Next Article in Journal
Stochasticity: A Feature for the Structuring of Large and Heterogeneous Image Databases
Next Article in Special Issue
Biosemiotic Entropy: Concluding the Series
Previous Article in Journal
Group Invariance of Information Geometry on q-Gaussian Distributions Induced by Beta-Divergence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deepening the Conception of Functional Information in the Description of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Entropy 2013, 15(11), 4748-4781;

The New Genetics and Natural versus Artificial Genetic Modification

Institute of Science in Society, 29 Tytherton Road, London N19 4PZ, UK
Received: 2 August 2013 / Revised: 9 October 2013 / Accepted: 10 October 2013 / Published: 4 November 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosemiotic Entropy: Disorder, Disease, and Mortality)
Full-Text   |   PDF [442 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]   |  


The original rationale and impetus for artificial genetic modification was the “central dogma” of molecular biology that assumed DNA carries all the instructions for making an organism, which are transmitted via RNA to protein to biological function in linear causal chains. This is contrary to the reality of the “fluid genome” that has emerged since the mid-1970s. In order to survive, the organism needs to engage in natural genetic modification in real time, an exquisitely precise molecular dance of life with RNA and DNA responding to and participating in “downstream” biological functions. Artificial genetic modification, in contrast, is crude, imprecise, and interferes with the natural process. It drives natural systems towards maximum biosemiotic entropy as the perturbations are propagated and amplified through the complex cascades of interactions between subsystems that are essential for health and longevity. View Full-Text
Keywords: central dogma; fluid genome; circular causation; biosemiotics central dogma; fluid genome; circular causation; biosemiotics

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ho, M.-W. The New Genetics and Natural versus Artificial Genetic Modification. Entropy 2013, 15, 4748-4781.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Entropy EISSN 1099-4300 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top