Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = single-tube loop coils

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 8086 KiB  
Article
Analysis of Measurements of the Magnetic Flux Density in Steel Blocks of the Compact Muon Solenoid Magnet Yoke with Solenoid Coil Fast Discharges
by Vyacheslav Klyukhin, Benoit Curé, Andrea Gaddi, Antoine Kehrli, Maciej Ostrega and Xavier Pons
Symmetry 2024, 16(12), 1689; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16121689 - 19 Dec 2024
Viewed by 1124
Abstract
The general-purpose Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is used to study the production of new particles in proton–proton collisions at an LHC center of mass energy of 13.6 TeV. The detector includes a magnet based [...] Read more.
The general-purpose Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) detector at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN is used to study the production of new particles in proton–proton collisions at an LHC center of mass energy of 13.6 TeV. The detector includes a magnet based on a 6 m diameter superconducting solenoid coil operating at a current of 18.164 kA. This current creates a central magnetic flux density of 3.8 T that allows for the high-precision measurement of the momenta of the produced charged particles using tracking and muon subdetectors. The CMS magnet contains a 10,000 ton flux-return yoke of dodecagonal shape made from the assembly of construction steel blocks distributed in several layers. These steel blocks are magnetized with the solenoid returned magnetic flux and wrap the muons escaping the hadronic calorimeters of total absorption. To reconstruct the muon trajectories, and thus to measure the muon momenta, the drift tube and cathode strip chambers are located between the layers of the steel blocks. To describe the distribution of the magnetic flux in the magnet yoke layers, a three-dimensional computer model of the CMS magnet is used. To validate the calculations, special measurements are performed, with the flux loops wound in 22 cross-sections of the flux-return yoke blocks. The measured voltages induced in the flux loops during the CMS magnet ramp-ups and -downs, as well as during the superconducting coil fast discharges, are integrated over time to obtain the initial magnetic flux densities in the flux loop cross-sections. The measurements obtained during the seven standard ramp-downs of the magnet were analyzed in 2018. From that time, three fast discharges occurred during the standard ramp-downs of the magnet. This allows us to single out the contributions of the eddy currents, induced in steel, to the flux loop voltages registered during the fast discharges of the coil. Accounting for these contributions to the flux loop measurements during intentionally triggered fast discharges in 2006 allows us to perform the validation of the CMS magnet computer model with better precision. The technique for the flux loop measurements and the obtained results are presented and discussed. The method for measuring magnetic flux density in steel blocks described in this study is innovative. The experience of 3D modeling and measuring the magnetic field in steel blocks of the magnet yoke, as part of a muon detector system, has good prospects for use in the construction and operation of particle detectors for the Future Circular Electron–Positron Collider and the Circular Electron–Positron Collider. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Physics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 6635 KiB  
Article
Wireless Drone Charging Station Using Class-E Power Amplifier in Vertical Alignment and Lateral Misalignment Conditions
by Aqeel Mahmood Jawad, Rosdiadee Nordin, Haider Mahmood Jawad, Sadik Kamel Gharghan, Asma’ Abu-Samah, Mahmood Jawad Abu-Alshaeer and Nor Fadzilah Abdullah
Energies 2022, 15(4), 1298; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041298 - 11 Feb 2022
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 4883
Abstract
Recent major advancements in drone charging station design are related to the differences in coil design between the material (copper or aluminum) and inner thickness (diameter design) to address power transfer optimization and increased efficiency. The designs are normally challenged with reduced weight [...] Read more.
Recent major advancements in drone charging station design are related to the differences in coil design between the material (copper or aluminum) and inner thickness (diameter design) to address power transfer optimization and increased efficiency. The designs are normally challenged with reduced weight on the drone’s side, which can lead to reduced payload or misalignment position issues between receiver and transmitter, limiting the performance of wireless charging. In this work, the coil combination was tested in vertical alignment from 2 cm to 50 cm, and in lateral misalignment positions that were stretched across 2, 5, 8, 10, and 15 cm ranges. Simulated and experimental results demonstrated improved transfer distances when the drone battery load was 100 Ω. With the proposed design, the vertical transfer power that was achieved was 21.12 W, 0.460 A, with 81.5% transfer efficiency, while the maximum lateral misalignment air gap that was achieved was 2 cm with 19.22 W and 74.15% efficiency. This study provides evidence that the developed circuit that is based on magnetic resonant coupling (MRC) is an effective technique towards improving power transfer efficiency across different remote and unmanned Internet of Things (IoT) applications, including drones for radiation monitoring and smart agriculture. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 8178 KiB  
Article
Single-Tube and Multi-Turn Coil Near-Field Wireless Power Transfer for Low-Power Home Appliances
by Aqeel Mahmood Jawad, Rosdiadee Nordin, Sadik Kamel Gharghan, Haider Mahmood Jawad, Mahamod Ismail and Mahmood Jawad Abu-AlShaeer
Energies 2018, 11(8), 1969; https://doi.org/10.3390/en11081969 - 30 Jul 2018
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 6523
Abstract
Single-tube loop coil (STLC) and multi-turn copper wire coil (MTCWC) wireless power transfer (WPT) methods are proposed in this study to overcome the challenges of battery life during low-power home appliance operations. Transfer power, efficiency, and distance are investigated for charging mobile devices [...] Read more.
Single-tube loop coil (STLC) and multi-turn copper wire coil (MTCWC) wireless power transfer (WPT) methods are proposed in this study to overcome the challenges of battery life during low-power home appliance operations. Transfer power, efficiency, and distance are investigated for charging mobile devices on the basis of the two proposed systems. The transfer distances of 1–15 cm are considered because the practicality of this range has been proven to be reliable in the current work on mobile device battery charging. For STLC, the Li-ion battery is charged with total system efficiencies of 86.45%, 77.08%, and 52.08%, without a load, at distances of 2, 6, and 15 cm, respectively. When the system is loaded with 100 Ω at the corresponding distances, the transfer efficiencies are reduced to 80.66%, 66.66%, and 47.04%. For MTCWC, the battery is charged with total system efficiencies of 88.54%, 75%, and 52.08%, without a load, at the same distances of 2, 6, and 15 cm. When the system is loaded with 100 Ω at the corresponding distances, the transfer efficiencies are drastically reduced to 39.52%, 33.6%, and 15.13%. The contrasting results, between the STLC and MTCWC methods, are produced because of the misalignment between their transmitters and receiver coils. In addition, the diameter of the MTCWC is smaller than that of the STLC. The output power of the proposed system can charge the latest smartphone in the market, with generated output powers of 5 W (STLC) and 2 W (MTCWC). The above WPT methods are compared with other WPT methods in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wireless Power Transfer 2018)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop