Next Article in Journal
A Multimethodological Characterization of Cannabis sativa L. Inflorescences from Seven Dioecious Cultivars Grown in Italy: The Effect of Different Harvesting Stages
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Study on the Photo-Oxidation and Photoreduction of an Azetidine Derivative as a Model of DNA Repair
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 26
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules26102910
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sambucus Nigra Extracts–Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds

by
Anna Przybylska-Balcerek
1,
Tomasz Szablewski
2,
Lidia Szwajkowska-Michałek
1,*,
Dariusz Świerk
3,
Renata Cegielska-Radziejewska
2,
Zbigniew Krejpcio
4,
Elżbieta Suchowilska
5,
Łukasz Tomczyk
2 and
Kinga Stuper-Szablewska
1
1
Department of Chemistry, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
2
Department of Menegment of Food Quality and Safety, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Landscape Architecture, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
4
Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetic, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznan, Poland
5
Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2021, 26(10), 2910; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102910
Submission received: 19 April 2021 / Revised: 5 May 2021 / Accepted: 7 May 2021 / Published: 14 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Food Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the health-promoting properties of elderberry fruits, which result from their rich chemical composition, this raw material is widely used in herbal medicine and the food industry. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the antibacterial activity of the elderberry fruit extracts. The research showed that the content of phenolic acids and flavonoids in the extracts determined their antibacterial activity. The research showed that the content of phenolic acids and flavonoids in the extracts determined their antibacterial activity. The following phenolic acids were predominant: chlorogenic acid, sinapic acid, and t-cinnamic acid. Their average content was, respectively, 139.09, 72.84, 51.29 mg/g extract. Rutin and quercetin (their average content was 1105.39 and 306.6 mg/g extract, respectively) were the dominant flavonoids. The research showed that the elderberry polyphenol extracts exhibited activity against selected strains of bacteria within the concentration range of 0.5–0.05%. The following bacteria were the most sensitive to the extracts: Micrococcus luteus, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas fragii, and Escherichia coli. Of the compounds under analysis, apigenin, kaempferol and ferulic, protocatechuic, and p-coumarin acids had the greatest influence on the high antibacterial activity of elderberry extracts. The results of the microbiological and chemical analyses of the composition of the extracts were analyzed statistically to indicate the bioactive compounds of the greatest antimicrobial significance.

1. Introduction

Elderberry is a plant species of the Adoxaceae family. Formerly it was also included in the Sambucaceae and Caprifoliaceae families [1,2]. Currently there are about 20 intraspecific taxa of elderberry around the world. The varieties growing in forests and parks are predominant, but there are also cultivars grown for industrial purposes [3,4,5,6,7].
Elderberry fruits (Sambuci fructus) are spherical drupes, occurring in the form of corymbs with several dozen pieces inside. Their color depends on the stage of ripeness. In the beginning the fruit is green, but when it is fully ripe, it is black and violet [7,8,9]. Due to the health-promoting properties of elderberry fruits, which result from their rich chemical composition, this raw material is widely used in herbal medicine and the food industry.
The chemical composition of elderberry fruits depends on various factors, including the cultivar, environmental conditions (light, temperature, amount, and frequency of rainfall, fertilization, cultivation methods), the processing method and storage conditions. Ripe elderberry fruits contain carbohydrates, including dietary fiber, mainly hemicelluloses and polygalacturonic acid, pectins, and simple sugars [10,11]. Elderberries contain small amounts (2.7–2.9%) of protein, including seven exogenous amino acids [12,13]. They are also rich in fatty acids, mainly linoleic acid, linolenic acid, and oleic acid [11,14]. Elderberry fruits are a source of tannins and organic acids, including malic, acetic, valeric, tartaric, shikimic, and benzoic acids [15,16]. Apart from that, elderberry fruits contain 0.01% of essential oil, which is composed of over 30 different compounds, including phenyl aldehydes (3–25.8% of the oil composition) and furfural (18%) [17,18]. Elderberry fruits are also a source of minerals [19,20,21,22], considerably diversified amounts of vitamin C: 6–25 mg/100 g [23], 18–36 mg/100 g [21], 18–26 mg/100 g [24], 6–44 mg/100 g [19,20], and even 132.1 mg/100 g [17], as well as a wide range of B vitamins: B2–65 mg/100 g; B7–17 mg/100 g, B9–1.8 mg/100 g [21,24] and vitamin A (600 IU/100 g) [21].
The antioxidative properties of elderberries are mostly determined by anthocyanins, which are a large group of bioactive compounds (cyanidin-3-glucoside: 65.7% of all anthocyanins) [25,26], as well as flavonoids, flavonols, and phenolic acids.
According to reference publications, there are significant differences between the profile of bioactive compounds in the fruits of cultivated and wild plants [27]. Currently Poland is a country with the best-documented tradition of picking wild edible plants [28,29]. The progressive nutritional trends oriented to traditional functional food have sparked intensified research on wild edible plants [30,31]. The health-promoting and healing properties of elderberry products and preparations were the basis of this study. So far, the antimicrobial activity of ethanol-aqueous extracts from freeze-dried elderberry concentrates has been investigated on 13 nosocomial pathogens, including Staphylococcus aurens, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella poona, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [32]. However, currently the most important direction of research is the compounds contained in elderberry fruit products, which exhibit antiviral activity, especially against group A (KAN-1 HSNI) and B viruses (B/Mass) [33,34].
Literature data reported that extracts of black elder flowers as well fruits inhibited Gram-positive (S. aureus, B. cereus) and Gram-negative bacteria (S. poona, P. aeruginosa). Flavonons, flavonols dihydroflavonols presentin fruts, and flowers of black elder may be responsible for their antimicrobial properties. Furthermore, they can contain lecithin, peptides, and oligosaccharides which are inhibitors of transcription and metabolism of the bacterial cells [32].
This study was conducted on extracts of bioactive compounds from freeze-dried elderberry fruits growing wild in Poland. The extracts were obtained with an original method described in detail in the Materials and Methods section.
The aim of this study was to assess the antimicrobial activity of aqueous solutions of wild elderberry extracts obtained by double hydrolysis. The results of the microbiological and chemical analyses of the composition of the extracts were analyzed statistically to indicate the bioactive compounds of the greatest antimicrobial significance. Interdisciplinary research was conducted to find interrelations between the factors under analysis and to better understand the antimicrobial activity of elderberry extracts.

2. Results and Discussion

The samples of elderberries collected from 36 locations in Poland were subjected to the extraction process described in the Materials and Methods section. The extract preparation method was optimized to match the specificity and chemical composition of the material. The main focus of the investigations was bioactive compounds, mainly antioxidants. The average values of the results are shown below.
The first stage of the investigations involved analysis of the antioxidative activity measured by means of ABTS+ (Table 1). A high value of the antioxidative activity indicated the presence of antioxidative compounds. The next stage of investigations involved measurement of the total free phenolic acids content and total flavonoids content (TFC). The elderberry extracts had a high amount of these compounds. By comparison, according to reference publications, the content of polyphenols per 100 g of elderberry fruits is diversified, e.g., 25.87–38.87 mg/g DM [23], 827 mg [35], 1336 mg [36], or 513.6 mg [37].
The next stage of the investigations involved analysis of the content of 15 selected phenolic acids (Table 2) and 8 flavonoids (Table 2) in the extracts (Figure 1). The following phenolic acids were predominant: chlorogenic acid, sinapic acid, and t-cinnamic acid. Rutin and quercetin were the dominant flavonoids. However, it is noteworthy that the antimicrobial activity of these extracts results from the entire composition of bioactive compounds rather than from individual compounds, as has been presented in scientific publications so far. According to the reference publications, polyphenols contained total flavonoids at a concentration of 186 mg/100 g in, where quercetin (about 73.4 mg/100 g) [14], isoquercitin, rutoside, and hyperoside were the dominant compounds [11,38]. Another two groups of bioactive compounds described in the reference publications were total flavonols (38.26–142.3 mg/100 g) [39,40] and total phenolic acids (20.00 mg/100 g) [37]. Like in our research, chlorogenic acid was also the dominant phenolic acid in other studies (10–32 mg/100 g) [37,38,41].
Organic acids were the next group of compounds analyzed in our research. Table 3 lists the content of organic acids and basic sugars: glucose and fructose. These parameters indicate the degree of fruit ripeness and determine the organoleptic characteristics of fruit products. The relation between acids and sugars should be inversely proportional. On the one hand, a higher sugar content makes fruits and fruit products more desirable. On the other hand, a high content of organic acids reduces the pH and stabilizes the bonds and structures of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and anthocyanins. In consequence, the antioxidative activity of the entire system of bioactive compounds increases. Citric acid was the dominant acid, which is characteristic of berries.
At the next stage the elderberry extracts were analyzed for the content of natural pigments determining the color of ripe fruits. The analysis revealed the presence of carotenoids, chlorophylls, and anthocyanins (Table 4). Anthocyanins were the compounds with the highest total mean content, i.e., 109 mg/g of the elderberry fruit extract. According to the data provided in the reference publications, the total anthocyanins content in 100 g of fresh elderberries was considerably diversified, i.e., 200–1000 mg [42], 465.1 mg [37], 272.87 mg [40], 863.89 mg [43], 1265 mg [20]. The differences in the content of anthocyanins may have been caused by differences between the varieties of elderberry fruit and the weather conditions during ripening [44]. The authors of other studies mostly identified: cyanidin-3-glycoside (65.7% of all anthocyanins), cyanidin-3-sambubioside (32.4%), and cyanidin-3-diglycoside (0.8% of all anthocyanins) [26,45]. According to the data provided in the reference publications, the content of anthocyanins in 100 g of fresh fruit amounted to 529–664 mg in the Haschberg cultivar, 877 and 1815 mg in the Sampo cultivar, and 846 and 1634 mg in the Samyl cultivar. The content of anthocyanins in elderberry products depended on the degree of processing and technological conditions, since anthocyanins are unstable compounds [11,44,46]. Elderberries usually contain 0.2–1% of anthocyanins and about 0.01% of essential oil, which contains about 50 compounds. For this reason, elderberries are used as a natural pigment and for the flavoring of food products [13,34,43]. Additionally, unripe fruits contain sambucin, and more precisely–sambunigrin. This is a highly poisonous cyanogenic glycoside (benzaldehyde cyanohydrin). Therefore, the consumption of raw elderberries may cause acute poisoning, weakness, and gastrointestinal ailments [21]. The results of toxicological studies led to the conclusion that the consumption of elderberries after thermal treatment is safe and does not cause any side effects [47,48,49,50].
The composition of extracts of phenolic compounds is an important determinant affecting various directions of their activity. This study focused on the antibacterial effect of the extracts.
Reference strains of the bacteria which are pathogenic mainly to humans and cause food spoilage were selected for microbiological tests (Table 5). Before some of these bacterial strains were not investigated thoroughly enough for their sensitivity to the activity of polyphenolic bioactive compounds.
The research showed that the elderberry polyphenol extracts exhibited activity against selected strains of bacteria within the concentration range of 0.5–0.05%. The following bacteria were the most sensitive to the extracts: M. luteus, P. mirabilis, P. fragii, and E. coli. This finding significantly broadened the current knowledge, because so far only selected tannins derived from hydroxycinnamic, gallic, and caffeic acids, as well as triterpenes (oleanic acid and α- and β-amarin) were considered antimicrobial substances [14,51]. The studies conducted so far showed that selected polyphenols and their esters inhibited the growth of bacteria of the following genera: Yersinia, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Proteus, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Micrococcus, Escherichia, and Pseudomonas. Gallic, vanillic, synaptic, and protocatechuic acids effectively inhibit the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, e.g., E. coli, Enterobacter cloacae DG-6, and Ps. acidovorans [52,53,54,55,56,57]. These acids are more effective against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacterial cells, because the cells of Gram-negative bacteria have an outer shell surrounding the cell wall, which makes it difficult for hydrophobic compounds to diffuse through the liposaccharide membrane into the cell. Caffeic, ferulic, and protocatechic acids are bioactive compounds which inhibit the growth of bacteria responsible for food poisoning, e.g., Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus cereus. Phenolic acid derivatives also exhibit the bactericidal effect against Y. enterocolitica rods. Among them o-coumaric acid compounds are more effective than m-coumaric acid derivatives, which could be associated with both the chemical structure of phenolic compounds and the resistance of these bacteria [57]. Martins et al. [58] observed that polyphenol extracts inhibited the development of Candida species [59,60,61]. Kędzia and Hołderna-Kędzia [62] used phenolic acids, i.e., p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, and ferulic acid in their research and observed that they inhibited the growth of St. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis, and Ps. aeruginosa bacteria. Salicylic acid exhibited a relatively stronger antibacterial effect (MIC 100–500 μg/mL). Gallic acid also exhibited a strong antibacterial effect (the MIC for S. aureus was 150 μg/mL). On the other hand, syringic, gentisic, and p-hydroxybenzoic acids had a very weak effect on S. aureus (MIC > 1000 μg/mL). The same authors also found that depsides (chlorogenic acid, rosmarinic acid, ellagic acid) exhibited weak antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis, and Ps. aeruginosa [62]. Efenberger-Szmechtyk et al. [63] also used aqueous extracts of phenolic acids to investigate their antimicrobial properties and observed that they effectively limited the growth of the following bacteria: E. faecalis, B. thermosphacta, E. coli, Ps. fluorescens, L. rhamnosus, P. mirabilis, and E. aerogenes [63]. Latest studies also confirmed the antibacterial activity of six phenolic acids and showed the antibacterial potential of extracts against Gram-positive bacteria (E. faecalis and L. monocytogenes) [64,65]. Camargo et al. [66] also noted that phenolic acid extracts inhibited the growth of Gram-positive bacteria (B. cereus, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, Gb. stearothermophilus) and Gram-negative bacteria (Ps. aeruginosa, Ps. fluorescens, S. enteritidis, S. typhimurium, E. coli) [66]. Other researchers studied the activity of flavonoid extracts against Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., E. coli and Ps. aeruginosa, and found that the level of their activity depended on their chemical structure [67]. Malterund et al. [68] studied the antibacterial properties of flavonoids and found that only naringenin exhibited antibacterial activity against E. coli, S. aureus, and E. faecalis. Iwagawa et al. [69] noted that some quercetin derivatives inhibited the growth of E. coli. Basile et al. (1999) [70] found that apigenin, vitexin, and saponarin acted selectively against some Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., P. vulgaris, P. mirabilis, Ps. aeruginosa, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and E. cloacae. The minimum inhibitory concentration of apigenin was determined in that study. The other flavonoids were not active against the strains tested. The same scientists conducted an identical study on Gram-positive bacteria, i.e., S aureus and E. faecalis, but the flavonoids they tested did not exhibit any lethal activity. Oksus et al. [71] determined the MIC of apigenin (54–219 µg/mL) against the P. vulgaris, Ps. aeruginosa, E. coli, and K. pneumoniae bacteria. Waage and Hedin [72] tested quercetin glycosides and noted that quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside exhibited the highest activity against Ps. maltophilia and E. cloacae. Liu et al. [73] observed that kaempferol glycosides were the most effective against Gram-positive bacteria. The MICs of the kaempferol and chloramphenicol glycosides against B. cereus were 16 µg/mL and 2 µg/mL, respectively [73]. The MICs of kaempferol and chloramphenicol glycosides against Gram-positive S. aureus bacteria were 32 μg/mL and 64 μg/mL, respectively [74]. Wang et al. [75] studied various methyl and acetyl derivatives of flavonoids and concluded that the presence of hydroxyl groups at the C-5 and C-7 positions was very important for the antimicrobial activity. The presence of an additional methoxy group at C7 or dihydroxy groups at C-3′ and C-4′ significantly reduced the antimicrobial activity [75]. Van Puyvelde et al. [76] noted the antibacterial activity of flavones, flavonols, flavanones, and isoflavones against P. vulgaris and S. aureus.
The canonical correlation analysis (CCA) showed a negative correlation between flavonoids (excluding luteolin and rutin), hydroxycinnamic acids (excluding caffeic acid), hydroxybenzoic acids (excluding chlorogenic and 4-hydroxybenzoic acids) and the presence of pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms (Figure 2). The compounds with the greatest potential to inhibit microbial growth were kempferol, apigenin, protocatechuic, and ferulic acids.
There was an inversely proportional relation between glucose and citric and fumaric acids as well as between anthocyanins and malic and shikimic acids.
The canonical variate analysis (CVA) enabled the creation of a CCA model. Progressive stepwise analysis was used to determine which variables determined the activity of the pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms to the greatest extent. All the variables were assessed and the ones that contributed most to the group discrimination based on the p and F values for the variable under analysis were included in the model. This process was repeated until the p value increased above 0.05 or the F value dropped below 2.00 for the variable under analysis.
The analysis determined homogeneous groups of elderberry extracts in terms of their content of compounds. There were three homogeneous groups in terms of the content of polyphenols and flavonoids: the first one was closely correlated with luteolin and vanilin–all the samples came from the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship (Group I), the second one was correlated with chlorogenic, 4-hydroxybenzoic, and benzoic acids–the samples collected from the Lublin Voivodeship (Group II), the third one was correlated with the content of catechin, ferulic acid, and naringin (Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, Łódź Voivodeship, and Greater Poland Voivodeship, but the sites were located in central Poland) (Group III). Table 6 and Table 7 list the statistical parameters for the detrended correspondence analysis. The list of Voivodeships of the analyzed samples is presented in Table 8.
The DCA revealed four homogeneous groups in terms of the antioxidative activity and the content of organic acids, pigments, and sugars in the elderberry extracts. As was the case with the previous model, groups I, II, and III were created. The fourth group was not related to the location, but it was similar in terms of the content of carotenoids, fructose, and fumaric and shikimic acids. In this case the location did not determine the distribution of compounds in the elderberries. Further research is necessary to identify factors influencing the degradation of bioactive compounds in elderberries.
In order to use elderberry extracts for health purposes, we should take into account the bioavailability of the active ingredients present in these extracts. Bioavailability can be defined as the amount or fraction of a compound that is released into the gastrointestinal tract and becomes available for absorption [77]. The research showed that the content of phenolic acids and flavonoids in the extracts determined their antibacterial activity. Scientific literature showed that phenolic acid can be absorbed in the stomach, small intestine, or both. [78]. The metabolization of flavonoids begins with hydrolysis of the glycosidic linkage, action that takes place in the intestine lumen or in enterocytes and then absorbed. These compounds, depending on their chemical structure, are hydrolyzed by endogenous human cytosolic β-glucosidase or by rhamnosidase, an enzyme produced by the intestinal microflora [79].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Research Material

The research was conducted on 500 g of wild elderberry fruits (Sambucus nigra L.) harvested in Poland in August and September 2019. The fruits were harvested in 36 places of their natural occurrence, which were marked with numbers in further part of this article. The fruits were harvested when they were fully ripe. After the harvest they were frozen and freeze-dried (temperature −53 °C, pressure 0.025 mbar). After drying the fruits were subjected to the extraction process.
The extracts were obtained with an innovative method of double hydrolysis (acidic and alkaline) and extraction of bioactive compounds, which were released from glycosidic bonds with diethyl ether. After evaporation the dry extracts were dissolved in deionized water and used in microbiological tests.
The extracts were tested for the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against 7 bacterial strains and analyzed chemically to determine the content of phenolic compounds, pigments and antioxidative properties in a test with the ABTS+ radical.

3.2. Extraction Procedure

The phenolic compounds in the samples were analyzed after alkaline and acid hydrolysis. 10 g of the dehydrated plant material was placed in a 750 cm3 round bottom flask. The flask was placed under a reflux condenser. First, an alkaline hydrolysis was performed, followed by an acid hydrolysis. Next, 50 mL of distilled water and 200 mL of 2 M aqueous sodium hydroxide solution were added to the test tubes for the alkaline hydrolysis. The sealed flasks were heated in a heating mantle at 95 °C for 30 min. After cooling (approx. 20 min), the samples were neutralized with 100 mL of a 6 M aqueous hydrochloric acid solution (pH = 2). The samples were then cooled in ice water. Flavonoids were extracted from the inorganic (aqueous) phase with diethyl ether (2 × 100 mL). The ether extracts formed were continuously transferred to 250 cm 3 round bottom distillation flasks and evaporated on a rotary evaporator. Then acid hydrolysis was performed. For this, the aqueous phase was supplemented with 150 mL of 6 M aqueous hydrochloric acid solution and heated again at 95 °C for 30 min. After cooling with ice water, the samples were extracted with diethyl ether (2 × 100 mL). The produced ether extracts were continuously transferred to 250 cm3 round bottom distillation flasks and evaporated on a rotary evaporator. The extract was quantitatively transferred from the distillation flasks to 8 cm3 vials, washing the flasks 2 × 4 cm3 with diethyl ether. Then the extracts were dried under a stream of nitrogen at room temperature. The dry extracts were weighed and stored at −80 °C until further analysis (Table 8). Prior to subsequent analysis steps, the extracts were thawed under refrigeration for 12 h and then digested with a selected amount of MiliQ-grade distilled water to obtain the selected concentration. Elderberry extracts were digested to a volume of 25 cm3 in a volumetric flask.

Chromatographic Analysis

The analysis was performed using an Acquity H class UPLC system equipped with a Waters Acquity PDA detector (Milford, MA, USA). The chromatographic separation was performed on an Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 column (Watersy, Dublin, Ireland) (100 mm × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.7 µm) (Watersy, Dublin, Ireland). The elution was carried out in a gradient using the following mobile phase composition: A: acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid, B: 1% aqueous formic acid mixture (pH = 2). The concentrations of phenolic compounds were determined with the use of an internal standard at wavelengths λ = 320 nm and 280 nm and finally given in mg/1 g of extract. Compounds were identified by comparing the retention time of the analyzed peak with the standard retention time and by adding a specific amount of standard to the analyzed samples and repeating the analysis. The detection level was 1 µg/g.

3.3. Total Phenolic Content (TPC)

The total phenolic content was measured with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [80,81], 2 mL of the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent was added to 1 mL of the aqueous extract. After 3 min the reaction environment was alkalised by adding 10 mL of a 10% sodium carbonate solution. After 30 min the solutions were filled up to 25 mL and their absorbance was measured at a wavelength of λ = 765 nm, using a Hitachi U-2900 spectrophotometer (Schaumburg, IL, USA). The results were calculated as the mean of triplicates, in mg phenolic compounds per gram of raw material expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE).

3.4. Total Chlorophyll Content

The plant material was thoroughly ground in a mortar containing 3 mL of ethanol, a pinch of sand and a pinch of CaCO3. The solution was quantified into labelled centrifuge tubes. The mortar and pestle were rinsed with another 2 mL of alcohol, which was poured into the same centrifuge tubes. The tubes with the chlorophyll alcohol solution were capped and kept in a dark place until centrifugation. The samples were centrifuged at 9000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. Next, the supernatant was quantitatively transferred into new labelled centrifuge tubes. Then, 1.9 mL of ethyl alcohol and 0.5 mL of the sample under analysis were poured into spectrophotometer cuvettes. The contents were mixed, and the chlorophyll content was determined with a UV/VIS Excellence 6850 spectrophotometer at wavelengths of: 645 nm, 649 nm, 654 nm, and 665 nm. The apparatus was zeroed at the specified wavelength on 2 mL of ethanol. All the measurements were triplicated. The formula below was used to calculate the content of chlorophyll a and b:
Chlorophyll (a + b) = [(25.1 × A654) × (V: (1000 × W))] × 4 [mg g−1 fresh weight]
where:
A 645-665—absorbance measured at a wavelength of 649–665 nm,
V—total volume of the extract (mL),
W—weight of the sample (g) [82].

3.5. Total Anthocyanin Content (TAC)

The total anthocyanin content was measured with the spectrophotometric method described by Giusti and Wrolstad [80]. The results of the measurements were expressed as cyanidin-3-glucoside (C3G). 2 g of the product was collected and homogenized for 3 min (20,000 rpm) with 100 cm3 of a mixture of methanol and 1.5-molar hydrochloric acid (85:15). The homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 4000 rpm. A clear liquid was collected for analysis. The other products were diluted with buffers so as to make a spectrophotometric measurement within an absorbance range of 0.3–0.8. Depending on the sample, the dilution factor (DF) ranged from 12.5 to 20. All the measurements were triplicated with the UV VIS Excellence 6850 spectrophotometer [83,84,85].

3.6. Total Carotenoid Content

Determination of the total carotenoids and β-carotene content was carried out in accordance with the Polish standard [86].

3.7. Sugar Content

The content of glucose and fructose was measured in diluted and purified samples by means of HPLC with refractometric detection, using prepared standard curves. The chromatographic analysis was conducted under the following conditions: Shimadzu (Milton Keynes, England) apparatus, LC-20AD pump, RID—10A detector, Rezex RCM-Monosaccharide Ca2+ 300 × 7.8 mm column, column temperature 80 °C, mobile phase: deionized water, flow 0.8 cm3/min.

3.8. MIC Measurement

The minimum concentrations of the elderberry fruit extracts inhibiting (MIC) the growth of Escherichia coli (PCM 2793), Salmonella enteritidis (PCM 2548), Proteus mirabilis (PCM 1361), Pseudomonas fluorescens (PCM 2123), Pseudomonas fragii (PCM 1856), Listeria innocua (DSM 20649), and Micrococcus luteus (PCM 525) were measured with a Bioscreen C automated growth reader (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd.,TURKU, Finland). Bacterial inoculants and a series of diluted hydrated extracts were placed on a plate and incubated for 72 h under adequate conditions for individual groups of bacteria. The apparatus measured the optical density (OD) in each cuvette. The first concentration without turbidity was considered the MIC value, i.e., the minimum concentration at which the microorganisms used in the study were inactivated during 72-h incubation.

3.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses and models were based on discriminant analysis. The analyses showed which of the variables – pigments, sugars, organic acids, or polyphenols, may affect the activity of pathogenic and food-spoilage microorganisms. The model was constructed using canonical variate analysis (CVA)—the canonical variation of Fisher’s linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [87]. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was used as an indirect method to prepare a diagram, ordering the samples under analysis. The borderline significance level was determined with the Monte Carlo permutation test (number of permutations: 9.999). The Canoco for Windows package and the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet was the software (Canoco 5) (accessed 3 October 2019) used for all comparisons, calculations, and graphic elements. The following tools from Canoco for Windows were used: Canoco for Windows 4.5, CanoDraw for Windows, and WcanoIMP.

4. Conclusions

The research showed that the content of phenolic acids and flavonoids in the extracts determined their antibacterial activity. Of the compounds under analysis, apigenin, kaempferol and ferulic, protocatechuic, and p-coumarin acids had the greatest influence on the high antibacterial activity of elderberry extracts. The statistical analyses did not show any significant influence of the location on the profile of bioactive compounds in the extracts. The extraction method presented in the study made it possible to obtain preparations containing free compounds with antioxidative and antibacterial properties. This method can facilitate the standardization of wild elderberry preparations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S.-S. and Z.K.; methodology, T.S.; software, E.S.; validation, K.S.-S., E.S. and T.S.; formal analysis, R.C.-R.; investigation, T.S.; Ł.T.; resources, D.Ś.; data curation, D.Ś.; writing—original draft preparation, A.P.-B. and K.S.-S.; writing—review and editing, L.S.-M.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication was financed from the project under sub-measure 2.3.2. Innovation Vouchers for MŚP of the Intelligent Development Operational Program, 2014-2020 Agreement No: POIR.02.03.02-22-22-0009/20-00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.

References

  1. Charlebois, D.; Byers, P.L.; Finn, C.E.; Thomas, A.L. Elderberry: Botany, horticulture, potential. In Horticultural Reviews; Janick, J., Ed.; Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 37, pp. 213–280. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fazio, A.; Plastina, P.; Meijerink, J.; Witkamp, R.F.; Gabriele, B. Comparative analyses of seeds of wild fruits of Rubus and Sambucus species from southern Italy: Fatty acid composition of the oil, total phenolic content, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the methanolic extracts. Food Chem. 2013, 140, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaack, K.; Austed, T. Interaction of vitamin C and flavonoids in elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) during juice processing. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 1998, 52, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Christensen, L.P.; Kaack, K.; Fretté, X.C. Selection of elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) genotypes best suited for the preparation of elderflower extracts rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Salvador, Â.C.; Silvestre, A.J.; Rocha, S.M. Unveiling elderflowers (Sambucus nigra L.) volatile terpenic and norisoprenoids profile: Effects of different postharvest conditions. Food Chem. 2017, 229, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Schmitzer, V.; Veberic, R.; Slatnar, A.; Stampar, F. Elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) wine: A product rich in health promoting compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10143–10146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nurzyńska-Wierdak, R. Właściwości lecznicze i wykorzystanie w fizjoterapii niektórych gatunków roślin drzewiastych. Krzewy półkuli północnej. Ann. UMCS s EEE Hortic. 2016, 26, 27–46. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  8. Wierzbicki, A. Dziki bez czarny—Pozyskiwanie surowca i jego zastosowanie. Wiad. Zielar. 2002, 4, 8–10. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  9. Dyduch, J. Bez czarny—Charakterystyka biologiczna, wykorzystanie w ziołolecznictwie, kosmetyce i gospodarstwach domowych. Cz. I. Epistem. 2014, 25, 21–27. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  10. Ho, G.T.; Kase, E.T.; Wangensteen, H.; Barsett, H. Phenolic Elderberry Extracts, Anthocyanins, Procyanidins, and Metabolites Influence Glucose and Fatty Acid Uptake in Human Skeletal Muscle Cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 2677–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Veberic, R.; Jakopic, J.; Stampar, F.; Schmitzer, V. European elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) rich in sugars, organic acids, anthocyanins and selected polyphenols. Food Chem. 2009, 114, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akbulut, M.; Ercisli, S.; Tosun, M. Physico-chemical characteristics of some wild grown European elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.) genotypes. Pharmacogn. Mag. 2009, 5, 320–323. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kislichenko, V.S.; Vel’ma, V.V. Amino-acid composition of flowers, leaves and extract of Sambucus nigra flowers. Chem. Nat. Comp. 2006, 42, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gleńsk, M.; Gleńsk, M.; Gliński, J.A.; Włodarczyk, M. Determination of ursolic and oleanolic acid in Sambuci fructus. Chem. Biodivers. 2014, 11, 1939–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dulf, F.V.; Oroian, I.; Vodnar, D.C.; Socaciu, C.; Pintea, A. Lipid classes and fatty acid regiodistribution in triacylglycerols of seed oils of two Sambucus species (S. nigra L.; And, S. ebulus L.). Molecules 2013, 18, 11768–11782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Viapiana, A.; Wesolowski, M. The Phenolic Contents and Antioxidant Activities of Infusions of Sambucus nigra L. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017, 72, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gleńsk, M.; Czapińska, E.; Woźniak, M.; Ceremuga, I.; Włodarczyk, M.; Terlecki, P.; Ziółkowski, P.; Seweryn, E. Triterpenoid acids as important antiproliferative constituents of European elderberry fruits. Nutr. Cancer 2017, 69, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Salvador ÂCRocha, S.M.; Silvestre, A.J.D. Lipophilic phytochemicals from elderberries (Sambucus nigra L.): Influence of ripening, cultivar and season. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 71, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kołodziej, B.; Maksymiec, N.; Drożdzal, K.; Antonkiewicz, J. Effect of traffic pollution on chemical composition of raw elderberry (Sambucus nigra L.). J. Elementol. 2012, 17, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nawirska-Olszańska, A. Roślina nie bez potencjału. Czarny bez—Chwast, a może jednak roślina lecznicza? Kierunek Spoż 2016, 2, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  21. Liszka, K.D.; Najgebauer-Lejko, A.; Tabaszewska, M. Owoce czarnego bzu (Sambucus nigra L.)—Charakterystyka i możliwości wykorzystania w przemyśle spożywczym. [w:] Innowacyjne rozwiązania w technologii żywności i żywieniu człowieka. Tarko T, Drożdż I, Najgebauer-Lejko D, Duda Chodak A (red). PTTŻ Kraków 2016, 1, 102–109. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  22. Czech, A.; Rusinek, E.; Merska, M. Zawartość wybranych biopierwiastków w owocach i sokach owoców jagodowych. Probl. Hig. Epidemiol. 2011, 92, 836–839. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  23. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Staniek, H.; Kidoń, M.; Łysiak, G.P. The content of selected minerals, bioactive compounds, and the antioxidant properties of the flowers and fruit of selected cultivars and wildly growing plants of Sambucus nigra L. Molecules 2020, 25, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Assessment Report on Sambucus nigra L., Fructus; EMA/HMPC/44208/2012; EMA: London, UK, 2013.
  25. Brønnum–Hansen, K.; Hansen, S.H. High performance liquid chromatographic separation of anthocyanins of Sambucus nigra L. J. Chromatogr. 1983, 262, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, X.; Gu, L.; Prior, R.L.; McKay, S. Characterization of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in some cultivars of Ribes, Aronia, and Sambucus and their antioxidant capacity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 52, 7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Diviš, P.; Pořízka, J.; Vespalcová, M.; Matějíček, A.; Kaplan, J. Elemental composition of fruits from different Black elder (Sambucus nigra L.) culti-vars grown in the Czech Republic. J. Elem. 2015, 20, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Turner, N.J.; Łuczaj, Ł.J.; Migliorini, P.; Pieroni, A.; Dreon, A.L.; Sacchetti, L.E. Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Criti. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011, 30, 198–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Svanberg, I.; Łuczaj, Ł.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M.; Pieroni, A. History and current trends of ethnobiological research in Europe. In Ethnobiology; Anderson, E.N., Adams, K., Pearsall, D., Hunn, E., Turner, N., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 189–212. [Google Scholar]
  30. Pawera, L.; Khomsan, A.; Zuhud, E.A.M.; Hunter, D.; Ickowitz, A.; Polesny, Z. Wild food plants and trends in their use: From knowledge and perceptions to drivers of change in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Foods 2011, 9, 1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Łuczaj, Ł.; Pieroni, A.; Tardío, J.; Pardo-De-Santayana, M.; Soukand, R.; Svanberg, I.; Kalle, R. Wild food plant use in 21st century Europe, the disapperance of old traditions and the search for new ciusines involving wild edibles. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 2012, 81, 359–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hearst, C.; McCollum, G.; Nelson, D.; Ballard, L.M.; Millar, B.C.; Goldsmith, C.E.; Rooney, P.J.; Loughrey, A.; Moore, J.E.; Rao, J.R. Antibacterial activity of elder (Sambucus nigra L.) flower or berry against hospital pathogens. J. Med. Plant Res. 2010, 4, 1805–1809. [Google Scholar]
  33. Krawitz, C.; Mraheil, M.A.; Stein, M.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Domann, E.; Pleschka, S.; Hain, T. Inhibitory activity of a standardized elderberry liquid extract against clini-cally-relevant human respiratory bacterial pathogens and influenza A and B viruses. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2011, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Galić, J.; Dragowić-Uzlec, V.; Levaj, B.; Bursać Kovecevic, V.; Plestić, S.; Arnautović, S. The Polyphenols Stability, Enzyme Activity and Physico-Chemical Parameters During Producing Wild Elderberry Concentrated Juice. Agri. Consp. Scient. 2019, 74, 181–186. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kozos, K.; Ochmian, I. Porównanie jakości kilku gatunków owoców o ciemnym zabarwieniu skórki uprawnych i pozyskanych ze stanowisk naturalnych. [w]: Badania i Rozwój Młodych Naukowców w Polsce. Nyćkowiak, J., Leśny J (red). Młodzi. Nauk. Poznań. 2015, 1, 75–81. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  36. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D.; Łysiak, G.P. Bioactive properties of Sambucus nigra L. as a functional ingredient for food and pharmaceutical industry. J. Funct. Foods 2018, 40, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ochmian, I.; Oszmianski, J.; Skupien, K. Chemical composition, phenolics, and firmness of small black fruits. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2009, 83, 64–69. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mudge, E.; Mudge, E.; Applequist, W.L.; Lister, P.F.; Townesmith, A.K.; Walker, K.M.; Brown, P.N. Variation of select flavonols and chlorogenic acid content of elderberry collected throughout the Eastern United States. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2016, 47, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Leja, M.; Mareczek, A.; Nanaszko, B. Antyoksydacyjne właściwości owoców wybranych gatunków dziko rosnących drzew i krzewów. Rocz. AR. Pozn. 2007, 383, 327–331. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  40. Anton, A.M.; Pintea, A.M.; Rugină, D.O.; Sconţa, Z.M.; Hanganu, D.; Vlase, L.; Benedec, D. Preliminary studies on the chemical characterization an antioxidant capacity of polyphenols from Sambucus sp. Wstępne badania nad charakterystyką chemiczną i zdolnością antyoksydacyjną polifenoli firmy Sambucus sp. Dig. J. Nanometer Bios. 2013, 8, 973–980. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee, J.; Finn, C.E. Anthocyanins and other polyphenolics in American elderberry (Sambucus canadensis) and European elderberry (S. nigra) cultivars. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2007, 87, 2665–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bronnum-Hansen, K.; Jacobsen, F.; Flink, J.M. Anthocyanin colourants from elderbeny (Sumbucus nigra L.). 1. Process considerations for production of liquid extract. J. Fd. Technol. 1985, 20, 703–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vulić, J.J.; Vračar, L.O.; Šumić, Z.M. Chemical characteristics of cultivated elderberry fruit. Acta Period. Technol. 2008, 39, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Młynarczyk, K.; Walkowiak-Tomczak, D. Wpływ zabiegów technologicznych i pochodzenia surowca na aktywność przeciwutleniającą i właściwości fizyczno-chemiczne soku z bzu czarnego. Nauka Przyr. Technol. 2017, 11, 385–395. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  45. Roschek, B.; Fink, R.C.; McMichael, M.D.; Li, D.; Alberte, R.S. Elderberry flavonoids bind to and prevent H1N1 infection in vitro. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1255–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Piątkowska, E.; Witkowicz, R.; Pisulewska, E. Antocyjany—Charakterystyka, występowanie i oddziaływanie na organizm człowieka. Żywn. Nauka. Technol. Jakość. 2011, 4, 24–35. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  47. Bagchi, D.; Roy, S.; Patel, V. Safety and whole-body antioxidant potential of a novel anthocyanin-rich formulation of edible berries. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2006, 281, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zielińska-Pisklak, M. Bez czarny (Sambucus nigra) domowy sposób nie tylko na grypę i przeziębienie. Lek. W. Polsce. 2013, 23, 48–54. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  49. Senica, M.; Stampar, F.; Mikulic-Petkovsek, M. Harmful (cyanogenic Glycoside) and Beneficial (phenolic) Compounds in Different Sambucus Species. J. Berry Res. 2019, 9, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Appenteng, M.K.; Krueger, R.; Johnson, M.C.; Ingold, H.; Bell, R.; Thomas, A.L.; Greenlief, C.M. Cyanogenic glycoside analysis in american elderberry. Molecules 2021, 26, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cowan, M.M. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 564–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ou, S.; Kwok, K. Ferulic acid: Pharmaceutical functions, preparation and applications in foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2004, 84, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Papadopoulou, C.; Soulti, K.; Roussis, J.G. Potential Antimicrobial activity of red and white wine phenolic extracts against strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 43, 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  54. Przybylska-Balcerek, A.; Góral, T.; Kurasiak-Popowska, D.; Stuper-Szablewska, K. Phenolic acids in various genotypes of cereals grown in Poland in the years 2017–2018. Acad. J. Med. Plants 2019, 7, 092–099. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ozcan, T.A.; Akpinar-Bayizit, A.; Yilmaz-Ersan, L.; Delikanli, B. Phenolics in Human Health. Int. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2014, 5, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Czechowska, S.K.; Markiewicz, R.; Borawska, M.H. Microbiological activity and cytotoxicity of selected phenolic acids in in vitro tests. Bromat. Chem. Toksykol. 1992, 3, 959–964. [Google Scholar]
  57. Nowak, H.; Kujawa, R.; Zadernowski, B.; Roczniak Kozłowska, H. Antioxidative and bactericidal properties of phenolic compounds in rapeseeds. Lipid/Fett. 1992, 94, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martins, N.; Barros, L.; Henriques, M.; Silva, S.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Activity of phenolic compounds from plant origin against Candida species. Ind. Crops Prod. 2015, 74, 648–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Haslam, E.; Lilley, T.H.; Warminski, E.; Liao, H.; Cai, Y.; Martin, R.; Goudling, P.N.; Luck, G. Polyphenol complexation. A study in molecular recognition. ACS Symp. Ser. 1992, 506, 8–50. [Google Scholar]
  60. Stachelska, M.A.; Jakubczyk, A.; Więtczak, B.; Tyl, S. Assessment of Yersinia Enterocolitica sensitivity to selected phenolic acids. Food Sci. Technol. Qual. 2012, 2, 88–98. [Google Scholar]
  61. Parus, A. Przeciwutleniające i farmakologiczne właściwości kwasów fenolowych. Post. Fitoter. 2013, 1, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kędzia, B.; Hołderna-Kędzia, E. Toxicity and allergenic action of propolis. Adv. Phytother. 2001, 4, 282–291. [Google Scholar]
  63. Efenberger-Szmechtyk, M.; Nowak, A.; Czyżowska, A. Polifenole liści aroni jako naturalne związki przeciwdrobnoustrojowe. XII Konf. Nauk. cyklu Żywność XXI wieku Kraków wrzesień. 2016, 200, 22–23. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  64. Vieira, V.; Pires, T.C.S.P.; Calhelha, R.C.; Alves, M.J.; Ferreira, O.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Phenolic profile, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of Juglans regia L. (walnut) leaves from the Northeast of Portugal. Ind. Crops.Prod. 2019, 134, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pernin, A.; Dubois-Brissonnet, F.; Roux, S.; Masson, M.; Bosc, V.; Noëlle Maillard, M. Phenolic compounds can delaythe oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and the growth of Listeria monocytogenes: Structure-activityrelationships. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 5401–5408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Camargo, A.C.; Bismara Regitano-d’Arce, M.A.; Rasera, G.B.; Canniatti-Brazaca, S.G.; Prado-Silva, L.; Alvarenga, V.O.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Shahidi, F. Phenolic acids and flavonoids of peanut by-products: Antioxidant capacity andantimicrobial effects. Food Chem. 2017, 237, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ali, R.M.; Houghton, P.J.; Raman, A.; Hoult, J.R.S. Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of extracts and constituents of Oroxylum indicum. Phytomedicine. 1998, 5, 375–381. [Google Scholar]
  68. Malterund, K.; Bremns, E.; Faegri, A.; Moe, T.; Sandanger, E. Flavonoids from the wood of Salix caprea as inhibitors of wood–destroying fungi. J. Nat. Prod. 1985, 48, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Iwagawa, T.; Kawasaki, J.; Hase, T.; Sako, S.; Ōkubo, T.; Ishida, M.; Kim, M. An acetylated flavonol glycoside from Lasiobema japonica. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 1013–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Basile, A.; Giordano, S.; López-Sáez, J.A.; Cobianchi, R.C. Antibacterial activity of pure flavonoids isolated from mosses. Phytochemistry 1999, 52, 1479–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Oksus, S.; Ayyildiz, H.; Johansson, C. 6-methoxylated and C-glycosyl flavonoids from Centaurea species. J. Nat. Prod. 1985, 47, 902–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Waage, S.K.; Hedin, P.A. Quercetin 3-O-galactosyl-(1Æ6)-glucoside, a compound from narrowleaf vetch with antibacterial activity. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 243–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, H.; Orjala, J.; Sticher, O.; Rali, T. Acylated flavonol glycosides from leaves of Stenochlaena palustris. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mitrokotsa, D.; Demetzos, C.; Harvala, C.; Mentis, A.; Perez, S.; Kokkinopoulo, D. Bioactive compounds from the buds of Plantanus orientalis and isolation of a new kaempferol glycoside. Planta. Med. 1993, 59, 517–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, Y.; Hamburger, M.; Gueho, J.; Hostettmann, K. Antimicrobial flavonoids from Psiadia trinervia and their methylated and acetylated derivatives. Phytochemistry 1989, 28, 2323–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Van Puyvelde, L.; De Kimpe, N.; Costa, J.; Munyjabo, V.; Nyirankuliza, S.; Hakizamungu, E.; Schamp, N. Isolation of flavonoids and chalcone from Helichrysum odoratissimum and synthesis of helichrysetin. J. Nat. Prod. 1989, 52, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Heaney, R.P. Factors Influencing the Measurement of Bioavailability, Taking Calcium as a Model. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1376–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Lafay, S.; Gil-Izquierdo, A. Bioavailability of phenolic acids. Phytochem. Rev. 2008, 7, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Falcone Ferreyra, M.L.; Rius, S.P.; Casati, P. Flavonoids: Biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Przybylska-Balcerek, A.; Frankowski, J.; Stuper-Szablewska, K. Bioactive compounds in sorghum. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Stuper-Szablewska, K.; Kurasiak-Popowska, D.; Nawracała, J. Quantitative profile of phenolic acids and antioxidant activity of wheat grain exposed to stress. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245, 1595–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Johan, F.; Jafri, M.Z.; Lim, H.S.; Wan Maznah, W.O. Laboratory measurement: Chlorophyll-a concentration measurement with acetone method using spectrophotometer. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Selangor, Malaysia,, 9–12 December 2014; pp. 744–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Giusti, M.M.; Wrolstad, R.E. Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-visible spectroscopy. In Handbook of Food Analytical Chemistry—Pigment, Colorants, Flavors, Texture, and Bio-Active Food Components; Wrolstad, R.E., Ed.; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  84. Gozdecka, G.; Kaniewska, J.; Domaradzki, M.; Jędryczka, K. Ocena zawartości wybranych składników bioaktywnych w przetworach z borówki czernicy, Żywność. Nauka Technol. Jakość 2015, 1, 170–180. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sztangret, J.; Korzeniowska, A.; Niemirowicz-Szczyt, K. Ocena plonowania oraz zawartość suchej masy i związków karotenoidowych w nowych mieszańcach dyni olbrzymiej (Cucurbita maxima Duch). Folia Hort. 2001, 13, 437–443. [Google Scholar]
  86. PN-EN 12136:2000, β-karotenu wg PN-90/A-75101/12; Fruit and Vegetable Juices-Determination of Total Carotenoid Content and Individual Carotenoid Fractions; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1 December 2013.
  87. Šmilauer, P.; Lepš, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO; Cambridge University: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
Molecules 26 02910 g001a 550Molecules 26 02910 g001b 550
Figure 1. Representative chromatograms elderberry fruits extracts from UPLC/PAD of samples (a)–phenolic acids, (b)–flavonoids and a comparison of the most diversified samples (samples 5, 18, 20, and 36) (c)–phenolic acids (d)–flavonoids. (phenolic acids: 1–gallic acid, 2–4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 3–vanillic acid, 4–syringic acid, 5–vanilin, 6–benzoic acid, 7–chlorogenic acid, 8–protocatechuic acid, 9–salicylic acid, 10–caffeic acid, 11–p-coumaric acid, 12–ferulic acid, 13–sinapic acid, 14–t-cinnamic acid, 15–rosmarinic acid; flavonoids: 1–apigenin, 2–catechin, 3–kaempferol, 4–luteoline, 5–naringenin, 6–quercetin, 7–rutin, 8–vitexin).
Figure 1. Representative chromatograms elderberry fruits extracts from UPLC/PAD of samples (a)–phenolic acids, (b)–flavonoids and a comparison of the most diversified samples (samples 5, 18, 20, and 36) (c)–phenolic acids (d)–flavonoids. (phenolic acids: 1–gallic acid, 2–4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 3–vanillic acid, 4–syringic acid, 5–vanilin, 6–benzoic acid, 7–chlorogenic acid, 8–protocatechuic acid, 9–salicylic acid, 10–caffeic acid, 11–p-coumaric acid, 12–ferulic acid, 13–sinapic acid, 14–t-cinnamic acid, 15–rosmarinic acid; flavonoids: 1–apigenin, 2–catechin, 3–kaempferol, 4–luteoline, 5–naringenin, 6–quercetin, 7–rutin, 8–vitexin).
Molecules 26 02910 g001aMolecules 26 02910 g001b
Molecules 26 02910 g002 550
Figure 2. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) (n = 38) Dependencies between groups of phenolic acids, organic acids, pigments, sugars and their influence on the development of pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms.
Figure 2. Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) (n = 38) Dependencies between groups of phenolic acids, organic acids, pigments, sugars and their influence on the development of pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms.
Molecules 26 02910 g002
Molecules 26 02910 g003 550
Figure 3. DCA (n = 38) A diagram showing the distribution of the elderberry extract samples in terms of the content of polyphenols and flavonoids.
Figure 3. DCA (n = 38) A diagram showing the distribution of the elderberry extract samples in terms of the content of polyphenols and flavonoids.
Molecules 26 02910 g003
Molecules 26 02910 g004 550
Figure 4. DCA (n = 38) A diagram showing the distribution of the elderberry extract samples in terms of the antioxidative activity and the content of organic acids, pigments, and sugars. Four homogeneous groups were identified.
Figure 4. DCA (n = 38) A diagram showing the distribution of the elderberry extract samples in terms of the antioxidative activity and the content of organic acids, pigments, and sugars. Four homogeneous groups were identified.
Molecules 26 02910 g004
Table
Table 1. The total phenolic content (TPC), total phenolic acid content (TAC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and ABTS+ in the elderberry extracts.
Table 1. The total phenolic content (TPC), total phenolic acid content (TAC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and ABTS+ in the elderberry extracts.
MinMaxMeanSD
ABTS+ (µmol Trolox equivalent/g extract)647.21721.25684.231.09.1975
TPC (mg GAE/g extract)3.2318.9013.284.34
TFC (mg RUTE/g extract)11.25263.50114.9864.14
Table
Table 2. The content of phenolic acids in the elderberry extract.
Table 2. The content of phenolic acids in the elderberry extract.
[mg/g Extract]MinMaxMeanSD
gallic0.348.323.341.82
4-hydroxybenzoic0.196.211.361.21
vanillic0.020.250.130.06
syringic0.423.091.610.75
vanillin0.846.193.131.44
benzoic2.0930.9612.365.98
chlorogenic25.50254.07139.0960.93
protocatechuic0.241.610.890.38
salicylic0.794.432.561.03
caffeic0.265.532.031.40
p-cumaric0.161.210.610.26
ferulic11.2067.0934.6314.84
sinapic18.45164.7572.8430.96
t-cinnamic12.6090.2451.2921.98
rosmarinic0.162.240.790.41
The content of flavonoids in the elderberry extract
[mg/g extract]MinMaxMeanSD
apigenin18.47129.4366.7427.01
catechin0.030.710.230.17
kaempferol0.282.501.010.61
luteolin2.7649.1315.8510.24
naringenin8.5365.2730.7112.83
quercetin97.38504.88306.60125.02
rutin124.982773.711105.39604.12
vitexin0.132.981.350.90
Table
Table 3. The content of organic acids (LMWOAS) and sugars in the elderberry extract.
Table 3. The content of organic acids (LMWOAS) and sugars in the elderberry extract.
[mg/g Extract]MinMaxMeanSD
citric0.761.241.030.14
malic0.230.370.290.05
shikimic0.030.250.140.06
fumaric0.030.120.070.03
glucose3.087.404.891.44
fructose3.889.385.911.77
Table
Table 4. The content of pigments, carotenoids, chlorophyll, and anthocyanins in the elderberry extract.
Table 4. The content of pigments, carotenoids, chlorophyll, and anthocyanins in the elderberry extract.
[mg/g Extract]MinMaxMeanSD
Total carotenoids25.5075.0047.9315.92
Total chlorophyll0.080.540.290.14
TAC75.18149.78109.8122.62
Table
Table 5. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) [%] of the elderberry extracts.
Table 5. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) [%] of the elderberry extracts.
Tested BacteriaMinMaxMean Value
Pathogenic bacteriaE. coli (PCM 2793)0.050.50.275
S. enteritidis (PCM 2548)0.10.50.3
L. inoccua (DSM 20649)0.10.50.3
Food-spoilage bacteriaP. fluorescens (PCM 2123)0.10.50.3
P. fragii (PCM 1856)0.050.50.275
P. mirabilis (PCM 1361)0.050.50.275
Control bacteriaM. luteus (PCM 525)0.050.50.275
Table
Table 6. Variance explained by the first four DCA axes (Figure 3).
Table 6. Variance explained by the first four DCA axes (Figure 3).
Axes1234Total Eigenvalues
Eigenvalue0.32790.25670.08210.04582.115
Length of gradient2.8962.1561.3911.097
Polyphenols and flavonoids–
samples correlations		0.9190.9070.5440.655
Polyphenols and flavonoids–
samples relation		35.737.10.00.0
Table
Table 7. Variance explained by the first four DCA axes (Figure 4).
Table 7. Variance explained by the first four DCA axes (Figure 4).
Axes1234Total Eigenvalues
Eigenvalue0.37210.16970.65120.03292.059
Length of gradient3.0881.8731.2551.066
Polyphenols and flavonoids–correlations in
samples		0.9510.7420.4210.235
Polyphenols and flavonoids–correlations in
samples		41.225.80.00.0
Table
Table 8. The mass of the extract obtained from individual Sambucus nigra L. samples.
Table 8. The mass of the extract obtained from individual Sambucus nigra L. samples.
No.LocationVoivodeshipMass of Extract [g]
151°24′99′′N 21°58′16′′ELublin Voivodeship0.25
252°01′93′′N 17°78′44′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.19
352°65′67′′N 16°95′29′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.65
453°31′56′′N 20°67′35′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.39
552°99′64′′N 18°70′72′′EKuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship0.20
649°39′96′′N 22°44′98′′EPodkarpackie Voivodeship0.79
749°27′54′′N 19°86′88′′ELesser Poland Voivodeship0.48
851°25′05′′N 22°57′01′′ELublin Voivodeship0.10
951°62′26′′N 17°94′28′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.69
1050°29′68′′N 16°65′20′′ELower Silesian Voivodeship0.44
1153°92′82′′N 14°44′89′′EWest Pomeranian Voivodeship0.80
1253°91′31′′N 14°52′00′′EWest Pomeranian Voivodeship1.05
1353°47′30′′N 17°89′64′′EKuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship1.83
1453°48′46′′N 18°07′17′′EKuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship0.74
1553°77′66′′N 20°47′65′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship0.61
1653°39′84′′N 20°94′62′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship0.16
1753°58′34′′N 20°28′16′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship1.04
1854°21′38′′N 21°74′16′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship0.28
1953°81′29′′N 20°35′80′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship0.40
2053°59′70′′N 19°85′43′′EWarmian-Masurian Voivodeship1.08
2154°47′25′′N 16°63′07′′EWest Pomeranian Voivodeship0.12
2251°30′05′′N 16°83′01′′ELower Silesian Voivodeship0.37
2354°16′88′′N 17°49′22′′EPomeranian Voivodeship0.50
2453°26′97′′N 16°46′70′′EWest Pomeranian Voivodeship0.16
2552°39′91′′N 16°71′89′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship1.38
2652°97′29′′N 16°54′44′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.18
2753°27′61′′N 15°46′33′′EWest Pomeranian Voivodeship0.71
2852°77′12′′N 16°87′97′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.94
2952°80′71′′N 17°19′73′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.11
3051°76′81′′N 15°87′48′′ELubusz Voivodeship1.05
3152°10′76′′N 19°94′47′′EŁódź Voivodeship0.56
3253°24′68′′N 17°01′70′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.22
3352°04′58′′N 18°36′86′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.57
3452°53′95′′N 16°26′42′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship0.16
3551°76′87′′N 19°45′69′′EŁódź Voivodeship0.52
3652°47′75′′N 16°87′72′′EGreater Poland Voivodeship2.12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Przybylska-Balcerek, A.; Szablewski, T.; Szwajkowska-Michałek, L.; Świerk, D.; Cegielska-Radziejewska, R.; Krejpcio, Z.; Suchowilska, E.; Tomczyk, Ł.; Stuper-Szablewska, K. Sambucus Nigra Extracts–Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds. Molecules 2021, 26, 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102910

AMA Style

Przybylska-Balcerek A, Szablewski T, Szwajkowska-Michałek L, Świerk D, Cegielska-Radziejewska R, Krejpcio Z, Suchowilska E, Tomczyk Ł, Stuper-Szablewska K. Sambucus Nigra Extracts–Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds. Molecules. 2021; 26(10):2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Przybylska-Balcerek, Anna, Tomasz Szablewski, Lidia Szwajkowska-Michałek, Dariusz Świerk, Renata Cegielska-Radziejewska, Zbigniew Krejpcio, Elżbieta Suchowilska, Łukasz Tomczyk, and Kinga Stuper-Szablewska. 2021. "Sambucus Nigra Extracts–Natural Antioxidants and Antimicrobial Compounds" Molecules 26, no. 10: 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26102910

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop