Search Results (3)

Background/Objectives: Ocular proprioception is implicated in balance control and heterophoria is associated with abnormal posture, though previous research focused mainly on the role of vertical phoria and the use of vertical prisms. This study aims to evaluate whether ocular misalignment and prismatic correction of horizontal phoria affect posture. Methods: Sixty-nine (N = 69) young healthy subjects were included and equally divided by horizontal distance phoria: orthophoria (n = 23), esophoria (n = 23) and exophoria (n = 23). A prism of low power (two-diopter) was placed base out on the non-dominant eye, reducing misalignment in esophorics and increasing it in exophorics more than in orthophorics. Dynamic computerized posturography was performed with the sensory organization test protocol (SOT) of the EquiTest^® NeuroCom^® version 8 platform both without and with prism, always maintaining subjects unaware of prism use. A mixed model for repeated measures analysis of variance was run to evaluate the main effect of prism and the interaction effect of prism with baseline phoria. Results: Composite movement strategy score without prism was 88.1 ± 2.8% (ankle-dominant strategy) and slightly increased to 89.0 ± 3.1% with prism insertion (p = 0.004), further shifting toward ankle strategy. Composite equilibrium score without prism was 80.3 ± 6.5% and remained stable with prism insertion (81.3 ± 8.2%, p = 0.117), medio-lateral and antero-posterior projection of center of gravity did not displace significantly under prism insertion (p = 0.652 and p = 0.270, respectively). At baseline, posturographic parameters were statistically independent of individual phoria, and no significant interaction between prism insertion and individual phoria was documented for any parameters (p > 0.05 for all). Secondary analysis and pairwise comparisons confirmed that the effect of prism was strongly selective on condition SOT 5 (eyes-closed, platform sway-referenced) with improvement of equilibrium (70.4 ± 9.7% with prism vs. 65.7 ± 11.6% without) and more use of ankle strategy (81.6 ± 5.3% with prism vs. 78.2 ± 6.0% without), without any interaction of phoria and ocular dominance, while the other conditions were comparable with and without prism. Conclusions: A two-diopter prism base out on the non-dominant eye induces the body to use the ankle joint more independently of individual phoria, suggesting a small improvement in postural control, while maintaining oscillations of the center of gravity unaltered. Prism seems to enhance the function of vestibular system selectively. Phoria adjustments with prismatic correction enable intervention in postural behavior. Extraocular muscles could act as proprioceptors influencing postural stability. Full article

Identifying a vestibular source of pathology in patients complaining of post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) dizziness can be difficult. We describe a possible new method utilizing a reduction in post-TBI symptoms (including dizziness) with the use of a noise cancellation device (NCD). This retrospective case series included patients with TBI and dizziness presenting to a binocular vision specialty clinic, who were diagnosed with a vertical heterophoria (VH). If they did not respond adequately to microprism lenses and/or if they experienced hyperacusis, they were evaluated with an NCD. If there was marked reduction in TBI symptoms (including dizziness), the patients were referred to a neuro-otologist for vestibular diagnostic evaluation and treatment. Fourteen patients were identified and found to have abnormalities on vestibular testing consistent with third mobile window disorder (TMWD). All were treated with a 6-week medical protocol (diuretics, no straining, low sodium/no caffeine diet). Five responded positively, requiring no further treatment. Nine required surgical intervention and responded positively. In conclusion, in 14 patients with post-concussive dizziness and VH, a positive response to NCD was associated with abnormal vestibular testing, a diagnosis of TMWD, and symptom reduction/resolution with a medical or surgical approach. The removal of sound resulting in reduction or resolution of vestibular symptoms represents an inverse Tullio phenomenon. Full article

Background: To objectively measure with an eye tracker both eye movement conjugacy and gaze direction in different positions when performing the Hess Lancaster Screen Test (HLST) in a sample of control subjects without binocular dysfunction and compare the results with those of the traditional subjective HLST performance. Methods: The sample was selected avoiding subjects who suffered from suppression of one of the two eyes, visual acuity less than 20/25 on the Snellen chart in each eye, strabismus, or any symptom of binocular dysfunction that could alter the results. While performing the HLST, the examiner wrote down each of the points on a template in a traditional way while the eye tracker (Tobii Pro Fusion, Tobii AB, Danderyd, Sweden), placed in front of the subject, took objective measurements of the position of both eyes at each point. Of the 29 subjects recruited in this study, 13 subjects between 18 and 27 years old underwent the complete optometric examination and the HLST wearing anaglyph glasses; meanwhile, 16 people were excluded because of binocular or accommodative dysfunctions or because they didn’t give reliable eye-tracking results. Additionally, a specific program called Etracker Parse Video (University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain) was developed to analyse the prismatic deviation between both eyes at each evaluated point. Results: Similar horizontal prismatic deviations of visual axes were obtained in the different gaze positions with the Maddox rod, the manually annotated HLST, and the eye-tracker measurement. Variations were found in the magnitude of the deviation between methods but not in the direction. On the other hand, vertical deviations were more difficult for the examiner to detect and quantify, especially those with small magnitudes; more exact values were obtained when measuring objectively with the eye tracker. Conclusion: The HLST is very useful and allows the amount of heterophoria or heterotropia to be recorded in the patient’s medical record in all the main gaze positions. This test is complementary; by itself, it is not diagnostic and does not replace a complete examination of binocular vision. The eye tracker is an objective method with which we can evaluate the HLST in patients with no binocular problems, obtaining more accurate results than when it is performed in the traditional manner. Full article