Search Results (2)

In this paper, we present a simple way to place the implant into a harvested pocket and to subsequently fix it percutaneously. Eighteen patients (1 male, 13 females, 4 transgender), underwent facial implant placement; a total of 31 implants were placed (1 pair of angles of the mandible implants, 12 pairs of malar/sub-malar implants, and 5 chin implants). The intraoral approach was performed on 15 patients, and on the remaining three patients, the sub-ciliary lower lid approach was preferred. Patients were followed up for at least one year with a maximum follow-up of seven years (mean 1.8 years). In all the cases, except one, patients healed without complications. One case of implant displacement and infection was recorded. No other complication was documented. The technique described is similar to the one suggested by Peled, although some useful tips were added, namely the use of sutures, not only to fix the implant but also to drive it into the harvested pocket. In addition, larger absorbable “left in place” sutures were used, avoiding accidental implant dislocation during their removal. Further studies are required to gain a more complete understanding of the effectiveness and reproducibility of this surgical technique. Full article

Secondary corrective osteotomy of malunited craniofacial fractures can be a challenging proposition. The exposure, extrusion, and palpability of the titanium implants used become a genuine concern especially in areas of relatively thin skin, such as the periorbital region. Restoring a satisfactory contour to the midface is another major task for the plastic surgeon. Bone cement used to reconstruct craniofacial defects has existed for many years. However, most applications have been as a substitute for autogenous bone grafts for defects less than 25 cm². In this article, we present two cases of malunited facial fractures that underwent corrective osteotomy, during which we felt that despite the conventional osteotomy and reduction techniques, there was still either a small remnant step deformity or suboptimal contour smoothness due to prominence of the implants used. We thus used bone cement as a resurfacing medium over titanium implants to restore good malar contour and reduce the palpability and exposure rate of the titanium implants. We report good patient satisfaction with contour correction with no increase in wound infection rates or any delay in wound healing. There was initial chemosis associated with the use of the bone cement, which resolved in both patients within 3 to 4 weeks. Postoperative computed tomography showed some degree of osteointegration but no fraction of the bone cement. Calcium phosphate bone cement thus presents an attractive adjunctive method for midfacial contour resurfacing, when used in conjunction with conventional osteotomy procedures and as an onlay over prominent titanium implants. Full article