Next Article in Journal
The Landscape of the Genomic Distribution and the Expression of the F-Box Genes Unveil Genome Plasticity in Hexaploid Wheat during Grain Development and in Response to Heat and Drought Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Aerobic Exercise Ameliorates Cancer Cachexia-Induced Muscle Wasting through Adiponectin Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 22
Issue 6
10.3390/ijms22063109
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of the Resistance to Powdery Mildew and Leaf Rust Carried by the Bread Wheat Cultivar Victo

by
Francesca Desiderio
1,*,
Salim Bourras
2,3,
Elisabetta Mazzucotelli
1,
Diego Rubiales
4,
Beat Keller
2,
Luigi Cattivelli
1 and
Giampiero Valè
5
1
CREA Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, 29017 Fiorenzuola d’Arda, Italy
2
Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland
3
Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75651 Uppsala, Sweden
4
Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, CSIC, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
5
DiSIT—Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(6), 3109; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063109
Submission received: 11 February 2021 / Revised: 2 March 2021 / Accepted: 12 March 2021 / Published: 18 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Leaf rust and powdery mildew are two important foliar diseases in wheat. A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population, obtained by crossing two bread wheat cultivars (‘Victo’ and ‘Spada’), was evaluated for resistance to the two pathogens at seedling stage. Upon developing a genetic map of 8726 SNP loci, linkage analysis identified three resistance Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs), with ‘Victo’ contributing the resistant alleles to all loci. One major QTL (QPm.gb-7A) was detected in response to Blumeria graminis on chromosome 7A, which explained 90% of phenotypic variation (PV). The co-positional relationship with known powdery mildew (Pm) resistance loci suggested that a new source of resistance was identified in T. aestivum. Two QTLs were detected in response to Puccinia triticina: a major gene on chromosome 5D (QLr.gb-5D), explaining a total PV of about 59%, and a minor QTL on chromosome 2B (QLr.gb-2B). A positional relationship was observed between the QLr.gb-5D with the known Lr1 gene, but polymorphisms were found between the cloned Lr1 and the corresponding ‘Victo’ allele, suggesting that QLr.gb-5D could represent a new functional Lr1 allele. Lastly, upon anchoring the QTL on the T. aestivum reference genome, candidate genes were hypothesized on the basis of gene annotation and in silico gene expression analysis.

1. Introduction

Powdery mildew and leaf rust, caused by Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici and Puccinia triticina, respectively, are important and widespread wheat (Triticum. aestivum L.) fungal diseases. They can cause up to 40% yield loss in susceptible cultivars by decreasing kernel number and kernel weight [1,2]. Chemical control is extensively used to maintain high yields when susceptible cultivars are grown. Instead, the deployment of genetically resistant cultivars obtained by breeding is considered as a cost-effective and environmentally safe disease control strategy.
Race-specific and race non-specific types of genetic resistance towards pathogens are generally found in plants. The former is qualitative, usually mediated by a single major gene (R), which is active upon recognition of pathogen’s effectors in a gene-for-gene relationship. Race-specific resistance is highly valuable in breeding because it confers near immunity towards specific pathogen races [3]. However, due to the rapid evolution of pathogen populations, major R genes are known to break down readily resulting in a limited lifespan of resistance [4]. Major R genes commonly encode for immune receptors from the Nucleotide-binding Leucine-Rich Repeats (NLR) type, with a few prominent exceptions including Stb6, a wheat resistance gene against Zymoseptoria tritici identified as a wall-associated receptor kinase-like protein [5]. Gene combinations, strategic gene deployment, and multiline cultivars are suggested strategies to expand the lifespan of race-specific resistance genes in the field [6]. Race-non-specific resistance is generally quantitative, controlled by several genes with major and minor effects, and typically active at the adult stage. While breeding of wheat cultivars with partial resistance is considered a sustainable strategy to control diseases [7], wheat breeding programs typically combine both major R genes and partial resistance in an attempt to achieve high levels of durable resistance.
Approaches commonly used to discover loci associated with complex traits in plants are linkage and association mapping [8]. Although association mapping is a relatively recent approach and found effective to locate genomic loci associated with complex traits in plants [9], linkage mapping has been extensively and successfully used to map and clone genes associated with various traits in plants.
To date, 54 powdery mildew (Pm) and 72 leaf rust (Lr) resistance genes have been identified and mapped in wheat and its relatives. Most of them are race specific, and only 4 Pm and 12 Lr confer broader resistance to their respective diseases [10,11]. Additionally, four identified Pm genes (Pm38, Pm39, Pm46, and Pm48) confer a pleiotropic effect on other disease responses, including leaf rust, stripe rust, and stem rust (Yr18/Lr34/Pm38/Sr57, Yr29/Lr46/Pm39/Sr58, Yr30/Lr27/Pm48/Sr2, and Yr46/Lr67/Pm46/Sr55) [12,13,14,15,16]. Thus, such genes are highly valuable for breeding multiple disease resistance in wheat.
Of these mapped genes, only sixteen conferring resistance to powdery mildew (Pm3 allelic series, Pm8, Pm17, Pm41, Pm24, Pm21, Pm2, Pm60, Pm1a, and Pm5e) and leaf rust (Lr1, Lr10, Lr21, Lr22a, Lr34, and Lr67) have been cloned so far in wheat [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], and the majority were identified using the linkage mapping approach.
Most of these gene are race-specific and encode typical NLR-type proteins including Lr1, Lr21, Lr10, Pm3b, Pm2, Pm60, and Pm21 in wheat. Others, such as Lr34 and Lr67, are race-non-specific and encode an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter or a hexose transporter, respectively.
The current study aims to expand the current knowledge on bread wheat resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust through the identification of novel resistance loci by means of artificial inoculation at the seedling stage of a Recombinant Inbred Line (RIL) population derived from a cross between the cultivars (cvs) ‘Victo’ (resistant) and ‘Spada’ (susceptible). The objectives of this work were (i) to develop a high-density genetic map, (ii) to conduct a QTL mapping of the genetic basis of powdery mildew and leaf rust resistances, and (iii) to propose a list of candidate genes that could be involved in the resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Evaluations of Leaf Rust and Powdery Mildew Resistance

Evaluation of the leaf rust and powdery mildew responses provided a clear discrimination between the two parents. For both isolates of Puccinia triticina (Pt_Jerez05 and Pt_VMC03) ‘Victo’ showed a high level of resistance (Infection Type, IT,0), while ‘Spada’ was clearly susceptible (IT9). Regarding the powdery mildew response, three different isolates (Bgt_96224, Bgt_94202, and Bgt_JIW2) were tested on the parental lines. The bread wheat cultivar ‘Victo’ was resistant toward Bgt_JIW2 and Bgt_96224, showing a resistance level ranging from IT3 to IT4, while ‘Spada’ was susceptible with values higher than IT7 (Table 1). The 128 RILs were subjected to artificial inoculation with leaf rust (isolate Pt_VMC03) and powdery mildew (isolate Bgt_JIW2) isolates: IT values for each pathogen and disease severity only for Pt_VMC03 were recorded.
The frequency distribution of phenotypic reactions for RILs is shown in Figure 1. Transgressive segregation was observed for the two disease severity assessments. Lines more resistant than ‘Victo’ (IT higher than 8) were identified toward powdery mildew, and lines more susceptible than ‘Spada’ were retrieved in response to Blumeria graminis and Puccinia triticina using IT and Relative Disease Severity (RDS) values, respectively. A significant correlation was observed only between RDS and IT values detected for leaf rust response (r = 0.99; p < 0.0001).
Disease symptoms, as indicated by the IT values, were used to classify the RILs into two classes for both diseases. For leaf rust reaction, the first class contained resistant RILs showing IT values between 0 and 6, while the susceptible class included lines with IT values from 7 to 9. The classes for powdery mildew instead are composed by resistant lines that showed an IT value ranging from 0 to 5, while the susceptible lines had IT values from 6 to 9. Analysis of the obtained frequency distribution of the phenotypic reactions (Figure 1) indicated a significantly higher number of RILs in the resistant class than in the susceptible one for leaf rust, while a similar number of lines fell into the two major phenotypic classes when considering the powdery mildew data. The observed segregation ratio (p < 0.05; Table 2) of susceptible and resistant lines revealed that the resistance associated to powdery mildew could be under control of a major genetic factor, while more loci could be involved in the leaf rust response.
Variation for the phenotypic data for each disease was assessed by ANOVA, considering the effects of genotypes and replications. Highly significant genotypic effect was detected for both diseases and confirmed by the calculated broad sense heritability (Table S1). The estimates of broad sense heritability for powdery mildew and leaf rust resistances were 0.92 and 0.97, respectively, indicating that most of the phenotypic variance was due to genetic effects.

2.2. Construction of the Victo x Spada Genetic Linkage Map

Out of 67,799 high-quality SNP markers, 9828 SNPs were polymorphic between the parental lines. After elimination of unlinked loci, the genotype data relating to 8726 informative SNPs were assembled into 30 linkage groups corresponding to the 21 bread wheat chromosomes (Table 3).
More than one linkage group was obtained for chromosomes 2D, 3A, 4A, 4D, 6D, 7A, 7B, and 7D. The overall length of the map was 3291.5 cM with individual chromosome genetic length ranging from 31.8 cM (chromosome 4D) to 323.2 cM (chromosome 5A) and an average of 156.74 cM. The total number of mapped loci per chromosome ranged from 16 (chromosome 4D) to 801 (chromosome 1B) with an average of 415.52 loci per chromosome. Details about the genetic distances between markers are provided in Table S2. The genome-wide mean inter-locus separation was 0.38 cM, varying from 0.23 cM (chromosomes 1A, 1B, 6D) to 1.99 cM (chromosome 4D) (Table 3). Considering the homeologous groups, group 1 showed both the highest number of mapped loci (1651) and the highest marker density (mean of 0.27 cM/marker), while group 5 had the longest map length (660.4 cM) (Table 3). Differences were also observed between the three subgenomes (A, B, and D). The subgenomes A and B showed similar values in map length and marker density, while subgenome D was less polymorphic compared with the other two, as already described previously in bread wheat linkage maps developed using the 90k array [35,36,37,38].

2.3. Identification of QPm.gb-7A, a Powdery Mildew Resistance QTL on Chromosome 7AL

The analysis of powdery mildew resistance allowed the identification of one associated region on the long arm of chromosome 7A (named as QPm.gb-7A; Table 4).
This QTL, with a confidence interval of 1.4 cM, explained 90% of phenotypic variation, and the resistant parent ‘Victo’ contributed the allele with the positive effect. Furthermore, on the basis of the physical position of associated markers on the Chinese Spring (CS) reference genome, we defined that the QTL region extends for 6.35 Mbp, from 724,084,703 to 730,433,215 bp (Table 5).
To date, a number of powdery mildew resistance genes have been identified on chromosome 7AL (Table S3). To compare the QPm.gb-7A region identified in this work, with known regions controlling resistance to powdery mildew, a physical map was developed using all markers associated to powdery mildew resistance loci retrieved from the genetic map regions previously identified. The molecular markers were then ordered on the basis of their physical position through BLAST search on the CS reference genome.
QPm.gb-7A spanned a region of approximately 6.35 Mbp, between marker IWA6833 at position 724.0 Mbp and marker IWA5904 at position 730.4 Mbp (Figure 2).
In the surrounding of QPm.gb-7A, nineteen powdery mildew resistant loci have been reported.
i.
Five loci were located upstream QPm.gb-7A: PmNCA6 (from 583.9 to 611.8 Mbp), PmTb7A.1 (from 583.9 to 688.6 Mbp), Pm37 (from 681.3 to 684.1 Mbp), PmNAG11 (from 681.3 to 713.8 Mbp), and PmNCA4 (from 590.2 to 713.8 Mbp) [39,40,41,42].
ii.
Two loci have an overlapping region with QPm.gb-7A from 2.73 to 3.01 Mbp: mlAG12 (from 717.0 to 726.8 Mbp) and mlRD30 (from 727.4 to 734.0 Mbp) [43,44].
iii.
QPm.gb-7A was included completely in the physical regions, from 12.37 Mbp to 15.22 Mbp, identified by PmU (from 717.0 to 732.3 Mbp), mlW18 (from 724.1 to 736.5 Mbp), and mlUM15 (from 717.0 to 732.3 Mbp) [45,46,47].
iv.
Nine additional resistance loci showed a co-positional relationship of physical region with QPm.gb-7A: Pm59 (from 724.0 to 724.1Mbp), mlIW172 (from 724.1 to 727.4 Mbp), Pm1, mlIW72, mlm80, PmTb7A.2 and mlm2033.(from 724.1 to 726.8), HSM1 (from 724.1 to 727.4 Mbp), and PmG16 (from 727.4 to 728.3 Mbp) [40,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55].
Overall, these data indicate that the long arm of chromosome 7A is particularly rich in powdery mildew resistance genes that come from different Triticum species. Only three of them, mlRD30 [44], Pm59 [48], and Pm1 [49,50], were detected in hexaploid wheat, while the other resistance loci are derived from tetraploids T. dicoccoides (mlIW72, mlIW172, mlW18, HSM1, and PmG16), A. neglecta (mlUM15), T. timopheevi (mlAG12), and from diploids T. boeticum (PmTb7A.2 and mlm80), T. urartu (PmU), and T. monococcum (mlm2033) [40,43,45,46,47,51,52,53,54,55].
The Pm1aSTS1 functional assay, recently developed to detect the T. aestivum lines carrying the Pm1a gene [33], was used to verify the presence of the gene in the ‘Victo’ genetic background. As shown in Figure 3 no amplification was obtained from ‘Victo’ genomic DNA; therefore, we can conclude that the powdery mildew-resistant gene identified in ‘Victo’ is not conferred by Pm1a.
Allelism analyses would be required to verify whether Pm59, mlRD30, and QPm.gb-7A represent different resistance genes or alleles; if this difference will be proved, QPm.gb-7A would represent a new source of powdery mildew resistance in T. aestivum.
Currently, only one powdery mildew resistance QTL, QPm.umb-7AL, was mapped to the long arm of chromosome 7A [56]. Information available for QPm.umb-7AL did not allow the identification of a precise physical location. The QPm.umb-7AL proximal marker (gwm428) did not allow identification of a BLAST match on chromosome 7A. The QPm.umb-7AL distal marker (cfa2040) was physically mapped on chromosome 7A at 717,078,361 bp. On the basis of these results, the QPm.umb-7AL was positioned at about 7 Mbp from QPm.gb-7A, suggesting that QPm.gb-7A was different from the region previously identified by Lillemo et al. [56].

2.4. Identification of QLr.gb-5D, a with Leaf Rust Resistance QTL on Chromosome 5DL

Two QTLs with major effects towards both phenotypic trait (IT and RDS) recorded for leaf rust were mapped to chromosome 5D. Since the map positions of the two QTLs were coincident, even considering that the possibility of linked genes cannot be ruled out, this locus with major effects on leaf rust resistance was designed as a single QTL named QLr.gb-5D. This region, whose effective allele was contributed by the resistant parent ‘Victo’, explained approximately 59% of phenotypic variance, considering both IT and RDS, while the confidence interval of 2.15 cM delineates a physical region of 2.498 Mbp (from 560,228,250 to 562,726,656 bp; Table 4 and Table 5).
Two additional significant regions towards IT and RDS of isolate VMC03 were localized on chromosome 2BL (Table 4). Additionally, in this case, the map position of the two QTLs was coincident and therefore considered as a single QTL (QLr.gb-2B). QLr.gb-2B showed significant values of variance explained (about 16%), and here as well ‘Victo’ contributed the resistance allele. Finally, 6% of the variance was explained by the interactions between the two detected QTLs (Table 4).
Currently, eight Lr genes (Lr57, Lr76, Lr70, Lr78, LrAc, Lr1, LrSyn137, and LrLB88) have been mapped on chromosome 5D. Of these, Lr1 [17], LrSyn137 [57], and LrLB88 [58] were located on the long arm of chromosome 5D.
Relationships among QLr.gb-5D and the other leaf rust genes previously mapped in the surrounding region were analyzed to highlight possible positional relationships (Figure 4).
No common markers were available when the map position of previously mapped Lr genes and the one of QLr.gb-5D were compared. Therefore, analogously to the procedure used for QPm.gb-7A, the physical positions of markers co-segregating/more associated to the Lr genes were retrieved through BLAST search on the CS reference genome.
LrLB88 markers were localized proximally to QLr.gb-5D, with the gene and the co-segregating functional marker WR003 (552.9 Mbp) being positioned at approximately 7.3 Mbp from QLr.gb-5D.
LrSyn137 was mapped in distal position to the LrLB88 functional marker WR003 (552.9 Mbp) as well with respect to gwm272 (562,333,785 bp) [57]. Information available for LrSyn137 does not allow the identification of a precise physical location for this locus but suggests that its position is distal with respect to QLr.gb-5D.
Overall, these comparisons are supporting a QLr.gb-5D physical position different from LrSyn137 and LrLB88.
For the analysis of co-positional relationships with Lr1, the cloned sequence [17] was used to identify its physical region on the CS reference genome. This analysis revealed that the Lr1 region in CS spans the sequence between position 561,894,974 to 561,900,201 bp on chromosome 5D. Considering that the QLr.gb-5D physical interval extends from position 560,228,250 to 562,726,656 bp, the observed relationship raised the possibility that QLr.gb-5D represents the ‘Victo’ allele of the Lr1 gene (Figure 4).
To analyze homology relationships between the Lr1 alleles, the Lr1 gene was amplified (primer pairs in Table S4) and sequenced in the parental lines ‘Victo’ and ‘Spada’. The putative Lr1 ‘Victo’ allele was then used to perform BLAST searches on the 12 genes annotated as disease resistance proteins in the CS physical interval underlying QLr.gb-5D (TraesCS5D01G559100, TraesCS5D01G559200, TraesCS5D01G560500, TraesCS5D01G561100, TraesCS5D01G561200, TraesCS5D01G561300, TraesCS5D01G561400, TraesCS5D01G563400, TraesCS5D01G563500, TraesCS5D01G563600, TraesCS5D01G563700, and TraesCS5D01G564000). Similarly, the Lr1 from wheat cv ‘Glenlea’ (the source of the original resistant allele) [17] was used as a query to BLAST search the 12 CS sequences annotated as disease resistance proteins. The ‘Victo’ sequence showed no significant similarity to nine of these genes, while identity values ranging from 88.07% to 95.73% were found for TraesCS5D01G560500, TraesCS5D01G561300, and TraesCS5D01G561200, with the highest level of identity detected for TraesCS5D01G561200. The same results were obtained using the Lr1 from ‘Glenlea’ (Table S5, Supplementary File 1). On the basis of these results, TraesCS5D01G561200 could represent the CS allele of both the Lr1 from ‘Glenlea’ and the putative Lr1 from ‘Victo’.
The ‘Glenlea’ and ‘Victo’ sequences showed identity of 98.51% (E value 0.0). Fifty-one SNPs and 2 deletions were detected when the ‘Victo’ and ‘Glenlea’ sequences were aligned. Most of these polymorphisms (46 SNPs and 2 deletions) were restricted to a region of 443 bp, from position 4157 to position 4600 bp of the ‘Glenlea’ sequence (GeneBank Acc. N. ABS29034.1; Supplementary File 1).
Alignment of the corresponding protein sequences showed 30 differences between the ‘Victo’ (1339 amino acids) and the ‘Glenlea’ Lr1 alleles (1344 amino acids). When these polymorphisms were analyzed with respect to the position of protein domains and structural motifs of Lr1 (GenBank ABS29034.1), no polymorphisms were identified in the NB-ARC and P-loop_NTPase domains; rather, the variations were restricted to the LRR structural motifs. In more detail, 15 amino acids changes are present in 4 LRR motifs, and 9 of these (at positions 1025, 1136, 1159, 1160, 1184, 1186, 1216, 1218, and 1222 of ‘Glenlea’ amino acid sequence) determine modifications in the physicochemical properties of the protein (Figure 5; Figure S1).
These results may suggest that QLr.gb-5D represents a new functional Lr1 allele.

2.5. In Silico Functional Analysis of QPm.gb-7A Candidate Resistance Genes

Analysis of the CS bread wheat genomic sequence underlying the QPm.gb-7A locus led to the identification of 80 annotated genes: of these, 12 were encoded functions compatible with a possible role in resistance to powdery mildew.
A total of nine sequences were annotated as disease resistance protein (TraesCS7A01G551900, TraesCS7A01G553600, TraesCS7A01G553700, TraesCS7A01G554200, TraesCS7A01G554400, TraesCS7A01G555200, TraesCS7A01G555300, TraesCS7A01G555400, and TraesCS7A01G557700), two as receptor-like protein kinase (TraesCS7A01G550000 and TraesCS7A01G550100), while TraesCS7A01G550200 encoded for a hexosyltransferase that could have a role in resistance as demonstrated for Lr67 in barley and wheat [22,59].
The in silico ExpVIP platform was used to retrieve the transcriptional profile of the 12 candidate genes listed above in response to biotic stresses in leaves and shoots. No expression was noticed for TraesCS7A01G553700, TraesCS7A01G55440, TraesCS7A01G555200, and TraesCS7A01G555300 (Figure 6; Table S6).
Seven genes (TraesCS7A01G551900, TraesCS7A01G550200, TraesCS7A01G555400, TraesCS7A01G550000, TraesCS7A01G553600, TraesCS7A01G557700, and TraesCS7A01G550100) were constitutively expressed. Three of them (TraesCS7A01G550200, TraesCS7A01G553600, and TraesCS7A01G550000) were found expressed only at seedling stage, while the remaining seem to be active regardless of developmental stages. The last remaining candidate gene (TraesCS7A01G554200) was reported as specifically expressed in response to pathogens in leaves and shoots at all developmental stages considered.
BLAST search against the CS genome of the Pm1a cloned sequence (GenBank accession ERZ1467246) identified TraesCS7A01G553600 as the Pm1a allele in CS. Considering the result of the absence of Pm1aSTS1 amplification (Figure 3), this region/gene, spanning for 2554 bp (from 726.46 Mbp to 726.47 Mbp; coverage 93%, Evalue = 0, and percentage of identity = 76%) can however be excluded from the list of putative candidate genes provided for the QPm.gb-7A locus.
When the in silico ExpVIP analysis was limited to powdery mildew RNA seq data, an increased expression during a late inoculation phase was observed for TraesCS7A01G550100, TraesCS7A01G554200, TraesCS7A01G557700, and TraesCS7A01G551900.
Expression analysis of cloned powdery mildew resistance genes from literature data indicate that all of them are responsive to pathogen infection. Cross-evidence about the most common expression pattern of cloned Pm genes with those of the candidates identified in the QPm.gb-7A physical interval in CS suggests that the role of candidates for the powdery mildew resistance governed by ‘Victo’ could be assigned to TraesCS7A01G550100, TraesCS7A01G554200 TraesCS7A01G557700, and TraesCS7A01G551900.

2.6. In Silico Functional Analysis of QLr.gb-5D Candidate Resistance Genes

The QLr.gb-5D interval includes 56 annotated genes, and 13 of them encode protein functions compatible with a possible role in resistance to leaf rust. In more detail, 11 genes (TraesCS5D01G559100, TraesCS5D01G559200, TraesCS5D01G560500, TraesCS5D01G561100, TraesCS5D01G561200, TraesCS5D01G561300, TraesCS5D01G561400, TraesCS5D01G563400, TraesCS5D01G563500, TraesCS5D01G563600, and TraesCS5D01G563700) were annotated as disease resistance-related, while TraesCS5D01G563300 and TraesCS5D01G564000 were annotated as receptor-like protein and Pleiotropic drug resistance ABC transporter, respectively. Among them, TraesCS5D01G561200 (currently TraesCS5D02G561200) corresponds to the putative Lr1 allele of CS, as discussed above.
Expression data were available only for five candidate genes (TraesCS5D01G561200, TraesCS5D01G564000, TraesCS5D01G563600, TraesCS5D01G559100, and TraesCS5D01G563500). Their transcription profiles in leaves and shoots revealed that two of them (TraesCS5D01G561200 and TraesCS5D01G564000) are expressed at different developing stages irrespective of pathogen presence, while TraesCS5D01G563600, TraesCS5D01G559100, and TraesCS5D01G563500 were induced by pathogen infection at different time points only at seedling stage. For the above-mentioned genes, generally, an increased expression level was related to both early and late infection time points (Figure 6; Table S7).
Although, to our knowledge, there are no data on the transcriptional response of the cloned Lr genes to leaf rust infection that could be used to further discriminate the candidates. The five genes in the region (TraesCS5D01G559100, TraesCS5D01G561200 TraesCS5D01G563500, TraesCS5D01G564000, and TraesCS5D01G563600) were identified as responsive to diverse pathogen infections. TraesCS5D01G564000 was responsive to all pathogens considered, and three candidate genes (TraesCS5D01G563600, TraesCS5D01G559100, and TraesCS5D01G563500) were responsive only to powdery mildew infection. Finally, TraesCS5D01G561200 showed a clear induction only upon rust infection, further substantiating it is a potent, transcriptional active Lr1 allele.

3. Discussion

In the present study, a new high-density wheat genetic map based on the Victo × Spada RIL population was combined with disease scores from two major wheat pathogens, which allowed the identification of three loci controlling wheat resistance to powdery mildew and leaf rust at seedling stage. Linkage analysis identified one QTL (QPm.gb-7A) located on chromosome 7A for powdery mildew resistance and two QTLs (QLr.gb-2B and QLr.gb-5D) on chromosomes 2B and 5D for leaf rust resistance.

3.1. A New Genetic Map for Triticum Aestivum

A new high-density genetic linkage map containing 8726 loci was developed in bread wheat using a RIL mapping population derived from the bread wheat cvs ‘Victo’ and ’Spada’. The number of polymorphic SNP markers (9828) between the parental lines is comparable to those detected using the same SNP platform in the RIL populations described by Gao et al. and Zhai et al., with 7514 and 11,646 polymorphic SNPs, respectively [36,60]. Both the order of the markers and the genetic length (3291.5 cM) of the Victo × Spada map are in agreement with those of previously reported maps in hexaploid wheat made with the iSelect 90k array. The number of markers on each genome was uneven since markers for the A (43.14%) and B (50.32%) genomes were more abundant than those for the D genome (6.54%). Consistently with previous studies [35,36,37,38], this finding can be attributed to the low level of polymorphism in the D genome of hexaploid wheat. The D genome is a recent evolutionary addition to the hexaploid wheat genome, and there has been limited gene flow between A. tauschii and T. aestivum, possibly explaining the low level of polymorphism [61]. Although the average density is high, more than one linkage group was obtained for some chromosomes (2D, 3A, 4A, 4D, 6D, 7A, 7B, and 7D). The presence of large gaps and chromosome regions with low marker density has been described in several bread wheat maps developed using the iSelect 90K array [35,36,37,38,62,63] and could be explained by a lack of polymorphic markers, limited sequence variation, or extended identity by descent between the parents of the mapping population.

3.2. Identification of Powdery Mildew Resistance QTL in Hexaploid Wheat

The QPm.gb-7A resistance locus identified in the present work spans approximately 6.35 Mbp between marker IWA6833 and marker IWA5904 on chromosome 7AL and resides in a genomic region enriched in powdery mildew resistance genes. The physical interval retrieved for QPm.gb-7A compared with those of previously mapped powdery mildew resistance genes allowed the identification of positional overlapping between QPm.gb-7A and Pm59, Pm1, mlm80, mlIW72, mlIW172, HSM1, PmG16, PmTb7A.2, and mlm2033 [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. The tight linkage of these genes would suggest that they are likely members of a resistance gene cluster. Clustering of resistance genes is commonly observed in plant genomes and has been described in cloned resistance gene loci [64]. To our knowledge, what clearly differentiated QPm.gb-7A from Pm59, Pm1, mlIW72, mlIW172, HSM1, PmG16, mlm80, PmTb7A.2, and mlm2033 is the origin of these genes. Indeed mlIW72, mlIW172, HSM1, and PmG16 were identified in T. dicoccoides, mlm80 and PmTb7A.2 in T. boeticum, and mlm2033 in T. monococcum. The only three known regions previously identified in T. aestivum are represented by Pm1, Pm59, and mlRD30 that were detected in the Canadian wheat cv Axminster, in the Afghan wheat landrace PI 181356, and in the breeding line RD30, respectively [48,49,50]. Absence in ‘Victo’ of the Pm1aSTS marker diagnostic for the Pm1 in the bread wheat line [33] allowed to conclude that QPm.gb-7A is different from Pm1.
Clearly, the telomeric region of chromosome 7A appears to be rich in powdery mildew resistance genes. Allelism analysis would clarify the relationships among these genes. QPm.gb-7A explained the effective powdery mildew resistance harbored by ‘Victo’ and represents a useful source of disease resistance for powdery mildew resistance breeding in hexaploid wheat, supported by the SNP markers here identified as tightly associated to the resistance locus. Search for candidate genes in the QPm.gb-7A physical region in CS identified 12 genes encoding proteins with possible disease resistance function against powdery mildew. Consistent with previous transcriptional studies of cloned Pm genes, two candidates, TraesCS7A01G550100 and TraesCS7A01G554200, are activated in response to powdery mildew infection. The results here obtained set a solid basis for further molecular isolation of the mildew resistance gene underlying the QPm.gb-7A.

3.3. Identification of Leaf Rust QTLs in Hexaploid Wheat

In this work, a major QTL controlling leaf rust resistance (QLr.gb-5D) derived from the bread wheat cv ‘Victo’ was mapped on the long arm of chromosome 5D. This resistance locus explains nearly 60% of the phenotypic variation for leaf rust resistance conferred by the resistant parent, as evaluated using the IT and RDS scores. This locus represents a useful source of leaf rust resistance in hexaploid wheat, supported by closely associated SNP markers identified in this work.
Literature data indicate that three leaf rust resistance genes are located on the long arm of chromosome 5D: Lr1, shown to be present in many wheat cvs [10,11] and A. tauschii accessions e.g., [65], LrSyn137 from A. tauschii [57], and LrRB88 from common wheat [58]. Two molecular markers RGA567 and WR003 have been proposed as functional markers to identify the Lr1 gene. Qi et al. [58] described the leaf rust resistance gene LrLB88 on chromosome 5DL as co-segregating with Lr1 (WR003 marker) but also showed a reaction pattern to 13 Chinese rust pathotypes that was clearly distinct with respect to Lr1 [58]. Mohler et al. [57], using the functional Lr1 marker RGA567 that mapped proximal to LrSyn137, provided evidence indicating that LrSyn137 and Lr1 are different rust resistance genes [57].
Co-positional relationships on the CS genome sequence were identified for QLr.gb-5D and the position of the Lr1 leaf rust resistance gene. Sequencing of the Lr1 allele from ‘Victo’ highlighted strong sequence identity (98.51%) with the Lr1 gene cloned from the wheat cv ‘Glenlea’.
The polymorphisms identified were concentrated within a region of 443 bp lying in the LRR domain of the encoded NLR protein. Moreover, alignment of the amino acid sequences showed perfect identity until position 1025, after which differences in 26 amino acids were found in the LRR region (from aa 1025 to aa 1222 of the ‘Glenlea’ sequence; Figure 5; Figure S1). None of these amino acid changes is predicted to make the ‘Victo’ Lr1 protein unfunctional or truncated.
Analysis of the CS annotated sequences in the QLr.gb-5D region identified 13 genes encoding proteins with possible roles in resistance to leaf rust. Among these, TraesCS5D01G561200 showed the highest level of sequence identity with Lr1 and with the ‘Victo’ allele of Lr1. In silico analysis of the expression of this gene using the ExpVIP platform indicated that TraesCS5D01G561200 is responsive to pathogen infection.
Taken together, these results may raise the possibility that QLr.gb-5D represents a new Lr1 allele in the bread wheat cv ‘Victo’. Such a hypothesis could be tested in the future using functional mutagenesis assays in ‘Victo’, or by means of the transgenic line expressing the Lr1 ‘Victo’ allele.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Genetic Materials

Two bread wheat cultivars, ‘Victo’ (pedigree: NK-79-W-810/W-0010-E//W-1051-A) and ‘Spada’ (pedigree: TREBBO/KANSAS//(TR.TG) PSEUDOCERVINUM), were crossed, and 128 F7–8 RILs were developed by single-seed descent. For DNA extraction, one leaf of each line was ground using the Retsch MM300 Mixer Mill instrument (Newtown, PA, USA), then the Wizard Magnetic 96 DNA Plant System (Promega Italia, Milano, Italy) kit was used for DNA extraction and purification following the manufacturer’s instructions. All the germplasm was developed and maintained by CREA-Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics in Fiorenzuola d’Arda (Piacenza, Italy).

4.2. Phenotypic Evaluation

Evaluations for the powdery mildew responses were performed using three different Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) isolates, two from Switzerland (Bgt_96224 and Bgt_94202) and one from UK (Bgt_JIW2) [66]. These isolates, with differential virulence specificities for many known powdery mildew resistance genes, were first used to evaluate the response of the parental lines. Results of this preliminary screen indicated that two of these isolates (Bgt_96224 and Bgt_JIW2) provided a suitable level of discrimination of the resistant vs. susceptible responses between the parents. One of these two isolates, Bgt_JIW2, was then used to screen the RIL population. Regarding P. triticina (Pt), two isolates, Pt_Jerez05 and Pt_VMC03, were tested: both showed a clear discrimination in the resistant/susceptible response of the parents, with ‘Victo’ being resistant, while ‘Spada’ was susceptible at the first, fourth, and fifth leaf stages. The isolate Pt_VMC03 was selected to analyze the RIL population. Pt_VMC03 is a monosporic isolate derived from a rust population collected at Villamanrique de la Condesa, Sevilla, Spain, in 2003 [67]. For both pathogens, the criterion for choosing the isolates to be used to screen the RILs was based on maximizing the responses at the level of ‘Victo’ and ‘Spada’.
Powdery mildew and leaf rust reactions were evaluated in controlled conditions at seedling stage. The seedling resistance assays for powdery mildew [68] were evaluated using a detached leaf segment method, and six independent replicates were used for each RIL line. The leaf rust experiment consisted of 3 pots (replicates) per RIL and 5 plants per pot, using the procedure reported in Desiderio et al. [67].
The 128 RILs and their parents were evaluated, and the infection type (IT) for each pathogen and disease severity (DS) for leaf rust were recorded. IT was score with visual evaluation of the sporulation intensity and expressed in a scale from 0 (fully resistant) to 9 (fully susceptible). Reactions to leaf rust and powdery mildew (IT) were scored 14 and 10 days after inoculation, respectively [67,68]. DS was visually estimated as the percentage of leaf area covered by rust. To calculate a balanced average, the original disease scores were converted into relative disease severity (RDS) values, by setting the disease value of the susceptible parent ‘Spada’ equal to 100.

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Frequency distributions of the phenotypic data were tested for normal distribution to estimate the complexity of genetic control of the traits. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of disease traits was performed to test the significance of differences between RILs and replications using JMP v. 7 software [69] (SAS Institute, Milano, Italy). The effects of replications and genotypes were accounted in the model. The values of variance obtained from the ANOVA were used to calculate broad sense heritability according to Nyquist and Barker [70]. Correlations between traits were estimated using the Spearman coefficient.

4.4. Linkage Analysis

Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) molecular markers were used to analyze the parental lines and the RILs. Genotyping was performed at the Trait Genetics Laboratory (Gatersleben, Germany) with the Infinium iSelect 90K wheat SNP BeadChip array (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) carrying 81,587 functional markers [62]. SNP markers with ambiguous SNP calling between parents and/or with a negative hybridization response in most lines were removed from the data set; after this check, 67,799 high-quality SNP markers were retained.
Linkage analysis was performed using the CARTHAGENE software [71] with a LOD score threshold of 9.0, maximum distance of 20 cM, and the Kosambi mapping function to calculate map distances [72]. The obtained linkage groups were assigned to chromosomes by comparing markers of the generated maps to previously published high-density bread wheat maps [35,36,37,38,62,63]. Within each linkage group, the best order of markers and the genetic distances were found using different CARTHAGENE’s functions: build, greedy, flips, and polish. All mapped markers were tested for the expected 1:1 segregation ratio using a chi-square (χ2) goodness-of-fit test.

4.5. QTL Analysis

QTL mapping was conducted with the R/qtl package of the R statistical computing software [73]. For each trait, an initial QTL scan was performed using simple interval mapping with a 1 cM step [74], and the position of the highest LOD was recorded. A genome-wide significance level of 5% was calculated after 1000 permutations [75], and LOD threshold greater than or equal to 3.2 was used to declare a QTL. Then, the position and the effect of the QTL were determined using the multiple imputation method by executing the “sim.geno” command, followed by the “fitqtl” command [76]. To search additional QTLs, the “addqtl” command was used. If a second QTL was detected, the “fitqtl” was used to test a model containing both QTLs and then the interaction effect. If both QTLs remained significant, the “refineqtl” command was used to re-estimate the QTLs’ positions based on the full model including both loci. QTLs interactions were studied, and the significant locus combinations are reported based on F-measure. The additive effects of QTLs were estimated as half of the difference between the phenotypic values of the respective homozygotes. The confidence interval (CI) of each QTL was determined as proposed by Darvasi and Soller [77].

4.6. Analysis of Physical Regions Carrying QTLs Related to Disease

The major QTLs identified in the present study were projected on the T. aestivum reference genome sequence (cv ‘Chinese Spring’; CS) to define their physical confidence interval [78]. Peak markers and flanking markers corresponding to the confidence intervals (CIs) were located on the reference genome using BLAST search matches of the corresponding SNP flanking sequences. This information was then used to compare the QTLs identified in this work with known genes/QTLs, previously identified in wheat [10,11]. For this purpose, the physical interval of known genes was defined using marker information as a query to perform the BLAST searches against the CS reference genome.
The physical regions underlying the QTLs were inspected to identify candidate genes based on their functional annotation. Moreover, if functional markers were available for known genes, they were tested on the parental lines.
Finally, the ExpVIP platform (Wheat Expression Browser, www.wheat-expression.com) was employed to analyze the transcriptional profile of the candidate genes underlying the identified QTLs, and we assessed their activation in response to biotic stresses using RNA sequencing data available on the platform. In detail, we considered for the analysis leaves and shoots as tissues and seedling and vegetative developing stages. Transcript abundances are expressed in log2 (transcript per million, tpm) [79]. In this work, only the experimental designs addressing responses to pathogens were considered.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/6/3109/s1, Figure S1: Alignment of amino acid sequences of Lr1 from ‘Glenlea’ and ‘Victo’, Table S1: Analysis of variance, Table S2: Victo × Spada linkage map, Table S3: Origins of powdery mildew resistance genes previously mapped to the long arm of chromosome 7A, Table S4: Primer pairs developed to amplify the Lr1 gene, Table S5: BLAST results obtained using the ‘Victo’ and the cloned Lr1 sequences (GeneBank Acc. N. ABS29034.1) as a query towards the Chinese Spring reference genome, Table S6: Transcriptional profile of candidate genes selected for powdery mildew in response to biotic stresses in leaves and shoots retrieve from the ExpVIP platform, Table S7: Transcriptional profile of candidate genes selected for leaf rust in response to biotic stresses in leaves and shoots retrieve from the ExpVIP platform, Supplementary File 1: Nucleotide sequence alignments.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, F.D., S.B. and D.R.; Funding acquisition, D.R., B.K., L.C. and G.V.; Investigation, F.D., S.B. and D.R.; Resources, D.R., B.K., L.C. and G.V.; Supervision, D.R., E.M., B.K., L.C. and G.V.; Writing—Original draft, F.D.; Writing—Review & editing, F.D., S.B., D.R., B.K., E.M., L.C. and G.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR) through PRIMA2019 project CerealMed “Enhancing diversity in Mediterranean cereal farming systems and the project SOSTENIBILITA’ DELLA FILIERA AGROALIMENTARE” (SO.FI.A), in the frame of National Technological Cluster of Ministry of University and Research (MIUR, Italy).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

https://zenodo.org/search?page=1&size=20&q=4534102 (accessed on 11 February 2021).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Linda Lüthi (University of Zurich) for technical help with mildew phenotyping.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, M.H.; Bukhari, A.; Dar, Z.A.; Rizvi, S.M. Status and strategies in breeding for rust resistance in wheat. Agric. Sci. 2013, 4, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Conner, R.L.; Kuzyk, A.D.; Su, H. Impact of powdery mildew on the yield of soft white spring wheat cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2003, 83, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bourras, S.; McNally, K.E.; Müller, M.C.; Wicker, T.; Keller, B. Avirulence genes in cereal powdery mildews: The gene-for-gene hypothesis 2.0. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. McDonald, B.A.; Linde, C. The population genetics of plant pathogens and breeding strategies for durable resistance. Euphytica 2002, 124, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Keller, B.; Krattinger, S.G. A new player in race-specific resistance. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 197–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mundt, C.C. Pyramiding for resistance durability: Theory and practice. Phytopathology 2018, 108, 792–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Li, Z.; Lan, C.; He, Z.; Singh, R.P.; Rosewarne, G.M.; Chen, X.; Xia, X. Overview and application of QTL for adult plant resistance to leaf rust and powdery mildew in wheat. Crop. Sci. 2014, 54, 1907–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Purcell, S.; Cherny, S.S.; Sham, P.C. Genetic Power Calculator: Design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 149–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, C.; Gore, M.; Buckler, E.S.; Yu, J. Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome 2008, 1, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McIntosh, R.A.; Dubcovsky, J.; Rogers, J.W.; Morris, C.; Appels, R.; Xia, C.X. Catalogue of gene Symbols for Wheat: 2013–2014 Supplement. KOMUGI Integr. Wheat Sci. 2013. Available online: http://www.shigen.nig.ac.jp/wheat/komugi/genes/symbolClassList.jsp (accessed on 22 December 2020).
  11. McIntosh, R.; Dubcovsky, J.; Rogers, W.; Morris, C.; Xia, X. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. 2017. Supplement. Annu. Wheat Newsl. 2017, 53, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lillemo, M.; Asalf, B.; Singh, R.P.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Chen, X.M.; He, Z.H.; Bjørnstad, Å. The adult plant rust resistance loci Lr34/Yr18 and Lr46/Yr29 are important determinants of partial resistance to powdery mildew in bread wheat line Saar. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116, 1155–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lagudah, E.S.; Krattinger, S.G.; Herrera-Foessel, S.; Singh, R.P.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Spielmeyer, W.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Selter, L.L.; Keller, B. Gene-specific markers for the wheat gene Lr34/Yr18/Pm38 which confers resistance to multiple fungal pathogens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 889–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Hare, R.; McIntosh, R. Genetic and cytogenetic studies of durable adult-plant resistance in ‘Hope’ and related cultivars to wheat rust. Plant Breed. 1979, 83, 356–367. [Google Scholar]
  15. Singh, R.P.; Nelson, J.C.; Sorrells, M.E. Mapping Yr28 and other genes for resistance to stripe rust in wheat. Crop. Sci. 2000, 40, 1148–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Herrera-Foessel, S.A.; Singh, R.P.; Lillemo, M.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Bhavani, S.; Singh, S.; Lan, C.; Calvo-Salazar, V.; Lagudah, E.S. Lr67/Yr46 confers adult plant resistance to stem rust and powdery mildew in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cloutier, S.; McCallum, B.D.; Loutre, C.; Banks, T.W.; Wicker, T.; Feuillet, C.; Keller, B.; Jordan, M.C. Leaf rust resistance gene Lr1, isolated from bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a member of the large psr567 gene family. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 93–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Feuillet, C.; Travella, S.; Stein, N.; Albar, L.; Nublat, A.; Keller, B. Map-based isolation of the leaf rust disease resistance gene Lr10 from the hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 15253–15258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, L.; A Brooks, S.; Li, W.; Fellers, J.P.; Trick, H.N.; Gill, B.S. Map-based cloning of leaf rust resistance gene Lr21 from the large and polyploid genome of bread wheat. Genetics 2003, 164, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Thind, A.K.; Wicker, T.; Šimková, H.; Fossati, D.; Moullet, O.; Brabant, C.; Vrána, J.; Doležel, J.; Krattinger, S.G. Rapid cloning of genes in hexaploid wheat using cultivar-specific long-range chromosome assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017, 35, 793–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krattinger, S.G.; Lagudah, E.S.; Spielmeyer, W.; Singh, R.P.; Huerta-Espino, J.; McFadden, H.; Bossolini, E.; Selter, L.L.; Keller, B. A putative ABC transporter confers durable resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in wheat. Science 2009, 323, 1360–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Milne, R.J.; Dibley, K.E.; Schnippenkoetter, W.H.; Mascher, M.; Lui, A.C.; Wang, L.; Lo, C.; Ashton, A.R.; Ryan, P.R.; Lagudah, E.S. The wheat Lr67 gene from the sugar transport protein 13 family confers multipathogen resistance in Barley. Plant Physiol. 2018, 179, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Yahiaoui, N.; Srichumpa, P.; Dudler, R.; Keller, B. Genome analysis at different ploidy levels allows cloning of the powdery mildew resistance genePm3bfrom hexaploid wheat. Plant J. 2004, 37, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhullar, N.K.; Street, K.; Mackay, M.; Yahiaoui, N.; Keller, B. Unlocking wheat genetic resources for the molecular identification of previously undescribed functional alleles at the Pm3 resistance locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9519–9524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hurni, S.; Brunner, S.; Buchmann, G.; Herren, G.; Jordan, T.; Krukowski, P.; Wicker, T.; Yahiaoui, N.; Mago, R.; Keller, B. RyePm8and wheatPm3are orthologous genes and show evolutionary conservation of resistance function against powdery mildew. Plant J. 2013, 76, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Singh, S.P.; Hurni, S.; Ruinelli, M.; Brunner, S.; Sanchez-Martin, J.; Krukowski, P.; Peditto, D.; Buchmann, G.; Zbinden, H.; Keller, B. Evolutionary divergence of the rye Pm17 and Pm8 resistance genes reveals ancient diversity. Plant Mol. Biol. 2018, 98, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, M.; Dong, L.; Li, B.; Wang, Z.; Xie, J.; Qiu, D.; Li, Y.; Shi, W.; Yang, L.; Wu, Q.; et al. A CNL protein in wild emmer wheat confers powdery mildew resistance. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1027–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lu, P.; Guo, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, B.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Qiu, D.; Shi, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, N.; et al. A rare gain of function mutation in a wheat tandem kinase confers resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Xing, L.; Hu, P.; Liu, J.; Witek, K.; Zhou, S.; Xu, J.; Zhou, W.; Gao, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, R.; et al. Pm21 from haynaldia villosa encodes a CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring powdery mildew resistance in wheat. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 874–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. He, H.; Zhu, S.; Zhao, R.; Jiang, Z.; Ji, Y.; Ji, J.; Qiu, D.; Li, H.; Bie, T. Pm21, encoding a typical CC-NBS-LRR protein, confers broad-spectrum resistance to wheat powdery mildew disease. Mol. Plant 2018, 11, 879–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Sánchez-Martín, J.; Steuernagel, B.; Ghosh, S.; Herren, G.; Hurni, S.; Adamski, N.; Vrána, J.; Kubaláková, M.; Krattinger, S.G.; Wicker, T.; et al. Rapid gene isolation in barley and wheat by mutant chromosome sequencing. Genome Biol. 2016, 17, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zou, S.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Kong, Z.; Tang, D. The NB-LRR gene Pm60 confers powdery mildew resistance in wheat. New Phytol. 2017, 218, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hewitt, T.; Mueller, M.C.; Molnár, I.; Mascher, M.; Holušová, K.; Šimková, H.; Kunz, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Bhatt, D.; et al. A highly differentiated region of wheat chromosome 7AL encodes a Pm1a immune receptor that recognizes its corresponding AvrPm1a effector from Blumeria graminis. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 2812–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Xie, J.; Guo, G.; Wang, Y.; Hu, T.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Qiu, D.; Li, Y.; Wu, Q.; Lu, P.; et al. A rare single nucleotide variant in Pm5e confers powdery mildew resistance in common wheat. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 1011–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, Y.; Wang, R.; Hu, Y.-G.; Chen, J. Genome-wide linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci for late-season physiological and agronomic traits in spring wheat under irrigated conditions. Agronomy 2018, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gao, F.; Wen, W.; Liu, J.; Rasheed, A.; Yin, G.; Xia, X.; Wu, X.; He, Z. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for yield components, plant height and yield-related physiological traits in the chinese wheat cross zhou 8425B/Chinese spring. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Su, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, N.; Song, L.; Liu, L.; Xue, X.; Liu, G.; Liu, J.; Meng, D.; et al. QTL detection for kernel size and weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SNP and SSR-based linkage map. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, F.; Wen, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, S.; He, Z.; Rasheed, A.; Jin, H.; Zhang, C.; Yan, J.; et al. Genetic architecture of grain yield in bread wheat based on genome-wide association studies. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Miranda, L.M.; Perugini, L.; Srnic, G.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Marshall, D.; Leath, S.; Murphy, J.P. Genetic mapping of a triticum monococcum -derived powdery mildew resistance gene in common wheat. Crop. Sci. 2007, 47, 2323–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chhuneja, P.; Kumar, K.; Stirnweis, D.; Hurni, S.; Keller, B.; Dhaliwal, H.S.; Singh, K. Identification and mapping of two powdery mildew resistance genes in Triticum boeoticum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 124, 1051–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Perugini, L.D.; Murphy, J.P.; Marshall, D.; Brown-Guedira, G. Pm37, a new broadly effective powdery mildew resistance gene from Triticum timopheevii. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 116, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Srnic, G.; Murphy, J.P.; Lyerly, J.H.; Leath, S.; Marshall, D.S. Inheritance and chromosomal assignment of powdery mildew resistance genes in two winter wheat germplasm lines. Crop. Sci. 2005, 45, 1578–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Maxwell, J.J.; Lyerly, J.H.; Cowger, C.; Marshall, D.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Murphy, J.P. MlAG12: A Triticum timopheevii-derived powdery mildew resistance gene in common wheat on chromosome 7AL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 119, 1489–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Singrün, C.; Hsam, S.L.K.; Zeller, F.J.; Wenzel, G.; Mohler, V. Localization of a novel recessive powdery mildew resistance gene from common wheat line RD30 in the terminal region of chromosome 7AL. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qiu, Y.C.; Zhou, R.H.; Kong, X.Y.; Zhang, S.S.; Jia, J.Z. Microsatellite mapping of a Triticum urartu Tum. derived powdery mildew resistance gene transferred to common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 1524–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Han, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, G.; Zhang, H.; Xie, C.; Yang, Z.; Sun, Q.; Liu, Z. Molecular mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene MlWE18 in wheat originated from wild emmer (Triticum turgidum var. dicoccoides). Acta Agronomica Sinica 2009, 35, 1791–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Worthington, M.; Lyerly, J.; Petersen, S.; Brown-Guedira, G.; Marshall, D.; Cowger, C.; Parks, R.; Murphy, J.P. MlUM15: An Aegilops neglecta -derived powdery mildew resistance gene in common wheat. Crop. Sci. 2014, 54, 1397–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tan, C.; Li, G.; Cowger, C.; Carver, B.F.; Xu, X. Characterization of Pm59, a novel powdery mildew resistance gene in Afghanistan wheat landrace PI 181356. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018, 131, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Ma, Z.Q.; Sorrells, M.E.; Tanksley, S.D. RFLP markers linked to powdery mildew resistance genes Pm1, Pm2, Pm3, and Pm4 in wheat. Genome 1994, 37, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Neu, C.; Stein, N.; Keller, B. Genetic mapping of the Lr20–Pm1 resistance locus reveals suppressed recombination on chromosome arm 7AL in hexaploid wheat. Genome 2002, 45, 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Yao, G.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Xu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Sorrells, M.E. Genetic mapping of two powdery mildew resistance genes in einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.) accessions. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 114, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ji, X.; Xie, C.; Ni, Z.; Yang, T.; Nevo, E.; Fahima, T.; Liu, Z.; Sun, Q. Identification and genetic mapping of a powdery mildew resistance gene in wild emmer (Triticum dicoccoides) accession IW72 from Israel. Euphytica 2007, 159, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ouyang, S.; Zhang, N.; Han, J.; Zhao, X.; Cui, Y.; Song, W.; Huo, N.; Liang, Y.; Xie, J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Fine physical and genetic mapping of powdery mildew resistance gene MlIW172 originating from wild emmer (Triticum dicoccoides). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Li, N.; Wen, Z.; Wang, J.; Fu, B.; Liu, J.; Xu, H.; Kong, Z.; Zhang, L.; Jia, H.; Ma, Z. Transfer and mapping of a gene conferring later-growth-stage powdery mildew resistance in a tetraploid wheat accession. Mol. Breed. 2013, 33, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ben-David, R.; Xie, W.; Peleg, Z.; Saranga, Y.; Dinoor, A.; Fahima, T. Identification and mapping of PmG16, a powdery mildew resistance gene derived from wild emmer wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lillemo, M.; Bjørnstad, Å.; Skinnes, H. Molecular mapping of partial resistance to powdery mildew in winter wheat cultivar Folke. Euphytica 2012, 185, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohler, V.; Schmolke, M.; Zeller, F.J.; Hsam, S.L.K. Genetic analysis of Aegilops tauschii-derived seedling resistance to leaf rust in synthetic hexaploid wheat. J. Appl. Genet. 2020, 61, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Qi, A.; Li, X.; Shi, L.; Liu, D.; Li, Z. Identification of a leaf rust resistance gene in the Chinese wheat line LB0288. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 2016, 51, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Moore, J.W.; Herrera-Foessel, S.; Lan, C.; Schnippenkoetter, W.; Ayliffe, M.; Huerta-Espino, J.; Lillemo, M.; Viccars, L.; Milne, R.J.; Periyannan, S.; et al. A recently evolved hexose transporter variant confers resistance to multiple pathogens in wheat. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1494–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhai, H.; Feng, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Xiao, S.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q. QTL analysis of spike morphological traits and plant height in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SNP and SSR-based linkage map. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dubcovsky, J.; Dvorak, J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 2007, 316, 1862–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, S.; Wong, D.; Forrest, K.; Allen, A.; Chao, S.; Huang, B.E.; Maccaferri, M.; Salvi, S.; Milner, S.G.; Cattivelli, L.; et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 787–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Maccaferri, M.; Zhang, J.; Bulli, P.; Abate, Z.; Chao, S.; Cantu, D.; Bossolini, E.; Chen, X.; Pumphrey, M.; Dubcovsky, J. A genome-wide association study of resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in a worldwide collection of hexaploid spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2015, 5, 449–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Borrelli, G.M.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Marone, D.; Crosatti, C.; Michelotti, V.; Valè, G.; Mastrangelo, A.M. Regulation and evolution of NLR genes: A close interconnection for plant immunity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ling, H.-Q.; Qiu, J.; Singh, R.P.; Keller, B. Identification and genetic characterization of an Aegilops tauschii ortholog of the wheat leaf rust disease resistance gene Lr1. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 109, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Bourras, S.; McNally, K.E.; Ben-David, R.; Parlange, F.; Roffler, S.; Praz, C.R.; Oberhaensli, S.; Menardo, F.; Stirnweis, D.; Frenkel, Z.; et al. Multiple avirulence loci and allele-specific effector recognition control the Pm3 race-specific resistance of wheat to powdery mildew. Plant Cell 2015, 27, 2991–3012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Desiderio, F.; Guerra, D.; Rubiales, D.; Piarulli, L.; Pasquini, M.; Mastrangelo, A.M.; Simeone, R.; Blanco, A.; Cattivelli, L.; Valè, G. Identification and mapping of quantitative trait loci for leaf rust resistance derived from a tetraploid wheat Triticum dicoccum accession. Mol. Breed. 2014, 34, 1659–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Brunner, S.; Hurni, S.; Streckeisen, P.; Mayr, G.; Albrecht, M.; Yahiaoui, N.; Keller, B. Intragenic allele pyramiding combines different specificities of wheat Pm3 resistance alleles. Plant J. 2010, 64, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jones, B.; Sall, J. JMP statistical discovery software. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2011, 3, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nyquist, W.E.; Baker, R.J. Estimation of heritability and prediction of selection response in plant populations. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1991, 10, 235–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. De Givry, S.; Bouchez, M.; Milan, D.; Schiex, T.; Chabrier, P. CARHTA GENE: Multipopulation integrated genetic and radiation hybrid mapping. Bioinformatics 2004, 21, 1703–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kosambi, D.D. The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann. Eugen. 1943, 12, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Broman, K.W.; Wu, H.; Sen, Ś.; Churchill, G.A. R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 889–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Lander, E.S.; Botstein, D. Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics 1989, 121, 185–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Churchill, G.A.; Doerge, R.W. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 1994, 138, 963–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sen, Ś.; Churchill, G.A. A statistical framework for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 2001, 159, 371–387. [Google Scholar]
  77. Darvasi, A.; Soller, M. A simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of QTL map location. Behav. Genet. 1997, 27, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. The International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium (IWGSC); Appels, R.; Eversole, K.; Stein, N.; Feuillet, C.; Keller, B.; Rogers, J.; Pozniak, C.J.; Choulet, F.; Distelfeld, A.; et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science 2018, 361, eaar7191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Borrill, P.; Ramirez-Gonzalez, R.; Uauy, C. expVIP: A customizable RNA-seq data analysis and visualization platform. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 2172–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 22 03109 g001 550
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of phenotypic reaction to leaf rust (black) and powdery mildew (grey) isolates expressed as infection type (A) or relative disease severity (B). The frequency distribution using the major two classes of infection type were reported (C) as resistant (R) and susceptible (S). Reaction scores of the parents are indicated by arrows. The y-axis shows the number of lines.
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of phenotypic reaction to leaf rust (black) and powdery mildew (grey) isolates expressed as infection type (A) or relative disease severity (B). The frequency distribution using the major two classes of infection type were reported (C) as resistant (R) and susceptible (S). Reaction scores of the parents are indicated by arrows. The y-axis shows the number of lines.
Ijms 22 03109 g001
Ijms 22 03109 g002 550
Figure 2. Physical map of QPm.gb-7A and other regions harboring significant effects for powdery mildew resistance. The physical position, expressed in kilobases, and the flanking molecular markers of each QTL are reported.
Figure 2. Physical map of QPm.gb-7A and other regions harboring significant effects for powdery mildew resistance. The physical position, expressed in kilobases, and the flanking molecular markers of each QTL are reported.
Ijms 22 03109 g002
Ijms 22 03109 g003 550
Figure 3. Marker Pm1aSTS1 assay showing specificity to Pm1a-containing T. aestivum lines. Victo, Spada, and Chinese Spring (CS) do not have the Pm1a gene, while Axminster (A) and Axminster/8*Chancellord (A/8*C) do have it.
Figure 3. Marker Pm1aSTS1 assay showing specificity to Pm1a-containing T. aestivum lines. Victo, Spada, and Chinese Spring (CS) do not have the Pm1a gene, while Axminster (A) and Axminster/8*Chancellord (A/8*C) do have it.
Ijms 22 03109 g003
Ijms 22 03109 g004 550
Figure 4. Relationships of QLr.gb-5D with leaf rust resistance genes (Lr1, LrLB88 and LrSyn137) previously mapped on chromosome 5DL. The physical position of molecular markers retrieved from the CS reference genome are reported.
Figure 4. Relationships of QLr.gb-5D with leaf rust resistance genes (Lr1, LrLB88 and LrSyn137) previously mapped on chromosome 5DL. The physical position of molecular markers retrieved from the CS reference genome are reported.
Ijms 22 03109 g004
Ijms 22 03109 g005 550
Figure 5. Polymorphisms between the Lr1 (GenBank ABS29034.1) and the ‘Victo’ protein sequences are reported from 1025 to 1222 of the ‘Glenlea’ amino acid sequence. The vertical number gives the amino acid positions in the Lr1 protein. Deletions are shown as dashes. The polymorphic sites detected in the leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) domain are indicated. In red are highlighted the amino acids that determine modifications in terms of physicochemical properties.
Figure 5. Polymorphisms between the Lr1 (GenBank ABS29034.1) and the ‘Victo’ protein sequences are reported from 1025 to 1222 of the ‘Glenlea’ amino acid sequence. The vertical number gives the amino acid positions in the Lr1 protein. Deletions are shown as dashes. The polymorphic sites detected in the leucine-rich-repeat (LRR) domain are indicated. In red are highlighted the amino acids that determine modifications in terms of physicochemical properties.
Ijms 22 03109 g005
Ijms 22 03109 g006 550
Figure 6. In silico expression analysis of selected candidate genes for powdery mildew (a) and leaf rust (b) resistance in response to biotic stresses in leaves and shoots. Seedling (S) and vegetative (V) developing stages are considered. Different time points, expressed as hour post inoculation (hpi) and days post inoculation (dpi), are indicated. Different diseases are considered: stripe rust (Yr), powdery mildew (Pm), crown rot (Cr), and septoria tritici blotch (Stb). The control condition is indicated as mock. Transcript abundances are expressed in log2 (tpm). Only genes whose expression profiles were available are reported. Data from Wheat Expression Browser (www.wheat-expression.com; accessed on 7 January 2021).
Figure 6. In silico expression analysis of selected candidate genes for powdery mildew (a) and leaf rust (b) resistance in response to biotic stresses in leaves and shoots. Seedling (S) and vegetative (V) developing stages are considered. Different time points, expressed as hour post inoculation (hpi) and days post inoculation (dpi), are indicated. Different diseases are considered: stripe rust (Yr), powdery mildew (Pm), crown rot (Cr), and septoria tritici blotch (Stb). The control condition is indicated as mock. Transcript abundances are expressed in log2 (tpm). Only genes whose expression profiles were available are reported. Data from Wheat Expression Browser (www.wheat-expression.com; accessed on 7 January 2021).
Ijms 22 03109 g006
Table
Table 1. Parental lines reaction responses (expressed as infection type) to different isolates of Puccinia triticina (Pt) and B. graminis (Bgt) tested.
Table 1. Parental lines reaction responses (expressed as infection type) to different isolates of Puccinia triticina (Pt) and B. graminis (Bgt) tested.
Pt_Jerez05Pt_VMC03Bgt_96224Bgt_94202Bgt_JIW2
Victo004.383.1
Spada997.898
Table
Table 2. The observed segregation ratio among resistant (R) and susceptible (S) lines.
Table 2. The observed segregation ratio among resistant (R) and susceptible (S) lines.
Trait/DiseaseR:SRatiop1
IT Leaf Rust83:381:14.6 × 10−5
IT Powdery Mildew59:611:10.797894
1p value < 0.05 indicating that the observed segregation ratio is significantly different from the expected segregation ratio at 95% level of confidence.
Table
Table 3. Distribution of molecular markers in the chromosomes and homeologous groups of the Victo × Spada bread wheat map. Information on Kosambi centiMorgan (cM) length of the maps across the bread wheat chromosomes, and chromosome-based mean inter-locus separation (cM/marker) is also provided.
Table 3. Distribution of molecular markers in the chromosomes and homeologous groups of the Victo × Spada bread wheat map. Information on Kosambi centiMorgan (cM) length of the maps across the bread wheat chromosomes, and chromosome-based mean inter-locus separation (cM/marker) is also provided.
Chromosome_
Linkage Group		Total
Marker		Total Marker
(No Co-Segregant)		cMcM/Marker 1cM/Marker 2
1A_1704102159.20.231.56
1B_1801115186.10.231.62
1D_114644100.30.692.28
2A_1422631670.402.65
2B_1841113199.30.241.76
2D_12189.70.461.21
2D_2401985.82.154.52
2D_all612795.51.573.54
3A_138379167.60.442.12
3A_2681438.40.562.74
3A_all451932060.462.22
3B_1708116228.70.321.97
3D_134619.10.563.18
4A_117160161.50.942.69
4A_2841615.70.190.98
4A_all25576177.20.692.33
4B_130562150.70.492.43
4D_17612.41.772.07
4D_2669.31.551.55
4D_33310.13.373.37
4D_all161531.81.992.12
5A_1578146323.20.562.21
5B_17741392330.301.68
5D_19518104.21.105.79
6A_164475157.70.242.10
6B_144878197.10.442.53
6D_122722.51.023.21
6D_21361414.20.101.01
6D_all1582136.70.231.75
7A_16111151980.321.72
7A_29915200.201.33
7A_all7101302180.311.68
7B_142384131.30.311.56
7B_2911549.30.543.29
7B_all51499180.60.351.82
7D_113512.20.942.44
7D_24825107.92.254.32
7D_all6130120.11.974.00
Total872615683291.50.382.11
Genome
A37646851408.30.372.06
B43917221375.50.311.91
D571161507.70.893.15
Group
11651261445.60.271.71
21324203461.80.352.27
31193215453.80.382.11
4576153359.70.622.35
51447303660.40.462.18
61250174391.50.312.25
71285259518.70.402.00
1 Calculated considering all the markers. 2 Calculated considering only the no co-segregating markers.
Table
Table 4. QTLs and their interactions detected in the Victo × Spada segregating population for powdery mildew and leaf rust resistance. Chromosomes (Chr), peak marker, LOD scores, percentages of phenotypic variance explained (R2), estimated additive effects, and the confidence interval (CI) were also provided.
Table 4. QTLs and their interactions detected in the Victo × Spada segregating population for powdery mildew and leaf rust resistance. Chromosomes (Chr), peak marker, LOD scores, percentages of phenotypic variance explained (R2), estimated additive effects, and the confidence interval (CI) were also provided.
QTLTrait Disease ChrPeak MarkercMLODR2 (%)Additive Effect 1CI
QPm.gb-7AIT powdery mildew7AIWB5507114.86090−3.814.1–15.5
QLr.gb-2BIT leaf rust2BIWB32376113.910.515.2−1.16109–118.1
QLr.gb-5DIT leaf rust5DIWB11400104.228.159.3−2.43103.1–105.3
QLr.gb-2B*QLr.gb-5DIT leaf rust 4.746.110.93
QLr.gb-2BRDS leaf rust2BIWB32376113.911.216.2−14.153109.9–117.8
QLr.gb-5DRDS leaf rust5DIWB11400104.228.459.3−28.599103.1–105.3
QLr.gb-2B*QLr.gb-5DRDS leaf rust 5.16.5111.335
1 The negative value indicates that the allele of the gene from ‘Victo’ positively contributed to the resistance or reduced the severity of disease.
Table
Table 5. Genetic and physical intervals identified for the major QTLs identified for powdery mildew and leaf rust resistance.
Table 5. Genetic and physical intervals identified for the major QTLs identified for powdery mildew and leaf rust resistance.
QTLChrGenetic Interval (cM)Start (cM)End (cM)MbpStart (bp)End (bp)
QPm.gb-7A7A1.4114.115.56.35724,084,703730,433,215
QLr.gb-5D5D2.15103.1105.32.49560,228,250562,726,656
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Desiderio, F.; Bourras, S.; Mazzucotelli, E.; Rubiales, D.; Keller, B.; Cattivelli, L.; Valè, G. Characterization of the Resistance to Powdery Mildew and Leaf Rust Carried by the Bread Wheat Cultivar Victo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063109

AMA Style

Desiderio F, Bourras S, Mazzucotelli E, Rubiales D, Keller B, Cattivelli L, Valè G. Characterization of the Resistance to Powdery Mildew and Leaf Rust Carried by the Bread Wheat Cultivar Victo. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22(6):3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063109

Chicago/Turabian Style

Desiderio, Francesca, Salim Bourras, Elisabetta Mazzucotelli, Diego Rubiales, Beat Keller, Luigi Cattivelli, and Giampiero Valè. 2021. "Characterization of the Resistance to Powdery Mildew and Leaf Rust Carried by the Bread Wheat Cultivar Victo" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, no. 6: 3109. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22063109

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop