Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (8)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = radiobiological criteria

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
30 pages, 7700 KiB  
Article
Optimization Function for Determining Optimal Dose Range for Beef and Seed Potato Irradiation
by Elena Kozlova, Ulyana Bliznyuk, Alexander Chernyaev, Polina Borshchegovskaya, Arcady Braun, Victoria Ipatova, Sergey Zolotov, Alexander Nikitchenko, Natalya Chulikova, Anna Malyuga, Yana Zubritskaya, Timofey Bolotnik, Anastasia Oprunenko, Aleksandr Kozlov, Mikhail Beklemishev, Roza Yagudina and Igor Rodin
Foods 2024, 13(23), 3729; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13233729 - 21 Nov 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1191
Abstract
The objective of this study is to develop a universally applicable approach for establishing the optimal dose range for the irradiation of plant and animal products. The approach involves the use of the optimization function for establishing the optimal irradiation dose range for [...] Read more.
The objective of this study is to develop a universally applicable approach for establishing the optimal dose range for the irradiation of plant and animal products. The approach involves the use of the optimization function for establishing the optimal irradiation dose range for each category of plant and animal product to maximize the suppression of targeted pathogens while preserving the surrounding molecules and biological structures. The proposed function implies that pathogens found in the product can be efficiently suppressed provided that irradiation is performed with the following criteria in mind: a high irradiation dose uniformity, a high probability of irradiation hitting pathogens and controlled heterogeneity of radiobiological sensitivity of pathogens. This study compares the optimal dose ranges for animal and plant products using beef tenderloin and seed potato tubers as examples. In a series of experiments, our team traced the dose dependencies of myoglobin oxidation in beef and the amount of potential damage to albumin’s native structure. The behavior patterns of myoglobin derivatives and the amount of potential damage to albumin found in this study determined the optimal dose range, which appeared to be wider for beef irradiation compared to that for seed potato tubers, as they do not require uniform irradiation of the entire volume since targeted phytopathogens are predominantly found within the surface layers of the tubers. The use of proprietary methods involving spectrophotometry and high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry provides a novel perspective on the quantitative assessment of the myoglobin oxidation level and the potential damage to albumin’s native structure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1634 KiB  
Article
Hypofractionated Post-Prostatectomy Radiotherapy in 16 Fractions: A Single-Institution Outcome
by Pavol Dubinsky, Vladimir Vojtek, Katarina Belanova, Natalia Janickova, Noemi Balazova and Zuzana Tomkova
Life 2023, 13(7), 1610; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13071610 - 23 Jul 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1932
Abstract
Background: The optimal hypofractionated schedule of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy remains to be established. We evaluated treatment outcomes and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in 16 daily fractions delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The treatment schedule selection was motivated by limited technology resources and was [...] Read more.
Background: The optimal hypofractionated schedule of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy remains to be established. We evaluated treatment outcomes and toxicity of moderately hypofractionated post-prostatectomy radiotherapy in 16 daily fractions delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The treatment schedule selection was motivated by limited technology resources and was radiobiologically dose-escalated. Methods: One hundred consecutive M0 patients with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy were evaluated. Radiotherapy indication was adjuvant (ART) in 19%, early-salvage (eSRT) in 46% and salvage (SRT) in 35%. The dose prescription for prostate bed planning target volume was 52.8 Gy in 16 fractions of 3.3 Gy. The Common Terminology Criteria v. 4 for Adverse Events scale was used for toxicity grading. Results: The median follow-up was 61 months. Five-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was 78.6%, distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) was 95.7% and overall survival was 98.8%. Treatment indication (ART or eSRT vs. SRT) was the only significant factor for bRFS (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05–0.47, p = 0.001) and DMFS (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03–0.90; p = 0.038). Acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity grade 2 was recorded in 24%, grade 3 in 2%, acute genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade 2 in 10% of patients, and no grade 3. A cumulative rate of late GI toxicity grade ≥ 2 was observed in 9% and late GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 in 16% of patients. Conclusions: The observed results confirmed efficacy and showed a higher than anticipated rate of early GI, late GI, and GU toxicity of post-prostatectomy radiobiologically dose-escalated hypofractionated radiotherapy in 16 daily fractions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prostate Cancer: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 262 KiB  
Review
Image Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) and Delta (Δ) Radiomics—An Urgent Alliance for the Front Line of the War against Head and Neck Cancers
by Camil Ciprian Mireștean, Roxana Irina Iancu and Dragoș Petru Teodor Iancu
Diagnostics 2023, 13(12), 2045; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122045 - 13 Jun 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2701
Abstract
The identification of a biomarker that is response predictive could offer a solution for the stratification of the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNC) in the context of high recurrence rates, especially those associated with loco-regional failure. Delta (Δ) radiomics, a concept [...] Read more.
The identification of a biomarker that is response predictive could offer a solution for the stratification of the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNC) in the context of high recurrence rates, especially those associated with loco-regional failure. Delta (Δ) radiomics, a concept based on the variation of parameters extracted from medical imaging using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, demonstrates its potential as a predictive biomarker of treatment response in HNC. The concept of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), including computer tomography simulation (CT) and position control imaging with cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT), now offers new perspectives for radiomics applied in radiotherapy. The use of Δ features of texture, shape, and size, both from the primary tumor and from the tumor-involved lymph nodes, demonstrates the best predictive accuracy. If, in the case of treatment response, promising Δ radiomics results could be obtained, even after 24 h from the start of treatment, for radiation-induced xerostomia, the evaluation of Δ radiomics in the middle of treatment could be recommended. The fused models (clinical and Δ radiomics) seem to offer benefits, both in comparison to the clinical model and to the radiomic model. The selection of patients who benefit from induction chemotherapy is underestimated in Δ radiomic studies and may be an unexplored territory with major potential. The advantage offered by “in house” simulation CT and CBCT favors the rapid implementation of Δ radiomics studies in radiotherapy departments. Positron emission tomography (PET)-CT Δ radiomics could guide the new concepts of dose escalation on radio-resistant sub-volumes based on radiobiological criteria, but also guide the “next level” of HNC adaptive radiotherapy (ART). Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiomics in Oncology 3rd Edition)
25 pages, 2761 KiB  
Article
Quantitative Correlations between Radiosensitivity Biomarkers Show That the ATM Protein Kinase Is Strongly Involved in the Radiotoxicities Observed after Radiotherapy
by Eymeric Le Reun, Larry Bodgi, Adeline Granzotto, Laurène Sonzogni, Mélanie L. Ferlazzo, Joëlle Al-Choboq, Laura El-Nachef, Juliette Restier-Verlet, Elise Berthel, Clément Devic, Audrey Bouchet, Michel Bourguignon and Nicolas Foray
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(18), 10434; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810434 - 9 Sep 2022
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 2360
Abstract
Tissue overreactions (OR), whether called adverse effects, radiotoxicity, or radiosensitivity reactions, may occur during or after anti-cancer radiotherapy (RT). They represent a medical, economic, and societal issue and raise the question of individual response to radiation. To predict and prevent them are among [...] Read more.
Tissue overreactions (OR), whether called adverse effects, radiotoxicity, or radiosensitivity reactions, may occur during or after anti-cancer radiotherapy (RT). They represent a medical, economic, and societal issue and raise the question of individual response to radiation. To predict and prevent them are among the major tasks of radiobiologists. To this aim, radiobiologists have developed a number of predictive assays involving different cellular models and endpoints. To date, while no consensus has been reached to consider one assay as the best predictor of the OR occurrence and severity, radiation oncologists have proposed consensual scales to quantify OR in six different grades of severity, whatever the organ/tissue concerned and their early/late features. This is notably the case with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Few radiobiological studies have used the CTCAE scale as a clinical endpoint to evaluate the statistical robustness of the molecular and cellular predictive assays in the largest range of human radiosensitivity. Here, by using 200 untransformed skin fibroblast cell lines derived from RT-treated cancer patients eliciting OR in the six CTCAE grades range, correlations between CTCAE grades and the major molecular and cellular endpoints proposed to predict OR (namely, cell survival at 2 Gy (SF2), yields of micronuclei, recognized and unrepaired DSBs assessed by immunofluorescence with γH2AX and pATM markers) were examined. To our knowledge, this was the first time that the major radiosensitivity endpoints were compared together with the same cohort and irradiation conditions. Both SF2 and the maximal number of pATM foci reached after 2 Gy appear to be the best predictors of the OR, whatever the CTCAE grades range. All these major radiosensitivity endpoints are mathematically linked in a single mechanistic model of individual response to radiation in which the ATM kinase plays a major role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3327 KiB  
Article
Assessment of Radiation-Induced Bladder and Bowel Cancer Risks after Conventionally and Hypo-Fractionated Radiotherapy for the Preoperative Management of Rectal Carcinoma
by Ekaterini Matsali, Eleftherios P. Pappas, Efrossyni Lyraraki, Georgia Lymperopoulou, Michalis Mazonakis and Pantelis Karaiskos
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(9), 1442; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12091442 - 31 Aug 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2811
Abstract
Preoperative management of rectal carcinoma can be performed by employing either conventionally or hypo-fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT or HFRT, respectively), delivered by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, employing 6 MV or 10 MV photon beams. This study aims [...] Read more.
Preoperative management of rectal carcinoma can be performed by employing either conventionally or hypo-fractionated Radiotherapy (CFRT or HFRT, respectively), delivered by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans, employing 6 MV or 10 MV photon beams. This study aims to dosimetrically and radiobiologically compare all available approaches, with emphasis on the risk of radiation-induced second cancer to the bladder and bowel. Computed Tomography (CT) scans and relevant radiotherapy contours from 16 patients were anonymized and analyzed retrospectively. For each case, CFRT of 25 × 2 Gy and HFRT of 5 × 5 Gy were both considered. IMRT and VMAT plans using 6 MV and 10 MV photons were prepared. Plan optimization was performed, considering all clinically used plan quality indices and dose–volume constraints for the critical organs. Resulting dose distributions were analyzed and compared. Moreover, the Lifetime Attributable Risk (LAR) for developing radiation-induced bladder and bowel malignancies were assessed using a non-linear mechanistic model, assuming patient ages at treatment of 45, 50, 55 and 60 years. All 128 plans created were clinically acceptable. Risk of second bladder cancer reached 0.26% for HFRT (5 × 5 Gy) and 0.19% for CFRT (25 × 2 Gy) at the age of 45. Systematically higher risks were calculated for HFRT (5 × 5 Gy) as compared to CFRT (25 × 2 Gy), with 6 MV photons resulting in slightly increased LAR, as well. Similar or equal bowel cancer risks were calculated for all techniques and patient ages investigated (range 0.05–0.14%). This work contributes towards radiotherapy treatment protocol selection criteria for the preoperative irradiation of rectal carcinoma. However, more studies are needed to establish the associated radiation-induced risk of each RT protocol. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Personalized Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1670 KiB  
Article
A Novel Approach to Design and Evaluate BNCT Neutron Beams Combining Physical, Radiobiological, and Dosimetric Figures of Merit
by Ian Postuma, Sara González, Maria S Herrera, Lucas Provenzano, Michele Ferrarini, Chiara Magni, Nicoletta Protti, Setareh Fatemi, Valerio Vercesi, Giuseppe Battistoni, Umberto Anselmi Tamburini, Yuan Hao Liu, Leena Kankaanranta, Hanna Koivunoro, Saverio Altieri and Silva Bortolussi
Biology 2021, 10(3), 174; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10030174 - 26 Feb 2021
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 5136
Abstract
(1) Background:The quality of neutron beams for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is currently defined by its physical characteristics in air. Recommendations exist to define whether a designed beam is useful for clinical treatment. This work presents a new way to evaluate neutron [...] Read more.
(1) Background:The quality of neutron beams for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) is currently defined by its physical characteristics in air. Recommendations exist to define whether a designed beam is useful for clinical treatment. This work presents a new way to evaluate neutron beams based on their clinical performance and on their safety, employing radiobiological quantities. (2) Methods: The case study is a neutron beam for deep-seated tumors from a 5 MeV proton beam coupled to a beryllium target. Physical Figures of Merit were used to design five beams; however, they did not allow a clear ranking of their quality in terms of therapeutic potential. The latter was then evaluated based on in-phantom dose distributions and on the calculation of the Uncomplicated Tumor Control Probability (UTCP). The safety of the beams was also evaluated calculating the in-patient out-of-beam dosimetry. (3) Results: All the beams ensured a UTCP comparable to the one of a clinical beam in phantom; the safety criterion allowed to choose the best candidate. When this was tested in the treatment planning of a real patient treated in Finland, the UTCP was still comparable to the one of the clinical beam. (4) Conclusions: Even when standard physical recommendations are not met, radiobiological and dosimetric criteria demonstrate to be a valid tool to select an effective and safe beam for patient treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: From Nuclear Physics to Biomedicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1303 KiB  
Article
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Carbon Ion Radiotherapy Boost for Acinic Cell Carcinoma of the Salivary Glands
by Maximilian P. Schmid, Thomas Held, Kristin Lang, Klaus Herfarth, Juliane Hörner-Rieber, Semi B. Harrabi, Julius Moratin, Christian Freudlsperger, Karim Zaoui, Jürgen Debus and Sebastian Adeberg
Cancers 2021, 13(1), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13010124 - 2 Jan 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2647
Abstract
Aim: to report clinical outcome in patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) boost. Materials and Methods: all patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated at [...] Read more.
Aim: to report clinical outcome in patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) boost. Materials and Methods: all patients with acinic cell carcinoma of the salivary glands treated at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center were considered for this retrospective analysis. All patients received a CIRT boost with 18–24 Gy radiobiologic effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose in 3 Gy RBE-weighted dose per fraction followed by IMRT, with 50–54 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction. Disease outcome was evaluated for local (LR), nodal (NR), distant recurrence (DR), and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Morbidity was scored based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5. Descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for analysis. Results: fifteen patients were available for analysis. Median follow-up after radiotherapy was 43 months. Six patients were treated for primary disease and nine for recurrent disease. Eight patients were treated with radiotherapy for macroscopic disease. Disease recurrence was observed in four patients: 1 LR, 2 NR, and 2 DR; 5-year local control, DFS, and OS were 80%, 52%, and 80%, respectively. No radiotherapy-related G3-5 morbidity was observed. Conclusion: In acinic cell carcinoma, IMRT with carbon ion radiotherapy boost leads to excellent results after R1-resection and is a promising treatment modality for definitive treatment in inoperable patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Therapeutic Advances in Rare Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
Split Common Coincidence Point Problem: A Formulation Applicable to (Bio)Physically-Based Inverse Planning Optimization
by Charles E. Chidume and Lois C. Okereke
Symmetry 2020, 12(12), 2086; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12122086 - 15 Dec 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2249
Abstract
Inverse planning is a method of radiotherapy treatment planning where the care team begins with the desired dose distribution satisfying prescribed clinical objectives, and then determines the treatment parameters that will achieve it. The variety in symmetry, form, and characteristics of the objective [...] Read more.
Inverse planning is a method of radiotherapy treatment planning where the care team begins with the desired dose distribution satisfying prescribed clinical objectives, and then determines the treatment parameters that will achieve it. The variety in symmetry, form, and characteristics of the objective functions describing clinical criteria requires a flexible optimization approach in order to obtain optimized treatment plans. Therefore, we introduce and discuss a nonlinear optimization formulation called the split common coincidence point problem (SCCPP). We show that the SCCPP is a suitable formulation for the inverse planning optimization problem with the flexibility of accommodating several biological and/or physical clinical objectives. Also, we propose an iterative algorithm for approximating the solution of the SCCPP, and using Bregman techniques, we establish that the proposed algorithm converges to a solution of the SCCPP and to an extremum of the inverse planning optimization problem. We end with a note on useful insights on implementing the algorithm in a clinical setting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry in Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Optimization Theory)
Back to TopTop