Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = seed mycobiome

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 2670 KiB  
Article
Mycobiome and Pathogenic Fusarium Fungi in the Rhizosphere of Durum Wheat After Seed Dressing with Debaryomyces hansenii
by Weronika Giedrojć and Urszula Wachowska
Agriculture 2025, 15(6), 639; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15060639 - 18 Mar 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Debaryomyces hansenii naturally colonize wheat grain and can potentially inhibit the pathogens responsible for Fusarium crown rot (FCR). Seed dressing is a recommended method for protecting crops against FCR pathogens. The effectiveness of seed dressing with antagonistic yeasts in reducing the incidence of [...] Read more.
Debaryomyces hansenii naturally colonize wheat grain and can potentially inhibit the pathogens responsible for Fusarium crown rot (FCR). Seed dressing is a recommended method for protecting crops against FCR pathogens. The effectiveness of seed dressing with antagonistic yeasts in reducing the incidence of FCR remains insufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of seed dressing with a triazole fungicide and a suspension of D. hansenii cells on the health status and development of durum wheat cultivars (Durasol and Floradur), and to analyze the structure of the mycobiome in the rhizosphere of seedlings. Under field conditions, the incidence of FCR was reduced by 57.1% by triticonazole and 35.7% by the biocontrol agent relative to the control treatment. Seed dressing with D. hansenii decreased the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of Fusarium pathogens by 47.24% in cv. Durasol and 87.4% in cv. Floradur. The number of OTUs of autochthonous yeast species and Mortierellomycota increased in the rhizosphere of both durum wheat cultivars. The effectiveness of seed dressing with yeasts is determined by the quality and local adaptation of biocontrol agents. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Seed Science and Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2863 KiB  
Article
Metabolome and Mycobiome of Aegilops tauschii Subspecies Differing in Susceptibility to Brown Rust and Powdery Mildew Are Diverse
by Veronika N. Pishchik, Elena P. Chizhevskaya, Arina A. Kichko, Tatiana S. Aksenova, Evgeny E. Andronov, Vladimir K. Chebotar, Polina S. Filippova, Tatiana V. Shelenga, Maria H. Belousova and Nadezhda N. Chikida
Plants 2024, 13(17), 2343; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13172343 - 23 Aug 2024
Viewed by 1454
Abstract
The present study demonstrated the differences in the seed metabolome and mycobiome of two Aegilops tauschii Coss accessions with different resistance to brown rust and powdery mildew. We hypothesized that the seeds of resistant accession k-1958 Ae. tauschii ssp. strangulata can contain a [...] Read more.
The present study demonstrated the differences in the seed metabolome and mycobiome of two Aegilops tauschii Coss accessions with different resistance to brown rust and powdery mildew. We hypothesized that the seeds of resistant accession k-1958 Ae. tauschii ssp. strangulata can contain a larger number of metabolites with antifungal activity compared with the seeds of susceptible Ae. tauschii ssp meyeri k-340, which will determine differences in the seed fungal community. Our study emphasizes the differences in the seed metabolome of the studied Ae. tauschii accessions. The resistant accession k-1958 had a higher content of glucose and organic acids, including pyruvic, salicylic and azelaic acid, as well as pipecolic acids, galactinol, glycerol and sitosterol. The seeds of Ae. tauschii-resistant accession k-1958 were found to contain more active substances with antifungal activity. The genera Cladosporium and Alternaria were dominant in the seed mycobiome of the resistant accession. The genera Alternaria, Blumeria and Cladosporium dominated in seed mycobiome of susceptible accession k-340. In the seed mycobiome of the resistant k-1958, a higher occurrence of saprotrophic micromycetes was found, and many of the micromycetes were biocontrol agents. It was concluded that differences in the seed metabolome of Ae. tauschii contributed to the determination of the differences in mycobiomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Plant Disease Diagnostics and Surveillance in Plant Protection)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2834 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Cone Age and Urbanisation on the Diversity and Community Composition of Culturable Seed Fungal Endophytes within Native Australian Banksia ericifolia L.f. subsp. ericifolia
by Merize Philpott, Edward C. Y. Liew, Marlien M. van der Merwe, Allison Mertin and Kristine French
J. Fungi 2023, 9(7), 706; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9070706 - 27 Jun 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2116
Abstract
Seed fungal endophytes play a crucial role in assisting the overall health and success of their host plant; however, little is known about the factors that influence the diversity and composition of these endophytes, particularly with respect to how they change over time [...] Read more.
Seed fungal endophytes play a crucial role in assisting the overall health and success of their host plant; however, little is known about the factors that influence the diversity and composition of these endophytes, particularly with respect to how they change over time and within urban environments. Using culturing techniques, morphological analyses, and Sanger sequencing, we identified the culturable seed fungal endophytes of Banksia ericifolia at two urban and two natural sites in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. A total of 27 Operational Taxonomic Units were obtained from 1200 seeds. Older cones were found to contain, on average, more colonised endophytes than younger cones. Species richness was also significantly influenced by cone age, with older cones being more speciose. Between urban and natural sites, the overall community composition did not change, although species richness and diversity were greatest at urban sites. Understanding how these endophytes vary in time and space may help provide an insight into the transmission pathways used and the potential role they play within the development and survival of the seed. This knowledge may also be crucial for restoration purposes, especially regarding the need to consider endophyte viability in ex situ seed collection and storage in seed-banking practices. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Perspectives on Fungal Endophytes Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 6994 KiB  
Article
Stochastic Inoculum, Biotic Filtering and Species-Specific Seed Transmission Shape the Rare Microbiome of Plants
by David Johnston-Monje, Janneth P. Gutiérrez and Luis Augusto Becerra Lopez-Lavalle
Life 2022, 12(9), 1372; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12091372 - 2 Sep 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3699
Abstract
A plant’s health and productivity is influenced by its associated microbes. Although the common/core microbiome is often thought to be the most influential, significant numbers of rare or uncommon microbes (e.g., specialized endosymbionts) may also play an important role in the health and [...] Read more.
A plant’s health and productivity is influenced by its associated microbes. Although the common/core microbiome is often thought to be the most influential, significant numbers of rare or uncommon microbes (e.g., specialized endosymbionts) may also play an important role in the health and productivity of certain plants in certain environments. To help identify rare/specialized bacteria and fungi in the most important angiosperm plants, we contrasted microbiomes of the seeds, spermospheres, shoots, roots and rhizospheres of Arabidopsis, Brachypodium, maize, wheat, sugarcane, rice, tomato, coffee, common bean, cassava, soybean, switchgrass, sunflower, Brachiaria, barley, sorghum and pea. Plants were grown inside sealed jars on sterile sand or farm soil. Seeds and spermospheres contained some uncommon bacteria and many fungi, suggesting at least some of the rare microbiome is vertically transmitted. About 95% and 86% of fungal and bacterial diversity inside plants was uncommon; however, judging by read abundance, uncommon fungal cells are about half of the mycobiome, while uncommon bacterial cells make up less than 11% of the microbiome. Uncommon-seed-transmitted microbiomes consisted mostly of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteriodetes, Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes, which most heavily colonized shoots, to a lesser extent roots, and least of all, rhizospheres. Soil served as a more diverse source of rare microbes than seeds, replacing or excluding the majority of the uncommon-seed-transmitted microbiome. With the rarest microbes, their colonization pattern could either be the result of stringent biotic filtering by most plants, or uneven/stochastic inoculum distribution in seeds or soil. Several strong plant–microbe associations were observed, such as seed transmission to shoots, roots and/or rhizospheres of Sarocladium zeae (maize), Penicillium (pea and Phaseolus), and Curvularia (sugarcane), while robust bacterial colonization from cassava field soil occurred with the cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya into Arabidopsis and Panicum roots, and Streptomyces into cassava roots. Some abundant microbes such as Sakaguchia in rice shoots or Vermispora in Arabidopsis roots appeared in no other samples, suggesting that they were infrequent, stochastically deposited propagules from either soil or seed (impossible to know based on the available data). Future experiments with culturing and cross-inoculation of these microbes between plants may help us better understand host preferences and their role in plant productivity, perhaps leading to their use in crop microbiome engineering and enhancement of agricultural production. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interactions between Microorganisms, Their Environment and Host)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop