Next Article in Journal
Linguistic Laws in Speech: The Case of Catalan and Spanish
Previous Article in Journal
Streaming Feature Selection for Multi-Label Data with Dynamic Sliding Windows and Feature Repulsion Loss
Previous Article in Special Issue
Uncovering the Dependence of Cascading Failures on Network Topology by Constructing Null Models
Open AccessArticle

Predicting the Evolution of Physics Research from a Complex Network Perspective

1
School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371, Singapore
2
Complexity Institute, Nanyang Technological University, 61 Nanyang Drive, Singapore 637335, Singapore
3
Department of Computational Intelligence, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Ignacego Łukasiewicza 5, 50-371 Wrocław, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Entropy 2019, 21(12), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/e21121152
Received: 13 October 2019 / Revised: 16 November 2019 / Accepted: 19 November 2019 / Published: 26 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computation in Complex Networks)
The advancement of science, as outlined by Popper and Kuhn, is largely qualitative, but with bibliometric data, it is possible and desirable to develop a quantitative picture of scientific progress. Furthermore, it is also important to allocate finite resources to research topics that have the growth potential to accelerate the process from scientific breakthroughs to technological innovations. In this paper, we address this problem of quantitative knowledge evolution by analyzing the APS data sets from 1981 to 2010. We build the bibliographic coupling and co-citation networks, use the Louvain method to detect topical clusters (TCs) in each year, measure the similarity of TCs in consecutive years, and visualize the results as alluvial diagrams. Having the predictive features describing a given TC and its known evolution in the next year, we can train a machine learning model to predict future changes of TCs, i.e., their continuing, dissolving, merging, and splitting. We found the number of papers from certain journals, the degree, closeness, and betweenness to be the most predictive features. Additionally, betweenness increased significantly for merging events and decreased significantly for splitting events. Our results represent the first step from a descriptive understanding of the science of science (SciSci), towards one that is ultimately prescriptive. View Full-Text
Keywords: SciSci; knowledge evolution; machine learning SciSci; knowledge evolution; machine learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, W.; Saganowski, S.; Kazienko, P.; Cheong, S.A. Predicting the Evolution of Physics Research from a Complex Network Perspective. Entropy 2019, 21, 1152.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop