Search Results (3)

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to test whether a parameter reflecting tumor dissemination (Dmax), derived from basal 18F-FDG PET/CT, may predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 78 patients (55 men, 23 women) with stage III and IV NSCLC who had undergone whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT scan at diagnosis were included in this study. Imaging parameters of primary lung tumors along with total MTV (MTV_TOT) and whole-body TLG (TLG_WB) of all malignant lesions were determined. Moreover, the largest distance between two 18F-FDG avid lesions (Dmax) in each patient was measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical and imaging variables were performed followed by overall survival (OS) curves. Results: A total of 441 lesions were analyzed, including 78 primary tumors, 174 metastatic lymph nodes, and 189 distant metastases. In primary tumors, the average values of SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, and TLG were 11.80 ± 5.73, 5.37 ± 2.09, 60.61 ± 102.57 mL, and 340.36 ± 558.40 g, respectively. The mean value of Dmax was 29.98 ± 20.98 cm, whereas the average values of MTV_TOT and TLG_WB were 155.90 ± 176.94 mL and 851.08 ± 1032.17 g, respectively. In the univariate analysis, OS was predicted by MTV_TOT (p = 0.0145), TLG_WB (p = 0.0518), Dmax (p = 0.0031), and stage (p = 0.0130), whereas in the multivariate analysis, only Dmax was retained in the model (χ² = 7.3130, p = 0.0068). In particular, a high Dmax value indicates a worse prognosis. Moreover, the combination of Dmax with MTV_TOT was able to improve the prognostic stratification of patients with advanced stages of NSCLC. Conclusions: Dmax, by reflecting tumor dissemination throughout the body, can predict overall survival in NSCLC patients. Full article

Objectives: Accurate outcome prediction is important for making informed clinical decisions in cancer treatment. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of using changes in radiomic features over time (Delta radiomics: absolute and relative) following chemotherapy, to predict relapse/progression and time to progression (TTP) of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) patients. Material and Methods: Given the lack of standard staging PET scans until 2011, only 31 out of 103 PMBCL patients in our retrospective study had both pre-treatment and end-of-treatment (EoT) scans. Consequently, our radiomics analysis focused on these 31 patients who underwent [¹⁸F]FDG PET-CT scans before and after R-CHOP chemotherapy. Expert manual lesion segmentation was conducted on their scans for delta radiomics analysis, along with an additional 19 EoT scans, totaling 50 segmented scans for single time point analysis. Radiomics features (on PET and CT), along with maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV), tumor dissemination (Dmax), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and the area under the curve of cumulative standardized uptake value-volume histogram (AUC-CSH) were calculated. We additionally applied longitudinal analysis using radial mean intensity (RIM) changes. For prediction of relapse/progression, we utilized the individual coefficient approximation for risk estimation (ICARE) and machine learning (ML) techniques (K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Random Forest (RF)) including sequential feature selection (SFS) following correlation analysis for feature selection. For TTP, ICARE and CoxNet approaches were utilized. In all models, we used nested cross-validation (CV) (with 10 outer folds and 5 repetitions, along with 5 inner folds and 20 repetitions) after balancing the dataset using Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique (SMOTE). Results: To predict relapse/progression using Delta radiomics between the baseline (staging) and EoT scans, the best performances in terms of accuracy and F1 score (F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, where precision is the ratio of true positives to the sum of true positives and false positives, and recall is the ratio of true positives to the sum of true positives and false negatives) were achieved with ICARE (accuracy = 0.81 ± 0.15, F1 = 0.77 ± 0.18), RF (accuracy = 0.89 ± 0.04, F1 = 0.87 ± 0.04), and LDA (accuracy = 0.89 ± 0.03, F1 = 0.89 ± 0.03), that are higher compared to the predictive power achieved by using only EoT radiomics features. For the second category of our analysis, TTP prediction, the best performer was CoxNet (LASSO feature selection) with c-index = 0.67 ± 0.06 when using baseline + Delta features (inclusion of both baseline and Delta features). The TTP results via Delta radiomics were comparable to the use of radiomics features extracted from EoT scans for TTP analysis (c-index = 0.68 ± 0.09) using CoxNet (with SFS). The performance of Deauville Score (DS) for TTP was c-index = 0.66 ± 0.09 for n = 50 and 0.67 ± 03 for n = 31 cases when using EoT scans with no significant differences compared to the radiomics signature from either EoT scans or baseline + Delta features (p-value> 0.05). Conclusion: This work demonstrates the potential of Delta radiomics and the importance of using EoT scans to predict progression and TTP from PMBCL [¹⁸F]FDG PET-CT scans. Full article

Recently, several studies introduced the potential prognostic usefulness of maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax) measured by 2-deoxy-2-fluorine-18-fluoro-D-glucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT). Dmax is a simple three-dimensional feature that represents the maximal distance between the two farthest hypermetabolic PET lesions. A comprehensive computer literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was conducted, including articles indexed up to 28 February 2023. Ultimately, 19 studies analyzing the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT Dmax in patients with lymphomas were included. Despite their heterogeneity, most studies showed a significant prognostic role of Dmax in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Some articles showed that the combination of Dmax with other metabolic features, such as MTV and interim PET response, proved to better stratify the risk of relapse or death. However, some methodological open questions need to be clarified before introducing Dmax into clinical practice. Full article