2.3. Quantification of Plasma NOx Levels
Figure 5 shows the time-course of the plasma NOx concentrations 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after oral 12 mM SNAC administration to Swiss mice. We observed a significant increase in absolute plasma NOx levels at all time points, and the maximum increase (relative to the basal level) occurred after 60 min. After this time, plasma NOx levels began to decrease, although the levels were still significantly higher than basal levels 2 h after gavage.
Figure 6 shows the dose-response of plasma NOx concentration 1 h after 1.2, 12 and 60 mM (corresponding to 7.0 μmol/kg, 70 μmol/kg and 350 μmol/kg, respectively) oral SNAC administration to Swiss mice compared to control naive animals and to animals that received only distilled water. While the plasma NOx concentration of the animals that received 1.2 mM SNAC did not significantly change compared to control animals (approximately 20 μM), 12 and 60 mM SNAC administration led to a significant dose-response increase in plasma NOx concentrations, which reached 45 ± 12 µM and 103 ± 15 µM, respectively. For this reason, we chose 12 mM SNAC and equimolar NaNO
2 and NaNO
3 solutions as the highest concentrations for evaluating their effects on the GMBF increase and time course of plasma NOx levels after oral SNAC administration, as described above.
Figure 4.
Ex vivo Laser Doppler measurements of rat gastric mucosal blood flow in a gastric chamber after incubation with PBS only over 20 min (control) or PBS solution for 3 min, followed by 12 mM NaNO2 or NaNO3 solutions for the next 10 min, which were replaced by PBS during the last 7 min, as indicated by the horizontal bars. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of triplicates.
Figure 4.
Ex vivo Laser Doppler measurements of rat gastric mucosal blood flow in a gastric chamber after incubation with PBS only over 20 min (control) or PBS solution for 3 min, followed by 12 mM NaNO2 or NaNO3 solutions for the next 10 min, which were replaced by PBS during the last 7 min, as indicated by the horizontal bars. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of triplicates.
Figure 5.
Plasma NOx levels 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after 12 mM oral SNAC administration to Swiss mice. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). * p < 0.05 compared to “Before gavage” group, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 5.
Plasma NOx levels 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after 12 mM oral SNAC administration to Swiss mice. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). * p < 0.05 compared to “Before gavage” group, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 6.
Dose-response of plasma NOx concentration 60 min after 1.2, 12 and 60 mM oral SNAC administration. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). * p < 0.05 compared to control animals, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
Figure 6.
Dose-response of plasma NOx concentration 60 min after 1.2, 12 and 60 mM oral SNAC administration. The results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3). * p < 0.05 compared to control animals, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test.
2.4. Discussion
This is the first study to our knowledge where an
ex vivo gastric chamber method was used to investigate the effect of luminal SNAC administration on GMBF and where the physiological effects of SNAC were correlated with the rates of spontaneous NO release from SNAC solutions. Characterization of these rates showed that aqueous SNAC solutions continuously release free NO after its formation from NAC S-nitrosation. The initial narrow peaks observed in chemiluminescence NO detection (
Figure 2) can be assigned to spontaneously released NO by SNAC molecules, which accumulates in the solutions prior to analysis. Immediately after solution injection into the NO analyzer reaction flask, which is continuously flushed by N
2, the accumulated NO is immediately carried to the detector, resulting in the observed narrow transient peaks. We confirmed the rapid free NO accumulation in SNAC solutions by allowing NO to re-accumulate in the solution after its removal by the instrument’s N
2 flow, (
Figure S3), as interruption of N
2 flow after recording the first narrow peak leads to new narrow peaks upon N
2 flow reestablishment. The plateau signal that follows the initial NO peak reflects steady NO production from SNAC during the measurement time period. NO generated in both the peak and the plateau comes from the bimolecular reaction of two SNAC molecules to form a sulfur-bridged NAC dimer with the concomitant release of two NO molecules according to
Scheme 1.
Scheme 1.
Spontaneous NO release from SNAC.
Scheme 1.
Spontaneous NO release from SNAC.
The rate of reaction 1 depends on SNAC concentration, as previously reported [
17]. Thus, the rapid GMBF increase immediately after luminal SNAC application on the gastric mucosa can be assigned to the NO released in reaction 1. Increased GMBF maintenance while the gastric mucosa is incubated with the SNAC solutions is likely due to the approximately constant rate of NO released during the plateau phase of SNAC decomposition, as shown in the kinetic curves of
Figure 2A,B. NO released in
scheme 1 is expected to diffuse through the mucous layer of the gastric mucosa, the mucosal capillary bed and the muscularis mucosa, reaching the arterial and venous plexuses of the submucosa. Through this diffusion process, NO can activate soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in the smooth muscle cells (SMC) of the mucosal capillary bed and of the arterial and venous plexuses of the submucosa microvasculature, including the arterioles and the capillary network, which drains into the venules that accompany the arterioles. sGC activation in the microvasculature SMCs elicits a cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent vasodilatory response, according to the well-known NO-mediated vasodilation mechanism [
18].
The observed GMBF increase can be assigned exclusively to exogenous NO released by SNAC and is independent of the endothelium, which is itself a major source of NO and of other vasoactive paracrine factors. Although the NO release rate from the 12 mM SNAC solution (14 nmol·mL−1·min−1) is 4.7 times higher than from 600 μM SNAC (0.3 nmol·mL−1·min−1), there was no significant difference between the maxima GMBF plateaus from these two solutions. These results suggest that the maximum subepithelial microcirculation vasodilation was already achieved with 600 μM SNAC. The apparent microvasculature tolerance to further increases in blood flow with higher SNAC concentrations is likely associated with the maximum mechanically possible SMC relaxation. However, other mechanisms, such as the depletion of endogenous species involved in cGMP-dependent NO signaling to vasodilation or to metabolic and myogenic mechanisms that operate in the auto-regulatory responses in arteries and arterioles to restore blood flow to basal conditions, cannot be ruled out.
The increased GMBF upon 600 μM SNAC application has great potential to counteract NSAID-induced injuries, at least in in the present animal model, considering that a maximum GMBF decrease of 25% was observed in indomethacin or diclofenac-treated Sprague Dawley rats [
19], while in the present study, luminal SNAC application resulted in GMBF increases greater than 250% in the same animal model. In contrast, NaNO
2 and NaNO
3 solutions did not affect GMBF in the conditions used in the present study. Although Petersson
et al. [
20] reported a similar study in which NaNO
2 incubation increased GMBF, the authors used acidic NaNO
2 solutions in which NaNO
2 is converted to nitrous acid (HONO), which undergoes decomposition to release free NO (
Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Nitric oxide release from acid nitrite solution.
Scheme 2.
Nitric oxide release from acid nitrite solution.
This is also the fate of nitrite coming from the reduction of dietary nitrate, which is known to be metabolized
in vivo to NO, a pathway involved in the mediation of blood flow regulation [
21]. Therefore, in the normal situation the administration of nitrite to healthy patients with acidic luminal pH, is expected to lead to NO production with consequent GMBF increase. In the
ex vivo gastric chamber condition of the present study the normal protective effect of the buffered stomach mucous layer can be compromised, thus the SNAC, NaNO
2 and NaNO
3 solutions were buffered at pH 7.4 in order to avoid any possible artifact due to gastric acid damage caused by the administration of these solutions at the acidic luminal pH 1–2. A special point must be raised for patients receiving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) co-therapy with NSAIDs. In these cases, the intragastric pH can be higher than 6 [
22,
23] and the administration of nitrite or nitrate to increase GMBF would be ineffective, while SNAC administration could enhance the protective action of the PPI therapy. In this respect, the characterization of the effects of SNAC, NaNO
2 and NaNO
3 on the GMBF at pH 7.4 allows proposing a potential therapeutic action of SNAC for patients taking PPI. In addition, as nitrate is incapable of generating NO in the absence of nitrate reductases, luminal administration of NaNO
3 solution at pH 7.4 was used as a negative control in our study.
Our chemiluminescence measurements of NO release from 12 mM NaNO
2 solution (pH 7.4) showed a rate of NO formation of 0.06 nmol·mL
−1·min
−1, which is fivefold lower than the rate of NO released from 600 μM SNAC, and this does not lead to significant blood flow increase as measured by Laser Doppler Flowmetry. In the case of 12 mM NaNO
3 solution, no equilibrium implying NO production can be established in the absence of NO
3− to NO
2− reducing agents, which in turn, could produce NO according to reaction 2. This hypothesis is supported by the absence of vasodilation upon 12 mM NaNO
3 application (
Figure 2D) and the absence of chemiluminescence of NO release. In this case, the quantitatively insignificant narrow NO peak (
Figure 2D), can be assigned to the presence of trace amounts of NaNO
2 in the NaNO
3 reagent. We also investigated the kinetic behavior of NO release from SNAC solutions 600 μM and 12 mM at the pH 1.2 using a simulated gastric fluid (SGF) medium. The results obtained are shown in
Figure S4 where it can be seen that in the SGF both the NO release profile and the rate of NO release from the SNAC solution 600 μM are very similar to those obtained at pH 7.4. However, the SNAC solution 12 mM showed a different NO release profile, which led to a much higher rate of NO release. The similar behavior of the SNAC 600 μM solution at pH 7.4 and 1.2 is in accordance with previous studies which showed that GSNO, also a primary S-nitrosothiol, has an enhanced stability in highly acidic pH [
24]. The higher rate of NO release observed for the SNAC solution 12 mM at pH 1.2 may be associated with the catalytic action of trace metal ions present in the SGF reagents, and is expected to be more prominent in concentrated S-nitrosothiol solutions, which are subjected to autocatalytic effect on their thermal decomposition [
17]. For therapeutic purposes, one may consider that the less concentrated SNAC solution 600 uM is already capable of promoting the maximum GMBF increase, as shown in
Figure 4, and that its rate of NO release will not be significantly affected by the stomach pH in the range 1.2 to 7.4.
The profile of plasma NOx levels after SNAC administration shows a significant increase after 30 min reaching a maximum after 60 min, compared to the basal level. This profile suggests that, despite the fast NO release from the SNAC solutions displayed in
Figure 2, the increase in plasma NOx concentration is governed by the kinetics of NOx absorption in the gastric mucosa, followed by the distribution of these species in the systemic circulation. , The decrease of the plasma NOX levels after 1 h, reflects the fast diffusion of the primary NO products (NO
2− and NO
3−) though the stomach and intestine and a fast clearance of these anions from the blood. Our results are in accordance with those reported by Pannala
et al. who found that urinary excretion in humans leads to total nitrate clearance in a 24-h period [
25]. In addition, the basal NOx levels (approximately 20 μM) are also in accordance with previous reports of plasma and urinary NOx levels in animals. For example, Fletcher
et al. [
26] reported plasma NOx levels of approximately 17 μM in naive Lewis rats, compared to values up to 56 ± 18 μM under inflammatory conditions after arthritis induction. Amsterdam
et al. [
27] analyzed Wistar rats and rabbits and found basal plasma NOx levels of 34 and 61 μM, respectively. Plasma NOx measurements in diabetic rats also led to values in the same order of magnitude, such as those reported by Kino
et al. [
28] of 20 μM for control Wistar rats and 12 and 14 μM for diabetic Wistar rats, a condition of impaired NO production.
Notably, only oral 12 and 60 mM SNAC administration (corresponding to 70 μmol/kg and 350 μmol/kg, respectively) led to significant increases in average plasma NOx levels in mice. However, luminal 600 μM SNAC administration (a concentration 20 times lower than 12 mM) on rat stomachs was sufficient for a marked increase in GMBF. Therefore, the local actions of SNAC, such as GMBF increase, do not necessarily imply increases in plasma NOx above basal levels. Similarly, other studies have reported therapeutic and protective actions of SNAC using much lower doses and concentrations, such as the attenuation of liver fibrosis in cirrhotic rats with 6 μmol/kg/day oral SNAC [
16], and the reduction of ischemia reperfusion lesions in the steatotic liver [
14] and a protection of livers during cold storage [
29] in rats, both using 0.1 μM SNAC. Therefore, the potential therapeutic actions of SNAC may be obtained in an ample concentration range without necessarily impacting the homeostatic plasma NOx levels.
Finally, further studies are necessary to investigate whether SNAC completely decomposes in the stomach lumen after administration, and only the free NO diffuses through the gastric mucosa leading to GMBF increase with a subsequent plasma NOx increase, or whether intact SNAC also crosses the gastrointestinal barrier into the submucosal microcirculation, where it may release NO
in situ, also leading to GMBF increase. In any case, at a neutral pH, the contribution of exogenous NO
2− to free NO production is negligible, and both NO
2− and NO
3− ions likely follow excretion pathways without increasing GMBF. These mechanistic possibilities are schematically shown in
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Scheme of the major pathways involved in the vasodilation action of SNAC on the gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) compared to nitrite (NO2−) and nitrate (NO3−) anions. Orally or luminally administered SNAC spontaneously releases NO into the stomach lumen. Free NO diffuses through the gastric mucosa into the submucosal blood vessels, where it increases GMBF. Intact SNAC molecules may also diffuse through the gastric mucosa into the submucosal blood vessels, where in situ NO release may lead to vasodilation. At neutral pH, NO2− and NO3− anions from oral or luminal sources diffuse to the submucosal blood vessels where they contribute to NO-derived NO2− and NO3− levels and are excreted without increasing GMBF. The blood vessels of the submucosa are not drawn to scale. SNAC, S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine; NO, nitric oxide.
Figure 7.
Scheme of the major pathways involved in the vasodilation action of SNAC on the gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) compared to nitrite (NO2−) and nitrate (NO3−) anions. Orally or luminally administered SNAC spontaneously releases NO into the stomach lumen. Free NO diffuses through the gastric mucosa into the submucosal blood vessels, where it increases GMBF. Intact SNAC molecules may also diffuse through the gastric mucosa into the submucosal blood vessels, where in situ NO release may lead to vasodilation. At neutral pH, NO2− and NO3− anions from oral or luminal sources diffuse to the submucosal blood vessels where they contribute to NO-derived NO2− and NO3− levels and are excreted without increasing GMBF. The blood vessels of the submucosa are not drawn to scale. SNAC, S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine; NO, nitric oxide.