Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = variants in HMGB1 gene

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 17696 KiB  
Article
The Yeast HMGB Protein Hmo1 Is a Multifaceted Regulator of DNA Damage Tolerance
by Jinlong Huo, Anhui Wei, Na Guo, Ruotong Wang and Xin Bi
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073255 - 1 Apr 2025
Viewed by 638
Abstract
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomal architectural protein Hmo1 is categorized as an HMGB protein, as it contains two HMGB motifs that bind DNA in a structure-specific manner. However, Hmo1 has a basic C-terminal domain (CTD) that promotes DNA bending instead of an acidic one [...] Read more.
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomal architectural protein Hmo1 is categorized as an HMGB protein, as it contains two HMGB motifs that bind DNA in a structure-specific manner. However, Hmo1 has a basic C-terminal domain (CTD) that promotes DNA bending instead of an acidic one found in a canonical HMGB protein. Hmo1 has diverse functions in genome maintenance and gene regulation. It is implicated in DNA damage tolerance (DDT) that enables DNA replication to bypass lesions on the template. Hmo1 is believed to direct DNA lesions to the error-free template switching (TS) pathway of DDT and to aid in the formation of the key TS intermediate sister chromatid junction (SCJ), but the underlying mechanisms have yet to be resolved. In this work, we used genetic and molecular biology approaches to further investigate the role of Hmo1 in DDT. We found extensive functional interactions of Hmo1 with components of the genome integrity network in cellular response to the genotoxin methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), implicating Hmo1 in the execution or regulation of homology-directed DNA repair, replication-coupled chromatin assembly, and the DNA damage checkpoint. Notably, our data pointed to a role for Hmo1 in directing SCJ to the nuclease-mediated resolution pathway instead of the helicase/topoisomerase mediated dissolution pathway for processing/removal. They also suggested that Hmo1 modulates both the recycling of parental histones and the deposition of newly synthesized histones on nascent DNA at the replication fork to ensure proper chromatin formation. We found evidence that Hmo1 counteracts the function of histone H2A variant H2A.Z (Htz1 in yeast) in DDT possibly due to their opposing effects on DNA resection. We showed that Hmo1 promotes DNA negative supercoiling as a proxy of chromatin structure and MMS-induced DNA damage checkpoint signaling, which is independent of the CTD of Hmo1. Moreover, we obtained evidence indicating that whether the CTD of Hmo1 contributes to its function in DDT is dependent on the host’s genetic background. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that Hmo1 can contribute to, or regulate, multiple processes of DDT via different mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1350 KiB  
Article
Target Gene-Based Association Study of High Mobility Group Box Protein 1 in Intracranial Aneurysms in Koreans
by Eun Pyo Hong, Sung Woo Han, Bong Jun Kim, Dong Hyuk Youn, Jong Kook Rhim, Jin Pyeong Jeon and Jeong Jin Park
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(10), 969; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14100969 - 26 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1307
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the effect of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) on intracranial aneurysms (IAs) by analyzing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. HMGB1 mRNA and protein expression levels in plasma were also analyzed. Methods: This study [...] Read more.
Objective: We investigated the effect of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) on intracranial aneurysms (IAs) by analyzing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) data. HMGB1 mRNA and protein expression levels in plasma were also analyzed. Methods: This study was a comprehensive analysis of a GWAS dataset, including 250 patients with IAs and 294 controls. The HMGB1 gene region was targeted within SNP rs3742305 ± 10 kbp. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined its association with IAs after adjusting for relevant clinical factors. HMGB1 mRNA expression was analyzed in the plasma of 24 patients selected from the GWAS dataset. The HMGB1 protein was analyzed by Western blotting. Results: A total of seven polymorphisms, including rs1360485, rs185382445, rs2039338, rs1045411, rs3742305, rs2249825, and rs189034241, were observed. Two SNPs, including rs1045411 (UTR-3) and rs3742305 (intron), showed strong linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.99). However, none of the seven SNPs associated with IAs had an adjusted p-value of < 0.0016 on multiple comparison analysis. HMGB1 mRNA levels (2−ΔCt) did not differ significantly between patients with IAs and the control subjects [1.07 (1.00–1.15) in patients with IAs vs. 1.05 (0.94–1.12) in controls; p = 0.67)]. Also, no significant difference in the degree of plasma HMGB1 protein expression was seen between the two groups (p = 0.82). Conclusions: The number of SNPs associated with HMGB1 and the degree of HMGB1 mRNA and protein expression were not significantly different between patients diagnosed with IAs and the controls. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop