Next Article in Journal
Caryocar brasiliense Cambess. Pulp Oil Supplementation Reduces Total Cholesterol, LDL-c, and Non-HDL-c in Animals
Next Article in Special Issue
Transformed Shoots of Dracocephalum forrestii W.W. Smith from Different Bioreactor Systems as a Rich Source of Natural Phenolic Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Phytochemical Identification, Acute, and Sub-Acute Oral Toxicity Studies of the Foliar Extract of Withania frutescens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isoliquiritigenin Pretreatment Induces Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Hormesis and Attenuates Cisplatin-Induced Oxidative Stress and Damage in LLC-PK1 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Volatile Phenols—Important Contributors to the Aroma of Plant-Derived Foods

1
Chair of Molecular Food Technology, Institute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 19B, 53115 Bonn, Germany
2
Chair of Food Chemistry, Institute of Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 19B, 53115 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2020, 25(19), 4529; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194529
Submission received: 2 September 2020 / Revised: 26 September 2020 / Accepted: 30 September 2020 / Published: 2 October 2020

Abstract

:
Volatile phenols like phenylpropanoid and benzoid compounds originate from the aromatic amino acid phenylalanine, which is biosynthesized via the shikimate/arogenate pathway. These volatile compounds contribute to the aroma of a number of economically important plant-derived foods like herbs, spices and fruits. The sequestration of numerous phenylpropanoid and benzoid compounds as glycosides occurs widely in fruits, and this pool represents an important source of flavor that can be released during storage and processing. Therefore, this review will provide an overview of the biosynthesis of free and glycosylated phenylpropanoid and benzoid compounds and their reactions during food processing, which both lead to the generation of odor-active volatile phenols in plant-derived foods.

1. Introduction

Intensive research during the last two decades has shown that flavonoids, stilbenes, tannins, phenylpropanoids, lignans and coumarins (often generically called (poly)phenols to illustrate that this class of compounds possess one or multiple aromatic rings and at least one hydroxyl group) are important secondary metabolites in plant-derived foods. Over 7000 known structures have been reported so far, illustrating the high structural diversity of these natural products [1]. The pronounced dynamics in cross-disciplinary research on (poly)phenols are mainly due to their putative health benefits on the one side and their role as technologically valuable natural food ingredients on the other side; the latter intended to replace synthetic food additives. For example, polyphenols have been associated with positive effects on cardiometabolic health, cognition, type II diabetes, obesity, neuroinflammation and others [2,3,4,5]. More recent research has demonstrated that a significant part of the polyphenols ingested is metabolized by human endogenous enzymes and the gut microbiota, and increasing evidence indicates that the metabolites, rather than the parent polyphenols present in the plant, constitute the bioactive compounds [6,7,8]. From a technological point of view, polyphenols are of interest because they contribute to color [9], antioxidant activity [10] and preservation of foods [11]. In addition, some phenolic compounds, such as caftaric acid and tannins, are known to impart bitterness and astringency [12,13,14]. However, (poly)phenols can also shape the aroma of foods if they are volatile as such or serve as precursors for volatile degradation products. This review is therefore focused on highly odiferous volatile phenols that contribute to the aroma of foods, either as positive contributors or as so-called off-flavor compounds in tainted products of diminished quality.

2. The Concept of the Chemical Odorant Space

Food contains over 10,000 volatiles with molecular weights below 290 Da [15]. However, while volatility is a prerequisite for a compound to be perceived nasally, only a small fraction of these molecules contributes to the overall aroma of food. So far, about 230 volatiles have been identified as so-called “key food odorants” (KFOs) [16]. These KFOs are the best natural agonists for approximately 400 human olfactory receptors (ORs) [17]. Aroma research has shown that the distinctive aroma for 227 different food commodities is determined by a relatively small subset of 3 to 40 KFOs. For example, the distinct butter aroma consists of only three compounds: diacetyl, (R)-δ-lactone and butyric acid. These three compounds are present in butter at concentrations above their odor threshold values and represent the chemical odor code for a buttery aroma. The 230 KFOs span, therefore, the chemical odorant space of our food.

3. Odor-Active Phenols in Food

About 10% of all known KFOs are volatile phenols, and their structures are listed in Figure 1, together with their trivial names and, in parentheses, their frequency of occurrence in percent in 227 food samples.
The top three odor-active phenols in food are vanillin, guaiacol and 4-vinylguaiacol. In spices, herbs and fruits, phenols with a C3 sidechain are found frequently, whereas in fermented food like alcoholic beverages, the C3 sidechain is often shortened to one or two C atoms by microbial degradation (see below). The aromatic ring can bear up to three hydroxyl groups. However, no more than one hydroxyl group is present in free form in these structures, and polyphenolic molecules are missing completely because of their greatly reduced volatility, which excludes any aroma activity.

4. Perception of Odor-Active Phenols

The biochemical mechanism for perception of odor-active phenols is now well understood and is a remarkable piece of Nobel Prize winning research (Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2004 for Richard Axel and Lina B. Buck for their discoveries of odorant receptors and the organization of the olfactory system) [17]. Odor perception is initiated by an odorant molecule binding to receptors that are located in the cilia of olfactory receptor cells in the nasal epithelium. The cells are thus activated and send electric signals that are relayed in the so-called glomeruli in the olfactory bulb. The signals are transmitted to higher regions of the brain, and the integrated signal pattern is finally interpreted as a specific odor impression. It is clear that these olfactory receptors (ORs) play a key role in odorant perception. Up to now, for approximately 40% of the 400 functional human ORs, agonists have been identified in bioassays [18]. Research on structure–activity relationships of the human OR10G receptors has shown that these receptors are broadly tuned to volatile phenols (Table 1) [19]. Obviously, the phenolic foodborne stimulus space has co-evolved with our olfactory receptors. It is utmost remarkable that these nasal receptor proteins are also expressed in other tissues like the skin, the intestine and even in white blood cells. Thus, it is conceivable that these small molecules exert other biological effects on the human body beside their odor activity, and once ingested they may overcome cellular barriers and reach other target tissues. Recent research on low-molecular weight metabolites from polyphenols as effectors for attenuating neuroinflammation and for prevention of cardiovascular diseases shows that this rationale is, indeed, valid [4,6].

5. Generation of Volatile Phenols in Food

5.1. De Novo Biosynthesis in Planta

In planta, volatile phenols are generated from phenylalanine (Figure 2) that delivers the C6C3 building block of all phenylpropanoids [20,21]. The key enzyme is the well-characterized enzyme phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) that controls the flux through this pathway [22]. The pathway, up to the production of coumaryl and coniferyl alcohol, is shared with the lignin biosynthetic pathway. Hydroxylation of the aromatic ring and subsequent reduction of the corresponding acetate ester yields volatile phenylpropanoids of the widespread C6C3-type. The enzymes responsible for acetate ester formation and reduction have been characterized in sweet basil and anise [23,24,25]. The genes involved in the biosynthesis of methoxylated phenylpropenes have recently been cloned and characterized, notably in strawberry, apple, tomato and grape [20]. For example, manipulating the levels of phenylpropenes validated the importance of eugenol to strawberry fruit aroma [26,27], thus demonstrating how this knowledge can ultimately lead to the improvement of crops with respect to their odor traits. Chain-shortening by β-oxidation finally yields C6C1- and C6-type benzoids. A special case is the generation of vanillin from ferulic acid, which is catalyzed by the action of a single enzyme that has recently been cloned and characterized from Vanilla planifolia [28,29]. Likewise, a gene for p-hydroxystyrene biosynthesis has been characterized in Pyrus communis that encodes a phenolic acid decarboxylase yielding p-hydroxystyrene from p-coumaric acid [30].

5.2. Microbial Formation of Volatile Phenols

During food processing by fermentation, microorganisms are capable of degrading nonvolatile phenylpropanoids to volatile, highly odiferous phenols. Showcased is the yeast-mediated formation of ethyl- and allylphenols by decarboxylation and reduction during the alcoholic fermentation in wine and beer production (Figure 3) [32]. If these degradation products are formed in excessively high concentrations, aroma defects, like a “horse sweat” note in wine, can develop [33,34].
Degradation of aromatic amino acids, such as tyrosine, during fermentation can yield volatile phenols as well. The cresol-forming enzyme p-hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase (HPAD) is a member of the glycyl radical enzyme (GRE) superfamily and plays prominent roles in the primary metabolism of anaerobic-fermenting bacteria (Figure 4) [35].
The catalytic mechanism of HPAD has been studied in detail and involves activation of p-hydroxyphenylacetate (HPA) by concerted abstraction of an electron and the phenolic proton to generate a phenoxy-acetate radical anion, with the radical delocalized over the aromatic ring [36]. Decarboxylation and H-radical rebound finally yields p-cresol, which is released from the enzyme by exchange with HPA.

5.3. Thermal Formation of Volatile Phenols During Food Processing

Volatile phenols can be formed from labile precursors during thermal treatment of food [37]. In soft pretzels, 4-vinylguaiacol can be generated from hemicelluloses like arabinoxylans that contain covalently bound ferulic acid, which is liberated during the alkaline treatment of the dough and thermally decarboxylated by the subsequent baking process (Figure 5) [38]. During coffee roasting, decarboxylation of ferulic acid yields 4-vinylguaiacol, guaiacol and phenol [39]. The pyrolysis of wood yields a variety of volatile phenols as well that are responsible for the antioxidative and aromatic properties of smoke, which is used for food conservation by smoking [40] and wine aromatization by storage in toasted barrels [41,42].

6. Glycosidically Bound Volatile Phenols in Food

6.1. Structures of Glycosidically Bound Phenols

Sequestration of phenols as glycosides occurs commonly in fruit, and this so-called bound pool represents an important source of flavor compounds that can be released during processing, as well as by controlled application of enzymes, heat or acids [43]. Mono- and diglycosides like glucosides, arabinofuranosylglucosides, rutinosides and apiofuranosylglucosides are structures frequently occurring in fruits (Figure 6) [31].

6.2. Biosynthesis of Glycosidically Bound Phenols

In general, the biosynthesis of glycosidically bound small molecule volatiles is catalyzed by uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferases (UDP-GTs) [44,45]. These enzymes use UDP-activated sugars as cofactors and transfer the sugar moiety onto the aglycone by an SN2-type reaction with inversion of the configuration at the anomeric C-atom, resulting in the formation of β-glycosides. By sequential biosynthesis, further sugar molecules can be transferred onto the first one by forming diglycosides like apiofuranosyl-glucosides (Figure 7). All plant UDP-GTs show a typical GT-B fold-structure and harbor a highly conserved plant secondary product glycosyltransferase (PSPG) motif that enables UDP-sugar donor binding at the active site. Cloning, heterologous expression and biochemical characterization of UDP-glucose: small-molecule GTs from Vitis vinifera have shown that these enzymes show acceptor promiscuity and glycosylate structurally diverse substrates like monoterpenes, (poly)phenols and aliphatic alcohols [46,47,48].
However, this promiscuity can be the cause of smoky off-flavor notes in wines [49]. Volatile phenols that are generated during bush fires can penetrate into the leaf tissue of grapevine. It was shown that these phenols can be glycosylated by promiscuous GTs, translocated into the berry and liberated during storage of the produced wine, thus tainting this product with a smoky off-flavor [50,51,52].

7. Conclusions

This review has provided an overview of the biosynthesis of free and glycosylated phenylpropanoid and benzoid compounds and their reactions during food processing, with an emphasis on the odor-active phenols and their glycosylated precursors. Molecular sensory science and the concept of the chemical odorant space have impressively shown that these volatile phenols are indeed important contributors to the aroma of plant-derived foods. Knowledge on the biosynthesis of these target molecules, including the underlying regulation mechanisms, will ultimately lead to the improvement of crops with respect to their odor traits [53].

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.S. and M.W.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

With pleasure, we acknowledge the contributions of our dedicated coworkers whose names are cited in the references.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Buckingham, J. Dictionary of Natural Products Version 8.1, 1st ed.; Chapman & Hall/CRC: London, UK, 2013; ISBN 978-0-412-49150-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fraga, C.G.; Croft, K.D.; Kennedy, D.O.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. The effects of polyphenols and other bioactives on human health. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bensalem, J.; Dudonné, S.; Gaudout, D.; Servant, L.; Calon, F.; Desjardins, Y.; Layé, S.; Lafenetre, P.; Pallet, V. Polyphenol-rich extract from grape and blueberry attenuates cognitive decline and improves neuronal function in aged mice. J. Nutr. Sci. 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Carregosa, D.; Carecho, R.; Figueira, I.N.; Santos, C. Low-Molecular Weight Metabolites from Polyphenols as Effectors for Attenuating Neuroinflammation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1790–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Márquez Campos, E.; Stehle, P.; Simon, M.-C. Microbial Metabolites of Flavan-3-Ols and Their Biological Activity. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cassidy, A.; Minihane, A.-M. The role of metabolism (and the microbiome) in defining the clinical efficacy of dietary flavonoids. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Selma, M.V.; Espín, J.C.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Interaction between Phenolics and Gut Microbiota: Role in Human Health. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 6485–6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Weber, F.; Boch, K.; Schieber, A. Influence of copigmentation on the stability of spray dried anthocyanins from blackberry. LWT 2017, 75, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Tsao, R. Dietary polyphenols, oxidative stress and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2016, 8, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Linden, M.; Brinckmann, C.; Feuereisen, M.M.; Review; Schieber, A. Effects of structural differences on the antibacterial activity of biflavonoids from fruits of the Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi). Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Frank, S.; Wollmann, N.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Reconstitution of the Flavor Signature of Dornfelder Red Wine on the Basis of the Natural Concentrations of Its Key Aroma and Taste Compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 8866–8874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schöbel, N.; Radtke, D.; Kyereme, J.; Wollmann, N.; Cichy, A.; Obst, K.; Kallweit, K.; Kletke, O.; Minovi, A.; Dazert, S.; et al. Astringency Is a Trigeminal Sensation That Involves the Activation of G Protein–Coupled Signaling by Phenolic Compounds. Chem. Senses 2014, 39, 471–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hufnagel, J.C.; Hofmann, T. Orosensory-Directed Identification of Astringent Mouthfeel and Bitter-Tasting Compounds in Red Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 1376–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Maarse, H.; Visscher, C.A. Volatile Compounds in Food: Qualitative and Quantitative Data; TNO-CIVO Food Analysis Institute: Zeist, The Netherlands, 1989; ISBN 978-90-6743-168-2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dunkel, A.; Steinhaus, M.; Kotthoff, M.; Nowak, B.; Krautwurst, D.; Schieberle, P.; Hofmann, T. Nature’s Chemical Signatures in Human Olfaction: A Foodborne Perspective for Future Biotechnology. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 7124–7143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Block, E. Molecular Basis of Mammalian Odor Discrimination: A Status Report. J.Agric. Food Chem. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Trimmer, C.; Keller, A.; Murphy, N.R.; Snyder, L.L.; Willer, J.R.; Nagai, M.H.; Katsanis, N.; Vosshall, L.B.; Matsunami, H.; Mainland, J.D. Genetic variation across the human olfactory receptor repertoire alters odor perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 9475–9480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Veithen, A.; Philippeau, M.; Chatelain, P. High Throughput Receptor Screening Assays. In Springer Handbook of Odor; Buettner, A., Ed.; Springer Handbooks; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 57–58. ISBN 978-3-319-26932-0. [Google Scholar]
  20. Atkinson, R.G. Phenylpropenes: Occurrence, Distribution, and Biosynthesis in Fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2259–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vogt, T. Phenylpropanoid Biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 2–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Widhalm, J.R.; Dudareva, N. A Familiar Ring to It: Biosynthesis of Plant Benzoic Acids. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Koeduka, T.; Baiga, T.J.; Noel, J.P.; Pichersky, E. Biosynthesis of t-Anethole in Anise: Characterization of t-Anol/Isoeugenol Synthase and an O-Methyltransferase Specific for a C7-C8 Propenyl Side Chain. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Vassão, D.G.; Gang, D.R.; Koeduka, T.; Jackson, B.; Pichersky, E.; Davin, L.B.; Lewis, N.G. Chavicol formation in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum): Cleavage of an esterified C9 hydroxyl group with NAD(P)H-dependent reduction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2733–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Louie, G.V.; Baiga, T.J.; Bowman, M.E.; Koeduka, T.; Taylor, J.H.; Spassova, S.M.; Pichersky, E.; Noel, J.P. Structure and Reaction Mechanism of Basil Eugenol Synthase. PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hoffmann, T.; Kurtzer, R.; Skowranek, K.; Kießling, P.; Fridman, E.; Pichersky, E.; Schwab, W. Metabolic engineering in strawberry fruit uncovers a dormant biosynthetic pathway. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Medina-Puche, L.; Molina-Hidalgo, F.J.; Boersma, M.; Schuurink, R.C.; López-Vidriero, I.; Solano, R.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.-M.; Caballero, J.L.; Blanco-Portales, R.; Muñoz-Blanco, J. An R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor Regulates Eugenol Production in Ripe Strawberry Fruit Receptacles. Plant Physiol. 2015, 168, 598–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gallage, N.J.; Møller, B.L. Vanilla: The Most Popular Flavour. In Biotechnology of Natural Products; Schwab, W., Lange, B.M., Wüst, M., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 3–24. ISBN 978-3-319-67903-7. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gallage, N.J.; Hansen, E.H.; Kannangara, R.; Olsen, C.E.; Motawia, M.S.; Jørgensen, K.; Holme, I.; Hebelstrup, K.; Grisoni, M.; Møller, B.L. Vanillin formation from ferulic acid in Vanilla planifolia is catalysed by a single enzyme. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Yahyaa, M.; Rachmany, D.; Shaltiel-Harpaz, L.; Nawade, B.; Sadeh, A.; Ibdah, M.; Gerchman, Y.; Holland, D.; Ibdah, M. A Pyrus communis gene for p-hydroxystyrene biosynthesis, has a role in defense against the pear psylla Cacopsylla biden. Phytochemistry 2019, 161, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wüst, M. Biosynthesis of Plant-Derived Odorants. In Springer Handbook of Odor; Buettner, A., Ed.; Springer Handbooks; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 9–10. ISBN 978-3-319-26932-0. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lentz, M. The Impact of Simple Phenolic Compounds on Beer Aroma and Flavor. Fermentation 2018, 4, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Malfeito-Ferreira, M. Two Decades of “Horse Sweat” Taint and Brettanomyces Yeasts in Wine: Where do We Stand Now? Beverages 2018, 4, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Licker, J.L.; Acree, T.E.; Henick-Kling, T. What Is “Brett” (Brettanomyces) Flavor?: A Preliminary Investigation. In Chemistry of Wine Flavor; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1998; Volume 714, pp. 96–115. ISBN 978-0-8412-3592-2. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shisler, K.A.; Broderick, J.B. Glycyl radical activating enzymes: Structure, mechanism, and substrate interactions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 546, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Martins, B.M.; Blaser, M.; Feliks, M.; Ullmann, G.M.; Buckel, W.; Selmer, T. Structural Basis for a Kolbe-Type Decarboxylation Catalyzed by a Glycyl Radical Enzyme. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14666–14674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, D.; Peterson, D.G. Role of hydroxycinnamic acids in food flavor: A brief overview. Phytochem. Rev. 2010, 9, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Schoenauer, S.; Schieberle, P. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in the Crust of Soft Pretzels by Application of the Sensomics Concept. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 7110–7119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Dorfner, R.; Ferge, T.; Kettrup, A.; Zimmermann, R.; Yeretzian, C. Real-Time Monitoring of 4-Vinylguaiacol, Guaiacol, and Phenol during Coffee Roasting by Resonant Laser Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 5768–5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Maga, J.A. The flavor chemistry of wood smoke. Food Rev. Int. 1987, 3, 139–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Garde-Cerdán, T.; Ancín-Azpilicueta, C. Review of quality factors on wine ageing in oak barrels. Trends Food Sci.Technol. 2006, 17, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, B.; Cai, J.; Duan, C.-Q.; Reeves, M.J.; He, F. A Review of Polyphenolics in Oak Woods. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 6978–7014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sarry, J.-E.; Günata, Z. Plant and microbial glycoside hydrolases: Volatile release from glycosidic aroma precursors. Food Chem. 2004, 87, 509–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Schwab, W.; Fischer, T.C.; Giri, A.; Wuest, M. Potential applications of glucosyltransferases in terpene glucoside production: Impacts on the use of aroma and fragrance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schwab, W.; Fischer, T.; Wuest, M. Terpene glucoside production: Improved biocatalytic processes using glycosyltransferases. Eng. Life Sci. 2015, 15, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bönisch, F.; Frotscher, J.; Stanitzek, S.; Rühl, E.; Wüst, M.; Bitz, O.; Schwab, W. A UDP-Glucose: Monoterpenol Glucosyltransferase Adds to the Chemical Diversity of the Grapevine Metabolome. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Bönisch, F.; Frotscher, J.; Stanitzek, S.; Rühl, E.; Wüst, M.; Bitz, O.; Schwab, W. Activity-Based Profiling of a Physiologic Aglycone Library Reveals Sugar Acceptor Promiscuity of Family 1 UDP-Glucosyltransferases from Grape. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bönisch, F.; Frotscher, J.; Stanitzek, S.; Rühl, E.; Bitz, O.; Schwab, W.; Wüst, M. Enantioselectivities of uridine diphosphate-glucose: Monoterpenol glucosyltransferases from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). In Importance of Chirality to Flavor Compounds; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; Volume 1212, pp. 77–83. ISBN 13: 9780841231146. [Google Scholar]
  49. Härtl, K.; Huang, F.-C.; Giri, A.P.; Franz-Oberdorf, K.; Frotscher, J.; Shao, Y.; Hoffmann, T.; Schwab, W. Glucosylation of Smoke-Derived Volatiles in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) is Catalyzed by a Promiscuous Resveratrol/Guaiacol Glucosyltransferase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5681–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Parker, M.; Osidacz, P.; Baldock, G.A.; Hayasaka, Y.; Black, C.A.; Pardon, K.H.; Jeffery, D.W.; Geue, J.P.; Herderich, M.J.; Francis, I.L. Contribution of Several Volatile Phenols and Their Glycoconjugates to Smoke-Related Sensory Properties of Red Wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2629–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hayasaka, Y.; Baldock, G.A.; Parker, M.; Pardon, K.H.; Black, C.A.; Herderich, M.J.; Jeffery, D.W. Glycosylation of Smoke-Derived Volatile Phenols in Grapes as a Consequence of Grapevine Exposure to Bushfire Smoke. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10989–10998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Krstic, M.P.; Johnson, D.L.; Herderich, M.J. Review of smoke taint in wine: Smoke-derived volatile phenols and their glycosidic metabolites in grapes and vines as biomarkers for smoke exposure and their role in the sensory perception of smoke taint. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2015, 21, 537–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wüst, M. Smell of Stress: Identification of Induced Biochemical Pathways Affecting the Volatile Composition and Flavor Quality of Crops. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 3616–3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of volatile odor-active phenols that were detected in 227 food samples [16]. Below each structure the trivial name and, in parentheses, the frequency of occurrence in percent in the 227 food samples are given. Mono- (a), di- (b) and trihydroxylated (c) derivatives are shown.
Figure 1. Structures of volatile odor-active phenols that were detected in 227 food samples [16]. Below each structure the trivial name and, in parentheses, the frequency of occurrence in percent in the 227 food samples are given. Mono- (a), di- (b) and trihydroxylated (c) derivatives are shown.
Molecules 25 04529 g001
Figure 2. Metabolic pathways in plants that lead to the formation of volatile benzoids and phenylpropanoids from phenylalanine [31]. AADC: aromatic amino acid decarboxylase; BAH: benzoic acid 2-hydroxlase; BPB: benzoylCoA:benzylalcohol/2-phenylethanol benzoyltransferase; BSMT: benzoic acid/salicylic acid carboxyl methyltransferase; CoA: coenzyme A; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced form); PAAS: phenylacetaldehyd synthase; PAL: phenylalanine ammonia lyase; SAM: S-adenosyl methionine.
Figure 2. Metabolic pathways in plants that lead to the formation of volatile benzoids and phenylpropanoids from phenylalanine [31]. AADC: aromatic amino acid decarboxylase; BAH: benzoic acid 2-hydroxlase; BPB: benzoylCoA:benzylalcohol/2-phenylethanol benzoyltransferase; BSMT: benzoic acid/salicylic acid carboxyl methyltransferase; CoA: coenzyme A; NADPH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (reduced form); PAAS: phenylacetaldehyd synthase; PAL: phenylalanine ammonia lyase; SAM: S-adenosyl methionine.
Molecules 25 04529 g002
Figure 3. Formation of allyl- and ethylphenols by yeast during fermentation.
Figure 3. Formation of allyl- and ethylphenols by yeast during fermentation.
Molecules 25 04529 g003
Figure 4. Formation of p-cresol by anaerobic-fermenting bacteria. HPAD: p-hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase.
Figure 4. Formation of p-cresol by anaerobic-fermenting bacteria. HPAD: p-hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase.
Molecules 25 04529 g004
Figure 5. Formation of 4-vinylguaiacol from arabinoxylans during soft pretzel production [38].
Figure 5. Formation of 4-vinylguaiacol from arabinoxylans during soft pretzel production [38].
Molecules 25 04529 g005
Figure 6. Structures of glycosidically bound volatile phenols.
Figure 6. Structures of glycosidically bound volatile phenols.
Molecules 25 04529 g006
Figure 7. Sequential biosynthesis of glycosides by uridine diphosphate-glycosyltransferases (UDP-GTs).
Figure 7. Sequential biosynthesis of glycosides by uridine diphosphate-glycosyltransferases (UDP-GTs).
Molecules 25 04529 g007
Table 1. Structure–activity relationship of OR10G receptors [19].
Table 1. Structure–activity relationship of OR10G receptors [19].
StructureOR10G3OR10G4OR10G7OR10G9
Molecules 25 04529 i0011+++++++++
Molecules 25 04529 i002++++++++
Molecules 25 04529 i003 ++++
Molecules 25 04529 i004+ ++++
Molecules 25 04529 i005+++++++++
Molecules 25 04529 i006++++++
1 +: EC50 > 1 mM; ++: EC50 < 1 mM; +++: EC50 < 100 µM; ++++: EC50 < 10 µM.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schieber, A.; Wüst, M. Volatile Phenols—Important Contributors to the Aroma of Plant-Derived Foods. Molecules 2020, 25, 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194529

AMA Style

Schieber A, Wüst M. Volatile Phenols—Important Contributors to the Aroma of Plant-Derived Foods. Molecules. 2020; 25(19):4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schieber, Andreas, and Matthias Wüst. 2020. "Volatile Phenols—Important Contributors to the Aroma of Plant-Derived Foods" Molecules 25, no. 19: 4529. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25194529

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop