Next Article in Journal
Density Functional Theory Analysis of Deltamethrin and Its Determination in Strawberry by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-Hepatitis C Virus Activity of Uridine Derivatives of 2-Deoxy Sugars
Previous Article in Journal
The Possible Reduction Mechanism of Volatile Sulfur Compounds during Durian Wine Fermentation Verified in Modified Buffers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phosphorus Pentachloride Promoted gem-Dichlorination of 2′- and 3′-Deoxynucleosides

by
Fabio Da Paixao Soares
,
Elisabetta Groaz
and
Piet Herdewijn
*
Medicinal Chemistry, Rega Institute for Medical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(6), 1457; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061457
Submission received: 29 May 2018 / Revised: 11 June 2018 / Accepted: 11 June 2018 / Published: 15 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Nucleosides and Nucleotides)

Abstract

:
Halogen substitution at various positions of canonical nucleosides has generated a number of bioactive structural variants. Herein, the synthesis of two unique series of sugar modified nucleosides bearing a gem-dichloro group is presented. The synthetic plan entails the controlled addition of phosphorus pentachloride to suitably protected 2′- or 3′-ketodeoxynucleoside intermediates as the key step, facilitating the rapid construction of such functionalized molecules. Under the same reaction conditions, the highest chemoselectivity was observed for the formation of 2′,2′-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides, while a competing 2′,3′-elimination process occurred in the case of the 3′,3′-dichloro counterparts.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

One promising way to impart biologically favorable properties to natural nucleosides consists in the introduction of one or more halogen substituents into their sugar ring moiety [1,2]. In particular, the replacement of an H atom or OH group by a more electronegative chlorine atom can affect inter and/or intramolecular forces, allowing for instance additional dipolar interactions [3]. This, in combination with the potential conformational changes induced in the parent molecule by the increased atomic size of chlorine [4], may influence the binding of ligands, thus modulating the inhibition of specific targets [5]. Furthermore, the high polarizability associated with chlorine can give rise to London dispersion and consequently lipophilic properties, which may increase the passive diffusion of chlorinated nucleoside derivatives across the cell membrane. In general, chlorine has been widely employed as a bioisostere in drug development to provide a large number of therapeutic agents with a remarkable safety profile for the treatment of a variety of diseases [6]. However, to date the investigation of such structural variation in the field of nucleosides remains underexplored. Recently, phosphoramidate prodrugs of β-d-2′-deoxy-2′,2′-dichlorouridine, which were obtained upon 2′-C-modification of uridine with a gem-dichloro (CCl2) functionality, have been shown to have inhibitory activity against hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication (Figure 1, 1) [7]. Additionally, Zhou et al. reported that the substitution of the 2′-methyl group in sofosbuvir with a chlorine atom generated 2′-chloro-2′-fluoro ribonucleotide prodrugs with pan-genotypic anti-HCV activity (Figure 1, 2) [8].
Various protocols have been reported for the preparation of monochlorinated sugar modified nucleosides. Chlorine has been introduced starting from anhydro nucleosides by using either HCl-Py or HCl-dioxane in the synthesis of seven-membered ring nucleoside analogues [9] as well as 3′- and 2′-chlorinated thymidine derivatives [10,11], respectively. Alternatively, milder conditions have been employed including either a mixture of SOCl2 and hexamethylphosphoramide to achieve the regioselective chlorination at the 5′-position of ribonucleosides [12,13] or lithium chloride via nucleophilic displacement of sulfonyl ester derivatives as in the synthesis of 4′-chloromethyl-2′-deoxy-3′,5′-di-O-isobutyryl-2′-fluorocytidine, a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) polymerase inhibitor [14,15]. Other reagents that have been successfully used are tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) dichlorophosphorane (BDCP) [16] and CCl4/PPh3 [17]. However, most of these methods require multistep protecting group strategies that make them time-consuming, expensive, and low yielding. On the other hand, few efforts have been devoted to the preparation of halogenated nucleosides by condensing the base moiety with a chlorinated carbohydrate. Watanabe et al. described the synthesis of several 2′-halo-5-substituted-arabinofuranosyl derivatives upon coupling of trimethylsilylated pyrimidines with suitably protected 2-fluoro-, 2-chloro-, or 2-bromoarabinosyl bromides in good yields [18]. The glycosylation of 2-deoxy-2,2-dichlorofuranose 1-chloride with N4-Bz-cytosine has also been reported towards the synthesis of β-d-2′-deoxy-2′,2′-dichlorouridine [7]. β-2′-Chloro-α-2′-fluororibonucleoside derivatives were prepared from a β-2-chloro-α-2-fluororibofuranose intermediate, which was in turn obtained from 2-deoxy-d-ribose in five steps using N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS) in the presence of lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (LiHMDS) in the chlorination step [8].
Herein, we describe the unprecedented synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dichloro- (Figure 1, 3) and 2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxynucleoside analogues (Figure 1, 4) bearing both purines and pyrimidines as nucleobases by using PCl5 as a powerful chlorinating agent. In addition, all synthesized compounds were further evaluated for their antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 (IIIB strain) and type 2 (ROD) in MT-4 cell cultures.

2. Results and Discussion

At the start of our synthetic endeavor towards the preparation of compounds of type 3 (Figure 1), we initially considered the preparation of suitably protected 3,3-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxyribose 8 as common synthon for further base condensation reactions (Scheme 1). The known 5-silylated 1-methoxy-2-deoxyribofuranose 6, prepared in two-steps from 2-deoxy-d-ribose 5 [19,20,21], was easily oxidized using Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP) to provide protected 3-ketoribofuranose 7 as a stable compound in excellent yield. However, when 7 was reacted under a range of standard chlorination conditions including PCl5/PCl3 [22], Appel reaction [23,24], and the N-chlorosuccinimide/chlorodiphenylphosphine system [25], gem-dichloro sugar 8 could not be formed. Interestingly, the desired product could be obtained when the reaction was conducted in the presence of PCl5 at low temperature (−78 °C). Compound 8 was purified by column chromatography using neutralized silica gel, nonetheless it underwent extensive degradation and could only be isolated in a disappointing 13% yield. This is presumably due to its proclivity towards aromatization following elimination of a molecule of methanol and HCl under acid or basic conditions. In addition, the chlorinated sugar could not be converted to its acetylated derivative, while suffering further decomposition under Vorbrüggen glycosylation conditions.
Due to the chemical instability of 3,3-dichloro-2,3-dideoxyribofuranose 8, this route was thus discontinued in favor of an alternative synthetic approach directly starting from 2′-deoxy-ribonucleosides. As shown in Scheme 2, 2′-deoxythymidine 9 was regioselectively silylated at the 5′-position using tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBSCl) and the remaining hydroxyl functionality was then oxidized to give compound 10 in good yield. In agreement with the aforementioned results, when a variety of chlorinating conditions were screened, only the use of PCl5 at low temperature (−78 °C) enabled the formation of 3′,3′-gem-dichloro thymidine derivative 12. However, while the gem-dichlorination was found to be possible, it was observed that under the employed conditions only a modest yield (22%) of the desired compound was obtained. The starting 3′-ketonucleoside 10 was in fact mainly converted to compounds 14 and 15 resulting from perchlorination reactions, which occurred after in situ deprotection of the 5′-TBS group. A small amount (8%) of an additional side product, i.e., 3′-chloro-vinyl derivative 13, was also isolated owing to the 2′,3′-elimination of HCl from 12. In order to improve the observed chemoselectivity, it was reasoned that the replacement of the protecting group at the 5′-position with a relatively less reactive moiety could suppress the perchlorination pathways. 5′-TBDPS-3′-ketonucleoside 11 was therefore synthesized, which led to an improved yield of the corresponding thymidine gem-dichloride 16 (30%) when subjected to the chlorination conditions. Although an exclusive 3′-dichlorination was ultimately not realized, compound 16 could be easily separated by column chromatography from the monochlorinated derivative 17 (ratio 16:17 was approximately 1:1). Both compounds were readily deprotected with tetra-n-butylammonium fluoride (TBAF) at −50 °C to afford the corresponding nucleosides 3a and 18 in good yields. TBAF was added at low temperature in order to avoid fast decomposition of the starting material, which was observed when the addition was performed either at room temperature or 0 °C.
In a similar fashion, 3′-keto-2′-deoxyribonucleoside derivative 19 bearing uracil as nucleobase was synthetized in two steps from 2′-deoxyuridine (see Materials and Methods). After the chlorination step, a 1.2:1 mixture of di- (20) and monochlorinated (21) derivatives was formed, which were isolated by subsequent chromatrographic purification and additionally submitted to pyrimidine base interconversion under standard conditions (Scheme 3). However, when the transformation into of the corresponding triazolyl intermediates (for example compound 22) was conducted at room temperature, only poor product yields were observed due to the formation of side products originating from the nucleobase elimination. Pleasingly, it was found that by premixing 20 (and analogously 21) with POCl3 in dry acetonitrile at low temperature (−50 °C) prior to the slow addition of triethylamine, followed by an acetonitrile solution containing 1,2,4-triazole and triethylamine, no degradation was observed. After desilylation and substitution at the 4-position, gem-dichloro compound 3b was obtained in good yield (72%) over two steps, while compound 23 was also synthesized in 3 steps from 21 with an overall yield of 54%.
Next, the previously synthesized triazolyl derivative 22 was subjected to a transglycosylation reaction [26], as depicted in Scheme 4. Thus, compound 22 was reacted with silylated 6-chloropurine in the presence of trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanosulfonate as catalyst to afford nucleoside 24 as an anomeric mixture, which could be separated by column chromatography to afford 57% and 43% of the α and β anomer, respectively. The β anomer was then reacted with TBAF to accomplish the removal of the TBDPS group, followed by displacement of the chlorine atom with NH3 in MeOH. The desired 3′,3′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine derivative 3c was obtained in poor yield (14%), together with side products 25 and 26.
In order to access the corresponding structural nucleoside analogues bearing a gem-dichloro moiety at the 2′-position (4, Figure 1), we envisioned an analogous sequence of reactions. In this case, the synthesis plan involved the initial preparation of a suitably protected 3-deoxyribofuranose synthon (Scheme 5). Thus, 1,2-O-isopropylidene-d-xylofuranose was obtained from d-(+)-xylose over two steps in one pot and multigram scale according to a previously reported procedure [27], and further protected at the 5-position to afford 5-O-o-toluoyl-1,2-isopropylidene-d-xylofuranose 27. Subsequently, this compound was transformed into its 3-thiocarbonylimidazole derivative and subjected to Barton-McCombie deoxygenation conditions to give a 3-deoxyribofuranose intermediate, which was diacetylated using a mixture of acetic anhydride and acetic acid in the presence of a catalytic amount of sulfuric acid to furnish glycosyl donor 28 in 51% yield over 3 steps. Alternatively, TFA could also be used as catalyst to provide acetylated 3′-deoxyribofuranose 28 in higher yield (90%), but a longer reaction time was required. The ortho-toluoyl protecting group at the 5-position was preferred over the previously employed TBDPS functionality after that initial attempts to introduce the thiocarbonyldimidazole at the sterically hindered 3-position in the presence of such silyl group were unsuccessful.
3-Deoxyribofuranose 28 was reacted with thymine, N4-benzoylcytosine, and 6-chloropurine under Vorbrüggen glycosylation conditions to provide the corresponding 5′-O-o-toluoyl-2′-O-acetyl-3′-deoxynucleosides 29ac. Upon coupling with thymine, the corresponding β-anomeric nucleoside analogue 29a was exclusively formed in quantitative yield. However, in the case of N4-benzoyl-cytosine and 6-chloropurine, 10% of the α-anomer (α:β ratio of 1:9) and 7% of the N7-alkylated regioisomer were also formed, together with other side products that were not isolated (˂5%), respectively, leading to relatively lower yields of compounds 29b and 29c. The assignment of the β-glycosidic bond of the 3′-deoxynucleoside analogues was carried out by 2D-NOESY experiments. The presence of a significant NOE effect between H-4′ and H-1′, and the absence of any NOE interaction between H-1′ and H-5′ at the level of the sugar moiety corroborated the stereoselectivity of the reaction for purine and pyrimidine nucleobases. In addition, the coupling constants for the anomeric protons of the synthesized 3′-deoxynucleosides were found to be in agreement with previous reports [28,29]. After standard protecting group manipulation, compounds 29a (B = T) and 29b (B = CBz) were converted to 5′-TBDPS-3′-deoxynucleosides 30a and 30b. 6-Chloropurine 3′-deoxynucleoside 29c could either undergo displacement of the chlorine atom by a methoxide functionality or be transformed into the corresponding adenine containing derivative, depending on the reaction conditions, to afford after further silylation compounds 30c and 30d, respectively. Silylated 3′-deoxynucleoside derivatives 30a (B = T) and 30c (B = 6-OMe-purine) were then oxidized using DMP in dry DCM at 0 °C to give the desired 5′-O-TBDPS-2′-ketonucleosides 33a and 33b in quantitative yield, which could be easily purified by column chromatography.
In order to obtain the corresponding cytosine- and adenine-containing nucleoside derivatives, compounds 30b (B = C) and 30d (B = A) were fully protected at the 2′-OH and exocyclic amino group using o-toluoyl chloride in the presence of pyridine. The resulting compounds 31a and 31b were then reacted with one equivalent of potassium tert-butoxide at −78 °C in dry THF. In the case of the cytosine derivative, regioselective deprotection at the 2′-position led to the desired nucleoside intermediate, which was readily oxidized to the corresponding ketone 33c. In contrast, under similar conditions, adenine derivative 31b underwent complete detoluylation reverting to 5′-O-TBDPS-3′-deoxyadenosine 30d. However, we found that the desired transformation could be efficiently achieved after replacement of the 5′-TBDPS with a 5′-o-Tol group. Thus, compound 29c was transformed into 3′-deoxyadenosine (3′-dA), toluoylated to 32, which subsequently could be selectively deprotected at the 2′-position and further oxidized to give the desired 5′-O-o-toluolyl-2′-keto-6-N-o-toluoyl adenine containing nucleoside 33d in 55% yield over two steps.
Subsequently, all suitably protected 2′-keto nucleosides 33ad were subjected to the chlorination reaction in the presence of PCl5 to furnish thymine and 6-OMe-purine containing 2′,2′-gem-dichloro nucleosides 4a and 4b as well as protected nucleosides 34 and 35, which upon final removal of the toluoyl moieties with ethanolic ammonia provided the desired 2′,2′-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine and adenosine derivatives 4c and 4d (Scheme 6). Although this transformation could also suffer from a concomitant elimination reaction, we did not notice any side product formation with the exception of the thymine derivative. In this case, 5′-O-TBDPS-2′-chloro-2′,3′-vinyl-2′,3′-dideoxythymidine derivative (19%) was readily isolated from the reaction mixture after column chromatography and characterized.
The confirmation of the structure of all intermediates and final compounds was carried out by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic analysis. Furthermore, mass spectroscopy in positive mode further proved the structure of the chlorinated nucleosides. The presence of chlorine atoms in the target compounds was confirmed by the intensity ratios of the isotopes of the protonated molecular ions (see Supplementary Materials). In the case of the dichloride derivatives, the molecular ions consisted of three peaks spaced by two mass units, while for monochlorinated nucleoside derivatives two peaks were observed. AQS for biological activity, unfortunately, none of the synthesized chlorinated nucleoside analogues showed any activity against HIV-1 and HIV-2 in MT-4 cell cultures.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

All reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources and used as obtained. Moisture sensitive reactions were carried out in oven-dried glassware under a nitrogen or argon atmosphere unless otherwise stated. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on an Avance 300, 500, or 600 MHz spectrometer (Bruker BioSpin, Billerica, MA, USA) using tetramethylsilane as internal standard or referenced to the residual solvent signal. Chemical shifts (δ) are expressed in parts per million (ppm), while coupling constants in Hz (Hertz). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were acquired on a quadruple orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Synapt G2 HDMS, Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Samples were infused at 3 μL/min, and spectra were obtained in positive (or in negative) ionization mode with a resolution of 15,000 (FWHM) using leucine enkephalin as lock mass. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on silica gel Alugram (aluminum foil) pre-coated sheets (254 nm, Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany). Products were purified by column chromatography on silica gel (60 Å, 0.035−0.070 mm, Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium). Preparative RP-HPLC purification was performed on a Gemini 110A column (C18, 10 μm, 21.2 mm × 250 mm, Phenomenex, Utrecht, Belgium) using H2O/CH3CN as eluent gradient. Purities of all the tested compounds were verified to be >95% by HPLC analysis.

3.2. General Oxidation Procedure

A stirred solution of 2′- or 3′-deoxynucleoside (1.0 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL/mmol) was cooled in an ice bath, and then Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP) (1.0 equiv.) was added under an inert atmosphere. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (50 mL/mmol) and washed successively with saturated aq. NaHCO3, water, and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue, which was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the title compound.

3.3. General Chlorination Procedure

To a stirred solution of 3′- or 2′-ketonucleoside (1 equiv.) in dry CH2Cl2 (20.0 mL/mmol) at −78 °C was added PCl5 (3.8 equiv.) under an inert atmosphere. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to −50 °C and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (200.0 mL/mmol) and quenched with a K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH = 7, 200.0 mL/mmol). Subsequently, the organic layer was separated and washed with cold water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give a crude residue that was purified by column chromatography to afford the title compound.

3.4. General Desilylation Procedure

To a stirred solution of 5′-O-TBDPS chlorinated nucleoside (1 equiv.) in dry THF at −50 °C was added a 1M TBAF solution in THF (1.5 equiv.). The reaction mixture was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature over 2 h. After completion of the reaction, the mixture was diluted with EtOAc and washed with water. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give a crude residue that was purified by column chromatography to afford the title compound.

3.5. General Procedure for Sugar-Base Condensation

To a solution of nucleobase (1 equiv.) in dry CH3CN, was added N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (2.5 equiv.) and the resulting mixture was stirred for 20 min at room temperature. A solution of 28 (0.8 equiv.) in dry CH3CN was then added and the reaction mixture was cooled to −20 °C. Next, trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf) (1.05 equiv.) was added dropwise and the mixture was allowed to slowly warm to room temperature over 1 h, heated to 70 °C, and further stirred for 1 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc and washed with saturated aq. NaHCO3, water, and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue, which was purified by silica gel column chromatography to afford the tile compound.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-keto-2′-deoxythymidine (11). To a solution of 2′-deoxythymidine 9 (1.15 g, 4.78 mmol) and imidazole (0.650 g, 9.56 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (50 mL) was added tert-butyldiphenylsilyl chloride(TBDPSCl) (1.38 g, 5.00 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (200 mL) and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-deoxythymidine in quantitative yield (2.28 g). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.95 (s, 1H, NH), 7.68–7.66 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.54 (d, 1H, J = 1.1 Hz, H-6), 7.41–7.34 (m, 6H, ArH), 6.48 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 5.7 Hz, H-1′), 4.61 (br s, 1H, OH), 4.27–4.26 (m, 1H, H-3′), 4.10–4.08 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.00 (dd, 1H, J = 11.4, 2.2 Hz, H-5′), 3.88 (dd, 1H, J = 11.4, 2.2 Hz, H-5″), 2.49–2.47 (m, 1H, H-2′), 2.21–2.19 (m, 1H, H-2″), 1.58 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.09 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 164.2 (C=O), 150.6 (C=O), 135.3 (ArC), 135.2 (ArC), 135.0 (6-C), 132.8 (ArC), 132.1 (ArC), 129.8 (ArC), 129.7 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.6 (ArC), 110.8 (5-C), 87.1 (1′-CH), 84.5 (4′-CH), 71.3 (3′-CH), 64.0 (5′-CH2), 40.7 (2′-CH2), 31.3 (-C(CH3)3), 26.7 (3 × CH3), 11.8 (5-CH3). Following the general oxidation procedure, 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-deoxythymidine (1.54 g, 3.00 mmol) was reacted with DMP (1.70 g, 4.00 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (100 mL). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was then recrystallized from CHCl3 to provide 11 as a white solid (1.14 g, 80%, over two steps), which was used in the next step without any further purification. HRMS: C26H30N2O5 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 501.1816, found: 501.1886.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′,3′-gem-dichloro-3′-deoxythymidine (16) and 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-3′-deoxythymidine (17). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 11 (0.500 g, 1.04 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.822 g, 3.95 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane: EtOAc 4:1) to give 16 (0.165 g, 30%) and 17 (0.180 g, 35%) as pale yellow solids. Data for 16: 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.3 (s, 1H, NH), 7.68–7.66 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.54 (d, 1H, J = 1.1 Hz, H-6), 7.41–7.35 (m, 6H, ArH), 6.48 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 5.7 Hz, H-1′), 4.10 (dd, 1H, J = 4.7, 2.2 Hz, H-4′), 3.99 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 2.2 Hz, H-5′), 3.88 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 4.7 Hz, H-5″), 3.79 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 5.7 Hz, H-2′), 3.35 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 8.2 Hz, H-2″), 1.54 (s, 3H, 5-CH3), 0.97 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7 (C=O), 150.2 (C=O), 135.4 (6-C), 135.4 (ArC), 135.3 (ArC), 135.3 (ArC), 135.1 (ArC), 129.7 (ArC), 129.6 (ArC), 127.6 (ArC), 127.5 (ArC), 110.8 (5-C), 87.5 (4′-CH), 85.0 (3′-C(Cl)2), 84.5 (1′-CH), 63.7 (5′-CH2), 41.0 (2′-CH2), 26.6 (3 × CH3), 19.0 (C(CH3)), 11.6 (5-CH3); HRMS: C26H30N2O4SiCl2 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 533.1424, found: 533.1442. Data for 17: 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.00 (s, 1H, NH), 7.67 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, ArH), 7.62 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz, ArH), 7.43–7.25 (m, 7H, ArH, H-6), 7.02 (dd, 1H, J = 4.0, 1.3 Hz, H-1′), 5.93 (t, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz, H-2′), 4.78–4.77 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.09–4.08 (m, 2H, H-5′, H-5″), 1.17 (s, 3H, 5-CH3), 1.09 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7 (C=O), 150.7 (C=O), 136.3 (6-C), (3′-C(Cl)), 135.3 (ArC), 135.2 (ArC), 133.5 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 129.9 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 121.2 (2′-CH), 111.6 (5-C), 87.5 (4′-CH), 86.5 (1′-CH), 62.1 (5′-CH2), 27.1 (3 × CH3), 19.6 (C(CH3)), 11.3 (5-CH3); HRMS: C26H29N2O4SiCl [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 519.14775, found: 519.1468.
3′,3′-gem-Dichloro-3′-deoxythymidine (3a). Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of compound 16 (0.143 g, 0.27 mmol) in dry THF (2.0 mL) was reacted with TBAF (1 mL, 2 mmol) at −50 °C. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give 3a as a yellow solid (76 mg, 89%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 11.4 (s, 1H, NH), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz, H-6), 6.27 (dd, 1H, J = 7.0, 6.3 Hz, H-1′), 5.34 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H, OH), 4.38 (dd, 1H, J = 5.1, 3.1 Hz, 4′-H), 3.82 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.1, 3.1 Hz, H-5′), 3.78 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.0, 3.1 Hz, H-5″), 3.21 (dd, J = 14.7, 6.3 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 3.03 (dd, J = 14.6, 7.0 Hz, 1H, H-2″), 1.78 (d, 3H, J = 1.2 Hz, 5-CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO): δ 163.7 (C=O), 150.5 (C=O), 135.6 (6-C), 109.8 (5-C), 89.0 (4′-CH), 86.9 (3′-C(Cl)2), 81.8 (1′-CH), 60.7 (5′-CH2), 50.4 (2′-CH2), 12.4 (5-CH3); HRMS: C10H12Cl2N2O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 317.0066, found: 317.0074.
3′-Chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-3′-deoxythymidine (18). Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of compound 17 (0.124 g, 0.25 mmol) in dry THF (2.0 mL) was reacted with TBAF (1 mL, 2 mmol) at −50 °C. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give 18 (62.6 mg, 88%) as a yellow solid. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.87 (s, 1H, NH), 7.72 (d, 1H, J = 1.4 Hz, H-6), 7.01 (dd, 1H, J = 4.7, 1.7 Hz, H-1′), 5.96 (t, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, H-2′), 5.30 (s, 1H, OH), 5.00–4.99 (m, 1H, 4′-H), 3.93 (dd, 1H, J = 15.5, 3.0 Hz, H-5′), 3.89 (dd, 1H, J = 15.5, 3.0 Hz, H-5″), 1.91 (d, 3H, J = 1.4 Hz, CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.5 (C=O), 150.7 (C=O), 135.9 (3′-C(Cl)), 135.7 (6-C), 122.9 (2′-C), 111.9 (5-C), 87.5 (4′-CH), 84.1 (1′-CH), 44.1 (5′-CH2), 12.4 (5-CH3); HRMS: C10H11Cl1N2O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 259.0480, found: 259.0489.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-keto-2′-deoxyuridine (19). To a solution of uridine (1.09 g, 4.78 mmol) and imidazole (0.650 g, 9.56 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (50 mL) was added TBDPSCl (1.38 g, 5.00 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (200 mL) and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl) uridine in quantitative yield (2.21 g). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.1 (s, 1H, NH), 7.83 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-6), 7.66–7.63 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.42–7.37 (m, 6H, ArH), 6.37 (t, 1H, J = 6.4 Hz, H-1′), 5.43 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, H-5), 4.56 (br s, 1H, OH), 4.11–4.10 (m, 1H, H-3′), 4.03–4.02 (m, 1H, H-4′), 3.98 (dd, 1H, J = 11.4, 2.3 Hz, H-5′), 3.85 (dd, 1H, J = 11.4, 2.9 Hz, H-5″), 2.49–2.44 (m, 1H, H-2′), 2.24–2.18 (m, 1H, H-2″), 1.07 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7 (C=O), 150.4 (C=O), 140.0 (6-C), 135.4 (ArC), 135.1 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 132.1 (ArC), 129.8 (ArC), 129.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 102.0 (5-C), 87.0 (1′-CH), 84.8 (4′-CH), 70.8 (3′-CH), 63.6 (5′-CH2), 41.0 (2′-CH2), 31.3 (-C(CH3)3), 26.7 (3 × CH3); HRMS for C25H30N2O4Si1 [M + Na]+ Calc.: 489.1816, found: 489.1816. Following the general oxidation procedure, 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl) uridine (1.39 g, 3.00 mmol) was reacted with DMP (1.70 g, 4.00 mmol) in CHCl3 (100 mL). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was recrystallized from CHCl3 to provide 19 as a white solid (1.23 g, 87% over two steps), which was used in the next step without any further purification. HRMS: C25H28N2O5 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 487.1659 found: 487.1686.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′,3′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxyuridine (20) and 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenyl-silyl)-3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxyuridine (21). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 19 (0.482 g, 1.04 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.822 g, 3.95 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 4:1) to give 20 (0.227 g, 44%) and 21 (0.175 g, 35%) as yellow pale solids. Data for 20: 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.57 (s, 1H, NH), 7.70–7.66 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.56 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz, H-6), 7.47–7.38 (m, 6H, ArH), 6.23 (dd, 1H, J = 6.8, 4.9 Hz, H-1′), 5.51 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz, H-5), 4.43 (dd, 1H, J = 5.1, 3.0 Hz, H-4′), 4.15 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 3.0 Hz, H-5′), 4.03 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 5.2 Hz, H-5″), 3.23 (dd, 1H, J = 14.8, 6.9 Hz, H-2′), 2.96 (dd, 1H, J = 14.8, 4.8 Hz, H-2″), 1.08 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.2 (C=O), 150.2 (C=O), 139.4 (6-C), 135.7 (ArC), 135.4 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.2 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 102.1 (5-C), 89.9 (4′-CH), 84.5 (3′-C(Cl)2), 83.3 (1′-CH), 63.1 (5′-CH2), 52.7 (2′-CH2), 29.6 (-C(CH3)3), 26.8 (3 × CH3); HRMS: C25H28Cl2N2O4Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 519.1268, found: 519.1290. Data for 21: 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.44 (s, 1H, NH), 7.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz, 6-H), 7.66–7.64 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.57–7.55 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.44–7.35 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.03 (dd, 1H, J = 3.8, 1.5 Hz, H-1′), 5.9 (t, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, H-2′), 4.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz, 5-H), 4.80 (dddd, 1H, J = 3.8, 2.7, 1.5, 1.3 Hz, H-4′), 4.07 (dd, 1H, J = 12.3, 1.3 Hz, H-5′), 4.07 (dd, 1H, J = 12.3, 2.7 Hz, H-5″), 1.10 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.9 (C=O), 149.7 (C=O), 136.9 (6-C), 136.5 (3′-C(Cl)), 136.5 (ArC), 135.5 (ArC), 135.2 (ArC), 132.9 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 129.9 (ArC), 127.8 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 121.7 (2′-CH), 109.9 (5-C), 88.3 (4′-CH), 86.9 (1′-CH), 62.9 (5′-CH2), 29.6 (C(CH3), 27.1 (3 × -CH3); HRMS: C25H27ClN2O4Si [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 505.1321, found: 505.1321.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′,3′-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine (22). To a stirred solution of 20 (1.04 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was added POCl3 (0.28 mL, 3 mmol) at −50 °C. Triethylamine (0.7 mL, 5.00 mmol) was then added dropwise over 10 min, followed by a solution of 1,2,4-triazole (0.414 g, 6.00 mmol) and triethylamine (0.8 mL, 6.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (15 mL) over 30 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for two days. It was then diluted with EtOAc (200.0 mL) and quenched with a NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer (pH = 7, 150.0 mL). The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue, which was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:hexane 7:3) to afford compound 22 as a white solid (0. 967 mg, 85%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.19 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 8.06 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6), 7.68–7.62 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.43–7.42 (m, 6H, ArH), 6.81 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-5), 6.10 (dd, 1H, J = 7.3, 3.0 Hz, H-1′), 4.49 (dd, 1H, J = 6.0, 3.0 Hz, H-4′), 4.19 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 3.0 Hz, H-5′), 4.01 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 6.0 Hz, H-5″), 3.38 (dd, 1H, J = 15.3, 7.3 Hz, H-2′), 3.05 (dd, 1H, J = 15.3, 3.0 Hz, H-2″), 1.03 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.8 (C=O), 154.4 (4-CN), 146.6 (N-CH=N), 143.6 (N-CH=N), 136.1 (6-C), 136.0 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 132.9 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 130.4 (ArC), 130.3 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 128.1 (ArC), 94.4 (5-C), 90.9 (4′-CH), 86.4 (1′-CH), 84.3 (3′-C(Cl)2), 63.2 (5′-CH2), 53.3 (2′-CH2), 30.0 (C(CH3)3), 27.1 (3 × CH3); HRMS: C27H29Cl2N5O3Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 570.1489, found: 570.1489.
3′,3′-gem-Dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (3b). Following the general desilylation procedure, 22 (0.142 g, 0.25 mmol) was reacted with a solution of TBAF in THF (0.4 mL, 0.375 mmol) in dry THF (2.0 mL). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give 3′,3′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine as a yellow solid (66 mg, 80%). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 9.44 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 8.61 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6), 8.41 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 7.03 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-5), 6.15 (dd, 1H, J = 7.4, 3.6 Hz, H-1′), 5.35 (s, 1H, OH), 4.56 (dd, 1H, J = 5.9, 3.1 Hz, H-4′), 3.91 (dd, 1H, J = 12.3, 3.1 Hz, H-5′), 3.88 (dd, 1H, J = 12.3, 5.8 Hz, H-5″), 3.50 (dd, J = 14.9, 7.4 Hz, 1H, H-2′), 3.06 (dd, J = 14.9, 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-2″); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 159.9 (2-C=O), 154.2 (4-CN), 153.5 (N-CH=N), 148.1 (N-CH=N), 143.8 (6-C), 140.1 (5-C), 93.8 (4′-CH), 90.0 (1′-CH), 85.9 (3′-C(Cl)2), 60.3 (5′-CH2), 51.7 (2′-CH2); HRMS: C11H11Cl2N5O3 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 354.0131, found: 354.0132. To a stirred solution of the above compound (0.100 g, 0.30 mmol,) in EtOH (3 mL) at −20 °C was added a solution of NH3 in EtOH, and then the reaction was allowed to warm to room temperature. After stirring for 4 h, the volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:EtOH 75:25) to give 3b as a pale green solid (0.753 g, 90%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.78 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 7.34 (s, 1H, NH2), 7.19 (s, 1H, NH2), 6.19 (dd, 1H, J = 7.1, 5.2 Hz, H-1′), 5.78 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 5.32 (t, 1H, J = 5.3 Hz, OH), 4.37 (dd, 1H, J = 5.0, 3.0 Hz, H-4′), 3.83 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.3, 3.0 Hz, H-5′), 3.77 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.3, 5.0 Hz, H-5″), 3.25 (dd, 1H, J = 14.7, 7.2 Hz, H-2′), 2.87 (dd, 1H, J = 14.6, 5.2 Hz, H-2″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 165.7 (4-C-NH2), 154.9 (2-C=O), 140.65 (6-C), 94.2 (5-C), 89.1 (4′-C), 86.80 (3′-C(Cl)2), 83.1 (1′-CH), 60.6 (5′-CH2), 51.6 (2′-CH2); HRMS: C9H10Cl1N3O3 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 280.0250, found: 280.0250.
3′-Chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (23). To a stirred solution of 21 (0.95 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was added POCl3 (0.28 mL, 3 mmol) at −50 °C. Triethylamine (0.7 mL, 5.00 mmol) was then added dropwise over 10 min, followed by a solution of 1,2,4-triazole (0.414 g, 6.00 mmol) and triethylamine (0.8 mL, 6.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN over 30 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for two days. It was then diluted with ethyl acetate (200 mL) and quenched with a NaH2PO4/Na2HPO4 buffer (pH = 7, 150.0 mL). The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried over Na2SO4, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue, which was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:hexane 7:3) to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine as a white solid (0.884 mg, 80%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.24 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 8.55 (d, 1H, J = 7.25 Hz, H-6), 8.07 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 8.07–7.08 (m, 10H, ArH), 7.09 (dd, 1H, J = 3.3, 1.5 Hz, H-1′), 6.28 (d, 1H, J = 7.25 Hz, H-5), 6.16 (t, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, H-2′), 4.89–4.87 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.13 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 1.6 Hz, H-5′), 4.11 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 2.0 Hz, H-5″), 1.11 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.0 (C=O), 147.8 (4-CN), 147.6 (N-CH=N), (6-C) 143.2, 141.8 (N-CH=N), 136.3 (3′-C(Cl)), 135.5 (ArC), 135.0 (ArC), 130.5 (ArC), 130.4 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 123.0 (2′-C), 94.9 (5-C), 90.3 (4′-CH), 87.5 (1′-CH), 62.5 (5′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.3 (3 × CH3); HRMS: C27H28ClN5O3Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 534.1722, found: 534.1718. Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine (0.53 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry THF (2.00 mL) was reacted with TBAF (1.5 mL, 1.5 mmol) at −50 °C. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give 3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine as a white solid (0.221 mg, 75%). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, MeOD): δ 9.38 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 8.87 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-6), 8.24 (s, 1H, N-CH=N), 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5), 7.02 (dd, 1H, J = 2.5, 1.5 Hz, H-1′), 6.19 (t, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, H-2′), 4.89 (br s, 1H, H-4′), 3.89 (dq, 2H, J = 12.8, 1.5 Hz, H-5′, H-5″); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO): δ 161.1 (4-C=N), 157.1 (2-C=O), 154.8 (N-CH=N), 150.5 (N-CH=N), 144.7 (6-C), 137.7 (3′-C(Cl)), 123.3 (2′-CH) 96.0 (5-C), 92.0 (4′-CH), 89.3 (1′-CH), 62.9 (5′-CH2); HRMS: C11H10ClN5O3 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 296.0544, found: 296.0542. To a stirred solution of 3′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxy-4-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)uridine (0.295 g 0.01 mmol,) in EtOH (3.00 mL) at −20 °C was added a solution of NH3 in EtOH. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. After removal of all the volatiles in vacuo, the crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:EtOH 75:25) to give 23 as a pale green solid (0.194 g, 80%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.12 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 7.01 (dd, 1H, J = 3.3, 1.5 Hz, H-1′), 6.06 (t, 1H, J = 1.5, H-2′), 5.93 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 4.87–4.77 (m, 1H, H-4′), 3.86 (dq, 2H, J = 12.8, 2.0 Hz, H-5′, H-5″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 166.7 (4-C), 157.1 (C=O), 144.2 (6-C), 137.1 (3′-CCl), 123.7 (2′-C), 96.0 (5-C), 90.2 (1′-C), 88.4 (4′-CH), 61.2 (5′-CH2); HRMS: C9H10Cl1N3O3 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 266.0303, found: 266.0308.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′,3′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-6-chloropurine (24). To a stirred solution of 6-chloropurine (0.616 g, 4.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL), N,O-bistrimethylsilylacetamide (1.09 mL, 4.50 mmol) was added, and then the reaction mixture was heated at 78 °C for 1 h. After cooling to room temperature, a solution of compound 22 (0.569 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (15 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was then cooled to −20 °C and TMSOTf (0.92 mL, 5.00 mmol) was added. The mixture was allowed to slowly warm to 20 °C and it was then heated at 78 °C and stirred for 5 h. It was then diluted with ethyl acetate and washed with saturated aq. NaHCO3 (50 mL), water (50 mL), and brine (50 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 8.5:1.5 to 7:3) to give 24 as an anomeric mixture (0.448 g, 80%). This mixture was further purified by column chromatography to give 57% of 24a-anomer) and 43% of 24b-anomer). The unreacted excess of 6-chloropurine was recovered. Data for 24b: 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.71 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.28 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.69–7.26 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.54 (dd, 1H, J = 6.3, 5.3 Hz, H-1′), 4.55 (dd, 1H, J = 5.5, 3.4 Hz, H-4′), 4.20 (dd, 1H, J = 11.7, 3.3 Hz, H-5′), 4.09 (dd, 1H, J = 11.7, 5.5 Hz, H-5″), 3.44–3.42 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-2″), 1.06 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.4 (6-C), 151.8 (2-C), 151.3 (4-C), 144.0 (5-C), 135.9 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 132.9 (ArC), 130.2 (8-C), 128.0 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 90.1 (4′-CH), 85.5 (3′-C(Cl2)), 84.4 (1′-CH), 63.5 (5′-CH2), 52.3 (2′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.0 (3 × CH3); HRMS: C26H27Cl3N4O2Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 561.1041, found: 561.1046.
3′,3′-gem-Dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine (3c). Following the general desilylation procedure, 24b (0.028 g, 0.05 mmol) was reacted with a solution of TBAF in THF (0.5 mL, 0.5 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL). After work-up, the resulting crude material was dissolved in dry MeOH (5 mL) and cooled to −20 °C. A saturated solution of NH3 in H2O (10 mL, 25%) was then added; the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred overnight. After removal of all the volatiles in vacuo, the crude residue was purified by column chromatography (MeOH:EtOAc 0:10 to 2.5:7.5) to give 3c as a pale yellow solid (4 mg, 14%). Compounds 25 and 26 were also isolated as an oil (11%) and white solid (15%), respectively. Data for 3c: 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.33 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.16 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.38 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.47 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, H-1′), 5.48 (t, 1H, J = 5.3 Hz, OH), 4.46 (dd, 1H, J = 5.0, 3.3 Hz, H-4′), 3.83 (ddd, 1H, J = 10.4, 5.0, 3.3 Hz, H-5′), 3.79 (ddd, 1H, J = 10.4, 5.3, 5.0 Hz, H-5″), 3.65 (dd, 1H, J = 14.6, 6.8 Hz, H-2′), 3.42 (dd, 1H, J = 14.6, 6.8 Hz, H-2″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 156.2 (6-C), 152.8 (2-C), 149.2 (4-C), 139.1 (8-C), 118.9 (5-CH), 89.7 (4′-CH), 87.0 (3′-C(Cl2)), 81.2 (1′-CH), 61.2 (5′-CH2), 49.9 (2′-CH2); HRMS: C10H11Cl2N5O2 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 304.0362, found: 304.0357. Data for 25: 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.56 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.55 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.57 (dd, 1H, J = 7.1, 6.2 Hz, H-1′), 5.32 (t, 1H, J = 4.9 Hz, OH), 4.48 (dd, 1H, J = 5.3, 3.4 Hz, 1H, H-4′), 3.84 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.2, 5.0, 3.4 Hz, H-5′), 3.80 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.2, 5.3, 5.0 Hz, H-5″), 3.66 (dd, 1H, J = 14.6, 6.2 Hz, H-2′), 3.48 (dd, 1H, J = 14.6, 7.1 Hz, H-2″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 160.1 (6-C), 152.0 (2-C), 151.8 (4-C), 141.7 (8-C), 120.9 (5-CH), 89.7 (1′-CH), 86.7 (3′-C(Cl2)), 81.4 (4′-CH), 60.9 (5′-CH2), 50.0 (2′-CH2). Data for 26: 1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.23 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.15 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.29 (s, 2H, NH2), 6.96 (dd, 1H, J = 5.1, 1.6 Hz, H-1′), 6.37 (t, 1H, J = 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 5.06–5.03 (m, 1H, H-4′), 3.71 (dd, 1H, J = 12.7, 1.9 Hz, H-5″), 3.59 (dd, 1H, J = 12.7, 3.0 Hz, H-5′); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 156.1 (6-C), 152.9 (2-C), 149.2 (4-C), 139.1 (8-C), 134.8 (3′-C), 122.0 (2′-CH), 119.0 (5-CH), 87.1 (1′-CH), 87.0 (4′-CH), 60.4 (5′-CH2); HRMS: C10H10ClN5O2 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 268.0595, found: 268.0587.
5-O-(o-Toluoyl)-1,2-isopropylidene-α-d-xylofuranose (27). d-xylose (10.0 g, 0.067 mol) was dissolved in acetone (260 mL) containing H2SO4 (0.66 M, 10.0 mL) and the solution was stirred for 30 min. A solution of Na2CO3 (13.0 g, 0.123 mol) in water (112 mL) was carefully added to the above cooled mixture, which was then stirred for further 2.5 h at 20 °C. Then, solid Na2CO3 (7.00 g, 0.066 mol) was added, Na2SO4 (22.3 g) was filtered off and washed with acetone, and the filtrate was evaporated in vacuo to afford a crude residue (14 g). This residue was resolubilized in a 9:1 mixture of EtOAc (270 mL) and methanol (30 mL), filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a yellow oil (12 g, 96%). This residue was dissolved in dry DMF (150 mL) under an inert atmosphere, cooled in an ice bath, and then o-toluoyl chloride (9.85 g, 8.31 mL, 0.064 mol) was added, followed by imidazole (4.35 g, 0.064 mol). The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 5 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (300 mL) and washed with water (300 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue, which was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 27 (16.5 g, 84%) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.92 (dd, 1H, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, ArH), 7.41–7.20 (m, 3H, ArH), 5.97 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H, H-1′), 4.69 (dd, 1H, J = 13.4, 8.4 Hz, H-5′), 4.57 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, H-2′), 4.43 (dd, 1H, J = 13.4, 6.0 Hz, H-5″), 4.42 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.4, 6.0, 2.1 Hz, H-4′), 4.24 (d, 1H, J = 2.1, H-3′), 3.73 (s, 1H, OH), 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.49 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.30 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.2 (CO), 140.7 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.0 (ArC), 131.1 (ArC), 129.0 (ArC), 126.0 (ArC), 112.0 (OCO) 105.1 (1′-C), 85.4 (4′-C), 78.8 (3′-CH), 74.8 (2′-CH), 62.0 (5′-CH2), 27.0 (CH3), 26.4 (CH3), 22.0 (CH3); HRMS for C16H20O6 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 331.1152, found: 331.1156.
5-O-(o-Toluoyl)-1,2-diacetyl-3-deoxyxylofuranose (28). Compound 27 (1.00 g, 3.10 mmol) and N,N-thiocarbonyldiimidazole (0.55 g, 3.10 mmol) were dissolved in dry DMF (20 mL) and then imidazole (0.034 g, 0.50 mmol) was added under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight, and it was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (500 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue which was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford 5-O-(o-toluoyl)-3-O-imidazolylthiocarbonyl-1,2-isopropylidene-d-xylofuranose (1.10 g, 89%) as a pale yellow oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.32 (s, 1H, NCH) 7.88–7.01 (m, 6H, ArH, NCH), 6.06 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz, H-1′), 5.99 (d, 1H, J = 2.9, H-3′), 4.81–4.76 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.78 (d, 1H, J = 3.9 Hz, H-2′), 4.59–4.56 (m, 2H, H-5′, H-5″), 2.53 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 1.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.35 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 182.2 (CS), 168.8 (CO), 140.7 (C=N), 137.2 (C=N), 132.6 (ArC), 131.9 (ArC), 131.5 (ArC), 130.9 (ArC), 126.0 (ArC), 117.9 (ArC), 112.9 (OCO), 105.1 (1′-C), 84.5 (4′-C), 83.0 (3′-CH), 76.9 (2′-CH), 61.1 (5′-CH2), 26.8 (CH3), 26.4 (CH3), 21.9 (CH3). 5-O-(o-Toluoyl)-3-O-imidazolylthiocarbonyl-1,2-isopropylidene-α-d-xylofuranose (1.05 g, 2.50 mmol) and AIBN (0.254 g, 1.50 mmol) were solubilized in toluene (50 mL). The resulting solution was stirred at 105 °C for 25 min, and then tri-n-butyltin hydride (0.87 mL, 3.00 mmol) was added dropwise over 1 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for an additional 2.5 h at 105 °C, and then it was cooled to room temperature and evaporated in vacuo. The crude residue was dissolved in EtOAc (200 mL) and washed with water (200 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude product that was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 4:1) to afford 5-O-(o-toluoyl)-1,2-isopropylidene-3-deoxyxylofuranose (0.50 g, 60%) as a colorless oil. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95–7.92 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.42–7.37 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.26–7.21 (m, 4H, ArH), 5.96 (d, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz, H-1′), 5.87 (d, 1H, J = 3.7 Hz, H-1′), 4.79–4.76 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.59 (dd, 1H, J = 10.5, 4.1 Hz, H-5′), 4.79–4.45 (m, 5H, H-4′, H-4′, H-5′, H-5″, H-5″), 2.21–2.15 (m, 1H, H-3′), 1.77 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.1, 10.7, 4.9 Hz, H-3″), 2.60 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.59 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 1.54 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.50 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.33 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.5 (CO), 140.5 (ArC), 132.4 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 131.9 (ArC), 131.0 (ArC), 125.9 (ArC), 112.0 (OCO), 105.5 (1′-C), 84.6 (4′-C), 76.0 (2′-CH), 62.5 (5′-CH2), 35.7 (3′-CH), 27.0 (CH3), 26.5 (CH3), 22.0 (CH3); HRMS for C16H20O5 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 315.1203, found: 315.1195. To a round-bottom flask containing 5-O-(o-toluoyl)-1,2-isopropylidene-3-deoxyxylofuranose (0.292 g, 1.00 mmol) were added acetic acid (5.0 mL) and acetic anhydride (3.0 mL). The reaction mixture was then cooled to 0 °C and then H2SO4 (0.5 mL) was added the stirring was continued overnight. The reaction mixture was then diluted with EtOAc (50 mL) and washed with a saturated solution of NaHCO3 (200 mL), water (50 mL), and brine (50 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo to give a crude residue that was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 28 (0.32 g, 95%) as a colorless oil and anomeric mixture. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.43–7.38 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.27–7.21 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.19 (s, 1H, H-1′), 5.23 (dd, 1H, J = 4.2, 1.5 Hz, H-2′), 4.73–4.67 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.47 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 3.9 Hz, H-5′), 4.33 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 5.6 Hz, H-5″), 2.61 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.25–2.20 (m, 2H, H-3′, H-3″), 2.09 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.96 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.2 (ArCO), 169.5 (1′-CO), 167.3 (2′-CO), 140.7 (ArC), 132.5 (ArC), 132.0 (ArC), 130.9 (ArC), 125.9 (ArC), 121.6 (ArC), 99.6 (1′-CH), 78.9 (4′-CH), 76.9 (2′-CH), 66.1.0 (5′-CH2), 31.9 (3′-CH2), 22.0 (ArCH3), 21.3 (COCH3), 21.1 (COCH3); HRMS for C17H20O7 [M − H] Calc.: 335.1136, found: 335.1121.
5′-O-(o-Toluoyl)-2′-O-acetyl-3′-deoxythymidine (29a). Following the general procedure for sugar-base condensation, a solution of thymine (0.302 g, 2.40 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was reacted with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (1.46 mL, 6.00 mmol), a solution of 28 (0.672 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL), and TMSOTf (0.46 mL, 2.50 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 3:2) to afford compound 29a (0.803 g) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.76 (s, 1H, NH), 7.92–7.14 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.45–7.40 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.28–7.22 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.14 (d, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz, H-6), 5.85 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz, H-1′), 5.35 (dt, 1H, J = 9.5, 2.3 Hz, H-2′), 4.65 (dd, J = 12.6, 2.7 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 4.60 (dddd, J = 6.6, 5.6, 5.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H, H-4′), 4.47 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 5.0 Hz, H-5″), 2.60 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.40 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.0, 9.5, 6.6 Hz, H-3′), 2.19 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.0, 5.6, 2.2 Hz, H-3″), 2.12 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.65 (d, J = 1.1 Hz, 3H, 6-CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.3 (CO), 167.2 (CO), 163.7 (4-C), 150.2 (2-C), 140.8 (6-C), 135.8 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.5 (ArC), 130.5 (ArC), 126.2 (ArC), 111.5 (5-CH), 91.3 (1′-CH), 77.9 (4′-CH), 77.6 (2′-CH), 64.6 (5′-CH2), 33.1 (3′-CH), 21.9 (CH3), 21.1 (CH3), 12.1 (6-CH3); HRMS for C20H22N2O7 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 403.1499, found: 403.1495.
5′-O-(o-Toluoyl)-2′-O-acetyl-3′-deoxy-4-N-benzoylcytidine (29b). Following the general procedure for sugar-base condensation, a solution of N4-benzoylcytosine (0.538 g, 2.40 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was reacted with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (0.73 mL, 3.00 mmol), a solution of 28 (0.672 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL), and TMSOTf (0.46 mL, 2.50 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 1:1) to afford product 29b (0.677 g) as a white solid in 69% yield. The corresponding α-anomer was also isolated as a white solid (0.098 g, 10%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.00–7.99 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.90–7.89 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.79 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, H-6), 7.64–7.62 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.54–7.52 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.36–7.20 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.38 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz, H-5), 5.58–5.55 (m, 1H, H-4′), 5.51 (d, 1H, J = 4.7 Hz, H-1′), 4.42–4.40 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.56 (dd, 1H, J = 12.0, 4.2 Hz, H-5′), 4.40 (dd, 1H, J = 12.0, 6.2 Hz, H-5″), 2.23–2.17 (m, 1H, H-3′), 2.10–2.06 (m, 1H, H-3″), 2.57 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.28 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 186.4 (NHCO), 167.7 (ArCO), 166.6 (CH3CO), 162.2 (4-CN), 145.5 (2-CO), 140.6 (6-C), 133.3 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 131.7 (ArC), 130.5 (ArC), 129.1 (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 127.5 (ArC), 125.8 (ArC), 97.3 (5-C), 92.0 (1′-CH), 73.8 (4′-C), 70.3 (2′-C), 62.2 (5′-CH2), 36.5 (3′-CH2), 21.9 (CH3), 21.7 (CH3); HRMS for C26H25N3O7 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 492.1765, found: 492.1763.
5′-O-(o-Toluoyl)-2′-O-acetyl-3′-deoxy-6-chloropurine (29c). Following the general procedure for sugar-base condensation, a solution of 6-chloropurine (0.371 g, 2.40 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL) was reacted with N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide (1.46 mL, 6.00 mmol), a solution of 28 (0.672 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry CH3CN (10 mL), and TMSOTf (0.46 mL, 2.50 mmol) After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 3:2) to afford product 29c (0.473 g) as a white solid in 55% yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.65 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.24 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.78–7.16 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.10 (d, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz, H-1′), 5.84 (dt, 1H, J = 6.1, 1.3 Hz, H-2′), 4.78 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.4, 5.6, 5.3, 3.1 Hz, H-4′), 4.66 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 3.1 Hz, H-5′), 4.50 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 5.3 Hz, H-5″), 2.85 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.0, 10.4, 6.2 Hz, H-3′), 2.54 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.34 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.0, 5.6, 1.3 Hz, H-3″), 2.16 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 170.4 (ArCO), 167.1 (CO), 152.3 (6-C), 151.6 (2-C), 151.0 (4-C), 144.4 (8-C), 140.7 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 132.1 (ArC), 130.6 (ArC), 128.8 (ArC), 126.0 (5-CH), 90.9 (1′-CH), 79.4 (4′-CH), 78.0 (2′-CH), 64.6 (5′-CH2), 33.3 (3′-CH2), 21.9 (CH3), 21.1 (CH3); HRMS for C20H19Cl1N4O5 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 431.1116, found: 431.1115.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-deoxythymidine (30a). To a solution of 29a (0.402 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry MeOH (20 mL) was added K2CO3 (0.276 g, 2.00 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the resulting crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2:MeOH 9:1) to give 3′-deoxythymidine (0.241 g) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, MeOD): δ 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 1.1 Hz, H-6), 5.68 (d, 1H, J = 1.8 Hz, H-1′), 4.41 (dddd, 1H, J = 9.9, 3.2, 2.6, 2.5 Hz, H-4′), 4.33–4.32 (dt, 1H, J = 5.6, 1.8 Hz, H-2′), 3.93 (dd, 1H, J = 12.4, 2.6 Hz, H-5′), 3.67 (dd, 1H, J = 12.4, 3.2 Hz, H-5″), 2.13 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.4, 9.9, 5.6 Hz, H-3′), 1.87 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.4, 5.6, 2.5 Hz, H-3″), 1.86 (d, 3H, J = 1.1 Hz, CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, MeOD): δ 166.5 (4-C), 152.4 (2-C), 138.2 (6-C), 110.6 (5-CH), 93.6 (1′-CH), 82.5 (4′-CH), 77.0 (2′-CH), 63.1 (5′-CH2), 34.0 (3′-CH), 12.3 (6-CH3); HRMS for C10H14N2O5 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 265.0795, found: 265.0796. To a stirred solution of 3′-deoxythymidine (0.242 g, 1.00 mmol) and imidazole (0.070 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry DMF (5.0 mL) was added TBDPSCl (0.275 g, 1.00 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with saturated aq. NaHCO3 (100 mL), water, and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 3:2) to give product 30a (0.456 g) as a white solid in 95% yield. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.08 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.64 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 1.2 Hz, H-6), 7.45–7.37 (m, 6H, ArH), 5.68 (d, 1H, J = 2.1 Hz, H-1′), 4.54–4.51 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.46–4.44 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.10 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 2.5 Hz, H-5′), 3.75 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 3.4 Hz, H-5″), 2.20 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.2, 8.6, 6.4 Hz, H-3′), 1.99 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.2, 6.1, 3.3 Hz, H-3′), 1.62 (d, J = 1.2 Hz, 3H, CH3), 1.08 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.7 (4-C), 150.9 (2-C), 135.5 (ArC), 135.4 (ArC), 135.1 (6-C), 133.0 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 110.3 (5-CH), 93.6 (1′-CH), 82.5 (4′-CH), 77.0 (2′-CH), 63.1 (5′-CH2), 34.0 (3′-CH), 29.6 (C(CH3)3), 26.9 (3 × CH3), 12.2 (6-CH3); HRMS for C26H32N2O5Si1 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 481.2153, found: 481.2154.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-deoxycytidine (30b). To a solution of 29b (0.491 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry MeOH (20 mL) was added K2CO3 (0.415 g, 3.00 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the resulting crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2:MeOH 9:1) to give 3′-deoxycytidine (0.225 g) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.16 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 5.86 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 5.75 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.45 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.7, 5.4, 3.4, 2.7 Hz, H-4′), 4.28 (dd, 1H, J = 5.2, 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 3.97 (dd, 1H, J = 12.4, 2.7 Hz, H-5′), 3.71 (dd, 1H, J = 12.4, 3.4 Hz, H-5′), 2.02 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.3, 10.7, 5.2 Hz, H-3′), 1.85 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.3, 5.4, 1.6 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 167.8 (4-C), 158.4 (2-C), 142.6 (6-C), 118.6 (5-CH), 94.9 (1′-CH), 83.1 (4′-CH), 77.6 (2′-CH), 63.0 (5′-CH2), 33.5 (3′-CH2); HRMS for C9H13N3O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 228.0978, found: 228.0988. To a stirred solution of 3′-deoxycytidine (0.227 g, 1.00 mmol) and imidazole (0.070 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry DMF (5.0 mL) was added TBDPSCl (0.275 g, 1.00 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with saturated aq. NaHCO3 (100 mL), water, and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2:MeOH 9:1) to give compound 30b (0.432 g) as a white solid in 93% yield. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.80 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, H-6), 7.73–7.72 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.65–7.62 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.49–7.44 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.35–7.33 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.23–7.21 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.01 (s, 2H, NH2), 5.72 (d, 1H, J = 1.1 Hz, H-1′), 5.51 (d, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, H-5), 4.36 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.5, 3.5, 2.6, 1.5 Hz, H-4′), 4.12 (dt, 1H, J = 5.1, 1.1 Hz, H-2′), 4.02 (dd, 1H, J = 11.7, 2.6 Hz, H-5′), 3.72 (dd, 1H, J = 11.8, 3.5 Hz, H-5″), 3.50 (s, 1H, OH), 2.01 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.9, 5.2, 1.5 Hz, H-3′), 1.75 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.9, 10.5, 5.2 Hz, H-3″), 1.02 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 165.6 (4-C), 155.2 (2-C), 140.3 (6-C), 138.0 (ArC), 135.2 (ArC), 135.0 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.4 (ArC), 131.1 (ArC), 130.4 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 130.0 (ArC), 129.7 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 125.5 (5-CH), 92.2 (1′-CH), 80.2 (4′-CH), 75.4 (2′-CH), 64.4 (5′-CH2), 33.1 (3′-CH), 29.6 (C(CH3)3), 26.7 (CH3); HRMS for C25H31N3O4Si1 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 488.1976, found: 488.1976.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-deoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (30c). To a solution of 29c (0.430 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry MeOH (20 mL) was added K2CO3 (0.415 g, 3.00 mmol) and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The solvent was then removed in vacuo and the resulting crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 9:1) to give product 3′-deoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (0.260 g) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (500 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.62 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.52 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.08 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, H-1′), 4.74 (ddt, 1H, J = 5.8, 3.2, 2.2 Hz, H-2′), 4.56 (dddd, 1H, J = 8.7, 6.4, 3.5, 2.7 Hz, H-4′), 4.19 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.95 (dd, J = 12.4, 2.7 Hz, 1H, H-5′), 3.70 (dd, 1H, J = 12.4, 3.5 Hz, H-5″), 2.40 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.4, 8.7, 5.8 Hz, H-3′), 2.07 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.4, 6.4, 3.2 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, MeOD): δ 152.8 (6-C), 143.7 (2-C), 142.8 (4-C), 133.7 (8-C), 113.1 (5-CH), 84.2 (1′-CH), 73.4 (4′-CH), 67.4 (2′-CH), 54.5 (OCH3), 45.4 (5′-CH2), 45.4 (3′-CH2); HRMS for C11H14N4O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 267.1087, found: 267.1092. To a stirred mixture of 3′-deoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (0.266 g, 1.00 mmol) and imidazole (0.070 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry DMF (5.0 mL) was added TBDPSCl (0.275 g, 1.00 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL), and then washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to give compound 30c (0.463 g) as a white solid in 92% yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.50 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.31 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.66–7.60 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.45–7.32 (m, 6H, ArH), 5.98 (d, 1H, J = 2.7 Hz, H-1′), 5.13 (s, 1H, OH), 4.72 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.64–4.59 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.19 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.00 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 3.1 Hz, H-5′), 3.73 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 3.5 Hz, H-5″), 2.39 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.1, 7.2, 5.7 Hz, H-3′), 2.13 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.1, 6.6, 4.5 Hz, H-3″), 1.02 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.4 (6-C), 152.0 (2-C), 151.0 (4-C), 140.5 (8-C), 135.8 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 128.1 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 115.5 (5-CH), 93.2 (1′-CH), 81.7 (4′-CH), 76.7 (2′-CH), 65.2 (5′-CH2), 54.6 (OCH3), 33.4 (3′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.1 (CH3); HRMS: C27H32N4O4Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 505.2265, found: 505.2269.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-3′-deoxy-adenosine (30d). A 50 mL round-bottomed flask was charged with 29c (0.430 g, 1.00 mmol) and dry EtOH (10 mL) and the mixture was cooled to −20 °C. Then, a solution of NH3 in MeOH (10 mL, 7 N) was added and the mixture was stirred for 48 h. After removal of all the volatiles in vacuo, the resulting crude residue was purified by silica gel chromatography CH2Cl2/MeOH (7:3) to afford product 3′-deoxyadenosine (0.250 g) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, D2O): δ 8.26 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.14 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.01 (d, 1H, J = 2.2 Hz, H-1′), 4.76 (m, 2H, H-2′, H-4′), 3.91 (dd, 2H, J = 12.6, 2.7 Hz, H-5′), 3.71 (dd, 1H, J = 12.6, 4.5 Hz, H-5″), 2.28 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.6, 8.7, 5.7 Hz, H-3′), 2.20 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.6, 6.6, 3.2 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (150MHz, D2O): δ 155.3 (6-C), 152.3 (2-C), 148.0 (4-C), 139.6 (8-C), 118.6 (5-CH), 90.8 (1′-CH), 81.1 (4′-CH), 74.8 (2′-CH), 62.6 (5′-CH2), 32.9 (3′-CH2); HRMS for C10H13N5O3 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 252.1091, found: 252.1085. To a stirred mixture of 3′-deoxyadenosine (0.05 g, 0.25 mmol) and imidazole (0.070 g, 1.0 mmol) in anhydrous DMF (5 mL) was added TBDPSCl (0.275 g, 1.0 mmol) at −50 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was then purified by silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc) to afford compound 30d (0.112 g, 92%) as a white solid. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.32 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.18 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.67–7.32 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.02 (d, 1H, J = 1.5 Hz, H-1′), 4.71 (dt, 1H, J = 5.5, 1.6 Hz, H-2′), 4.57 (dddd, 1H, J = 8.9, 3.9, 2.8, 2.1 Hz, H-4′), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J = 11.6, 2.8 Hz, H-5′), 3.78 (dd, 1H, J = 11.7, 3.9 Hz, H-5″), 2.46 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.4, 8.9, 5.5 Hz, H-3′), 2.01 (ddd, 1H, J = 14.4, 5.6, 2.1 Hz, H-3″), 1.28 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 157.3 (6-C), 153.8 (2-C), 150.0 (4-C), 140.3 (8-C), 136.7 (ArC), 136.6 (ArC), 134.2 (ArC), 134.0 (ArC), 131.0 (ArC), 131.0 (ArC), 128.8 (ArC), 120.4 (5-CH), 93.2 (1′-CH), 82.7 (4′-CH), 77.0 (2′-CH), 66.0 (5′-CH2), 34.4 (3′-CH2), 31.6 (CCH3)3), 27.4 (CH3); HRMS for C26H31N5O3Si1 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 490.2268, found: 490.2273.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-O-o-toluoyl-4-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxycytidine (31a). To a stirred solution of 30b (0.93 g, 2.00 mmol) in dry DMF (30 mL), ortho-toluoyl chloride (0.386 g, 0.325 mL, 2.50 mmol) was added at 0 °C under an inert atmosphere. Next, imidazole (0.17 g, 2.50 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 31a as a colorless oil (1.17 g, 84%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.52 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 8.01–7.14 (m, 18H, ArH), 6.26 (s, 1H, H-1′), 5.58 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 5.27 (s, 1H, H-2′), 4.56–4.51 (m, 1H, H-4′), 4.27 (dd, 1H, J = 12.0, 2.0 Hz, H-5′), 3.79 (dd, 1H, J = 12.0, 2.5 Hz, H-5″), 2.62 (s, 3H, CH3) 2.51 (s, 3H, CH3) 2.14 (dd, 1H, J = 14.0, 4.9 Hz, H-3′), 2.13 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.9 Hz, 1H, H-3″), 1.15 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.1 (CO), 166.7 (CO), 163.2 (4-C), 154.9 (2-C), 145.0 (6-C), 138.3 (ArC), 137.7 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 132.1 (ArC), 131.7 (ArC), 131.2 (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 126.1 (ArC), 125.8 (ArC), 117.6 (5-CH), 91.3 (1′-CH), 82.0 (4′-CH), 79.2 (2′-CH), 63.6 (5′-CH2), 31.1 (3′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.2 (3 × CH3), 22.1 (ArCH3), 22.1 (ArCH3); HRMS: C41H43N3O6Si [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 724.2813, found: 724.2947.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-O-o-toluoyl-6-N-O-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxyadenosine (31b). To a stirred solution of 30d (0.489 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry pyridine (30 mL), ortho-toluoyl chloride (0.386 g, 0.325 mL, 2.5 mmol) was added at 0 °C under an inert atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight. It was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to give compound 31b as a colorless oil (0.580 g, 80%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.74 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.41 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.73–7.09 (m, 18H, ArH), 5.96 (d, 1H, J = 3.1 Hz, H-1′), 4.78 (ddd, 1H, J = 5.8, 3.1, 2.4 Hz, H-2′), 4.62 (ddt, 1H, J = 6.9, 3.9, 3.5 Hz, H-4′), 3.95 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 3.5 Hz, H-5′), 3.73 (dd, 1H, J = 11.5, 3.9 Hz, H-5″), 2.49 (s, 6H, ArCH3), 2.38 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.1, 6.9, 5.8 Hz, H-3′), 2.17 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.1, 6.9, 2.4 Hz, H-3″), 1.02 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.3 (CO), 152.2 (6-C), 151.8 (2-C), 151.6 (4-C), 143.1 (8-C), 139.2 (ArC), 135.5 (ArC), 134.9 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 131.3 (ArC), 131.3 (ArC), 129.9 (ArC), 129.3 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 127.7 (ArC), 125.4 (5-CH), 93.0 (1′-CH), 81.3 (4′-CH), 76.1 (2′-CH), 65.1 (5′-CH2), 33.5 (3′-CH2), 29.6 (C(CH3)3), 26.8 (3 × CH3), 19.9 (CH3), 19.1 (CH3); HRMS: C42H43N5O5Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 726.3106, found: 726.3123.
3′,5′-Bis-O-o-toluoyl-6-N-O-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxyadenosine (32). To a stirred solution of 3′-deoxyadenosine (0.251 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry pyridine (30 mL), o-toluoyl chloride (0.539 g, 0.453 mL, 3.50 mmol) was added at 0 °C under an inert atmosphere and stirred overnight at room temperature. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc:hexane 3:7) to afford 32 as a colorless oil (0.600 g, 99%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.49 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.10 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.99–7.19 (m, 12H, ArH), 6.26 (d, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz, H-1′), 6.07 (dt, 1H, J = 6.0, 1.3 Hz, H-2′), 4.85 (dddd, 1H, J = 9.2, 5.6, 5.4, 3.1 Hz, H-4′), 4.68 (dd, 1H, J = 12.1, 3.1 Hz, H-5′), 4.53 (dd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.4 Hz, H-5″), 3.18 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.98 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.9, 9.2, 6.0 Hz, H-3′), 2.60 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.56 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 2.46 (ddd, 1H, J = 12.9, 5.6, 1.3 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.1 (NHCO), 166.9 (CO), 166.3 (CO), 161.0 (6-C), 152.2 (2-C), 151.0 (4-C), 141.1 (8-C), 140.8 (ArC), 140.4 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 131.9 (ArC), 131.7 (ArC), 130.8 (ArC), 130.4 (ArC), 128.6 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 125.8 (ArC), 125.7 (ArC), 122.1 (5-CH), 90.4 (1′-CH), 78.9 (4′-CH), 78.1 (2′-CH), 64.6 (5′-CH2), 33.4 (3′-CH2), 21.9 (CH3), 21.8 (CH3), 21.6 (CH3).
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-keto-3′-deoxythymidine (33a). Following the general oxidation procedure, a solution of 30a (0.480 g, 1.00 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was reacted with DMP (0.425 g, 1.00 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 33a (0.476 g, 100%) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 10.2 (s, 1H, NH), 8.45–7.96 (m, 11H, ArH, H-6), 6.02 (s, 1H, H-1′), 5.10 (dddd, 1H, J = 8.4, 7.3, 4.8, 3.6 Hz, H-4′), 4.67 (dd, 1H, J = 11.3, 3.6 Hz, H-5′), 4.59 (dd, 1H, J = 11.2, 4.8 Hz, H-5″), 3.60 (dd, 1H, J = 18.8, 8.4 Hz, H-3′), 3.22 (dd, 1H, J = 18.7, 7.3 Hz, H-3″), 2.44 (d, 3H, J = 1.0 Hz, CH3), 1.77 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 207.0 (2′-CO), 163.9 (4-C), 150.3 (2-C), 138.4 (6-C), 135.8 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 133.2 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 112.0 (5-CH), 85.9 (1′-CH), 76.2 (4′-CH), 65.4 (5′-CH2), 36.6 (3′-CH), 29.9 (C(CH3)), 27.1 (6-CH3) 12.3 (6-CH3); HRMS for C26H30N2O5Si1 [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 501.1816, found: 501.1817.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-keto-3′-deoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (33b). Following the general oxidation procedure, a solution of 30c (0.504 g, 1.00 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was reacted with DMP (0.425 g, 1.00 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 33b (0.500 g, 99%) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.40 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.96 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.62–7.29 (m, 10H, ArH), 5.92 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.61 (dddd, 1H, J = 8.7, 6.7, 4.4, 3.9 Hz, H-4′), 4.18 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.03 (dd, 1H, J = 11.3, 3.9 Hz, H-5′), 3.90 (dd, 1H, J = 11.3, 4.4 Hz, H-5″), 3.24 (dd, 1H, J = 18.7, 8.7 Hz, H-3′), 2.79 (dd, 1H, J = 18.7, 6.7 Hz, H-3″), 1.03 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 206.9 (2′-CO), 161.4 (6-C), 152.7 (2-C), 151.7 (4-C), 141.5 (8-C), 135.8 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 127.9 (ArC), 122.0.0 (5-CH), 82.3 (1′-CH), 76.5 (4′-CH), 65.1 (5′-CH2), 54.6 (OCH3), 37.5 (3′-CH), 29.9 (C(CH3)), 27.0 (3 × CH3); HRMS for C27H30N4O4Si1 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 503.2108, found: 503.2102.
5′-O-(tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-keto-4-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxycytidine (33c). To a solution of 31a (0.701 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry THF (30 mL) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere was added potassium tert-butoxide (0.112 g, 1.00 mmol), and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL). The organic layer was dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc:hexane 1:1) to afford 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-4-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxycytidine as a colorless oil (0.466 g, 80%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.42 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-6), 7.66–7.26 (m, 14H, ArH), 5.77 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.59 (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz, H-5), 4.59 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.45 (br s, 1H, OH), 4.15–4.08 (m, 2H, H-4′, H-5′), 3.73 (d, 1H, J = 9.9 Hz, H-5″), 2.31–2.17 (m, 2H, H-3′,H-3″), 2.50 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.25 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.9 (CO), 162.7 (4-C), 156.2 (2-C), 144.8 (6-C), 137.6 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 134.4 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 132.8 (ArC), 131.9 (ArC), 131.7 (ArC), 130.3 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 127.4 (ArC), 126.3 (ArC), 96.5 (5-CH), 95.5 (1′-CH), 82.5 (4′-CH), 77.5 (2′-CH), 64.4 (5′-CH2), 32.7 (3′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.2 (3 × CH3), 20.3 (CH3); HRMS: C33H37N3O5Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 584.2575, found: 584.2586. Following the general oxidation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-4-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxycytidine (0.466 g, 0.80 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) was reacted with DMP (0.425 g, 1.00 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7:3) to afford compound 33c (0.46 g, 100%) as a white solid in quantitative yield. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 7.66–7.26 (m, 16H, ArH, H-5, H-6), 5.40 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.57–4.51 (m, 1H, H-4′), 3.99–3.97 (m, 2H, H-5′, H-5″), 3.03 (dd, 1H, J = 18.6, 8.1 Hz, H-3′), 2.63 (dd, 1H, J = 18.6, 7.6 Hz, H-3″), 2.51 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.25 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 206.0 (2′-CO), 163.6 (4-C), 154.6 (2-C), 148.2 (6-C), 137.9 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 133.3 (ArC), 132.0 (ArC), 131.9 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 127.4 (ArC), 126.4 (ArC), 117.7 (5-CH), 97.4 (1′-CH), 87.7 (4′-CH), 66.0 (5′-CH2), 37.0 (3′-CH2), 29.9 (C(CH3)3), 27.1 (3 × CH3), 20.4 (CH3); HRMS: C33H35N3O5Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 582.2418, found: 582.2429.
5′-O-o-Toluoyl-2′-keto-6-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxyadenosine (33d). To a stirred suspension of 32 (0.302 g, 0.50 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere was added potassium tert-butoxide (0.112 g, 1.00 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. It was then diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and washed with water (100 mL) and brine (100 mL). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 1:1) to afford 5′-O-o-toluoyl-6-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxyadenosine as a colorless oil (0.133 g, 55%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.34 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.94 (s, 1H, H-8), 8.61–7.73 (m, 8H, ArH), 6.42 (d, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz, H-1′), 5.01 (m), 1H, H-4′), 4.75 (m, 1H, H-2′), 4.64 (m, 2H, H-5′, H-5″), 3.65–3.55 (m, 1H, H-3′), 3.43–3.37 (m, 1H, H-3″), 3.27 (s, 3H, ArCH3), 3.11 (s, 3H, ArCH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.5 (NHCO), 166.8 (CO), 153.1 (6-C), 152.6 (2-C), 151.8 (4-C), 143.2 (8-C), 140.8 (ArC), 139.5 (ArC), 135.9 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 133.0 (ArC), 131.6 (ArC), 130.2 (ArC), 128.5 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 125.7 (5-CH), 85.8 (1′-CH), 84.8 (4′-CH), 75.1 (2′-CH), 64.2 (5′-CH2), 38.6 (3′-CH2), 27.2 (CH3), 20.2 (CH3). Following the general oxidation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-o-toluoyl-6-N-o-toluoyl-3′-deoxyadenosine (0.097 g, 0.20 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was reacted with DMP (0.106 g, 0.25 mmol). After work-up, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 3:2) to afford compound 33d (0.077 g, 80%) as a white solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.40 (s, 1H, H-2), 7.94 (s, 1H, H-8), 8.05–7.18 (m, 8H, ArH), 5.88 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.89 (dddd, 1H, J = 9.2, 6.7, 5.4, 3.3 Hz, H-4′), 4.72 (dd, 1H, J = 12.0, 3.3 Hz, H-5′), 4.60 (dd, 1H, J = 12.1, 5.4 Hz, H-5″), 3.31 (dd, 1H, J = 18.5, 9.2 Hz, H-3′), 2.94 (dd, 1H, J = 18.6, 6.7 Hz, H-3″), 2.55 (s, 6H, CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 206.8 (2′-CO), 167.1 (CO), 161.5 (CO), 152.7 (6-C), 151.5 (2-C), 142.0 (4-C), 141.8 (8-C), 140.9 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.1 (ArC), 130.9 (ArC), 126.0 (ArC), 122.0 (5-CH), 82.4 (1′-CH), 74.2 (4′-CH), 65.2 (5′-CH2), 37.9 (3′-CH2), 21.9 (CH3), 21.8 (CH3).
2′,2′-gem-Dichloro-3′-deoxythymidine (4a). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 33a (0.500 g, 1.04 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.822 g, 3.95 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 4:1) to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-3′-deoxythymidine (0.283 g, 51%) as a major compound and 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-3′-deoxythymidine as a minor side product (0.049 g, 10%). 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.91 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.37 (m, 11H, ArH, H-6), 6.55 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.37 (dddd, 1H, J = 12.4, 6.0, 3.2, 2.8 Hz, H-4′), 4.15 (dd, 1H, J = 14.3, 3.2 Hz, H-5′), 3.84 (dd, 1H, J = 14.3, 2.8 Hz, H-5″), 2.90 (dd, 1H, J = 16.7, 12.4 Hz, H-3′), 2.82 (dd, 1H, J = 16.7, 6.0 Hz, H-3″), 1.61 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.11 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 163.4 (4-C), 150.3 (2-C), 135.4 (6-C), 135.2 (ArC), 134.2 (ArC), 132.7 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 130.1 (ArC), 131.1 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 111.0 (5-CH), 92.8 (1′-CH), 89.2 (2′-C(Cl)2), 78.5 (4′-CH), 62.8 (5′-CH2), 47.2 (3′-CH), 29.6 (C(CH3)), 26.9 (3 × CH3) 12.0 (6-CH3); HRMS: C26H30N2O4SiCl2 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 533.1424, found: 533.1428. Data for 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′-chloro-2′,3′-didehydro-3′-deoxythymidine: 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.23 (s, 1H, NH), 7.66–7.60 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.46–7.344 (m, 6H, ArH), 7.06 (d, 1H, J = 1.3 Hz, H-6), 6.89 (dd, 1H, J = 3.8, 1.7 Hz, H-1′), 6.30 (t, 1H, J = 1.7 Hz, H-3′), 4.95–4.93 (m, 1H, H-4′), 3.90–3.89 (m, 2H, H-5′, H-5″),1.46 (d, 3H, J = 1.3 Hz, CH3), 1.09 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3);HRMS: C26H29N2O4SiCl [M + Na+]+ Calc.: 519.1477, found: 519.1477. Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-3′-deoxythymidine (0.266 g, 0.50 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was reacted with TBAF (0.75 mL, 0.75 mmol). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give 4a as a white solid (0.132 g, 90%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.18 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz, H-6), 6.51 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.44 (ddt, 1H, J = 10.8, 5.5, 2.4, Hz, H-4′), 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 2.4 Hz, H-5′), 3.76 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 2.4 Hz, H-5″), 2.86–2.85 (m, 2H, H-3′, H-3″), 1.88 (d, 3H, J = 2.3 Hz, CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 166.1 (4-C), 152.5 (2-C), 136.8 (6-C), 111.4 (5-CH), 93.9 (1′-CH), 91.2 (2′-C(Cl)2), 81.6 (4′-CH), 61.1 (5′-CH2), 46.4 (3′-CH), 12.4 (6-CH3); HRMS: C10H12Cl2N2O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 295.0246, found: 295.0244.
2′,2′-gem-Dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (4b). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 33b (0.500 g, 1.00 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.790 g, 3.80 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 4:1) to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (0.359 g, 65%) as a pale yellow solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.55 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.47 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.70–7.38 (m, 10H, ArH), 6.67 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.55 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.0, 5.3, 4.8, 3.2 Hz, H-4′), 4.20 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.13 (dd, 1H, J = 11.9, 3.2 Hz, H-5′), 3.87 (dd, 1H, J = 8.5, 4.8 Hz, H-5″), 3.24 (dd, 1H, J = 13.9, 10.0 Hz, H-3′), 2.86 (dd, 1H, J = 13.9, 5.3 Hz, H-3″), 1.13 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 161.4 (6-C), 152.7 (2-C), 149.2 (4-C), 140.2 (8-C), 135.8 (ArC), 135.7 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 130.3 (ArC), 128.2 (ArC), 128.0 (ArC), 121.9 (5-CH), 93.0 (1′-CH), 89.0 (2′-C(Cl)2), 80.0 (4′-CH), 63.7 (5′-CH2), 54.5 (OCH3), 45.9 (3′-CH), 29.9 (C(CH3)), 27.0 (3 × CH3); HRMS: C27H30N4O3SiCl2 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 557.1536, found: 557.1219. Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxy-6-methoxy-adenosine (0.278 g, 0.50 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was reacted with TBAF (0.75 mL, 0.75 mmol). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give compound 4b as a white solid (151 mg, 95%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): δ 8.95 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.58 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.77 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.62 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.5, 5.1, 2.9, 2.6 Hz, H-4′), 4.21 (s, 3H, OCH3), 4.09 (dd, 1H, J = 12.6, 2.6 Hz, H-5′), 3.87 (dd, 1H, J = 12.6, 2.9 Hz, H-5″), 3.20 (dd, 1H, J = 14.1, 10.5 Hz, H-3′), 2.98 (dd, 1H, J = 14.1, 5.1 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 162.4 (6-C), 153.7 (2-C), 153.1 (4-C), 142.4 (8-C), 121.8 (5-CH), 94.2 (1′-CH), 90.2 (2′-C(Cl)2), 82.4 (4′-CH), 61.7 (5′-CH2), 54.9 (OCH3), 45.7 (3′-CH); HRMS: C11H12Cl2N4O3 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 319.0359, found: 319.0361.
2′,2′-gem-Dichloro-4-N-o-toluoyl-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (34). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 33c (0.46 g, 0.80 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.632 g, 3.04 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 4:1) to give 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-4-N-o-toluoyl-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (0.350 g, 69%) as a pale yellow solid. 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): 8.40 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 7.68–7.26 (m, 15H, ArH, H-5), 6.67 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.45 (ddt, 1H, J = 10.8, 4.7, 2.3 Hz, H-4′), 4.24 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 2.3 Hz, H-5′), 3.80 (dd, 1H, J = 12.2, 2.3 Hz, H-5″), 2.94 (dd, 1H, J = 13.4, 10.8 Hz, H-3′), 2.76 (dd, 1H, J = 13.4, 4.7 Hz, H-3″), 2.52 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.15 (s, 9H, 3 × CH3); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 162.7 (4-C), 155.3 (2-C), 144.1 (6-C), 137.7 (ArC), 135.8 (ArC), 135.6 (ArC), 134.3 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 132.0 (ArC), 131.8 (ArC), 130.6 (ArC), 130.5 (ArC), 128.4 (ArC), 128.3 (ArC), 127.2 (ArC), 126.4 (ArC), 96.8 (5-CH), 93.4 (1′-CH), 89.0 (2′-C(Cl)2), 79.7 (4′-CH), 62.7 (5′-CH2), 46.0 (3′-CH2), 29.5 (C(CH3)3), 27.2 (3 × CH3), 20.4 (CH3); HRMS: C33H35Cl2N3O4Si [M + H+]+ Calc.: 636.1846, found: 636.1848. Following the general desilylation procedure, a solution of 5′-O-(tert-butyldiphenylsilyl)-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-4-N-o-toluoyl-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (0.350 g, 0.55 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was reacted with TBAF (0.82 mL, 0.82 mmol). After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (EtOAc) to give compound 34 as a white solid (0.217 g, 100%). 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): 8.76 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-6), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, H-5), 7.53–7.29 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.67 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.53 (ddt, 1H, J = 9.7, 6.2, 2.5, Hz, H-4′), 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 2.5 Hz, H-5′), 3.79 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 2.5 Hz, H-5″), 2.88–2.86 (m, 2H, H-3′, H-3′), 2.46 (s, 3H, CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 171.7 (CO), 165.0 (4-C), 158.0 (2-C), 145.7 (6-C), 138.0 (ArC), 136.2 (ArC), 132.2 (ArC), 132.2 (ArC), 128.6 (ArC), 126.9 (ArC), 98.3 (5-CH), 94.8 (1′-CH), 90.6 (2′-C(Cl)2), 82.0 (4′-CH), 61.1 (5′-CH2), 46.4 (3′-CH2), 19.9 (CH3); HRMS: C17H17Cl2N3O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 398.0668, found: 398.0665.
5′-O-o-Toluoyl-2′,2′-gem-dichloro-6-N-o-toluoyl-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine (35). Following the general chlorination procedure, a solution of compound 33d (0.048 g, 0.10 mmol) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was reacted with PCl5 (0.079 g, 0.38 mmol) at −78 °C under an inert atmosphere. After work-up, the resulting crude residue was purified by column chromatography (hexane:EtOAc 7.5:2.5) to give compound 35 (0.037 g, 70%) as a pale yellow solid. 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): δ 9.08 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.76 (s, 1H, H-8), 7.67–7.08 (m, 8H, ArH), 6.76 (s, 1H, H-1′), 4.60 (dddd, 1H, J = 10.5, 5.2, 3.0, 2.7 Hz, H-4′), 4.06 (dd, 1H, J = 12.6, 2.7 Hz, H-5′), 3.84 (dd, 1H, J = 12.6, 3.0 Hz, H-5″), 3.14 (dd, 1H, J = 14.2, 10.5 Hz, H-3′), 2.95 (dd, 1H, J = 14.2, 5.2 Hz, H-3″), 2.45 (s, 6H, 2 × CH3); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 173.5 (NHCO), 170.2 (CO), 154.6 (6-C), 153.5 (2-C), 152.5 (4-C), 145.5 (8-C), 140.1 (ArC), 136.1 (ArC), 132.6 (ArC), 132.3 (ArC), 129.9 (ArC), 129.1 (ArC), 126.5 (ArC), 126.5 (5-CH), 94.2 (1′-CH), 90.6 (2′- C(Cl)2), 82.5 (4′-CH), 61.5 (5′-CH2), 45.7 (3′-CH2), 20.1 (CH3), 14.4 (CH3); HRMS: C26H23Cl2N5O4 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 540.1199, found: 540.1211.
2′,2′-gem-Dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxycytidine (4c). To a stirred solution of 34 (0.050 g, 0.125 mmol) in EtOH (3.0 mL) at −20 °C was added a saturated solution of NH3 in EtOH. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 2 days at room temperature. After removal of all the volatiles in vacuo, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (EtOAc:MeOH 7.5:2.5) to give 4c as a white solid (0.031 g, 89%). HRMS: 1H-NMR (600 MHz, MeOD): 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, H-6), 6.63 (s, 1H, H-1′), 5.91 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, H-5), 4.43 (ddt, 1H, J = 10.4, 5.1, 2.6 Hz, H-4′), 4.02 (dd, 1H, J = 12.8, 2.6 Hz, H-5′), 3.76 (dd, 1H, J = 12.7, 2.7 Hz, H-5″), 2.84 (dd, 1H, J = 13.7, 10.4 Hz, H-3′), 2.79 (dd, 1H, J = 13.8, 5.1 Hz, H-3′); 13C-NMR (150 MHz, MeOD): δ 167.6 (4-C), 158.2 (2-C), 141.7 (6-C), 96.1 (5-CH), 94.5 (1′-CH), 91.2 (2′-(CCl)2), 81.2 (4′-CH), 61.3 (5′-CH2), 46.7 (3′-CH2); C9H11Cl2N3O3 [M + H+]+ Calc.: 280.0250, found: 280.0250.
2′,2′-gem-Dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxyadenosine (4d). To a stirred solution of 35 (0.037 g, 0.068 mmol) in dry MeOH (5.0 mL) was added K2CO3 (0.138 g, 0.10 mmol), and then the reaction mixture was stirred for 48 h. After removal of all the volatiles, the crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (MeOH:CHCl3 1.5:8.5 to 2.5:7.5) to give 4d as a white solid (0.0092 mg, 45%). 1H-NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.88 (s, 1H, H-2), 8.62 (s, 1H, H-8), 6.70 (s, 1H, H-1′), 5.52 (s, 1H, OH), 4.51 (dddd, 1H, J = 8.7, 7.7, 3.9, 3.2, H-4′), 3.92 (dd, 1H, J = 12.5, 8.7 Hz, H-5′), 3.76 (dd, 1H, J = 12.5, 3.2 Hz, H-5′), 3.17 (dd, 1H, J = 11.1, 7.7 Hz, H-3′), 3.06 (dd, 1H, J = 11.1, 3.9 Hz, H-3″); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 160.6 (6-C), 152.3 (2-C), 151.9 (4-C), 141.0 (8-C), 120.7 (5-CH), 92.1 (1′-CH), 89.8 (2′-C(CCl)2), 81.0 (4′-CH), 60.5 (5′-CH2), 44.4 (3′-CH2); HRMS: C10H11Cl2N5O2 [M + NH4+]+ Calc.: 321.0395, found: 321.0328.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a new method for the preparation of two different sets of sugar chlorinated nucleosides starting from 2′-and 3′-ketonucleoside intermediates was developed. The reaction of 3′-keto-2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides in the presence of phosphorus pentachloride afforded the corresponding 3′,3′-gem-dichloride derivatives in moderate yields. An elimination reaction was found to be a significant side process leading to the concomitant formation of vinyl 3′-monochlorinated products. The method was extended to the chemoselective formation of 2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides in good yields under the same reaction conditions. This work contributes to the development of general synthetic strategies for the synthesis of modified nucleosides as well as structure-activity relationship studies on such compounds as potential antiviral agents.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Physical and spectroscopic data of the relevant compounds.

Author Contributions

P.H. conceived the study; F.d.P.S., E.G. and P.H. designed the experiments and analyzed the data; F.d.P.S. performed the experiments; P.H. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; E.G. with the assistance of F.d.P.S wrote the paper.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Jef Rozenski, Eveline Lescrinier, and Luc Baudemprez for recording the HRMS and NMR spectra. We would like to thank Christophe Pannecouque and Kristien Erven for carrying out the antiviral screening.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jordheim, L.P.; Durantel, D.; Zoulim, F.; Dumontet, C. Advances in the development of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues for cancer and viral diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 447–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Meanwell, N.A. Synopsis of some recent tactical application of bioisosteres in drug design. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2529–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lu, Y.X.; Shi, T.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.Y.; Yan, X.H.; Luo, X.M.; Jiang, H.L.; Zhu, W.L. Halogen bonding—A novel interaction for rational drug design? J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 2854–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Uesugi, S.; Miki, H.; Ikehara, M.; Iwahashi, H.; Kyogoku, Y. Linear relationship between electronegativity of 2′-substituents and conformation of adenine nucleosides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 4073–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sirimulla, S.; Bailey, J.B.; Vegesna, R.; Narayan, M. Halogen interactions in protein-ligand complexes: Implications of halogen bonding for rational drug design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 2781–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Xu, Z.J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, Y.T.; Lu, Y.X.; Chen, K.X.; Zhu, W.L. Halogen bond: Its role beyond drug-target binding affinity for drug discovery and development. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pinho, P.; Kalayanov, G.; Westerlind, H.; Rosenquist, A.; Wahling, H.; Sund, C.; Almeida, M.; Ayesa, S.; Tejbrant, J.; Targett-Adams, P.; et al. Discovery of beta-D-2′-deoxy-2′-dichlorouridine nucleotide prodrugs as potent inhibitors of hepatitis C virus replication. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2017, 27, 3468–3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, S.M.; Mahmoud, S.; Liu, P.; Zhou, L.H.; Ehteshami, M.; Bassit, L.; Tao, S.J.; Domaoal, R.A.; Sari, O.; De Schutter, C.; et al. 2′-Chloro,2′-fluoro ribonucleotide prodrugs with potent pan-genotypic activity against hepatitis C virus replication in culture. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 5424–5437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Habibian, M.; Martinez-Montero, S.; Portella, G.; Chua, Z.J.; Bohle, D.S.; Orozco, M.; Damha, M.J. Seven-membered ring nucleoside analogues: Stereoselective synthesis and studies on their conformational properties. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5416–5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Etzold, G.; Hintsche, R.; Kowollik, G.; Langen, P. Nucleosides of fluoro sugars 6. Synthesis and reactivity of 3′-fluoro-3′-desoxythymidine and 3′-chloro-3′-desoxythymidine. Tetrahedron 1971, 27, 2463–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vanheusden, V.; Munier-Lehmann, H.; Pochet, S.; Herdewijn, P.; Van Calenbergh, S. Synthesis and evaluation of thymidine-5′-O-monophosphate analogues as inhibitors of mycobacterium tuberculosis thymidylate kinase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 2695–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kikugawa, K.; Ichino, M. Direct halogenation of sugar moiety of nucleosides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jarvi, E.T.; McCarthy, J.R.; Mehdi, S.; Matthews, D.P.; Edwards, M.L.; Prakash, N.J.; Bowlin, T.L.; Sunkara, P.S.; Bey, P. 4′,5′-Unsaturated 5′-halogenated nucleosides—Mechanism-based and competitive inhibitors of S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine hydrolase. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Shakya, N.; Srivastav, N.C.; Desroches, N.; Agrawal, B.; Kunimoto, D.Y.; Kumar, R. 3′-Bromo analogues of pyrimidine nucleosides as a new class of potent inhibitors of mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 4130–4140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, G.Y.; Deval, J.; Hong, J.; Dyatkina, N.; Prhavc, M.; Taylor, J.; Fung, A.; Jin, Z.N.; Stevens, S.K.; Serebryany, V.; et al. Discovery of 4′-chloromethyl-2′-deoxy-3′,5′-di-O-isobutyryl-2′-fluorocytidine (ALS-8176), a first-in-class RSV polymerase inhibitor for treatment of human respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58, 1862–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ohuchi, S.; Singh, R.K.; Wada, T.; Hata, T. Facile chlorination of sugar moiety of nucleosides by use of tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)dichlorophosphorane. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1505–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Verheyden, J.P.H.; Moffatt, J.G. Halo sugar nucleosides 3. Reactions for chlorination and bromination of nucleoside hydroxyl groups. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2289–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Watanabe, K.A.; Su, T.L.; Klein, R.S.; Chu, C.K.; Matsuda, A.; Chun, M.W.; Lopez, C.; Fox, J.J. Nucleosides 123. Synthesis of antiviral nucleosides–5-Substituted 1-(2-deoxy-2-halogeno-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)cytosines and-uracils–Some structure activity relationships. J. Med. Chem. 1983, 26, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Corey, E.J.; Venkateswarlu, A. Protection of hydroxyl groups as tert-butyldimethylsilyl derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 6190–6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Larsen, E.; Kofoed, T.; Pedersen, E.B. Synthesis of 2,3′-anhydro-2′-deoxyuridines and 2′,3′-didehydro-2′,3′-dideoxyuridines using polymer-supported fluoride. Synthesis 1995, 1121–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nudelman, A.; Bechor, Y.; Falb, E.; Fischer, B.; Wexler, B.A.; Nudelman, A. Acetyl chloride-methanol as a convenient reagent for: (A) quantitative formation of amine hydrochlorides (B) carboxylate ester formation (C) mild removal of N-t-Boc-protective group. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rieke, R.D.; Bales, S.E.; Hudnall, P.M.; Burns, T.P.; Poindexter, G.S. Highly reactive magnesium for the preparation of grignard-reagents–1-Norbornanecarboxylic acid. Org. Synth. 1988, 50–59, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Appel, R.; Knoll, F.; Michel, W.; Morbach, W.; Wihler, H.D.; Veltmann, H. General reaction of phosphines and carbon-tetrachloride on nucleophiles 29. Reactions in system triphenylphosphine-carbon tetrachloride. Chem. Ber. Recl. 1976, 109, 58–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vinczer, P.; Struhar, S.; Novak, L.; Szantay, C. Chemistry of the Wittig reaction 4. Simple conversion of aldehydes to 1,1-dichloroalkane and 1,1-dichloro-1-alkene derivatives, useful intermediates for the synthesis of acetylenic compounds. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 683–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aghapour, G.; Afzali, A. Facile conversion of aldehydes and ketones to gem-dichlorides using chlorodiphenylphosphine/N-chlorosuccinimide as a new and neutral system. Synth. Commun. 2008, 38, 4023–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Imazawa, M.; Eckstein, F. Synthesis of 3′-azido-2′,3′-dideoxyribofuranosylpurines. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3044–3048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Moravcova, J.; Capkova, J.; Stanek, J. One-pot synthesis of 1,2-O-isopropylidene-alpha-D-xylofuranose. Carbohydr. Res. 1994, 263, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hansske, F.; Madej, D.; Robins, M.J. Nucleic-acid related-compounds 44. 2′ and 3′-Ketonucleosides and their arabino and xylo reduction products–Convenient access via selective protection and oxidation of ribonucleosides. Tetrahedron 1984, 40, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lin, T.S.; Yang, J.H.; Liu, M.C.; Shen, Z.Y.; Cheng, Y.C.; Prusoff, W.H.; Birnbaum, G.I.; Giziewicz, J.; Ghazzouli, I.; Brankovan, V.; et al. Synthesis and anticancer activity of various 3′-deoxy pyrimidine nucleoside analogs and crystal-structure of 1-(3-deoxy-beta-D-threo-pentofuranosyl)cytosine. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Figure 1. Selected biologically active (12) and targeted (34) sugar chlorinated nucleos(t)ide analogues.
Figure 1. Selected biologically active (12) and targeted (34) sugar chlorinated nucleos(t)ide analogues.
Molecules 23 01457 g001
Scheme 1. Initial attempted route towards the preparation of gem-dichlorinated nucleosides.
Scheme 1. Initial attempted route towards the preparation of gem-dichlorinated nucleosides.
Molecules 23 01457 sch001
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dicloro and 2′,3′-vinyl-3′-chloro 2′-deoxythymidine analogues.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dicloro and 2′,3′-vinyl-3′-chloro 2′-deoxythymidine analogues.
Molecules 23 01457 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dicloro and 2′,3′-vinyl-3′-chloro 2′-deoxycytidine analogues.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dicloro and 2′,3′-vinyl-3′-chloro 2′-deoxycytidine analogues.
Molecules 23 01457 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dichloro 2′-deoxyadenosine analogue 3c.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of 3′,3′-gem-dichloro 2′-deoxyadenosine analogue 3c.
Molecules 23 01457 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 2′-keto-3′-deoxynucleoside precursors.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of 2′-keto-3′-deoxynucleoside precursors.
Molecules 23 01457 sch005
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides.
Scheme 6. Synthesis of 2′,2′-gem-dichloro-2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides.
Molecules 23 01457 sch006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Da Paixao Soares, F.; Groaz, E.; Herdewijn, P. Phosphorus Pentachloride Promoted gem-Dichlorination of 2′- and 3′-Deoxynucleosides. Molecules 2018, 23, 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061457

AMA Style

Da Paixao Soares F, Groaz E, Herdewijn P. Phosphorus Pentachloride Promoted gem-Dichlorination of 2′- and 3′-Deoxynucleosides. Molecules. 2018; 23(6):1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Da Paixao Soares, Fabio, Elisabetta Groaz, and Piet Herdewijn. 2018. "Phosphorus Pentachloride Promoted gem-Dichlorination of 2′- and 3′-Deoxynucleosides" Molecules 23, no. 6: 1457. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061457

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop