Next Article in Journal
Progress in Drug Delivery to the Central Nervous System by the Prodrug Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Structural Patterns of Rhamnogalacturonans Modulating Hsp-27 Expression in Cultured Human Keratinocytes
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Biological Activity of Some New Pyrazoline and Pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrazole-4,6-dione Derivatives: Reaction of Nitrilimines with Some Dipolarophiles
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Characterization of Konjac Glucomannan-Graft-Polyacrylamide via γ-Irradiation
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Influence of Hofmeister Series Ions on Hyaluronan Swelling and Viscosity

1
Department of Physics and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Nad Stráněmi 4511, 76005 Zlín, Czech Republic
2
Medical Materials Research Centre, Technology park, University Institute, Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Nad Ovcirnou III 3685, Zlín, 76001 Czech Republic
3
CPN Ltd., Dolní Dobrouč 401, 561 02 Dolní Dobrouč, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2008, 13(5), 1025-1034; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13051025
Received: 28 February 2008 / Revised: 17 April 2008 / Accepted: 30 April 2008 / Published: 1 May 2008

Abstract

:
The dissolution of hyaluronan in water leads to its degradation, and as a result its molecular weight decreases. The degradation of hyaluronan is mainly influenced by temperature, solution composition, and also its pH. This study describes the influence of Hofmeister series ions on hyaluronan behaviour and hyaluronan film swelling by solutions of these ions. It was found that Hofmeister ions show lyotropic effects influencing the entanglement of hyaluronan coils and their expansion from solid polymer films into swollen gel state. The hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions in the structure of hyaluronan macromolecules are represented by the mutual diffusion coefficient D(c), the mean mutual diffusion coefficient Ds, the expansion work of coil swelling RAδ,s, the activation enthalpy of diffusion connected with swelling HD,s and kinematic viscosity of hyaluronan-ions solutions ν.

Introduction

In 1934 Meyer and Palmer described a procedure for isolation of a novel glycosaminoglycan from the vitreous humor of bovine eyes [1]. They showed that this substance contained an uronic acid and an aminosugar, but no sulfoesters. This marked the birth announcement of one of Nature’s most versatile and fascinating macromolecules. It was first isolated as an acid, but it behaved like a salt (sodium hyaluronate) under physiological conditions. Today, this macromolecule is most frequently referred to as hyaluronan, reflecting the fact that it exists in vivo as a polyanion and not in the protonated acid form. During the 1930s and 1940s, hyaluronan was isolated from many different sources such as synovial fluids, umbilical cords, vitreous body, skin, rooster comb and also biotechnologically synthesized from streptococci suspensions. Numerous ideas have been offered for applying hyaluronan in different areas and nowadays, many of them are actually used in medicine, pharmacology or in cosmetics. It would take an additional 20 years before Meyer’s laboratory finally completed the work that determined the precise chemical structure of the basic disaccharide unit that forms hyaluronan [2]. During these years they showed that the uronic acid and aminosugar in the disaccharide are D-glucuronic acid and D-N-acetylglucosamine, and that they are linked together through alternating β–1,4 and β–1,3 glycosidic bonds. Both sugars are spatially related to glucose, which in the beta configuration allows all of its bulky groups to be in sterically favourable equatorial positions while all of the small hydrogen atoms occupy the less sterically favourable axial position. Thus, the structure of the disaccharide shown in Figure 1 is energetically very stable [3]. The conformation of hyaluronan acid (HA) has been analysed by a number of techniques showing that the hydrogen bonds are crucial to both secondary and tertiary structures [4].
Figure 1. The monomeric unit of hyaluronic acid.
Figure 1. The monomeric unit of hyaluronic acid.
Molecules 13 01025 g001
The secondary structure of HA (a reducing terminal tetrasaccharide fragment) as a two-fold helix with hydrogen bonds (dotted lines) can be seen in Figure 2. All the indicated H-bonds form in dimethyl sulphoxide solution, whereas in aqueous solution some are replaced by water bridges. In connection with this, it is very useful to study the influence of any ions present in hyaluronan solutions on the secondary and tertiary structure of this polysaccharide.
Figure 2. The secondary structure of HA.
Figure 2. The secondary structure of HA.
Molecules 13 01025 g002
Ions of the Hofmeister series have a significant effect on the solubility of macromolecular substances and on the stability of their respective secondary, tertiary and quaternary structures. The Hofmeister series (lyotropic series - an order of ability of ions to convert into salt-out or salt-in proteins) are considered to be ions having a typical ion-specific influence on polymers in aqueous systems. The order of Hofmeister anions and cations is:
SCN- < I- < ClO4- < NO3- < Br- < ClO3- < Cl- < BrO3- < F- < SO42-
K+ < Na+ << Li+ ~ Ca2+.
The effects of the Hofmeister series seems to apply mainly in experiments where solvents with higher salt concentrations are used. The initial ions in the series increase the solvent surface tension and decrease the solubility of non-polar "salt-out" molecules, which leads to a strengthening of the hydrophobic interactions. On the other hand, a few final salts in Hofmeister series increase the solubility of non-polar "salt-in" molecules and increase the order in water, which decreases the hydrophobic interactions. These salts interact directly with proteins or polymers and may even be specifically bonded with ions having a strong "salting-in" effect [5, 16,17,18]. Similar ion-effects have been found in the swelling behaviour of several kinds of polymer gels. Suzuki et al. [6] investigated the effects of ions on the thermal volume transition in polymer gels and some kind of Hofmeister series effects were detected for the temperature transition. There was discrepancy with the speculations that the origin of ion-effect is caused by the change in water structure around the hydrophobic group [6].
The behaviour of hyaluronan during diffusion process of swelling is presented in this article. The theoretical background behind the computation of mutual diffusion coefficients, mean mutual diffusion coefficients, the expansion work of swelling coils and the activation enthalpy of diffusion connected with swelling HD,s has been fully published by Mracek et al. [7].

Results and Discussion

The influence of Hofmeister series ions on hyaluronan behaviour and hyaluronan films swelling by solutions of these ions can be studied by interferometric methods. The dependence of the mutual diffusion coefficient of swelling on the ability of water to solvate hyaluronan was verified. As can be seen in Figure 3, the relation between the mutual diffusion coefficient and hyaluronan concentration in swollen layer shows a statistically significant decreasing rate of swelling diffusion process for experiment with KF addition (Ionic strength I = 0.1 mol∙L-1) as compared with swelling of hyaluronan by pure water. On the other hand, solutions of NaCl, MgCl2 and KI force diffusion swelling processes.
Figure 3. Relation between mutual diffusion coefficient and HA concentration in surface swollen layers.
Figure 3. Relation between mutual diffusion coefficient and HA concentration in surface swollen layers.
Molecules 13 01025 g003
Differences between monovalent cations (Na+, K+) and divalent cations (Mg2+) at ionic strength I = 0.1 mol∙L-1 are consistent with predictions that charge shielding by divalent ions is greater [8, 9]. The data for the swelling diffusion process suggests that Mg2+ causes greater domain contraction, which is additional to the electrostatically induced changes in HA properties observed with K+ and Na+. Individual Mg2+ ions may co-ordinate two carboxy groups on the same HA chain secondary structure (Figure 2), and promote chain contraction. Consequently, cations of Mg2+ could induce a significant reduction of chain stiffness. However, the mutual diffusion coefficient D(c) of swelling shows (Figure 4) nearly order of magnitude differences for KI solutions in comparison with KF ones. In this case, the influence of the anions (F-, Cl-, I-) on the behaviour of the K+ cation is evident. This fact can be viewed as in accordance with theory of Hofmeister ion series (hydrophilic→ I‑1<Cl‑1<F‑1←hydrophobic). F- or Cl- ions may alter the co-ordination of water molecules with HA chains, thereby disrupting the hydrogen bonds involved in water bridges. The strong reduction of hydrophilic chain interaction and creation of hairpin loops caused by F- can consequently induce a significant increase of chain stiffness. The lower ionic strength shows similar dependences (see in Figure 4), which are represented by the mean mutual diffusion coefficient.
Figure 4. The mean mutual diffusion coefficients of hyaluronan solutions.
Figure 4. The mean mutual diffusion coefficients of hyaluronan solutions.
Molecules 13 01025 g004
The results and conclusions from the diffusion process of swelling can be compared with results obtained by viscosity measurements (see Figure 5). The additions of ions to aqueous hyaluronan solutions are generally connected with a decrease in the kinematic viscosity. However, the observed higher kinematic viscosity values of KF-enriched HA solutions supports the hypothesis of an increase of chain stiffness caused by the presence of F-.
Figure 5. The kinematic viscosity: the comparison of HA-water solutions and HA-ion solutions.
Figure 5. The kinematic viscosity: the comparison of HA-water solutions and HA-ion solutions.
Molecules 13 01025 g005
Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the relationship between RAδ,s and ΔΗD,s, respectively, and additions of salts (NaCl, MgCl2, KI, KF) at different ionic strengths (I = 0.01 0.05 and 0.1 mol∙L-1). These results show that solvation of HA by water is strongly dependent on the ionic strength and particularly on the variety of salt dissociated in the aqueous solutions of HA.
Figure 6. The volume expansion work (RAδ,s) resulting from expansion of HA coils during their transition from solid polymer phase into the gel phase of swollen layer.
Figure 6. The volume expansion work (RAδ,s) resulting from expansion of HA coils during their transition from solid polymer phase into the gel phase of swollen layer.
Molecules 13 01025 g006
Figure 7. The activation enthalpy of diffusion connected with swelling (ΔΗD,s) under constant pressure.
Figure 7. The activation enthalpy of diffusion connected with swelling (ΔΗD,s) under constant pressure.
Molecules 13 01025 g007
The values of RAδ,s and ΔΗD,s are considerably influenced by the polarity of the basic structural polymer unit - the monomer. Some authors have reported [4, 10,11,12] the important role of hydrogen bonds in hyaluronate chain structures and the associated problem of the relationship between hyaluronate swelling and intermolecular interactions influenced by hydrogen bonds [13,14]. The functionality of hyaluronic acid can mostly be traced back to the swelling properties of polyelectrolyte networks. In aqueous solutions the hyaluronan molecule becomes a negatively charged polyelectrolyte and its size, conformation and its degree of hydration depend on dissociation [13]. Consequently, the affinity between the polymer film and the solvent are very important in the swelling diffusion process, because the solvent molecules must penetrate into the polymer and then the polymer chain molecules must be solvated by solvent molecules. Subsequently, the swelling continues with the expansion of polymer coils and the polymer mobility and permeability increases [15]. As can be seen in Figure 6, the volume expansion work RAδ,s for HA-KF is significant higher than for HA-pure and it is evident (see Figure 7), that the values of activation enthalpy of diffusion connected with swelling ΔHD,s are largely dependent on the variety of salts and the salts on the hydrophobic part of Hofmeister series increase these values. It is assumed that the solvation of HA with ion solutions on the hydrophobic part of Hofmeister series results in the decreasing flexibility of the macromolecular coil and results in an increase of the potential barrier which must be overcome during the diffusion process of swelling.
The results obtained support the hypothesis of hydrophilic-hydrophobic interaction [19] in hyaluronan chains swollen by Hofmeister ions solutions. This hypothesis was verified by diffusion process of swelling and viscosity measurements. With respect to applications of hyaluronan in ophthalmology, surgery and wound healing, it will be very interesting to study the behaviour of hyaluronan in the water solutions with additions of quaternary ions (for example hexadecyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide). It is known that these quaternary ions create hyaluronan precipitates in aqueous solution. The results (the influence Hofmeister ions on swelling and kinematic viscosity of hyaluronan solutions) reported in this paper can be used for re-conversions of these precipitates. Accordingly, our next results concerning to this hyaluronan precipitates problem will be published shortly.

Experimental

Materials

The hyaluronan samples (rank 150806-D1) were obtained from Contipro, Ltd., Dolní Dobrouč, Czech Republic, (molar mass Mw = 630x103 g∙mol-1). All materials and chemicals used for the experiments were of standard purity p.a. The following salts in solutions (redistilled water + salt) for swelling process and viscosity measurements were used: sodium chloride, NaCl (Fluka); magnesium chloride, MgCl2 (Fluka); potassium fluoride, KF (Fluka); potassium iodide, KI (Sigma-Adrich). The process of swollen surface layer formation was studied on the solid films of polymer samples prepared by casting from the 0.01M concentration solutions in redistilled water and by subsequent evaporation in a desiccator.

Experimental setup and measurments

The swelling diffusion process measurements were done using the previously described wedge interferometer [7, 8]. Experiments were performed at five temperatures (25, 30, 37, 40 and 45°C). The mutual diffusion coefficient D(c) and mean mutual diffusion coefficient of swelling (Ds) at definite times were measured and computed from recorded interferograms. A typical interferogram can be seen in Figure 8, which shows the concentration field of hyaluronan on the surface swollen layer expressed as the change of refractive index.
Figure 8. A typical interferogram obtained from swelling diffusion process measurement.
Figure 8. A typical interferogram obtained from swelling diffusion process measurement.
Molecules 13 01025 g008
Samples of thin hyaluronan films were put in a temperature-controlled holder of (23x20x3.5)x10-9 m3 volume between two semi-transparent glass plates with a transparency of about 40%. The temperature was controlled exactly constant to a deviation of ±0.1°C. In each measurement, 3-5 shots were taken at regular intervals. The final resultant interferograms were scanned with a NIKON COOLPIX 4500 digital camera. The SAIA software developed by Urban and Mracek (Department of Physics and Materials Engineering, FT, TBU in Zlin) was used for the image analyses of the interferograms. The factors RAδ,s, ΔHD,s, were calculated using logarithmic form formulas [7, 8], consequently, standard estimatation errors for RAδ,s and ΔHD,s were computed for confidence interval at 80% significance level. The kinematic viscosity ν values were obtained from measurements executed on an Ubbelohde viscometer (C = 0.01) at five temperatures (25, 30, 37, 40 and 45°C) and the ionic strength of solvents was I = 0.05 mol∙L-1.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grant from CPN, Ltd. Author M. Lehocký would also like to express his gratitude to the Ministry of Education, Youth and Physical Training of the Czech Republic (Grant VZ MSM 7088352101).

References

  1. Meyer, K.; Palmer, J.W. The polysaccharide of the vitreous humor. J. Biol. Chem. 1934, 107, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  2. Weissman, B.; Meyer, K. The structure of hyalobiuronic acid and of hyaluronicacid from umbilical cord. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 1753–1757. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hascall, V.C.; Laurent, T.C. Hyauloran: Structure and Physical Properties. Available online: http://www.glycoforum.gr.jp/.
  4. Fischer, E.; Callaghan, P.T.; Heatley, F.; Scott, J.E. Shear flow affects secondary and tertiary structures in hyaluronan solution as shown by rheo-NMR. J. Mol. Struct. 2002, 602-603, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Baldwin, R.L. How Hofmeister ion interactions affect protein stability. Biophys. J. 1996, 71, 2056–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suzuki, A.; Hirasa, O. An approach to artificial muscle using polymer gels formed by microphase separation. Adv. Polym. Sci. 1993, 110, 241–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mráček, A.; Benešová, K.; Minařík, T.; Urban, P.; Lapčík, L. The diffusion process of Sodium Hyaluronate (Na-HA) and Na-HA-n-alkyl derivatives films swelling. J. Biomed. Mat. Res. A 2007, 83A, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maroudas, A.; Weinberg, P.D.; Parker, K.H.; Winlove, C.P. The distribution and diffusivities of small ions in chondroitin sulphate, hyaluronate and some proteoglycan solutions. Biophys. Chem. 1988, 32, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parker, K.H.; Winlove, C.P.; Maroudas, A. The theoretical distributions and diffusivities of small ions in chondroitin sulphate and hyaluronate. Biophys. Chem. 1988, 32, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cowman, M.K.; Matsuoka, S. Experimental approaches to hyaluronan structure. Carbohydr. Res. 2005, 340, 791–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Almond, A.; Brass, A.; Sheeman, J.K. Dynamic exchange between stabilized conformations predicted for hyaluronan tetrasaccharides: comparison of molecular dynamics simulations with available NMR data. Glycobiology 1998, 8, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gribbon, P.; Heng, B.Ch.; Hardingham, T.E. The analysis of intermolecular interactions in concentrated hyaluronan solutions suggest no evidence for chain-chain association. Biochem. J. 2000, 350, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albersdörfer, A.; Sackman, E. Swelling behaviour and viscoelasticity of ultrathin grafted hyaluronic acid films. Eur. Phys. J. B 1999, 10, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haeshin, L.; Ho Choi, S.; Park, T.G. Direct visualization of hyaluronic acid polymer chain by self-assembled one-dimensional array of gold nanoparticles. Macromolecules 2006, 39, 23–25. [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller-Chou, B.A.; Koenig, J.L. Polymer dissolution. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2003, 28, 1223–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kunz, W.; Lo Nostro, P.; Ninham, B.W. The present state of affairs with Hofmeister effects. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2004, 9, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cacace, M.G.; Landau, E.M.; Ramsden, J.J. The Hofmeister series: salt and solvent effects on interfacial phenomena. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 1997, 30, 241–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Collins, K.D.; Washabauch, M.W. The effect and behavior of water interfaces. Quart. Rev. Biophys. 1985, 18, 323–422. [Google Scholar]
  19. Scott, J.E.; Cummings, C.; Brass, A.; Chen, Y. Secondary and tertiary structures of hyaluronan in aqueous solution, investigated by rotary shadowing-electron microscopy and computer simulation. hyaluronan is very efficient network-forming polymer. Biochem. J. 1991, 274, 699–705. [Google Scholar]
  • Sample Availability: Contact the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mráček, A.; Varhaníková, J.; Lehocký, M.; Gřundělová, L.; Pokopcová, A.; Velebný, V. The Influence of Hofmeister Series Ions on Hyaluronan Swelling and Viscosity. Molecules 2008, 13, 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13051025

AMA Style

Mráček A, Varhaníková J, Lehocký M, Gřundělová L, Pokopcová A, Velebný V. The Influence of Hofmeister Series Ions on Hyaluronan Swelling and Viscosity. Molecules. 2008; 13(5):1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13051025

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mráček, Aleš, Júlia Varhaníková, Marián Lehocký, Lenka Gřundělová, Alena Pokopcová, and Vladimír Velebný. 2008. "The Influence of Hofmeister Series Ions on Hyaluronan Swelling and Viscosity" Molecules 13, no. 5: 1025-1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules13051025

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop