Search Results (5)

Background/Objectives: Aerosolized medications are common practice for mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Infants often receive nebulized medications via hand ventilation using an anesthesia bag, but evidence on optimal aerosol delivery with this method is limited. For this study, various configurations of the Mapleson breathing circuit were tested to optimize albuterol delivery to a simulated pediatric model. Methods: Using a simulated pediatric lung model (ASL 5000) with the semi-open Mapleson anesthesia circuit, 2.5 mg/3 mL of albuterol sulfate solution was nebulized to a viral/bacterial filter (Respiguard 202). Four models were compared with varying fresh gas flows (FGFs), small-volume nebulizer (SVN) placements, and adjusting dead space. Five Registered Respiratory Therapists (RRTs) bagged the aerosol into a collection filter following defined ventilation parameters. Each model was tested in random order to avoid fatigue bias. Albuterol concentrations eluted from in-line filters were measured by spectrophotometry (absorbance at 276 nm). Results: No inter-user variability was observed among the RRTs. Significant differences in albuterol recovered were noted between models (One Way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc, n = 5). Model 4, with the nebulizer closest to the collecting filter, recovered 21.77 ± 1.89% of albuterol. The standard clinical model was the least effective, with only 0.10 ± 0.17% albuterol recovery. Conclusions: Modifying the anesthesia breathing circuit significantly improved aerosol drug delivery efficiency. Our findings suggest that current clinical practices for nebulized drug delivery are inefficient and can be markedly improved with simple adjustments in nebulizer positioning and gas flow within the circuit. Full article

Aerosolized lung surfactant therapy during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support avoids intubation but is highly complex, with reported poor nebulizer efficiency and low pulmonary deposition. The study objective was to evaluate particle size, operational compatibility, and drug delivery efficiency with various nasal CPAP interfaces and gas humidity levels of a synthetic dry powder (DP) surfactant aerosol delivered by a low-flow aerosol chamber (LFAC) inhaler combined with bubble nasal CPAP (bCPAP). A particle impactor characterized DP surfactant aerosol particle size. Lung pressures and volumes were measured in a preterm infant nasal airway and lung model using LFAC flow injection into the bCPAP system with different nasal prongs. The LFAC was combined with bCPAP and a non-heated passover humidifier. DP surfactant mass deposition within the nasal airway and lung was quantified for different interfaces. Finally, surfactant aerosol therapy was investigated using select interfaces and bCPAP gas humidification by active heating. Surfactant aerosol particle size was 3.68 µm. Lung pressures and volumes were within an acceptable range for lung protection with LFAC actuation and bCPAP. Aerosol delivery of DP surfactant resulted in variable nasal airway (0–20%) and lung (0–40%) deposition. DP lung surfactant aerosols agglomerated in the prongs and nasal airways with significant reductions in lung delivery during active humidification of bCPAP gas. Our findings show high-efficiency delivery of small, synthetic DP surfactant particles without increasing the potential risk for lung injury during concurrent aerosol delivery and bCPAP with passive humidification. Specialized prongs adapted to minimize extrapulmonary aerosol losses and nasal deposition showed the greatest lung deposition. The use of heated, humidified bCPAP gases compromised drug delivery and safety. Safety and efficacy of DP aerosol delivery in preterm infants supported with bCPAP requires more research. Full article

It remains unknown whether the type of aerosol generating device is affecting efficacy and safety among non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) adults. The proposal of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of inhaled antibiotics administered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) and via nebulizers (SVN) among adult patients with NCFB. Inclusion criteria were randomized-controlled trials, adults (≥18 years) with NCFB, and inhaled antibiotics administered via DPI as intervention. Search strategy was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from 2000 to 2019. Sixteen trials (2870 patients) were included. Three trials (all ciprofloxacin) used DPIs and thirteen used SVN (three ciprofloxacin). Both DPI and SVN devices achieved similar safety outcomes (adverse events, antibiotic discontinuation, severe adverse events, and bronchospasm). Administration of ciprofloxacin via DPI significantly improved time to first exacerbation (87 days, 95% CI 34.3–139.7) and quality of life (MD −7.52; 95% CI −13.06 to −1.98) when compared with via SVN. No other significant differences were documented in clinical efficacy (at least one exacerbation, FEV₁% predicted) and microbiologic response (bacterial eradication, emergence of new potential pathogens, and emergence of antimicrobial resistance) when comparing devices. Our NMA documented that time to first exacerbation and quality of life, were more favorable for DPIs. Decisions on the choice of devices should incorporate these findings plus other criteria, such as simplicity, costs or maintenance requirements. Full article

Nebulization could be a valuable solution to administer drugs to neonates receiving noninvasive respiratory support. Small and irregular tidal volumes and air leaks at the patient interface, which are specific characteristics of this patient population and are primarily responsible for the low doses delivered to the lung (D_DL) found in this application, have not been thoroughly addressed in in vitro and in vivo studies for quantifying D_DL. Therefore, we propose a compartment-based mathematical model able to describe convective aerosol transport mechanisms to complement the existing deposition models. Our model encompasses a mechanical ventilator, a nebulizer, and the patient; the model considers the gas flowing between compartments, including air leaks at the patient–ventilator interface. Aerosol particles are suspended in the gas flow and homogeneously distributed. The impact of breathing pattern variability, volume of the nebulizer, and leaks level on D_DL is assessed in representative conditions. The main finding of this study is that convective mechanisms associated to air leaks and breathing patterns with tidal volumes smaller than the nebulizer dramatically reduce the D_DL (up to 70%). This study provides a possible explanation to the inconsistent results of drug aerosolization in clinical studies and may provide guidance to improve nebulizer design and clinical procedures. Full article

(1) Background: It is common practice in the treatment of respiratory diseases to mix different inhalation solutions for simultaneous inhalation. At present, a small number of studies have been published that evaluate the physicochemical compatibility and aerosol characteristics of different inhalation medications. However, none of them studied Atrovent^®. Our work aims to address the lack of studies on Atrovent^®. (2) Methods: Portions of admixtures were withdrawn at certain time intervals after mixing and were tested by pH determination, osmolarity measurement, and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay of each active ingredient as measures of physicochemical compatibility. The geometrical and aerosol particle size distribution, active drug delivery rate, and total active drug delivered were measured to characterize aerosol behaviors. (3) Results: During the testing time, no significant variation was found in the pH value, the osmotic pressure, or the active components of admixtures. With the increase in nebulization volume after mixing, fine particle dose (FPD) and total active drug delivered showed statistically significant improvements, while the active drug delivery rate decreased compared to the single-drug preparations. (4) Conclusions: These results endorse the physicochemical compatibility of Atrovent^® over 1 h when mixed with other inhalation medications. Considering aerosol characteristics, simultaneous inhalation is more efficient. Full article