Next Article in Journal
Identification of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Genotypes with Potential for Hydric and Heat Stress Tolerance in Northeastern Mexico
Next Article in Special Issue
Potassium and Humic Acid Synergistically Increase Salt Tolerance and Nutrient Uptake in Contrasting Wheat Genotypes through Ionic Homeostasis and Activation of Antioxidant Enzymes
Previous Article in Journal
Light Deficiency Inhibits Growth by Affecting Photosynthesis Efficiency as well as JA and Ethylene Signaling in Endangered Plant Magnolia sinostellata
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Efficiency of Different Priming Agents for Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Local Tunisian Barley under Salinity Stress

1
Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Biotechnology Center of Borj-Cedria, P.O. Box 901, Hammam-Lif 2050, Tunisia
2
Faculty of Sciences of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 1060, Tunisia
3
Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura, Spanish National Research Council (CEBAS-CSIC), Departameno Nutricion Vegetal, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2264; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112264
Submission received: 23 August 2021 / Revised: 23 September 2021 / Accepted: 6 October 2021 / Published: 22 October 2021

Abstract

:
The current work aimed to investigate the effect of seed priming with different agents (CaCl2, KCl, and KNO3) on germination and seedling establishment in seeds of the barley species of both Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) and Hordeum maritimum germinated with three salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl). The results showed that under unprimed conditions, salt stress significantly reduced the final germination rate, the mean daily germination, and the seedling length and dry weight. It led to a decrease in the essential nutrient content (iron, calcium, magnesium, and potassium) against an increase in sodium level in both of the barley species. Moreover, this environmental constraint provoked a membrane injury caused by a considerable increase in electrolyte leakage and the malondialdehyde content (MDA). Data analysis proved that seed priming with CaCl2, KCl, and KNO3 was an effective method for alleviating barley seed germination caused by salt stress to varying degrees. Different priming treatments clearly stimulated germination parameters and the essential nutrient concentration, in addition to increasing the seedling growth rate. The application of seed priming reduced the accumulation of sodium ions and mitigated the oxidative stress of seeds caused by salt. This mitigation was traduced by the maintenance of low levels of MDA and electrolyte leakage. We conclude that the priming agents can be classed into three ranges based on their efficacy on the different parameters analyzed; CaCl2 was placed in the first range, followed closely by KNO3, while the least effective was KCl, which placed in the third range.

1. Introduction

Germination, as the most crucial process in the crop life cycle, is regulated by both internal and external factors. Internal factors include proteins, plant hormones, and seed age and size. External factors incorporate abiotic and biotic constraints such as drought, temperature, salinity, nutritional deficiency, metal, and pathogen disease. Germination is extremely sensitive to these environmental stressors [1]. Salinity is among the most harmful environmental stresses that restrict agricultural productivity [2]. It greatly limits crop yield in semi-arid and arid regions, and affects approximately 397 million hectares of fertile soil in the world [3]. In fact, under such an environmental stressor, seedling growth and the productivity of several crops are affected due to water limitations and ion imbalance [4,5]. A negative correlation has also been found with seed germination, as the toxic effect of sodium and chloride seriously affect embryo viability [6]. In addition, Patade et al. [7] and Ansari and Sharif-Zadeh [8] reported that salinity not only decreases the germination percentage and prolongs seed dormancy by delaying the start of germination, but also leads to the death of seeds before germination.
It is well known that in the Mediterranean region, the majority of plant species are very sensitive to salt stress. For this reason, adaptations and improving seed tolerance to salinity during germination represent a particular agronomic goal and are important for the economics of many countries worldwide. Several strategies for improving the growth and development of crops have been investigated for many years. These approaches are based on old, costly, and slow-moving techniques such as the selection of species (screening). As a solution to overcome these adverse conditions in agricultural land, seed priming is one of the most frequently used techniques employed by farmers. It is based on the pre-exposure of seeds or young seedlings to chemical agents or to abiotic stressors (such as salinity, drought, and nutrient deficiency), making them more resistant to subsequent stresses and enhancing their ability to detect secondary signals quickly [9]. Recently, Boukari et al. demonstrated that seed priming ameliorates the growth of alfalfa plants subjected to salinity, iron deficiency, and their combined effect [10]. It has also been reported that seed pretreatment enhances the tolerance of many other crops to salt stress by stimulating seed germination [11,12], such as lettuce [13], tomato [14], and maize [15,16].
Many efficient compounds are used to broaden the application of this technique. Among them, potassium and calcium ions are used for osmo priming through treatment with KNO3, KCl, and CaCl2. These compounds are relatively inexpensive and easy to obtain [17], and several studies have reported that they are effective at promoting seed germination under salt stress [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Indeed, it has been shown that CaCl2 plays a crucial role in regulating plant hormone metabolism [19]. Moreover, recent reports suggest that the ameliorative effect of external calcium on plants facing salinity may be associated with the maintenance of an optimal sodium/potassium ratio in the cytosol [20,21]. Similar interest has been focused on the effect of potassium nitrate (KNO3) seed priming in several plant species. As proven by Joshi et al., treating seeds with KNO3 ameliorates tolerance in cucumber to salt stress by activating the antioxidant system and accumulating proline [22]. Generally, during germination under salt stress, seeds treated with KNO3 exhibit an increase in proteins, free amino acids, and soluble sugars [23]. Additionally, Kaya et al. revealed that supplying KNO3 had a key role in regulating osmotic pressure and activating enzymes [24]. Furthermore, several studies demonstrated the alleviating role of KCl during salinity by reducing the sodium levels. Indeed, KCl priming improved safflower seed germination under salinity [25]. Furthermore, the findings of Ruan et al. demonstrated that the application of KCl seed priming to rice had improved results for the germination index [26]. In this regard, Taiz and Zeiger related the efficiency of KCl priming to the osmotic power of potassium ions to enhance cell water saturation [27].
Hordeum maritimum is considered an important wild cereal and as an annual facultative halophyte in Tunisian flora, widely distributed mainly in saline habitats such as Soliman and Kalbia Sebkhas, characterized by an electrical conductivity of saturated soil paste extract (ECe) around 19.0 dSm−1 and a soluble sodium content of about 92.6 µmolg−1 soil, corresponding to slightly more than 200 mM [28]. Hordeum maritimum contributes significantly to the annual biomass production in Tunisia because it is able to tolerate high salt concentrations without showing symptoms of toxicity (it can survive up to 300 mM NaCl in saline zones) [29,30]. It deals with these adverse conditions by developing appropriate physiological responses such as free proline, glycine betaine, and free amino acids through a process known as osmotic adjustment in response to the decreased external water potential [31]. Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) is a cereal grain and a glycophyte that ranks fifth among all crops for dry matter production worldwide. It is considered an important food source, especially in Tunisian ecosystems.
Hordeum maritimum, a wild seaside barley, is a halophyte plant, while H.vulgare is a glycophyte, and their salt tolerance mechanisms are completely different. Indeed, wild barley has a more pronounced salt-tolerant behavior than cultivated barley [32]. For this reason, H. maritimum is an appropriate model to study the mechanisms of salinity tolerance in cereals [33]. In fact, when soil salinity is a temporary condition, glycophytes, a group of plants to which the majority of crops belong, have to cope with osmotic stress and ion toxicity using specific short-term strategies that allow for osmotically balancing the cell, control ion, and water homeostasis, and recover stress induced damage based on the production of a low osmolyte content, as well as the possibility of a reduction in the salt concentration in the root medium [34]. These adaptation mechanisms are of central importance in glycophytes allowing for the ability to grow under stressful conditions [35]. However, the defense mechanisms that halophyte plants have evolved to adapt to salt stress are mainly partitioning sodium and chloride in the vacuole, as well as reserving the synthesis and accumulation of organic solutes for a high salinity (200 and 300 mM NaCl)in the cytosol [35]. In particular, in many halophytes, proline and glycine betaine are highly accumulated and contribute to the balance of osmotic pressure in the cell as a whole [36]. These compatible compounds protect macromolecular structures and mitigate oxidative damage adjustment, in addition to their fundamental role of osmotically balancing the cytosol [37]. Even more resistant than other cereal crops to environmental constraints, when grown in saline soils, cultivated barley, has a lower degree of tolerance compared with wild species. The higher degree of salt tolerance of H. maritimum compared with H. vulgare is related to its higher membrane integrity. In fact, the levels of membrane lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage increased considerably with a lower salt concentration in H. vulgare because of oxidative damage, whereas those of H. maritimum changed remarkably only under high salt concentrations [38].
Hence, H. vulgare and H. maritimum are both species of considerable interest, and it would be valuable to perform more detailed studies in order to improve their tolerance to various environmental constraints. Although there are many reports considering the beneficial effects of seed priming agents in the germination and growth of many crops during salt stress, no previous work has mainly focused on their impact in the germination stage of both of these local Tunisian barley species. Furthermore, investigations comparing the relative effects of different priming agents on barley germination under different salt treatments have rarely been reported. For this reason, this study intended to clarify the role of priming seeds with KNO3, KCl, or CaCl2 for improving the tolerance of the barley species of both H. vulgare (L. Manel) (cultivated) and H. maritimum (wild) when subjected to salinity.

2. Results

2.1. Effect of Seed Priming on Germination Parameters

2.1.1. Final Germination Rate (FG %)

The results of Figure 1 show that priming with KCl, KNO3, or CaCl2 alleviated the impact of salt stress caused by either 100 or 200 Mm NaCl on the FG% of the barley seeds. Among the priming agents, CaCl2 seemed to be the most efficient protector, causing an increase of 26% and 61% in FG% in H. maritimum and H. vulgare (L. Manel), respectively, particularly when the seeds were exposed to 200 mM NaCl compared with their unprimed equivalents, while in the absence of priming treatments, seed germination was clearly affected by the salinity. The application of 200 mM NaCl caused a 34% and 47% reduction in FG% for H. maritimum and H. vulgare (L. Manel), respectively, compared with the control.

2.1.2. Mean Daily Germination (MDG)

The results shown in Figure 2 illustrate that without seed priming, salt stress significantly decreased MDG in both barley species. This decrease was more obvious when H. vulgare (L. Manel) seeds were exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Interestingly, priming with KCl, KNO3, or CaCl2 promoted seed germination by increasing the values of MDG in H. maritimum and H. vulgare (L. Manel) seeds subjected either to 100 or 200 mM NaCl. The beneficial effect of several agents was similar and clearer in H. vulgare (L. Manel).

2.2. Effect of Seed Priming on Seedling Growth

2.2.1. Seedling Length

The data of Figure 3 show that both NaCl concentrations negatively affected seedling length in both barley species. For unprimed seeds of H. vulgare (L. Manel), the coleoptiles and radicles length decreased by 67% and 65%, respectively, while, those of H. maritimum diminished by 37% and 27%, respectively, when they were exposed to 200 mM NaCl, compared with their untreated controls. However, among all of the priming agents applied, CaCl2 mostly enhanced the growth of the radicle and the coleoptile length in both species, with or without salt treatment. In fact, when the seeds were exposed to 200 mM NaCl, the stimulation of radicle length reached 92% and 37%, respectively; however, the coleoptile length was induced by 140% and 32%, respectively in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, compared with their unprimed stressed equivalents.

2.2.2. Dry Biomass

Salinity had a significant inhibitory effect on the dry biomass of the unprimed seedlings of both barley species (Figure 4). This effect was more pronounced in H. vulgare (L. Manel) than in H. maritimum. Indeed, when the seeds were subjected to 200 mM NaCl, the coleoptile dry weight reached a decrease of 61% and 35%, respectively, also, radicles dry weight was reduced by 61.5% and 38%, respectively in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum compared to the control. Nevertheless, seed priming with CaCl2, KCl and KNO3 considerably alleviated the adverse effect of salinity by promoting seedling dry biomass of both species. It is noteworthy that among these priming agents, CaCl2 seemed to be the most efficient protector under either 100 mM or 200 mM NaCl (Figure 4). It stimulated the radicle dry weight of the seedlings from the seeds subjected to 200 mM by 94% and 43% in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, compared with the seedlings from the stressed unprimed seeds. CaCl2 clearly increased the coleoptile dry weight in H. vulgare (L. Manel) germinated with 100 mM NaCl by 114%, while the rate of increase reached only 30% in H. maritimum exposed to 200 mM NaCl, compared with their unprimed equivalents.

2.2.3. Mineral Nutrition

Iron

The data presented in Table 1 demonstrate that for the seedlings from unprimed seeds, salt treatments significantly decreased the iron content in both barley species. Under the effect of 200 mM NaCl, the iron concentration was reduced by 71.7% and 38.5% in coleoptile, while in radicle the reduction rate was about 56% and 34.9% in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, compared with the untreated control. Interestingly, all of the priming agents positively affected the iron content of the seedlings from the stressed seeds of both species compared with the unprimed stressed ones. However, this beneficial effect was clearly marked in the H. vulgare (L. Manel) species. When the seeds of H. vulgare (L. Manel) were exposed to 200 mM NaCl, the best stimulation of the Fe concentration was recorded in coleoptile, which reached 90% in the seedlings from the seeds pretreated with CaCl2 and 89% in the seedlings from seeds pretreated with KNO3, while it was about 79% and 66% in the radicle of seedlings from pretreated seeds with CaCl2 and KNO3, respectively, compared with their unprimed equivalents.

Calcium

As shown in Table 1, salinity significantly reduced the calcium content in the seedlings from the unprimed seeds of both barley species. This reduction was more prominent when the seeds were treated with 200 mM NaCl. The calcium concentration decreased by 58% and 57.9%in the coleoptile of H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, and by 62% and 21% in the radicle of H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, in comparison with their untreated control. Priming with CaCl2, KCl, and KNO3 increased the concentration of this nutrient in germinated seeds with all salt treatments. For H. vulgare (L. Manel), CaCl2 was the most powerful agent by contributing to the calcium concentration enhancement by 119% and 135%in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively, of the seedlings subjected to 200 mM NaCl, compared with their non-primed stressed equivalents. In addition, for H. maritimum, CaCl2 induced the greatest calcium content of coleoptile by 90% when the seeds were exposed to 200 mM NaCl and of radicle by 32% when the seeds were subjected to 100 mM NaCl when compared with the unprimed NaCl treated seeds.

Magnesium

Under unprimed conditions, the values of the magnesium content in the seedling were clearly decreased by both NaCl treatments (Table 1). The most important decline was noted in the seedlings stressed with 200mMfor both species. Indeed, it reached 53% and 50.4% in coleoptile, and 53.8% and 47.9% in radicle in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, compared with the untreated control. Nevertheless, under salinity stress, the magnesium concentration was higher in the seedlings primed with different agents than in the unprimed stressed controls. Interestingly, CaCl2 seemed to be the most powerful one to remove the depressive effect of salt and to procure a greater improvement in the magnesium content, especially in H. vulgare (L. Manel). The rate of stimulation was 127% and 102% in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively, of seedlings subjected to 200 mM NaCl, compared with their stressed unprimed equivalents. Regarding H. maritimum species, in coleoptile, the increase in magnesium content was higher when the primed seeds with CaCl2 were exposed to 200 mM NaCl (74%). However, the best stimulation in radicle belonged to primed seeds with KNO3 subjected to 100 mM NaCl (31%) in comparison with their stressed unprimed equivalents.

Potassium

The potassium content was affected by salt stress in the absence of a priming treatment (Table 2). The 200 mM NaCl treatment reduced the content of this nutrient by 50% and 33.8% in coleoptile, and by 80.7% and 25% in radicle, in H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, as compared with their untreated controls. However, seed priming with KCl, KNO3, or CaCl2 had an effective role at improving the potassium concentration in the seedlings from both species subjected to either 100 mM or 200 mM NaCl. In fact, under the effect of 200 mM, this improvement was more important in the coleoptile of seedling from seeds primed with KNO3 (46.2%) and in the radicle of those primed with CaCl2 (33%) compared with the seedling from unprimed stressed equivalents of H. vulgare (L. Manel). Regarding H. maritimum species, the best rate of enhancement belonged to the seedlings primed with CaCl2 subjected to 200 mM NaCl. They reached 25.7% and 27.7% in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively, in comparison with the stressed unprimed equivalents (Table 2).

Sodium

It is noteworthy that, for unprimed seedlings, salt stress stimulated the absorption of sodium in both species (Table 2).As apparent from the measured values, the accumulation of sodium ions was remarkably higher when the seeds of H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum were subjected to 200 mM NaCl compared with the untreated control. Interestingly, seed priming with several agents significantly decreased the sodium content in the seeds stressed with different salt treatments. As shown in Table 2, CaCl2 and KNO3 caused similar reduction rates for the sodium concentration, especially when the seeds were subjected to 100 mM NaCl, as compared with their stressed unprimed equivalent controls (Table 2).

Sodium/Potassium (Na/K) Ratio

Because of the significant increase in sodium content and decrease in potassium concentration, the salinity increased the sodium/potassium ratio in the seedlings of both species (Table 2). However, seed priming with all agents decreased it. Nevertheless, CaCl2 and KNO3 seemed to be powerful agents for maintaining the potassium content and limiting sodium absorption. Thus, they decreased the sodium/potassium ratio in the primed barley seeds germinated with several salt doses compared with the unprimed ones. Their improvement was markedly noted in H. vulgare (L. Manel) submitted to 100 mM NaCl, compared with their stressed controls (Table 2).

2.3. Effect of Seed Priming on Seedling Electrolyte Leakage

As shown in Figure 5, under unprimed conditions, both salt concentrations significantly increased electrolyte leakage in the seedlings of both barley species. The 200 mM NaCl treatment increased the membrane stability index (MSI) levels by 110% and 30% in the radicle and by 56% and 45% in the coleoptile for H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum, respectively, as compared with the control. Interestingly, we noted that the MSI levels were lower in the seedlings from the seeds primed with all agents than in the unprimed controls under both salt treatments. This beneficial effect was more efficient when we applied seed priming with CaCl2 or KNO3. Both agents were able to provide a similar decrease in the radicle and coleoptile electrolyte leakage of H. vulgare (L. Manel) and H. maritimum species subjected to either 100 mM or 200 mM NaCl (Figure 5).

2.4. Effect of Seed Priming onLipid Peroxidation

The results demonstrated that the exposure of unprimed seeds of both barley species to different salt treatments exhibited a significant increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels when compared with the control (Figure 6). This increase was observed when the seeds were subjected to 200 mM NaCl. This salt concentration promoted MDA accumulation by 68.1% and 79.6% in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively, of H. maritimum seedlings compared with their controls. Nevertheless, this stimulation was even more prominent in H. vulgare (L. Manel), with an increase of about 160.3% and 197.6% in comparison with their controls in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively. Seedlings derived from primed seeds were less affected by salinity. In particular, in H. vulgare (L. Manel), CaCl2 seemed to be the best compound, playing a crucial role in alleviating salinity’s harmful effect. It reduced MDA values by 63% and 72% in the coleoptile and radicle, respectively, when seeds were subjected to 200 mM NaCl compared with the control. Regarding H. maritimum seeds exposed to 200 mM NaCl, a similar significant decrease in the MDA content was recorded in the seedlings from primed seeds with CaCl2 and those soaked in KNO3 compared with its content in the seedlings from unprimed stressed seeds (Figure 6).

2.5. Pearson’s Correlation Matrix Analysis

Pearson’s correlation matrix considered all traits including the FG%, growth parameters (length and dry weight), mineral elements analysis, membrane stability index (MSI), and MDA content for both barley species H. vulgare (L. Manel) (Table 3) and H. maritimum (Table 4). The results shown for the correlations matrix are concomitant with those obtained from the trait-by-trait analyses. In fact, we noticed a significant effect of all parameters measured in the unprimed seeds of H. vulgare (L. Manel) species subjected to 200 mM NaCl treatment. Under these restrictive conditions, the results showed that this salt concentration was negatively correlated with FG%, length, and dry weight, especially in the coleoptile length (Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = −0.615) and radicle dry weight (r = −0.6708). The results also demonstrated a great reduction in essential nutrient content, notably in the coleoptile potassium content (r = −0.809), iron concentration (r = −0.730), and magnesium concentration (r = −0.735). In contrast, a positive correlation for this salt treatment was markedly registered for sodium content, sodium/potassium ratio, MSI level, and MDA content (Table 3). In accordance with the trait-by-trait analyses results, under the effect of 100 mM NaCl, CaCl2 seed priming appeared to be the best agent, and was positively correlated with the majority of the parameters studied versus the remaining priming treatments (KCl or KNO3) (Table 3). Indeed, its effect was more significant in the radicle and coleoptile dry weight (r = 0.507 and 0.570, respectively), iron content (r = 0.262), and calcium concentration in the radicle (r = 0.313). However, it was negatively correlated with the sodium concentration and sodium/potassium ratio, and particularly with the coleoptile MSI (r = −0.446) and coleoptile MDA content (r = −0.396). In addition, for H. maritimum, the results shown by the correlations matrix demonstrated a prominent effect of 200 mM NaCl treatment in unprimed seedlings. We noticed a great reduction in FG%, dry weight, length, and essential element content against an increase of MDA, MSI, and sodium concentrations, as well as a stimulation of the sodium/potassium ratio (Table 4). In agreement with the trait-by-trait analyses of the results, treatment with 100 mM NaCl + CaCl2 appeared to be positively correlated with the majority of the parameters studied (Table 4).

3. Discussion

Successful and rapid seed germination is critical factor affecting crop production. These stages are the most sensitive to abiotic stress, especially salt stress [7]. As shown in our results, Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) and Hordeum maritimum seedlings from unprimed seeds exhibited classical responses to the deleterious effects of salinity. While salt stress affected the development of all seedlings from unprimed seeds, the domesticated glycophyte species suffered more than the native halophyte one. In fact, the dry weight of the radicle and coleoptile was reduced under the effect of 200 mM NaCl. In addition, salt initiated a great decrease in the radicle and coleoptile lenght. Our study is in agreement with previous studies, showing that glycophytes are sensitive to salinity during germination and seedling growth, and that they could not survive under high salinity conditions [39]. In fact, salinity reduces major glycophyte crop germination, growth, and production, such as corn, wheat, soybean, sorghum, oat, barley, potato, and sugar beet [40]. This effect is caused by an osmotic stress, by which salinity increases the external osmotic potential that limits the seedlings’ capacity for water absorption and thus inhibits its cell growth [41]. In addition, salinity may affect the germination of seeds through the toxic effects of an excess amount of sodium and chloride ions on embryo viability [42,43]. Thus, toxic ion accumulation reduces the efficiency of seed reserve mobilization during germination and blocks the transport of essential nutrient [44]. Indeed, as mentioned above, salt treatment remarkably decreased the essential nutrient content such as the concentration of potassium and magnesium in coleoptile, in addition to the radicle calcium concentration. In contrast, it stimulated the sodium/potassium ratio in the radicle and coleoptile. A high amount of accumulated sodium and decreased calcium level in NaCl-treated seedlings may be caused by sodium replacement of calcium in the cell walls and vacuoles [45,46]. Moreover, despite potassium being generally regarded as a main competitor of sodium in uptake and transport, the content of this element decreased in stressed seedlings, which induced potassium leakage and competition with sodium [5]. Furthermore, seedlings from the seeds treated with 200 mM NaCl had a higher level of electrolyte leakage (MSI) and malondialdehyde content (MDA) in the radicle and coleoptile compared with the untreated seeds. This increase is a sign of membrane damage at a cellular level under salt stress and serves as an important oxidative stress indicator resulting in the inhibition of seed germination [47,48]. In addition, many previous studies have indicated that salt stress induces the production of reactive oxygen derivatives (ROS) resulting in the peroxidation of mitochondrial lipids, loss of membrane integrity, and degradation of proteins and inactivation of enzymes [47]. Data have shown that H. maritimum species suffered less decline in potassium concentration compared with H. vulgare (L. Manel). Therefore, the sodium/potassium ratio in H. maritimum is lower than that observed in H. vulgare seedlings. These results further support the idea that the salt tolerance of H. maritimum may be based on maintaining the seedling sodium/potassium balance [49,50]. Interestingly, the higher degree of salt tolerance of H. maritimum compared with H. vulgare was coupled to its higher competence to preserve the membrane integrity. In fact, our results showed that the seedlings of the native species occurred at lower values of MDA and electrolyte leakage than the cultivated ones. Previous investigation by Seckin et al. proved that the MDA content and electrolyte leakage changed in H. maritimum only at a high salt concentration (200 and 300 mM NaCl); furthermore, in H. vulgare, these two parameters decreased even under low salinity levels, because of oxidative damage [51]. At the present time, seed priming is a low cost and low environment risk technique used to enhance growth under both favorable and unfavorable conditions [52]. Additionally, this approach is helpful to overcome salinity problems in the agricultural area by alleviating dormancy and promoting seed germination and seedling establishment under stressful conditions [53]. Furthermore, it provides faster and more synchronized germination of a great number of crops, such as tomato [14], without deteriorating natural resources. The overall results proved that, although the effects of different priming agents differed, all of them had the capacity to alleviate the stressful impact of salinity, and promoted the germination of barley seeds under salt stress with a little extent of difference. Yet, it is imperative to mention that this improvement occurs in a salt concentration-, priming agent-, and species-dependent manner. In this context, it was proven that seed priming is able to reduce the physical resistance of the endosperm during imbibition, to repair membranes, and to develop immature embryos [54]. The results of our experiment were consistent with several research works in this area. Ruan et al. showed that seed priming with KCl and CaCl2 enhanced several germination parameters in rice via induction of the mitotic activity and limitation of the absorption of sodium and chloride ions [26]. Similarly, Iqbal et al. reported that seed priming with KCl and CaCl2 alleviated salt stress damage in maize, thereby increasing the shoot and dry fresh weight [55]. In addition, Nasri et al. revealed that lettuce seeds soaked with KNO3 or CaCl2 and germinated under salt stress generally increased calcium metabolism and transport in tissues [13]. Additionally, priming with a potassium nitrate solution showed advantageous effects on the germination and growth rate of a wide range of crops under stressful environments, such as tomato [56] and pepper [54]. In addition, investigation in the impact of seed priming on some germination aspects in canola showed that seed priming with KCl 2% increased the root dry weight and mean germination rate at suitable priming times, and enhanced faster seedling establishment and improved plant tolerance against adverse environmental conditions [57].
The effective impact of CaCl2 pretreatment in barley seeds observed in the current work could be explained by the fact that calcium is known to be one of the most important essential nutrients necessary for plant growth and stress tolerance enhancement [58]. During germination, calcium ions play an important role in the regulation of plant metabolism, and maintain the intracellular potassium and sodium ion balance, which lead to an alleviation of the toxic sodium ion effects and to an improvement of salt tolerance [59]. In addition, when plants are exposed to NaCl treatments, the concentration of intracellular calcium ions increases rapidly, and Köster et al. proved that calcium ions coordinate the response to salt stress at cellular levels [60]. In this context, Jafar et al. reported that although different agents of priming improved the tolerance of wheat to salinity, CaCl2 was the most effective compound compared with ascorbic acid, salicylic acid, and kinetin [61]. However, potassium ions are not able to play a similar physiological role as the second messengers [62]. Taken together, these beneficial effects of calcium ions make calcium chloride priming the best treatment for barley seed germination under salt stress. Furthermore, rapid hydration may cause the leakage of essential nutrients out of the seed during germination, resulting in seed damage in some species at higher stress treatments [63].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Growth Conditions

Two barley species, H. maritimum (wild) and H.vulgare (L. Manel) (cultivated), were used throughout the experiment. Hordeum maritimum seeds (=H. marinium Huds. subs. Marinum, 2n + 14) were collected from Kalbia Sebkha (an intermittent in Tunisia that covers 8000 hectares in Sousse governorate at 35°’50′34” North, 10°’16′18” East South of Kondar); however, Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) seeds were provided by the National Institute of Agronomy of Tunis (INAT). The study was conducted in the Extremophile Plants Laboratory (LPE) of the Biotechnology Center of Borj Cedria (CBBC), Tunisia. Uniform barley seeds were selected and disinfected for 8 min with sodium hypochlorite (2%, v/v), then, they were abundantly rinsed with distilled water. Then, the seeds were soaked in distilled water (unprimed seeds), primed with 5 mM of CaCl2 solution for 20 h, or soaked with 270 mM KNO3 or 200 mM KCl for 40 h. The concentrations and times of the priming agents were chosen based on our own preliminary test, later confirmed by a comparison with previous investigations such, as in sorghum [64] and rice [65]. Finally, the seeds were placed in 20 Petri dishes moistened with a double layer of ashless filter paper*with 25 seeds for each treatment. The Petri dishes were moistened with three different saline concentrations consisting of 0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl, and were placed in a germinator at 20 °C, in the dark, for seven days.

4.2. Germination Parameters

4.2.1. Final Germination Percentage (FG %)

FG% was calculated from 20 repetitions of each treatment, as described by Nasri et al., based on the following equation [13]:
FG% = (total germinated seeds/total number of seeds) * 100

4.2.2. Mean Daily Germination (MDG)

According to Osborne (1993): MDG = Germination rate/Xth test day [66].

4.3. Seedlings Growth

At the end of the experiment, 10 seedlings from each treatment were harvested and rinsed carefully in many baths of distilled water. For seedling growth, independent length and dry matter measurements were performed on separated coleoptiles and radicles. The length was measured with a ruler and the dry weight (DW) was determined after desiccation at 80 °C for 72 h in an oven using a precision balance (Mettler type AE100 at 1/100 of mg).

4.4. Nutrient Extraction and Analysis

First, 20 mg of dried plant material was digested with 10 mL of sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 1N) for 1 h at 80 °C, and then left overnight at room temperature (five repetitions for each treatment).This allowed for the total extraction of the target elements of the samples. The iron, magnesium, and calcium were analyzed using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Analyst 300, Rodgau, Germany). However, the potassium and sodium ions were determined using a flame photometer (BWB Technologies XP, France).The results were expressed in μg·g−1 DW for and in mg·g−1 DW for the magnesium, calcium, potassium, and sodium, according to the method illustrated by Farhat et al. [67].

4.5. Electrolyte Leakage

Electrolyte leakage was estimated by measuring the membrane stability index (MSI) using a digital conductivity meter (BANTE instruments 950, China). Ten repetitions were carried on for each treatment. Initially, we cut 0.2 g of fresh material and placed it in falcon tubes filled with 10 mL of distilled water and heated it at 32 °C for 30 min, and finally, we recorded the electrical conductivity (EC1). The conductivity (EC2) was also assayed after placing the samples at 100 °C for 2 h. The MSI was calculated according to Dionioese and Tobita, using the following formula Equation (1) [68].
MSI   = ( EC 1 EC 2 ) 100
EC1: electrical conductivity measured at the first time
EC2: electrical conductivity measured at the second time

4.6. Malondialdehyde Content (MDA)

The level of lipid peroxidation was measured as the 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (mainly malondialdehyde) according to Bueg and Aust [69]. Frozen samples (1 g of fresh material, five repetitions for each treatment) were homogenized with a pre-chilled mortar and pestle with 10 mL of (0, 1%; p/v) trichloroacetic acid, and were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min and at 25 °C. Then, 1mL of the upper liquid layer (supernatant) was added to 4 mL thiobarbituric acid (TBA) (0, 5 %; p/v). After centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min, the supernatant absorbance was read (532 nm) and the values corresponding to non-specific absorption (600 nm) were subtracted. The MDA concentration was calculated using its molar extinction coefficient (155 mM−1·cm−1) according to the following formula Equation (2):
M D A   ( n m / g F W ) = ( ( D O 532 D O 600 )   V S 0.155 ) F W  

4.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with the “XLSTAT” software (version 2014). The mean values and standard error (SE) were obtained from at least 20 replicates for the factors of germination (FG%, MDG); 10 replicates for length, dry weight, and electrolyte leakage (MSI); and from 5 replicates for the ion content and MDA, and were analyzed using Duncan’s multiple range test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Pearson’s correlation analysis was done based on principal component analysis (PCA) using XLSTAT software, considering the variables centered on their means and normalized with a standard deviation of 1.
*: One of our objectives was to analyze the ion content, so we used a specific paper called ashless filter paper. This type of paper does not interfere with the germination process and does not contain elements that could be absorbed by the seeds.

5. Conclusions

This work led us to conclude that salinity stress decreased the germination parameters and seedling growth of both barley species, and were associated with a significant reduction of essential nutrient mobilization, an intensive increase of sodium content, and a stimulation of electrolyte leakage and MDA levels. Hazardous impacts of salinity were more pronounced for the H. vulgare (L. Manel) species. H. maritimum was able to maintain its germinative and physiological parameters by developing different defense mechanisms. Under salinity, different priming treatments promoted barley germination and seedling growth, and provoked a greater stress tolerance of primed seeds to different extents. Principal component analysis and Pearson’s correlation analysis clearly indicated that CaCl2 priming was better than the other priming agents due to its positive effects on the germination and growth traits. Bearing in mind that primed seeds with several agents of both barley species may respond differently to salt treatments, it will be necessary to continue this work at a later developmental stage. Further research is necessary to determine the ability of these agents to promote plant growth under permanent salt stress conditions.

Author Contributions

The contribution of each one of the seven authors is as follows: R.B.Y.: experimental work; analysis and data interpretation; statistical analysis; writing—original draft preparation. N.J.: data analysis; co-wrote the manuscript. N.B.: experimental work. A.A.: revised the paper. C.M.: revised the paper. F.P.A.: co-supervised the work. C.A.: coordinated physiological experiments; supervised the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was conducted in the Laboratory of Extremophile Plants (LPE: Laboratoire des Plantes Extrémophiles, Tunisia) of the Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC: Centre de Biotechnologie de Borj- Cedria, Tunisia), and supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (LR15CBBC02).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Authors comply with the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hubbard, M.; Germida, J.; Vujanovic, V. Fungal endophytes improve wheat seed germination under heat and drought stress. Botany 2012, 90, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saito, T.; Matsukura, C.; Ban, Y.; Shoji, K.; Sugiyama, M.; Fukuda, N.; Nishimura, S. Salinity stress affects assimilate metabolism at the gene-expression level during fruit development and improves fruit quality in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 77, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gong, B.; Wen, D.; Vanden Langenberg, K.; Wei, M.; Yang, F.; Shi, Q.; Wang, X. Comparative effects of NaCl and NaHCO3 stress on photosynthetic parameters, nutrient metabolism, and the antioxidant system in tomato leaves. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 157, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xu, X.-Y.; Fan, R.; Zheng, R.; Li, C.-M.; Yu, D.-Y. Proteomic analysis of seed germination under salt stress in soybeans. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2011, 12, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Puyang, X.; An, M.; Han, L.; Zhang, X. Protective effect of spermidine on salt stress induced oxidative damage in two Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) cultivars. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 117, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anaya, F.; Fghire, R.; Issa Ali, O.; Wahbi, S.; Loutfi, K. Effet du stress salin sur la germination de fève (Vicia faba L.). In Proceedings of the 5ème Rencontre Nationale Gestion et Protection de l’Environnement G-ENVIRO5, Casablanca, Morocco, 28 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Yadav, P.; Maya, K.; Zakwan, A. Seed priming mediated germination improvement and tolerance to subsequent exposure to cold and salt stress in capsicum. Res. J. Seed Sci. 2011, 4, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Omid, A.; Farzad, S.-Z. Osmo and hydro priming improvement germination characteristics and enzyme activity of Mountain Rye (Secale montanum) seeds under drought stress. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 8, 253–261. [Google Scholar]
  9. Borges, A.A.; Jiménez-Arias, D.; Expósito-Rodríguez, M.; Sandalio, L.M.; Pérez, J.A. Priming crops against biotic and abiotic stresses: MSB as a tool for studying mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Boukari, N.; Jelali, N.; Renaud, J.B.; Youssef, R.B.; Abdelly, C.; Hannoufa, A. Salicylic acid seed priming improves tolerance to salinity, iron deficiency and their combined effect in two ecotypes of Alfalfa. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 167, 103820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kazemi, K.; Eskandari, H. Does priming improve seed performance under salt and drought stress. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 3503–3507. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gholami, M.; Mokhtarian, F.; Baninasab, B. Seed halopriming improves the germination performance of black seed (Nigella sativa) under salinity stress conditions. J. Crop. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 18, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nasri, N.; Kaddour, R.; Mahmoudi, H.; Baatour, O.; Bouraoui, N.; Lachaâl, M. The effect of osmopriming on germination, seedling growth and phosphatase activities of lettuce under saline condition. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 14366–14372. [Google Scholar]
  14. Navin, P.; Pravin, P.; Kumar, T.S. Osmopriming of tomato genotypes with polyethylene glycol 6000 induces tolerance to salinity stress. Biosciences 2014, 7, 4412–4417. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abraha, B.; Yohannes, G. The role of seed priming in improving seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under salt stress at field conditions. Agric. Sci. 2013, 4, 666–672. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tabatabaei, S. The effect of priming on germination indexes and seed reserve utilization of maize seeds under salinity stress. Seed Res. (J. Seed Sci. Technol.) 2014, 3, 44. [Google Scholar]
  17. Paparella, S.; Araújo, S.; Rossi, G.; Wijayasinghe, M.; Carbonera, D.; Balestrazzi, A. Seed priming: State of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1281–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farhoudi, R.; Saeedipour, S.; Mohammadreza, D. The effect of NaCl seed priming on salt tolerance, antioxidant enzyme activity, proline and carbohydrate accumulation of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) under saline condition. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 1363–1370. [Google Scholar]
  19. Song, J.-Y.; Roe, J.-H. The role and regulation of Trxl, a cytosolic thioredoxin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 408–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Elphick, C.; Sanders, D.; Maathuis, F. Critical role of divalent cations and Na+ efflux in Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2001, 24, 733–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shabala, S.; Demidchik, V.; Shabala, L.; Cuin, T.A.; Smith, S.J.; Miller, A.J.; Davies, J.M.; Newman, I.A. Extracellular Ca2+ ameliorates NaCl-induced K+ loss from Arabidopsis root and leaf cells by controlling plasma membrane K+-permeable channels. Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 1653–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Joshi, N.; Jain, A.; Arya, K. Alleviation of salt stress in Cucumis sativus L. through seed priming with calcium chloride. Indian J. Appl. Res. 2011, 3, 22–25. [Google Scholar]
  23. Verma, J.; Srivastava, A. Physiological basis of salt stress resistance in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.)-II. Pre-sowing seed soaking treatment in regulating early seedling metabolism during seed germination. Plant Physiol. Bio-Chem.-New Delhi 1998, 25, 89–94. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kaya, C.; Ak, B.E.; Higgs, D. Response of salt-stressed strawberry plants to supplementary calcium nitrate and/or potassium nitrate. J. Plant Nutr. 2003, 26, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Elouaer, M.A.; Hannachi, C. Seed priming to improve germination and seedling growth of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) under salt stress. Eur. Asian J. Biosci. 2012, 6, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ruan, S.; Xue, Q.; Tylkowska, K. The influence of priming on germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds and seedling emergence and performance in flooded soil. Seed Sci. Technol. 2002, 30, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  27. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Photosynthesis: Physiological and ecological considerations. Plant Physiol. 2002, 9, 172–174. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rabhi, M.; Ferchichi, S.; Jouini, J.; Hamrouni, M.H.; Koyro, H.-W.; Ranieri, A.; Abdelly, C.; Smaoui, A. Phyto desalination of a salt-affected soil with the halophyte Sesuvium portulacastrum L. to arrange in advance the requirements for the successful growth of a glycophytic crop. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 6822–6828. [Google Scholar]
  29. Abdelly, C.; Lachaâl, M.; Grignon, C.; Soltani, A.; Hajji, M. Association épisodiqued’halophytes stricts et de glycophytes dans un écosystème hydromorphesaléen zone semi-aride. Agronomie 1995, 15, 557–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hafsi, C.; Lakhdhar, A.; Rabhi, M.; Debez, A.; Abdelly, C.; Ouerghi, Z. Interactive effects of salinity and potassium availability on growth, water status, and ionic composition of Hordeum maritimum. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zavariyan, A.M.; Rad, M.Y.; Asghari, M. Effect of seed priming by potassium nitrate on germination and biochemical indices in Silybummarianum L. under salinity stress. Int. J. Life Sci. 2015, 9, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hessini, K.; Ferchichi, S.; Ben Youssef, S.; Werner, K.H.; Cruz, C.; Gandour, M. How does salinity duration affect growth and productivity of cultivated barley? Agron. J. 2015, 107, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shelden, M.C.; Dias, D.A.; Jayasinghe, N.S.; Bacic, A.; Roessner, U. Root spatial metabolite profiling of two genotypes of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) reveals differences in response to short-term salt stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3731–3745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Woodrow, P.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Annunziata, M.G.; Pacifico, S.; Iannuzzi, F.; Mirto, A.; D’Amelia, L.; Dell’Aversana, E.; Piccolella, S.; Fuggi, A.; et al. Durum wheat seedling responses to simultaneous high light and salinity involve a fine reconfiguration of amino acids and carbohydrate metabolism. Physiol. Plant. 2017, 159, 290–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Annunziata, M.G.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Woodrow, P.; Maximova, E.; Fuggi, A.; Carillo, P. Durum wheat roots adapt to salinity remodeling the cellular content of nitrogen metabolites and sucrose. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Flowers, T.J.; Troke, P.F.; Yeo, A.R. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1977, 28, 89–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shabala, S.; Munns, R. Salinity stress: Physiological constraints and adaptive mechanisms. Plant Stress Physiol. 2012, 1, 59–93. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chalbi, N.; Hessini, K.; Gandour, M.; Mohamed, S.N.; Smaoui, A.; Abdelly, C.; Youssef, N.B. Are changes in membrane lipids and fatty acid composition related to salt-stress resistance in wild and cultivated barley? J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parvaiz, A.; Satyawati, S. Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants—A review. Plant Soil Environ. 2008, 54, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peleg, Z.; Apse, M.P.; Blumwald, E. Engineering salinity and water-stress tolerance in crop plants: Getting closer to the field. Adv. Bot. Res. 2011, 57, 405–443. [Google Scholar]
  41. Munns, R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 25, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jahromi, F.; Aroca, R.; Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Influence of salinity on the in vitro development of glomus intraradices and on the in vivo physiological and molecular responses of mycorrhizal lettuce plants. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 55, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Daszkowska-Golec, A. Arabidopsis seed germination under abiotic stress as a concert of action of phytohormones. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2011, 15, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chartzoulakis, K.; Klapaki, G. Response of two greenhouse pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Sci. Hortic. 2000, 86, 247–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Proseus, T.E.; Boyer, J.S. Calcium deprivation disrupts enlargement of Chara corallina cells: Further evidence for the calcium pectate cycle. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3953–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Byrt, C.S.; Zhao, M.; Kourghi, M.; Bose, J.; Henderson, S.; Qiu, J.; Gilliham, M.; Schultz, C.; Schwarz, M.; Ramesh, S.; et al. Non-selective cation channel activity of aquaporin AtPIP2;1 regulated by Ca2+ and pH. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 802–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. El Mahi, H.; Pérez-Hormaeche, J.; De Luca, A.; Villalta, I.; Espartero, J.; Gámez-Arjona, F.; Fernández, J.L.; Bundó, M.; Mendoza, I.; Mieulet, D.; et al. A critical role of sodium flux via the plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger SOS1 in the salt tolerance of rice. Plant Physiol. 2019, 180, 1046–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Epstein, E.; Norlyn, J.D.; Rush, D.W.; Kingsbury, R.W.; Kelley, D.B.; Cunningham, G.A.; Wrona, A.F. Saline culture of crops: A genetic approach. Science 1980, 210, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ferchichi, S.; Hessini, K.; Dell’Aversana, E.; D’Amelia, L.; Woodrow, P.; Ciarmiello, L.F.; Fuggi, A.; Carillo, P. Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum maritimum respond to extended salinity stress displaying different temporal accumulation pattern of metabolites. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 1096–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Huang, L.; Kuang, L.; Li, X.; Wu, L.; Wu, D.; Zhang, G. Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal the reasons why Hordeum marinum has higher salt tolerance than Hordeum vulgare. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 156, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seckin, B.; Turkan, I.; Sekmen, A.H.; Ozfidan, C. The role of antioxidant defense systems at differential salt tolerance of hordeum marinum huds. (Sea barley grass) and Hordeum vulgare L. (cultivated barley). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 69, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jisha, K.C.; Vijayakumari, K.; Puthur, J.T. Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: An overview. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 1381–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Maiti, R.; Pramanik, K. Vegetable seed priming: A low cost, simple and powerful techniques for farmers’ livelihood. Int. J. Bio-Resour. Stress Manag. 2013, 4, 475–481. [Google Scholar]
  54. Batista, T.B.; Binotti, F.F.D.S.; Cardoso, E.D.; Bardiviesso, E.M.; Costa, E. Aspectos fisiológicos e qualidade de mudas da pimenteiraem respostaao vigor e condicionamento das sementes. Bragantia 2015, 74, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Iqbal, M.; Ashraf, M.; Jamil, A.; Ur-Rehman, S. Does seed priming induce changes in the levels of some endogenous plant hormones in hexaploid wheat plants under salt stress? J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2006, 48, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ebrahimi, R.; Ahmadizadeh, M.; Rahbarian, P. Enhancing stand establishment of tomato cultivars under salt stress condition. South West. J. Hortic. Biol. Environ. 2014, 5, 19–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Saeidi, M.R.; Abdolghaium, A.; Hassanzadeh, M.; Rouhi, A.; Nikzad, P. Investigation of seed priming on some germination aspects of different canola cultivars. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2008, 6, 188. [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu, W.; Yuan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xuan, Y.; Yan, Y. Effects of salt stress and exogenous Ca2+ on Na+ compartmentalization, ion pump activities of tonoplast and plasma membrane in Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. leaves. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2014, 36, 2183–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Anil, V.S.; Rajkumar, P.; Kumar, P.; Mathew, M. A plant Ca2+ pump, ACA2, relieves salt hypersensitivity in yeast: Modulation of cytosolic calcium signature and activation of adaptive Na+ homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 3497–3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Köster, P.; Wallrad, L.; Edel, K.H.; Faisal, M.; Alatar, A.A.; Kudla, J. The battle of two ions: Ca2+ signalling against Na+ stress. Plant Biol. 2019, 21, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Jafar, M.Z.; Farooq, M.; Cheema, M.; Afzal, I.; Basra, S.M.; Wahid, M.A.; Aziz, T.; Shahid, M. Improving the performance of wheat by seed priming under saline conditions. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2011, 198, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Manishankar, P.; Wang, N.; Köster, P.; Alatar, A.A.; Kudla, J. Calcium signaling during salt stress and in the regulation of ion homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 4215–4226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Nawaz, J.; Hussain, M.; Jabbar, A.; Nadeem, G.A.; Sajid, M.; Subtain, M.U.; Shabbir, I. Seed priming a technique. Int. J. Agric. Crop. Sci. 2013, 6, 1373. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shehzad, M.; Ayub, M.; Ahmad, A.; Yaseen, M. Influence of priming techniques on emergence and seedling growth of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). J. Anim. Plant. Sci. 2012, 22, 154–158. [Google Scholar]
  65. Ruttanaruangboworn, A.; Chanprasert, W.; Tobunluepop, P.; Onwimol, D. Effect of seed priming with different concentrations of potassium nitrate on the pattern of seed imbibition and germination of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Integr. Agric. 2017, 16, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Osborne, J.; Fox, J.; Mercer, S. Germination response under elevated salinities of six semi-arid bluebush species (Western Australia). In Towards the Rational Use of High Salinity Tolerant Plants; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1993; pp. 323–338. [Google Scholar]
  67. Farhat, N.; Sassi, H.; Zorrig, W.; Abdelly, C.; Barhoumi, Z.; Smaoui, A.; Rabhi, M. Is excessive Ca the main factor responsible for Mg deficiency in Sulla carnosa on calcareous soils? J. Soils Sediments 2015, 15, 1483–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dionisio-Sese, M.L.; Tobita, S. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic responses of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 2000, 157, 54–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Buege, J.A.; Aust, S.D. Microsomal lipid peroxidation. In Methods in Enzymology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978; pp. 302–310. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the final germination rate (FG%) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel),subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 1. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the final germination rate (FG%) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel),subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g001
Figure 2. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the mean daily germination (MDG) in Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 2. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the mean daily germination (MDG) in Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g002aPlants 10 02264 g002b
Figure 3. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the radicle length and coleoptile length of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 3. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the radicle length and coleoptile length of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 20 replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g003aPlants 10 02264 g003b
Figure 4. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the dry weight (DW) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are the means of 10 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 4. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the dry weight (DW) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are the means of 10 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g004aPlants 10 02264 g004b
Figure 5. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the membrane stability index (MSI) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 m MNaCl) for 7 days in the germination stage. Values are the means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 5. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the membrane stability index (MSI) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 m MNaCl) for 7 days in the germination stage. Values are the means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g005
Figure 6. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the malondialdehyde content (MDA) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Figure 6. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the malondialdehyde content (MDA) on the radicle and coleoptile of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage. Values are means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Plants 10 02264 g006
Table 1. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the total Fe, Ca, and Mg content on the radicle (R) and coleoptile (Co) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage.
Table 1. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the total Fe, Ca, and Mg content on the radicle (R) and coleoptile (Co) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for 7 days at the germination stage.
Treatment (mM NaCl)C (Unprimed Seeds) + 0C (Unprimed Seeds) + 100C (Unprimed Seeds) + 200KCl + 100KCl + 200KNO3 + 100KNO3 + 200CaCl2 + 100CaCl2 + 200
H.vulgare (L. Manel)
Fe Co (mg/gDW)4994 ± 29 a2639 ± 141 c1414 ± 213 e3009 ± 331 bc2235 ± 126 d2974 ± 331 bc2540 ± 309 cd3359 ± 249 b2679 ± 357 c
Fe R (mg/gDW)2920 ± 45 a1919 ± 161 d1276 ± 90 f2688 ± 199 b1784 ± 102 e2524 ± 202 b2116 ± 79 cd2912 ± 128 a2292 ± 178 c
Ca Co (mg/gDW)18.25 ± 1.2 a11.68 ± 0.59 d7.60 ± 0.59 e14.91 ± 0.7 c11.04 ± 0.55 d13.63 ± 0.79 c11.10 ± 1.24 d19.75 ± 1.03 a16.66 ± 1.73 b
Ca R (mg/gDW)14.93 ± 0.9 c8.84 ± 1.14 f5.66 ± 1.14 g11.3 ± 0.74 de10.21 ± 0.76 e12.8 ± 1.36 cd1146 ± 0.9 de17.94 ± 0.78 a13.32 ± 1.26 b
Mg Co (mg/gDW)22.73 ± 1.5 a16.19 ± 1.11 d10.65 ± 1.11 e20.51 ± 1.14 b18.73 ± 1.37 bc20.16 ± 1.6 bc18.15 ± 0.68 c24.09 ± 1.68 a24.26 ± 1.7 a
Mg R (mg/gDW)25.15 ± 1.33 a17.58 ± 0.74 c11.62 ± 0.74 d23.5 ± 1.98 ab18.96 ± 0.99 c22.17 ± 2.36 b17.33 ± 0.4 c25.43 ± 2.26 a23.5 ± 1.99 ab
H. maritimum
Fe Co (mg/gDW)1178 ± 34 a851 ± 26 e725 ± 19.04 f1051 ± 43 b896 ± 50 de1041 ± 41 b953 ± 18 c1022 ± 37 b918 ± 35 cd
Fe R (mg/gDW)992 ± 24 b921 ± 43 c646 ± 33.92 f916 ± 60 c737 ± 38 e982 ± 45 bc838 ± 31 d1055 ± 42 a936 ± 44 bc
Ca Co (mg/gDW)0.887 ± 0.049 a0.579 ± 0.06 cd0.373 ± 0.057 e0.639 ± 0.055 bc0.526 ± 0.060 d0.605 ± 0.055 c0.525 ± 0.031 d0.855 ± 0.042 a0.711 ± 0.035 b
Ca R (mg/gDW)0.391 ± 0.023 ab0.314 ± 0.030 c0.181 ± 0.03 e0.323 ± 0.031 c0.199 ± 0.026 e0.359 ± 0.015 b0.194 ± 0.013 e0.417 ± 0.025 a0.238 ± 0.023 d
Mg Co (mg/gDW)0.228 ± 0.026 a0.187 ± 0.017 c0.115 ± 0.017 e0.186 ± 0.024 c0.141 ± 0.009 de0.158 ± 0.017 d0.166 ± 0.016 d0.227 ± 0.016 ab0.2 ± 0.018 b
Mg R (mg/gDW)0.217 ± 0.024 a0.166 ± 0.009 c0.113 ± 0.009 f0.186 ± 0.013 b0.149 ± 0.013 d0.218 ± 0.017 a0.134 ± 0.008 e0.202 ± 0.017 ab0.146 ± 0.017 d
Values are means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Table 2. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the Na and K content and Na/K ratio on the radicle (R) and coleoptile (Co) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for7 days at the germination stage.
Table 2. Effect of KCl, KNO3, and CaCl2 seed priming on the Na and K content and Na/K ratio on the radicle (R) and coleoptile (Co) of two barley species, Hordeum maritimum and Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel), subjected to various salt concentrations (0, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) for7 days at the germination stage.
Treatment (mM NaCl)C (Unprimed Seeds) + 0C (Unprimed Seeds) + 100C (Unprimed Seeds) + 200KCl + 100KCl + 200KNO3 + 100KNO3 + 200CaCl2 + 100CaCl2 + 200
H.vulgare (L. Manel)
Na Co (mg/gDW)0.066 ± 0.005 g0.879 ± 0.049 d1.63 ± 0.042 a0.67 ± 0.06 e1.262 ± 0.043 b0.617 ± 0.091 ef0.912 ± 0.052 d0.566 ± 0.051 f1.03 ± 0.07 c
Na R (mg/gDW)0.08 ± 0.011 h0.539 ± 0.023 d1.01 ± 0.023 a0.458 ± 0.037 b0.744 ± 0.031 b0.371 ± 0.044 f0.769 ± 0.05 b0.318 ± 0.033 g0.67 ± 0.027 c
K Co (mg/gDW)0.9 ± 0.036 a0.65 ± 0.02 c0.45 ± 0.013 e0.67 ± 0.03 bc0.599 ± 0.038 d0.719 ± 0.041 b0.658 ± 0.03 c0.695 ± 0.021 bc0.6 ± 0.016 d
K R (mg/gDW)0.778 ± 0.048 a0.365 ± 0.021 c0.15 ± 0.014 f0.391 ± 0.018 c0.2 ± 0.019 e0.453 ± 0.03 b0.228 ± 0.021 de0.403 ± 0.035 c0.26 ± 0.01 d
Na/K Co(mg/gDW)0.073 ± 0.007 g1.34 ± 0.116 d3.55 ± 0.058 a0.98 ± 0.089 e1.53 ± 0.153 c0.86 ± 0.142 ef1.924 ± 0.153 b0.814 ± 0.072 f1.29 ± 0.1 d
Na/K R (mg/gDW)0.054 ± 0.044 f1.46 ± 0.157 d6.739 ± 0.587 a1.16 ± 0.06 de3.75 ± 0.321 b0.824 ± 0.114 e3.414 ± 0.443 b0.807 ± 0.117 e2.573 ± 0.2 c
H. maritimum
Na Co (mg/gDW)0.114 ± 0.015 g1.397 ± 0.1 c1.936 ± 0.059 a1.091 ± 0.083 e1.568 ± 0.77 b0.935 ± 0.086 f1.418 ± 0.084 c0.959 ± 0.076 f1.24 ± 0.056 d
Na R (mg/gDW)0.134 ± 0.011 e0.942 ± 0.058 bc1.134 ± 0.058 a0.91 ± 0.044 c1.005 ± 0.029 b0.876 ± 0.066 d0.957 ± 0.029 bc0.871 ± 0.048 d0.87 ± 0.05 d
K Co (mg/gDW)1.296 ± 0.056 a1.191 ± 0.03 b0.871 ± 0.067 e1.206 ± 0.02 b1.009 ± 0.06 d1.24 ± 0.06 ab0.936 ± 0.069 de1.213 ± 0.034 b1.095 ± 0.02 c
K R (mg/gDW)0.963 ± 0.33 ab0.89 ± 0.034 bc0.720 ± 0.04 e0.966 ± 0.03 ab0.84 ± 0.059 de0.87 ± 0.049 c0.761 ± 0.058 e0.989 ± 0.045 a0.92 ± 0.03 b
Na/K Co(mg/gDW)0.088 ± 0.013 f1.173 ± 0.08 c2.265 ± 0.169 a0.90 ± 0.066 d1.561 ± 0.145 b0.751 ± 0.067 e1.520 ± 0.099 b0.792 ± 0.08 de1.13 ± 0.067 c
Na/K R (mg/gDW)0.217 ± 0.024 e0.166 ± 0.009 c0.113 ± 0.009 a0.186 ± 0.013 cd0.149 ± 0.013 b0.218 ± 0.017 cd0.134 ± 0.008 b0.202 ± 0.017 d0.146 ± 0.017 cd
Values are the means of 5 independent replicates ± standard error. Data with the same letter are not significantly different at p < 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
Table 3. Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) Pearson’s correlation matrix: C L: coleoptile length; R L: radicle length; C DW: coleoptile dry weight; R DW: radicle dry weight; C MSI: coleoptile membrane stability index; R MSI: radicle membrane stability index; C MDA: coleoptile malondialdehyde content; R MDA: radicle malondialdehyde content; C Ca: coleoptile calcium content; R Ca: radicle calcium content; C Mg: coleoptile magnesium content; R Mg: radicle magnesium content; C K: coleoptile potassium content; R K: radicle potassium content; C Fe: coleoptile iron content; R Fe: radicle iron content; C Na: coleoptile sodium content; R Na: radicle sodium content; C Na/K: coleoptile sodium/potassium ratio; R Na/K: radicle sodium/potassium ratio; FG %: final germination rate.
Table 3. Hordeum vulgare (L. Manel) Pearson’s correlation matrix: C L: coleoptile length; R L: radicle length; C DW: coleoptile dry weight; R DW: radicle dry weight; C MSI: coleoptile membrane stability index; R MSI: radicle membrane stability index; C MDA: coleoptile malondialdehyde content; R MDA: radicle malondialdehyde content; C Ca: coleoptile calcium content; R Ca: radicle calcium content; C Mg: coleoptile magnesium content; R Mg: radicle magnesium content; C K: coleoptile potassium content; R K: radicle potassium content; C Fe: coleoptile iron content; R Fe: radicle iron content; C Na: coleoptile sodium content; R Na: radicle sodium content; C Na/K: coleoptile sodium/potassium ratio; R Na/K: radicle sodium/potassium ratio; FG %: final germination rate.
Treatments 100 mM NaCl200 mM NaCl100 mM NaCl + KCl 200 mM NaCl + KCl 100 mM NaCl + KNO3200 mM NaCl + KNO3100 mM NaCl + CaCl2200 mM NaCl + CaCl2
Parameter
C L−0.172−0.6150.099−0.2220.351−0.1020.4720.190
R L0.058−0.5370.253−0.4050.146−0.2040.5540.134
C DW−0.298−0.5650.140−0.3020.407−0.1430.5700.191
R DW−0.318−0.6700.237−0.2360.308−0.0810.5070.253
C MSI0.2700.6420.0380.274−0.313−0.049−0.446−0.416
R MSI0.0980.708−0.1300.333−0.383−0.155−0.282−0.189
C MDA0.3280.766−0.1080.154−0.313−0.152−0.396−0.278
R MDA0.2260.751−0.3480.254−0.133−0.022−0.409−0.319
C Ca−0.164−0.5800.164−0.2300.034−0.2240.6570.342
R Ca −0.293−0.626−0.031−0.1500.120−0.0190.6570.342
C Mg −0.252−0.7350.123−0.0310.092−0.0810.4350.449
R Mg −0.200−0.6910.287−0.0860.177−0.2210.4460.287
C Fe 0.020−0.7300.246−0.2270.225−0.0400.4610.044
R Fe−0.196−0.6640.363−0.2940.243−0.0520.5260.074
C K 0.096−0.8090.202−0.1610.3920.1090.281−0.112
R K 0.210−0.5560.301−0.3810.522−0.2810.344−0.160
C Na −0.0740.754−0.3040.347−0.363−0.037−0.4190.098
R Na −0.1210.684−0.2600.229−0.4080.272−0.5010.105
C Na/K−0.0860.901−0.246−0.004−0.3030.172−0.324−0.109
R Na/K−0.2210.814−0.2810.227−0.3470.161−0.350−0.003
TG%−0.065−0.7330.283−0.2390.196−0.1520.4570.254
Variables arecentered around their means and are normalized with a standard deviation of 1, n = 5. Values in bold represent significant correlations at the 0.05 level.
Table 4. Hordeum maritimum Pearson’s correlation matrix: C L: coleoptile length; R L: radicle length; C DW: coleoptile dry weight; R DW: radicle dry weight; C MSI: coleoptile membrane stability index; R MSI: radicle membrane stability index; C MDA: coleoptile malondialdehyde content; R MDA: radicle malondialdehyde content; C Ca: coleoptile calcium content; R Ca: radicle calcium content; C Mg: coleoptile magnesium content; R Mg: radicle magnesium content; C K: coleoptile potassium content; R K: radicle potassium content; C Fe: coleoptile iron content; R Fe: radicle iron content; C Na: coleoptile sodium content; R Na: radicle sodium content; C Na/K: coleoptile sodium/potassium ratio; R Na/K: radicle sodium/potassium ratio; FG %: final germination rate.
Table 4. Hordeum maritimum Pearson’s correlation matrix: C L: coleoptile length; R L: radicle length; C DW: coleoptile dry weight; R DW: radicle dry weight; C MSI: coleoptile membrane stability index; R MSI: radicle membrane stability index; C MDA: coleoptile malondialdehyde content; R MDA: radicle malondialdehyde content; C Ca: coleoptile calcium content; R Ca: radicle calcium content; C Mg: coleoptile magnesium content; R Mg: radicle magnesium content; C K: coleoptile potassium content; R K: radicle potassium content; C Fe: coleoptile iron content; R Fe: radicle iron content; C Na: coleoptile sodium content; R Na: radicle sodium content; C Na/K: coleoptile sodium/potassium ratio; R Na/K: radicle sodium/potassium ratio; FG %: final germination rate.
Treatments 100 mM NaCl200 mM NaCl100 mM NaCl + KCl200 mM NaCl + KCl 100 mM NaCl + KNO3200 mM NaCl + KNO3100 mM NaCl + CaCl2200 mM NaCl + CaCl2
Parameter
C L−0.099−0.2910.107−0.2430.107−0.2910.3630.347
R L−0.006−0.7790.121−0.1900.1950.1400.2870.232
C DW0.064−0.5520.137−0.2340.192−0.2620.5340.120
R DW−0.059−0.4100.099−0.4220.057−0.0160.5910.160
C MSI0.0900.626−0.0310.334−0.0970.097−0.497−0.521
R MSI0.2060.5110.1000.325−0.147−0.228−0.410−0.357
C MDA0.0600.536−0.4630.349−0.4260.219−0.4580.181
R MDA0.1780.731−0.1500.330−0.374−0.109−0.487−0.118
C Ca −0.058−0.6060.099−0.2010.009−0.2040.6710.290
R Ca 0.158−0.4300.198−0.3490.357−0.3720.614−0.177
C Mg 0.150−0.5850.133−0.318−0.150−0.0660.5520.284
R Mg 0.015−0.5370.222−0.1570.567−0.3120.394−0.192
C Fe−0.279−0.7140.410−0.1230.3750.0710.309−0.049
R Fe 0.120−0.6650.107−0.4050.294−0.1180.5030.163
C K 0.250−0.5940.291−0.2280.396−0.4230.310−0.001
R K 0.097−0.5720.361−0.1190.004−0.4170.4460.198
C Na 0.0850.731−0.2620.280−0.4400.110−0.412−0.091
R Na −0.0230.732−0.1180.227−0.2800.037−0.299−0.275
C Na/K−0.0690.780−0.2780.232−0.3980.200−0.366−0.100
R Na/K−0.0990.760−0.26220.149−0.1660.250−0.374−0.257
TG%0.027−0.5680.2434−0.2430.135−0.2700.4590.216
Variables were centered around their means and normalized with a standard deviation of 1, n = 5. Values in bold represent significant correlations at the 0.05 level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ben Youssef, R.; Jelali, N.; Boukari, N.; Albacete, A.; Martinez, C.; Alfocea, F.P.; Abdelly, C. The Efficiency of Different Priming Agents for Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Local Tunisian Barley under Salinity Stress. Plants 2021, 10, 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112264

AMA Style

Ben Youssef R, Jelali N, Boukari N, Albacete A, Martinez C, Alfocea FP, Abdelly C. The Efficiency of Different Priming Agents for Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Local Tunisian Barley under Salinity Stress. Plants. 2021; 10(11):2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112264

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ben Youssef, Rim, Nahida Jelali, Nadia Boukari, Alfonso Albacete, Cristina Martinez, Francisco Perez Alfocea, and Chedly Abdelly. 2021. "The Efficiency of Different Priming Agents for Improving Germination and Early Seedling Growth of Local Tunisian Barley under Salinity Stress" Plants 10, no. 11: 2264. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112264

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop