Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = takeback programmes

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
25 pages, 4934 KB  
Article
What Brought Me Here? Different Consumer Journeys for Practices of Sustainable Disposal through Takeback Programmes
by Manoela Lawall Radtke, Stefânia Ordovás de Almeida and Lélis Balestrin Espartel
Sustainability 2022, 14(9), 5003; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095003 - 21 Apr 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3469
Abstract
Despite being considered a consumption behaviour, disposal is still treated in an incipient way in the consumer literature. In addition, little is known about the entire journey of those who practice sustainable consumption disposal. In order to fill this gap, this exploratory, qualitative [...] Read more.
Despite being considered a consumption behaviour, disposal is still treated in an incipient way in the consumer literature. In addition, little is known about the entire journey of those who practice sustainable consumption disposal. In order to fill this gap, this exploratory, qualitative study used semi-structed interviews with 15 consumers who already discarded items through return programmes for recycling purposes of two products: slow fashion wallets and coffee capsules. The products are from two companies in Brazil, Dobra and Terra Cycle, whose managers were also interviewed. Records of photos and videos made by these consumers were also part of the research material, in addition to the analysis of brands’ social media. Content analysis with deductive coding was used to analyse the data. The results allow for the proposition of a disposal journey framework and the understanding of this journey and its touchpoints for the products as a different trajectory. Still, it was found that detachment, emotional and mental separation from the product, only happens in some circumstances. The theoretical, managerial, and social implications of this journey of sustainable consumption disposal are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Customer Experience—through the Lens of Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 446 KB  
Article
Cleaning up China’s Medical Cabinet—An Antibiotic Take-Back Programme to Reduce Household Antibiotic Storage for Unsupervised Use in Rural China: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
by Leesa Lin, Xiaomin Wang, Weiyi Wang, Xudong Zhou and James R. Hargreaves
Antibiotics 2020, 9(5), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9050212 - 27 Apr 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4355
Abstract
Background: Antibiotic misuse and unsafe disposal harm the environment and human health and contribute to the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Household storage of antibiotics for unsupervised use and careless disposal of medications is a common practice in China and most low- and [...] Read more.
Background: Antibiotic misuse and unsafe disposal harm the environment and human health and contribute to the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Household storage of antibiotics for unsupervised use and careless disposal of medications is a common practice in China and most low- and middle-income countries. Currently, few interventions are available to address this challenge. Objective: This study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based, theory-informed, community-based take-back programme for disposing household’s expired, unwanted, or unused antibiotics in rural China. Methods: We adopted the RE-AIM framework and the community-based participatory research principles in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the intervention. The RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) and Medical Research Council’s frameworks were employed in analysing and reporting evaluation results. A mixed-methods, controlled pre-and post-test design was used for (1) quantitative surveying of a representative community panel of 50 households, and (2) qualitative semi-structured stakeholders’ interviews to explore intervention and study design feasibility and acceptability at three phases: pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention. Quantitative and qualitative data from a similar village—serving as a control—were also collected. Results: All a priori feasibility objectives were met: Conversion to consent was 100.0% (100 screened, approached, recruited, and consented). All participants completed the pre-intervention assessment, and 44/50 households in the intervention village completed the post-intervention assessment. The programme, embedded in existing social and physical infrastructure for dissemination, directly reached over 68.2% (30/44) of its target audience. Stakeholders reported the intervention and study design as feasible and acceptable. Conclusions: This study illustrates the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of community-based antibiotic take-back programmes in China to encourage safe disposal and decrease the availability of expired, unwanted, or unused antibiotics in the household for unsupervised use. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop