Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = sequential Monte Carlo samplers

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
26 pages, 1149 KB  
Article
A Massively Parallel SMC Sampler for Decision Trees
by Efthyvoulos Drousiotis, Alessandro Varsi, Alexander M. Phillips, Simon Maskell and Paul G. Spirakis
Algorithms 2025, 18(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/a18010014 - 2 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1073
Abstract
Bayesian approaches to decision trees (DTs) using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers have recently demonstrated state-of-the-art accuracy performance when it comes to training DTs to solve classification problems. Despite the competitive classification accuracy, MCMC requires a potentially long runtime to converge. A [...] Read more.
Bayesian approaches to decision trees (DTs) using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers have recently demonstrated state-of-the-art accuracy performance when it comes to training DTs to solve classification problems. Despite the competitive classification accuracy, MCMC requires a potentially long runtime to converge. A widely used approach to reducing an algorithm’s runtime is to employ modern multi-core computer architectures, either with shared memory (SM) or distributed memory (DM), and use parallel computing to accelerate the algorithm. However, the inherent sequential nature of MCMC makes it unsuitable for parallel implementation unless the accuracy is sacrificed. This issue is particularly evident in DM architectures, which normally provide access to larger numbers of cores than SM. Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) samplers are a parallel alternative to MCMC, which do not trade off accuracy for parallelism. However, the performance of SMC samplers in the context of DTs is underexplored, and the parallelization is complicated by the challenges in parallelizing its bottleneck, namely redistribution, especially on variable-size data types such as DTs. In this work, we study the problem of parallelizing SMC in the context of DTs both on SM and DM. On both memory architectures, we show that the proposed parallelization strategies achieve asymptotically optimal O(log2N) time complexity. Numerical results are presented for a 32-core SM machine and a 256-core DM cluster. For both computer architectures, the experimental results show that our approach has comparable or better accuracy than MCMC but runs up to 51 times faster on SM and 640 times faster on DM. In this paper, we share the GitHub link to the source code. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Parallel and Distributed Computing: Algorithms and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 5652 KB  
Article
Robust Inference of Dynamic Covariance Using Wishart Processes and Sequential Monte Carlo
by Hester Huijsdens, David Leeftink, Linda Geerligs and Max Hinne
Entropy 2024, 26(8), 695; https://doi.org/10.3390/e26080695 - 16 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1573
Abstract
Several disciplines, such as econometrics, neuroscience, and computational psychology, study the dynamic interactions between variables over time. A Bayesian nonparametric model known as the Wishart process has been shown to be effective in this situation, but its inference remains highly challenging. In this [...] Read more.
Several disciplines, such as econometrics, neuroscience, and computational psychology, study the dynamic interactions between variables over time. A Bayesian nonparametric model known as the Wishart process has been shown to be effective in this situation, but its inference remains highly challenging. In this work, we introduce a Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampler for the Wishart process, and show how it compares to conventional inference approaches, namely MCMC and variational inference. Using simulations, we show that SMC sampling results in the most robust estimates and out-of-sample predictions of dynamic covariance. SMC especially outperforms the alternative approaches when using composite covariance functions with correlated parameters. We further demonstrate the practical applicability of our proposed approach on a dataset of clinical depression (n=1), and show how using an accurate representation of the posterior distribution can be used to test for dynamics in covariance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 6245 KB  
Technical Note
Full-Waveform Inversion of Time-Lapse Crosshole GPR Data Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method
by Shengchao Wang, Liguo Han, Xiangbo Gong, Shaoyue Zhang, Xingguo Huang and Pan Zhang
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(22), 4530; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13224530 - 11 Nov 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2564
Abstract
Crosshole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an important tool for a wide range of geoscientific and engineering investigations, and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is a heuristic global optimization method that can be used to solve the inversion problem. In this paper, [...] Read more.
Crosshole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is an important tool for a wide range of geoscientific and engineering investigations, and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method is a heuristic global optimization method that can be used to solve the inversion problem. In this paper, we use time-lapse GPR full-waveform data to invert the dielectric permittivity. An inversion based on the MCMC method does not rely on an accurate initial model and can introduce any complex prior information. Time-lapse ground-penetrating radar has great potential to monitor the properties of a subsurface. For the time-lapse inversion, we used the double difference method to invert the time-lapse target area accurately and full-waveform data. We propose a local sampling strategy taking advantage of the a priori information in the Monte Carlo method, which can sample only the target area with a sequential Gibbs sampler. This method reduces the calculation and improves the inversion accuracy of the target area. We have provided inversion results of the synthetic time-lapse waveform data that show that the proposed method significantly improves accuracy in the target area. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications II)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

33 pages, 694 KB  
Article
Evolutionary Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers for Change-Point Models
by Arnaud Dufays
Econometrics 2016, 4(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics4010012 - 8 Mar 2016
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 7065
Abstract
Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods are widely used for non-linear filtering purposes. However, the SMC scope encompasses wider applications such as estimating static model parameters so much that it is becoming a serious alternative to Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) methods. Not only do SMC [...] Read more.
Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) methods are widely used for non-linear filtering purposes. However, the SMC scope encompasses wider applications such as estimating static model parameters so much that it is becoming a serious alternative to Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo (MCMC) methods. Not only do SMC algorithms draw posterior distributions of static or dynamic parameters but additionally they provide an estimate of the marginal likelihood. The tempered and time (TNT) algorithm, developed in this paper, combines (off-line) tempered SMC inference with on-line SMC inference for drawing realizations from many sequential posterior distributions without experiencing a particle degeneracy problem. Furthermore, it introduces a new MCMC rejuvenation step that is generic, automated and well-suited for multi-modal distributions. As this update relies on the wide heuristic optimization literature, numerous extensions are readily available. The algorithm is notably appropriate for estimating change-point models. As an example, we compare several change-point GARCH models through their marginal log-likelihoods over time. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Complexity in Bayesian Econometric Analysis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop