Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Anti-TMV Activity of Dialkyl/dibenzyl 2-((6-Substituted-benzo[d]thiazol-2-ylamino)(benzofuran-2-yl)methyl) Malonates
Next Article in Special Issue
Gas Phase Thermal Reactions of exo-8-Cyclopropyl-bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene (1-exo)
Previous Article in Journal
Selective G-Quadruplex DNA Recognition by a New Class of Designed Cyanines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Kinetics of Nitric Oxide and Oxygen Gases on Porous Y-Stabilized ZrO2-Based Sensors
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Pressure Dependent Product Formation in the Photochemically Initiated Allyl + Allyl Reaction

Lehrstuhl Thermodynamik/Thermische Verfahrenstechnik, BrandenburgischeTechnische-Universität, Siemens-Halske-Ring 8, Cottbus D-03046, Germany
Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Georg-August-Universität, Tammannstr. 6, Göttingen D-37077, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2013, 18(11), 13608-13622;
Submission received: 27 August 2013 / Revised: 17 October 2013 / Accepted: 22 October 2013 / Published: 4 November 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gas Phase Reactions)


Photochemically driven reactions involving unsaturated radicals produce a thick global layer of organic haze on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. The allyl radical self-reaction is an example for this type of chemistry and was examined at room temperature from an experimental and kinetic modelling perspective. The experiments were performed in a static reactor with a volume of 5 L under wall free conditions. The allyl radicals were produced from laser flash photolysis of three different precursors allyl bromide (C3H5Br), allyl chloride (C3H5Cl), and 1,5-hexadiene (CH2CH(CH2)2CHCH2) at 193 nm. Stable products were identified by their characteristic vibrational modes and quantified using FTIR spectroscopy. In addition to the (re-) combination pathway C3H5+C3H5 → C6H10 we found at low pressures around 1 mbar the highest final product yields for allene and propene for the precursor C3H5Br. A kinetic analysis indicates that the end product formation is influenced by specific reaction kinetics of photochemically activated allyl radicals. Above 10 mbar the (re-) combination pathway becomes dominant. These findings exemplify the specificities of reaction kinetics involving chemically activated species, which for certain conditions cannot be simply deduced from combustion kinetics or atmospheric chemistry on Earth.

1. Introduction

The allyl radical (C3H5) is the smallest π-conjugated radical. Its reactions with other hydrocarbon radicals are a building block for basic kinetic schemes for hydrocarbon combustion and for photochemical models of the planetary atmospheres [1,2,3,4]. Due to its exceptional stability it is often present in significant concentrations in flames and during pyrolysis processes [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Modeling studies show that the knowledge of accurate kinetic data for the reactions of unsaturated C3-species is essential for the description of reactive particle formation processes [4,9,10,12,13].
For assessing the role of the allyl chemistry in complex reactive systems it is crucial to characterize not only the rates of allyl-consuming reactions, but also the product branching in the respective pathways and its pressure dependency. Both the formation of secondary organic aerosols on Earth and the formation of organic haze on Titan were shown to be pressure dependent in laboratory experiments [14,15].
For the reaction of allyl radicals with oxygen atoms the significance of reaction channels via C-C fission was established in the past [10,16,17]. In the present study, we have applied our technique of laser flash photolysis combined with the quantitative detection of reactants and products by FTIR spectroscopy [10,18,19] to the study of the allyl radical self-reaction. Here, the competition between recombination (more correctly combination, however, in the literature recombination is the typical designation) and disproportionation is the focus and the potential influence of radical forming channels as recently reported for the vinyl radical self- reaction [20] at low pressures.
In many earlier studies [21,22,23] the rate of the allyl self-reaction was determined experimentally and recently also theoretically [23,24]. The product formation, however, received less attention until recently. The recombination reaction (1) was found to be the only significant channel going back to an experimental study by James and Kambanis, who reported the disproportionation route yield to be below 1% [25]. This finding was confirmed in recent work including one study with direct product detection at low pressure [26,27,28]. The knowledge about the branching between recombination and disproportionation is important with regard to benzene formation in flames, where many allyl reactions are involved in considered benzene formation pathways [7,9,10,29]. In addition pressure effects have to be taken into account since the nascent allyl radicals, formed by flash photolysis, and hence also the recombination product may be energized and show different reaction pathways at low and high pressures. The two known pathways for the allyl + allyl reaction are listed below:
C3H5 + C3H5→C6H10
C3H5 + C3H5→H2CCCH2 + C3H6
Due to chemical activation of 1,5-hexadienyl formed from activated allyl radicals the reaction pathway (2) may be alternatively represented by the following scheme:
C3H5* + C3H5*[C3H5-C3H5]*→H2CCCH2 + C3H6
The excited transition state indicates in anticipation of our results that the fraction of the disproportionation route may depend on the internal energy of allyl radicals at low pressures.
The objectives of the present study are: (i) the experimental identification of reaction channels in the allyl self-reaction kinetics and the assessment of their relative branching fractions as a function of pressure; (ii) the rationalization of the mechanisms that operate in this type of laser flash photolysis experiments by means of kinetic modeling.

2. Results and Discussion

Product Branching

For studying the formation of the stable products, the allyl radicals were generated by photodecomposition of the precursors allyl chloride, allyl bromide, or 1,5-hexadiene. The pros and cons of the different precursors have been discussed in a previous paper in the context of the allyl + oxygen atom reaction [10] and they are also considered below in the context of the allyl self-reaction. Product spectra were taken in intervals of 50–100 laser shots each up to a total number of 200–400 laser shots. The scanning time for the IR measurements is typically 10 to 20 s (100 scans). The number of laser shots was chosen such that a total precursor conversion of about 10%–15% was achieved. In order to avoid secondary reactions this upper limit was not exceeded in all experiments. The effect of variation of initial precursor concentrations was tested but no measurable influence on the observed product branching was observed.
The IR spectra were analyzed in the spectral range of 3800–600 cm−1 by comparing the product spectra with spectra of the pure substances. For product quantification calibration curves were recorded and determined for all identified compounds at the same temperature 296 ± 1 K and in the pressure range of 0.4–500 mbar. Due to the low molecular mass and the different functional groups (-C-C-, -C≡C-, -C=C-) absorbing in different regions of the IR spectrum, an unambiguous and quantitative calibration of most compounds was possible.
Examples for unequivocal product identification at 4 mbar are given in Figure 1 for the precursor allyl bromide. Here, separate regions of the IR spectra reveal the unambiguous identification of the following stable products: propene (C3H6), allene (H2CCCH2), propyne (HCCCH3), and acetylene (C2H2). We note that 1,5-hexadiene can only be a minor product at 4 mbar for this precursor (see panel (e) of Figure 1). The significant formation of propyne and acetylene is surprising because neither reaction (1) nor (2) produce these species. In addition, the high yield of allene when assigned to reaction (2) is in contrast to previous work [25,26,27,28]. We note that there are species which could not be detected by IR like H2 or which were not identified. However, the carbon mass recoveries for the precursors allyl bromide (85%) and 1,5-hexadiene (95%–100%) indicate that unidentified products come from minor channels. In case of allyl chloride the carbon mass recovery was lower and most of the products, which have not been detected, are Cl substituted species, which belong to the unavoidable Cl atom reaction with the double bond of allyl chloride (see also the Experimental section below).
Figure 1. Product formation in the C3H5 + C3H5 reaction system with C3H5Br as precursor: identification of major products, (a) complete product spectrum, raw data (b) propene, (c) allene, (d) propyne and acetylene; (e) upper limit for 1,5-hexadiene; p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar, (f) detection of CH2CH(CH2)2CHCH2 from precursor C3H5Cl, p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K.
Figure 1. Product formation in the C3H5 + C3H5 reaction system with C3H5Br as precursor: identification of major products, (a) complete product spectrum, raw data (b) propene, (c) allene, (d) propyne and acetylene; (e) upper limit for 1,5-hexadiene; p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar, (f) detection of CH2CH(CH2)2CHCH2 from precursor C3H5Cl, p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K.
Molecules 18 13608 g001
It has been demonstrated in previous studies on hydrocarbon radical reactions with O atoms that the influence of the secondary chemistry can be largely suppressed when high initial radical concentrations are generated in a nanosecond time window by laser photolysis [7,17]. The key point is that the consumption of non-radical primary products, formed in the microsecond time window of the main reaction, and of molecular photolysis products by secondary chemistry is suppressed in this type of experiment with its specific chemistry. Instead, the secondary chemistry is dominated by the faster radical/radical or radical/atom reactions [10,18]. This assumption was validated by kinetic modeling for a specific class of reactions and precursors [18]. In the present study the high product yields of propene, propyne, and allene is an intriguing and unexpected result and the former assumption has to be put to the test. To this end, the use of three different precursors with specific features of their side chemistry as well as the variation of the pressure should provide constraints for plausible mechanistic interpretations. In Table 1 are shown final product yields of propene, propyne, allene, acetylene, and 1,5-hexadiene at 4 mbar in the experiments via the precursors allyl bromide, allyl chloride and 1,5-hexadiene. Figure 2 illustrates the averaging of the product yields by analyzing the product formation at different precursor conversions for the precursor allyl chloride. The yields are given as a function of the precursor consumption; the errors correspond to the estimated errors due to the calibration of product concentration based on their specific IR absorption bands. This error is typically derived from residual absorption features after subtraction of pure substance spectra from the IR product spectrum. For many of the species found in this work the calibration spectra derived in previous work could be used [10,19]. For the larger product 1,5-hexadiene potential spectral interferences with other reaction products implied a higher estimated error compared to the smaller products (see Figure 1e). This uncertainty only applies for the precursor allyl bromide in the low pressure experiments, for which we can only give an upper limit for the channel fraction of 1,5-hexediene (see Table 1). At high pressure and using allyl chloride the assignment is much clearer (see Figure 1f). In [18] a more detailed discussion of the assessment of errors was presented.
Table 1. Experimentally determined final product yields relative to precursor consumption for the C3H5 + C3H5 reaction for different precursors. p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar; p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(CH2CH(CH2)2CHCH2) = 0.4 mbar. p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 298 K.
Table 1. Experimentally determined final product yields relative to precursor consumption for the C3H5 + C3H5 reaction for different precursors. p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar; p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(CH2CH(CH2)2CHCH2) = 0.4 mbar. p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 298 K.
Precursor ProductC3H5BrC3H5Cl1,5-hexadiene
Propene30 ± 5%7 ± 2%80 ± 10%
Propyne10 ± 3%3 ± 1%24 ± 5%
Allene6 ± 2%6 ± l%25 ± 5%
Acetylene15 ± 3%4 ± 1%26 ± 4%
1,5-Hexadiene<5%14 ± 5%
As stated above, at low pressure (4 mbar) surprisingly high yields of propyne and acetylene but also propene and allene were found for all precursors (see Table 1). Therefore, the photolysis induced reaction kinetics are seemingly coupled to photochemistry and secondary chemistry that must be considered for the rationalization of end product formation. We start the discussion with a comparison of the present results to those of a previous study using the precursor 1,5-hexadiene.
Figure 2. The C3H5 + C3H5 reaction: formation of products vs. consumption of the precursor C3H5Cl, p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K.
Figure 2. The C3H5 + C3H5 reaction: formation of products vs. consumption of the precursor C3H5Cl, p(C3H5Cl) = 0.3 mbar; p(total) = 4 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K.
Molecules 18 13608 g002
For the 1,5-hexadiene photolysis, Pilling and co-workers [21] reported two allyl radicals (68%) as the major photolysis products at 193 nm, the formation of propene and allene was identified as the only significant molecular channel with a fraction of 27%. This finding was confirmed recently by Selby et al. [26] reporting 26% for this channel using the propene concentration for calibration. We find a fraction of (25 ± 3%) for this molecular channel based on propene yields relative to consumed 1,5-hexadiene in experiments in which allyl radicals were scavenged by O atoms in the co-photolysis with SO2 [10]. The formation of propyne was not reported, but no comment was given whether allene/propyne could be distinguished in their analysis, which is not trivial using GC [30]. We note that single photon ionization and IR spectroscopy allow their distinction on the basis of the slightly different ionization energies of the two C3H4 species [31] and their characteristic vibrational modes (see Figure 1), respectively. The existence of minor radical producing channels, like CH3 + C5H7 was deduced indirectly by Tulloch et al. [21] from characteristic combination products like 1-C4H8 from the C3H5 + CH3 reaction and observed directly by Selby et al. [26]. However, the potential disproportionation reaction of two allyl radicals and radical forming channels were not taken into account by Pilling and co-workers [21]. This part of their work was focused on establishing 1,5-hexadiene photolysis at 193 nm as a clean source of allyl radicals for studying the rate coefficient of the allyl self-reaction.
We now discuss the allyl chloride photolysis. For this precursor comparatively large fractions of final products were found which potentially belong to the disproportionation route or to yet unknown chemistry in case of propyne and acetylene (see Table 1). It is also obvious from Table 1 that the relative yields vary with the precursor indicating precursor specific effects. In the case of allyl chloride, fast reacting Cl atoms are formed during the photolysis at 193 nm. The competitive reactions of Cl atoms with the precursor, olefinic primary products [32,33,34] and, of course, unsaturated radicals [35] may complicate the stable product analysis as we pointed out previously [10]. Assuming kinetics for the reaction allyl + Cl similar to vinyl + Cl [35], this reaction is roughly two times faster than that of the title reaction [21,23]; Selby et al. estimate this ratio up to a factor of six in favor of allyl + Cl [26]. As a consequence, an enhanced formation of the abstraction product C3H4 compared to C3H6 is expected [35], which was observed in the experiments. The significant dominance of allene over propyne formation in the allyl chloride photolysis experiments suggests that allene is the abstraction product in the allyl + Cl reaction. The comparatively large product yield of 1,5-hexadiene illustrates that allyl radicals are efficiently produced. In total, about 30% of the consumed C3H5Cl reacted via channel (1). This finding is consistent with (1) being the dominant route at 4 mbar. The possible chemical pathways to propene, propyne, and allene (formed from allyl + Cl) is discussed below in detail for the case of allyl bromide photolysis.
Allyl bromide photolysis produces allyl radicals and bromine atoms whose reactions are comparatively slow and do not interfere with the fast radical-radical chemistry [36,37,38]. The only fast reaction here is the re-formation of allyl bromide, which was analyzed in detail by Bedjanian et al. [39]. They did not observe the alternative H atom abstraction channel being discussed above for vinyl + Cl and allyl + Cl reflecting the different reactivity of bromine and chlorine atoms. In their work, the experiments were conducted at room temperature, which is similar to the present study. Based on these considerations allyl bromide photolysis seems to be a suitable precursor for studying product formation in the allyl self-reaction. The same precursor was applied by Selby et al. using flash photolysis at 248 nm [26].
The end product analysis for the laser photolysis of allyl bromide at 4 mbar shows that propene is the major product also for this precursor. Different to allyl chloride photolysis significantly less allene than propyne was formed. This seems to bolster a bit the explanation of the enhanced allene formation by the allyl + chlorine atom reaction. We note that for allyl bromide and allyl chloride allene formation is suppressed close to the detection limit in the co-photolysis with sulfur dioxide (SO2) at 4 mbar, where oxygen atoms were formed in excess over allyl radicals [10]. This finding excludes the possibility that allene is formed from precursor photolysis, which is a central observation with regard to the interpretation of the results of this study.
We further found that less 1,5-hexadiene was formed in the allyl bromide experiments compared to allyl chloride. In the introduction we discussed that chemical activation may enhance allene and propene formation (channel (3)). Nascent allyl radicals being formed from the decomposition allyl bromide are expected to carry significantly more excess energy compared to their generation from allyl chloride since the energy of the C-Cl bond is about 50 kJ/mol higher than the C-Br bond [40]. Therefore, the increased fraction of channel (1) may be the effect of decreased excess energy of the allyl radical produced from allyl chloride photolysis, which is carried through to the recombination product.
To further elucidate the role of chemical activation we analyzed the pressure dependence of product formation for the allyl bromide photolysis. The results are illustrated in Figure 3. We notice that allene together with propene show the highest channel fraction at the lowest pressure of 0.4 mbar and that its formation strongly decreases with increasing pressure; it could not be detected at 100 mbar. A further observation is the increasing product yield of the recombination product with increasing pressure above 10 mbar. These observations indicate that chemical activation indeed strongly affects the product branching in the reaction system prepared by allyl bromide photolysis using 193 nm photons.
Figure 3. Pressure dependent formation of the products 1,5-hexadiene, allene, propene and propyne between 0.4 and 500 mbar. Precursor allyl bromide, p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K. Symbols show experimental data points, lines show the result of a kinetic simulation using the mechanism of Table 2. The initial concentration of allyl radicals (1 × 10−9 mol/cm3) in the simulation was estimated from the photolysis laser fluence and the consumption of allyl bromide per 193 nm excimer laser pulse assuming a quantum yield of 1 for the allyl + bromine atom channel.
Figure 3. Pressure dependent formation of the products 1,5-hexadiene, allene, propene and propyne between 0.4 and 500 mbar. Precursor allyl bromide, p(C3H5Br) = 0.3 mbar, bath gas Ar, T = 296 ± 1 K. Symbols show experimental data points, lines show the result of a kinetic simulation using the mechanism of Table 2. The initial concentration of allyl radicals (1 × 10−9 mol/cm3) in the simulation was estimated from the photolysis laser fluence and the consumption of allyl bromide per 193 nm excimer laser pulse assuming a quantum yield of 1 for the allyl + bromine atom channel.
Molecules 18 13608 g003
Table 2. Kinetic model for the simulation of pressure dependent end product yields, which are shown in Figure 3. Rate constant units are mol/cm3s for bimolecular and s−1 for unimolecular reactions. C6H10 represents 1,5-hexadiene. * indicates reactions of chemically activated species. For some reactions pressure dependent rate coefficients are derived by logarithmic pressure interpolation between the given pressure values.
Table 2. Kinetic model for the simulation of pressure dependent end product yields, which are shown in Figure 3. Rate constant units are mol/cm3s for bimolecular and s−1 for unimolecular reactions. C6H10 represents 1,5-hexadiene. * indicates reactions of chemically activated species. For some reactions pressure dependent rate coefficients are derived by logarithmic pressure interpolation between the given pressure values.
No.ReactionAnEaPressure [bar] or Ref.
1C3H5*→ HCCCH3 + H2.0E020.000.00
2C3H5 + H→C3H61.0E130.000.00
3C6H10*→C3H5* + C3H5*1.0E050.000.00
4C3H5* + C3H5*→C6H10*1.0E130.000.00
5C3H5*→ C3H51.0E020.000.004.0E-4
6C3H5* + C3H5*→H + H + C6H82.0E110.000.00
7C3H5 + C3H5→C6H101.6E130.000.00[26]
8C3H5 + C3H5→H2CCCH2 + C3H61.5E110.000.00
9C3H5* + C3H5*→H2CCCH2 + C3H61.5E120.000.004.0E-4
10C6H10 + H→C3H6 + C3H51.0E120.000.001/10 of [28]
At this point the results of recent studies [26,27,28] performed under different conditions are illuminating. Different to the present work, at both, low pressure (1.3–10 mbar) [26] and at high pressure (1–5 bar) [28] a negligible pressure dependence of product formation was observed. The direct product analysis of Selby et al. (298–600 K) strongly suggests that the disproportionation channel (2) is of minor importance (<3%). This finding is bolstered by two very recent studies, where end products formed at higher temperatures (600–1700 K) were analyzed [27,28]. Interestingly, the end product spectrum found between 1,000–1,200 K by Fridlyand et al. [28] shows similarities to the present study using the pyrolysis of 1,5-hexadiene and allyl iodide as allyl source: propene, allene and propyne were the major products; ethylene and acetylene were the most prominent minor products. The similar yields for allene, propene, and propyne are most pronounced for the lowest pressures in our experiments using allyl bromide as precursor. This may suggest that similar chemical formation mechanisms operate. One difference is that the energy source in our experiment is internal excess energy, provided by photolysis with energy rich 193 nm photons being slowly dissipated to the bath gas at low pressure. A second difference is that unimolecular decomposition reactions driven by chemical activation dominate in the photolysis experiment. Hence, propyne formation may proceed via:
C3H5*→HCCCH3 + H
This channel operates as an elementary unimolecular step under pyrolysis conditions at temperatures above 1000 K (reaction R4 in [28]).The mechanism was studied by Mueller et al. [41], who found the formation of propyne and hydrogen atoms from the decomposition of activated allyl radicals as the dominant channel.
The reason for the absence of allene, but not propyne, in the end product IR spectra taken above 10 mbar is not clear. A straight forward explanation would be that for the conditions of our experiment the disproportionation reaction (2) may gain importance below 10 mbar and that propyne is formed directly from allyl decomposition (4) also at higher pressure. The absence of higher mole fractions of allene and propene in the direct measurements of Selby et al. [26] would then be related to the different photolysis wavelength of 248 nm and consequently a lesser degree of chemical activation (~120 kJ/mol less excess energy). This explanation is along the lines with the discussion of the higher yield of the recombination product in the allyl chloride experiments, in which allyl radicals with lower internal energy were formed. For the highest pressure (500 mbar) most of the allyl radicals react to the recombination product, which is already the case at 4 mbar using allyl chloride (see Table 1).
The product formation can be qualitatively rationalized by kinetic modelling when we assume similarities with pyrolysis experiments around 1100 K [28]. In Table 2 the simple kinetic model is given. The recombination of hot allyl radicals is assumed to produce activated 1,5-hexadiene which decomposes back to two hot allyl radicals. The equilibrium of activated allyl radicals and 1,5-hexadiene is disturbed by loss of activated allyl radicals via the minor disproportionation route and by collisional deactivation of allyl radicals which is included by pressure dependent pseudo-unimolecular step. The rate for this step should be regarded as a switch, tuning the delicate product branching in the hot radical chemistry, rather than an effective strong collision frequency. Allene formation below 10 mbar is explained by a pressure dependent reaction (3), propyne formation by a prompt, pressure independent decomposition of activated allyl, reaction (4). The kinetic simulations showed that an additional source of H atoms is needed to account for the high final product yields of propene and propyne. Different to the modeling part of the recently reported pyrolysis experiment [28], where a much more complex mechanism was used, we incorporated a single, global reaction step (5) to produce H atoms. A similar step was used by Knyazev et al. for the vinyl self- reaction to model a laser photolysis experiment [42] and by us for the allyl self-reaction for modelling fuel rich propene flame chemistry [9]:
C3H5* + C3H5*→C6H8 + 2H
The structure of C6H8 was not specified in [9]. In this work it represents a lumped isomer that collects the carbon mass of minor end products such as acetylene and ethylene. However, this step is assumed to be orders of magnitude slower than the recombination reaction. The model qualitatively explains the trends of pressure dependent end product yields of allene, propene and 1,5-hexadiene (see Figure 3, in order to guide the eye, simulated yields at three pressures (0.4, 4 and 500 mbar) are interpolated by B-splines). We note that the mechanism in Table 2 should be regarded as a tentative, empirical model because the treatment of pressure dependent, photochemical activation driven kinetics is difficult for single chemical steps [43]; here many such steps are involved and some kinetic assumptions may proof implausible by a more detailed analysis. Therefore, we did not try to model acetylene formation, which involves additional uncertain chemical steps. We note that the collision frequencies Z at 0.4 mbar and 1 bar are in the order of 106 and 1010 s−1, respectively. The strong pressure dependence of end product formation in the range of 0.4 to 10 mbar indicates that the specific rate coefficients for unimolecular steps and effective bimolecular collision frequencies of hot allyl radicals are below 106 to 107 s−1. This is the case for the hot species chemistry in our model using the estimated initial allyl radical concentration of 1 × 10−9 mol/cm3. A more specific discussion including vibrational relaxation is beyond the scope of this work with regard to the largely empirical character of the mechanism; see also the discussion in [18].
The discussion above has essentially demonstrated two important points. Firstly, it is clear that in the framework of the present study we cannot give a detailed mechanistic explanation for the high final product yields of propene, propyne and, at low pressure, allene, and acetylene. Secondly, we see in our experiments an end product spectrum, which is dominated by reaction kinetics of energized species. In our experiment propene, allene, and propyne formation is faded out by the increase of pressure (precursor allyl bromide) or the decrease of allyl excess energy after photolysis (precursor allyl chloride). In the recent pyrolysis induced study of the allyl + allyl reaction by Fridlyand et al. the formation of these species is faded out by reducing the temperature [28]. We can definitely exclude that the results of the present work are purely related to precursor induced side reactions. The formation of allene, propyne, and propene is largely suppressed when the allyl + allyl kinetics are turned off by scavenging allyl radicals with O atoms formed from SO2 co-photolysis with allyl bromide and allyl chloride under otherwise identical conditions [10]. In case of allyl bromide, ~85% of consumed precursor was reacted to the above-mentioned products; ~30% was converted to propene at 4 mbar. The pronounced pressure dependence of end product formation in the allyl bromide case is absent in combustion related studies of allyl + allyl [28]. The effect is related to the specific experimental conditions in this work, e.g., low pressure, high radical concentrations and high photolysis photon energies.
Finally, we would like to briefly discuss some aspects of the present results in the broader context of “high-energy” chemistry. Using even higher photon energies [44,45] or electrons as energy source [14,45,46], complex organic compounds can be generated from small precursor species such as CH4 and N2. These experiments aim at simulating the complex photochemistry of planetary atmospheres in laboratory experiments [4,11,14,44,45]. In a recent work it was shown that under specific experimental conditions amino acids and nucleotide bases can be formed by gas phase chemistry [47]. Possible formation pathways were not discussed [47], but it was highlighted that gas phase mechanisms for nucleotide base formation may open a new perspective for the understanding of prebiotic chemistry. These knowledge gaps call for systematic studies aiming at establishing reliable kinetic reference data, which can be used to train photochemical models [4].
The product formation in our experiment, which is highly pressure sensitive in the low pressure range, illustrates the delicate balance of mechanistic branching in chemically activated species chemistry. In this work the mechanistic pathways can still be interpreted by analogy to combustion kinetics [28] although no detailed mechanistic scheme of the radical reactions has been provided. We think that this type of photolysis experiments lends itself for exploring the sub-mechanisms involved in high energy photon driven kinetics, which have applications both in combustion chemistry and photochemistry of planetary bodies.

3. Experimental

The qualitative and quantitative yields of the reaction channels were studied by an arrangement consisting of a laser flash photolysis setup (static stainless steel reactor with a volume of 5 L, excimer laser λ Physik Compex 102 (Lambda Physik, Göttingen, Germany) directly coupled to a FTIR spectrometer (IFS 66 (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany), White optics, 4 m optical path length) for the identification and quantification of stable products. The labile species C3H5 was generated by laser-induced photodecomposition of three different precursors C3H5Cl, C3H5Br, or 1,5-hexadiene (C6H10) at 193 nm in the center of the reactor (photolysis volume ca. 10 cm × 1.7 cm2). The pulse energies were 40 to 80 mJ (~20 ns duration) leading to strong UV radiation. Therefore the time scale of the initiated radical chemistry (microseconds) is short compared to diffusion controlled wall loss of intermediates as tested by kinetic modeling of the experiments, see e.g., [18,48]. The quantum yields of photolysis reactions were determined for 1,5-hexadiene in agreement with [21,26] (see discussion above). For the precursors allyl bromide and allyl chloride we could not directly discriminate photolysis channels leading to C3H4 (allene, propyne) and HCl/HBr from the pathway via the allyl self-reaction or secondary chemistry. However, the absence of allene and propyne in co-photolysis experiments with SO2 [10] indicates that allyl + Br/Cl is the only significant photolysis pathway (see also discussion above). The consumption of the allyl precursors was determined, and all carbon-containing substances were quantified for a mass balance. A quantitative identification was made by the comparison with appropriately scaled pure spectra of identified compounds, leading to a total carbon mass recovery of ~40% (C3H5Cl), ~85% (C3H5Br) and ~95%–100% (1,5-hexadiene). Initial precursor concentrations were chosen such that similar (within an estimated factor of two) allyl concentrations were generated during the photolysis. Further details are given below and in [18,48].


Chemicals were used without further purification: He (≥99.995%), Ar (≥99.998%), C2H4 (≥99.9%), all Messer-Griesheim (Frankfurt, Germany); C3H5Cl (≥99%), C3H5Br (≥99%), 1,5-hexadiene (≥95%), Fluka (Steinheim, Germany; now Sigma-Aldrich); C2H2 (99.5%), CH3CCH (99%), CH2CCH2 (≥97.5%); C3H6 (≥99.95%), Linde (München, Germany).

4. Conclusions

The product formation in the allyl radical self-reaction was examined at room temperature in laser flash photolysis experiments using the precursors C3H5Br, C3H5Cl, and 1,5-hexadiene (C6H10). At low pressure for all precursors an end product spectrum was found which is similar to a recent pyrolysis study, featuring high yields of propene, allene and propyne in addition to the recombination product 1,5-hexadiene. The experimental findings at low pressure were explained by specific reaction kinetics of photochemically activated allyl radicals. Pressure reduction in the C3H5Br experiments was found to induce similar trends in the product spectrum as temperature increase the pyrolysis experiment [28]. These findings exemplify the specificities of reaction kinetics involving chemically activated species, which show both, similarities and differences to established mechanisms in combustion kinetics or atmospheric chemistry. This issue is of importance for the atmospheric oxidation of alkynes [49] and for reactive particle formation processes. In the latter field we have to deal with a complex, yet only poorly understood chemistry, involving reactions of chemically activated species, which exhibits a huge influence on the formation rate and physical-chemical properties of complex particulate matter [14,15,47].


Funding by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (European Graduate School “Microstructural Control in Free-Radical Polymerization”, SFB 357, and GRK 782) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully acknowledged. Furthermore, we acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fonds of the Göttingen University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Warnatz, J.; Maas, U.; Dibble, R.W. Combustion; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  2. Qin, Z.; Lissianski, V.; Yang, H.; Gardiner, W.C.; Davis, S.G.; Wang, H. Combustion chemistry of propane: A case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2000, 28, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ahmed, S.S.; Mauß, F.; Zeuch, T. The Generation of a compact n-heptane toluene reaction mechanism using the Chemistry Guided Reduction (CGR) technique. Z. Phys. Chem. 2009, 222, 551–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Krasnopolsky, V.A. A photochemical model of Titan’s atmosphere and ionosphere. Icarus 2009, 201, 226–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cathonnet, M.; Boettner, J.C.; James, H. Experimental study and numerical modeling of high temperature oxidation of propane and n-butane. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1981, 18, 903–913. [Google Scholar]
  6. Davis, S.G.; Law, C.K.; Wang, H. Propene pyrolysis and oxidation kinetics in a flow reactor and laminar flames. Combust. Flame 1999, 119, 375–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Simmie, J.M. Detailed chemical kinetic models for the combustion of hydrocarbon fuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2003, 29, 599–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Atakan, B.; Hartlieb, A.T.; Brand, J.; Kohse-Höinghaus, K. An experimental investigation of premixed fuel-rich low pressure propene/oxygen/argon flames by laser spectroscopy and molecular-beam mass spectrometry. Proc. Comb. Inst. 1998, 27, 435–444. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoyermann, K.; Mauß, F.; Zeuch, T. A detailed chemical reaction mechanism for the oxidation of hydrocarbons and its application to the analysis of benzene formation in fuel-rich premixed laminar acetylene and propene flames. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 3824–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoyermann, K.; Nacke, F.; Nothdurft, J.; Olzmann, M.; Wehmeyer, J.; Zeuch, T. The reaction of allyl radicals with oxygen atoms - rate coefficient and product branching. Proc. Comb. Inst. 2009, 32, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hébrard, E.; Dobrijevic, M.; Loison, J.C.; Bergeat, A.; Hickson, K.M.; Caralp, F. Photochemistry of C3Hp hydrocarbons in Titan’s stratosphere revisited. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 552, A132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zeuch, T.; Moréac, G.; Ahmed, S.S.; Mauß, F. A comprehensive skeletal mechanism for the oxidation of n-heptane generated by chemistry-guided reduction. Combust. Flame 2008, 155, 651–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H. Formation of nascent soot and other condensed-phase materials in flames. Proc. Comb. Inst. 2011, 33, 41–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Imanaka, H.; Khare, B.N.; Elsila, J.E.; Bakes, E.L.O.; McKay, C.P.; Cruikshank, D.P.; Sugita, S.; Matsui, T.; Zare, R.N. Laboratory experiments of titan tholin formed in cold plasma at various pressures: Implications for nitrogen-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in Titan haze. Icarus 2004, 168, 344–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wolf, J.L.; Richters, S.; Pecher, J.; Zeuch, T. Pressure dependent mechanistic branching in the formation pathways of secondary organic aerosol from cyclic-alkene gas-phase ozonolysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 10952–10964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leonori, F.; Balucani, N.; Capozza, G.; Segoloni, E.; Stranges, D.; Casavecchia, P. Crossed beam studies of radical–radical reactions: O(3P) + C3H5 (allyl). Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. FitzPatrick, B.L.; Lau, K.-C.; Butler, L.J.; Lee, S.-H.; Lin, J.J.-M. Investigation of the O + allyl addition/elimination reaction pathways from the OCH2CHCH2 radical intermediate. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 084301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoyermann, K.; Maarfeld, S.; Nacke, F.; Nothdurft, J.; Olzmann, M.; Wehmeyer, J.; Welz, O.; Zeuch, T. Rate coefficients for cycloalkyl + O reactions and product branching in the decomposition of chemically activated cycloalkoxy radicals: An experimental and theoretical study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 8954–8968. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoyermann, K.; Olzmann, M.; Welz, O.; Zeuch, T. The reaction of iso-propyl radicals with oxygen atoms: Rate coefficient, product branching, and relevance for combustion modeling. Proc. Comb. Inst. 2011, 33, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ismail, H.; Abel, P.R.; Green, W.H.; Fahr, A.; Jusinski, L.E.; Knepp, A.M.; Zádor, J.; Meloni, G.; Selby, T.M.; Osborn, D.L.; et al. Temperature-Dependent kinetics of the vinyl radical (C2H3) self-reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tulloch, J.M.; Macpherson, M.T.; Morgan, C.A.; Pilling, M.J. Flash photolysis studies of free-radical reactions: C3H5 + C3H5 (293–691 K) and C3H5 + NO (295–400 K). J. Phys. Chem. 1982, 86, 3812–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Boyd, A.A.; Nozière, B.; Lesclaux, R. Kinetics and thermochemistry of the reversible combination reactions of the allyl and benzyl radicals with NO. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10815–10823. [Google Scholar]
  23. Matsugi, A.; Suma, K.; Miyoshi, A. Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Allyl plus Allyl and Allyl plus Propargyl Recombination Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 7610–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Georgievskii, Y.; Miller, J.A.; Klippenstein, S.J. Association rate constants for reactions between resonance-stabilized radicals: C3H3 + C3H3, C3H3 + C3H5, and C3H5 + C3H5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9, 4259–4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. James, D.G.L.; Kambanis, S.M. Pyrolysis of diallyl oxalate vapour. Part 1. Kinetics of the unsensitized decomposition. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1969, 65, 1350–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Selby, T.M.; Meloni, G.; Goulay, F.; Leone, S.R.; Fahr, A.; Taatjes, C.A.; Osborn, D.L. Synchrotron photoionization mass spectrometry measurements of kinetics and product formation in the allyl radical (H2CCHCH2) self-reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 9366–9373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lynch, P.T.; Annesley, C.J.; Aul, C.J.; Yang, X.; Tranter, R.S. Recombination of allyl radicals in the high temperature fall-off regime. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 117, 4750–4761. [Google Scholar]
  28. Fridlyand, A.; Lynch, P.T.; Tranter, R.S.; Brezinsky, K. Single pulse shock tube study of allyl radical recombination. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 4762–4776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, H.R.; Eddings, E.G.; Sarofim, A.F.; Westbrook, C.K. Fuel dependence of benzene pathways. Proc. Comb. Inst. 2009, 32, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Simon, F.G.; Heydtmann, H. Bestimmung der Geschwindigkeitskonstanten der Reaktion von1CH2 mit Fluor- und Chlorethen. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 543–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Taatjes, C.A.; Hansen, N.; Osborn, D.L.; Kohse-Höinghaus, K.; Cool, T.A.; Westmoreland, P.R. “Imaging” combustion chemistry via multiplexed synchrotron-photoionization mass spectrometry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 20–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wallington, T.J.; Skewes, L.M.; Siegl, W.O. Kinetics of the gas phase reaction of chlorine atoms with a series of alkenes, alkynes and aromatic species at 295 K. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 1988, 45, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wallington, T.J.; Andino, J.M.; Ball, J.C.; Japar, S.M. Fourier transform infrared studies of the reaction of Cl atoms with PAN, PPN, CH3OOH, HCOOH, CH3COCH3 and CH3COC2H5 at 295 ± 2 K. J. Atmos. Chem. 1990, 10, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Grosjean, D.; Williams, E.L., II. Environmental persistence of organic compounds estimated from structure-reactivity and linear free-energy relationships. Unsaturated aliphatics. Atmos. Environ. Part A 1992, 26, 1395–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wakamatsu, H.; Hidaka, Y. Shock-Tube and modeling study of chloroethane pyrolysis and oxidation. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40, 320–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wallington, J.; Siegl, W.O.; Skewes, L.M.; Japar, S.M. A relative rate study of the reaction of bromine atoms with a variety of organic compounds at 295 K. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1989, 21, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barnes, I.; Bastian, V.; Becker, K.H.; Overath, R.; Tong, Z. Rate constants for the reactions of Br atoms with a series of alkanes, alkenes, and alkynes in the presence of O2. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1989, 21, 499–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bierbach, A.; Barnes, I.; Becker, K.H. Rate coefficients for the gas-phase reactions of bromine radicals with a series of alkenes, dienes, and aromatic hydrocarbons at 298 ± 2K. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1996, 28, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bedjanian, Y.; Poulet, G.; le Bras, G. Low-Pressure Study of the Reactions of Br Atoms with Alkenes. 1. Reaction with Propene. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5867–5875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. McMillen, D.F.; Golden, D.M. Hydrocarbon bond dissociation energies. Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1982, 33, 493–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mueller, J.A.; Miller, J.L.; Butler, L.J.; Qi, F.; Sorkhabi, O.; Suits, A.G. Dependence of the H + Allene/H + Propyne product branching from the unimolecular dissociation of 2-Propenyl radicals. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 11261–11264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Knyazev, V.D.; Stoliarov, S.I.; Slagle, I.R. Kinetics of the reaction of vinyl radicals with acetylene. Proc. Combust. Inst. 1996, 26, 513–519. [Google Scholar]
  43. Somnitz, H.; Ufer, T.; Zellner, R. Acetone photolysis at 248 nm revisited: Pressure dependence of the CO and CO2 quantum yields. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 8522–8531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Imanaka, H.; Smith, M.A. Formation of nitrogenated organic aerosols in the Titan upper atmosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12423–12428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sagan, C.; Khare, B.N. Tholins: Organic chemistry of interstellar grains and gas. Nature 1979, 277, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Raulin, F.; Brassé, C.; Poch, O.; Coll, P. Prebiotic-like chemistry on Titan. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 5380–5393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hörst, S.M.; Yelle, R.V.; Buch, A.; Carrasco, N.; Cernogora, G.; Dutuit, O.; Quirico, E.; Sciamma-O’Brien, E.; Smith, M.A.; Somogyi, Á.; et al. Formation of amino acids and nucleotide bases in a Titan atmosphere simulation experiment. Astrobiology 2012, 12, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hoyermann, K.; Nothdurft, J.; Olzmann, M.; Wehmeyer, J.; Zeuch, T. Formation and decomposition of chemically activated cyclopentoxy radicals from the c-C5H9 + O reaction. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 3165–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Glowacki, D.R.; Lockhart, J.; Blitz, M.A.; Klippenstein, S.J.; Pilling, M.J.; Robertson, S.H.; Seakins, P.W. Interception of excited vibrational quantum states by O2 in atmospheric association reactions. Science 2012, 337, 1066–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Not available.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seidel, L.; Hoyermann, K.; Mauß, F.; Nothdurft, J.; Zeuch, T. Pressure Dependent Product Formation in the Photochemically Initiated Allyl + Allyl Reaction. Molecules 2013, 18, 13608-13622.

AMA Style

Seidel L, Hoyermann K, Mauß F, Nothdurft J, Zeuch T. Pressure Dependent Product Formation in the Photochemically Initiated Allyl + Allyl Reaction. Molecules. 2013; 18(11):13608-13622.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seidel, Lars, Karlheinz Hoyermann, Fabian Mauß, Jörg Nothdurft, and Thomas Zeuch. 2013. "Pressure Dependent Product Formation in the Photochemically Initiated Allyl + Allyl Reaction" Molecules 18, no. 11: 13608-13622.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop