# On Ontological Alternatives to Bohmian Mechanics

^{1}

^{2}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Bohmian Mechanics and the Microrelational Interpretation in a Nutshell

## 3. Relational Entities

#### 3.1. Mathematical Relations

- One node has four neighbors.
- One node has two neighbors.
- One node has only one neighbor, which has three neighbors.
- One node has only one neighbor, which has four neighbors.
- One node has three neighbors of which one has one neighbor.
- One node has three neighbors of which one has two neighbors.

#### 3.2. Relational Space

#### 3.3. “To Be” in a Relational Space

#### 3.4. Complex Valued Relations

- In a neural network, the directed link between two nodes (which in this case are referred to as neurons) has a weight (the synaptic weight) which determines the transmission intensity of a signal. Negative weights indicate inhibitory influences. As the network is directed, the connection between two nodes is specified by two real-valued weights that can be combined into a complex number. These weights change over time as a result of learning.
- In so-called spiking neural networks, the signal consists of a firing rate (the number of spikes per unit of time) that is transmitted from one neuron to another. The time scales on which these firing rates change are much shorter than the time scales for changes in the synaptic weights, so that the synaptic weights can roughly be considered as constant. The connections (the synapses) between neurons are directed, but it often happens that connections exist in both directions. In addition, firing can occur in a synchronized way between clusters of neurons or asynchronous. Thus, the relative phases in spiking neurons can be important.
- On large scales (averaging over several hundreds of neurons), the activity in neural networks is sometimes described by a complex field (see, e.g., [27,28]). Together with David Bohm(!), the famous neuroscientist Karl Pribram developed a quantum field theoretic approach to consciousness [29], which was related to Bohm’s ideas of an implicate and explicate order [30].

## 4. One-Particle Quantum Mechanics

#### 4.1. The Generalized Relational Structure of “Location”

#### 4.2. The Dynamics of Relations

#### 4.3. The Double-Slit Experiment and “Sum over Histories”

#### 4.4. Measurements

#### 4.5. An “Every-Day” Example for Measurements and the Collapse

## 5. Many-Particle Systems and Entanglement

#### 5.1. General Remarks

#### 5.2. Relations for Two-Particle Systems

- Relations between spatial entities: these are considered to be non-directed and give rise, on a large scale, to the geometry of space.
- Relations between “particles” and spatial entities: these relations maybe directed and give rise, on a large scale, to the wave function.
- Relations between “particles”: These relations are present if the particles are entangled. They allow for a direct information transfer between particles and characterize the form of entanglement.

#### 5.3. Local or Non-Local, That Is the Question

## 6. Relational Space-Time—Relational Events

## 7. Conclusions

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Bohm, D.J. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Variables I & II. Phys. Rev.
**1952**, 85, 166. [Google Scholar] - Cushing, J.T.; Fine, A.; Goldstein, S. Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal; Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 184; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Dürr, D.; Teufel, S. Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Holland, P.R. The Quantum Theory of Motion: An Account of the DeBroglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Ghirardi, G.; Rimini, A.; Weber, T. A Model for a Unified Quantum Description of Macroscopic and Microscopic Systems. In Quantum Probability and Applications; Accardi, L., von Waldenfels, W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Ghirardi, G.; Rimini, A.; Weber, T. Unified Dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys. Rev. D
**1985**, 34, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Tumulka, R. A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber Model. J. Stat. Phys.
**2006**, 125, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Károlyházy, F. Gravitation and Quantum Mechanics of Macroscopic Objects. Nuovo Cimento
**1966**, 42, 1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Penrose, R. The Emperor’s New Mind; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Penrose, R. On the Gravitization of Quantum Mechanics 1: Quantum State Reduction. Found. Phys.
**2014**, 44, 557–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Pylkkänen, P.; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Private communication. Paavo Pylkkänen refers to a letter from D. Bohm to K. Popper, who had accused him of ‘saving determinism’. Bohm wrote “This is not about determinism, this is about ontology”.
- Bohm, D.J.; Hiley, B. The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory; Routledge: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Von Neumann, J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (orig. 1932), 1st ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1955. [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs, C.A. QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism. arXiv, 2010; arXiv:1003.5209. [Google Scholar]
- Bacciagaluppi, G. A Critic Looks at QBism. In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science; Galavotti, M., Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., Weber, M., Eds.; The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Rovelli, C. Relational Quantum Mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**1998**, 35, 1637–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filk, T. The Problem of Locality and a Relational Interpretation of the Wave Function. In Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations—3; Adenier Khrennikov, G., Yu, A., Nieuwenhuizen, T.M., Eds.; American Institute of Physics: Melville, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 305–311. [Google Scholar]
- Filk, T. Relational interpretation of the wave function and a possible way around Bell’s theorem. Int. J. Theor. Phys.
**2006**, 45, 1166–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filk, T. Relational Events and the Conflict Between Relativity and the Collapse. In Re-Thinking Time at the Interface of Physics and Philosophy—The Forgotten Present; Parmenides Book Series On Thinking; von Müller, A., Filk, T., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 67–91. [Google Scholar]
- Descartes, R. The Principles of Philosophy; (orig. 1644); Kessinger Pub. Co.: Whitefish, MT, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ariew, R. G.W. Leibniz and Samuel Clarke: Correspondence; Hackett Publishing Co. Inc.: Indianapolis, IN, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Albert, R.; Barabasi, L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys.
**2002**, 75, 47–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Billoire, A.; David, F. Scaling properties of randomly triangulated planar random surfaces: A numerical study. Nucl. Phys. B
**1986**, 275, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filk, T. Equivalence of Massive Propagator Distance and Mathematical Distance on Graphs. Mod. Phys. Lett. A
**1992**, 7, 2637–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filk, T. Random graph gauge theories as toy models for non-perturbative string theories. Class. Quantum Grav.
**2000**, 17, 4841–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Haykin, S. Neural Networks and Learning Machines, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall International: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Griffith, J.S. A field theory of neural nets I: Derivation of field equations. Bull. Math. Biophys.
**1963**, 25, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Griffith, J.S. A field theory of neural nets II: Properties of field equations. Bull. Math. Biophys.
**1965**, 27, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pribram, K. (Ed.) Rethinking Neural Networks: Quantum Fields and Biological Data; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Bohm, D.J. Wholeness and the Implicate Order; Routledge: London, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, C. Quantum Theory in Discrete Spacetime. Preprint UCLA. 2010. Available online: http://dfcd.net/articles/discrete.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2018).
- Šťovíček, P.; Tolar, J. Quantum Mechanics in Discrete Space-Time. Rep. Math. Phys.
**1984**, 20, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chung, F.R.K. Spectral Graph Theory, 2nd ed.; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Feynman, R.P.; Leighton, R.B.; Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics; Addison-Wesley Longman: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1965; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Kohonen, T. Self-Organized Formation of Topologically Correct Feature Maps. Biol. Cybern.
**1982**, 43, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cirel’son, B.S. Quantum Generalizations of Bell’s Inequality. Lett. Math. Phys.
**1980**, 4, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grinbaum, A. Reconstruction of quantum theory. Br. J. Philos. Sci.
**2007**, 58, 387–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Grinbaum, A. Quantum Correlations: Challenging the Tsirelson Bound. In Quantum Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., Pothos, E., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 9535, pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
- Popescu, S. Nonlocality beyond quantum mechanics. Nat. Phys.
**2014**, 10, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Popescu, S.; Rohrlich, D. Generic quantum nonlocality. Phys. Lett.
**1992**, 166, 293–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Filk, T. A mechanical model of a PR-box. arXiv, 2015; arXiv:1507.06789. [Google Scholar]
- Maldacena, J.; Susskind, L. Cool horizons for entangled black holes. Fortsch. Phys.
**2013**, arXiv:1306.053361, 781–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Einstein, A.; Podolsky, B.; Rosen, N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev.
**1935**, 47, 777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bombelli, L.; Lee, J.; Meyer, D.; Sorkin, R.D. Space-Time as a Causal Set. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**1987**, 59, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Sorkin, R.D. Light, Links and Causal Sets. Proc. DICE2008 Meet. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.
**2009**, 174, 012018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**A set with six points and undirected relations. In this case, the relations allow a unique identification of the elements.

**Figure 2.**The location of an object p in a relational structure is defined by the spatial points to which it is related. Equivalently, one can specify this relation by the characteristic function of this set of spatial points. If the relations of the object to ‘space’ are directed, we can specify it by two characteristic functions.

**Figure 3.**In a relational framework, a particle can be at two locations simultaneously. In the given example, the object p “is” at the points x and y simultaneously.

**Figure 4.**Propagation of relations: only via the intermediate step (

**b**) can the additional relation in (

**c**) be created from the relational space (

**a**).

**Figure 5.**In the double-slit experiment, the total amplitude can be obtained by assuming that aparticle propagates along path 1 AND path 2. In the micro-relational interpretation, the relations of a particle propagate along path 1 and path 2.

**Figure 6.**A server connected to a periphery of counters with printers is a model for a measurement in a relational system. A boarding pass exists only virtually as a program instruction in the server. Only when an e-ticket number is presented at a counter—this is the measurement—does the boarding pass become reality at the printer of this counter.

**Figure 7.**(

**left**) two objects in a relational structure. Each object has its own set of relations to the spatial points. The relations factorize; (

**right**) there can also be a direct relation between the two objects. This may lead to entanglement.

**Figure 8.**When there are several objects (in this case two), we have three different types of relations: (1) relations among spatial points, (2) relations between “particles” and spatial points, and (3) relations between the “particles”.

**Figure 9.**(

**left**) the events making up the canvas of “space-time” are endowed with a causal structure; (

**right**) a physical, object-related event can be related to the events of “space-time” in three different ways: It can be causally influenced by events in its past, it can influence events in its future and there may be “space-like” relations to events that are in the causal complement. The distinction between “space-like” events and time-like or light-like events depend on the real and imaginary parts of causal Green’s functions.

**Figure 10.**The lowest order approximation of a Coulomb scattering of two electrons by an exchange of a (virtual) photon. The points ${x}_{i}$ are kept fixed while one has to integrate over all possible positions of the intermediate events at ${y}_{1}$ and ${y}_{2}$.

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Filk, T.
On Ontological Alternatives to Bohmian Mechanics. *Entropy* **2018**, *20*, 474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060474

**AMA Style**

Filk T.
On Ontological Alternatives to Bohmian Mechanics. *Entropy*. 2018; 20(6):474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060474

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Filk, Thomas.
2018. "On Ontological Alternatives to Bohmian Mechanics" *Entropy* 20, no. 6: 474.
https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060474