Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of New Indole Derivatives Structurally Related to Donepezil and Their Biological Evaluation as Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors
Next Article in Special Issue
QSAR Modeling on Benzo[c]phenanthridine Analogues as Topoisomerase I Inhibitors and Anti-cancer Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of SRN1-Type Coupling Adducts from Aliphatic gem-Dinitro Compounds in Ionic Liquids
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling Chemical Interaction Profiles: II. Molecular Docking, Spectral Data-Activity Relationship, and Structure-Activity Relationship Models for Potent and Weak Inhibitors of Cytochrome P450 CYP3A4 Isozyme
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models

Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, della Scienza 1-20126 Milano, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(5), 4791-4810;
Received: 14 March 2012 / Revised: 13 April 2012 / Accepted: 16 April 2012 / Published: 25 April 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue QSAR and Its Applications)
One of the OECD principles for model validation requires defining the Applicability Domain (AD) for the QSAR models. This is important since the reliable predictions are generally limited to query chemicals structurally similar to the training compounds used to build the model. Therefore, characterization of interpolation space is significant in defining the AD and in this study some existing descriptor-based approaches performing this task are discussed and compared by implementing them on existing validated datasets from the literature. Algorithms adopted by different approaches allow defining the interpolation space in several ways, while defined thresholds contribute significantly to the extrapolations. For each dataset and approach implemented for this study, the comparison analysis was carried out by considering the model statistics and relative position of test set with respect to the training space. View Full-Text
Keywords: QSAR; model validation; Applicability Domain; interpolation space QSAR; model validation; Applicability Domain; interpolation space
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sahigara, F.; Mansouri, K.; Ballabio, D.; Mauri, A.; Consonni, V.; Todeschini, R. Comparison of Different Approaches to Define the Applicability Domain of QSAR Models. Molecules 2012, 17, 4791-4810.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop