Next Article in Journal
Cell Suspension Culture of Eriobotrya japonica Regulates the Diabetic and Hyperlipidemic Signs of High-Fat-Fed Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Photo-Induced Cycloaddition Reactions of α-Diketones and Transformations of the Photocycloadducts
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis, Antibacterial and Antifungal Activity of Some New Pyrazoline and Pyrazole Derivatives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diastereoselective [2+2] Photocycloaddition of Chiral Cyclic Enones with Olefins in Aqueous Media Using Surfactants
Article Menu

Export Article

Molecules 2013, 18(3), 2712-2725; doi:10.3390/molecules18032712

Singlet Oxygen in Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: Photosensitizer-Dependent Production and Decay in E. coli
Grup d'Enginyeria Molecular, Institut Químic de Sarrià, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona E-08017, Spain
Center for Biodiversity, Functional & Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon 1749-016, Portugal
Department of Genetics, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon 1649-016, Portugal
Departamento de Quimica, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra P-3049535, Portugal
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 25 January 2013; in revised form: 19 February 2013 / Accepted: 21 February 2013 / Published: 28 February 2013


Several families of photosensitizers are currently being scrutinized for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy applications. Differences in physical and photochemical properties can lead to different localization patterns as well as differences in singlet oxygen production and decay when the photosensitizers are taken up by bacterial cells. We have examined the production and fate of singlet oxygen in Escherichia coli upon photosensitization with three structurally-different cationic photosensitizers, namely New Methylene Blue N (NMB), a member of the phenothiazine family, ACS268, a hydrophobic porphyrin with a single cationic alkyl chain, and zinc(II)-tetramethyltetrapyridinoporphyrazinium salt, a phthalocyanine-like photosensitizer with four positive charges on the macrocycle core. The kinetics of singlet oxygen production and decay indicate different localization for the three photosensitizers, whereby NMB appears to localize in an aqueous-like microenvironment, whereas ACS268 localizes in an oxygen-shielded site, highly reactive towards singlet oxygen. The tetracationic zinc(II) tetrapyridinoporphyrazine is extensively aggregated in the bacteria and fails to produce any detectable singlet oxygen.
antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; cationic photosensitizers; E. coli; kinetics; photodynamic inactivation; singlet oxygen; time-resolved near-IR spectroscopy

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) [1] has been shown as a viable alternative to the use of antibiotics against microbial pathogens, even to those that have developed resistance [2,3]. Briefly, the combination of a drug, usually referred to as the photosensitizer (PS), light and molecular oxygen leads to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), via electron or energy transfer (type I or type II reactions, respectively) from the triplet excited-state of the PS to molecular oxygen [4].
Many different PSs have been used over the years as antimicrobial agents in APDT [5,6]. Nowadays, the most effective ones are cationic at physiological pH, e.g., phenothiazines, porphyrins and phthalocyanines [7,8,9]. These PSs exhibit high efficiency against microbial cells, especially against Gram-negative bacteria, due to the negative net charge found in the microbial cell walls of the latter [10,11,12].
In a previous study we reported how, by means of a combination of spectroscopic and time-resolved photophysical techniques, it is possible to understand where the PS localizes and how singlet oxygen (1O2), one of the reactive oxygen species that plays a major role in APDT [13], is produced and reacts with oxidizable biomolecules in its nearest environment. In that case, tetra-N-methylpyridylporphyrin (TMPyP) was used as a model, demonstrating a double localization both inside and outside the cell, and the ability of 1O2 to cross the cell wall and react with the external aqueous media [14].
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the photosensitizers used in the study: NMB: New Methylene Blue N; ZnTMPyPz: zinc tetramethyltetrapyridino[3,4-b:39,49-g:30,40-l:3-,4-q]porphyrazinium salt; ACS268: 5,10,15-tris(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-20-[N-(12-trimethyl ammonium chloride)-dodecyl-p-sulphonamidophenyl]porphyrin.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the photosensitizers used in the study: NMB: New Methylene Blue N; ZnTMPyPz: zinc tetramethyltetrapyridino[3,4-b:39,49-g:30,40-l:3-,4-q]porphyrazinium salt; ACS268: 5,10,15-tris(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-20-[N-(12-trimethyl ammonium chloride)-dodecyl-p-sulphonamidophenyl]porphyrin.
Molecules 18 02712 g001
In this paper we report the differences in the kinetics of 1O2 production and decay in Escherichia coli upon photosensitization with three different cationic PSs chosen as representative members of the aforementioned families, i.e., the phenothiazine New Methylene Blue N (NMB), a hydrophobic porphyrin with a cationic alkyl chain (ACS268), and a tetracationic zinc(II) pyridine-porphyrazine, namely zinc(II) tetramethyltetrapyridino[3,4-b:39,49-g:30,40-l:3-,4-q]porphyrazinium salt (ZnTMPyPz) (Figure 1). NMB and ZnTMPyPz are efficient antimicrobial photodynamic agents in vitro [15,16,17,18], whereas ACS268 is inactive against E. coli, although it shows some activity against S. aureus.
Aside from their cationic charges, each PS possesses different physical, chemical, and photophysical properties [6]. These variations should likely lead to a different PS localization and therefore, to a different microenvironment. It may therefore be insightful to study the details of 1O2 photosensitization by different PSs to better understand the structure-activity relationships of different families of PS.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. PSs Binding to E. coli

The uptake of NMB and ACS268 was studied by treating the cells with NaOH 0.1 M/1% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) in order to extract the cell-bound PSs and analysing the cell lysates by fluorescence spectroscopy. Bulk concentrations of 10 µM and 7.5 µM were used, respectively. While the uptake of ACS268 reaches a plateau value after only 1 h, the uptake of NMB requires ca. 20 h for completion (see Supplementary Information). For ZnTMPyPz we adopted the uptake conditions described by Dupouy et al. [15], namely 30 min contact time at 37 °C and 10 µM bulk concentration.
It was critical in our experiments to eliminate any PS molecule from the external aqueous buffer in order to ensure that all the spectroscopic data was related to cell-bound molecules. Therefore, to unmistakably assign the spectroscopic data, the external aqueous solutions were routinely tested before and after the in vitro measurements, providing no significant signal in all cases.
The absorption spectrum of NMB bound to E. coli showed a red-shift of 8 nm relative to that in the buffer (Figure 2A), as well as a slight change in the relative amplitudes of the band and the shoulder. However, no significant change was observed in the fluorescence emission spectrum (Figure 2B). For ZnTMPyPz, the absorption spectra both in E. coli and buffer showed a similar structureless broad-band distinct from the spectrum obtained in DMF, where it is in a monomeric form (Figure 2C). A 5 nm red shift was observed in the fluorescence spectrum relative to that in DMF (Figure 2D). For ACS268, the absorption spectrum in E. coli showed a 7 nm red shift relative to that in buffer (Figure 2E). The fluorescence spectra in E. coli and buffer showed similar structures but with a 5 nm red shift (Figure 2F).
Time-resolved fluorescence measurements provided additional insight on the uptake of the PSs (see Electronic Supplementary Information). The fluorescence of NMB at 657 nm decayed with first-order kinetics with a lifetime of 0.5 ± 0.1 ns both in E. coli and in buffer. The fluorescence decay of ZnTMPyPZz in E. coli at 675 was also fitted with a single exponential function with a lifetime of 2.8 ± 0.5 ns. An additional exponential term was necessary to fit the data in buffer, namely with a lifetime of 0.5 ± 0.1 ns. Time-resolved fluorescence of ACS268 was inconclusive as the kinetics in solution was too complex to be fitted by any standard model.
Figure 2. (A,C,E) Absorption and (B,D,F) fluorescence spectra of: (A,B) New Methylene Blue N in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), 1% SDS in 0.1 M NaOH (dotted line). (C,D) ZnTMPyPz in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), DMF (dotted line). (E,F) ACS268 in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), DMF (dotted line).
Figure 2. (A,C,E) Absorption and (B,D,F) fluorescence spectra of: (A,B) New Methylene Blue N in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), 1% SDS in 0.1 M NaOH (dotted line). (C,D) ZnTMPyPz in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), DMF (dotted line). (E,F) ACS268 in E. coli (solid line), PBS (dashed line), DMF (dotted line).
Molecules 18 02712 g002

2.2. Singlet Oxygen Kinetics in E. coli Cells with NMB as PS

Pulsed-laser irradiation of NMB-loaded E. coli cells (30 min contact time; 10 μM NMB bulk concentration) suspended in buffer at pH 7.4 produced clear time-resolved 1O2 phosphorescence signals at 1,270 nm (Figure 3). The contact time between the NMB solution and the bacteria had no effect on the 1O2 luminescence kinetics. In PBS, the signals grew with a time constant of τ1PBS = 2.5 ± 1 μs, and decayed monoexponentially with a lifetime τ2PBS = 3.7 ± 1 μs. In deuterated-PBS (D-PBS), the signal rise remained unchanged with a lifetime τ1D−PBS = 2.5 ± 1 μs, but it decayed more slowly, with a time constant of τ2D−PBS = 65 ± 2 μs. Addition of 0.75 mM bovine serum albumin (BSA), a 1O2 quencher that is not able to cross the cell wall due to its size [19], clearly modified the signal: the rise of the phosphorescence was now complete within the time resolution of our set-up, and the decay was also faster with lifetime τ1BSA = 7.0 ± 1 μs. Saturation of this suspension with oxygen led to a further decrease of the decay lifetime to τ1BSA,O2 = 3.5 ± 1 μs. Finally, measurements in E. coli spheroplasts, i.e., bacteria from which the cell wall had been almost completely removed, led to a 4-fold decrease in the 1O2 phosphorescence signal intensity, but with the same kinetics as in intact cells (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 3. Singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm using NMB as photosensitizer in (A) E. coli/PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (B) E. coli/D-PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (C) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in air-saturated atmosphere. (D) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in oxygen-saturated atmosphere.
Figure 3. Singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm using NMB as photosensitizer in (A) E. coli/PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (B) E. coli/D-PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (C) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in air-saturated atmosphere. (D) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in oxygen-saturated atmosphere.
Molecules 18 02712 g003

2.3. Singlet Oxygen Kinetics in E. coli Cells with ZnTMPyPz as PS

Although ZnTMPyPz is a potent 1O2 photosensitizer in solution [20], irradiation of ZnTMPyPz-loaded E. coli cells suspended in D-PBS did not produce any clear time-resolved 1O2 phosphorescence signal at 1,270 nm (see Supplementary Information). Neither a higher contact time of ZnTMPyPz (3 h), nor a higher acquisition time of the 1O2 phosphorescence signal (12 million laser pulses) produced any detectable signal.

2.4. Singlet Oxygen Kinetics in E. coli Cells with ACS268 as PS

The quantum yield of singlet oxygen production (ΦΔ) of ACS268 was measured in two different solvents, DMF and D2O, by comparison of the signal produced by optically-matched solutions of reference PSs (phenalenone and TMPyP) [21] with that produced by ACS268. The detailed procedure is described in the Supplementary Information. Thus, ΦΔ values of 0.87 ± 0.01 and 0.04 ± 0.01 were determined in DMF and D2O, respectively. Irradiation of ACS268-loaded E. coli cells produced time-resolved 1O2 phosphorescence signals clearly different from those observed for NMB (Figure 4). In PBS, the signals grew with a time constant of τ1PBS = 2.1 ± 1 μs, and decayed biexponentially with lifetimes τ2PBS = 8.6 ± 1 μs and τ3PBS = 34.1 ± 1 μs. In D-PBS, the rise of the signal was slightly slower, τ1D−PBS = 5.2 ± 1 μs, but the decay kinetics remained unchanged biexponential. Addition of 0.75 mM of BSA shortened only the slowest decay lifetime, i.e., τ2BSA = 8.6 ± 1 μs and τ3BSA = 34.0 ± 1 μs. Finally, measurements in E. coli spheroplasts led to a 3-fold decrease in the 1O2 phosphorescence signal intensity, but with the same kinetics as in intact cells (see Supplementary Information).
Figure 4. Singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm using ACS268 as photosensitizer in (A) E. coli/PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (B) E. coli/D-PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (C) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in air-saturated atmosphere.
Figure 4. Singlet oxygen phosphorescence at 1270 nm using ACS268 as photosensitizer in (A) E. coli/PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (B) E. coli/D-PBS in air-saturated atmosphere, (C) E. coli/D-PBS + 0.75 mM BSA in air-saturated atmosphere.
Molecules 18 02712 g004

2.5. Discussion

The main goal of this study was to gain insight into the kinetics of 1O2 production and decay by three different photosensitizers in E. coli cells, thereby shedding light on the mechanism of photodynamic inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria. Specifically, we were interested to learn whether representative members of three different families of photosensitizers would provide different photosensitization kinetics.
Towards this goal, it was first essential to obtain unambiguous time-resolved 1O2 phosphorescence signals from viable cells, i.e., (1) to reduce to a minimum the acquisition time as the 1O2 kinetics in cells changes with increasing light exposure [22,23], and (2) to identify the optimal concentration and contact time of each PS for efficient cell binding/uptake. A concentration ca. 10 μM, similar to those used in inactivation experiments for E. coli [15,24], and a 30 min contact time, typical in APDT [25,26], proved adequate in this respect notwithstanding the higher amount of NMB taken up at longer contact times (Figure 2). Under similar experimental conditions, all these PSs show no significant dark toxicity [15,17].
In homogeneous environments, the 1O2 signals can be appropriately described by Equation (1), where S0 is a quantity proportional to the amount of 1O2 formed upon pulse excitation, τT is the lifetime of the PS’s triplet-excited state, and τΔ is the 1O2 lifetime. Thus, the signal is expected to show two monoexponential components, corresponding to the rise and decay of the signal:
Molecules 18 02712 i001
In microheterogeneous environments it is often found that different populations the PS’s triplet-excited state and 1O2 exist and therefore Equation (1) must be expanded to account for such different populations Equation (2). In such cases the rise and the decay of the signals follow multiexponential laws, the number of exponentials representing the number of independent populations.
Molecules 18 02712 i002
The kinetic models may be even more complex due to phenomena such as diffusion or cross-talk between the different populations.
Regarding the phenothiazine group, NMB was chosen as the model due to its highest singlet oxygen quantum yield and higher hydrophobicity [27], as well as its ability to properly inactivate many bacterial species [27]. Two major changes can be observed in the absorption spectrum of NMB upon binding to E. coli: on one hand, the relative contribution of the shoulder at 600 nm increases, which is consistent with the report by Usacheva et al. [28] that phenothiazine dyes tend to dimerize in the presence of bacteria. On the other, the band maximum shows a slight red shift that reveals a change in the NMB’s microenvironment [29]. Somewhat surprisingly, such microenvironmental changes have no effect on the fluorescence spectrum or in the fluorescence lifetime. The fact that there is no change in the fluorescence lifetime indicates that, despite the different microenvironment, NMB is still surrounded by water molecules (see Supplementary Information). This conclusion is supported by the 1O2 phosphorescence formation and decay kinetics. Both in PBS and D-PBS, the lifetimes obtained for the 1O2 phosphorescence signal matched those obtained in neat H2O or D2O, a 2.5 μs rise component assigned to the triplet state of NMB, and a 3.7 or 65 μs component due to 1O2, respectively. This indicates that NMB is localized in an aqueous-like environment and that 1O2 is deactivated mainly by interactions with H2O or D2O [30]. Of course, it cannot be excluded that another fraction of 1O2 molecules reacts with or is quenched by cell components so rapidly that it does not contribute to the observed signal. Care was taken to ensure that the signals did not originate on NMB molecules that have leaked into the bulk solution during the experiments. The supernatant solution was checked before and after the experiments and in all cases we could find no signal. Addition of BSA to the D2O suspensions significantly changed the signal kinetics, causing both a faster rise (<1 μs) and a faster decay (lifetime of 7 μs) in air-saturated suspensions. The latter component was decreased further to 3.5 μs upon bubbling with oxygen, which increased five-fold the concentration of oxygen in the system. These results suggest a dual effect of BSA: on one hand it quenches 1O2 as one would expect [19] decreasing its lifetime below the time resolution of our setup; on the other, it interacts with NMB shielding it from oxygen [31], which effectively increases the triplet NMB lifetime from 2.5 μs to 7 μs (in air) or 3.5 μs (under oxygen) as the bimolecular energy transfer process is slowed down. Therefore, NMB must be located somewhere in the external structure of the cell wall, accessible to BSA, or must be able to relocate and bind to BSA upon its addition to the solution. This conclusion is consistent with Usacheva’s et al. report that phenothiazinium dyes interact with the outer-wall bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) [32,33]. Overall, our results are in line with the report that an initial population of 104 CFU·mL−1 of E. coli could be totally eliminated by a minimum lethal concentration of 7.8 μM NMB at a light fluence of 3.15 J cm−2 [17]. Thus the suggestion that 1O2 plays an important role in the mechanism of action of NMB [17] is supported by our spectroscopic data.
Concerning the phthalocyanine family, ZnTMPyPz was chosen as a model since Dupouy et al. [15] had shown that, using the same uptake conditions as in this work, irradiation with visible light reduced the cell viability by 99.5%. These results can now be rationalized in the light of our findings: First, as observed in the absorption spectrum (Figure 2C), ZnTMPyPz is largely aggregated in E. coli as deduced from the broadening of the bands relative to DMF. This aggregation would explain why no signal is observed in the 1O2 luminescence experiments under conditions similar to those used for the other PSs, even increasing the contact time and the acquisition time. Spesia et al. showed that alterations in the cell membrane appear to be the major cause of E. coli inactivation upon APDT with visible light and a tetracationic zinc(II) phthalocyanine derivative (ZnPc4+) [34]. Assuming that (1) ZnTMPyPz and ZnPc4+ localize in a similar microenvironment because of the structural similarity, and that (2) ZnTMPyPz is basically aggregated like in an aqueous media, as observed by the absorption spectrum and the absence of 1O2 luminescence signal, a localization to the outer structure of the cell wall, comparable to the one obtained with NMB, is tentatively attributed. This conclusion is not contradictory to the 99.5% reduction in cell viability, as there is still a small quantity of monomer, detectable by steady-state (Figure 2D) and time-resolved (Figure S3; see the Supplementary Information) fluorescence measurements, that could be responsible for the production of ROS and the resulting photodynamic effect shown by ZnTMPyPz.
We previously demonstrated that a tetracationic porphyrin such as TMPyP, with the cationic charges peripherally-distributed, localizes in E. coli at two different sites: (1) externally bound to the cell wall, probably in a similar localization as NMB and ZnTMPyPz, and (2) inside the cell, bound to nucleic acids [14]. We hypothesize that ACS268, which has a unique cationic charge in the alkyl chain, would localize in a completely different environment than TMPyP, as the cationic charge is far away from the photoactive core and the lipophilicity/hydrophilicity of the molecule is completely different. The totally different ΦΔ values in DMF and D2O clearly demonstrate that ACS268 is able to produce 1O2 only when it is in monomeric form.
Both the spectroscopic measurements and the 1O2 phosphorescence in E. coli are in agreement with the aforementioned hypothesis. The red shift observed in the absorption and fluorescence spectra in E. coli indicates a different environment surrounding the PS relative to that in solution [29,35,36].
With ACS268, two components with lifetimes 8.6 μs and 34 μs are observed in the 1O2 phosphorescence experiments in PBS, D-PBS and upon addition of BSA. The presence of two lifetimes suggests two different localizations for ACS268 in E. coli., likely in the cell wall as deduced from the 3-fold decrease in the 1O2 phosphorescence signal intensity observed in spheroplasts. Both ACS268 populations are clearly shielded from oxygen as evidenced by the long triplet lifetimes as compared to the 2.5 μs found for NMB. This in turn indicates that only a minor fraction of triplets is quenched by oxygen and therefore that the amount of 1O2 produced by ACS269 in the cells must be very low. Moreover, the τΔ values for 1O2 in E. coli are significantly shorter (2.1 μs in PBS; 5.2 μs in D-PBS suspensions) than the ones observed in buffer (3.5 μs in PBS; 67 μs in D-PBS) [30] indicating a fast deactivation of 1O2 by quenchers surrounding the PS molecules that, however, does not lead to cell death. The inefficient production of singlet oxygen and its fast deactivation are consistent with the very low photodynamic activity found for this compound against E. coli (this work, data not shown).
The rate constant of 1O2 decay in microheterogeneous systems under exchange equilibrium conditions, kd, is described by Equation (3) [37]:
Molecules 18 02712 i003
where Keq = [1O2]cell/[1O2]water is the partition equilibrium of 1O2 between the two phases, fm and (1-fm) are the volume fractions of the cell and aqueous phase, respectively, and kd,cell and kd,water are the decay rate constants inside and outside the cell, respectively. Assuming Keq ≈ 1 and fm ≈ 0.0012 for our suspensions in 5 × 108 CFU/mL, the lifetime of 1O2 within the bacterial cell can be estimated as τΔ,cell ≈ 7 ns, a value that would perfectly correlate with the 1O2 phosphorescence kinetics observed upon addition of BSA, which traps any 1O2 molecule escaping from the cell wall into the external aqueous media.
It has previously been demonstrated that the presence of external proteins clearly modifies the effectiveness of APDT to inactivate microbial cells [38,39,40]. Such effect can also be observed in the kinetics of 1O2 in the presence of BSA. The addition of BSA clearly modifies the 1O2 phosphorescence signal produced by NMB, decreasing τΔ and increasing τT, demonstrating an interaction between NMB and BSA (Figure 3). However, the effect is barely observed when ACS268 is used as the PS (Figure 4), suggesting a deeper localization of ACS268 into the cell wall, thereby making it less accessible to BSA.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemicals

New Methylene Blue N (NMB) was supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Zinc-tetramethyltetrapyridino[3,4-b:39,49-g:30,40-l:3-,4-q]porphyrazinium salt (ZnTMPyPz) was synthesized as described by Marti et al. [20]. 5,10,15-tris(2,6-Dichlorophenyl)-20-[N-(12-trimethylammonium chloride)-dodecyl-p-sulphonamidophenyl]porphyrin (ACS268) was synthesized as described in the Supplementary Information. Deuterium oxide (D2O, >99.9%) and dimethylformamide were purchased from Solvents Documentation Synthesis (Peypin, France). Bovine serum albumin (98%), lysozyme, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), trizma, and Dubelcco’s phosphate buffered saline (PBS) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Saccarose and ethylendiamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) were supplied by Panreac S.A. (Barcelona, Spain). Deuterated PBS (D-PBS) was prepared by dissolving PBS powder in D2O instead of H2O.

3.2. Bacterial Growth

Escherichia coli CECT101 was grown overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) media, then transferred into new LB media to obtain an initial optical density value of 0.1 per cm at 660 nm, and allowed to grow aerobically at 37 °C. Cells in the middle logarithmic phase (optical density 0.35 per cm at 660 nm) were harvested by centrifugation (10 min, 3,000 rpm) and then resuspended in sterile PBS at pH 7.4. The procedure was repeated three times, yielding a bacterial concentration of 108 colony forming units (CFU) mL−1, as assessed by serial dilutions of the cell suspension followed by a colony formation assay.

3.3. PS Binding to E. coli

The bacterial uptake of PS was determined by fluorescence spectroscopy following the procedure described by Hamblin et al. [26,41]. Bacterial suspensions (108 CFU·mL−1) were incubated in the dark at room temperature (NMB, ACS268) or at 37 °C (ZnTMPyPz) with varying concentrations of PS and contact times under gentle stirring. Afterwards, the cells were washed by centrifugation (10 min, 3,000 rpm, 3 times) to remove any excess of PS. After the last centrifugation, a solution of 1% SDS in 0.1 M NaOH was added to the pellets and shaken for a minimum of 24 h. Each experiment was repeated three times. Stock PS solutions were sterilized by filtration through a 0.22 µm sterile filter and stored in the dark at 4 °C for a maximum of 1 week.

3.4. Spheroplasts Formation

Spheroplasts were obtained by resuspending treated or untreated E. coli cells in Tris-HCl 0.05 M buffer at pH = 6.8 containing 0.01 M EDTA, 0.3 M sucrose and lysozyme (1 mg mL−1) under stirring. After 1 h incubation at 37 °C, tubes were centrifuged twice at 2,000 rpm for 10 min [42]. The pellet was then resuspended in PBS solution at pH = 7.4. PS-loaded spheroplasts were obtained by first incubating whole E. coli cells with the PS and then subjecting them to the procedure above.

3.5. General Spectroscopic Measurements

Absorption spectra were recorded on a Cary 4E spectrophotometer (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with a 110 mm diameter integrating sphere and high performance photomultiplier tube for transmittance measurements. Fluorescence emission spectra were recorded in a Spex Fluoromax-2 spectrofluorometer (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Edison, NJ, USA). Fluorescence decays were recorded with a time-correlated single photon counting system (Fluotime 200, PicoQuant GmbH, Berlin, Germany) equipped with a red sensitive photomultiplier. Excitation was achieved by means of a 375 nm picosecond diode laser, or a 596 or 657 nm LED working at 10 MHz repetition rate. The counting frequency was always below 1%. Fluorescence decays were analysed using the PicoQuant FluoFit 4.0 data analysis software.

3.6. Time-Resolved Singlet Oxygen Measurements

1O2 phosphorescence detected by means of a customized PicoQuant Fluotime 200 system described in detail elsewhere [43]. Briefly, a diode-pumped pulsed Nd:Yag laser (FTSS355-Q, Crystal Laser, Berlin, Germany) working at 10 kHz repetition rate at 532 nm (12 mW, 1.2 μJ per pulse) was used for excitation. A 1,064 nm rugate notch filter (Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ, USA) was placed at the exit port of the laser to remove any residual component of its fundamental emission in the near-IR region. The luminescence exiting from the side of the sample was filtered by a cold mirror (CVI Melles Griot, Albuquerque, NM, USA) to remove any scattered laser radiation, and focused on the entrance slit of a Science Tech 9055 dual grating monochromator. A near-IR sensitive photomultiplier tube assembly (H9170-45, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu City, Japan) was used as detector at the exit port of the monochromator. Photon counting was achieved with a multichannel scaler (Becker&Hickl MSA 300 or PicoQuant’s Nanoharp 250). The system is similar to that used in other laboratories [44]. Time-resolved 1O2 signals were analysed by fitting either Equation (1) or (2) to the data using the FluoFit software. The lifetime values quoted throughout the manuscript refer to mean and standard deviation values derived from at least three independent measurements. All spectroscopic measurements were carried out in 1-cm quartz cuvettes (Hellma, Müllheim, Germany) at room temperature.

3.7. Measurements in Bacterial Suspensions

In a typical experiment, bacterial suspensions were incubated in the dark with the desired amount of PS for a given period of time. The cells were then washed three times with PBS and resuspended in PBS to a final concentration of ~5 × 108 CFU·mL−1. For time-resolved phosphorescence measurements, the bacterial suspensions (3 mL) were irradiated with 3 million laser pulses at 532 nm. The suspensions were gently stirred during the measurements. Appropriate controls were performed to ensure that the signals originated from PS molecules bound to the bacterial cells (see Supplementary Information).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that, between the different families used in the study, there are remarkable differences in (1) the microenvironment surrounding the PSs, i.e., in their localization, and (2) the kinetics of production and decay of 1O2. When bound to E. coli, NMB localizes in an aqueous-like microenvironment, accessible to external proteins such as BSA and interacting with the LPS in cell-wall, ZnTMPyPz might localize similarly to NMB, where it is almost completely aggregated, and ACS268 localizes in a deeper position of the external structure of the cell wall, namely in the outer membrane, shielded from oxygen as demonstrated with the triplet lifetimes. With regards to the initial location of 1O2 produced by the PSs, 1O2 generated by NMB can move freely within the cell being mainly deactivated by the aqueous phase, while a completely different scenario is observed for ACS268, suggesting that 1O2 cannot escape freely from its primary site of production, and thus partially reacts with proximate cellular components. On the other hand, ZnTMPyPz did not show 1O2-luminescence under conditions similar to those used for the others PSs, correlating with the lower photodynamic inactivation effect observed. Finally, the correlation between the spectroscopic results and the antimicrobial activity shown by these different photosensitizers indicates that the time-resolved monitoring of 1O2 phosphorescence is a convenient tool to assess the efficiency of antimicrobial photodynamic treatments.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be accessed at:


This work was supported by grants of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (CTQ2007-67763-C03-01/ BQU and CTQ2010-20870-C03-01). We also thank Chymiotechnon, Portugal, for financial and technical support. X.R. thanks the Generalitat de Catalunya and Fons Social Europeu for a predoctoral fellowship. X.H. thanks the support of MIT International Science and Technology Initiative Spain that made her involvement in this research possible. We are also indebted to T. Torres for providing us with a sample of the ZnTMPyPz compound.


  1. Jori, G.; Fabris, C.; Soncin, M.; Ferro, S.; Coppellotti, O.; Dei, D.; Fantetti, L.; Chiti, G.; Roncucci, G. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of microbial infections: Basic principles and perspective applications. Lasers Surg. Med. 2006, 38, 468–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dai, T.; Huang, Y.Y.; Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic therapy for localized infections—State of the art. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2009, 6, 170–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wainwright, M. Photoantimicrobials—So what’s stopping us? Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 2009, 6, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schweitzer, C.; Schmidt, R. Physical mechanisms of generation and deactivation of singlet oxygen. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1685–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Garland, M.J.; Cassidy, C.M.; Woolfson, D.; Donnelly, R.F. Designing photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: Strategies, challenges and promising developments. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 667–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wainwright, M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1998, 42, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bertoloni, G.; Rossi, F.; Valduga, G.; Jori, G.; Ali, H.; Vanlier, J.E. Photosensitizing activity of water-soluble and lipid-soluble phthalocyanines on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbial-cells. Microbios 1992, 71, 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nitzan, Y.; Gutterman, M.; Malik, Z.; Ehrenberg, B. Inactivation of gram-negative bacteria by photosensitized porphyrins. Photochem. Photobiol. 1992, 55, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romanova, N.A.; Brovko, L.Y.; Moore, L.; Pometun, E.; Savitsky, A.P.; Ugarova, N.N.; Griffiths, M.W. Assessment of photodynamic destruction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes by using ATP bioluminescence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6393–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Merchat, M.; Bertolini, G.; Giacomini, P.; Villanueva, A.; Jori, G. Meso-substituted cationic porphyrins as efficient photosensitizers of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1996, 32, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Minnock, A.; Vernon, D.I.; Schofield, J.; Griffiths, J.; Parish, J.H.; Brown, S.B. Photoinactivation of bacteria. Use of a cationic water-soluble zinc phthalocyanine to photoinactivate both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1996, 32, 159–164. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wainwright, M.; Phoenix, D.A.; Marland, J.; Wareing, D.R.A.; Bolton, F.J. A study of photobactericidal activity in the phenothiazinium series. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1997, 19, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ergaieg, K.; Chevanne, M.; Cillard, J.; Seux, R. Involvement of both type I and type II mechanisms in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria photosensitization by a meso-substituted cationic porphyrin. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ragàs, X.; Agut, M.; Nonell, S. Singlet oxygen in E. coli: New insights for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 49, 770–776. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dupouy, E.A.; Lazzeri, D.; Durantini, E.N. Photodynamic activity of cationic and non-charged Zn(II) tetrapyridinoporphyrazine derivatives: Biological consequences in human erythrocytes and Escherichia coli. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2004, 3, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Peleg, A.Y. Optimizing therapy for Acinetobacter baumannii. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 28, 662–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phoenix, D.A.; Sayed, Z.; Hussain, S.; Harris, F.; Wainwright, M. The phototoxicity of phenothiazinium derivatives against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 39, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ragàs, X.; Dai, T.; Tegos, G.P.; Agut, M.; Nonell, S.; Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic inactivation of Acinetobacter baumannii using phenothiazinium dyes: In vitro and in vivo studies. Lasers Surg. Med. 2010, 42, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Snyder, J.W.; Skovsen, E.; Lambert, J.D.C.; Ogilby, P.R. Subcellular, time-resolved studies of singlet oxygen in single cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14558–14559. [Google Scholar]
  20. Martí, C.; Nonell, S.; Nicolau, M.; Torres, T. Photophysical properties of neutral and cationic tetrapyridinoporphyrazines. Photochem. Photobiol. 2000, 71, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Redmond, R.W.; Gamlin, J.N. A compilation of singlet oxygen yields from biologically relevant molecules. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999, 70, 391–475. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kuimova, M.K.; Botchway, S.W.; Parker, A.W.; Balaz, M.; Collins, H.A.; Anderson, H.L.; Suhling, K.; Ogilby, P.R. Imaging intracellular viscosity of a single cell during photoinduced cell death. Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schlothauer, J.; Hackbarth, S.; Roder, B. A new benchmark for time-resolved detection of singlet oxygen luminescence—Revealing the evolution of lifetime in living cells with low dose illumination. Laser Phys. Lett. 2009, 6, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Harris, F.; Chatfield, L.K.; Phoenix, D.A. Phenothiazinium based photosensitisers—Photodynamic agents with a multiplicity of cellular targets and clinical applications. Curr. Drug Targets 2005, 6, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Caminos, D.A.; Spesia, M.B.; Durantini, E.N. Photodynamic inactivation of Escherichia coli by novel meso-substituted porphyrins by 4-(3-N,N,N-trimethylammoniumpropoxy)phenyl and 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl groups. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2006, 5, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hamblin, M.R.; O’Donnell, D.A.; Murthy, N.; Rajagopalan, K.; Michaud, N.; Sherwood, M.E.; Hasan, T. Polycationic photosensitizer conjugates: Effects of chain length and gram classification on the photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Phoenix, D.A.; Harris, F. Phenothiazinium-based photosensitizers: Antibacterials of the future? Trends Mol. Med. 2003, 9, 283–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Usacheva, M.N.; Teichert, M.C.; Biel, M.A. The role of the methylene blue and toluidine blue monomers and dimers in the photoinactivation of bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2003, 71, 87–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chirvony, V.S. Primary photoprocesses in cationic 5,10,15,20-meso-tetrakis(4-N-methylpyridiniumyl)porphyrin and its transition metal complexes bound with nucleic acids. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2003, 7, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rodgers, M.A.J. Solvent-induced deactivation of singlet oxygen—Additivity relationships in non-aromatic solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6201–6205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Borissevitch, I.E.; Tominaga, T.T.; Schmitt, C.C. Photophysical studies on the interaction of two water-soluble porphyrins with bovine serum albumin. Effects upon the porphyrin triplet state characteristics. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 1998, 114, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Usacheva, M.N.; Teichert, M.C.; Biel, M.A. The interaction of lipopolysaccharides with phenothiazine dyes. Lasers Surg. Med. 2003, 33, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Usacheva, M.N.; Teichert, M.C.; Sievert, C.E.; Biel, M.A. Effect of Ca2+ on the photobactericidal efficacy of methylene blue and toluidine blue against gram-negative bacteria and the dye affinity for lipopolysaccharides. Lasers Surg. Med. 2006, 38, 946–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Spesia, M.B.; Caminos, D.A.; Pons, P.; Durantini, E.N. Mechanistic insight of the photodynamic inactivation of Escherichia coli by a tetracationic zinc(II) phthalocyanine derivative. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2009, 6, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Paoli, V.M.; de Paoli, S.H.; Borissevitch, L.E.; Tedesco, A.C. Fluorescence lifetime and quantum yield of TMPyPH2 associated with micelles and DNA. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 344, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, S.; Lee, Y.A.; Lee, H.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, S.K. Rotation of periphery methylpyridine of meso-tetrakis(n-N-methylpyridiniumyl)porphyrin (n = 2, 3, 4) and its selective binding to native and synthetic DNAs. Biophys. J. 2002, 83, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, P.C.; Rodgers, M.A.J. Singlet molecular-oxygen in micellar systems: Distribution equilibria between hydrophobic and hydrophilic compartments. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 4894–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Demidova, T.N.; Hamblin, M.R. Photodynamic therapy targeted to pathogens. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2004, 17, 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nitzan, Y.; Balzam-Sudakevitz, A.; Ashkenazi, H. Eradication of Acinetobacter baumannii by photosensitized agents in vitro. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1998, 42, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wilson, M.; Pratten, J. Lethal photosensitization of Staphylococcus aureus in-vitro—Effect of growth-phase, serum, and preirradation time. Lasers Surg. Med. 1995, 16, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Demidova, T.N.; Hamblin, M.R. Effect of cell-photo sensitizer binding and cell density on microbial photoinactivation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 2329–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Merchat, M.; Spikes, J.D.; Bertoloni, G.; Jori, G. Studies on the mechanism of bacteria photosensitization by meso-substituted cationic porphyrins. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 1996, 35, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jimenez-Banzo, A.; Ragàs, X.; Kapusta, P.; Nonell, S. Time-resolved methods in biophysics. 7. Photon counting vs. analog time-resolved singlet oxygen phosphorescence detection. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008, 7, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Maisch, T.; Baier, J.; Franz, B.; Maier, M.; Landthaler, M.; Szeimies, R.M.; Bäumler, W. The role of singlet oxygen and oxygen concentration in photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7223–7228. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compound ACS268 is available from the authors.
Molecules EISSN 1420-3049 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top