Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692
1
Department of Physics, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
2
Department of Philosophy, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
3
Department of Philosophy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
4
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, PA 17022, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Entropy 2022, 24(5), 674; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674
Submission received: 22 April 2022
/
Accepted: 29 April 2022
/
Published: 11 May 2022
The authors wish to make the following correction to this paper [1]:
The four Bell basis states, Equation (30) on p. 13, represent one “unlike state” and three “like states”, not two “unlike states” and two “like states”. Thus, the analysis and Figure 8 on pages 13 and 14 for “unlike states” apply to only the first state in Equation (30), and the analysis and Figure 9 on pages 13 and 14 for “like states” apply to the other three states in Equation (30).
The conclusion is the same for “unlike states” and “like states”, so it is unaffected by this change in wording about which states in Equation (30) correspond to “unlike” and “like states” in the analysis. The original publication has been updated.
Reference
- Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; McDevitt, T.; Kohler, I. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Stuckey, W.; Silberstein, M.; McDevitt, T.; Kohler, I. Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. Entropy 2022, 24, 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674
AMA Style
Stuckey W, Silberstein M, McDevitt T, Kohler I. Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692. Entropy. 2022; 24(5):674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674
Chicago/Turabian StyleStuckey, William, Michael Silberstein, Timothy McDevitt, and Ian Kohler. 2022. "Correction: Stuckey et al. Why the Tsirelson Bound? Bub’s Question and Fuchs’ Desideratum. Entropy 2019, 21, 692" Entropy 24, no. 5: 674. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24050674
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
