Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (2)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
8 pages, 226 KiB  
Article
The Degree of Hydronephrosis as an Indicator of the Necessity for Ureteric Dilatation during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
by Hyun-Soo Lee, Seon-Beom Jo, Wonku Hwang, Jong-Wook Kim, Mi-Mi Oh, Hong-Seok Park, Du-Geon Moon and Sun-Tae Ahn
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(14), 4591; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144591 - 10 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1276
Abstract
During rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, it is often encountered that the ureter is difficult to access. Attempts to advance the ureteroscope make the surgery more difficult. This study evaluated the preoperative predictive factors associated with difficult ureteral access (difficult ureter (DU)) during URS and [...] Read more.
During rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy, it is often encountered that the ureter is difficult to access. Attempts to advance the ureteroscope make the surgery more difficult. This study evaluated the preoperative predictive factors associated with difficult ureteral access (difficult ureter (DU)) during URS and assessed if clinical outcomes differed according to the degree of DU. This study identified 217 patients who underwent rigid ureteroscopic (URS) lithotripsy for the management of ureter stones between June 2017 and July 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Korea. In this group, preoperative factors were identified using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses that could predict the degree of DU. Additionally, we also evaluated differences in treatment outcomes depending on the degree of DU. In 50 URS cases (22.0%), ureteral access using a ureteroscope was difficult. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the degree of hydronephrosis was associated with the degree of DU. Treatment outcomes, extended operation times, low stone-free rate, postoperative pain, and secondary treatment were also significantly associated with the degree of DU. Clinicians can counsel patients with a lesser degree of hydronephrosis and approach their management accordingly. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)
7 pages, 229 KiB  
Article
Reverse Trendelenburg Lithotomy with Certain Inclination Angles Reduces Stone Retropulsion during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stone
by Shihai Li, Jianchen Wu, Qiang Li and Jiawei Zhang
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(12), 2020; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12122020 - 7 Dec 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2128
Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate how different inclination angles of reverse Trendelenburg lithotomy affect stone retropulsion and stone-free rates during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. Patients with proximal ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy in our institution between January 2019 [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to investigate how different inclination angles of reverse Trendelenburg lithotomy affect stone retropulsion and stone-free rates during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones. Patients with proximal ureteral stones undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy in our institution between January 2019 and December 2020 were included according to predefined criteria. The rigid ureteroscope and Holmium: YAG laser were utilized to perform lithotripsy, and a stone basket was used to keep the stone in place and to avoid retropulsion. Before initiating lithotripsy, the upper part of the patient’s body was tilted up to establish a reverse Trendelenburg posture with appropriate inclination angles. To quantify the stone-free rate, computed tomography was used to evaluate the residual stones in the kidney one month following surgery. Patients’ clinical data were obtained retrospectively, including age, gender, the largest diameter of stone, stone density on computed tomography, and the distance between stone and ureteral pelvic junction, etc. Patients were divided into four groups based on the inclination angles of reverse Trendelenburg lithotomy: 0°, 10°, 20°, and 30°. The chi-square test was used to compare stone retropulsion and stone-free rates between groups. To discover possible determinants of the stone-free rate, logistic regression analyses were used. There were 189 patients that qualified. There were no differences in clinical characteristics between groups (p > 0.05). Multiple comparisons between groups revealed that the 20° and 30° groups had less retropulsion and a greater stone-free rate than the 0° and 10° groups (p < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences in stone retropulsion or stone-free rates between the 20° and 30° groups or between the 0° and 10° groups (p > 0.05). The inclination angles as well as distance between the stone and ureteral pelvic junction were identified by using logistic regression analyses as the related factors for the stone-free rate. According to our results, the appropriate inclination angles of reverse Trendelenburg lithotomy during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones would help preclude stone retropulsion and increase the stone-free rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Minimally Invasive Urological Surgery and Endourology)
Back to TopTop