0.075 | 26.54 | 16.90 |
Sample | BET Specific Surface Area (m2/g) | Total Pore Volume (cm3/g) | Microporous Volume (cm3/g) |
---|---|---|---|
FS | 300.30 | 0.37 | 0.14 |
RC | 571.52 | 0.61 | 0.29 |
SP | 12.08 | 0.13 | 0.01 |
Number | Area Shrinkage (%) | 0.075–0.150 mm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Carbon Content (%) | Density (g/cm3) | Mass Ratio (%) | ||
1 | <20 | 3.00 | 2.72 | 38.72 |
2 | 20–40 | 33.54 | 2.40 | 32.42 |
3 | 40–60 | 56.60 | 2.22 | 6.31 |
4 | 60–80 | 78.39 | 2.07 | 7.36 |
5 | >80 | 97.00 | 1.94 | 15.19 |
Total | - | 39.92 | 2.38 | 100.00 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, L.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Peng, Z.; Han, C.; Lian, W.; Xue, B.; Gao, C.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, W. Physicochemical Characteristics of Residual Carbon and Inorganic Minerals in Coal Gasification Fine Slag. Molecules 2024, 29, 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163956
Li L, Liu J, Li X, Peng Z, Han C, Lian W, Xue B, Gao C, Zhang Q, Huang W. Physicochemical Characteristics of Residual Carbon and Inorganic Minerals in Coal Gasification Fine Slag. Molecules. 2024; 29(16):3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163956
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Le, Jing Liu, Xiangyang Li, Zeyu Peng, Chun Han, Wenhao Lian, Bin Xue, Chenmin Gao, Qian Zhang, and Wei Huang. 2024. "Physicochemical Characteristics of Residual Carbon and Inorganic Minerals in Coal Gasification Fine Slag" Molecules 29, no. 16: 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163956
APA StyleLi, L., Liu, J., Li, X., Peng, Z., Han, C., Lian, W., Xue, B., Gao, C., Zhang, Q., & Huang, W. (2024). Physicochemical Characteristics of Residual Carbon and Inorganic Minerals in Coal Gasification Fine Slag. Molecules, 29(16), 3956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29163956