Next Article in Journal
Heme–Protein Interactions and Functional Relevant Heme Deformations: The Cytochrome c Case
Next Article in Special Issue
Metal–Organic Frameworks–Based Memristors: Materials, Devices, and Applications
Previous Article in Journal
PEEK and Hyaluronan-Based 3D Printed Structures: Promising Combination to Improve Bone Regeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semi-Embedding Zn-Co3O4 Derived from Hybrid ZIFs into Wood-Derived Carbon for High-Performance Supercapacitors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 27
Issue 24
10.3390/molecules27248750
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multi-Responsive Sensor Based on Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Ions and Dopamine Molecules

by
Faqiang Chen
1,
Hui Xu
1,*,
Youlie Cai
2,
Wei Zhang
1,
Penglei Shen
1,
Wenhua Zhang
3,
Hangqing Xie
1,
Gongxun Bai
1,
Shiqing Xu
1 and
Junkuo Gao
2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Optoelectronic Materials and Devices of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Collage of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
Institute of Functional Porous Materials, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Materials and Textiles, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3
Technical Center of Hangzhou Customs, Hangzhou 310016, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2022, 27(24), 8750; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248750
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Revised: 2 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 December 2022 / Published: 9 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Multifunctional Metal-Organic Framework Materials)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs), as an emerging porous material, have attracted increasing research interest in fluorescence sensing due to their inherent fluorescence emission units with unique physicochemical properties. Herein, based on the organic building block 3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis-(4-carboxyphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (H4TCBP), the porous material HOF-TCBP was successfully synthesized using hydrogen bond self-assembly in a DMF solution. The fluorescence properties of the HOF-TCBP solution showed that when the concentration was high, excimers were easily formed, the PL emission was red-shifted, and the fluorescence intensity became weaker. HOF-TCBP showed good sensitivity and selectivity to metal ions Fe3+, Cr3+, and anion Cr2O72−. In addition, HOF-TCBP can serve as a label-free fluorescent sensor material for the sensitive and selective detection of dopamine (DA). HOF-based DA sensing is actually easy, low-cost, simple to operate, and highly selective for many potential interfering substances, and it has been successfully applied to the detection of DA in biological samples with satisfactory recoveries (101.1–104.9%). To our knowledge, this is the first report of HOF materials for efficient detection of the neurotransmitter dopamine in biological fluids. In short, this work widely broadens the application of HOF materials as fluorescent sensors for the sensing of ions and biological disease markers.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs) are a class of crystalline porous materials self-assembled by organic molecules units through hydrogen bonding interactions [1,2,3,4,5]. In addition to hydrogen bonding interactions, there are other non-covalent interactions, such as electrostatic interactions, π–π stacking, and other intermolecular forces such as van der Waals forces, which also play an important role in the construction and stability of HOFs [6,7,8]. The rational construction of HOFs with permanent porosity and the utilization of large π-conjugated system aromatics with highly rigid organic molecules as the building blocks of HOFs usually exhibit excellent fluorescence properties, making them promising luminescent materials [9,10,11]. Due to the weak, flexible, reversible, and directional force of hydrogen bonding, HOFs have excellent solid solution processing properties, structural flexibility, and easy recrystallization and recovery [12,13,14]. In addition, this material has the advantages of large specific surface area, mild synthesis conditions, good biocompatibility, and low cytotoxicity [15,16,17,18,19,20]. The porosity and large specific surface area of HOFs materials help to fully contact the analyte, facilitate interactions with guest molecules, thereby improving detection sensitivity. The differential recognition of binding sites makes it highly selective. Therefore, it has a good prospect in luminescence sensing. Several pioneering applications have been explored in the past decade, including gas storage and separation [16,21,22,23], chiral separation and structure determination [7], heterogeneous catalysis [24,25], sensing [26,27], and proton conduction [28,29]. Although the detection of metal ions, anions in nature, and disease markers in biological systems has attracted more and more attention and research by scientists [30,31,32], there are few related reports on HOFs-based fluorescence sensors.
One of the indispensable elements in the human body is chromium. Chromium plays a very important role in many areas of industrial production [33,34,35]. For Cr(III) cation, it is an important and essential biological element and is widely used in practical industrial production. However, excess Cr(III) ions will combine with DNA to generate genetic mutations [36]. Iron is an important transition metal element and is present in all aspects of life. At the same time, it plays a vital role in various aspects, such as biology and the environment. Most importantly, iron is the most abundant as well as versatile transition metal in human cellular systems and is involved in a variety of proteins and enzymes that play different important roles, such as oxygen metabolism, electron transport, oxygen uptake, and transcriptional regulation [37]. Iron concentration is an important aspect of human health, as lower or higher iron concentrations may lead to endotoxemia, gastrointestinal disturbances, and decreased immunity. Excessive Fe3+ in drinking water may cause many problems related to human health. It is suggested that the indicator of Fe3+ in water is 0.3 ppm, so the selective detection of Fe3+ is of great significance to human health and the environment [38].
Dopamine (DA) is a catecholamine neurotransmitter that plays an important role in the central nervous system and cardiovascular system [39,40]. It controls many biological functions such as emotion, motivation, motor control, cognition, and endocrine regulation [41,42]. Abnormal concentrations of DA in organisms can lead to various neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Considering that compared with traditional detection methods, such as chemiluminescence [43], electrochemical [44], high performance liquid chromatography [45], and capillary electrophoresis [46], the use of a fluorescence method has the advantages of high sensitivity, low cost, high practicability, easy operation, and selection.
In this work, we report a porous material HOF-TCBP, which is composed of organic building unit 3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis-(4-carboxyphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (H4TCBP) and connected by hydrogen bond. HOF-TCBP exhibits good sensitivity and selectivity towards metal ions Fe3+, Cr3+ and anion Cr2O72−. Moreover, HOF-TCBP also functions as a label-free fluorescence-based sensor material for the sensitive and selective detection of dopamine. The sensing of DA based on HOF is practically facile, low-cost, and shows adequate performance for biological samples. To the best of our knowledge, there have been very few HOF-based sensors achieve the sensing of metal ions and anions, and this is the first report of HOF material for highly efficient sensing of neurotransmitter dopamine in biological fluids.

2. Results and Discussion

The porous HOF material HOF-TCBP was prepared according to previous reports [13]. Synthesis of HOF-TCBP by organic building molecule H4TCBP by self-assembly in DMF solution. The porous HOF-TCBP material crystallizes in the orthorhombic Fddd space group with a 5-fold interpenetrating three-dimensional (3D) framework structure. In the crystal structure, due to the rotation of the C-C bond between the two benzene rings in the organic building unit H4TCBP biphenyl, the two benzene rings are not in the same plane, so the H4TCBP molecule presents a twisted tetrahedral configuration. Each H4TCBP molecule is connected to the carboxylic acid hydrogen bonds on the adjacent H4TCBP molecules through carboxylic acid hydrogen bonds on the four outer benzene rings, resulting in a robust 3D porous framework (Figure 1a). It has one-dimensional porous channel along the a-axis direction. Among them, the rhombohedral channed aperture is 17.81 × 26.34 Å. The solvent filling space of HOF-TCBP is calculated to be 56% of the total crystal volume. The BET surface area is 2066 m2g−1 [13]. The diffraction peaks of the experimentally synthesized samples are consistent with the PXRD patterns of the simulated structures (Figure 1b), indicating that the synthesized samples are pure phase. The morphology of HOF-TCBP was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Figure 1c,d), and the results showed that the synthesized samples were rod-shaped with the length of about several micrometers.
The HOF-TCBP solid powder shows photoluminescence (PL) characteristics at 392 nm, which is basically consistent with the fluorescence peak of organic construction molecule H4TCBP. The fluorescence characteristics of HOF-TCBP can be attributed to the fluorescence of organic construction molecule H4TCBP (Figure 2a). For HOF-TCBP solution dispersed in ethanol, it shows a strong fluorescence emission peak of 359 nm, which is about 33 nm blue shift compared with the emission peak of HOF-TCBP solid powder. This may be due to the fact that HOF-TCBP in liquid is relatively dispersed and the stacking effect is not obvious while HOF-TCBP in solid powder is densely stacked to form excimer, which leads to the red shifted PL compared with HOF-TCBP dispersed in ethanol. The pioneering work have illustrated the excimer formation phenomenon in several MOFs [47,48,49,50,51], it is noteworthy that this is the first work reporting the excimer formation in HOF materials.
The PL of different concentration of HOF-TCBP in ethanol was examined to illustrate the influence of solution concentration on the PL of this HOF (Figure 2b). When the concentration of HOF-TCBP suspension is 1.58 × 10−3 M, its emission peak is located at 369 nm. The PL emission blue-shifts with the dilution of the suspension concentration. When the HOF-TCBP suspension was gradually diluted, the emission peak blue-shifts to approximately 359 nm and basically remains unchanged. When the concentration is high, it is easy to form excimer, and the PL emission is red shift and the fluorescence intensity becomes weak. With the decrease of suspension concentration, the fluorescence intensity first increased with a small blue-shift of the fluorescence peak, which can be attributed to the excimer formation gradually diminished. When the concentration is 7.88 × 10−4 M, the fluorescence intensity reaches the strongest, and then the fluorescence intensity decreases, which can be attributed to the dilution of HOF-TCBP suspension.
Based on the above analysis, we selected the strong emission HOF-TCBP suspension with the concentration of 7.88 × 10−4 M to examine its potential application in metal ions sensing. The addition of a small amount of different metal ions to the HOF-TCBP ethanol solution lead to different degrees of change in the luminescence intensity. Analytes such as Ca2+, K+, Cd2+, Al3+ show no significant effect on the luminescence intensity of HOF-TCBP suspension, but the addition of Co2+, Cu2+, Zr4+ and Sc3+ ions quench the luminescence of HOF-TCBP suspension to varying degrees. In addition, there is a slight red shift of the emission peak after the addition of Zr4+ and Sc3+ ions (Supplementary Materials Figures S1–S8). The red-shift is about 15 nm and 17 nm, respectively. The quenching effects of different metal ions on HOF-TCBP are Cr3+ > Fe3+ > Cu2+ > Sc3+ > Zr4+ > Co2+ (Supplementary Materials Figure S9). Especially when Cr3+ and Fe3+ ions were added, HOF-TCBP suspension showed a significant PL quenching effect (Figure 3a,c). When the concentrations of Cr3+ and Fe3+ were 2.44 × 10−5 M and 3.85 × 10−5 M respectively, the fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP could be quenched by more than 50%. When Cr3+ with a concentration of 9.09 × 10−5 M and Fe3+ with concentration of 1.03 × 10−4 M were added, the fluorescence of HOF-TCBP could be almost completely quenched. The HOF-TCBP material shows excellent sensing performance towards Cr3+ and Fe3+, and the detection limit reaches 0.689 μM and 2.516 μM (≈36 ppb and 141 ppb) (Supplementary Materials Figures S10 and S11), respectively, showing comparable or lower detection limits compared with previously reported MOF luminescent materials or other probes (Supplementary Materials Tables S1 and S2). The quenching efficiency of Cr3+ and Fe3+ ions can be quantitatively explained with the Stern Volmer equation I0/I = 1 + KSV [Q]. Where I0 is the fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP ethanol solution, I is the fluorescence intensity after adding Cr3+ or Fe3+ ions, and [Q] is the concentration of Cr3+ or Fe3+ ions. It is worth noting that the HOF-TCBP solution has a linear relationship with Cr3+ and Fe3+ ions in the low concentration range. As shown in Figure 3b,d, the ion quenching coefficients Ksv of Cr3+ and Fe3+ are about 8.50 × 104 M−1 and 3.01 × 104 M−1, respectively.
In addition, we also examined the sensing properties of HOF-TCBP towards different anions. When a small amount of Cr2O72− was added, the PL emission of HOF-TCBP was significantly quenched (Figure 4a) while there was no significant change with the addition of other anions, such as Ac−, Br−, Cl−, CO32−, F−, HPO42−, SiO32−, SO32−, and SO42− (Figure 4b). The fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP solution was linearly related to the amount of Cr2O72− added in the low concentration range. This relationship can be explained by the stern Volmer equation. The calculated quenching coefficient Ksv is about 3.62 × 104 M−1 (Supplementary Materials Figure S12), and the detection limit is 1.638 μM (≈0.35 ppm) (Supplementary Materials Figure S13). It exhibits a superior detection limit over some previously reported luminescent materials (Supplementary Materials Table S3). We further studied the selective detection of Cr2O72− in the presence of other anions and carried out the anti-interference experiments. The results showed that in the presence of other analytes, such as Ac−, Br−, Cl−, CO32−, F−, HPO42−, SiO32−, SO32−, SO42−, etc., Cr2O72− still effectively quenched the fluorescence emission of HOF-TCBP. The decrease of fluorescence intensity indicates that HOF-TCBP also has a good ability to selectively detect Cr2O72− in the presence of other anions (Supplementary Materials Figures S14–S22).
The addition of Cr3+, Fe3+, and Cr2O72− ions led to the fluorescence quenching of HOF-TCBP solution, while the XRD patterns of HOF-TCBP powder soaked with Cr3+, Fe3+, and Cr2O72− ions were consistent with the original pattern (Supplementary Materials Figure S23), indicating that the framework of HOF-TCBP does not collapse after the addition of Cr3+, Fe3+, and Cr2O72− ions. According to the FT-IR spectrum (Supplementary Materials Figure S24), the peak positions of HOF-TCBP before and after immersion of metal ions are consistent, indicating that there is no new chemical bond formation after the addition of the metal ions. Further study of a fluorescence lifetime can distinguish static quenching and dynamic quenching. When the analyte is added, the fluorescence lifetime is basically unchanged, which is static quenching; with fluorescence lifetime decay, the quenching process is considered to be dynamic. As shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S25, the fluorescence lifetime remains basically unchanged after adding the analyte (Cr3+, Fe3+, Cr2O72−). This indicates that static quenching is dominant. We speculate that the mechanism of fluorescence quenching is fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and light induced electron transfer (PET). The absorption spectra of Fe3+ and Cr2O72− effectively overlap with the excitation and emission spectra of HOF-TCBP (Supplementary Materials Figure S26), indicating that the quenching mechanism of HOF-TCBP after adding Fe3+ and Cr2O72− may be attributed to competitive absorption and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. It is observed that the fluorescence quenching degree after adding Fe3+ and Cr2O72− is similar (Figure 3c and Figure 4a), while the effective overlap area between Cr2O72− absorption spectrum and HOF-TCBP emission spectrum is larger than that of Fe3+, so there may be other mechanisms for the quenching effect of Fe3+ to HOF-TCBP. The 3d orbit of Fe3+ is half full [52], which makes it easy to absorb electrons, thus electron transfer may also contributes to the fluorescence quenching for Fe3+. For Cr3+ ions, there is almost no spectral overlap, excluding the quenching mechanism of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and competitive absorption. Cr3+ show strong ability to gain an electron [53], thus the quenching mechanism of Cr3+ may be electron transfer.
Because HOFs materials show the characteristics of good biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity, we also explore the dopamine fluorescence detection application of HOF-TCBP materials. Dopamine (DA) is an important neurotransmitter, which plays an important physiological role in the function of nervous system [39,40]. Many related cognitive impairment diseases are related to the abnormal concentration of DA in the brain. Therefore, the research on the detection of DA is very important for the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease [54]. A series of dopamine fluorescence titration experiments were carried out in HOF-TCBP aqueous solution with pH = 2–6. The addition of a small amount of DA effectively quenched the fluorescence emission of HOF-TCBP. In different pH environments, HOF-TCBP shows similar quenching effect towards DA (Figures S27–S31). The fluorescence sensing of DA is further studied in the environment of pH = 6. When adding 1.48 × 10−4 M DA to HOF-TCBP solution, the fluorescence intensity can be quenched to half of the original intensity; when 5.21 × 10−4 M DA was added, the fluorescence quenching degree reached almost 90% (Figure 5a). While the other analytes, such as cysteine, phenylalanine, glutamic acid, urea, glucose, tryptophan, and aspartic acid, show negligible fluorescence intensity to HOF-TCBP (Figure 5b). Therefore, HOF-TCBP shows excellent selectivity for DA. The detection limit (LOD) of HOF-TCBP to DA is 36.57 mM (Supplementary Materials Figure S32), and the quenching coefficient Ksv value is 9.78 × 104 M−1 (Supplementary Materials Figure S33). Interestingly, as shown in Supplementary Materials Figure S34, the fluorescence intensity changed with time. After adding DA, the fluorescence intensity was rapidly quenched within 10 s, and the fluorescence intensity remained basically unchanged after 40 s. Therefore, the response of HOF-TCBP to DA is very fast.
From the above knowledge, the fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP decreased after the addition of DA, while the XRD pattern of HOF-TCBP powder with a large amount of (1.0 × 10−2 M) DA was the same as the original (Supplementary Materials Figure S35), indicating that the backbone of HOF-TCBP does not collapse. In different acidic environments, the FT-IR spectra of HOF-TCBP immersed in DA solution were consistent with those of HOF-TCBP not immersed in DA solution, indicating that no new chemical bonds were formed (Supplementary Materials Figure S36). The fluorescence lifetime curve shows that the fluorescence lifetime of HOF-TCBP exhibits subtle decrease after adding DA (Supplementary Materials Figure S37). Therefore, the dynamic collision effect may exist during the quenching process. The UV-Vis absorption spectrum of DA shows a small spectrum overlap with emission spectra of HOF-TCBP, while the adsorption spectrum shows partially spectrum overlap with the excitation spectrum of HOF-TCBP (Supplementary Materials Figure S38), indicating that there may exist competitive absorption and fluorescence resonance energy transfer between DA and HOF-TCBP, which results from the fluorescence quenching of HOF-TCBP. The one-dimensional porous channels in the HOF-TCBP structure, and the high specific surface area increases the contact opportunities with target molecules such as DA, thereby improving the detection sensitivity and response speed.
In order to evaluate the feasibility of the sensing experiment in biological samples, target analytes were detected in real samples of fetal bovine serum. The fetal bovine serum was added with different concentrations of DA, and the content of DA in the actual samples was analyzed and determined by the standard addition method. As shown in Table 1, the recoveries of DA in fetal bovine serum samples ranged from 101.1% to 104.9% with acceptable RSD values, demonstrating that HOF-TCBP can be used for quantitative detection of DA in serum.

3. Experimental

3.1. Materials and Methods

All chemicals were obtained commercially and used without further processing and purification. Dopamine (98%), L-cysteine (99%), L-phenylalanine (99%), L-glutamic acid (99%), Urea (99%), D-glucose (99%), L-tryptophan (99%), L-aspartic acid (99%), and N, N-dimethylformamide (AR, 99.5%) were purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of HOF-TCBP were measured with an X-ray diffractometer (D2 PHASER) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) at a scan rate of 5°/min and a scan range of 5°–50°. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images were obtained with a MODEL SU8010, Hitachi. The PL spectrum were obtained with an F4600 fluorescence spectrometer. FT-IR was carried out on a Nicolet iS50 spectrometer from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). UV-Vis absorption spectrum was recorded on Shimadzu UV-3600 spectrometer.

3.2. Synthesis

Synthesis of HOF-TCBP

The 3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis-(4-carboxyphenyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (H4TCBP) (100 mg, 0.158 mmol) and DMF (0.7 mL) were added to a 20 mL vial. After 10 min of sonication, it was allowed to stand for several days, and the liquid slowly evaporated and crystallized. Then, 0.5 mL of DMF were added to dissolve it, and 5 mL of acetone was added for anti-dissolving, mixed well, and filtered. Finally, it was washed several times with acetone and air-dried to obtain a white powder.

3.3. Metal Ions Sensing

In metal ion sensing experiments, a 10 mg HOF-TCBP powder sample was weighed then dispersed into 200 mL of an ethanol solvent, and after sonication for 30 min, a HOF-TCBP suspension was obtained. A series of nitrate solutions A(NO3)x (10−3M, A = Ca2+, K+, Cd2+, Al3+, Co2+, Zr4+, Sc3+, Cu2+, Fe3+, Cr3+) was prepared according to the titration method, 2 mL of the HOF-TCBP suspension was gradually added, and then the fluorescence spectrum (excitation wavelength: 304 nm, monitoring wavelength: 359 nm) was measured.

3.4. Anion Sensing

For the anion sensing experiments, the sodium salt aqueous solutions of Ac−, Br−, Cl−, CO32−, F−, HPO42−, SiO32−, SO32−, SO42−, and Cr2O72− with a concentration of 10−3 M were first prepared, and then different amounts of the above stock solutions were added to 2 mL HOF-TCBP suspension, respectively; the luminescence data was collected after standing overnight. In the anti-interference experiment of Cr2O72−, 230 μL of another nine anion solutions were added to 2 mL HOF-TCBP suspension, and then the Cr2O72− solution was added incrementally, and the luminescence data was collected after standing overnight (excitation wavelength: 304 nm, monitoring wavelength: 359 nm).

3.5. Dopamine Sensing

A DA stock solution was prepared at a concentration of 10 mM. Meanwhile, the HOF-TCBP samples were dispersed in a phosphate buffer solution (5 mg/100 mL) with pH 2–6, respectively, and ultrasonically treated for 30 min. Then, 2 mL HOF-TCBP suspensions with different pH were taken respectively, and the DA solution was added dropwise in order to measure the fluorescence spectrum (excitation wavelength: 330 nm, monitoring wavelength: 397 nm). In addition, seven solutions were also prepared at a concentration of 10 mM, cysteine (Cys), phenylalanine (Phe), glutamic acid (Glu), urea (Urea), glucose (Glc), tryptophan (Trp), and aspartic acid (Asp) were added to 2 mL HOF-TCBP suspension at pH = 6, respectively, and the fluorescence was measured for selectivity experiments. The fetal bovine serum was diluted 30-fold before the measurement of the real sample fetal bovine serum.

4. Conclusions

In summary, a porous HOF-TCBP was synthesized using a solvent diffusion method. Interestingly, fluorescence detection experiments show that HOF-TCBP can be used as a multi-response luminescence sensor for the sensitive detection of metal ions Fe3+, Cr3+, and anion Cr2O72−, respectively, and HOF-TCBP maintains stability in a pH = 2–6 buffer solution, and selectively detects biomolecular DA through the shut-off effect. At the same time, the real sample fetal bovine serum was also verified, and the feasibility of the sensing experiment in biological samples was also verified. In addition, the characterization by PXRD, SEM, UV-vis, and FT-IR was carried out to investigate the mechanism of the interaction between HOF-TCBP and analytes. The quenching mechanism of HOF-TCBP by Fe3+ and Cr2O72− is mainly attributed to competitive absorption and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In addition, electron transfer is also a reason for the quenching of HOF-TCBP by Fe3+ and Cr3+. For DA, the quenching mechanism is mainly attributed to competitive absorption and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. This work further investigates the luminescence properties and sensing behaviors based on HOFs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27248750/s1, Figure S1. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Al3+; Figure S2. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Ca2+; Figure S3. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Cd2+; Figure S4. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Co2+; Figure S5. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Cu2+; Figure S6. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of K+; Figure S7. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Sc3+; Figure S8. The PL spectrum of HOF-TCBP with different amounts of Zr4+; Figure S9. The 359 nm emission intensity of HOF-TCBP ethanol solution with 1.0 × 10−3 M different metal ion; Figure S10. The fit curve of HOF-TCBP emission intensity at different Cr3+ concentrations; Figure S11. The fit curve of HOF-TCBP emission intensity at different Fe3+ concentrations; Figure S12. S–V plots of Cr2O72−; inset: the above figures are the linear fitting curves at low concentrations; Figure S13. The fit curve of HOF-TCBP emission intensity at different Cr2O72− concentrations; Figure S14. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding Ac− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S15. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding Br− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S16. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding Cl− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S17. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding CO32− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S18. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding F− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S19. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding HPO42− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S20. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding SiO32− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S21. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding SO32− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S22. The change of fluorescence intensity of HOF-TCBP after adding SO42− (230 μL, 10−3 M) and different contents of Cr2O72− (10−3 M); Figure S23. PXRD patterns of HOF-TCBP and HOF-TCBP immersed in Cr3+, Fe3+ and Cr2O72− aqueous solutions (10−3 M); Figure S24. FT-IR spectra of HOF-TCBP and HOF-TCBP immersed in Cr3+, Fe3+ and Cr2O72− aqueous solutions (10−3 M); Figure S25. HOF-TCBP fluorescence lifetimes monitored at 359 nm with and without ion addition; Figure S26. Absorption spectra of ions and excitation and emission spectra of HOF-TCBP; Figure S27. PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 2 buffer solution; Figure S28. PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 3 buffer solution; Figure S29. PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 4 buffer solution; Figure S30. PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 5 buffer solution; Figure S31. PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 6 buffer solution; Figure S32. The fit curve of HOF-TCBP emission intensity at different DA concentrations; Figure S33. S–V plots of DA; inset: the above figures are the linear fitting curves at low concentrations; Figure S34. After adding a certain concentration of DA, the luminescence intensity of HOF-TCBP suspension at 397 nm changes with time; Figure S36. FT-IR spectra of HOF-TCBP synthesized samples and immersed in pH = 2–6 buffer solution and DA solution (10−2 M); Figure S37. HOF-TCBP fluorescence lifetime monitored at 397 nm without and with DA addition; Figure S38. Absorption spectra of DA and excitation and emission spectra of HOF-TCBP; Table S1. Comparison of luminescent materials for detecting Fe3+ ion; Table S2. Comparison of luminescent materials for detecting Cr3+ ion; Table S3. Comparison of luminescent materials for detecting Cr2O72− ion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.X. (Hui Xu), G.B. and J.G.; Methodology, F.C., H.X. (Hui Xu), Y.C., H.X. (Hangqing Xie) and W.Z. (Wenhua Zhang); Resources, H.X. (Hui Xu), H.X. (Hangqing Xie), S.X. and J.G.; Writing—original draft preparation, F.C. and H.X. (Hui Xu); Visualization, F.C., W.Z. (Wei Zhang) and P.S.; Supervision, H.X. (Hui Xu) and J.G.; Funding acquisition, H.X. (Hui Xu) and J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province grant number [No. LY20E020001, LQ21E030005] And National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672251) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LY20E020001, LQ21E030005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672251) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hisaki, I.; Xin, C.; Takahashi, K.; Nakamura, T. Designing Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks (HOFs) with Permanent Porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 11160–11170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, B.; Lin, R.B.; Zhang, Z.J.; Xiang, S.C.; Chen, B.L. Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks as a Tunable Platform for Functional Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 14399–14416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Luo, J.; Wang, J.-W.; Zhang, J.-H.; Lai, S.; Zhong, D.-C. Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks: Design, structures and potential applications. CrystEngComm 2018, 20, 5884–5898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, J.Y.; Wang, J.K.; Hou, B.H.; Huang, X.; Wang, T.; Bao, Y.; Hao, H.X. Porous hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs): From design to potential applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, D.; Zhuang, G.; Kirlikovali, K.O.; Li, P.; Farha, O.K. Design Rules of Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks with High Chemical and Thermal Stabilities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 14, 10663–10687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lu, J.; Cao, R. Porous Organic Molecular Frameworks with Extrinsic Porosity: A Platform for Carbon Storage and Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9474–9480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hisaki, I.; Nakagawa, S.; Ikenaka, N.; Imamura, Y.; Katouda, M.; Tashiro, M.; Tsuchida, H.; Ogoshi, T.; Sato, H.; Tohnai, N.; et al. A Series of Layered Assemblies of Hydrogen-Bonded, Hexagonal Networks of C3-Symmetric pi-Conjugated Molecules: A Potential Motif of Porous Organic Materials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6617–6628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suzuki, Y.; Tohnai, N.; Saeki, A.; Hisaki, I. Hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks of twisted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 13369–13372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, R.B.; He, Y.B.; Li, P.; Wang, H.L.; Zhou, W.; Chen, B.L. Multifunctional porous hydrogen-bonded organic framework materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1362–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. di Nunzio, M.R.; Hisaki, I.; Douhal, A. HOFs under light: Relevance to photon-based science and applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C. 2021, 47, 100418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, X.; Chen, H.; Li, R.; Yang, M.; Guo, S.; Wang, L.; Liang, Q.; Li, Z. Cationic bipy induced the three dimensional supramolecules based on azoxybenzene tetracarboxylate: Structures and NIR luminescence property. Polyhedron 2019, 157, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, K.; Li, P.; Xin, J.H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Goswami, S.; Liu, X.; Kato, S.; Chen, H.; Zhang, X.; et al. Ultrastable Mesoporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework-Based Fiber Composites toward Mustard Gas Detoxification. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2020, 1, 100024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, F.; Liu, C.; Wu, M.; Pang, J.; Jiang, F.; Yuan, D.; Hong, M. An Ultrastable and Easily Regenerated Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Molecular Framework with Permanent Porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 2101–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yin, Q.; Zhao, P.; Sa, R.J.; Chen, G.C.; Lu, J.; Liu, T.F.; Cao, R. An Ultra-Robust and Crystalline Redeemable Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework for Synergistic Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 7691–7696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, B.; Lv, X.L.; Lv, J.; Ma, L.; Lin, R.B.; Cui, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S.; Chen, B. A novel mesoporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework with high porosity and stability. Chem. Commun. 2019, 56, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mastalerz, M.; Oppel, I.M. Rational Construction of an Extrinsic Porous Molecular Crystal with an Extraordinary High Specific Surface Area. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5252–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, Z.-B.; Xiao, Z.-Z.; Hao, M.; Yuan, D.-Q.; Liu, L.; Wei, N.; Yao, H.-M.; Zhou, M. Functional Hydrogen-Bonded Supramolecular Framework for K+ Ion Sensing. Cryst. Growth Des. 2015, 15, 531–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, P.; He, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Weng, L.; Wang, H.; Krishna, R.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; O’Keeffe, M.; Han, Y.; et al. A rod-packing microporous hydrogen-bonded organic framework for highly selective separation of C2H2/CO2 at room temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 574–577. [Google Scholar]
  19. He, X.-T.; Luo, Y.-H.; Hong, D.-L.; Chen, F.-H.; Zheng, Z.-Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.-Y.; Chen, C.; Sun, B.-W. Atomically Thin Nanoribbons by Exfoliation of Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Drug Delivery. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 2437–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qin, L.; Liang, F.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.; Guan, S.; Wu, M.; Xie, S.; Luo, M.; Ma, D. A 2D Porous Zinc-Organic Framework Platform for Loading of 5-Fluorouracil. Inorganics 2022, 10, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, J.; Cai, Y.; Qian, X.; Liu, P.; Wu, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, D.X.; Li, L.; Lin, R.B.; Chen, B. A Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework for the Efficient Capture and Purification of Propylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 20400–20406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Lin, R.B.; Ye, Y.; Yao, Z.; Yang, L.; Xiang, F.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Xiang, S.; et al. Ethylene/ethane separation in a stable hydrogen-bonded organic framework through a gating mechanism. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Qin, L.; Li, Y.; Liang, F.; Li, L.; Lan, Y.; Li, Z.; Lu, X.; Yang, M.; Ma, D. A microporous 2D cobalt-based MOF with pyridyl sites and open metal sites for selective adsorption of CO2. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 341, 112098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, H.-Q.; He, X.-H.; Zeng, Y.-N.; Qiu, W.-H.; Chen, J.; Cao, G.-J.; Lin, R.-G.; Lin, Z.-J.; Chen, B. Boosting the photoreduction activity of Cr(VI) in metal–organic frameworks by photosensitiser incorporation and framework ionization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 17219–17228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khan, U.; Nairan, A.; Gao, J.; Zhang, Q. Current Progress in 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks for Electrocatalysis. Small Structures 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, B.; He, R.; Xie, L.H.; Lin, Z.J.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Schanze, K.S.; Zhang, J.; et al. Microporous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Framework for Highly Efficient Turn-Up Fluorescent Sensing of Aniline. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12478–12485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hisaki, I.; Suzuki, Y.; Gomez, E.; Ji, Q.; Tohnai, N.; Nakamura, T.; Douhal, A. Acid Responsive Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2111–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Karmakar, A.; Illathvalappil, R.; Anothumakkool, B.; Sen, A.; Samanta, P.; Desai, A.V.; Kurungot, S.; Ghosh, S.K. Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks (HOFs): A New Class of Porous Crystalline Proton-Conducting Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 10667–10671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, X.-M.; Wang, Y.; Mu, Y.; Gao, J.; Zeng, L. Oriented construction of efficient intrinsic proton transport pathways in MOF-808. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 18592–18597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, L.; Zou, J.; Han, Y.; Liao, Z.; Lu, P.; Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A.; Liu, J.; Peng, Y. Recent advances in Al(iii)/In(iii)-based MOFs for the detection of pollutants. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 19577–19592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, X.; Li, D.; Li, Y.; Sakiyama, H.; Muddassir, M.; Pan, Y.; Srivastava, D.; Kumar, A. A 3,8-connected Cd(ii)-based metal-organic framework as an appropriate luminescent sensor for the antibiotic sulfasalazine. CrystEngComm 2022, 24, 7157–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Feng, X.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, N.; Wang, L.; Li, Z. Multi-functional lanthanide-CPs based on tricarboxylphenyl terpyridyl ligand as ratiometric luminescent thermometer and highly sensitive ion sensor with turn on/off effect. Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 4741–4750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Welch, N.G.; Scoble, J.A.; Easton, C.D.; Williams, C.C.; Bradford, B.J.; Mamedova, L.K.; Pigram, P.J.; Muir, B.W. High-Throughput Production of Chromium(III) Complexes for Antibody Immobilization. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 10102–10110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pradas del Real, A.E.; Perez-Sanz, A.; Lobo, M.C.; McNear, D.H., Jr. The chromium detoxification pathway in the multimetal accumulator Silene vulgaris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 11479–11486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vaidyanathan, V.G.; Weyhermuller, T.; Nair, B.U.; Subramanian, J. DNA damage induced by a chromium(III) Schiff base complex is reversible under physiological condition. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2005, 99, 2248–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, C.; Wu, G.; Wang, Z.; Ren, W.; Zhang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Li, T.; Wu, A. Selective colorimetric detection of Cr(iii) and Cr(vi) using gallic acid capped gold nanoparticles. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 8347–8354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, M.; Tan, H.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, L.; Jing, X.; Sun, Z. Fast response and high sensitivity europium metal organic framework fluorescent probe with chelating terpyridine sites for Fe3+. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1078–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhou, X.H.; Li, L.; Li, H.H.; Li, A.; Yang, T.; Huang, W. A flexible Eu(III)-based metal-organic framework: Turn-off luminescent sensor for the detection of Fe(III) and picric acid. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 12403–12409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weng, J.; Xue, J.; Wang, J.; Ye, J.; Cui, H.; Sheu, F.; Zhang, Q. Gold-Cluster Sensors Formed Electrochemically at Boron-Doped-Diamond Electrodes: Detection of Dopamine in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid and Thiols. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Barras, A.; Lyskawa, J.; Szunerits, S.; Woisel, P.; Boukherroub, R. Direct functionalization of nanodiamond particles using dopamine derivatives. Langmuir 2011, 27, 12451–12457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liggett, S.B. Pharmacogenetics of beta-1- and beta-2-adrenergic receptors. Pharmacology 2000, 61, 167–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bock, M.G.; Patane, M.A. Chapter 20. Toward the development of α 1a adrenergic receptor antagonists. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 2000, 35, 221–230. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, S.L.; Huang, Y.; Shi, M.; Liu, R.J.; Liu, Y.M. Chemiluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Detection for Microchip Electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2036–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Kim, Y.R.; Bong, S.; Kang, Y.J.; Yang, Y.; Mahajan, R.K.; Kim, J.S.; Kim, H. Electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using graphene modified electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 2366–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Li, N.; Guo, J.; Liu, B.; Yu, Y.; Cui, H.; Mao, L.; Lin, Y. Determination of monoamine neurotransmitters and their metabolites in a mouse brain microdialysate by coupling high-performance liquid chromatography with gold nanoparticle-initiated chemiluminescence. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 645, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, A.J.; Feng, J.J.; Dong, W.J.; Lu, Y.H.; Li, Z.H.; Riekkola, M.L. Spermine-graft-dextran non-covalent copolymer as coating material in separation of basic proteins and neurotransmitters by capillary electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 5130–5136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, J.; Park, J.; Van Wyk, A.; Rumbles, G.; Deria, P. Excited-State Electronic Properties in Zr-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks as a Function of a Topological Network. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10488–10496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Deria, P.; Yu, J.; Smith, T.; Balaraman, R.P. Ground-State versus Excited-State Interchromophoric Interaction: Topology Dependent Excimer Contribution in Metal-Organic Framework Photophysics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5973–5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liao, W.M.; Zhang, J.H.; Yin, S.Y.; Lin, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.P.; Wu, K.; Wang, Z.; Fan, Y.N.; et al. Tailoring exciton and excimer emission in an exfoliated ultrathin 2D metal-organic framework. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gutierrez, M.; Sanchez, F.; Douhal, A. Spectral and dynamical properties of a Zr-based MOF. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 5112–5120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gutierrez, M.; Sanchez, F.; Douhal, A. Competitive Excimer Formation and Energy Transfer in Zr-Based Heterolinker Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chemistry 2016, 22, 13072–13082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xu, H.; Dong, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ren, W.; Zhao, T.; Wang, S.; Gao, J. An -OH group functionalized MOF for ratiometric Fe3+ sensing. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 258, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, X.-Y.; Zhao, F.; Liu, J.-J.; Liu, Z.-L.; Wang, Y.-Q. An ultrastable zinc(ii)–organic framework as a recyclable multi-responsive luminescent sensor for Cr(iii), Cr(vi) and 4-nitrophenol in the aqueous phase with high selectivity and sensitivity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20035–20043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ko, M.; Mendecki, L.; Eagleton, A.M.; Durbin, C.G.; Stolz, R.M.; Meng, Z.; Mirica, K.A. Employing Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks for Voltammetric Detection of Neurochemicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11717–11733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Molecules 27 08750 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) HOF-TCBP framework linked by organic building blocks H4TCBP through hydrogen bonding; (b) the PXRD patterns of experimentally synthesized HOF-TCBP (red curve) and simulated data (black curve); (c,d) the SEM images of HOF-TCBP.
Figure 1. (a) HOF-TCBP framework linked by organic building blocks H4TCBP through hydrogen bonding; (b) the PXRD patterns of experimentally synthesized HOF-TCBP (red curve) and simulated data (black curve); (c,d) the SEM images of HOF-TCBP.
Molecules 27 08750 g001
Molecules 27 08750 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Excitation (short point line) and emission spectra (solid line) of organic building molecules H4TCBP, HOF-TCBP powder and HOF-TCBP ethanol solution; (b) fluorescence spectra of HOF-TCBP ethanol solutions at different concentrations.
Figure 2. (a) Excitation (short point line) and emission spectra (solid line) of organic building molecules H4TCBP, HOF-TCBP powder and HOF-TCBP ethanol solution; (b) fluorescence spectra of HOF-TCBP ethanol solutions at different concentrations.
Molecules 27 08750 g002
Molecules 27 08750 g003 550
Figure 3. (a,c) The PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different Cr3+ and Fe3+ ion concentrations added (excitation wavelength: 304 nm, monitoring wavelength: 359 nm); (b,d) S–V plots of Cr3+ and Fe3+; inset: the above figures are the linear fitting curves at low concentrations, respectively.
Figure 3. (a,c) The PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different Cr3+ and Fe3+ ion concentrations added (excitation wavelength: 304 nm, monitoring wavelength: 359 nm); (b,d) S–V plots of Cr3+ and Fe3+; inset: the above figures are the linear fitting curves at low concentrations, respectively.
Molecules 27 08750 g003
Molecules 27 08750 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence spectra of HOF-TCBP after adding different concentrations of Cr2O72−; inset: the above picture shows powder HOF-TCBP without Cr2O72− and with 10−3 M Cr2O72−; (b) the luminescence intensity of Cr2O72− and other interfering substances at 359 nm at the same concentration (1.0 × 10−3 M).
Figure 4. (a) Fluorescence spectra of HOF-TCBP after adding different concentrations of Cr2O72−; inset: the above picture shows powder HOF-TCBP without Cr2O72− and with 10−3 M Cr2O72−; (b) the luminescence intensity of Cr2O72− and other interfering substances at 359 nm at the same concentration (1.0 × 10−3 M).
Molecules 27 08750 g004
Molecules 27 08750 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) The PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 6 buffer solution (excitation wavelength: 330 nm, monitoring wavelength: 397 nm); (b) the emission intensity of HOF-TCBP of 1.0 × 10−2 M different organic compounds at pH = 6 buffer solution at 397 nm.
Figure 5. (a) The PL spectra of HOF-TCBP with different DA contents in pH = 6 buffer solution (excitation wavelength: 330 nm, monitoring wavelength: 397 nm); (b) the emission intensity of HOF-TCBP of 1.0 × 10−2 M different organic compounds at pH = 6 buffer solution at 397 nm.
Molecules 27 08750 g005
Table
Table 1. Detection of DA in fetal bovine serum.
Table 1. Detection of DA in fetal bovine serum.
No.Spiked (µM)Measured (µM)Recovery (%)R.S.D. (n = 3, %)
15051.4102.82.62
2100104.9104.92.26
3150151.7101.11.54
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, F.; Xu, H.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shen, P.; Zhang, W.; Xie, H.; Bai, G.; Xu, S.; Gao, J. Multi-Responsive Sensor Based on Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Ions and Dopamine Molecules. Molecules 2022, 27, 8750. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248750

AMA Style

Chen F, Xu H, Cai Y, Zhang W, Shen P, Zhang W, Xie H, Bai G, Xu S, Gao J. Multi-Responsive Sensor Based on Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Ions and Dopamine Molecules. Molecules. 2022; 27(24):8750. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248750

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Faqiang, Hui Xu, Youlie Cai, Wei Zhang, Penglei Shen, Wenhua Zhang, Hangqing Xie, Gongxun Bai, Shiqing Xu, and Junkuo Gao. 2022. "Multi-Responsive Sensor Based on Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Ions and Dopamine Molecules" Molecules 27, no. 24: 8750. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248750

APA Style

Chen, F., Xu, H., Cai, Y., Zhang, W., Shen, P., Zhang, W., Xie, H., Bai, G., Xu, S., & Gao, J. (2022). Multi-Responsive Sensor Based on Porous Hydrogen-Bonded Organic Frameworks for Selective Sensing of Ions and Dopamine Molecules. Molecules, 27(24), 8750. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27248750

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop