Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = variable-rate herbicide spraying

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 9797 KiB  
Article
Developing AI Smart Sprayer for Punch-Hole Herbicide Application in Plasticulture Production System
by Renato Herrig Furlanetto, Ana Claudia Buzanini, Arnold Walter Schumann and Nathan Shawn Boyd
AgriEngineering 2025, 7(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering7010002 - 24 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1374
Abstract
In plasticulture production systems, the conventional practice involves broadcasting pre-emergent herbicides over the entire surface of raised beds before laying plastic mulch. However, weed emergence predominantly occurs through the transplant punch-holes in the mulch, leaving most of the applied herbicide beneath the plastic, [...] Read more.
In plasticulture production systems, the conventional practice involves broadcasting pre-emergent herbicides over the entire surface of raised beds before laying plastic mulch. However, weed emergence predominantly occurs through the transplant punch-holes in the mulch, leaving most of the applied herbicide beneath the plastic, where weeds cannot grow. To address this issue, we developed and evaluated a precision spraying system designed to target herbicide application to the transplant punch-holes. A dataset of 3378 images was manually collected and annotated during a tomato experimental trial at the University of Florida. A YOLOv8x model with a p2 output layer was trained, converted to TensorRT® to improve the inference time, and deployed on a custom-built computer. A Python-based graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to facilitate user interaction and the control of the smart sprayer system. The sprayer utilized a global shutter camera to capture real-time video input for the YOLOv8x model, which activates or disactivates a TeeJet solenoid for precise herbicide application upon detecting a punch-hole. The model demonstrated excellent performance, achieving precision, recall, mean average precision (mAP), and F1score exceeding 0.90. Field tests showed that the smart sprayer reduced herbicide use by up to 69% compared to conventional broadcast methods. The system achieved an 86% punch-hole recognition rate, with a 14% miss rate due to challenges such as plant occlusion and variable lighting conditions, indicating that the dataset needs to be improved. Despite these limitations, the smart sprayer effectively minimized off-target herbicide application without causing crop damage. This precision approach reduces chemical inputs and minimizes the potential environmental impact, representing a significant advancement in sustainable plasticulture weed management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5101 KiB  
Article
Intelligent Rice Field Weed Control in Precision Agriculture: From Weed Recognition to Variable Rate Spraying
by Zhonghui Guo, Dongdong Cai, Juchi Bai, Tongyu Xu and Fenghua Yu
Agronomy 2024, 14(8), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081702 - 2 Aug 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3447
Abstract
A precision agriculture approach that uses drones for crop protection and variable rate application has become the main method of rice weed control, but it suffers from excessive spraying issues, which can pollute soil and water environments and harm ecosystems. This study proposes [...] Read more.
A precision agriculture approach that uses drones for crop protection and variable rate application has become the main method of rice weed control, but it suffers from excessive spraying issues, which can pollute soil and water environments and harm ecosystems. This study proposes a method to generate variable spray prescription maps based on the actual distribution of weeds in rice fields and utilize DJI plant protection UAVs to perform automatic variable spraying operations according to the prescription maps, achieving precise pesticide application. We first construct the YOLOv8n DT model by transferring the “knowledge features” learned by the larger YOLOv8l model with strong feature extraction capabilities to the smaller YOLOv8n model through knowledge distillation. We use this model to identify weeds in the field and generate an actual distribution map of rice field weeds based on the recognition results. The number of weeds in each experimental plot is counted, and the specific amount of pesticide for each plot is determined based on the amount of weeds and the spraying strategy proposed in this study. Variable spray prescription maps are then generated accordingly. DJI plant protection UAVs are used to perform automatic variable spraying operations based on prescription maps. Water-sensitive papers are used to collect droplets during the automatic variable operation process of UAVs, and the variable spraying effect is evaluated through droplet analysis. YOLOv8n-DT improved the accuracy of the model by 3.1% while keeping the model parameters constant, and the accuracy of identifying weeds in rice fields reached 0.82, which is close to the accuracy of the teacher network. Compared to the traditional extensive spraying method, the approach in this study saves approximately 15.28% of herbicides. This study demonstrates a complete workflow from UAV image acquisition to the evaluation of the variable spraying effect of plant protection UAVs. The method proposed in this research may provide an effective solution to balance the use of chemical herbicides and protect ecological safety. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Precision and Digital Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 3187 KiB  
Article
Droplet Deposition and Efficacy of Real-Time Variable-Rate Application of Herbicides at Reduced Dose in Winter Wheat Fields
by Jinwei Zhang, Xian Xu, Yuan Lv, Xueguan Zhao, Jian Song, Pingzhong Yu, Xiu Wang and Ercheng Zhao
Agronomy 2024, 14(1), 211; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010211 - 18 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1832
Abstract
Using an intelligent plant protection machine for spraying herbicides at a real-time variable rate plays a key role in improving the utilization efficiency of herbicides and reducing environmental pollution. Spraying volume (SV) and nozzle size (NS) are key factors influencing droplet deposition and [...] Read more.
Using an intelligent plant protection machine for spraying herbicides at a real-time variable rate plays a key role in improving the utilization efficiency of herbicides and reducing environmental pollution. Spraying volume (SV) and nozzle size (NS) are key factors influencing droplet deposition and herbicide efficacy and safety. A three-way split-split plot design experiment was conducted in the winter wheat field, with SV 180 L·ha−1 and 150 L·ha−1 in the main plot, a turbo air induction nozzle TTI11004 and TTI11003 in the subplot, herbicide flucarbazone-Na 70% WG mixed with florasulam 50 g·L−1 SC as the recommended dose, and a 20% reduced dose in the sub-subplot. Droplet deposition and weed control efficacy treated by these three factors and their combination were evaluated. Results indicated that there was a significant influence of SV on droplet coverage and density, but no significant influence of NS and its interaction with SV. A droplet coverage and density of treatment at 180 L·ha−1 were both significantly higher than at 150 L·ha−1. The influence of SV and its interaction with NS on weed control efficacy were significant. The efficacy of treatment TTI11004 at SV 180 L·ha−1 was the highest but decreased when NS was switched to TTI11003 and the SV was decreased to 150 L·ha−1. There was no significant effect of all the treatments on winter wheat yield and its components, but the yield loss could be reduced by 2.36% when the herbicide input was reduced by 20%. We can conclude that herbicide input can be reduced by at least 20% using the intelligent machine while equipped with the right NS at the right SV, which would increase the safety of winter wheat production. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4013 KiB  
Article
A Real-Time Weed Mapping and Precision Herbicide Spraying System for Row Crops
by Yanlei Xu, Zongmei Gao, Lav Khot, Xiaotian Meng and Qin Zhang
Sensors 2018, 18(12), 4245; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124245 - 3 Dec 2018
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 5388
Abstract
This study developed and field tested an automated weed mapping and variable-rate herbicide spraying (VRHS) system for row crops. Weed detection was performed through a machine vision sub-system that used a custom threshold segmentation method, an improved particle swarm optimum (IPSO) algorithm, capable [...] Read more.
This study developed and field tested an automated weed mapping and variable-rate herbicide spraying (VRHS) system for row crops. Weed detection was performed through a machine vision sub-system that used a custom threshold segmentation method, an improved particle swarm optimum (IPSO) algorithm, capable of segmenting the field images. The VRHS system also used a lateral histogram-based algorithm for fast extraction of weed maps. This was the basis for determining real-time herbicide application rates. The central processor of the VRHS system had high logic operation capacity, compared to the conventional controller-based systems. Custom developed monitoring system allowed real-time visualization of the spraying system functionalities. Integrated system performance was then evaluated through field experiments. The IPSO successfully segmented weeds within corn crop at seedling growth stage and reduced segmentation error rates to 0.1% from 7.1% of traditional particle swarm optimization algorithm. IPSO processing speed was 0.026 s/frame. The weed detection to chemical actuation response time of integrated system was 1.562 s. Overall, VRHS system met the real-time data processing and actuation requirements for its use in practical weed management applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop