Search Results (2)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of surface topography of gutta-percha (GP) cones and plasticized disks of GP on the initial adhesion of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). The GP cones (Tanari and Dentsply brands) were cut 3 mm from the apical portion and fixed on a glass slide. To make the disks, the cones were thermoplasticized in standardized molds. The specimens were divided into groups according to the shape of the GP and the presence or absence of the bacteria. For contamination, the strain of E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) was used. The surface topography was analyzed using an atomic force microscope (AFM). The surface, roughness, and waviness parameters were evaluated by the Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn test. The comparison between disks and cones showed significant differences, where the cones were rougher, with a higher value attributed to the Dentsply cone (DC group). The same was observed for the waviness. After contamination, there was greater bacterial accumulation in cones, especially in their valleys, but both the surface and the topography became more homogeneous and smoother, with no differences between disks and cones of both brands. The topographic surface of the GP, at the micro and nanoscale, influences the initial adhesion of E. faecalis, with a greater tendency for contamination in regions associated with the presence of roughness and waviness. In this context, plasticization of GP is indicated, as it reduces surface irregularities compared to cones, contributing to less retention of bacteria. Full article

To prevent re-infection and provide a hermetic seal of the root canal system, an endodontist must aim to produce a void-free obturation. This review aimed to compare the completeness of root canal obturation between the two most prevalent methods—cold lateral condensation and warm gutta-percha techniques—using micro-CT (PROSPERO reg no. 249815). Materials and Methods: A search of Scopus, Embase, PubMed (Medline via PubMed), and Web of Science databases was done without any time restriction according to the PRISMA protocol. Articles that compared both techniques and were published in English were included. Data was extracted and the risk of bias was assessed using an adapted tool based on previous studies. Results: A total of 141 studies were identified by the search. Following the screening and selection of articles, 9 studies were included for review. Data was extracted manually and tabulated. Most studies had a moderate risk of bias. None determined operator skill in both methods before comparison. The data extracted from the included studies suggests that both techniques produce voids in the obturation. The thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques may result in fewer voids compared to cold lateral condensation. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the included studies, it was concluded that neither technique could completely obturate the root canal. Thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques showed better outcomes despite a possible learning bias in favor of cold lateral condensation. Establishing operator skills before comparison may help reduce this bias. Full article