Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vertical expandable prosthesis titanium ribs

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 5551 KiB  
Article
Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: Traditional Growing Rod vs. Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod vs. Vertical Expandable Prosthesis Titanium Ribs
by Bruna Maccaferri, Francesco Vommaro, Chiara Cini, Giuseppe Filardo, Luca Boriani and Alessandro Gasbarrini
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 177; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010177 - 31 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1511
Abstract
Objectives: Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) can be addressed by different growth-friendly approaches, although the indications of each technique remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare, in a large series of patients, the potential and limitations of the different distraction-based surgical [...] Read more.
Objectives: Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) can be addressed by different growth-friendly approaches, although the indications of each technique remain controversial. The aim of this study was to compare, in a large series of patients, the potential and limitations of the different distraction-based surgical techniques to establish the most suitable surgical approach to treat EOS. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study evaluating 62 EOS cases treated between January 2002 and December 2021 with a traditional growing rod (TGR), a magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and vertical expandable prosthesis titanium ribs (VEPTR) at IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy. The patients included had a mean age of 7 years and a mean follow-up of 36 months. The COBB angle was measured on x-rays at preoperative, early postoperative, and end of follow-up, and complications were recorded. Results: in our cohort, VEPTR was mainly used in congenital scoliosis (50% vs. a mean value of 25.8%) and syndromic scoliosis (42.9% vs. a mean value of 25.8%). MCGR was mainly used in idiopathic scoliosis (73.9% vs. an average value of 41.9%). TGR was mostly used in muscular neurology EOS (16% vs. an average value of 6.5%). The collected data show a similar deformity correction rate in growing-rod implants in VEPTR, TGR, and MCGR. The mean curve reduction was 25.8 95% CI (21.8–29.8) (p < 0.0005). Compared with preoperative measurements, significant differences in curve magnitude correction between subgroups occurred at the final treatment measurements, when patients with MCGR had a significantly larger correction (53.2° ± 20.84 in %33.9 con DS ± 14.27) than VEPTR (27.12°± 19.13 in %19.7° ± 13.7). Conclusions: Different growing-rod techniques are applied based on EOS etiology. While all EOS etiologies benefited from this surgical approach, congenital EOS had poorer results. Overall, MCGR has been the preferred option for idiopathic EOS and appears to be the most effective in correcting the primary curve. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 893 KiB  
Article
Analytical Problems with Preparation of Paraspinal Tissues from Patients with Spinal Fusion for Analysis of Titanium
by Jan Sawicki, Anna Danielewicz, Magdalena Wójciak, Michał Latalski, Agnieszka Skalska-Kamińska, Katarzyna Tyszczuk-Rotko and Ireneusz Sowa
Molecules 2021, 26(8), 2120; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26082120 - 7 Apr 2021
Viewed by 1929
Abstract
Preparation of paraspinal tissue of patients with implants for elemental analysis is a challenge because it contains titanium in the ionic form, as well as metallic debris. Most literature reports focus on dissolving the tissue, but the impact of digestion conditions on metallic [...] Read more.
Preparation of paraspinal tissue of patients with implants for elemental analysis is a challenge because it contains titanium in the ionic form, as well as metallic debris. Most literature reports focus on dissolving the tissue, but the impact of digestion conditions on metallic debris of Ti has not been investigated. In our work, various digestion conditions, including systems, compositions of oxidising mixture, and time, were tested aiming (i) to digest the tissue without digestion of metallic titanium to quantify soluble Ti and (ii) to digest metallic titanium debris to asses total Ti content in tissue. The experiments were performed in a closed mode using a microwave-assisted system and a carbon heating block. Our study revealed that total digestion of titanium was impossible in the tested conditions and the maximal level of digested titanium was below 70%. The mineralisation with the use of concentrated nitric acid was optimal to prepare paraspinal samples to analyse the soluble titanium form because metallic titanium passivated and did not migrate to the solution. The elaborated conditions were applied to determine titanium ion in the periimplant tissue of patients with three different titanium-based surgical systems, including traditional growing rod (TGR), guided growth systems (GGS), and vertical expandable prosthesis titanium rib (VEPTR). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sample Preparation for Bioanalysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop